Transitive vs Substitution Video

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @musicenthusiast5550
    @musicenthusiast5550 4 роки тому +13

    OH MY GOD! This helped me understand SO WELL! I can’t believe I’m taking advanced algebra and I couldn’t understand the difference between these two properties until I saw this video. Thank you!

  • @charlieullrich5251
    @charlieullrich5251 5 років тому +13

    Thank you I have a test today and I still didn’t know the difference 😂

  • @FranciscoRamirezPerez-j7l
    @FranciscoRamirezPerez-j7l Рік тому +2

    Thank you, I had this question arise for geometry and I couldn't figure it out. Thanks again, now I can teach it correctly.

  • @Дмрд.джи
    @Дмрд.джи 2 роки тому +2

    the. entire. side. That was all I needed to hear. Thank you.

  • @J_Grisak
    @J_Grisak Рік тому +1

    Thank you so much! I have a geometry quiz today, and I wasn't understanding, but this helped so much!

  • @iamomegaboss
    @iamomegaboss 10 місяців тому +1

    Why is this not substitution? It was not explained:
    given: j+k=r+s, t=r+s
    Therefore j+k=t
    Why can’t I say I’m substituting t for for r+s???

  • @taef_25
    @taef_25 4 роки тому +3

    Thank u so much this was very helpful really appreciate ur time and effort

  • @wangshiny3510
    @wangshiny3510 4 роки тому +3

    This is soooo helpful, thanks a lot.

  • @wangshiny3510
    @wangshiny3510 5 років тому +2

    This is awesome, it really helps.

  • @Alexabcdefghijklmn
    @Alexabcdefghijklmn Рік тому

    which property do you use if it’s

  • @mr_legendaryguy9870
    @mr_legendaryguy9870 3 роки тому +1

    So you are saying that when an entire side of the equation matches I could use either, but also that you can only use transitive property when an entire side matches? Doesn't that mean that the transitive property is completely useless?

    • @clhardy5
      @clhardy5 3 роки тому

      Since there is no substitution property of congruence.....It makes transitive property relevant? Or am I missing something

    • @aaronanderson9469
      @aaronanderson9469 3 роки тому

      I agree

    • @jackllewellynkramer
      @jackllewellynkramer Рік тому

      Thank you so much for this comment and thread, this was my thoughts exactly.

    • @patriciatresnan3122
      @patriciatresnan3122 Місяць тому

      Yes, if I understand correctly, the Transitive Property is a subset of Substitution, and completely unnecessary.

  • @percizeshwty6485
    @percizeshwty6485 6 років тому +2

    It's the math giraffe from NASA

  • @helenaran928
    @helenaran928 6 років тому +4

    Thank you so much, this was so helpful😄

    • @mathgiraffe1039
      @mathgiraffe1039  5 років тому +1

      Hi Helen, sorry I missed your comment before! Thank you! :) I am so glad to hear it was helpful for you. I appreciate it! Have a great weekend,
      Brigid

  • @fluufy2676
    @fluufy2676 3 роки тому

    so helpful!!!!1

  • @carlosramirez6092
    @carlosramirez6092 Місяць тому

    THE ONE PIECE IS REEEAAAAALLLLLLLL