I wish you would spend 15 minutes in research before posting these videos. The Epic E1000 GX has a max cruise speed of 333 KTS which is 383 mph, not 325 mph like you have in the video. Also, you are talking about the Epic while showing video clips of the M600 an other airplanes. Just really annoys me to see these type of videos where the poster spends so little time on the content and could care less if it is accurate or not.
4:50 ‘it’s a tandem seat cockpit allowing the pilot and trainee to sit side by side’, as the screen shows us the real configuration…🤦🏻♂️🤷♂️😂 This is garbage AI pushed out to make quick money for a lazy idiot…
Overall good information, with corrections needed as described above. One more - incorrect to say “side-by-side” for the tandem cockpit aircraft, although subsequent verbiage did clarify the obvious “tandem” seating. Suggest deleting “side-by-side” in the initial description of seating configuration.
If combining military trainers and GA wasn’t confusing enough, the planes are ranked 10 to 1 but not by speed, all speeds are in MPH, and terms you think you know like “tandem seating” have new and sometimes opposite definitions. Enjoy!
The actual fastest turbo prop aircraft is "Turbulence" designed and built by Mike Patey of Utah. He built this aircraft from scratch. It is powered by a 1090 horsepower PT-6 SERIES 42 engine and his cruise speed is 420 mph at 17,500 feet. He has set the speed record for the fastest turbo prop aircraft transit across the continental United States and has several dozen records to his name.
There are a lot of error in the speed announced; you are confusing knots and MPH…… and you should specify if you are talking in miles or Nautical Miles, lot’s of errors
Why do you keep saying that the Beechcraft T-6 Texan has a spacious side cockpit? Am I missing something? Or are you confused about what constitutes a side by side cockpit configuration? Is there a version that has a side by side configuration like the A-1 Skyrader, also known as a Sandy?
The thing is narrators always quote HP what should always most importantly say is torque. Torque is what can turns a big prop and HP carry’s it plus other things. Torque is king on power. That’s the magic secret of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine. Massive torque that made it King of aero engines!!!
How can leave the Turbine Legend off this list? If the PC-21 earns top spot, a Garrett 331-10 powered Legend making 1150/shp will outperform every AC on this list
About the PC21NGX. You are saying that it is powered by a PT6A-68B. I am confused because you are showing a GE M601-H80 engine. Now, tell me what the truth is about the engine.
As a pilot and mech, I can safely say that WW2 aircraft, F4U, P51, etc., did not motor along at 300+ mph. Yes, topped out, they could hit the 400 or so. The engines had a combat life well below 200 +/- combat hours. Where a Garrett or PT6 has well over 2000 hrs plus depending on the "program," it's on. I absolutely would love a Bearcat!!!
Ummm ~ I don't know about any other numbers, but the PC-21 has a quoted top speed (manufacturer's claim) of 426 mph. That's a lot faster than the 370 you cite. If you convert between statute miles and knotts, you're going in the wrong direction anyway ~ en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilatus_PC-21#Specifications_(PC-21)
![Lp. Сердце Вселенной #60 РОЖДЕНИЕ ЛОЛОЛОШКИ [Финал] • Майнкрафт](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/YoR0pAV9FVQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Click here to watch ➡ 10 Cheapest Airplanes Anyone Can Buy In 2023
ua-cam.com/video/qzjTMokBtUY/v-deo.html
I wish you would spend 15 minutes in research before posting these videos. The Epic E1000 GX has a max cruise speed of 333 KTS which is 383 mph, not 325 mph like you have in the video. Also, you are talking about the Epic while showing video clips of the M600 an other airplanes. Just really annoys me to see these type of videos where the poster spends so little time on the content and could care less if it is accurate or not.
HYPERBOLIC speech to the next level also.
the script is ChatGPT written. This entire channel is AI.
I was going to make some of the same complaints and more but you've got it covered 😁😁
4:50 ‘it’s a tandem seat cockpit allowing the pilot and trainee to sit side by side’, as the screen shows us the real configuration…🤦🏻♂️🤷♂️😂 This is garbage AI pushed out to make quick money for a lazy idiot…
"Boasts a side-by-side cockpit..." while showing tandem front/back setup. Ugh.
Amazing, every engine is robust and has a remarkable range.
"Tandem side by side seating..."😂😂😂
The words are synonymous now
For a while now, Mike Patey's Turbulence is the fastest single engine turboprop aircraft at a little over 370knots.
yes in till mike brakes it for the engine will be worked on and?
T-6 Texan is not "side by side " seating
You forgot Mike Patey's Turbulence.
Good Details
It would have been better if average fuel burn at cruise speeds are mentioned
Thank you for your comment. We will keep this in mind for future videos!
I just can't let it go ... The volume of errors in this video is astounding.
"a tandem cockpit that allows pilots to sit side by side ?????" HUH???
@@justadreamin1004 I stopped counting ...
Overall good information, with corrections needed as described above. One more - incorrect to say “side-by-side” for the tandem cockpit aircraft, although subsequent verbiage did clarify the obvious “tandem” seating. Suggest deleting “side-by-side” in the initial description of seating configuration.
How can you say side by side when in 2 instances they're clearly tandem seating
Nice video but you would do well to stop referring to tandem seating as side by side.
A-I does it again !!!
You forgott Mike Pateys Turbolance.
If combining military trainers and GA wasn’t confusing enough, the planes are ranked 10 to 1 but not by speed, all speeds are in MPH, and terms you think you know like “tandem seating” have new and sometimes opposite definitions.
Enjoy!
Pilots sits side by side??? Or one behind the other.?
There is a Pilatus PC12 NGX but is there a Pilatus P21 NGX? Confusion there!
The actual fastest turbo prop aircraft is "Turbulence" designed and built by Mike Patey of Utah. He built this aircraft from scratch. It is powered by a 1090 horsepower PT-6 SERIES 42 engine and his cruise speed is 420 mph at 17,500 feet. He has set the speed record for the fastest turbo prop aircraft transit across the continental United States and has several dozen records to his name.
There are a lot of error in the speed announced; you are confusing knots and MPH…… and you should specify if you are talking in miles or Nautical Miles, lot’s of errors
The T-6 has tandem seating!!
Look up side by side and tandem please
The stats on the Pilatus PC12NG are incorrect cruise is 280 knots or 322 mile per hour.
What in the world do you mean it's tandem seating side by side?????
T-6 Texan is tandem seating, not side by side. :)
Why do you keep saying that the Beechcraft T-6 Texan has a spacious side cockpit? Am I missing something? Or are you confused about what constitutes a side by side cockpit configuration? Is there a version that has a side by side configuration like the A-1 Skyrader, also known as a Sandy?
The thing is narrators always quote HP what should always most importantly say is torque. Torque is what can turns a big prop and HP carry’s it plus other things. Torque is king on power. That’s the magic secret of the Rolls Royce Merlin engine. Massive torque that made it King of aero engines!!!
How can leave the Turbine Legend off this list? If the PC-21 earns top spot, a Garrett 331-10 powered Legend making 1150/shp will outperform every AC on this list
Of course not, the Pilatus PC21 is Powered by a PT6A-68B / 1600 SHP
Says side by side showes 1 in the front and 1 in the back lol
Its not side by side - Tacano
have a nice day. Seat 4. Cruising speed is 250 mph. range 2500 km. new. please price. thanks.
whats a terber prop?
Soooo...Pratt and Whitney makes turbo prop engines?
Que paso con el CESSNA DENALI?
About the PC21NGX. You are saying that it is powered by a PT6A-68B. I am confused because you are showing a GE M601-H80 engine. Now, tell me what the truth is about the engine.
Your speeds are wrong they should be in knots not miles per hour. For instance that pc-21 is 370 kts which is 426mph.
Turbulence 4 is faster.
I do not think that many of the words you used mean what you think they mean.
Dude you need to be talking in knots not MPH
@3:10 side by side?!!!!
Terberprops?
In aviation we are using kts not mph !
very impressive. But none of these can outpace a WW2 P51D or P47 😊
As a pilot and mech, I can safely say that WW2 aircraft, F4U, P51, etc., did not motor along at 300+ mph. Yes, topped out, they could hit the 400 or so. The engines had a combat life well below 200 +/- combat hours. Where a Garrett or PT6 has well over 2000 hrs plus depending on the "program," it's on. I absolutely would love a Bearcat!!!
@ All of u: Thanks to artificial intelligence, we can enjoy the low level of AI-generated UA-cam videos for a long time to come. Hallelujah.
Lame list. The brasislan Tucanos are the fastest turboprop. Read more before posting your videos
No. The American Turbulence 4 is faster. Sorry.
AI trash
Ummm ~ I don't know about any other numbers, but the PC-21 has a quoted top speed (manufacturer's claim) of 426 mph. That's a lot faster than the 370 you cite.
If you convert between statute miles and knotts, you're going in the wrong direction anyway ~
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pilatus_PC-21#Specifications_(PC-21)