Facial Recognition: Last Week Tonight with John Oliver (HBO)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
- John Oliver takes a look at facial recognition technology, how it’s used by private companies and law enforcement, and why it can be dangerous.
Connect with Last Week Tonight online...
Subscribe to the Last Week Tonight UA-cam channel for more almost news as it almost happens: / lastweektonight
Find Last Week Tonight on Facebook like your mom would: lastweektonight
Follow us on Twitter for news about jokes and jokes about news: lastweektonight
Visit our official site for all that other stuff at once: www.hbo.com/lastweektonight
Alright you guys, I'll see you all back here in 5 to 6 years when this has become a HUGE problem and we say, "Wow, 5 years since John Oliver touched this topic and still nothing has been done."
Yeah, I am still waiting for you to fix the WWE problem.
As is tradition
nice.
This is us rn on his old shit 😂😂😂
I didn't understand something in the video. Isn't it a good thing that we're able to arrest people with warrants out for their arrest? John Oliver is making it sound like a bad thing.
"it's like Skynet only not evil" is the exact kind of thing evil Skynet would say.
LOL
do you know what a stable time loop is?
Was it lost on them that SkyNet was *also* "good" until it decided to murder all of humanity?
cyrad exactly
I literally watched Terminator 2 for the first time yesterday, so this comment is much appreciated
“It’s not good at identifying black or Asian people.”
Me: I don’t know if that’s good or bad...
“This student was misidentified as a terrorist.”
Me: Oh. It’s bad.
Yeah, if it meant BLM protesters were immune, then we could at least laugh at how one of the bad uses was failing, but, unfortunately, that'a not what bad at identifying black of asian people had meant...
@@youtubeuniversity3638 well protesters can just wear masks
My actual train of thought as that was revealed: “That sounds like a good thing, unless it’s a really bad thing.”
@De Acre kill cops?
@De Acre don't know, maybe keep them from "losing" their bodycams and hiding their nametag and number. Oh and also hold them accountable for their shit.
Would be a good start imo
When that reporters high school photo came up you could see him looking for a word other than "horrifying" all over his face.
He didn't want to be unprofessional and ruin the rest of the interview. That's the face of someone who has just been personally attacked and is mentally cataloguing the weapons he has available to fight back with.
Funny thing is that in a book about clearview from Kashmir hill, is written that the creators of Clearview uploaded for people they want to impress (such as celebrities and entrepeneurs) extra personal pictures, that they searched without AI beforehand, so that they would be impressed.
"It's like Skynet but not evil." Well, even in the movie the people who built Skynet thought it wasn't evil...
Funny how this is both Frightening Ironic, and arrogantly stupid. I guess it's true, human beings are going to fucking destroy themselves.
@@drunkensailor3736 They might? Yea meanwhile the US is using teargas, beatings and rubber bullets? That is no thought is it? That is in fact just scary. You missed the corpses being forklifted into trucks in the US?
It's as if they didn't even watch the movie at all XD
@@drunkensailor3736 I heard that China is already using this facial recognition technology for their Social Credit System. They might start using it to quell the protests in Hong Kong. Scary thought. Actually came across a great analysis of the situation in Hong Kong and the future of those protests: ua-cam.com/video/uMm67LHxR7M/v-deo.html
It wasn't even "evil". It just extrapolated game theory and applied military strategy to the most likely outcome, then found a shorter way to the most optimal outcome. Basically it thought "these monkeys are all going to kill each other no matter what I do, so I should get it over with now so that at least I can survive." Who knows, maybe it had a rehabilitation of humanity planned, something similar to "Mother".
Anyway, holy shit did that guy miss the whole point.
I bet John's just scared that Adam Driver's home security is going to be able to identify him while he's hiding in his bushes at night
Thank you for making me laugh 😁
Now this is a comment
HAHAHA - good stuff!
Let's be real, this has already happened.
Likely what prompted this episode ;)
You know a service is scary if Facebook is the good guy in the story.
Damn
😌
Your easily bought off I see😒
Only until FB gets its cut or make it its partner...
😓
there's a big difference between a "brown university student" and a "Brown University student"
Oh no you didn’t!
well. she was both
Triple snap thumbs way the hell up!
Brown University Student has longer life expectancy than the other one...
U r doomed if u r a brown Brown University student...
"It's like Skynet but not evil." That's exactly what an evil one would say.
thats what skynet themselves first said
Plot twist ...SkyNet was chinese all along...not sure if self fulfilling prophecy or what.
Skynet is Genysis!
skynet is also a delivery company too
I don't think Skynet sees itself as "evil" either.
No one listened to Snowden, not even when John interviewed him. Sadly, but unsurprisingly, no one will move a finger this time either.
If you give up, you've already lost.
People likes being bystanders 🤷🏾♂️
The bleats of sheep is always ignored.
Probably need a world wide resistance to crash the world wide computer systems.
A huge part of the problem is that a lot of people don't recognize the consequences. They're either uninformed or stupid. People only react to things that have immediate consequences.
It's like the boiled frog experiment.
Me: man this year sucks, how much worse can it get?
*Skynet is literally a thing now*
skynet been a thing tho for a few years now
@@Pomagranite167 I love your username!
Google: Gorgon stare
HAAAA
@HeyNowLookHere 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Those poor orcs can't even enjoy a bottle of wine without the eye of Sauron constantly judging them
Wine? That's MAN-BLOOD!
Those poor orcs. Always blame the elves, not Sauron. Never Him ;)
They just wanted meat back on the menu
As long as you don't mispronounce "Sauron" like John did.
Looks like privacy invasion is back on the menu, boys!
its funny how george orwell's book is being used as a manual rather than a warning
Please remember Huxley's book too. The only reason these guys have images to scrape, is because humanity found a cheap way to take photographs and immediately we thought that, taking and displaying photos of our own faces, was the most important thing in the world. While Big Brother was getting better at watching us, we were too busy watching 'Big Brother' (and Love Island and The Real World(?), X-Factor...)
Yes but who is responsible?
Did you even read 1984?
They're not using it as a manual, they would be doing this now regardless. Orwell saw that this could happen. The fact that we have people getting pissed about it and see the future and current ramifications for letting it happen means the warning is working as intended. Now its just up to us as people to decide if we have the willpower to stop it.
Hey, Same image!
"Arguing that you don't care about the right to privacy because you have nothing to hide is no different than saying you don't care about free speech because you have nothing to say." - Edward Snowden
Yet most police officers have the phone numbers and addresses hidden from any public directory.
oma simba, Those who fail to protect to protect their "rights", will have no "rights" to protect.
I mean every country has freedom of speach. Not every country has that freedom afterwards.
@@eleson00 yeah well its to avoid repercussions and similar.
Also note the implied 'right now' after both hide and say. Sure, a lot 2nd amendmentists don't care about the 1st amendment right now since they are against the protests, but those people would suddenly start caring if the 2nd was violated!
The "funny" thing about facial recognition and collecting data is this: Quite a lot of terrorists who commited terrorist attacks in Germany between 2014 - 2017 were known by the police, they were already in their system but it did not help to prevent the attacks. So it's just mind-boggling to me, that there are people who think giving more data to the state will make our lives safer. To me it seems the police can't even handle the data they already have. It's not about collecting more data but to better analyse the data that is collected..
Indeed, like most justifications involving "terrorism", it's really just an excuse for more authoritarianism.
And in Slovakia, there was a huge scandal about some 'people of very very questionable character' bribing police officers to get access into police databases and collect data on their enemies such as journalists reporting on them.
i'm not entirely plugged in.. on how such 'basic' A.I. ..that too.. often 'flawed' A.I. can ever have a fair shot at 'preventing' mishaps or sinster things.
i think.. for that we had better got 'ears to the ground' ... informer networks and better intercept tech.
maybe even hack encryption based messenger services.. (whats ufffap)
i know from experience or seeing how Bombay police changed.
prior to the 1990s communal/religious riots and all
the police literally had ample imformer networks and solving high-voltage cases was .. to a great extent.. dependent on human intel.
things dwindles after the trust was broken.. or Muslims often saw the state as being partial.. if not the oppressor.
informers too receeded to the background. (many from the lower strata of society or living on tge fringes.. or even being part of crime syndicates/ gangs).
and obviouslt.. now crime is often decentralised.
like.. in xase of terror attacks here.. often it takes a "sleeper cell" of juat 4-5 localised people who might otherwise have regular day jobs.
skilled, highly educated people too can and do get systematicallylured or brain washed in the name of allegedly/real atrocities agsinst their sect/ group/ religion.
it would be A FAAAAAR CALL to expect our current toddlee A.I. to do zilch in catching a whiff **before** a crime occured.
i mean.. really.
what if i am acting almost alone or in a limited way getting instructions over a securef communication and collecting arson or weapons or explisives wirhin closed premises.
aka no public meetings or significant appearance out of the ordinary.. in front of surveilance cameras.
i could be wrong but just my two paise
I would think the problem for Germany (and England and the U.S.) is more that the federal police agencies are run by politically correct cucks who wont WANT to keep tabs on jihadists, because "racism!".
Chuck Fina You have no idea what happens in the US in the name of law and order, do you?
I like how hes adapted to not having a live audience by removing the awkward pause between jokes
It’s important to remember who this technology isn’t being used on. None of these cameras are in corporate boardrooms, police precincts, Klan rallies, or offices of government
Cody and William Murphy a distinctly different thing, my dude!
i wanted to retweet this
Narvin Meherun just post it on Twitter and give him credit lol
Cody and William Murphy sounds like a middle aged white woman’s baby shower lol 😂
the police even covered their badge numbers at protests
"It's like Skynet but not evil."
- Skynet
Yeah, I'm convinced.
Oh no the tech company named its product after a bad thing from science fiction, I type sarcastically in-between drinks of soylent.
Original skynet claimed the same thing.
Original skynet claimed the same thing.
😂😂😂
1984 has now been moved to the "I TOLD YOU SO!" section of every bookstore.
15 years too late.
@@Megalomaniakaal - You skipped math classes, didn't you?
Along with the movie Idiocracy.
Kidlike101 - The sad part is the government didn't force it down our throats. We did more than willingly.
Honestly, when I first read "1984", it was right after I returned home from a summer trip over the pond (in Europe), about 2 weeks after 9/11 happened. As I read it, inevitably I would read something that wouldn't fly in the past, but would now, and I'd say in my head, "Yep, I can see that happening here". I've read it and reread it over and over through the years, and those "Yeps" are definitely getting more frequent.
The fact that Google removed their facial search engine from public access kinda said something. I remember using it back then, it just creeped me out having that kind of... power.
That was a thing? Jesus.
"Burn it all down."
That's this year's theme.
Tea.
Yeah, just wait till next year
But I don’t like fire. It is central to some of the most traumatic events in my life. There are other options and honestly the firemen in Fahrenheit 451 are seeming less and less fiction and more like prediction.
I've been screaming that since Reagan! And, it seems, people are finally waking up.... But for how long? The rich own everything and will lull the masses back asleep. I predict, by mid August, all this will be a talking point, used by Republicans against everyone they do not agree. And, Trump will be reelected. Just watch! The stupidity of the voting masses is astounding. I'm so grateful my life is coming to an end. Openly proud fascists' roaming the streets of America, with a smirk on their faces, because they own the press. That happened in 1982, and we are living the result. America is over. It ended in 1982.
Pretty much
"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face- forever. ”
― George Orwell, 1984
That quote comes to my mind pretty often these days.
Forewer =/= For a quite some time
This is REALLY nitpicky, but why on Earth did you go from using an en dash to an em dash? It should be an em dash for both. Like, that was more work to do to be wrong.
@@vituperation not when i cut and paste from the site its from.
Tear it down, the whole fuckin thing
I appreciate that he’s learned to do this without an audience, because this is so much less awkward than the first few episodes in quarantine
It wasnt awkward bc there was no audience, it was awkward bc they were all super serious and sad bc they were all corona themed.
@@Pomagranite167 No, the timing of jokes and pauses have been changed and this flows a lot faster than when there was a live audience.
right!? yeah it was weird for a bit but he's ridden the wave of silence and got a good beat on timing too
@@Pomagranite167 mm yeah ok i'll give you that, though having an audience is something a comedian get's used to and why most standups can't do a web thing, no feedback. look at bill maher's show (if you dare), he hasn't adapted as well. lol.
As much as I enjoy hearing the laughter at a particularly well-done joke, part of me hopes he stays without one whenever all this dies down. He's started to rely a lot less on annoying, "goes-on-too-long-repeat-the-same-word-over-and-over" gags just to get the audience hooting and it's fantastic.
Pro tip for anyone interested: cover one eye
most facial recognition algos can't identify a face unless both eyes are visible and will otherwise dismiss the image as not a face
the best solution is to use a sticker, preferably cartoonish as the line art will confuse the algorithm
so people who lost an eye will have more of a chance of being misidentified?
@@funkuro Not necessarily, the bone structure around the eye is key data by cover one eye I mean you should also cover the brow and a bit below the eye.
an easy way to tell whether you're Identifiable by common facial recognition programs or not can be done with snapchat
bring it up, and add any gooofy filter that alters your face. If your cover up is successful, the filter won't work
Maybe a big old eyepatch situation. People are less likely to hassle someone if they look disabled, than if you were just wearing a mask. Although, if this is the case, wouldn't FR systems be unable to match someone's face from the side?
or paint another set of eyes misaligned with real ones, that should reaaally mess up with algorithm
@@whosplayingyou29 are you in vfx?
Ed Snowden is just sitting there in the dark, in his room in Moscow, going: "yep. smh. Told you so."
My first thought!
More likely thinking. You idiots dont Care for Even that!
yeah because noone else ever knew AI existed right ... not everyone is empty in the head, like you...
normal people just mind their own business and don't whine and have a tantrum like children over things they have no control over ...
Microphunktv You must be one of Those who lets the goverment do and decide everything about their life. I would have started using that brain god gave you without being so angry at others Just because they have an free Will to think for them self. And yeah its okey to have different thoughts. And the issue is not that none know. But nobody Cares, because of the fact Wich you talk about. All go around and think they have to Just live your life and all is Good. Just keep puting your head under the sand
@@Microphunktv-jb3kj AI doesn't exist. Modules required for eventually creating an actual AI do exist or in the works, but AI right now is not actual AI, it's just a word used to sell it as the guys with the money won't check that deep, neither will normal users, as many think Alexa or Siri are AI's
"It's Skynet but good?"
But Skynet was supposed to be good too. It turned bad.
That's like making a virtual reality machine that creates hyper realistic virtual world's based on your dreams, but the virtual tour guide is Freddie Kruger. And your tag line is, "It's like Nightmare on Elm Street. But good."
Freddie Kruger shouldn't be anywhere near my fucking dreams.
I read this in John's voice 😂
Correct. He belongs in your nightmares.
This analogy works extremely well, since the total power Freddie holds over his victims by controlling the dreamworld they are getting butchered in equals a world with such totalitarian surveillance technology. It's a terrifying and horrific nightmare with no place to hide.
One of my favorite lines from the old version of despair.com “people tell you to dream but forget to mention that nightmares are dreams too.”
They think they can beat the odds
"1984" was meant to be nothing more than a dystopian cautionary tale, NOT the blueprint for a panoptical police-state.
Yes but who is responsible?
Or was it ?????
What if it was a warning to mankind...
@@moinkallo689 It WAS meant to be a warning-hence the "cautionary tale" inclusion in my post.
Are you sure about that? 😂
As a home nurse I realized most patients with fall risk rather risk falling than have someone sitting at their bedside watching them sleep, sometimes the insist on setting up a camera and having you watch from the next room. no amount of security worth your freedom, that's why we move out of our parents home.
Someone watching you sleep is just plain creepy tho. Regardless of the intention.
The second that Russian guy suggested taking a pic of a random woman i started screaming in panic. Noooooooo!
And it's not even that implausible that you could spend like 5 minutes and get their name, address, contact information, etc.
@@Shifterwizard Only if they've decided to put that information on the internet.
@@Shifterwizard considering how people can be dangerous and outright follow someone they decide theyre interested in is HORRIFYING. i once had a guy FOLLOW ME TO MY CAR to ask me out and i was absolutely terrified! Imagine if a creeper could essentially doxx someone to stalk them!
@@youknowwho9247 what do you mean? Basically everyone is on the internet... most of the people have now mobile phone, and their mobile operator usually has their full ID data (and they are signed for many other commercial services with their real ID)... not saying it's simple to get into that without warrant, but with unlucky combination of state+operator+black_hat_hacker it may be like only $50 away for ANYONE, especially if you are sitting within the 5-10m of them capable to scan through their devices or eavesdrop on the same WiFi network, etc... It's not like this is issue only if you have Facebook account. That just makes it easier and smoother, but don't feel protected by skipping social networks. You are probably raising the difficulty, but not that much.
@@ped7g It doesn't even require a hacker or any sort of sophistication. A surprising amount of data is in the public record. Whitepages and other search engines can get me anyone's home address (or at least narrow down the possibilities to a small handful of addresses) with ease in just a few minutes. For free too.
1950s : we're gonna have flying cars
2020 : Ai is racist
some things never change...
Bruh 😂😂😂
Haha! 😂 Deja Poo... haha!! Great stuff!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
People that build AI are racist, AI is not
John Oliver is the only talk show host that is making it work with no studio audience. He’s still as funny and informative as ever. Thank you John. You’re the bees knees
John Oliver has a completely different format from the other shows. It's a one-topic retrospective of things that happened a while back. Which allows for more research and a more complete look on the situation. This sets LWT apart from the daily shows - studio or not.
And don't get me wrong, I really like the John Oliver show for this bit of more distance to the actual events.
But for experiencing the actual situation the other shows, be it Trevor Noah, Stephen Colbert, Seth Meyers, Jimmy Kimmel and funny enough Bill Maher recently are also quite good.
Trevor Noah has adapted well too.
May also be worth mentioning Cody Johnston, but he's not actually a talk show host in the same sense. He has been doing youtube style single-topic news videos all along, kind of like John Oliver but more disheveled and snarky.
Lmao throwback to when Winger asked Duncan, "How is it you and James Bond come from the same island?"
Everyone: "Oh no, this is ba-"
John Oliver: "But wait, it gets worse"
The sad thing is that it is actually much, MUCH worse. This episode barely scratches the surface of the problem. I'm actually surprised at the things they DIDN'T include.
I'm not going to copy/paste the Wall of Text from my other post. But I will link to it.
ua-cam.com/video/jZjmlJPJgug/v-deo.html&lc=z23fcxhhnnbwc5uoh04t1aokgekrmuhpwi5b0fc1dijnbk0h00410
EDIT: UA-cam doesn't let you link directly to a comment anymore. That link is for this video, but the comment at the very top will be the 'Highlighted Comment".
EDIT AGAIN: You have to copy & paste it because UA-cam will strip off the latter half of the link if you just click it...
Overwatch that link brings me back to the video you just commented on 🤔
@@epapa217 Yes but the comment should be at the very top of the comments as the "highlighted comment"
BUT WAIT, THERE'S MORE!
That about sums up almost every episode of "Last Week Tonight" ever.
"Hi guys! Today's tutorial is on how to hide from cameras."
Is this what being in a dystopia is like? I think we're in a dystopia.
Terrible Russian accent!
hi kathy, i agree, tho i wonder how many out there know the meaning of dystopia...?
@@shaukahodan2373 I thought it was passable, but then again I'm not Russian or Eastern European.
And you ARE RIGHT
Just wear a mask
"In China, 'Skynet' is good."
"Yes, that's a difference."
An exchange that's both hilarious and terrifying.
my cousin was an founder of facial recognization company in China.. these discussion changed my view about this techonology
It becomes more terrifying the more you think about it. In no way did the fictional Skynet ever think it was evil, it did what it did because it was deemed necessary. So when someone says their AI is good and not evil, they need to specify exactly why it is good and what prevents it from ever trying to nuke us all
@@JachAnen "The road to Hell is paved with good intentions" is the apt aphorism for this LWT segment.
@@nnannakalu9423 so road to heaven is paved with bad intentions?
reminds me of America’s government for the past 4 years
"White guy? No problem." - The unofficial motto of history.
"Burn it all down" literally my reaction to that scenario. How did no one see how creepy and disturbing that whole thing is. Taking a picture of a random person then having access to their whole life?? WTAF??
Snowden already told you how many years ago.
This is the product of leftism and putting government authority on a pedestal. We need to start focusing on decentralisation.
Hello I am a boomer. Having lived a lifetime with complete anonymity and the only comparable thing being photographs, I have no idea what the problem is. Also, I don’t own a computer and I’m in charge of making laws about stuff like this.
@@Medhead101 I think you mean liberalism. Not leftism. It's liberals that believe in the apparatus to ensure fairness and create progress. Leftists want to dismantle hierarchies, including the state, though some of us disagree about the means, and some think that seizing control of the state is a necessary step in the process of dismantling it and the coercive power of capital.
--A random anarchist on the internet.
Medhead101 What? This has nothing to do with governments.
A company made an app.
Person talking about the global apocalypse : "in hindsight, they named it skynet, we probably should have seen this coming"
Spot on!
Interesting how fictional movies/stories from our past, that depicted dystopian futures that have not happened, have seemed to provide the language/infrastructure for that very future to become manifest. We've got Skynet and... Soylent already.
@@shiningdawn8578 soylent? I'm sorry where do we have that
@@shiningdawn8578 on a side note we call it predicted programming and you call us crazy
soylent.com
It’s not people...for now
It would be a shame if a hundred million people all simultaneously sued ClearWater AI for violating the copyright of photographs,
Technically the one who took the photo owns the copyright but only for media and advertising purposes. Once shared on social media it is consent to reshare and there is no provision in the law which states anything about using shared media to build databases.
My wife has been a portrait photographer since 2015 and we had to get very familiar with the laws when we had a legal agreement drafted for our customers to sign after someone used a photo for a local ad... Which would have been okay if they had not cropped the photo to cut off the top of someone's head, which created bad branding for us.
It is a case of, "there's nothing in the rulebook that says a golden retriever can't play basketball."
@@dorienrose9982 Those laws are quite different depending on the countries
@@dorienrose9982 Not the point the point is everyine suing at once, means they still have to sort through a million slap suits
@@andremilanimartin3338 Those laws are all the same internationally among countries that signed WIPO
Clearview*
To be honest, the difference between Baroque and Rococo architecture is chiefly the fact that while Baroque designs have intricate and detailed decorative molding incorporated into interior design, Rococo amplifies that by heaping the molding further and further until it looks like mounds of frosting. Rococo is everything good about Baroque, but EXTRA.
thanks, i was wondering.
so now i know: rococo is like baroque but even more overdone ^^ also i think i now have a least favorite architectural style! yay!
John is now sooooooooo used to not holding for audience laughter, he is talking faster and faster😂
I've been noticing that each week he speeds up
@@Vercingetorix.Fantasia "I finally did it! I got rid of the audience! At last I can make the show I always wanted to, which is just me ranting away in the most eloquent, witty and well researched way I can think of!"
Get 1.15x more Oliver and for my money I'll take it
@@BiffChunksteak Nah John loved the audience and you could tell he was taken aback by not having one the first few weeks. He's a comedian at heart and comedians feed off of the feedback they get from the audience whether a joke has landed or not. I mean I'm sure he is enjoying not having to care whether the jokes land or not but I guarantee you he can't wait to get back to the set.
Last week tonight but every time that John Oliver gets more stressed out it gets faster
This show is 10 times more serious without the audience
Strict improvement, a lot of his jokes were bad and forced
Yeah his jokes were always the worst part of his show and the audience made it even worse
@@RadMan224 they had the occasional quality joke. His televangelist rpisode ending was fantastic
The 'it's the same salmon' bit would definitely have got a good reaction in the studio.
Better for it
"Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should." -Dr. Ian Malcolm
YES!! THIS RIGHT FUCKIN HERE!!👆👆👆
@@Calvan42 that guy is not a scientist. He probably just took an off the shelf image classification algorithm and scraped enough data of the internet to train it. Arguably, not even the people that developed those algorithms were scientists, depending on the question whether or not maths/computer science is actually a science (Since you are not really observing an modelling natural phenomena there).
KEine Ahnung the person completed the job without asking the purpose of the task. Regardless how they got the source or algorithm, the tool is now completed. The context is how is the tool being used?
Somebresome
Ian Malcolm was a shitty character.
Jurassic Park was *not* a shitty movie.
@Somebresome That is a mega-false statement.
For some reason turning on John Oliver when I wake up in the middle the night always helps me sleep. His voice is so soothing ❤️
It's a good thing his voice is because the subjects he brings to our attention definitely aren't. Through no fault of his, of course, it's the world that's distressing, but it's still nice that he at least offsets it a bit with his manner.
Cop: "We need this to catch terrorists"
Same Cop: "I need to search for this guy who disagreed with me"
Hell, there have already been cases where cops have used police databases to track, harass, stalk, and, at least once that I know of, kill exes. You wanna lay money on the idea that they're not creaming their pants at the thought of shit like this?
Law enforcement will be foiled by their own tech: Bad mustaches.
I got a pack of them for $3.99. And maybe add some googly eyes.
Or....Same Cop: I need to find the BLM protester that gave me and my partner a dirty look to teach him a lesson 😬
In the mind of that cop, "terrorist", "guy who disagreed with me", and "BLM protester" are the same thing because there are people whose worldview is limited to good guy/bad guy. We have projected the simplified morals from the cartoons and movies we consumed in our youth onto how policing happens in the modern world.
@@roguishpaladin add the idea that antifa is now considered a terrorist organization, now they can do "any angry blm protester"->"antifa"->"terrorist"
Everyone in 2019: "Skynet" is coming, but it'll surely have some other name.
In 2020: Oh. Nope, same name, too.
Certain points in time cannot be altered.
Legion?
Maybe face masks as a regular fashion isn’t such a terrible idea
They're terribly comfortable and I expect everyone will be wearing them in the future.
Facial recognition is easily tweaked to work with only the upper half of the face, I'm afraid.
If anything, it might exacerbate the misidentification issue.
Last time read up about it, it was more about the length between the ridge of the nose to your eyes that where the most important thing to scan.
Sean Hembree nice princess bride reference!
Mask, sunglasses, and your favorite hat!
Facebook message a girl. "Hello. You don't know me. I'm watching you right now. I like your pretty dress." Works everytime.
Every girl I know would roll her eyes. Stalkers are cowards
@@lazyhomebody1356 i suspect you missed the sarcasm.
@@sjs9698 Eh, he thought his joke was funny. I know it was a joke, but it isn't funny
Can we take a moment to appreciate how good John Oliver's Photoshop artists are
That ‘Netflix’ show got me for a moment
The best photoshop I’ve seen so far
Idk if you’ve ever actually used PS but this content is garbage... try commenting something intelligent 🧐
Yes! They have an excellent graphics department
Fox news Photoshop artist gotta step up their game 😂😂😂
Black mirror really said “you gonna experience season 6.”
Charlie Brooker's not going to be able to write anything terrifying now. Compared to real life, the show's about to be a really dry documentary.
Yeah I think black mirror just became a reality show this year
TOO real lol
There’s just way too many things to worry about at this point
That's the point
I think there always has been. The internet has just given us better access to information.
There’s always been shit to worry about, we’re just seeing it more. A blessing and a curse for growing up with social media.
Yet so many of these worries and problems intersect in matters of elementary moral principles, basic human decency, freedom: values that we share. There's time yet to take action in solidarity with each other.
no there isn't we cannot sacrifice our freedom like that. our privacy, pleasee the left has to stop this!
"This Brown University Student"
I had another window blocking the name of the university and I was like "Did he just call her brown?"
The Clearview guy is just giving off WAVES of bad vibes.
You'd think he could be sued over it...
My read on that cat is not bad vibes. Its an internet bro in his 20s that thinks he is doing a good thing and proud of himself, perhaps a bit too proud. Just as SkyNet was supposed to eliminate a worm from cyberspace in T3. He legit thinks he is doing a good thing and helping with the most heinous crimes. He also seems easily corruptible, but not corrupt yet. He isnt just going to up and admit his brainchild company is not what most folks want and stop scraping.
@@RaulDukeKnife -- he looks AND sounds evil. Which granted, could easily be wrong. But what he's doing is clearly evil, so there you go.
His permanent smirk reminds me of Shkreli. It almost says, "There's nothing embarrassing about me anywhere on the internet, but I know what you did during THAT spring break."
Was he the inspiration for the portrayal of Lex Luthor in the recent DC movies?
This brings up the age-old “I have nothing to hide” argument. People always use that as an argument to say they’re ok with this type of surveillance. I’m willing to bet, though, that if I randomly walked up to any of those people on the street - let’s say we’re both in line at the same deli - and asked them for their license plate number and home address, they’d be inclined to say no. Both of those things are “public information” but it’s still an invasion of privacy. People rely on security by obscurity and facial recognition technology completely destroys any type of privacy we have left.
As much as I try to love humanity, most people are idiots. Lol, it is simply the way it is. One day, they will all understand. It is a matter of personal development/intellectual advancement. I'm no Saint and I'm no genius, but at least I can take pride in my ability to be aware of my the environment and current state of things.
People who are okay with this are going to be in an extreme minority. Only people with a lot of power and can gain a lot will turn a blind eye, sadly ofc those are the people who get to decide.
An even better experiment would be to stay exactly 15-20 feet away from them and film them while they move around a public space. Not an invasion of privacy, but everyone recognizes there's something abusive about it.
Trying to proactively identify _everyone_ walking around in public, with no reasonable suspicion that any specific one of those people has committed a specific crime, is problematic. "Privacy" isn't quite the right word, and we still lack much of the vocabulary we need to talk about it effectively. I think it's closer to, how our understanding of "presumption of innocence" needs to be adjusted to account for the information age.
@@CaptainWumbo you're being naive. It's going to widely accepted, because people will use the excuse "it's to protect you from terrorists/murderers/pedophiles! Only criminals have anything to worry about!"
And people will criticize anyone who speaks out about it.
And even more terrifying, this technology will allow governments to target people _who criticize the system"
People are idiots. They'll protest and complain about getting their hair cut in the middle of a pandemic, you think they'll see the bigger picture on this?
It's a stupid argument primarily because it assumes that laws will always be reasonable, respectful of privacy and that the rule of law in a democratic state will always be the status of your country. The US is and has many times been on the brink of being a totalitarian state. And the first many steps along that way are not sudden but a sliding scale. Therefore there may be a time when you find yourself in trouble though you had nothing to hide when it's too late for you to do anything about these invasive systems.
"You're under arrest because our facial recognition system identified you as looking like Woody Harrelson."
...
You can't make this shit up
There was a William Gibson novel years ago, with an app called Separated at Birth... instead of using photofits or even photographs, it identified which famous person a subject resembled, then said "look for a person who looks like ."
It's actually more accurate than that, they use AI which learns how to tell the difference between each picture and creates a type of hash which is like a tag for each piece of data, then it gets put into a big database which is searchable. www.infrrd.ai/blog/can-deep-learning-and-ai-help-in-preprocessing-images-for-ocr
I feel like if facial recognition is made more common it could also be used by employers to identify and further discriminate against those with criminal records.
Lost it at the company that was unironically named "Skynet"
Citizens of China can now rebel against Winnie the Pooh and *SKYNET*
Even the name is not original.
(movie) skynet was supposed to be good at first too.
yeah, exactly my idea x.X
wtf...
Yeah I saw the SKYNET sign and my first thought was "Holy shit they REALLY need to get someone to check if their product name is going to be a prob..."
" 'The Terminator' is the favorite film of our founder."
Oh. Wow. OK then.
Every year John warns us about something that will inevitably happen.
He's like a soothsayer from a Greek tragedy, at this rate.
@@domingadoflaminga3961 *oracle
He’s really John Conner, from an alternative timeline.
@Neronian Diamanti yeah, no doubt the NSA is using in some form now
Finally someone point it out!
Trump,Bojo,Kavanaugh,Modi,
except for one time,Marine Le Pen.
Imagine how difficult it would be for a minor trying to escape a domestic abuse situation at home by running away...
Or abused spouse.
@@ekdaufin1485 this technology is not what is or will deter abused spouses to run away. Most fear running away because they depend on their abuser psychologically or the abuser physically threatens harm if they do. If they actually mentally and physically could muster up to run away, they can seek help such as getting a restraining order. In turn, this technology could actually help enforce that restraining order.
@@PR2k9 Considering that 40% of cops ADMITTED to being abusers (and the number is probably much higher), its also very worrying. They could use their position to their advantage, just like they've been doing for years.
@@PR2k9 Additionally, a high number of women that _do_ leave wind up dead, because their ex stalks them & murders them. This kind of technology would only make them easier to find.
Plus, a high number of cops are domestic abusers. They already kill with impunity, imagine thinking of leaving your violent husband when you know he has access to this kind of tech?? You'd understand you were leaving to wind up dead later.
Facial recognition software is bad on every level. It makes it ridiculously easy for the government to round up & cage all dissidents. You want a dystopia? You want an authoritarian nightmare. This is how you get it.
Trump already has a hard on for labeling those against fascism as "terrorists". And alt right/neo nazi/white supremacists have already been seen at protests, attacking nonviolent protests, running them over, one bastard shot at them with arrows. How much easier will it be to bring back lynching & KKK style mob killings of people against fascism, of immigrants, of people of color?
This shit is _terrifying._ And if you think you wouldn't be affected, you're wrong.
@@shadypalmtree2989 I dont see how a cop or anyone can make use of it if their victim does not leave. This technology only helps abusers IF the victim leaves. The fact that most victims dont run away is the biggest hurdle for victims, not that they can be tracked.
Why does John Oliver always seem to be on the, "right side of the law," yet never gets threatened by like Oil companies. Kudos to the dude, he got some balls, and will be America's First KING!
17:33 that lip twitch of pure anger and evil when he gets interrupted.
This man is clearly a psychopath.
Wow. Can't unsee it!
Psychopath is a little bit far fetched, but he's certainly suspect!
Future Bond villain in the making
Wtf.... Psychopath
@@The8BitPianist He is. All signs are there.
You know someone’s a bad guy if they make UA-cam, Twitter, and Facebook look like the good guys...
haha... oh u mean youtube, the platform that you're currently using to stay informed, entertained, and on which you've typed that comment? yes, pure evil! :P
Your profile picture is a notoriously mean human you have no say in any of this
@@mogur00 do you drive a car that puts out emissions into the atmosphere? You're pretty evil smh.
Nathaniel Thrush, you mean sites collecting data that's a million times easier to misuse than just faces?
@@mogur00 My left-anarchist roomate uses Tik Tok (which is infamous for working from the Chinese Government) and gets delivery from Amazon Prime(Amazon funds the ICE camps) because of the global outbreak making it unsafe to go outside. Don't pretend like it's a simple matter of people not using services that don't align with their political views. Personally I actively criticize UA-cam on their Creator Insider channel because it's the closest we have to a proper communication line (even if said communication line is often prone to lying to us, as I've proved in a playlist of mine).
"I want to be a responsible one" proceed too ignore three cease and desist order. 10/10
Even though it feels like we're inching slowly towards a nightmarish dystopia everyday, its also pretty cool that we're basically living in a sci-fi movie from the 80s or 90s that's about the dangers of technology. I'm just waiting to hear about how an island park featuring clone dinosaurs just opened up.
The reality is much more prosaic. You're denied a home loan because of a dank meme you posted about the government or because of your skin color, and your children grow up under the same treatment, so your family remains in an underclass no matter how hard you work. Everyone like you slaves away indefinitely to the benefit of some ruling class that emerges. Lawful protest is met with vicious and insidious retribution. Maybe things change in a couple hundred years, maybe they don't.
Bro, a legit chill went down my spine when the dude in the cafe took a pic of that chick and found her social media page. Holy shit dude.
Jesus loves you very much!!!
Yeah!! Not good ..not good at all
That is why you shouldn't have social media!!!!
@@GHustle4 At last not where "all things you upload belong to us from that point on" is literally in ToS - but who reads ToS anyways....
It was staged because it was an advertisement, but being able to do that at all is a creeper/stalker's dream.
"terminator is the favorite film of our founder" is probably not what you want out of a company that works with technology
I just rewatched the trilogy a couple weeks ago. Many things they imagined are real now. It’s amazing :)
@@4philipp found the founder of skynet
@@4philipp okay on one hand yes, it's a marvel of modern technology, but the rest of the movies parts would not be ideal lol
@@kamilareeder1493 We named our batteries "the Matrix" as the Matrix is the favorite film of our founder. Don't ask what's in them, please.
@Juni Post yes, but we can't even get some humans to understand how other humans feel!
"I know where you live, your car, your family..."
"Mafia?"
"No, government."
Yeah stalkers and ex boyfriends will love this
"So taxpayer funded Mafia."
They already know that...
no, facebook user
Hey, what's the difference?
Never thought I would ever be wearing a mask into a bank. Pretty sweet.
"Your scientists were too occupied thinking about if they 'could' that they never considered wether they 'should'!"
@Albert Whisker Dude that quote never singled out scientists, it was directed to Hammond who funded the project. A project that was lead by not evil scientists but enthusiastic ones.
Progress will progress. We just need to learn to use whatever we discover and learn to do. No stopping that.
By banning research in this areas we will make sure China will have better AI tech and USA will lag behind.
"Condors. If our program was about matching endangered condors to date each other, you wouldn't have any problem with it."
worst than that everyone else was like yea we shouldnt so this guy was like ok well i will just take the same tech. and apply it with no moral or ethical concern to make money
That’s why we were raised Roman Catholic during the Space Race, not the Arms Race. Ethics and Science. Our records were not digitized by then, so we didn’t know they were building on our colonial tobacco fields until after Korean War. Most of Dad’s class out of San D didn’t make it to Korea. Dad and another guy went to Guam bc they were Black in 1948 when they opened professional jobs in the military when 1984 was written. Before that, we were already educated and had judges, sheriffs and medics and doctors in the Navy.
People called Dad “Chief” bc he was also a Boy Scout master. He was a data systems analyst and I was a Network systems analyst, regardless of my title in a UNIX call center
They both came back
Didn’t someone write a book about this? I wouldn’t know.... I was born in 1985.
They made a movie. Babe in the big city
This gave me a good sad laugh. Thanks bud.
1984 is the book but I here you this is Orwellian
Ha
Yeah. The book is called brave new world
Wasn't expecting to get even more upset with the world right now, but John truly delivered!
@Floating Sunfish ..every single time😔😔
@Just Adab Go read the usa patriot act or read up on edward snowden.
this is just the tip of a giant 100% shit iceberg
Why? you uploaeded those photos.
www.cnet.com/news/clearview-ai-had-entire-client-list-stolen-in-data-breach/ here, let me add this on top.
Oh and figure that the sudden jump in efficiency in China's recognition, might be from a previous hack in that bitchHon tried to downplay, where software was taken. So, you know, if you're wondering why Hong Kong's people are sometimes snatched and so forth, it's because of this.
Sociopaths left unchecked lead to HonBitch's situation. He is a sociopath.
That line about British people coming in two variations was, I must say, hilarious.
How to be entertained and terrified at the same time: John Oliver.
weirdly enough, the same description also fits black mirror.
I guess face coverings will now be normal even after the pandemic.
Meh, that can work.
@@joshuabanner9920 shoplifting had never been easier
Except nobody even wears them now while we're still in one.
Easier solution. Reflective makeup. Doesn't have to be like that one lady he showed. You can have skin tone paint that is laced with reflective bits.
Just need enough to blind the cams, so maybe some eye liner.
Hell, I don't plan on ever stopping to cover my face in public again. It feels so much better.
We're SOOOOO close to living an actual Black Mirror episode.
Already there.
Been since the 90s
Too late
We're already there.
Obligatory we're in one since 2010 at least remark.
we've been IN IT for a MINUTE
As a child of the 80s and early 90s I will never ever trust any company named, "Skynet."
"A matter of internal security - the age old cry of the oppressor." - Jean-Luc Picard
That didn't end well for Picard (he was Miserable).
Mark Foster lol according to cynical sjw propaganda rooted in intersectional feminist garbage. We aren’t counting that as canon. Its an insult to fans everywhere and universally reviled by the fans of the original show.
@@azurebadger you okay there buddy?
This type of shit happens everyday
@@cflynn8091 You could have simply admitted that you have no idea what I am talking about instead
"This show has always been anti-atrocity"
That haircut says otherwise.
burn david
The savagery is both off the charts and appropriate. Well done!
Shots fired.
I love when I scroll through the comments and see the comment I planned to write, only better.
Well played.
I was racking my brain for comeback as soon as the words came out of his mouth, but I got nuthin'...
We should really listen to our tech friends. 12 years ago my friend told me she would NEVER upload a photo of herself online. She hated Facebook n stated it will be use to track you very soon. She was right.
13 years ago when I was 12 my friends all had FB but I didn't. One day a video was taken with all of us in it and they said my first name, and I got paranoid about it and asked them not to post it, but they brushed it off. I quickly fell in line with everyone else, making social media a part of my everyday life, and every day I feel like my 12 year old self was probably right.
It's not hard for me to imagine how creepy this would be for any lady, as I had something like this happen to me. I was at a convention, meet a couple of people who were running an anime booth. Before I had even walked 10 feet away from chatting with them briefly, one of them found and tried to friend me on Google Plus. Like who even used Google Plus, much less actually be able to find someone on there!
This is why we need to compile an independent photo-database of police officers. Turnabout is fair play.
Steve Rogers: "we compromised. Sometimes in ways that made us not sleep so well. But we did it so the people could be free. This isn’t freedom, this is fear."
Like the HST book Kingdom of Fear
We wanted our country to be captain America, but instead it is Iron Man.
geek
Natibe_ Tony’s the superior hero, so
@@DefenestrateYourself but not the superior man.
What I always love about John’s show is sometimes I’ll start off listening and thinking “okay, mildly concerning but not alarming” and then you listen more and there is always this thought somewhere in the middle like “oh wait....no, but that means....”
Then by the end youre thinking “oh no...oh this is really bad...” and he is always there with “But wait! There’s more!”
... and finished off with John's cheerful parting words: "That's our show! Good night!"
i can’t trust a company that forces me to give out my photos without consent, especially when i live outside the unites states and that company doesn’t comply with GDPR laws.
Remember the ubiquitous eyescans in the movie “Minority Report,” and how everyone thought they were so creepy and intrusive? How did we let it come to this?
What's the answer to 99 out of 100 questions? "Money."
Money and also probably a mayority of people didn't even know this was a thing that was happening...
Theomite Yes, money, money, money
Well, the answer is a bit long and complicated, but the short version is that people who grew up without it died off and people who grew up with it find it normal. This is how all technological and societal changes happen.
@@Juliett-A Your comment reminds me on Animal Farm,.... it's so depressing.
Belgium outright banned facial recognition surveillance for the private sector and are heavily restricting it for law enforcement use too.
The EU itself is also moving that way.
Not surprising - the EU has always been less about buisness and more about the people. Unlike the US... Too much freedom can be a bit much to base a society about.
So the US is a s**thole country?
Actually, 2 months ago they came up with a White Paper on AI and facial recognition, and they abandoned their previous intentions of banning FR in the public space. Instead they said that they won't stop progress with extra regulations, so they will not change anything within the GDPR for now.
Europe has a very recent historical experience with oppressive government. Hint: German occupation, WWII
"skynet but good" sounds like a company slogan from a satirical tv show
It doesn't kill all humans, just the ones from foreign countries.
My ISP is named Skynet. They have fantastic service and a good sense of humor.
Skynet started out as a good thing in Terminator as well. It's not like it was designed to be evil. That guy could not have sounded more dumb
@@goldengryphon Lots of [brand]s these days have PR people with good senses of humor. You should have seen when the Sonic Twitter tweeted the Bubsy twitter, even the Mega Man twitter got in on it.
jesus we can't sacrifice our privacy our freedom like that. please don't let technocracy take over the world,
"Hormonal Stalingrad" I'm fucking dead LMFAO
This show has a whole new impact with no audience. Sometimes the laughter would undermine the points. Watching past episodes is so different.
I was thinking the same thing. At first, I found the lack of an audience kind of strange, but as the weeks have gone on, I like it. You've right about he laughter sometimes lessening the impact of the statement. It'll be interesting to see if there are any changes to the format going forward, once things are back to "normal".
Same, the rapid fire helps, listening to old ones with the laughs feels jarring now. Oh there is a podcast about how we eliminated the laugh track in most Sitcoms - 99percentinvisible.org/episode/the-laff-box/
John is one of the of its kind who is still funny without the audience informing you he just made a joke
Yeah it is better now
Tbh I've never found him funny, and I still don't, but he's still informative.
Edward Snowden said in his interview with Oliver we shouldn't change the way we behave to compensate for all the data getting collected from us.....
But I sure want to delete my Twitter Account now.
So we should not do the equivalent of Posting billboards with our faces on it to stop people from seeing it, but rather we should keep doing it and not expect people to see it? K....
Facebook and related apps are way worst
Edward Snowden didn't really change anything, he made it easier for the government to collect information.
I have a Twitter but I don't have IG or FB. I also make sure my Google stuff is always deactivated, like tracking and voice commands. I never have used facial or fingerprint recognition as a sign in method. Maybe it's a false sense of some security, but right now that's all I've got. Plus I also use a VPN.
@@kappadarwin9476 Well, while he certainly did help develope it, he also informed the public that this was being developed, and used. The only reason the gov is not putting a stop to this is because so much more shit has happened that the means to finding the truth isn't really a question right now, not when the value of truth itself is under attack. Also, ppl seem to have missed the point when Snowden revealed the spying.
"Looks like a mime went through a shredder"
Should've gone with "Looks like somebody I used to know"
Looks like a face version of cubism / the dazzle camouflage.
I was thinking "Looks like a Picasso", so many ways to joke about that one.
@@quentinlefebvre7881 that's the one I thought of, but the Gotye reference made me laugh harder
perfection
Like the music video for that one song. I get the reference.
Did you ever see the Star Wars parody?
I used to live in Ontario, Oregon; the police there tried out facial recognition cameras in several city parks, and as it turns out, they’re not very good. The cameras couldn’t tell the difference between a blueberry muffin and a Chihuahua.
"Hormonal Stalingrad" - that's poetry.
Absolutely
AI researcher here:
I started doing deep learning because it's an incredibly powerful tool (I use it for medical work), but it is big time bad news if used without the betterment of humanity as your goal (clearly).
We NEED regulation. With tools like tensor flow/keras, pytorch, etc. It is *way* too easy to build networks like this. Not that we are at any kind of a loss for things to write your congresspeople these days, but holy shit.
John did a reasonable job showing what the current state of the art can do, but we're just scratching the surface of what this tech is capable of. However scared you are now, it's not nearly as scared as you should be.
I mean, I think AI is also giving us twitter.com/normalcatpics?s=09 so the old laws and gods may not be enough.
@@AndromedaD yeah the nets behind those image generators are the same ones that gave us deepfakes. Generative Adversarial Nets use two paired networks (generator/discriminator) for training. Instead of just feeding the discriminator net labelled data, you also feed it generated data and try to get it to tell the difference. At the same time the generator is trained to make convincing fakes. They're a bitch-and-a-half to train, but a good generator can do some crazy shit.
Some have been trained on human images and made some eerily realistic fake people. Look up "this person does not exist" if you wanna feel a little unsettled
Tech is not scary, it’s how it’s used is scary. The tech getting better is good, it’s the people using it getting worse is the concern.
Also the fact that it'll work better/different on certain data than others if the training data is skewed.
@@OurayTheOwl Even taking people out of the equation though, tech can still be done to do bad things. AI is totally capable of errors and always will be, just like people are. Just different kinds of errors.
It’s like the beginning of a sci-fi futuristic dystopia movie, but in the real world, and we can clearly see where it is leading. What’s worse, we don’t do anything to stop it
There isn't much we can do about it, unfortunately...we're too far gone.
Hell, one of those AI’s is even called Skynet!
I mean, what *can* you do? With the 2 party system in the US, it's difficult (if not impossible) to get any political representation for the interests of the people over the interests of corporations and the state.
Every politician in my area would be happier helping Clearview make a boatload of money along with the police force, than defending people "who are trying to evade the law." Shit, in my state, it would probably be political suicide to go against the police. Why? Because all the people who don't live in cities have more voting power than those of us who actually have to live with the consequences of their vote.
the only thing worse than NOT accurate facial recognition is the ACCURATE version coming soon.
Well here's what each of us can do. Stop posting photos on social media. And delete everything that's already out there in case they really don't have access to that and its just a control/scare tactic. Erase, delete. What's more important showing off or a chance at any privacy in a distopian world?
Never been happier to have a fulfilling social media presence without using my real face. Thanks furry lol
That a pawfect way to not get identified :3
That Clearview guy looks like Lord Voldemort's it guy.
He is.
I thought he looked more like Martin Shkreli after leaving prison and having "found" grunge.
Harry Potter sucks
I bet he's gay and had an intense sexual relationship with Lord Voldemort then.
Spooaoai
"Like Skynet But Not Evil"
Up Next:
HAL9000 Laptops: "You can't do that, Dave."
ULTRON brand Roombas "A Murder rate of less than Five Percent!"
BORG Smartphones "Resistance to our savings is futile!"
Most people: "Shut up and take my money!"
Raechel Jackson fr-Ward tnfnooz
"Borg smartphones?" I thought that was AT&T.
I don't know if I should download that new XANA anti-virus software. Its on sale so...
And we can enjoy all that while drinking Soylent.
I live in Saudi Arabia and this would be terrifying. Especially with the error rate. There will be so many lives wrongly ruined.
That is my concern as well. Even a fairly low error rate can still be a nightmare for those falsely accused. The very fact you were accused, even if you're later found not guilty, can harm your reputation and limit your career options.
Ruined? Do you mean "ended"?
Looks like it will be a great tool to falsify evidence, as if DNA tests weren't bad enough.
@ Haha, that sounds reasonable, so, probably not a thing. I'm glad I don't live in America, for example, because I heard a lot of bullshit about credit debt scores and such.
Stay safe friend
Naming it skynet is actually brilliant.
It is a constant reminder of what can go wrong.