Kugelblitz Black Holes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 бер 2024
  • Black Holes can swallow anything, even light, and small black holes made from light itself may offer us abundant clean energy and a pathway to the stars.
    Learn more about the game and see it in action at upperstory.com/turingtumble/?...
    Use the coupon code ISAACARTHUR for 10% off your total purchase
    Join this channel to get access to perks:
    / @isaacarthursfia
    Visit our Website: www.isaacarthur.net
    Join Nebula: go.nebula.tv/isaacarthur
    Support us on Patreon: / isaacarthur
    Support us on Subscribestar: www.subscribestar.com/isaac-a...
    Facebook Group: / 1583992725237264
    Reddit: / isaacarthur
    Twitter: / isaac_a_arthur on Twitter and RT our future content.
    SFIA Discord Server: / discord
    Credits:
    Kugelblitz Black Holes
    Episode 440; March 28, 2024
    Produced, Written & Narrated by: Isaac Arthur
    Graphics:
    Jeremy Jozwik
    Ken York YD Visual
    Music Courtesy of: Epidemic Sound epidemicsound.com/creator
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 311

  • @harbl99
    @harbl99 Місяць тому +180

    So to generate Kugelblitz Black Holes we need access to a vast quantity of degenerate matter contained in one location. ... Hmm ... "Hey 4chan, we got a job for you..."

    • @robertmiller9735
      @robertmiller9735 Місяць тому

      Wrong kind of degeneracy, sadly🙁

    • @higgsbonbon
      @higgsbonbon Місяць тому +4

      Meanwhile the archists are using the Sharty as their black hole seeds. The final form of coalposting.

    • @robertmiller9735
      @robertmiller9735 Місяць тому

      @@higgsbonbon Uh... [googles] (artists drawing buildings in famous art forms) using ("I don't care what anybody thinks" social meme) to create black holes. Which is (really lazy and uncreative). Now I KNOW I'm a time traveler! 😃

    • @higgsbonbon
      @higgsbonbon Місяць тому +4

      @@robertmiller9735 wow, literally nothing you just said was correct, I'm impressed.

    • @robertmiller9735
      @robertmiller9735 Місяць тому

      @@higgsbonbon 😆Well, I did try, unlike many another gray-beard. Just you wait 'till 2060, young person [shakes finger]. So... what did you say?

  • @robynsnest8668
    @robynsnest8668 Місяць тому +141

    Wow, never hit one of the new videos so quickly. This is the power generation of Romulan Starships.

    • @bertdemeulemeester
      @bertdemeulemeester Місяць тому +18

      Jolan'tru! My fellow Trekkie😉

    • @pusmaster
      @pusmaster Місяць тому +3

      Did you know the Romulan heart itself is grey?

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Місяць тому +39

      I'm not sure if that was their first appearance as a power source in scifi for a spaceship, but TNG was the first time I heard of it. I tihnk it caught my imagination even way back then. :)

    • @robynsnest8668
      @robynsnest8668 Місяць тому +21

      @@isaacarthurSFIA It would be interesting to see how many real life PhDs were started because of a childhood love of where "No man has gone before."

    • @edstoutenburg3990
      @edstoutenburg3990 Місяць тому

      There was a Jp Manga series totled '2001'nights where Earth develops a micro Black hole drive. It was a pretty good at staying grounded i real science . ​@@isaacarthurSFIA

  • @iainballas
    @iainballas Місяць тому +97

    In a sci-fi RP that was of fairly grand scope, the party and I managed to destroy a massive enemy space station using a Kugelblitz. We actually all ended up learning more astrophysics than we wanted to (no regrets) during that game. We ended up using several (hundred thousand) ultraviolet or Microwave (can't remember which) emmiters about a light-month out from the target, in a giant sphere, pointed at the center. The idea was that it would be undetectable until the last second, and when all the energy converged in a single place, for an instant... it would create a black hole right around the enemy station.
    Of course, FTL ruins EVERYTHING, so a few FTL sensors managed to warn the Enforcers of our plan, and they managed to soak up enough light that it was just a spectacular light show. But we got 'em later with the old 'freeze yourself until everyone forgets you exist while building a superweapon in dark space between the galaxies' trick.

    • @Fenhum
      @Fenhum Місяць тому +8

      that sounds so fun what the heck

    • @CookieCutVids
      @CookieCutVids Місяць тому +16

      You need to make content. I'd watch the shit out of that🤣🤣

    • @iainballas
      @iainballas Місяць тому +4

      @@CookieCutVids my face, voice, and personality are barely tolerated by my friend and family, not sure they'd do well on youtube XD

    • @djt08031996
      @djt08031996 Місяць тому +1

      ​@@iainballaswow. And all I've done with it in comparable RPs is use one as the antispark of a cybertronian whose armor is made of neutronium

  • @AndyJP
    @AndyJP 22 дні тому +5

    In Harry Potterverse: "Magic so dull is indistinguishable from muggle technology."

  • @alexandretorres5087
    @alexandretorres5087 Місяць тому +41

    Kugelblitz Black Holes! Love them. Ultimate battery. Probably impossible to exist. Why they are so underappreciated in science fiction?

    • @ze_kangz932
      @ze_kangz932 Місяць тому +23

      Because authors (for the most part) ain't scientists

    • @OmenDCUO
      @OmenDCUO 28 днів тому

      It was used for Umbrella Academy Season 3

  • @MrAWG9
    @MrAWG9 Місяць тому +39

    Seriously, how do you not have a million subscribers yet? Proof that life is not fair.

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Місяць тому +18

      Bit of a niche show, I'm still shocked we got to even 100,000 subs :)

    • @garethdavies2595
      @garethdavies2595 Місяць тому +5

      Quality not quantity

    • @getsideways7257
      @getsideways7257 Місяць тому +3

      Just look into what kinds of shows are those 10M+ channels, and I believe you'll find your answer :)

    • @ArawnOfAnnwn
      @ArawnOfAnnwn Місяць тому

      @@getsideways7257 Well the largest category of them are mostly music channels, so...

    • @getsideways7257
      @getsideways7257 Місяць тому

      @@ArawnOfAnnwn And how is that any better than just watching stupid stuff on YT?

  • @brokeneyes6615
    @brokeneyes6615 Місяць тому +47

    … is this where Gene Roddenberry got the idea for the Romulans power generation?

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Місяць тому +25

      Not sure, but probably, black hole conversation was very popular in the late 80s and early 90s and hawking radiation was already a pretty accepted theory by then.

    • @shadowhenge7118
      @shadowhenge7118 Місяць тому +6

      Imagine yelling "Emergency power!" Snd everyone just spits at the engine. The romulans are more human than the humans.

    • @partciudgam8478
      @partciudgam8478 Місяць тому +6

      ​@@shadowhenge7118emergency power! That's what the redshirts are for!...
      But actually it would be backwards, you take matter off to get that extra oomph, you put matter to slow the engine (crazy, and I love that!)

  • @cheradenine1980
    @cheradenine1980 Місяць тому +5

    OGs Grabbing a drink and a snack for this one …

  • @atashgallagher5139
    @atashgallagher5139 Місяць тому +11

    We managed to make something even more cumbersome than the gold standard if we start using these things as currency.

    • @Ozymandius_corn_maze
      @Ozymandius_corn_maze Місяць тому

      They're not as unwieldy as black holes, but you should check out rai stones

    • @trumpetpunk42
      @trumpetpunk42 Місяць тому +1

      In what way(s) is gold cumbersome?

  • @cannonfodder4376
    @cannonfodder4376 Місяць тому +36

    Saw this twice on Nebula, and I still will need to wafch it again. Big numbers just go right over my head, unfortunately.
    Informative as always, Isaac.

  • @atashgallagher5139
    @atashgallagher5139 Місяць тому +8

    Apple would probably still find a way to fack up the battery life on one of these. "Oh new kugelblitz model just dropped" old one stops recharging.

  • @SkylerLinux
    @SkylerLinux Місяць тому +6

    Hawking Radiation is best described with Strings and Waves, a Black Hole's event horizon pinches the Quantum waves; allowing only certain wave-lengths. The waves travel in different directions, normally cancelling out, however when the Event Horizon forms that disrupts the cancellation effect. Which is why Positive always leaves and Negative goes in.

    • @trumpetpunk42
      @trumpetpunk42 Місяць тому +2

      14:15 this all sounds like voodoo pseudoscience to me, similar to string theory. Yet it seems to have near universal acceptance. So apparently I'm missing something - Is this actually testable?

  • @StacheMan26
    @StacheMan26 Місяць тому +5

    I'm not sure if it's the best analogy, but I quite like the sound of "cutting into the true vacuum with a honking big laser", it speaks to me and I may have to steal it.

  • @leafykille
    @leafykille Місяць тому +11

    I liked the warped and hot metal analogy best, but I'm a builder and work with metal rather more than most people, it's probably best to have several different ones for different people.
    It seems to me that any black hole with a lifetime measured in days isn't so much a power source or battery, as it is a time bomb. You can't feed it and it will go bang before very long in a very energetic way.

    • @olivergrabowski4278
      @olivergrabowski4278 Місяць тому

      I like the bending metal analogy best too. It seems to make the most sense.

  • @tiffanynajberg5177
    @tiffanynajberg5177 Місяць тому +21

    Bozons sound like one of those weird sailor ranks that no one knows exactly what they do.

    • @jackvos8047
      @jackvos8047 Місяць тому +6

      Bosuns are in charge of keeping the vessel in shipshape.

    • @tiffanynajberg5177
      @tiffanynajberg5177 Місяць тому

      @@jackvos8047 Is that a high rank? I really dont know much about boats lol

    • @jackvos8047
      @jackvos8047 Місяць тому +3

      @@tiffanynajberg5177 it's above the regular crew but below the command crew

  • @Joat2
    @Joat2 Місяць тому +5

    At 17:30 it occurred to me that if your spaceship engine could fold space behind you, pretty sharply, you could direct hawking radiation out your tail pipe for infinite thrust. Or in front of you with your acme ray gun blaster pistol.

  • @almcdonald8676
    @almcdonald8676 Місяць тому +1

    I come out of your vids with my soul singing then Dave Kipping drags me back down to earth with a bump with his mathematical analysis of the tiny trickle of stupidly high energy output from these constructions

  •  Місяць тому +2

    I'm going to start saving black holes for my descendants, great financial advice!

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver Місяць тому +2

    9:20 I love how you presented ceres the same way they did scene transitions in the expanse. Totally wicked cinematic tribute imho

  • @isaacchang8887
    @isaacchang8887 Місяць тому +4

    I absolutely LOVE your videos Isaac! This channel is such a comfort and joy to me! I thought I’d mention that this was the first video where I noticed a distinct absence of your iconic “wascally wabit” speech impediment! You’ve been improving ever since this channel has started but for whatever reason your voice seems so polished in this one! I’m so happy for you, keep up the amazing work!!

  • @nolimetangere2364
    @nolimetangere2364 Місяць тому

    Don’t ever stop. Your format is amazing. I love how you are able to draw me into a subject.

  • @atashgallagher5139
    @atashgallagher5139 Місяць тому +2

    So those are what the energy credits in Stellaris are

  • @cyberherbalist
    @cyberherbalist Місяць тому +2

    Many years ago, I came up independently with the idea of using a blackhole as the energy source of a spaceship. I say "independently" because i didn't read about it elsewhere at the time. Hooray for me, right? 😂
    Well, anyway, the purpose of my "invention" was for a science fiction novel I never wrote -- beyond a few snippets. I'd still like to write that novel, but the procrastination is currently at 40 years.

    • @Just.A.T-Rex
      @Just.A.T-Rex Місяць тому +1

      If not now when?

    • @JariDawnchild
      @JariDawnchild 21 день тому

      I've had one kicking for...how long now? I lost count, probably ~30yrs? Maybe a few less?

  • @ASlickNamedPimpback
    @ASlickNamedPimpback Місяць тому +6

    last time I was this early, i was typing text to speech in moonbase alpha

  • @ccvcharger
    @ccvcharger 19 днів тому

    Two concepts that I like here, using a laser so powerful that it cuts through spacetime, and the idea of spaceships using blackholes as batteries and pulling up to these lasers like they’re charging ports.

  • @tommyboii3066
    @tommyboii3066 Місяць тому +1

    Your content has gotten so good over the last two years I love it so much!

  • @bbbl67
    @bbbl67 Місяць тому +1

    One possibility is that Planck Mass black holes, the smallest black holes you can get, cannot evaporate due to Hawking radiation, because it takes so much energy to evaporate such black holes that the energy itself would create another black hole of the same size. These would make them the most stable black holes in the universe, even more stable than hypermassive black holes. These could also be what we call dark matter particles.

  • @DeclanMBrennan
    @DeclanMBrennan Місяць тому +9

    I thought the bozon was the *quantum of comedy* from Bozo the Clown?

    • @MrRolnicek
      @MrRolnicek Місяць тому +1

      Much like a clown, you can fit a lot of them into a small car.

    • @ericmarch9857
      @ericmarch9857 Місяць тому

      😂😂😂

  • @sixtenwidlund4258
    @sixtenwidlund4258 Місяць тому +5

    I’m now a proud Nebula subscriber supporting SFIA directly!!

  • @DanielGenis5000
    @DanielGenis5000 Місяць тому +3

    This is wonderful; black holes are fascinating, and in your treatment I know that I will have my mind blown!

  • @CaidicusProductions
    @CaidicusProductions Місяць тому

    I so appreciate all the knowledge you share with us, Isaac. Thank you for everything you do.

  • @gabrielwolffe
    @gabrielwolffe Місяць тому +1

    I was playing around with this concept recently, though for a battery that stores energy as light instead of an electrochemical potential. There is (sort of) a way to create a perfect mirror for many wavelengths of light (if my understanding of the physics is correct) and that is "Total Internal Reflection." If light traveling from a dense and transparent medium to a less dense one hits the interface between them at a certain angle, it reflects back into the dense medium and remains there; e.g. for light going from glass to air, that angle is about 45 degrees.
    In theory you could make a glass disk and dump as much light as you wanted into them for energy storage, even to the point of them turning into kugelblitz black holes. In practice though the glass tends to occasionally absorb some of that light (because no material is 100% transparent) and reemit it as heat, and in proportion to how much energy is stored in it; the more energy stored, the hotter it gets. I'm just having a hard time nailing down whether or not it could store that light for long enough to be a practical energy storage medium; does it turn into heat almost immediately, or does it linger as light long enough to be pulled out again hours or even days later? I'm not sure, and the numbers I've looked up to try and calculate this give me wildly different answers.

  • @jayboydakid8299
    @jayboydakid8299 Місяць тому +1

    I’m a big sci-fi person, always was. I appreciate your shows Issac, you given us a lot of knowledge over the years!!I got a question on this episode- black holes- without sounding to confusing- my question is - Hubble introduce to us that the universe is expanding right? A black hole is described as a massive dark hole which stretches lights years across , and nothing escapes once objects or light enters it right? They just confirmed there’s one at the center of our Milky Way. So is our galaxy getting smaller?
    I always found that confusing but than again it’s simple math isn’t it?

  • @ObeyNoLies
    @ObeyNoLies Місяць тому +2

    I have thought for a long time that singularities are the energy source of the distant future and aliens. A singularity allows you to 'burn' all baryonic matter, not just fusion fuel, and has a higher rate of mass to energy conversion. With the power of singularities civilizations could exist for astronomical periods of time and utilize resources much more efficiently.

  • @PHOBOS1708
    @PHOBOS1708 Місяць тому +1

    when Isaac starts to throw the million billion trillion you know, it's black hole time 🕳️

  • @aclearlight
    @aclearlight 4 дні тому

    Lovely work and great science review!

  • @JBlandie
    @JBlandie Місяць тому

    Been waiting for this for like 5 years!

  • @cameronhunt5967
    @cameronhunt5967 Місяць тому

    I like the description of a koogleblitz as bending a sheet and using the energy that radiates out as the sheet relaxes. It emphasizes that black holes aren’t perpetual motion machines and the image of rolling more matter into the depression to store more energy is intuitive

    • @cameronhunt5967
      @cameronhunt5967 Місяць тому

      It is not though I think the best explanation for someone interested in the more accurate physics. It’s a good intuition builder though I think

  • @sid2112
    @sid2112 Місяць тому +3

    Dang good timing!

  • @marcelgrabowski5939
    @marcelgrabowski5939 Місяць тому +1

    What I have to say, another amazing episode about technologies with numbers that have delightful amount of zeroes.

  • @davidbolton8282
    @davidbolton8282 Місяць тому

    Things have been a little slow at work. Listening to Isaac's videos helps keep my mind from wondering off and getting lost. Thank you.

  • @robertmiller9735
    @robertmiller9735 Місяць тому +2

    Brought to mind are Fred Pohl's Gateway series, that features a kugelblitz made from massed energy beings, and Charles Sheffield's Proteus series, in which Oort Cloud colonies are powered by (naturally occurring) mini holes. Until someone figures out how to talk to them...

    • @paulblase3955
      @paulblase3955 Місяць тому

      The Heechee made their kugelblitz by moving stars. They were fleeing the energy beings. 😅😅One question is: can you have a black hole that does not have a singularity in it?

    • @robertmiller9735
      @robertmiller9735 Місяць тому

      @@paulblase3955 I thought it was the Galactic core black hole the Heechee moved stars into, but if they made it that way, it wouldn't be a kugelblitz. And the kugelblitz was definitely where the energy beings were, Albert the Einstein simulation had a freak out about it.

  • @immortaljanus
    @immortaljanus 26 днів тому

    Kugelblitz! Sehr schön, Ja!

  • @dariustiapula
    @dariustiapula Місяць тому +6

    We become Romulans.

  • @Kargoneth
    @Kargoneth Місяць тому +1

    Turing Tumble. Interesting idea.

  • @trumpetpunk42
    @trumpetpunk42 Місяць тому

    That "Turing Tumble" ad at the end - Shut up and take my money! Looks like the coolest thing since "Computer Engineering for Babies"

  • @paxdriver
    @paxdriver Місяць тому

    I love Thursdays thanks you Isaac Arthur. Not since Friends was still on the air have I look forward to new episodes on Thursdays lol

  • @MardrukZeiss
    @MardrukZeiss Місяць тому

    Good explanation.

  • @abiku2923
    @abiku2923 Місяць тому

    I've been waiting 9 years for this video

  • @dasMobius
    @dasMobius 4 дні тому

    Hi Isaac!
    There are Quantum Electrodynamic (QED) effects (e.g. the Schwinger effect and the Breit-Wheeler process) which may well prevent the formation of Kugelblitz black holes. See "No black holes from light" by Alvarez-Dominguez, et al. This preprint was uploaded to arXiv gr-qc May 3, 2024.
    The authors find that as electromagnetic energy collapses, in the attempt to form a kugelblitz, the said QED effects give rise to the creation of electron-positron pairs which are accelerated away from the system at ultra-relativistic velocities. The authors claim that this drains energy from the system in a way that strongly prevents the creation of the black hole "in any realistic scenario" (to quote the phrasing in said preprint).

  • @jakoblevantinus9113
    @jakoblevantinus9113 Місяць тому

    I like all of the metaphors for Hawking radiation. Different neuropsychologies will appreciate different ones, and so they are all useful.

  • @FelizTheLifeguardMinion3
    @FelizTheLifeguardMinion3 Місяць тому

    I’ve been a HUGE ISAAC ARTHUR SUPPORTER for a long time. I would like a phone call from ISAAC sometime. This channel should have a contest for the chance to talk on the phone or via video chat. This is my demand! 😂❤🎉

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Місяць тому

      Easiest way to make that happen is to volunteer as one of our forum moderators or editing team :)

  • @williambarnes5023
    @williambarnes5023 Місяць тому

    So to explain virtual particles and why we always get the "positive" one, it helps to understand that probabilities in quantum mechanics are squared. Squaring a negative number gets you a positive one. Taking the square root of a negative number gets you an imaginary one. The direction that a black hole curves space in is imaginary, going in the direction 𝒾 compared to our normal space. The different energies follow different paths as a result of the forces acting on them. The odds of you observing the negative particle are-- negative. So you see either -1 negative particles, or 1 positive particles. Which is the positive one. And the black hole sees either 𝒾² positive particles, or -𝒾² negative ones. Which is the always negative one.

  • @hyrumhanson3390
    @hyrumhanson3390 Місяць тому

    Sweet this is gonna be lit

  • @Zetverse
    @Zetverse Місяць тому +1

    This intro, damn😮

  • @thorin1045
    @thorin1045 Місяць тому

    for the what is more understandable: the best is the most rue, that it is a requirement of the bending space time itself (as long as the current math is true, but probably any better version will have this effect still, just like the newtonian math stays in place after we boosted it with relativity or quantum fun.) and so the hawking radiation is part of any energy gradient when present, just insignificant even in most black holes, let alone anything more normal.

  • @AmantePatata
    @AmantePatata Місяць тому +5

    Hi Isaac, in this episode you talked about using black holes to power ships. But how would one actually move a black hole? Could shooting it with lasers add Velocity, or would a gravity well be needed?

    • @John-ir2zf
      @John-ir2zf Місяць тому +2

      'Moving' a black hole could be accomplished. But the more direct method would be to create the singularity right where it is needed in the case of kugelblitz black holes.
      The larger black holes can be moved with electromagnetism since all black holes are presumed to be Kerr black holes, spinning and with a charge.
      Using gravity could be a method as well, but it would essentially require you to create another black hole near the one you wanted to move, and the created black hole would need a descent percentage of the other black holes mass in order to pull the original one.
      I see the better method as using large plates charged with the repulsive charge (opposite the black hole) to push the black holes charge field away from the plates.

    • @AmantePatata
      @AmantePatata Місяць тому +2

      @@John-ir2zf True, electromagnetism was not on my mind. I was thinking along the lines of creating a sort of gravitywell 'carpet' out of micro blackholes that feeds back into the main blackhole, moving it along the created slope in space. Additionally, could placing the blackhole in front of the spaceship act as a sort of alcubierre drive? Not in the ftl sense, but wouldnt the warping of spacetime help in achieving higher speed?

    • @John-ir2zf
      @John-ir2zf Місяць тому

      @AmantePatata in the sense of the ship falling down the slope of the curve spacetime, yes. But you still have the issue of needing to push the black hole ahead of yourself to keep the curvature moving forward.
      I believe you would encounter the effect of, net zero movement, as the ship tries to fall down the slope of curvature, the repulsion to push the black hole ahead (and move the curvature so you continue to fall) would equal out. The pushing of the black hole would push you back up the curvature.
      There 'may' be work arounds though (i say 'may', but this patent is spoken of in present case terminology, NOT hypothetical terminology). The US gov has a patent on a device that allows extraordinary things.
      If you have a good understanding of physics, search this patent number, US10144532B2
      You'll be astounded, truly !!!

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Місяць тому +3

      As John mentioned, the default notion is to make it a charged and rotating one and drag it that way, for a spaceship drive, if it is feedable you could also prod it with a matter beam. I tend to be fairly dubious on making this work for a fast accelerating spaceship though

    • @John-ir2zf
      @John-ir2zf Місяць тому

      @isaacarthurSFIA hello Issac.
      UA-cam doesn't seem to like any comment I post that asks people to search this patent number, US10,144, 532, B2 (minus the commas and spaces so that youtube doesn't hide or remove this comment, like every other time I post it)
      If you have a minute, or several days to digest the information, look it up.
      The implications are astounding and this patent, held by the US gov, isn't spoken of in hypothetical terminology. The language is present case.
      You have the physics understanding to see the profound implications of this device....

  • @johnsmith-vn9cs
    @johnsmith-vn9cs Місяць тому

    personnally, the illustration that worked best for me what the bent spacetime "metal" heating up.

  • @wagon9082
    @wagon9082 Місяць тому

    Good video

  • @vinniepeterss
    @vinniepeterss Місяць тому

    love it❤

  • @DominoPheonix
    @DominoPheonix Місяць тому

    kugelblitz is a great word

  • @Ruzz-wd7it
    @Ruzz-wd7it Місяць тому

    Hey I have a question. How much would I have to feed a kugelblitz black hole to keep it going if it is just big enough to injest a single atom at a time?

  • @jockeb2651
    @jockeb2651 Місяць тому +2

    Arthursday!

  • @nirorbach8046
    @nirorbach8046 Місяць тому

    I think about a physical obstacle to produce high energy photons for the proposed production of a black hole:
    above ~1MeV a photon may be splited to an electron-positron pair...

  • @peacepoet1947
    @peacepoet1947 Місяць тому +1

    Glass covered solar panels have a huge problem being on Earth. They are subject to damage by hailstones. The sooner, the better for building solar farms above the clouds. I'm not sure how sun storms will affect solar panels that are above the clouds. Objects that move in those areas would also be a problem unless artificial intelligence could analyze data from approaching matter, that can damage the solar farm could fire a lazer to change the direction of approaching space debris.

  • @TiagoTiagoT
    @TiagoTiagoT Місяць тому

    I kinda like the explanation that Hawking radiation is the result of particle-wave duallity, and the sharpness of the sudden cut of continuity of the event horizon and/or the tight curvature of space density surrounding the blackhole, produces harmonics, kind like how if you try to make a square-wave sound, if you zoom in close enough to the edge of the square wave-form you see a bunch of ringing even if originally the source did produce a mathematically perfect vertical edge surrounded by flatness. Though my understanding is not complete, as this doesn't explain the part where it makes the blackhole lose mass; and it just remains a given due to how thermodynamics forbids the total energy/mass of the universe changing so it needs to be balanced by removing mass from the blackhole. Maybe it turns out the black hole doesn't lose mass from it's own perspective, and it's symmetrical if you consider all perspectives...

  • @damenwhelan3236
    @damenwhelan3236 Місяць тому

    The space between the 2 particles is so distorted that upon emergence they part inatead of annihilate

  • @P________
    @P________ Місяць тому +1

    Homestar got smart

  • @calebkirschbaum8158
    @calebkirschbaum8158 Місяць тому

    What would happen if you were to create say a 10x10x10 grid of 1Mton or less black holes? Would the hawking radiation be able to be absorbed more from other black holes, causing the system as a whole to gain mass? There is much more space in the volume for particles to appear, than on the outside. And you could likely put larger black holes on the outside anyways for less hawking radiation.
    Could that work, or am I missing a few too many parts?

  • @williambarnes5023
    @williambarnes5023 Місяць тому

    3:24 "There are some black holes that are less dense than thin air in the universe at large." Such as for example, the universe at large.

  • @FrancisFjordCupola
    @FrancisFjordCupola 21 день тому

    People can say black holes can swallow everything... but people have yet to feed them marmalade. Not that anyone with a love for astrophysics would ever do that...

  • @dard1515
    @dard1515 Місяць тому

    I like to compare the curvature of spacetime to the curvature of a road. The sharper a turn is, the more force you feel.

  • @codybergman5991
    @codybergman5991 21 годину тому

    2 questions: how do you transfer power from a black hole to usable energy? If you used a warp drive that would produce Hawking Radiation and fry those within the warp bubble could you apply the same energy transfer mechanisms to the outside of the ship to harvest that as an energy source?

  • @Soulwrite7
    @Soulwrite7 Місяць тому

    Always wondered why no one else questioned that only the negative side of the virtual partical fell in! (or at least with a negative bias).
    Until now, I thought it may have had some similar reason relating to there being more matter than antimatter. Though I did see a video asserting that a moon-sized mass of anti-matter would grow, not shrink a black hole; raising questions as well.
    Are there any recommendations you could make on a video that explains this radiation phenomenon, why the math demands it, and where the particles/photons actually come from?

  • @partciudgam8478
    @partciudgam8478 Місяць тому

    This episode gave me the mixed feeling of relief and dissapointment that Styropyro won't be able to do something like this in the next 5 years😅

  • @logex621
    @logex621 Місяць тому +1

    Greetings!

  • @animistchannel
    @animistchannel Місяць тому

    This is functionally equivalent to zero-point energy. I mean, a source with tera-terawatts for billions of years? That's as good as infinite for practical purposes.

  • @rubikfan1
    @rubikfan1 Місяць тому

    6:50 so what happens first. Foton becoming a blackhole or wavelengte hitting planc length?

  • @Mernom
    @Mernom Місяць тому

    If we ever develop tech that can manipulate the curvature of spacetime, it would be able to act as a throttle for those black holes.

  • @russellnolan9212
    @russellnolan9212 Місяць тому

    That was dense.
    So, it's not really much bigger, yet so much more.
    Fusion first.

  • @jhwheuer
    @jhwheuer Місяць тому

    Right, this makes me think of Hyperion and The Big Mistake.

  • @taft58
    @taft58 Місяць тому

    Would not the wavelength be limited to plank length so would that still allow the creation of a black hole?

  • @Warchin007
    @Warchin007 Місяць тому +1

    progress😇

  • @xXevilsmilesXx
    @xXevilsmilesXx Місяць тому

    Any mention worthy progress with AI involved physics research?

  • @Mr.Nichan
    @Mr.Nichan Місяць тому +1

    27:53 That chart says all astrophysical black holes are LESS dense than neutron stars? How is that possible? Why aren't all neutron stars black holes, then?

  • @Myxinidae
    @Myxinidae Місяць тому

    Mistake at about 4:30 : not everything made out of fermions is a fermion.

  • @sciencenengineering-ls6yy
    @sciencenengineering-ls6yy Місяць тому

    Issac could we stack graphene sheets offset by one atom so as the subsequent sheet fill in the honey comb between the atoms once the sheet reaches the required thickness.

  • @Electric_Bagpipes
    @Electric_Bagpipes Місяць тому +1

    My biggest question and concern is how to move micro-blackholes around usably. You couldn’t bring one planet-side, and what happens when you hit the throttle? Do you have an laser or something set up in the opposite direction the engine is facing that can somehow impart the same amount of motion on you multi-gigaton nugget of doom that your advanced fusion or maybe even photon drives can impart the ship? Ok, say we can do that. Say we can do that without massive thermal losses in the laser completely negating any power generation coming from the black hole passively. What if someone rams your ship from the side? I don’t think a pusher beam of that kind of power can suddenly be slewed 90* while still maintaining focous on something atomic in scale, or even say a 6 beam setup from all sides managing to ramp up power that quickly. Theres just so many issue with direct pushers, and thats assuming they actually do work. For all we know, even newton doesn’t work on event horizons. Perhaps the inertial energy doesn’t get imparted, and just gets absorbed as mass energy. At this point the only thing we have evidence of that can move a black hole from outside influence is gravity itself.
    If you ask me my money is on dark matter particle beams ;)

  • @dwightpries8330
    @dwightpries8330 27 днів тому

    Dumb question… would the mass of a black hole power source grossly affect a ship’s ability to maneuver, accelerate and stop? Would thrust output always be chasing inertia and never catching it?

  • @doomslayer7719
    @doomslayer7719 Місяць тому +1

    Oddly enough, punching a hole with a laser into the quantum foam to unleash the true vacuum out into reality.
    At least that was the idea that best translated how a black hole normally curves space-time to get the energy we want out.
    Are black holes natural Zero-Point Energy emitters, filters, or some other variation of the take on being a ZPM access "device?"
    Along with the rest of the various natural ways to get something truly dense to do the same thing.

  • @peterburgess9735
    @peterburgess9735 Місяць тому

    I like the second explanation of hawking radiation "leaking" from the extreme warping of space time... but would it definitely radiate as photons? Why not tiny gravitational waves instead?

  • @Deletirium
    @Deletirium Місяць тому

    One issue I've never heard an explanation for in these usages, is how would one tether the micro black hole to the spaceship, so that it doesn't just zip between the ship's atoms when engines engage?
    Would a ultra-uniform sphere arrangement of particle guns "feeding" it work from radiation pressure? Is it even possible in any way to exert pressure on a black hole, at any size?

  • @DavidConnerCodeaholic
    @DavidConnerCodeaholic Місяць тому +1

    it whouldn't surprise me if there were a ChaosHead or Steins Gate plotline that strongly features kugelblitz black holes, but I've never heard of them.

    • @Shin_Lona
      @Shin_Lona Місяць тому

      Too much divergence from that worldline.

  • @Raye938
    @Raye938 Місяць тому

    Thanks for clarifying the energy dissipation of black holes, but I've got a question on that. in the analogy of the fabric of space time releasing the energy, how is the energy reduced in the black hole itself from this process?

    • @Shin_Lona
      @Shin_Lona Місяць тому

      I think a better question is: how can energy be released from spacetime in the first place? Time and space are parameters, they have no substance. The energy has to be coming from something else.

    • @bjornragnarsson8692
      @bjornragnarsson8692 Місяць тому

      @@Shin_Lona​​⁠​​⁠​⁠​⁠​⁠it comes from quantum field modes essentially “snapping” at the outer horizon during the period of formation and equilibration of rotating black holes based on QFT predictions in curved spacetime (like Hawking researched in the 70’s) and our current best experiments researching physical analogue black holes. The quantum superfluid ones being the most realistic for modeling quantum spacetime structure around the ergosphere, outer, and up to the inner horizon because of the superfluid properties during lab experiments.
      Spacetime is full of quantum fields though. That is why for instance, an electron positron pair can annihilate into two gamma ray photons, each of 0.511 MeV (the rest mass of each particle) with opposite momenta. Or a high energy gamma ray can scatter off of an atomic nucleus producing an electron and positron from the vacuum due to the additional rest mass of the nucleus capable of exchanging sufficient momentum with the photon to generate a particle-antiparticle pair.
      In high energy particle colliders, electrons are capable of penetrating into the interior structure of a proton and generating a chain of energetic particle decays with unconserved baryon and flavor number, revealing an intricate internal structure of valence and sea quarks/antiquarks amidst the gluon color-anticolor exchange and particle formation. Fermi Lab, LISA - the heavy ion collider at CERN (Pb-208), and the LHC have executed hundreds of tests with billions of collisions in which valence quark separation always results in a quark-antiquark pair bound by a gluon that surface from the QCD vacuum, converting a portion of the energy input of the collision into greater mass at the scale of the strong interaction.

    • @Raye938
      @Raye938 Місяць тому

      @@Shin_LonaUh, not my question though.

  • @Myria83
    @Myria83 Місяць тому

    What about using Kugelblitz black holes as transportation means? Wormholes?

  • @adamreynolds3863
    @adamreynolds3863 Місяць тому +1

    lets hope that if black hole physics are being messed with that WHOEVER better do it off planet. if anyone reading this can enforce that i think youll wanna do that quickly

  • @Andrew-lo5sc
    @Andrew-lo5sc Місяць тому

    Some times light or a photon just "seems" to simply indicate a new direction had been created in expansion. One that didn't exist at the moment the Universe underwent reionization.

  • @jclark2752
    @jclark2752 Місяць тому

    The image that stuck in my mind, when it came to black-hole power generation, was one of wringing energy out of the space/time fabric… twisting and squeezing it like a wet cloth. For what it’s worth… 🤓

    • @jclark2752
      @jclark2752 Місяць тому

      Add to this the idea that the quantum level space “foam” is made of energy and anti-energy…
      By Squeezing and Twisting the Fabric of Space/Time you Split Up these Pairs,
      And that the black hole "prefers" the "anti-energy".
      So, we get the energy output, and the anti-energy falls into the black hole.
      Only, "eating Anti-energy" Actually makes the black hole "smaller" until it "evaporates" and disappears.

    • @Shin_Lona
      @Shin_Lona Місяць тому

      Spacetime has no substance though - time and space are essentially concepts. It would be like wringing energy out of a number... it doesn't make any sense.
      Forget the fabric analogy and just stick with spatial dimensions - shapes and whatnot, X/Y/Z axis, that sorta thing. Space is the container that holds the matter / energy. If there is energy, it has to be from something - meaning there isn't really a vacuum. It isn't empty, there is something there. This is actually a very old concept... traditionally, it was called ether. Physicists will just come up new terms like "quantum foam" when they have to invent something to make their equations work.
      Look at it like this... in classical physics we have things like "2nd Law of Thermodynamics"... sounds real official, like they know what they're talking about, right? In quantum physics we get stuff like "spooky action at a distance"... these MF-ers don't have a clue what's going on. Think about how much technology and the other sciences have advanced in the last hundred years. What has quantum physics actually accomplished in this time? They're at a dead end, they just haven't realized it yet.

    • @jclark2752
      @jclark2752 Місяць тому

      @@Shin_Lona the video asked what sort of Analogy was most Helpful in understanding the Concept…
      I thought the 'wringing out' portion was helpful in conceiving how a Smaller Black-hole would be More Effective at generating energy than a Large one, as it is better at achieving a tighter and 'smaller' 'twist'…
      It obviously Must be a simplification, and must represent complex systems as loosely congruent representations.
      The trick is to find that middle ground between conceptualization, and actuality, which is beyond most people to grasp comfortably.

  • @ryandoesstuffapparently1540
    @ryandoesstuffapparently1540 Місяць тому

    Would a micro black hole be a plausible explanation for certain types of Fast Gamma-ray Bursts?

  • @HughesMahdavian-zm7gc
    @HughesMahdavian-zm7gc Місяць тому +1

    Whoa