Top 5 Twin-Engine Turboprop Passenger Aircraft | Price & Specs

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 66

  • @AviationFederation
    @AviationFederation  2 роки тому +5

    *What experience do you have with any of these twin-engine turboprops? Are these really well-suited as passenger aircraft as they are promoted to be? How would you assess their performance? Let us know down below! To see more interesting aircraft, check these out:*
    Watch more of my videos here: bit.ly/3aq1yi5
    Top 5 Single-Engine Turboprop Aircraft Over $1M 2022-2023 | Aircraft Comparison
    ua-cam.com/video/Wn2oE231VLw/v-deo.html&t
    Top 5 Most Expensive Turboprops 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
    ua-cam.com/video/TOz14LOo-hE/v-deo.html
    Top 5 Fastest Turboprops 2021-2022 | Price & Specs
    ua-cam.com/video/IlwIybxx9w0/v-deo.html&t

  • @heaye
    @heaye 2 роки тому +10

    5. Skydiving
    4. Fedex
    3. Vip
    2. King
    1. Bus

  • @kevinbarry71
    @kevinbarry71 2 роки тому +17

    The last one really isn't in the same class. If you're going to mention it you really should have mentioned the Dash 8 q400 which is a great plane

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  2 роки тому +1

      Fair enough! Thanks for the feedback!

    • @largol33t1
      @largol33t1 Рік тому

      The Q400 is probably an easy plane to fly. Remember, this was the make/model that was stolen when a Horizon Air employee took one for a joyride before crashing it into the sea. RIP Beebo.

    • @largol33t1
      @largol33t1 Рік тому

      PS: the figher pilots sent to intercept it were shocked that it could actually perform a barrel roll. Not easy to do for a twin turboprop with straight wings! That is a testament to its construction and its design team.

  • @5CGQ
    @5CGQ 2 роки тому +5

    At 0:20 sec "... jet fuel prices are going up." Don't turboprops use the same fuel as jets? Am I missing something here?

  • @jeromeavila3195
    @jeromeavila3195 2 роки тому +3

    Nice design Avante Evo!

  • @joemclaughlin995
    @joemclaughlin995 2 роки тому +5

    Fuel consumption seems to be the deciding factor in aviation these days! Years ago I travelled frequently on the Shorts SD360 which was an incredible aircraft that offered acres of space to the passengers and could withstand manys a heavy landing. I also remember on many an occasion being surrounded by the chirps of day old chickens.

  • @timk4502
    @timk4502 Рік тому +3

    Piaggio P180 or the King Air 360 are my 2 tops.
    Either will be a good sidekick to the Pilatus 24 I'll be buying...!

  • @patshes1951
    @patshes1951 2 роки тому +8

    These are big boy toys . A lot of money at play here, but they are beautifull. My personal choice is the single turbine Kodiak although single engines are not featured here. Although I am all for the twinotter . A real workhorse.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  2 роки тому

      Indeed! Excellent choices there. The Twin Otter is definitely one of our favourites here.

    • @FSEVENMAN
      @FSEVENMAN 2 роки тому +1

      Why are you commenting about singles when they're talking about twins?

  • @arielleblond6201
    @arielleblond6201 2 роки тому +3

    ATR 42 earns a lot in short distances below 600 kms. It's a workhorse. My favourite is the TBM's family single engine.

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 11 місяців тому +1

    The ATR has the same seating capacity of a Greyhound bus if you want to fly a bus full of people to destination.

  • @billsales7237
    @billsales7237 2 роки тому +1

    King Air 360. Have a lot of time in the King Aires you just can’t beat them.

  • @agehalolita8321
    @agehalolita8321 2 роки тому +3

    Airliner and private aircraft are included in this category. I think it's better they are separated.

  • @cassianoalvesmoreira9583
    @cassianoalvesmoreira9583 2 роки тому +2

    Muito bom gosto desse canal sempre acompanho

  • @kresimirmilisa5560
    @kresimirmilisa5560 2 роки тому +7

    piaggio p180 is choice for me.

    • @keithwalker6892
      @keithwalker6892 3 місяці тому

      The ATR has had I think 2 or more fatal accidents in USA and Brazil and should in my opinion not be flying in passenger use . I would not fly on it

    • @keithwalker6892
      @keithwalker6892 3 місяці тому

      The ATR should be replaced by the DHC8-400

  • @tonyrotzler63
    @tonyrotzler63 5 місяців тому

    What is the ATR doing in this List?

  • @michaelleonard140
    @michaelleonard140 3 місяці тому

    I have flown the King Air 90, 100B and 200. I really enjoyed flying the 200 the most. I believe flying the King Air 360 would be a real kick in the pants 😂😂!!

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  3 місяці тому

      That’s incredible! What did you like most about flying Beechcraft planes?

  • @1minutecomicswalahollywood648
    @1minutecomicswalahollywood648 2 роки тому +3

    Obsessed with takeoffs & landings.

  • @fatbowe
    @fatbowe 2 роки тому +1

    I like the beechcraft..

  • @TwinTiger88
    @TwinTiger88 4 місяці тому

    the Kingair 360 er is the ticket !!

  • @ubermenschen3636
    @ubermenschen3636 Рік тому +4

    ATR is too big for most buyer of this category. Go with Piaggio; it’s fast, highest cruise ceiling, and reasonably priced.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Certainly, the ATR aircraft may be considered too large for some buyers or regional operators in this category. In that case, the Piaggio aircraft is a great choice. With those features, the Piaggio provides a compelling option for those seeking a more suitable aircraft in terms of size and performance.

    • @jamesbuckingham8073
      @jamesbuckingham8073 Рік тому

      Plus the Piaggio is a chic magnet

  • @randyreynolds1045
    @randyreynolds1045 2 роки тому +2

    The King Air is the best choice!

  • @Altenholz
    @Altenholz 2 роки тому +1

    In terms of size and passenger numbers, the ATR is probably in a completely different class to the rest of the aircraft.

  • @waelwael4783
    @waelwael4783 2 роки тому +1

    I like your job but I have a small remark regarding this video
    You are not making the right classification:
    -combining light turbo engines a/c with medium
    -passenger planes with private/business

  • @Perich29
    @Perich29 11 місяців тому

    If I have a choice, I'll take the Cessna Sky Courier, good study speed, fixed landing gear, and could be used to take people on the route from Las Vegas NV to St, George UT since no airlines flies that route today.

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  11 місяців тому

      The Cessna SkyCourier does seem like a versatile and practical option for various purposes, including regional routes where commercial flights might not be available. Its fixed landing gear and good cruising speed make it suitable for such missions. Is there anything else about the SkyCourier or any other aircraft that you find interesting or noteworthy?

  • @therusticcollectionebaysto7028
    @therusticcollectionebaysto7028 2 роки тому

    New sub! Liked 😊✌️🤭🤭😉

  • @winfriedg
    @winfriedg 2 роки тому

    The Piaggio P180 is flying here sometimes. It makes a very loud and unpleasen noise. Sorry to say that negative about this special and interesting constraction.

  • @killingfields1424
    @killingfields1424 2 роки тому +1

    Your number 1 is out of league to the category of the others in the list. Infact you prefer to validate their ranking according to longevity in production when you position the P180 Avanti behind the older yet latest King Air.

  • @진형김-b5t
    @진형김-b5t Рік тому

    프로펠러 비행기가 멋있다

  • @cactusforever7198
    @cactusforever7198 2 роки тому

    I was pic on twin otter in SAUDIA Arabia
    True STOL Air craft

  • @Ditos12
    @Ditos12 2 роки тому +1

    How is the DHC-8 Q400 not on first place 😭😭😭

    • @h2oski1200
      @h2oski1200 2 роки тому

      that's first place on the "Top 1 planes stolen by Sky King" video

  • @peterkondoa5152
    @peterkondoa5152 8 місяців тому

    Twin otter still the best"

  • @davidescobar5366
    @davidescobar5366 Рік тому

    I dont get why airplanes like these cannot have three engines instead of two?
    I mean twin turbos technically are said to be safer than single engine planes given if one engine fails the other can probably help the plane land but suppose a third engine is added on the nose? Wouldn't this engine make this plane safer still?
    An engine that can run independent of the other two? At altitude perhaps it can also be used on its own to propell the plane forward hence saving fuel also?
    The other two engines to take off and land and or if time is of the essence to fly faster? Or if bothcother two engines fail the third nose engine can land the plane also?
    I just think that engineers limit themselves on the capabilities of airplanes or modern tech to make airplanes more fuel efficient and perhaps safer at the same time.

  • @stacyevans1360
    @stacyevans1360 2 роки тому

    If you just want to pay a mx bill and not fly get the P180. I fly the KA 350, it's the king.

  • @bernhardecklin7005
    @bernhardecklin7005 2 роки тому

    Interesting and good explanations. But please..these are all AIRPLANES!!!!!!! When will most of you aviation journalists refer to the specific term of AIRPLANE instead of the generic aircraft?????

  • @killingfields1424
    @killingfields1424 2 роки тому

    P180 Avanti Evo

  • @FSEVENMAN
    @FSEVENMAN 2 роки тому

    Expensive twin turbos LOL 😆 As opposed to the inexpensive???

  • @arjunamencari56
    @arjunamencari56 Рік тому

    N219 is the best

  • @gabrielmeneghetti1474
    @gabrielmeneghetti1474 2 роки тому

    This channel would be so much better if it used human numbers!

  • @stevenflattum156
    @stevenflattum156 2 роки тому

    Twin turbo’s how about twin turbines. Title is wrong.

  • @crazyfroggie6546
    @crazyfroggie6546 Рік тому

    The twin otter and cessna are too closely matched

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  Рік тому

      Indeed! While both aircraft have their strengths and appeal to different types of pilots and operators, their rankings can vary depending on specific criteria, mission requirements, operating conditions, and personal preferences. In our case, we reserve an editorial approach taking into account our writers' individual preferences.

  • @ntebohisengnkuatsana5208
    @ntebohisengnkuatsana5208 2 роки тому

    ATR 42 - 600 is not this class in my opinion.
    Where is Dornie 228NG?

  • @moejaime2654
    @moejaime2654 11 місяців тому

    I FLY A GOONIE BIRD WITH A RUBBER BAND HAS AN ENGINE !

    • @AviationFederation
      @AviationFederation  11 місяців тому

      Flying a rubber band-powered goonie bird? Now, that's a unique experience! How does the thrill of winding up the rubber band compare to the power of modern aircraft engines?

    • @moejaime2654
      @moejaime2654 11 місяців тому

      @@AviationFederation Sorry the pilot that wrote the previous message is dead !

    • @moejaime2654
      @moejaime2654 11 місяців тому

      @@AviationFederation P.S He died with bugs in his teeth !

  • @eylonemuskson4177
    @eylonemuskson4177 Рік тому

    King Air is so overrated. The cabin is tiny.
    Buy a Pilatus PC-12 for that price and deal with onky one engine for maintenance. PT6A is so reliable you really dont need two

  • @sumantriabiyoso9771
    @sumantriabiyoso9771 Рік тому

    Cn 219

  • @jonhseven133
    @jonhseven133 Рік тому

    Stay out of Millionaire in Addison... New ownership has its ways of recording too much...

  • @allangamayev3614
    @allangamayev3614 2 роки тому

    !!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • @rhonest5097
    @rhonest5097 9 днів тому

    None are worth buying the asking price

  • @chrispoeschl7564
    @chrispoeschl7564 2 роки тому +2

    “For I did not know, who I was about to save - until I looked in the mirror…” Christopher G. Poeschl Stay Amazing…
    COVID-19 Inspiration…❤️
    The Florist…🌹
    07-29-22 4 53 pm
    Loved it’