(VIDEO 2) Non-Precision Approaches
Вставка
- Опубліковано 14 жов 2024
- UND CFI Anthony Bottini guides you through the necessary steps and procedures that must be followed to fly a safe, UND Aerospace-standardized Non-precision Approach procedure in the UND Garmin 1000-equipped Cessna 172. "Ed. 2" includes changes to pilot callouts made on the UND standardized profile for the Non-precision Approach. A huge thanks goes out to Dr. Harro Heilmann from Stuttgart, Germany for his amazing in-flight photos of different German castles as well as some great shots of the Matterhorn summit!
Hi, thanks for your comment and your interest in our series. The G1000 is actually an awesome tool for our students. It helps to teach about modern avionics and glass cockpit procedures, which is a vital skill set that's needed by our graduates when they make it to more advanced cockpits. In fact, the PFD utilizes all of the needles; ILS, VOR, bearing selectors and everything is hand flown as our Cessna's are not equipped with autopilot. Hope this clears it up. Fly safe!!
"Sioux" is the call-sign used by UND aircraft and is in the FAA Telephony directory. "Sioux Niner" was a Cirrus SR-20 and is now the call-sign for a Cessna 172.
What an excellent video. Thanks for posting and congratulations from Caracas, Venezuela.
Anthony has a sad puppy face in all his videos and I love it xD
Excellent video, thank you UND
Good tip to calculate a VDP 7:18
Wow, you really load up a single pilot with all of your multi-crew call outs. I don't think it is appropriate for a single-pilot IFR flight where total concentration is required during an instrument approach, especially a non-precision approach. Most of those calls would be made by the PNF in a multi-crew environment. The majority of the pre-landing actions as required by the checklist should be performed prior to the commencement of the approach. In cloud is no time for distractions.
guys, UND is a 100% female flight school
I don't think "he" would be appropriate to describe the women flying the aircraft for 90% of the flight shots in the video.
fux off
01:52 pretty terrible radio call. Adding in unnecessary "for" and "to" is unprofessional although some lazy commercial pilots still do it.
If you think this was terrible, you'd probably faint if you heard most radio calls.
Watched the video? The pilot is a woman. Are you overcompensating? Get real is something you should do, have you any idea of how many female pilots there are? Pilots welcome everyone (with a brain) to the club.
LOL No kidding. Like 98% of all pilots are men. What is this? Preconditioning? I've got no problem with women who fly, or want to fly, but extremely apropos: "Get Real."
A G1000? Really? How about some VORs and Localizers. Lets show some needle flying because that is hou you truly learn instrument skills. Any bozo can look at a moving map and program an autopilot...
I'll agree with *CarolineAnn20* on this one. To transcribe TWO NINER as *"SIOUX NINER"* (0:43 and again at 01:00 - a company name was probably edited out of the audio clip) shows a complete, utter lack of aviation knowledge. Please, please, get that *"SIOUX"* removed from the graphics ASAP. Having such a gross error in a presumably educational video can't be good for your business.
"Sioux" is the UND call sign. This was not an error. I have a reply from about a year ago that also addresses this exact concern. No editing of the call, it is accurate.
Michael Lents Thanks for clarifying, I stand corrected. That said, it is a bit odd to have an educational video show such an un-ordinary callsign without so much of a reference to the fact that it is the standard UND call sign (a fact well-known to UND insiders but not to the general UA-cam audience). A simple overlaid text mentioning the fact could prevent future confusion. If anything, this exchange of ours will serve the purpose of clarifying this to future viewers anyway.
corisco tupi. Thank you for your reply. As you mentioned, the call sign is not as widely known outside our sector. I, too, hope our exchange promotes better understanding of the content. Safe flying!
"She"? Come on, get real.
Sioux? Sioux!?! Dear Lord... It's TWO Niner! TWO Niner!!!!! The NUMBER TWO!!!!! Do you get it!?! My gosh. Get a person doing the graphics who knows what's being said, or at least knows the Pilot's phonetic alphabet, and WHY we have it! (Like IF it were "S9", it would be SIERRA, so it wouldn't sound like TWO!!) At the VERY least, find someone to PROOF this, that knows what's going on! SIOUX??? Oh yeah. Some chick came up with that one. (A clueless dude would have written "Sue". LOL) : P
Cousin Sioux is their callsign. The video is correct. The abbreviated callsign for tail numbers is the last three identifiers, not two. Your rant makes you look like the idiot that you are.
LOL! Just came across this. This "rant" (and the comment above it) was being completely sarcastic. It was also written by Caroline (my other half : ) when she had this account in her name, which has since been changed to cousin. (We both used to use it.) Also, I see that the other comments that both these posts were pertaining to, have since been deleted, so they are not here now. You make contrary assumptions to some things that were very obvious, in my opinion. Caroline is also an excellent & experienced pilot. So you don't know us, but I'd venture to say that you've given enough info (calling people names) to show that truly YOU are the idiot!
^insane person