LAST BIG EXPLOIT! Avoid The Soviet Civil War!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 7 вер 2022
  • Experience the freedom of fishing in a vast open world on your own or with friends in online co-op multiplayer for up to 12 players. There’s a lot of exciting things planned for the game ahead - in short-term and long-term - including a console release that's coming soon. Learn more:
    wehy.pe/y/9/FeedBackGaming
    No step back added the new reworked Soviet focus tree and with it came new alt history paths all result in a civil war. BUT what if I told you there was a exploit to go down the right right opposition path and keep Stalin incharge AND HAVE NO CIVIL WAR! Brutally broken! Not only that but it includes 0 consumer goods and a load of production bonus's. OP Russia all ready for by blood alone. Putin would be proud!
    Support me on PATREON / feedbackgaming
    Sub to my MAIN UA-cam: ‪@DaveFeedBackGaming‬
    Sub to my FEEDBACKIRL on UA-cam: ‪@FeedbackIRL‬
    Sub to MEMES channel: ‪@feedbackmemes‬
    Sub for SHORTS: ‪@feedbackshorts3731‬
    DISCORD talk with me / discord
    Follow on TWITTER: / feedbackgaming
    Follow for TWITCH livestreams: / feedbackgaming
    Business email: davefeedbackgaming@gmail.com
    Hearts of Iron IV is a grand strategy wargame developed by Paradox Development Studio and published by Paradox Interactive. Released on June 6, 2016, it is the sequel to Hearts of Iron III and part of the Hearts of Iron series of grand strategy games focusing on World War II. The player may take control of any nation in the world in either 1936 or 1939 and lead them to victory or defeat against other countries.
    Feedbackgaming is known for his exploits, cheats, unlimited money videos. Is inspired by other successful influencers like the spiffing brit, isp, bokoen and tommykaylive.
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Business email: davefeedbackgaming@gmail.com
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    #hoi4 #sovietunion #stalin
  • Ігри

КОМЕНТАРІ • 390

  • @DaveFeedBackGaming
    @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +121

    Experience the freedom of fishing in a vast open world on your own or with friends in online co-op multiplayer for up to 12 players. There’s a lot of exciting things planned for the game ahead - in short-term and long-term - including a console release that's coming soon. Learn more:
    wehy.pe/y/9/FeedBackGaming #ad wehy.pe/y/10/FeedBackGaming

    • @Kingbustercomments
      @Kingbustercomments Рік тому +4

      Funny fish game

    • @CyborgCook
      @CyborgCook Рік тому +3

      Is this time travel?

    • @franciscosoares2440
      @franciscosoares2440 Рік тому +1

      @@CyborgCook probably released earlier for members/patreons

    • @Hjalle_Gaming
      @Hjalle_Gaming Рік тому

      try to make a video about an exsploit i found. zero consumergoods as germany. you have to go imperial. under the civil war tak total mobelisacion and exstencive conscribsion. after that end the war. the rush "prepare for the next blockade" pared with 100 stab you will have zero comsumergoods

    • @isimiel3405
      @isimiel3405 Рік тому +2

      Fish are the lowest production cost submarine

  • @agentwash1
    @agentwash1 Рік тому +683

    The cursed Timeline where Stalin had a complete total meltdown and plotted against himself then couped himself and put himself back in power

    • @FalkyRocket2222
      @FalkyRocket2222 Рік тому +78

      the doctors were too scared to take care of his insanity, bet that could happen in any timeline

    • @gyarurespecter3386
      @gyarurespecter3386 Рік тому +5

      Ioseph Stalin (Schizo Form)

    • @EnforcerX71
      @EnforcerX71 Рік тому +2

      Red Flood has a similar storyline, just with France.

    • @Marfius_Au_Marfongus
      @Marfius_Au_Marfongus 3 місяці тому

      The ideal timeline

    • @0ld_Scratch
      @0ld_Scratch 2 місяці тому +2

      To be fair this is totally in character

  • @DoctorAllanGrey
    @DoctorAllanGrey Рік тому +831

    you'd think the act of 'just ignore the events to see if they autofire properly' would've been QA'd fairly easily by the first guy to go afk while testing the paranoia but... oops.

    • @ghost28896
      @ghost28896 Рік тому +67

      I tried this, but was not able to recreate it. In my case it auto pick the top option (Bukharin) once the time runs out, and the war starts.

    • @imthedanger557
      @imthedanger557 Рік тому +88

      @@ghost28896 he only posts exploit videos after paradox fixes it

    • @joelthorstensson2772
      @joelthorstensson2772 Рік тому +53

      @@imthedanger557 that kinda defeats the point?

    • @robertmowrey2009
      @robertmowrey2009 Рік тому

      QA must click button now

    • @DKforever24
      @DKforever24 Рік тому +20

      @@joelthorstensson2772 Feedback explains his reasoning in his first 'infinite tank exploit' video a few months ago.

  • @caelphillips8895
    @caelphillips8895 Рік тому +249

    4:15 It means that the farmlands were privatley owned but heavily regulated and unionized as to ensure that the workers still had control over the land. If you want to learn more, I'd recommend reading the New Economic Policy. It was originally implemented by Lenin after the Civil war to help stimulate growth and then removed by Stalin (Trotsky supported planned economies as well) in favor of the planned economies which allowed for rapid development of heavy industry.

    • @Makarosc
      @Makarosc Рік тому +11

      Market Socialism?

    • @jaredsheehan480
      @jaredsheehan480 Рік тому +50

      @@Makarosc State Capitalist actually, at least that's what Lenin called it.

    • @x999uuu1
      @x999uuu1 Рік тому +41

      More so state capitalism, like modern day China and vietnam

    • @caelphillips8895
      @caelphillips8895 Рік тому +47

      ​@@Makarosc Long Answer inbound. The TL;DR is not quite. They have differing economic and political frameworks, but similar ideas.
      Long Answer:
      Market Socialism still uses the capitalist framework of large private sectors with varying degrees of regulation. The NEP used by the Soviets required a much larger public sector than that of Market Socialism. It's also meant as a temporary solution. It was implemented after the civil war, because Lenin himself recognized that if capitalism is controlled by the working class, it can be used for a swifter recovery than an immediate transition into planned economies. However, Stalin moved away from the NEP and into planned economies because even though the NEP was providing a successful recovery, it was not industrializing fast enough.
      "We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they will crush us." - Stalin's 1931 speech "The Tasks of Economic Executives (marx2mao.com/Stalin/TEE31.html). The Third Reich launched Operation Barbarossa in 1941. Ten years after the prediction.
      Market Socialism also does not require a the proletariat, or any subdivision of the working class, to hold a class dictatorship, whereas the NEP does. Class dictatorship in this sense means which economic class is running the government. In Marxist frameworks it's the working class, where as in capitalist and non-Marxist Socialism, it's the capitalists and "petite bourgeoise".

    • @joujou264
      @joujou264 Рік тому +10

      And they should've stuck with it. Stalin and the other tankies left a giant blemish on communist and other far left governing styles.

  • @notapokemontrainer800
    @notapokemontrainer800 Рік тому +340

    Stuff aside, I think you can actually prevent a civil war without exploits in the right opposition path
    There's a focus where it gives you a decision that has 50% chance to assassinate Stalin (80% if you get NKVD support), in which Beria then succeeds him
    After that, the coup d'etat focus would instead replace Beria with Bukharin without needing a civil war
    Edit: Also, the exploit Feedback used is actually a bug where if you don't click anything on an event pop up, it won't give any effects after the pop up expires. It may work on basically any event, including those in mods, not just the vanilla Soviet Civil War.

    • @rps215
      @rps215 Рік тому +25

      You have to protect either Yagoda or Yezhov, whoever you manage to befriend. Beriya will never turn to your side.

    • @tijmenwillard2337
      @tijmenwillard2337 Рік тому +1

      Yeah, but it sucks

    • @gabelol9987
      @gabelol9987 Рік тому +1

      so ur saying that it's random if I get a civil war or not?

    • @gabelol9987
      @gabelol9987 Рік тому

      or is it just because he's playing ironman?

    • @rps215
      @rps215 Рік тому +4

      @@gabelol9987 Not the civil war part but 2 things are RNG. First is who and what Stalin will purge, though you can protect some people at the cost of PP and Stalin's paranoia increase. Purges from "Stalin's Focuses" however cannot be prevented so timer is ticking if you want to save some people (I think Zinoviev and a few others). The second RNG is the result of Stalin assassination plot. You have higher chance if you manage to finish the NKVD focus, but even then it is still RNG and has no guarantee that it will be successful.
      If you are successful in assassination of Stalin, it doesn't save you from civil war just yet. Beriya still have the paranoia level increase if you do certain things and focuses. However once Stalin is gone, finishing the Coup d'etat focus will result in Beriya getting arrested instead of the civil war and you can get whoever you want (Bukharin, Rykov, or Zinoviev) in power.

  • @floppados
    @floppados Рік тому +57

    00:00 - beggining
    18:37 - end

  • @Tommuli_Haudankaivaja
    @Tommuli_Haudankaivaja Рік тому +58

    It'd actually make more sense to build mils inside a puppet that you are planing to keep as a puppet, as they'll give 75% of their mills and only 25% of their civs.

  • @RokSzczura
    @RokSzczura Рік тому +96

    When I first saw this I thought "They can't be serious". How could they miss such enormous exploit. This just shows that devs don't test their game and let you do it.

    • @benismann
      @benismann Рік тому +7

      i actually wonder how tf does it break. It should click the topmost option if the timer runs out, and it doesnt look like a news event (they dont do that), so what tf happens even

    • @x999uuu1
      @x999uuu1 Рік тому +15

      Apparently some hoi4 events when they aren't clicked just kind of.... expire.
      Which is weird bc I'm pretty sure eu4 and vicky2 just auto click the top option instead.

    • @RokSzczura
      @RokSzczura Рік тому +4

      @@x999uuu1 Well, other options in Russian civil war, like tsarists and i think trotskyists don't work the same way. They expire and shit hits the fan.

    • @benismann
      @benismann Рік тому

      ​@@x999uuu1 ye but i wonder why is that

    • @gigaus0
      @gigaus0 Рік тому +2

      @@benismann There's a few way it breaks, but in this case there's no 'default' option, and since no option is triggered, the flag doesn't get set.

  • @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx
    @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx Рік тому +198

    Me: asking a month ago for Dave to complete Trotsky path without causing 25 world tension, with autonomous soviet republics, comecon and being able to Puppet evryone around you also Japan.
    Dave: *ask and you shall recieve!*

    • @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx
      @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx Рік тому +9

      Actually it doesnt work as far as i m aware. In order to go Long live the workers focus or Permanent revolution you need ciwil war to be over.

    • @DaveFeedBackGaming
      @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +25

      Yep. Hense why I didn't do Trotsky. TRUST ME I tried

    • @tempejkl
      @tempejkl Рік тому

      @@xXxMonkeyBoomxXx wouldn’t you just end the civil war then? If you get loads of military support you can end it by 1938 and then prepare for Barbarossa.

  • @GamerFromKZ
    @GamerFromKZ Рік тому +78

    Ok FeedBack, ok

  • @leviathansnemesis3742
    @leviathansnemesis3742 Рік тому +18

    I've tried this 4 times now and it looks like the Dev's have fixed it.

  • @WarlordZsinj
    @WarlordZsinj Рік тому +21

    Bukharin was a proponent of the New Economic Policy, which was a carefully crafted injection of capitalism and markets into the Soviet Union. Something that Deng would adopt for China later on. Stalin would adopt the collectivization of the farmers instead. Bukharin was considered on the right (within the party) because of this and some of his other thoughts. Also was considered the heir to Lenin until Stalin used him to win support away from Trotsky and Bukharin himself.

  • @ben9583_
    @ben9583_ Рік тому +20

    For context about the right opposition, yes, Bukharin supported giving more autonomy to the farmers. During the Russian Civil War, Lenin implemented the "New Economic Policy", which implemented some limited forms of capitalism for farmers. This was because the civil war devastated Russia and agricultural production had plummeted. It actually stuck around until 1928 when Stalin eliminated it. There were powerful figures like Bukharin who thought it should have stayed, until Stalin eliminated them as well.

  • @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx
    @xXxMonkeyBoomxXx Рік тому +14

    Stalin Permanent revolution confirmed ? Stir proletariat uprising in neighbouring countries ? Dave you are genius.

    • @mytiliss682
      @mytiliss682 Рік тому

      He becomes the thing he ought to destroy.

  • @remi609
    @remi609 Рік тому +8

    "Infinite number of frances" As if one wasn't too much...

  • @Assassi_BG_Gaming
    @Assassi_BG_Gaming Рік тому +6

    doesn’t work on 1.12. Civil war still starts

  • @thewednesday5893
    @thewednesday5893 Рік тому +1

    I heard the kaer morhen theme from the witcher during the sponsor section and i felt so happy

  • @jaredsheehan480
    @jaredsheehan480 Рік тому +45

    This is quite a supreme exploit I must say.

  • @ezehernandez
    @ezehernandez Рік тому

    Amazing i hope i can try it before they fix it, i always go right oppo but this seems faster and saves some advisors

  • @fuadlabib703
    @fuadlabib703 Рік тому +1

    Keep going guys just 99k to go

  • @OccasusRaven
    @OccasusRaven Рік тому +4

    Im pretty sure FBG is actually secretly working with Paradox trying to find exploits.

  • @Ashathefree8
    @Ashathefree8 Рік тому +10

    If I remember correctly, Bukharin wanted to bring back the NEP, and essentially wanted to do what Deng did to China, so to being in limited free market reforms, there prob some differences between them, but I aint interested in doing a deep dive of studying either.

  • @AdiKq
    @AdiKq Рік тому +3

    Nice. I love that exploit but I think it can be use even more.

  • @neilangelomolleda7283
    @neilangelomolleda7283 Рік тому +7

    You could remove some of the malus by doin focuses and not rushing the Civil war. "Seek support from the party" unlocks the focus to get rid of trotskyite plot. And factionlism pp gain can be removed entirely.

  • @fidoruh
    @fidoruh Рік тому +2

    But a part two for this one would be fun.

  • @unbindingfloyd
    @unbindingfloyd Рік тому +2

    Dont think I didn't hear that NOD "flame tank" audio from C&C lol

  • @owenscastlexiii5131
    @owenscastlexiii5131 Рік тому +1

    perfect timing for the sponsor to be fishing related

  • @II.Justinian
    @II.Justinian Рік тому +3

    I came here for cheese I found BIG exploit that changes game. FeedBackGaming you never change :)

  • @electricVGC
    @electricVGC Рік тому +1

    True Dave feedback gaming moment

  • @NetoKruzer
    @NetoKruzer Рік тому +4

    I demand part II...
    Do it...

  • @Lancelot683
    @Lancelot683 Рік тому +1

    So, I requested this from Antasil and I saw this here STATISFIED!

  • @aisir3725
    @aisir3725 Рік тому +1

    "We are in the lonely, cold part of the world"
    *Looks precisely on my hometown*

  • @solgerWhyIsThereAnAtItLooksBad

    Manchuria and Inner Mongolia are different enough for it to make since to be releasable

  • @scubandym1941
    @scubandym1941 Рік тому +2

    Brilliant

  • @noneofyourbusiness3288
    @noneofyourbusiness3288 Рік тому +2

    4:05 "We just take the civil war and push it somewhere else."

  • @x999uuu1
    @x999uuu1 Рік тому +2

    Could you do this going down Trotskys path too?

  • @dylandevries75
    @dylandevries75 Місяць тому

    I thought the lines in the add in the beginning were cracks in my screen 😂😂

  • @bigfish2796
    @bigfish2796 Рік тому +1

    What, thehunter sponsored a hoi4 youtuber. This it the greatest colab in history.

  • @andrewgreenwood9068
    @andrewgreenwood9068 Місяць тому

    4:24 worker cooperative rather than state enterprise. Similar to Yugoslavia under tito.

  • @LudietHistoria
    @LudietHistoria Рік тому +16

    There's always a part 2.....
    In our hearts

  • @newbornspirit
    @newbornspirit Рік тому

    damn dave. you broke it again

  • @Sky4Jus
    @Sky4Jus Рік тому +3

    You should play Lithuania. They're focus tree ia actually really decent. You get to annex the entirety of Poland and get all the cores with one easy 70 day focus. Plus you get lots of civs and mills from factories, and avoid war against Germany. It's actually decent.

  • @notjustiny.6750
    @notjustiny.6750 11 місяців тому +1

    Basically the Right Opposition was an anti stalinist movement to return to both the NEP and stop collectivisation, think of modern day chinese economics or yugoslav economics where the state controls a small important aspect but leaves the rest to the market. In Hoi4 this translates to less consumer goods, because state resources are no longer being used for all of management

  • @juliansickmann9379
    @juliansickmann9379 Рік тому +2

    Germany needs a Dlc to buff it I thought maybe a dlc called mittel Europa (central europe) where germany like the soviets gets buffed and gets more decisions and you can upgrade adolf and so on , Austria will be like Poland you have many paths you can choose and you can become very strong and at last Scandinavia will be treated like the Baltics all of them have something in common but also their owen ways

  • @linzabfb
    @linzabfb Рік тому +1

    "What I'm gonna do is mine the Atlantic *laughs like cpt Torres*"

  • @peoplesoft2784
    @peoplesoft2784 Рік тому +6

    My condolences for the Queen’s death.
    I don’t like monarchies in general, but I always respected Queen Elizabeth and what she did.
    Not sure If I’m being presumptuous but my condolences

  • @slemansleman1356
    @slemansleman1356 Рік тому +1

    Perfect

  • @ethanstaaf404
    @ethanstaaf404 Рік тому +4

    In this episode of Feedback Breaks Hoi, Stalin allows political discussion, everyone is unexpectedly happy.

    • @nomaders2
      @nomaders2 Рік тому

      the most historical game of hoi4

  • @bogdandrugov2127
    @bogdandrugov2127 Рік тому +1

    ye Dave the right opposition was about returning to NEP so it was kinda lessez faire version of cummunism

  • @Agent-wp3yi
    @Agent-wp3yi 5 місяців тому

    Btw u cant send eq to anybody anymore not even to Spain so no eq sending and stopping the sending to get it again

  • @Muinko
    @Muinko Рік тому +1

    part 2!

  • @rafaelaugustosimoes1813
    @rafaelaugustosimoes1813 Рік тому +1

    PART 2 !!!!!

  • @x999uuu1
    @x999uuu1 Рік тому +38

    From what I understand anyways, the Right Opposition was a particular subset of soviet leadership after lenin died. It was represented, as it is in game, by Bukharin and Rykov. It was called that as it was the more "right wing" (still very communist) side of Marxist leninist thought.
    The Right Opposition wanted a continuation of the NEP established in 1921 under Lenin and taken away by Stalin in 1927. They believed that the soviet union was too agrarian and the industrial proletariat too small to actually achieve socialism, so allowing small scale private enterprise back as opposed to a top down centrally planned economy would help kickstart industrial development and eventually "grow into" socialism. Keep in mind, when the NEP was first introduced, it was a compromise the bolsheviks did to restart the absolutely devastated soviet economy after the civil war. The Rights just saw it as the true way forward instead of a bandage.
    This is in opposition to the collectivization and five year plans the rest of the party wanted.
    If all of this sounds familiar, it's because China would end up doing something similar under Deng Xiaoping in the 1970s. Which is to say that the obstensively communist nation of China is clearly a state capitalist one nowadays. (This is why stalin and the rest of the party didn't like the NEP btw, with Trotsky fearing it would just lead down to capitalism)
    I think if this happened to the USSR in real life then they would have ended up something like modern China today. Definitely a higher quality of life than the actual USSR gave to its citizens anyways.

    • @x999uuu1
      @x999uuu1 Рік тому +3

      Also yes haha le funni TNO man

    • @RandyMCPEmaster
      @RandyMCPEmaster Рік тому +2

      But i wonder what would happen when the great depression hit though..

    • @mapoch9000
      @mapoch9000 Рік тому +8

      Soviet economy by the 1927 was demonstrating small growth rate (especially in heavy industry) and this rate was decreasing even more. So USSR would have ended up as lebensraum, and its citizens as ash.

    • @x999uuu1
      @x999uuu1 Рік тому +1

      Huh that's actually a good point.

    • @someguywithabanana6417
      @someguywithabanana6417 Рік тому

      the NEP, unlike dengism, had stuff like trade unions, worker co-op bussinesses, and soviets (which are also trade unions but not really) so it is doubtable the soviets would end up as authoritarian as China.

  • @greenmanwithagreenplan904
    @greenmanwithagreenplan904 Рік тому +5

    The fact that you can actually skip the civil war.....

  • @OverlordMalarkey
    @OverlordMalarkey Рік тому

    just casually using Witcher 3 music in your sponsorship haha

  • @Ashathefree8
    @Ashathefree8 Рік тому +2

    Whats so great about setting up collaboration governments? You always use them, I dont use them personally.

    • @DaveFeedBackGaming
      @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +1

      Nations capitulate quickly and get free compliance

    • @Ashathefree8
      @Ashathefree8 Рік тому +1

      @@DaveFeedBackGaming
      Im sorry I wasnt clear enough, i mean that one mechanic where the compliance gets high enough you can set up a little puppet state in occupied territory.

  • @Bigzthegreat
    @Bigzthegreat Рік тому +1

    the new focus trees are supper trigger happy with consumer goods. USSR and lithuania have so many of these consumer goods modifiers.

  • @subboid
    @subboid Рік тому +2

    Stalin ignored his paranoia for one minute and got overthrown by himself, and then chairs

  • @sgrizzo48
    @sgrizzo48 Рік тому

    Wait does that mean that you can keep ALL of your generals? O.o
    If so i hope they don't patch it anytime soon >.>

  • @KimFareseed
    @KimFareseed Рік тому +3

    Isn't an event still supposed to go through a defult option, if no button was pressed?

  • @JadenLightvale
    @JadenLightvale Рік тому +1

    Hello ladies and gentlemen it is Feeeeeedback gaminggggg

  • @maxvisser9528
    @maxvisser9528 Рік тому +1

    Part 2 when, FeedBackGaming?

  • @powerfulslime39
    @powerfulslime39 Рік тому +1

    You should try the Vatican mod

  • @keterpatrol7527
    @keterpatrol7527 Рік тому +2

    Feedback Gaming after playing the newest patch for 5 seconds:

  • @vebjrnsannerud6987
    @vebjrnsannerud6987 Рік тому +1

    would this strategy work if you go the path of romanovs?

  • @triersero2763
    @triersero2763 Рік тому +1

    So it is just like kaiserredux

  • @quentin6505
    @quentin6505 Рік тому

    About the curtailment of the farms and the debates inside the bolchevik party which are actually fascinating ; Boukahrin's stance was that Russia was too backward and rural to directly implement a full collectivized economy. The workers and the peasants had to work together and hence the worker's party should'nt impose a collectivized economy to a peasantry that just had gained the owned ownership of the land (1917 you know) nor impose drastic quotas on the farmers and use the capital to develop the industry (which is actually how the USSR industrialized so quickly IRL).
    Basicaly it meant that the soviet economy was meant to grow at a slower yet more human pace. It also meant securing democracy inside and outside the party, even thought that depends which member of the right opposition you are talking about. Tomski for instance was more prone towards independant trades union even thought he played its part in muzzling them.
    In contrast Trosky's platform was one of general regimentation of the workers and the peasantry, fast industrialisation and development to make Russia an active beacon of socialism that might spure and support the revolution throughout the world. He got wierldy allied with what used to be called the "worker's opposition" (because some of its members were actually real wokers such as Chiaplakov in contrast with the many journalist, lawyers, and other petit bourgeois ascent that ruled the party) that denounced the bolchevik's bureaucratics manners, the fadding of the soviets and trade union powers, but that was merely tactic.
    If I had to choose back then i would have went with Boukarhin tbh.

  • @Nick-rs5if
    @Nick-rs5if Рік тому +1

    Should have said:
    "100 000 likes of 100 000 mines"
    ;)

  • @justrugut9082
    @justrugut9082 Рік тому +1

    Flame tank under flaaaAaame boy. 10:23
    check it yourself

  • @victorsache558
    @victorsache558 Рік тому +2

    Does it work with the left opposition to? ( the civil war part)

    • @DaveFeedBackGaming
      @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +2

      Yes however if you go Trotsky you can't progress down the focus tree

    • @victorsache558
      @victorsache558 Рік тому

      Just fixed my comment. I meant the left opposition but still got the answer. Anyways, thx

  • @crossl4055
    @crossl4055 Рік тому +2

    I tried do this today and not worked, the civil war began (even dont doing nothing in the event) and I only had 17 divisions and Bukharin as leader, so I think that this bug was fixed

  • @tristanthebaut2073
    @tristanthebaut2073 Рік тому +1

    Let's hope paradox will never patch ot

  • @boomknight1015
    @boomknight1015 Рік тому

    Did they really forget to put a timer on that? lul

  • @calpster2390
    @calpster2390 Рік тому +4

    this doesnt work? how do you just avoid the civil war it just automatically fires?

    • @DaveFeedBackGaming
      @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +2

      It doesn't automatically fire. You have to click a button on the event to make it fire

    • @calpster2390
      @calpster2390 Рік тому +1

      @@DaveFeedBackGaming it does for me every time. Is there any other factors or steps that i have missed?

  • @harmless-kun
    @harmless-kun Рік тому +1

    100k Likes? You hear that everyone? Why not?

  • @backroomswikide
    @backroomswikide Рік тому

    What I'm wondering is why you always convert to cavallery as the ussr

  • @919Loki
    @919Loki Рік тому

    Why are your subs still on "mine laying"? The button is disabled, but they are still on the mission?

  • @CARL_093
    @CARL_093 Рік тому +1

    know i know why did it became to that when i do it

  • @nothingforwatch
    @nothingforwatch Рік тому +2

    F for Queen

  • @MikeJProto
    @MikeJProto Рік тому +2

    what about the exploit where you can use console commands in ironman mode?

  • @kevinhayes3672
    @kevinhayes3672 Рік тому +1

    If a country is making no consumer goods for years does everyone run out of trousers?

  • @mr.hugemustache5152
    @mr.hugemustache5152 Рік тому +1

    Rest in Peace Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, we all are mourning..

  • @mikadotz
    @mikadotz Рік тому +1

    civil war tosent fire becouse you got rid of nkvd>kgb so no security forces to catch you
    way no mountainers in etiopia dave

  • @geometryd
    @geometryd Рік тому +2

    2:25 USSR had the largest navy in the world.

  • @antorseax9492
    @antorseax9492 Рік тому +2

    Napoleon didn't use divide and conquer, he used defeat in detail

    • @DaveFeedBackGaming
      @DaveFeedBackGaming  Рік тому +1

      errrr those are the same thing

    • @antorseax9492
      @antorseax9492 Рік тому +1

      @@DaveFeedBackGaming No, no they aren't: defeat in detail is a military tactic; divide and conquer is a diplomatic and military strategy

    • @antorseax9492
      @antorseax9492 Рік тому

      @@DaveFeedBackGaming Although, it's worth mentioning that Napoleon tried (unsuccessfully) to divide and conquer

  • @cgulls6827
    @cgulls6827 Рік тому +3

    I've tested it in a singleplayer game and it doesnt seem to work? Does anyone know what I might have done wrong

  • @JAndaD700
    @JAndaD700 Рік тому +1

    Hey feed back I found a glitch… if you spam shift click on forts you get more than 10

  • @user-sw4kd5rj1c
    @user-sw4kd5rj1c Рік тому

    wait was bukharinsky involvedsky in a trotsky plotsky to overthrowtsky stalintsky by a bunch of chairtsky?

  • @gixo-sama8524
    @gixo-sama8524 Рік тому

    i tried to do the same as he did in the video but the war still fire idk why ?

  • @Teufelshund86
    @Teufelshund86 Рік тому +2

    Seems to be fixed :( tried it four times, doesn't work anymore

  • @NotKnafo
    @NotKnafo Рік тому +2

    instead of central planned economy system of distribution its a market style system of distribution

    • @bno6156
      @bno6156 Рік тому

      With the state being the final say in every matter?

    • @NotKnafo
      @NotKnafo Рік тому +1

      @@bno6156 as in state you mean a centralized council of people that are in one of the government branches i guess but not in every matter
      just distribution not production

    • @bno6156
      @bno6156 Рік тому

      @@NotKnafo deciding the value of the individuals labour rather than having the individual decide it. It’s not just the means of production, it’s every single aspect of the economy.

    • @NotKnafo
      @NotKnafo Рік тому +1

      @@bno6156 but in a market system the individual dont have too much control on the value of his labor power either since the prices are influenced by supply and demand the part where he does have influence is when there is a monopoly price like art

    • @NotKnafo
      @NotKnafo Рік тому +1

      @@bno6156 also its seems you mixing the terms of markets and capitalism and while they almost always go together they are not the same thing

  • @FakeSchrodingersCat
    @FakeSchrodingersCat Рік тому

    The left and right of the early soviet political structure was defined by Trotsky based off of but unrelated to the political spectrum used in the rest of the world today. At the time Bolshevik communism was the only allowed political ideology but just like leftists everywhere when you get 2 of them together to discuss politics you will end up with 3 ideologies and a major doctrinal dispute.
    The left was led by Trotsky (he came up with the definitions so of course he would associate himself with the politically best axis) and was mainly focused on internationalism believing that communism could not be achieved until the entire world was under communist governments. The center was Stalin who was focused on authoritarianism within a single country believing that only with absolute power over the state could you dictate the changes needed for communism and and that reforms should be hard and fast to achieve true communism in the shortest amount of time possible. The right was led by Bukharin and was the populists who thought that the path to communism relied on the support of the people, guided by rather then dictated to by the state and that you could not simply skip past socialism and proclaim communism or that making the entire world claim to be communist didn't matter if you were not actually working towards it. The closest equivalent to the soviet right is Vietnam's policy of socialization.
    As an example Stalin forced the farmers to work on large communal farms where everyone would share the work and the presumably the profits with the obvious problem that if the farm failed everyone would also starve. Bukharin's plan was for socialist land reform where farmers would farm only as much land as they could work but that land would be personal property leased from the state. That way if a farm failed the rest might not and the burden of feeding that farmer would not be overwhelming for the state. In this scenario Trotsky would ignore the entire debate and be trying to convince Mexican farmers to overthrow their government to start off the revolutionary string of dominos throughout central America.

  • @sahilhossian8212
    @sahilhossian8212 Рік тому

    Ah yes hoi4 the red order lore momentum 100 be like:

  • @nathanielclaw2694
    @nathanielclaw2694 Рік тому +1

    Is it working with 1.11.13 ?

  • @adamsaputrama5934
    @adamsaputrama5934 Рік тому +1

    Niceeeeeee

  • @atomicexistentialism8428
    @atomicexistentialism8428 Рік тому +2

    The Rightists I believe stood for complete self-organization to agricultural affairs, meaning farmers manage their own situation. The leftists and to some-extent the centrists wanted complete agricultural centralization.

  • @josephshorr6781
    @josephshorr6781 Рік тому +1

    69k views. Nice.

  • @RG_Errorr
    @RG_Errorr Рік тому +1

    RIP Queen Lizzy😔😔

  • @jhontorfinn
    @jhontorfinn Рік тому +3

    It's been patches

  • @jozopako
    @jozopako Рік тому +3

    GOD SAVE THE QUEEN. RIP