WarGames (8/11) Movie CLIP - It's a Bluff (1983) HD

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 415

  • @michaelairton3723
    @michaelairton3723 8 років тому +1462

    It took me a long time to realize this fully, but General Beringer is a great character.
    He's prepared to destroy the Soviets, which is exactly what his job requires of him -- he shouldn't be in that position if he isn't. But he's not a demagogue, and he's not beyond listening to reason. He wants nuclear weapons in the hands of people rather than machines, and his concern on this turns out to be well-founded. When he declares Defcon One, he looks genuinely anxious and appropriately solemn, like he wants to lose his shit emotionally but knows he can't because he's in charge.
    When Falken explains convincingly why the supposed Soviet attack can't be real because it doesn't make any sense, Beringer listens and ultimately agrees -- knowing that, as the person who will advise the President and on whose advice the President will issue the fateful order, he's basically the most powerful person on earth at that moment. He alone devises the method by which they'll determine if the attack is real or not (getting the senior controllers at the first three US impact targets on the radio while ordering readiness to launch missiles if they lose radio contact), and when it's clear the attack isn't real, he's overjoyed.
    Basically, throughout the movie his instincts and decisions are correct on the basis of his job and the information at his disposal.

    • @3001st
      @3001st 7 років тому +101

      After he retired, he moved to Alaska and became the mayor of a tiny town. :D

    • @Significantpower
      @Significantpower 6 років тому +48

      And fought off a Soviet invasion in an alternate timeline.

    • @arserobinson7118
      @arserobinson7118 6 років тому +3

      He was not so great in Stir Crazy as the corrupt incompetent Warsen.

    • @joeboyd8702
      @joeboyd8702 6 років тому +11

      Really well written.

    • @achievebig5315
      @achievebig5315 6 років тому +8

      He's general Carvel from the C&C red alert

  • @ReaLifeHDchannel
    @ReaLifeHDchannel 6 років тому +463

    I like how the General keeps saying he doesn’t trust the decision-making machine, but Falken has to remind him not to be a decision-making machine.
    And what a great character!

    • @gerardpleasant
      @gerardpleasant 5 років тому +4

      You betcha!

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому +10

      That was the sentence that convinced the General. That feeling of getting suckered into thinking like a machine was right on his face. Beringer's the kinda guy I would have definitely served under with pride.

    • @Ori0n1975
      @Ori0n1975 Рік тому

      He said he’d piss on a spark plug if he thought it would do any good.

    • @derekjolly3680
      @derekjolly3680 Рік тому

      Uncle Bob as a General. He was good.

    • @johngilmore697
      @johngilmore697 4 місяці тому

      the enemy would attack without provocation, using so many missiles, bombers, and subs so that we would have no choice but to totally annihilate them?
      Does any that really make sense? Isn't that exactly would they would do?
      "have no choice but to totally annihilate them?" Again, isn't that exactly what the USA would do?

  • @AlanCanon2222
    @AlanCanon2222 3 роки тому +172

    I was 14 when this came out in theaters. I'm 51 and I still think it packs a punch. I showed the movie to my 14 year old stepson a few years ago, and he was riveted by it (he is into the history of the microcomputer revolution). I asked him whether the old tech depicted in it got in the way of his enjoyment, and he immediately defended the movie, saying, "No, it's a classic!"

    • @jamestmather
      @jamestmather 3 роки тому +4

      It’s a fantastic film. Watched it again last night.

  • @foggynotion7
    @foggynotion7 2 роки тому +80

    "General, do you really believe that the enemy would attack without provocation, using so many missiles, bombers and subs that we would have no choice but to totally annihilate them?" Brilliantly delivered line, and an incredibly gripping scene.

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 10 років тому +1034

    Scary thought: Something like this really happened in September 1983. A computer error showed a Soviet Missile commander that the US had launched an attack. This was just after the Soviet Air Force shot down a Koren airliner killing several Americans, including a Congressman. Tensions were very high at the time, but instead of launching his missiles at once he waited long enough to realize his computers were giving him a false signal

    • @erictaylor5462
      @erictaylor5462 10 років тому +35

      ***** That makes no scenes at all. The doctrine at the time, and still today, is to get the missiles out of their silos and on their way to targets before the silos are hit. The idea is that you want to strike the enemies weapons before they are launched. The accepted doctrine has been that this is impossible. With so many eye's watching both sides it would not be possible for your missiles to reach their targets before the enemy sees them coming and launches their own missiles. Having dummy launch buttons would delay the launch of your missiles by too much time. The missile commander pushes the button, waits, realizes nothing happens, tries again, still nothing. He calls his boss to explain the problem but by the time he calls HIS boss he is vaporized before he can explain. Your side loses the nuclear war because you never launched. The missile commanders MUST have the authority and ability to launch in case of attack. You only have about 20 minutes from the time you see them coming to when they arrive. This is not nearly enough time for the regular chain of command to work, which takes hours.
      I think what you read was just another urban legend.

    • @thir671
      @thir671 10 років тому +5

      i never heard nathing about that thanks

    • @erictaylor5462
      @erictaylor5462 10 років тому +10

      ***** So that makes it true? People never lie when they right these articles? You need a lesson in skeptical thinking. If it doesn't make scenes it isn't true.
      The time it would take for the calls to be made to get permission to launch be far greater than the time it would take for the bombs to arrive, especially if the bombs were launched from submarines and the attack was a complete surprise.
      This fact ALONE casts doubt on the truth of the article, and that's assuming you really did read such an article.

    • @Com18Alpha
      @Com18Alpha 10 років тому +61

      Ah yes, the Able Archer 83 incident.
      -------Warning: Rant incoming----------
      NATO ran a nuclear war game simulation involving most of the NATO command structure. It occurred some time after KAL 007 incident and when most of the Politiburo was filled with "old men" with failing health and losing adequate perception. KGB as well as listening outposts picked up the NATO com traffic, but due to the peculiar structure of the soviet intelligence they were not allowed to make local detailed analysis, so the raw information was forwarded to higher command echelons without proper local interpretations on the nature of the information. So for that, the Soviet High Command never understood that it was a command exercise and believed it was preparation for a First Strike.
      The incident was further aggravated by the suspicious launch detections on soviet satellite screens. But it was later discovered to be a glitch from the computer that mistakenly interpreted the particular position the sun coming out from behind the earth as launch trails. The officer in charge noticed it since he was already familiar with the unreliable computers, belayed the order to relay the false intel to higher command, and reboot the computer systems. But in a stroke of bureaucratic incompetence, he was relieved of duty and the problems associated with the computer system were not addressed
      There was a rumor that at one point, another computer had a chip failure that also reported incoming missiles. It was said that the soviets were so close to launching their missiles that the ultimate reason that they never launched it was because someone entered the launch codes incorrectly. Shortly afterward, the incoming threats disappeared, and then diagnostic tests revealed the chip to be the culprit. Yeah, rumor, hoax, myth, whatever it was, that was fucking scary.
      The entire event ended, when NATO concluded the AA83 exercise, and the Soviets then realized that it was just a simulation. No one in the US or NATO intelligence circle knew about the Soviet actions that were taking place, until a Soviet Double Agent supplied the intel. Reagan realized that by going all "evil empire" on the soviets, the soviets became more paranoid and, when combined with poorly structured intelligence circle, really believed any aggressive posture by NATO is an attack and was risking an all out WWIII. Some people believed this was the moment when Reagan was trying to find if there was anyone in the Kremlin he can actually talk to. He got his wish when he met Gorbachev.
      But yeah this incident is basically a 1-2 minutes to midnight on the Doomsday Clock.
      ---------Rant over-------------------

    • @erictaylor5462
      @erictaylor5462 10 років тому +13

      Com18Alpha What I'm talking about has nothing at all to do with Able Archer '83. That event took place 2 months AFTER (in November) what I'm talking about.
      I wonder how many times we came within SECONDS of a nuclear war?

  • @bradleysmith3121
    @bradleysmith3121 3 роки тому +69

    I met Barry Corbin a year ago in Claremore, Oklahoma when he received an award. I spent a couple of hours with him. He is not much different in life as the character he portrayed in War Games. It was an honor to meet him.

  • @Watcher3223
    @Watcher3223 4 роки тому +69

    _"John, good to see you! I see the wife still picks your ties."_
    And recall earlier in the movie, where McKittrick said to Lightman that Falken didn't understand the practical uses of his work?
    This scene pretty much proves that Falken understood it better than McKittrick, especially when he tells General Beringer that he's "listening to a machine."
    Technologists must acknowledge that the technology can fail as well as when it can work.
    It also calls to mind an episode of Star Trek, from Spock of all people, from the episode "The Ultimate Computer."
    _"Computers make excellent and efficient servants. But I have no wish to serve under them."_
    And that's, perhaps, that's the biggest flaw in McKittrick's evaluation of the WOPR's worth: he has placed it above that of the people who use it.

    • @samsonguy10k
      @samsonguy10k 3 роки тому +4

      McKittrick was dangerously close to convincing himself that he created WOPR. I like to think that after this crisis he got sent out to pasture and they let Falken oversee WOPR's decommissioning before going back to retirement. With maybe David getting a little job helping with network security in Peterson AFB

  • @dkibler1974
    @dkibler1974 5 років тому +142

    The key phrase in this entire movie, the turning point, is when Falken asks, "But does it make any sense?" Pivotal moment.

    • @tnetroP
      @tnetroP 3 роки тому +8

      Totally agree. I didn't realise it when I first saw the film when it was released. But looking back now as an older and wiser person, it was the point in the film that both man and machine realised that nuclear war could not be won and did not make sense.

    • @emirlsanchos6302
      @emirlsanchos6302 2 роки тому +2

      @@tnetroP Hence Joshua's "It's a strange game. The only winning move is not to play."

    • @geerstyresoil3136
      @geerstyresoil3136 2 роки тому +2

      Yes, it was a pivotal movement, but not the key point or lesson of the movie. As this wasn't the end of the movie, Joshua (the AI) still wanted to fire nukes back at the Russians. So the key point was teaching the AI that in a mutually assured destruction scenario no one wins.

  • @schusterlehrling
    @schusterlehrling 4 роки тому +48

    He got him with the line "General, you are listening to a machine"

  • @robertcornhole5197
    @robertcornhole5197 8 років тому +480

    Pretty insightful considering something like this actually happened to the Soviets in 1983.

    • @Cybernaut76
      @Cybernaut76 8 років тому +106

      This really happened to both, Americans *AND* Soviets. The Soviet colonel in charge during a critical moment refused to retaliate because he believed USA would not launch five missiles but at the very least hundreds. Americans did not fall for the false alarm either but wrote off the erroneous computer program after several false alerts.

    • @sparrowlt
      @sparrowlt 6 років тому +42

      also in 1995 with Boris Yeltsin..
      Finish scienstist launched a weather rocket .. russian alert stations detected it and command tought it was a first nuclear warhead to be detonated very high above Moscow so the EMP would dissable radars and sensors and as many systems as posible to seriously blind them and limit any posible retaliation... and then the attack would follow .. the catch was that if they wanted to act it needed to be before the warhead detonated above them..
      fortunatelly cooler heads prevaled again
      funny fact: the rocket launch had been properly notified to russian air space control.. someone there fucked up monumentally not informing the missile command

    • @tbeller80
      @tbeller80 6 років тому +6

      And Yeltsin was drunk as a skunk at the time (as he often was).

    • @Willaev
      @Willaev 6 років тому +21

      Yeah, the incident at NORAD in 1979 where they thought 2200 Soviet missiles had been launched was the basis of the movie.

    • @Seriona1
      @Seriona1 5 років тому +1

      @@Willaev There is no way it was 2200 Missiles. USSR never produced ICBM's beyond 400.

  • @grahamyodude
    @grahamyodude 5 років тому +35

    2:08 "one minute to impact" *anxiously blinks uncontrollably*

  • @adrianbooth438
    @adrianbooth438 2 роки тому +20

    Ronald Reagan watched this movie and asked the SecDef(?) to investigate whether this scenario was possible. A week later he came back and said something like "its worse than that." Leading to a LOT of work to increase human decision points in the loop.

    • @DG-yo3tk
      @DG-yo3tk 8 місяців тому

      Are you sure you’re not confusing that with “the day after tomorrow”?

    • @Hypogean7
      @Hypogean7 3 місяці тому

      @@DG-yo3tk Reagan was 2 months from death when that movie came out, so no.

  • @tbob8212
    @tbob8212 5 років тому +83

    1:25 Mom what did you do in military? I joined the Air Force and my job was to conduct a countdown over the PA system at the end of the world ☺

  • @pdex2165
    @pdex2165 3 роки тому +34

    "Mr. McKittrick...after very careful consideration, sir, I've come to the conclusion that your new defense system sucks." - General Beringer

  • @gumballrally427
    @gumballrally427 7 років тому +170

    "Do the world a favor and don't act like one."

    • @VivaMessico
      @VivaMessico 6 років тому +1

      why is that piece of shit smiling all the time? does he think wiping out millions of people is some kind of joke?

    • @amw6394
      @amw6394 6 років тому +1

      That line gives me chills

    • @jbFromNYC
      @jbFromNYC 6 років тому +5

      Growing up, I thought that he was smiling all the time, too. But, later on, I realized that he just has one of those faces that makes it LOOK like he's smiling all the time.

    • @mnlaaf9340
      @mnlaaf9340 5 років тому

      So don’t like a bot, I gotcha ya

    • @mikegallant811
      @mikegallant811 4 роки тому

      True.

  • @Jay-vc8qk
    @Jay-vc8qk Рік тому +9

    I love Ally’s facial expressions when the bombs are hitting - the fright, horror and sadness all in one. Tremendous acting.

  • @therookpiece
    @therookpiece 5 років тому +22

    Still a highly watchable movie. Great stuff.

  • @erictaylor5462
    @erictaylor5462 7 років тому +59

    "Yes Sir, I do too." What do you suppose he does too? I'm betting Regan said, "I hope you're right"

    • @robertwalling9010
      @robertwalling9010 6 років тому +7

      I like turtles.

    • @stephenhuntsucker3766
      @stephenhuntsucker3766 5 років тому +12

      I always add Reagan’s voice saying, “I hope you’re right General.” before Barringer says, “I do too.”

    • @happyjohn1656
      @happyjohn1656 4 роки тому +2

      I was thinking the same thing! "I pray to god... something... you're right" too?
      12:46 AM (yep!)
      12/27/2019
      Merry Christmas!

    • @mindriot91_96
      @mindriot91_96 4 роки тому

      @James Miller lol. "Yes sir, that's why I'm quite portly"

    • @47imagine
      @47imagine 3 роки тому +3

      Reagan: "Btw, I like jellybeans."
      General: 2:06

  • @christhompson6010
    @christhompson6010 4 роки тому +12

    This movie had a huge impact the time it released in the early 80,s because of the fear of a nuclear war. Millennial's look at this and laugh but seeing this in the theaters scared the hell out of a lot of people.

    • @M-o-s-u-r-a
      @M-o-s-u-r-a 3 роки тому +2

      Listen Boomer, I am Gen Z and the idea of nuclear war makes me piss my pants.

  • @ConcreteSurfer420
    @ConcreteSurfer420 6 років тому +50

    LOL seen this a million times I know the outcome but it still gets me on the edge of my seat and my heart racing

  • @christopherhollen3167
    @christopherhollen3167 2 роки тому +15

    It took this long for someone to ask “does it make any sense?” John Wood was perfect in this role. Same for Barry Corbin as the general.

    • @ilttpvvm
      @ilttpvvm 3 місяці тому

      Wars rarely make sense-that’s one reason that they are so terrible.

  • @KevKoster-yq5nx
    @KevKoster-yq5nx 5 місяців тому +2

    R.I.P. Dabney. Thank you for blessing us with so many great roles!

  • @marcwisti338
    @marcwisti338 3 роки тому +16

    Falken: "It's a bluff, John. Call it off."
    McKittrick: "No, it's not. It's real."
    Falken: (I'm wasting my time talking to you.)

    • @sa_si_ra
      @sa_si_ra Рік тому

      Falken could say this too (at this point): Look, I don‘t have time for a conversation right now !

  • @BlacKnightRising
    @BlacKnightRising 5 років тому +8

    Gen Beringer was my favorite character badass thru 'n thru....

  • @stanleyhornbeck1625
    @stanleyhornbeck1625 6 років тому +29

    I would be very reassured if a real life Gen.Berenger was in charge!

    • @DaDitka
      @DaDitka 3 роки тому

      ABSOLUTELY!!!

  • @robertwilson214
    @robertwilson214 2 роки тому +4

    John wood was such a brilliant actor. So communicative

  • @helipilot27
    @helipilot27 8 років тому +84

    Such a well eritten movie for it's time...and what a time it was!! Go Atari!!!

    • @emuhill
      @emuhill 7 років тому +2

      Except for one thing. The hacking scenes are not very realistic. Such as getting help and listing the games contained in the WOPR from a login screen. In reality that would not happen.

    • @thedungeondelver
      @thedungeondelver 7 років тому +1

      For me, the opening sequence in the LCC (Launch control capsule) with the two missileers and the last 10 minutes in NORAD make up the totality of the film. Oh! And John Wood's excellent "Nature knows when to give up" speech along with David's retort.

    • @rob99201
      @rob99201 5 років тому +1

      GO IMSAI 8080! (That's the computer that David actually used...) "I want to plaaay those games..."

  • @parlmc
    @parlmc 4 роки тому +3

    after all these years it hasn't aged a single bit. kudos to all the people involved: actors, screenwriters and all!

  • @sillysod33
    @sillysod33 4 роки тому +7

    "Look, I don't have time for a CONVERSATION right now!" Greatest line ever.

  • @marshalltravis3217
    @marshalltravis3217 Рік тому +1

    I have always loved the lady who is doing the countdown,,,

  • @CathyKitson
    @CathyKitson 6 років тому +8

    1:46 That look he gave him, as if to say: "You'd better be right!"

    • @tylisirn
      @tylisirn 4 роки тому +2

      Even if he's wrong, nothing he does will stop the missiles en-route and US has enough second strike capability to still annihilate the Soviets even after a first strike lands.

  • @phillipstankey8881
    @phillipstankey8881 4 роки тому +6

    This actually happened in real life about the time this movie was made...in reverse. The Soviets thought we were prepping for war. Their systems detected a limited nuke launch by us...their missle jockey thought "they wouldn't just launch three or four missiles" so he broke from protocol and didn't launch. Turns out that they were just a few weather balloons

  • @justanotherlikeyou
    @justanotherlikeyou 3 роки тому +3

    "I'd piss on a sparkplug if I thought it'd help!"

  • @Jirehgarcia173
    @Jirehgarcia173 9 років тому +38

    Scares me a lot considering something similar to this happened...
    September 26, 1983: The False Alarm in the Soviet Union. I really thank God he classified them as false.

    • @Willaev
      @Willaev 6 років тому +5

      November 1979, at NORAD.

  • @samsignorelli
    @samsignorelli 3 роки тому +3

    Accurate uniforms....nicely done. 'Course, I wore one myself. Seeing that A1C brought back memories (I think her hair's in regs, as well.)

  • @johncooper7694
    @johncooper7694 8 років тому +41

    This movie is about the ridiculousness of a nuclear war. The music stops if this happens.

    • @ferbthe2gadgetguy
      @ferbthe2gadgetguy 8 років тому +4

      John Cooper you don't get it huh?
      The whole movie is about the "what if" and the possibility of the worse(and the only)effect of MAD.
      The world almost ended in the Cold war but nowadays does the world care? We're slowly killing ourselves better than hat MAD can do to us.

    • @a.whiteman4182
      @a.whiteman4182 7 років тому

      You don't believe a Nuclear war can be won?

    • @monam3739
      @monam3739 7 років тому +1

      A. Whiteman No .

    • @a.whiteman4182
      @a.whiteman4182 7 років тому +1

      You have not heard about the Neutron bomb.

    • @a.whiteman4182
      @a.whiteman4182 7 років тому +2

      Well yeah, the Neutron bomb is a tactical weapon instead of a strategic weapon like the Atom bomb or H bomb is. In other words, it is used for a small but well defined area... say a 1,000 yard radius. Anything outside of that radius...no damage. Anything inside of it...destroyed. It is a weapon meant to win on the battlefield. It's not been used in warfare yet.

  • @thesmirkingwolf
    @thesmirkingwolf 4 роки тому +4

    Barry Corbin is a legend.

  • @F5Storm1
    @F5Storm1 5 років тому +11

    Nobody in their right mind would launch all those missiles for no reason

    • @jediagh
      @jediagh 3 роки тому

      Skynet would. :)

    • @johnhaladay5541
      @johnhaladay5541 3 роки тому +2

      A terrorist state like Iran would. Terrorists have proven that they believe they have nothing to lose.

    • @davidsloat1016
      @davidsloat1016 3 роки тому +1

      Nobody in their right mind... which is what makes Kim so scary... he definitely isn't all there.

  • @fredlandry6170
    @fredlandry6170 5 років тому +5

    I loved this movie when I was a kid!

  • @joshuariddensdale2126
    @joshuariddensdale2126 2 роки тому +3

    "General, you are listening to a machine. Do the world a favor and don't act like one". That single line makes this movie. And is it just me, or does Melvin sound almost exactly like the nerdy kid in The Polar Express?

    • @merleinaustin
      @merleinaustin Рік тому

      Melvin is the same person as the one in Polar Express.

  • @lrmcatspaw1
    @lrmcatspaw1 3 роки тому +1

    1:24 SO THAT is the person with the ROBOT voice!
    Ive watched so many movies and I never knew it was her!

  • @HsiPingChu
    @HsiPingChu 7 років тому +19

    Whoever put that short tie on the actor playing the general should get retroactively fired. Just saying.

    • @LOLHAMMER45678
      @LOLHAMMER45678 5 років тому +2

      Air force uniform item. You'd have to blame the pentagon

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 5 років тому +4

      The person responsible for sacking the costumer, has just been sacked.

  • @danielduckington5789
    @danielduckington5789 6 років тому +9

    The scary thing is whilst this is a film, there was a real incident of a Russian missile commander receiving information of inbound ICBMs on his computer screen indicating the US had launched an attack on the USSR. He decided not to tell his superiors because he reasoned the US would not attack without warning with just a few nuclear weapons and believed it was a fault in the system. This ironically happened in 1983 by Lt. Colonel Stanislav Petrov

    • @Willaev
      @Willaev 6 років тому +1

      It was based on an actual incident that occurred at NORAD in November 1979, when a training scenario was accidentally loaded into the operations' computer and they thought 2200 Soviet missiles had been launched.

    • @gorillaau
      @gorillaau 6 років тому +1

      Willaev "This is not a training exercise."

    • @bpj1805
      @bpj1805 5 років тому

      You have it backwards. Petrov deduced that the US would not launch just a few missiles but would initiate with an all-out attack. There's no "warning shot" in nuclear war.

  • @Oleoay
    @Oleoay 3 роки тому +3

    You know he's not a demagogue when he doesn't immediately through Falken out and later turns over the entire computer network so that a kid can play tic-tac-toe. You have to be a pretty smart, confident guy to allow for that kind of input.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 3 роки тому

      That isn’t exactly how it went…

  • @curtisberard7831
    @curtisberard7831 5 років тому +1

    Beringer. Greatest movie general. Ever.

  • @amazingman63
    @amazingman63 6 років тому +9

    Nukes are the ultimate "if i cant own the world then neither can anyone else" weapon

    • @gorillaau
      @gorillaau 6 років тому +2

      amazingman63 We'll all glow together.

    • @McLarenMercedes
      @McLarenMercedes 5 років тому +1

      amazingman63 Only in a world ruled by stupid mafia thugs. Speaking of which even the mafia knows to avoid bloodshed. Nukes are actually a Mexican standoff on a global scale. This is why nobody is insane enough to try and attack first. Ironically they guarantee peace. Why? Because everybody is extra careful and think several steps ahead to prevent anything from spiraling out of control. Anyways, stupid thugs lack the ability to see the long-term consequences of their stupid actions and this is why they are petty criminals living on borrowed time. People in charge of nuclear weapons aren't petty criminals who have seen Scarface a hundred times.

    • @Kr0nicDragon
      @Kr0nicDragon 3 роки тому

      Nagasaki and Hiroshima says hellow

    • @blobgooll9395
      @blobgooll9395 3 роки тому

      @@Kr0nicDragon Yeah genius...they didn't have the nukes on their side did they?

  • @sha11235
    @sha11235 2 роки тому +3

    I'd love to hear Reagan respond to this film.Too bad in his diary he didn't write about seeing this film, although I'm sure he did. Update: Checking information on this film, I see he did see it at Camp David.

    • @tommym321
      @tommym321 2 роки тому

      He was very affected by “The Day After” (1983)

  • @Exparcelman
    @Exparcelman 3 роки тому +1

    The great John Wood, such an underrated actor.

  • @falcon3268
    @falcon3268 4 роки тому +4

    I am sorry to say this but can you imagine what David's reasoning for missing school will be when he returns, the teacher asks him for a excuse his response probably would've been. "I nearly started WW 3."

  • @Ericstrains
    @Ericstrains 9 місяців тому

    On the commentary track for the DVD, the director says the line "General, you are listening to a machine. Do the world a favor and don't act like one." was really the crux of whole movie. I totally agree.

  • @memowilliam9889
    @memowilliam9889 5 років тому +1

    If you listen to the count down it goes from “1 minute to impact” to “1 minute 10 seconds to impact” and then back to “1 minute to impact”
    Someone forgot to check the details on that in the editing room.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 3 роки тому

      The countdown is correct on the dvd version.

  • @SuperScorpion6969
    @SuperScorpion6969 16 днів тому

    I miss the movies from the 80s. So full of imagination and adventure.

  • @VelvetWhore
    @VelvetWhore 3 роки тому +1

    MAD.
    Mutually Assured Destruction.

  • @zdunne
    @zdunne 5 місяців тому

    RIP Dabney Coleman and John Wood

  • @happyjohn1656
    @happyjohn1656 4 роки тому +1

    1:54 That was a long 10 seconds!
    12:45:00 AM (yep!)
    12/27/2019
    Merry Christmas!

  • @davidareeves
    @davidareeves Рік тому

    This movie is so old, it was before the direct line to the president was upgraded to DEFCON red.
    Great memories, one of the earliest movies I saw as a kid

  • @jasonbishop1092
    @jasonbishop1092 8 років тому +6

    computers....hallucanate ....YES. only if programed?

  • @williammason475
    @williammason475 6 років тому +2

    Greetings Professor Falken

  • @44excalibur
    @44excalibur 3 роки тому +2

    Google the story of Stanislav Petrov in 1983 and you'll see how this all nearly happened in 1983 for real. Petrov saved the world.

  • @sinkingdutchman7227
    @sinkingdutchman7227 7 місяців тому

    The officer with the perfect voice to do a countdown cracks me up. It's almost as if the air force hired her for that reason alone

  • @plezetta2985
    @plezetta2985 2 роки тому +1

    NEW ERA

  • @pop5678eye
    @pop5678eye 6 років тому +2

    If you want to read up on what happens when it is the real thing, look up Operation Giant Lance by Nixon...

  • @kittenscatsangelsgods1157
    @kittenscatsangelsgods1157 5 років тому +2

    It's RobbieAngelRobot 0:16 ! ! See that's what happens lost
    consciousness

  • @davedee6745
    @davedee6745 9 місяців тому

    I like how those characters have visitor I.D. badges. They drove a jeep through a gate, ran at top speed and then...had to sign in and get visitor badges.
    So much for being in a hurry.

  • @schusterlehrling
    @schusterlehrling 3 роки тому +1

    The key argument he confined Barringer was the notion that he is listening to a machine.

  • @michaelanderson2886
    @michaelanderson2886 5 місяців тому

    R.I.P. Dabney Coleman!

  • @slimj091
    @slimj091 3 роки тому +1

    It helps that it was established early on that the General didn't trust the technology to begin with.

  • @Archie2c
    @Archie2c 3 роки тому +1

    Greetings Professor Falken.

  • @lucasp1813
    @lucasp1813 5 років тому +4

    In this reality "skynet" was averted because the coder of the AI was not a boastful overconfident jackass. he understood the thinking of his AI and thus understood the problem at hand.
    skynet's coders are "we have a problem, let's google it." "i dont know why this code does not work; let me google it." "this code works, and i dont know why, so let it be."

  • @pschroeter1
    @pschroeter1 3 роки тому

    "We're still here."

  • @flankspeed
    @flankspeed 3 роки тому +2

    After very careful consideration, he came to the conclusion that Kittrick's computer system sucks. 👍😎

  • @jefferee2002
    @jefferee2002 2 роки тому

    It was one thing to watch this scene as a kid, a totally different experience as an adult.

  • @alexandriaoccasional-corte1346
    @alexandriaoccasional-corte1346 6 років тому +5

    Would be interesting to know what the President said on the telephone...
    President: I'm shitting my pants right now.
    General: Yes Sir, I do to.

    • @Harppuunamies
      @Harppuunamies 5 років тому +1

      Also what the President says to Keith David on the phone in Armageddon when the secondary protocol is about to take place and he says to the president ”Sir, maybe we should” and then the President hangs up.

  • @rbryant100
    @rbryant100 8 років тому +8

    Totally inaccurate. SAC and NORAD could have confirmed a launch by early radar warning (PAVE PAWS). Second, the National command authority can only authorize a release, by the two man rule of the President and Sec of Defense in agreement. A much better portrayal is the climax of The Sum of all Fears.

    • @ferbthe2gadgetguy
      @ferbthe2gadgetguy 8 років тому +12

      rbryant100 I'm not the sharpest pencil in the pencil case but you do remember that this was in the cold war right?

    • @walther007
      @walther007 6 років тому +1

      @ferbth2gadgetguy, I don't understand your statement. The Cold War lasted until shortly after the Berlin Wall fell, with the collapse of the Soviet Union. This movie is based off going to war with the Soviet Union. In terms of the PAVE PAWS, the first two went operational in 1980, two years prior to the movie, with two more going active after the movie time-line. Now, my statement is...that if the WOPPR was hooked into the system, it could have put false readings into the radar results... In terms of the SEC DEF, he could have been with the President, we have no info on that.

    • @stargazer7644
      @stargazer7644 3 роки тому

      Please try to pay closer attention. In this movie BMEWS (the ballistic missile early warning system) was what was tracking the missiles over the poles. Remember the guy saying “confidence is high”? That was the guy confirming the BMEWS radar tracks. Pave paws mostly watches the Atlantic and Pacific coasts and the Bering sea and was still being deployed in 1982. BMEWS watches over the pole. It was very accurate, right down to them wondering why the DSP sats didn’t give a launch detection. WOPR could fake BMEWS tracks, but not DSP data.

  • @apelikemenace
    @apelikemenace 3 роки тому +3

    I like how ally sheedy can play sort of a dumpy geek,
    and then in the next movie be a total hottie.

  • @MrDunn490
    @MrDunn490 2 роки тому +1

    But does that make any sense!? Does what make any sense!? That! Look I don't have time for a conversation right now!!! Me: Killed It!

  • @frankblackwell9321
    @frankblackwell9321 3 роки тому +1

    You picked a hell of a day for a visit lol

  • @timesnewlogan2032
    @timesnewlogan2032 6 місяців тому

    “Yes Sir, I do too.”
    I love how you can immediately tell what the president said, with only three words.

    • @timesnewlogan2032
      @timesnewlogan2032 4 місяці тому

      @nicksterj “I got some jellybeans. You like jellybeans?”

  • @rustymason3860
    @rustymason3860 Рік тому

    "Well, duh, we never thought of that."

  • @ri_god
    @ri_god 4 роки тому +1

    There is so much truth hidden in this film.

  • @darrenstephens8857
    @darrenstephens8857 4 роки тому

    I was there it was only two ICBMs and WOPA is an AI programme. I got to fly from UK to USA in 3 hour's Lockheed Martin A12 Blackbird because I played games via a modem.

  • @d.j.8059
    @d.j.8059 2 роки тому

    Dr. Falken wasted a good 20-30 seconds before he gave the General his best argument: that the Soviets wouldn't commit suicide by launching an all-out attack, knowing that NATO would respond in kind. He probably could have gotten through to the General faster if he'd said it earlier; giving everyone more precious time to re-think and call off the xounter-attack.

  • @historicallyintriguing-q2p
    @historicallyintriguing-q2p 19 днів тому

    it's a bluff - call it off

  • @mr.nibblenips4231
    @mr.nibblenips4231 6 років тому +3

    1 minute to impact...

  • @jasonbishop2164
    @jasonbishop2164 3 роки тому +1

    Don't!

  • @botanicalspotlight
    @botanicalspotlight 3 роки тому +1

    I can only imagine John Lennon playing Steven Falcon!

  • @tarekamin4816
    @tarekamin4816 Рік тому

    The first attempt from skynet

  • @Moeflyer6213
    @Moeflyer6213 15 днів тому

    This scene reminds me Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker. A scene that the top brasses gathered in NORAD without the POTUS. They believed the Soviet nuclear launches were real, though Big Boss called the Secretary of Defense and explained those data were made up by Hot Coldman, the branch director of CIA in Central America. However, most the people refuse to believe that because they assumed those data were real and voted for retaliation. Therefore, Big Boss have to destroy Peace Walker by sabotage the AI brain on board the PW (like he killed The Boss). Fortunately, the "soul" of The Boss led PW to sink into the bottom of Caribbean Ocean and stopped the false data transmission.

  • @RiDankulous
    @RiDankulous 3 роки тому

    Dude on the left at the end has a requisition that needs signed and it's past due!

  • @themvtrooper
    @themvtrooper 4 роки тому

    Wow how can he not see that

  • @SXentinel
    @SXentinel 4 місяці тому

    Acojonante como está película predijo los delirios de la IA...

  • @Blade666324
    @Blade666324 3 роки тому +1

    is it me or was General Beringer in red alert counterstrike and red alert 2?

  • @outbackgearforu
    @outbackgearforu Рік тому +1

    Imagine what chatgpt could do?

  • @hanzfranz7739
    @hanzfranz7739 3 місяці тому

    Ah yes the 80s and 90s when a bunch of teenagers could get access to the most secret and protected military facilitites.

  • @yshchrist3015
    @yshchrist3015 3 роки тому +1

    Wargame (2)020: Theatrewide Biotoxin and Chemical Warfare?

  • @erich84502ify
    @erich84502ify 6 років тому

    He is fired

  • @colinstarford5544
    @colinstarford5544 6 років тому +2

    Control, Alt, delete, restart! :-)

  • @Alaninbroomfield
    @Alaninbroomfield 3 роки тому

    EXCELLENT film.

  • @volvoguy804
    @volvoguy804 3 роки тому +1

    Didn't this same actor talk about "bluffing" in Jumping Jack Flash?

  • @gabevachon326
    @gabevachon326 5 років тому +2

    Faulkan never did find a paleantologist.

    • @gerardpleasant
      @gerardpleasant 5 років тому +1

      Oh, you're high school students. Well, you're on my land. Now - path, follow path, gate - open gate, through gate, close gate. Last ferry leaves at 6:00 so run, run, run.