subscribers don't say anything about quality of content though...they are no fancy fittnes influencers thats the problem i think. i like it the way it is :)
I'm curious why you recommend 6 reps as a lower bound when the research indicates that 5 reps is also equivalent and also has better carry over for strength adaptations?
with the graph on the screen being specified as “until volitional failure” i feel like there’s still a case to be made for possibly favouring higher reps in reality. the population being studied wasn’t mentioned so if the majority of those studied weren’t highly experienced then their estimate of failure would’ve been so far off with high reps that it wouldn’t be a true representation, in my opinion. and how about their cardiovascular fitness? did any of those test that prior to the experiment? maybe if people with solid cardio are tested with high reps it’d help avoid that being the limiting factor and they’d end up getting more stimulus with high reps?
Cool! What about myo-reps or rest-pause methods, where there might be only 5 reps or even 3 reps in the mini-sets? Will they produce the great effect comparing with standard 10 reps set (considering that RIR is the same)? Should we consider those mini-sets in myo-reps and a effective set or not?
This is gold and i really wish you guys had more subscribers. Well articulated, thank you Dr. Helms
subscribers don't say anything about quality of content though...they are no fancy fittnes influencers thats the problem i think. i like it the way it is :)
Love 3dmj, would love to see more about specialization programming for bodybuilders, assessing physiques and needs
I also Loce 3dmj,
@@mabc009 thanks didnt see the typo
All love. GLHF@@GuaridoNutri
This is awesome thank you Eric
I’m loving hearing about training research to apply to the discipline that has been by my side for 15+ years 🙏💪🏼
I enjoyed this. Quick and thorough and teaching already passionate gym bros like myself something they never knew.
nothing better than pure scinence and the knowledge came from.
appreciated.
Nice one Ezza mate.
I just love these guys
Phenomenal video! 🙏
Perfect take on my life philosophy of, “more math isn’t necessarily better!” 😂
What do you think about combining approaches and counting the tonnage of “effective reps”, or the tonnage of the last 5 reps of every working set?
I'm curious why you recommend 6 reps as a lower bound when the research indicates that 5 reps is also equivalent and also has better carry over for strength adaptations?
with the graph on the screen being specified as “until volitional failure” i feel like there’s still a case to be made for possibly favouring higher reps in reality. the population being studied wasn’t mentioned so if the majority of those studied weren’t highly experienced then their estimate of failure would’ve been so far off with high reps that it wouldn’t be a true representation, in my opinion.
and how about their cardiovascular fitness? did any of those test that prior to the experiment? maybe if people with solid cardio are tested with high reps it’d help avoid that being the limiting factor and they’d end up getting more stimulus with high reps?
What is RPE? I missed that part
It is a scale that measures effort. RPE 10 is max effort. You couldn't do any more reps.
Cool! What about myo-reps or rest-pause methods, where there might be only 5 reps or even 3 reps in the mini-sets? Will they produce the great effect comparing with standard 10 reps set (considering that RIR is the same)? Should we consider those mini-sets in myo-reps and a effective set or not?
Main thing against volume load is you can't compare different exercises
Agreed. Squats vs leg extensions to the same RPE is quite different