1) Why would this have no support? It sounds like you have to generate support in both directions now instead of only one that was mostly held up by the resin in the printer. 2) The entire middle build plate is support so there is more post processing than normal. Obviously we would all have to see this validated with real hardware but on the surface this seems to add complexity with very little upside.
Also, MAP is not applicable for any existing SLA technology, as stated at 1:38, since it requires a laser on both sides of the print bed, so you need a new printer., as shown at 0:58. If you have a real sample of this it would be great to see.
If anyone wanted to double the speed, I think they would just buy two printers :/ This way you don't have to deal with a huge support base to remove from every single print. If you somehow manage to make this costs less than 2 printers of the same size and have it work just as reliably, which I find unlikely, just remove one half and you are suddenly market leader.
yeah DLP has a cure time of what... 6 seconds per layer? at 0.05mm that is 2 minutes per milimeter, or 1 minute for 0.1mm layers. SLA is similarly fast i think. Slower on full layers and quicker on small. the thing that takes time today is the peeling between layers, and i'm not sure how this changes that? by holding it on the original buildplate (center plane)?
1:21 Eh guys, the grid just disappeared. Unless it performs real magic, you need to explain what happens there, in your advertisement. Because now it's simply misleading. Also, how long does it take to print the grid part? I'm getting the feeling this diminishes the print speed advantage for a lot of projects. I dare you to match it against a Bambu Lab.
1) Why would this have no support? It sounds like you have to generate support in both directions now instead of only one that was mostly held up by the resin in the printer.
2) The entire middle build plate is support so there is more post processing than normal.
Obviously we would all have to see this validated with real hardware but on the surface this seems to add complexity with very little upside.
Interesting. But.. Define multi directional? They both move along the same axis?
Very interesting concept! may be the beginning of something big.
Also, MAP is not applicable for any existing SLA technology, as stated at 1:38, since it requires a laser on both sides of the print bed, so you need a new printer., as shown at 0:58.
If you have a real sample of this it would be great to see.
If anyone wanted to double the speed, I think they would just buy two printers :/
This way you don't have to deal with a huge support base to remove from every single print.
If you somehow manage to make this costs less than 2 printers of the same size and have it work just as reliably, which I find unlikely, just remove one half and you are suddenly market leader.
Print speed is not the problem holding SLA back, this is dead on arrival.
yeah DLP has a cure time of what... 6 seconds per layer? at 0.05mm that is 2 minutes per milimeter, or 1 minute for 0.1mm layers.
SLA is similarly fast i think. Slower on full layers and quicker on small.
the thing that takes time today is the peeling between layers, and i'm not sure how this changes that? by holding it on the original buildplate (center plane)?
1:21 Eh guys, the grid just disappeared. Unless it performs real magic, you need to explain what happens there, in your advertisement. Because now it's simply misleading. Also, how long does it take to print the grid part? I'm getting the feeling this diminishes the print speed advantage for a lot of projects. I dare you to match it against a Bambu Lab.
if one head can print in that speed why go the other direction , if its a continues print