@@PelicansCourtsideClubI don’t think it was due to UA-cam censorship. He had an exclusivity contract with Spotify. That contract has come to an end and he can upload to other platforms.
Peter Zeihan is one of the best salesmen I've ever seen. He skims through a broad range of information, retains it, and then presents it with a cadence so perfect it exudes confidence. He gives the impression that his knowledge is as deep as the Mariana Trench, even if it’s sometimes more like a kiddie pool. I've met many good salesmen in the financial sector who are on par with his ability, but he's definitely one of the best. He's good enough to land the coveted after-lunch slot at government, banking, and finance conferences. I've been at a couple of useless conferences he's spoken at. He's fun, and usually keeps people from slipping out to take care of "important" things.
Let’s get an epic podcast, then. I want to see a group cast with Vivek , Theo, Elon, Zach Whittaker, Tulsi, and Bill Maher. Musical Guest; In Living Color
It always makes me skeptical when someone has a concise answer to everything, as if complex relationships can be boiled down to witty statemments and the future is a linear projection.
@@lfnt7069it’s been HiS Job His Entire Life. When Your View of the world is the Screen In Your Hand. That is the Size of Your Playing Field. PZ travels the World and is Engaged in it. Unlike most People in Merica that Chant USA USA every touchdown Their team scores…. A limited view… Good Morning…..
@@lfnt7069He doesn't have 5 hours to sit and give lectures about politics and geopolitics. If you're that invested just read books and follow news from sources that have been fact checked to a higher degree. Peter isn't linear at all. At all instances he gives multiple situations of what could happen. If you're not convinced then follow his channel and see for yourself.
Joe and his people really need to do a follow up interview here with Peter, i believe this episode is about a year old so another episode would line up perfectly. Revisit the talking points and aee where it all stands now. Peter might not be 100% correct on everything but people would be foolish not to listen and take note of what he says.
@@sinesaiisometimes you are just riffing with the boys and next thing you know you are spitballing in India to a conference of business executives about how to take geo political advantage of Chinas imminent collapse
Show his old predictions that are wrong then. He's been making predictions for a very long time now, he talked about the Russian invasion YEARS before it happened.
Thanks Joe,I never watch an episode without learning or swaying my opinions.I have enjoyed watching your transformation from new information that you received.Love ya bro!Just for transparency I’m a 65yr old white man from the hills of Tn.People like you give me hope for the future of my granddaughter.😎🇺🇸
Yes! Progressive updates is good for us to hear. Peter is speculative and at least knows that anything can change at any time so his assessment of the future will always be evolving.
Peter’s been wrong substantially especially with domestic politics. And he’s been wrong on Ukraine as well, the sanctions he along with every other state department member shouted from the hills that it would cripple the Russian economy… it didn’t. Juxtapose that with John Mearsheimer’s positions and well…Peter’s not the end all be all to say the least.
An interesting interview. Joe asked a lot of good questions, listened, and then asked more questions for clarification of points or to dig deeper before moving on to his next question. It sounds like work went into preparing the interview questions.. Peter Zeihan is very knowledgeable, big picture kind of guy and he tends to approach things with logical point of view..
He’s not predicting zeitgeist; he’s actually really bad at that stuff. He’s telling us what is possible based on economics, demographics, geography, and supply chains. He predicted Ukraine several years before it happened. He also predicted the demographic collapse.
About 3 weeks ago, Zeihan said in an interview with RNZ "Biden will win the election 100% in a landslide." He may be smart but his commonsense is way off sometimes.
This is also a year old... a lot has changed since then but more importantly news coverage is a bit more critical on even traditionally left leaning news sources.
It would be good if someone would match Zeihan's predictions to what has actually happened. I don't think his percentage would be very high. China is on the verge of economic collapse, but not for the reasons he predicted.
Peter never mentioned the declining and aging white population in the west rather just mentions the population decrease in China and also does not mention huge populations like Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Bangladesh.
Neither, have he said that 70% of the americans in age to join the army, are physically not eligible to do so, because of obesity and heart deseases rooted in poor nutrition habits and industrial food. In the oder hands russians are all athletic men and women, how come that "by 2050 Russia would not be able to survive" because of some kind of unknown "degradation" among the population?
Peter is proof that confidence, eloquence and arrogance get more listeners than accuracy and honesty. He is a sound bite journalist for people who don't want to think for themselves.
I'm only 5 minutes in and this just feels like propaganda. I'm not familiar with the guy so maybe that's unfair of me, but so far it just boils down to 'Russia bad!'
@@as3609you do not need a whole Podcast to arrive at that very true conclusion sadly. Russia is bad they are breaking their non agression treaties which puts them squarely in the bad and not to be trusted category. Now go ahead and make excuses...
This was back when Zeihan was still being non partisan or playing the I am a smart fact based liberal who hangs out with conservatives. Now he is a far left civ intel agent again.
I do not care how old this video is, this has to be the most comprehensive and expansive interview on geopolitics, energy and supply chain dynamics I have ever ingested - PLEASE Share ALLOT!
Except if you have watched the body of his work, you'd realize his overwhelming politic bias makes his information largely useless. He's not presenting objective research or analysis, he's writing narratives that suit that bias. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
@@Ekrindul I agree that there is bias in his analysis. However, the info on the devastation that Russia has inflected (death) on the Ukraine population is true. Also, the fact that Russia, whether it is with the Axis side in WWII or on their own, have always seen the need to kept Europe under their thumb is evidenced by history. If Ukraine "wins" - stops Russia; it will take them Generations to recover whereas Russian infrastructure, away from the their border with Europe, walks away relatively untouched if they lose. For better or worse, we need to support Ukraine as they, troops wise, alone are fighting to keep what I believe is European's largest crop land, free from Russia control.
@@Martian_Alien Ukraine will never recover. Their birth rate was already below sustainable levels before the war. All Russia has to do is flood Ukraine with Russian migrants and the country will inevitably be Russian. Ukraine already lost.
This guy talks a lot of bs. Absolute disinformation from Peter. I see this guy as a western tool to convince a population that they stand a chance against Russia
It's not the predictions' accuracy that are the problem, predictions of the future are hard no matter how knowledgeable you are. It's the certainty he makes them with.
Geopolitics is science. Review data, form hypothesis. Not always going to be right. He's gotten a lot of things right as well, though. So, in the world/work of Geopolitics, he's on par.
I was looking for something current and after 6 minutes I realized that this was old. It would be really nice if you put the original date in the title.
He's a moron. Dead wrong on China for years. Dead wrong on Russia for years. Not one thing right in his so-called 'analysis' 😅 of Ukraine war. Poor guy is in a mental prison of his own biases. He's a moron.
This guy says the same thing over and over for over a decade…and is hailed as some genius of geopolitics. Has China ended? Did it go away? They’ve been disappearing imminently according to Zeihan for years.
I’ve actually had a 180-degree turn on Peter Zeihan’s geopolitical analysis and with in the beginning of discussion he explains that he’s a generalist. He definitely knows the importance of free trade with in NAFTA and also solid understanding of what has gone on in Eastern Europe and that USA is definitely not an island needs trading partners. He definitely knows his global Agriculture Energy and Mining sectors. As an American he’s very well informed and I’m saying this as a compliment and my 180-degree turn.
Use thorium instead of uranium because there isn't plutonium as a byproduct. A long time ago the military insisted on Uranium instead of using thorium so it could use the plutonium for thermonuclear weapons. I believe that the modular nuclear power stations are exploring using thorium for this reason and it has a much shorter radioactive decay time frame than uranium 235.
It seems that if humanity were in such a dire state, and headed for a climate disaster on a global scale, it would be absolutely worth the effort to invest our future in atomic energy. There are a few viable options to move forward with atomic energy. The industry has come a very long way in improving multiple facets of its knowledge, safety, and experience. If for economic reasons alone, we should be planning widespread adoption of nuclear power plants. But with a runaway greenhouse on the line, I would expect the world to be developing the nuclear industry like it's our last hope!
I mean they’re doing a tax in Russia right now so I’d say they’re doing pretty good. Now Russia has to give China a bunch of land because they’re just not able really do anything about it.
@@entrenchgamer I mean he is only just estimating based on the knowledge he has at that moment. It's impossible to 100% tell the future because well it's the future.
I believe every word until the last ten minutes when he said bitcoin would go from $16k to negative. It’s currently over $100k. And to his point about it going up and up forever, no, USD is just going down in comparison.
@@charlesmcdonald1973 Good luck with THAT prognosis. If anything is heading to zero its most probably the US dollar. Go look up the BRICS mBridge project and their future use of a Gold backed blockchain digital currency for international settlement between members. 59 nations have said they want to join the BRICS. The US dollar as THE global reserve currency is heading for the toilet. Shame you probably didn't buy BTC years ago when it was a lot cheaper. Now it is out of many people's purchasing power and soon to get even more expensive.
IF China has this alleged age crisis, it can literally be fixed in 13-15 years, by increasing the child birth rate, by offering incentives to young people. China isn't going to collapse in a decade due to aging population...
I hate to break it to you, but the demographic data coming out of China (the official data, mind you) has actually gotten an order of magnitude worse in the year since this interview. The birthrate has declined since 2017 faster than what happened to the Jews of Europe during the Holocaust. As @Jacksaxby pointed out, fixing a declining birth rate is actually incredibly difficult. It requires allocating huge sums of money and space to families, and the policy of China is to do the opposite in order to maintain a controlled economy. Even if that was politically feasible (and it isn't), you'd then need to make sure their parents are taken care of so they can afford to have children without worrying about having to feed/take care of elderly relatives, something else that isn't happening. And you'd need to make sure that they have access to homes with enough rooms, enough spare spending money to feel they can afford a child, and on and on and on... and the worst part is that if you do every single one of those things, it STILL doesn't guarantee that the birth rate will improve at all. And of course there's the final issue; it's too late for children born today to help fix the population crisis. We've long passed the point of no return; that happened 20 years ago. The problem with demographics is that tomorrow's catastrophe can very well be today's boom... and that's exactly what a demographic dividend is. When China's economy was booming, nobody was thinking about how urbanization would drive the country to ruin in 40 years.
😂😂😂😂 incentives sure that will work. You showed that you are stupid. Incentives never work anywhere. Do you even read data? Or do you use your donkey brain
God why do old posts keep getting on UA-cam showing "7 days ago" etc. Very annoying. I had to watch 9 minutes of this (great interview) until it became clear that is at least 2 years old. Grrrrrrr
Channels are reposting everything to regenerate views and stats for the youtube algorythm. It isn't obvz but says Jan '23 in the desc at the very bottom.
Let’s talk a LITTLE about Ukraine corruption. More than half of their aid disappeared into someone’s pocket. He sounds like a Ukraine propagandist, not an analyst
@denniszakowicz8589 Its a damn hard one to solve now. Once both parties are stubborn and have their wants, and they hate each other, then peace is hard. Shouldve stopped this long ago, its like trying to stop ww2 or ww1 in the middle of it, its really hard. Russia annexed 4 regions already, Putin said those are non-negotiable, and Ukraine probably wants everything back.
@rrandor I agree. I watch a lot of Peter Zeihan and I think he has a good analysis on a lot of things. But his bias with the Ukraine-Russian conflict can be frustrating.
He just has read Russian and Soviet history and been to the place. I live 300 km from the war zone in Ukraine. Anyone who had lived through the Soviet regime knows what the Russians are doing, regardless of the propaganda they put out for the rest of the world
I've listened to Peter for years and one thing I can tell you is this guy is way too sure of himself. Presenting the future with certainty it's not possible for any human.
My god… Imagine seeing how much this guy got wrong and there are STILL people who proudly proclaim “I love his YT channel!”. It’s sad and scary at the same time.
"The Russian space is the worst farmland in the world." -- Right, the famous "Steppes of Central Asia". The world has greened over the last few decades, mostly in arid regions (like the steppe). Apparently an area the size of the continental United States is now green, that was not green before. How much of this is in Russia?
Wait… Joe really doesn’t understand that legalization of cocaine would increase the amount of people addicted to cocaine?!? I literally can’t understand how he could be that naive.
Does Zeihan believe Russia lost half a million troops in Afghanistan, both Chechen wars, Transnistria and Georgia? I'm no Russian apologist but this smacks of intentional misinformation. I don't hate Zeihan but experts should avoid speaking in absolute terms if they want to be taken seriously. I think John Mearsheimer is a little more pragmatic and even handed with his analysis(though not without his narrative bias).
He was completely wrong with his statement about the earth consistently warming since the late 1800s. It is not disputed in science that the surface of the earth was warmer during the Industrial Revolution than it is today. What has all of the climate scientists concerned is that the RATE of RECENT annual temperature increase (surface of the earth) is occurring at a faster pace than ever recorded. This guy Zeihan needs to stick with geopolitics and back off of the science, because he is not a scientist.
"In 1859, John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. By that he meant that carbon dioxide can absorb and hold heat. In 1896, Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish scientist claimed that burning coal, oil and natural gas releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and will eventually warm the planet." This is what he ment.
@@R3L4X97 - Burning ANYTHING releases carbon dioxide - it's not just "coal, oil and natural gas". Wood burning releases the same amounts of carbon dioxide as does petroleum compounds.
People laughed at me for rebuilding my sailboat to a live-aboard bugout survival pod that can stay out at sea self-sufficient for up to 10 years. They're not laughing anymore...
I absolutely love Peter Zeihan and the majority of his geopolitical views, with a few salient exceptions. One of these is his view on the war on drugs. That being said, I do appreciate how his views are all based on facts and figures that are largely available to the general public, rather than the largely boomer held views on controlling the actions of others. In fact, I believe this is one of his healthy skepticism(s) on big government.
Do you love him because what he says is consistent with what you believe? From what I've seen, he makes strawman arguments and distorts claims to further his message. He does not present different points of view. He is not interested in truth, he is interested in spreading his version of the truth. I think he's a good example of a very low quality information source. "Experts" like this are a dime a dozen on youtube, and everybody's got their favourite talking head. If you are interested in finding truthful information, I think you'd best look elsewhere.
@@rhwing5095 He is a geopolitical analyst. Analysts are in the business of predicting what will most likely occur given the information available. For example, he predicted Kiev would fall within 2 weeks, whilst I had predicted that it would take 2 months to fall. I based this on the types of units deployed to the border prior to the invasion and the fact that the Ukrainians were a democracy, where thinking outside the box is encouraged. Having been personally in a combat situation, I can personally attest to how critical the ability to think creatively is. But guess what happened? We were both wrong! And all factors considered, I have never been happier to be incorrect in my analysis! Regarding consistency in belief, I am a Libertarian, where as Peter describes himself as an independent, who will vote for whom ever has the "better" positions. Personally, I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans, but only if there is no Libertarian option. In one of his books, Peter has identified as a Libertarian of some sort. I believe that he said this to state that he is not "tribally" left or right. I think tribalism is dumb, outside of professional football of course. Go 'Niner's! And boo for the Raiders, KC, and any other team.
Remember a couple facts when it comes to Peter Zeihan, namely he has been saying "China has 10 years at most" since 1995, and from day 1 he has been saying "Ukraine is winning" despite the fact that multiple videos have come out showing they are grabbing old men and young boys off the street to throw them at the front and the average age in the Ukranian military is 53 because all the conscription age men that could escape fled to Poland.
At 1:49:37 Peter asks.. "What's Bitcoin now $16,000?" and right now Bitcoin is $62,053.25. And it hasn't been near $16,000.00 since 1/16/2022 so YEP... This is an old show!
I keep hearing about how Bitcoin is such a good investment, and clearly it has some value, but I've always seen it as being worthless, because it's not backed by anything except for people's belief that it has value. (The same could be said of any fiat currency.) I wonder if Ziehan has changed his tune, but people like Charlie Munger didn't have anything good to say about it either. I'm sure that it was started by criminals looking for a way to conduct business outside of the normal financial system.
@@jeffgkrehmer1095 fiat currencies can be great......if you don't have lefties buying votes.....NORWAY is an example.....start letting a trillion a year of our debt be paid
Putting the original air date in the video description would show basic respect to viewers.
Well there you go you have your answer. Joe don't care bout you.
Just scroll down.
@@MrUltraworld yeah that's where the description is.
the date is THERE ... just OPEN your eyes...
Released Jan 7, 2023
JRE probably posted it to show how right/wrong Pete is as hind sight is 20/20.
This is an old video from last year.
Yup, Russian losses are over 350,000 now
@@Apophis1010- that’s the losses from last year. We are now approaching 1M.
@@PelicansCourtsideClubI don’t think it was due to UA-cam censorship. He had an exclusivity contract with Spotify. That contract has come to an end and he can upload to other platforms.
@@Apophis1010 thats casualties man. 2/3 of those are probably already back on the front lines again.
oh yeah why they reposted it 🤔
Peter Zeihan is one of the best salesmen I've ever seen. He skims through a broad range of information, retains it, and then presents it with a cadence so perfect it exudes confidence. He gives the impression that his knowledge is as deep as the Mariana Trench, even if it’s sometimes more like a kiddie pool. I've met many good salesmen in the financial sector who are on par with his ability, but he's definitely one of the best. He's good enough to land the coveted after-lunch slot at government, banking, and finance conferences. I've been at a couple of useless conferences he's spoken at. He's fun, and usually keeps people from slipping out to take care of "important" things.
The problem is his theories are wrong his predictions consistently don't come true. He presents his argument well enough tho
Dude even sounds like Don Draper
@@frondreadz789 I'd be hard pressed to think of one that has come true. Yet he still get's booked. That's a salesman.
@@HaonProductions He's perfected his spiel to keep selling his spiel, even when he's wrong. It's amazing really.
@Edmund_Mallory_Hardgrove sure
Time for Joe to have Peter on again and blow his mind again.
YES!!
What porn category would that fall under?
Let’s get an epic podcast, then. I want to see a group cast with Vivek , Theo, Elon, Zach Whittaker, Tulsi, and Bill Maher. Musical Guest; In Living Color
@@michaeleversole9400sounds like a manic episode 😳🤭
Peter is clueless.
Peter is one of those guys who largely goes unchecked because he speaks well.
It always makes me skeptical when someone has a concise answer to everything, as if complex relationships can be boiled down to witty statemments and the future is a linear projection.
And you're one of those people who probably believes in Crypto Currency...
@@lfnt7069it’s been HiS Job His Entire Life.
When Your View of the world is the Screen In Your Hand. That is the Size of Your Playing Field.
PZ travels the World and is Engaged in it.
Unlike most People in Merica that Chant USA USA every touchdown Their team scores….
A limited view… Good Morning…..
Well,you have to be eloquent in order to deliver what you're trying to say especially to people that aren't as involved in geopolitics.
@@lfnt7069He doesn't have 5 hours to sit and give lectures about politics and geopolitics. If you're that invested just read books and follow news from sources that have been fact checked to a higher degree. Peter isn't linear at all. At all instances he gives multiple situations of what could happen. If you're not convinced then follow his channel and see for yourself.
Air on Spotify June 8, 2023
thought this was january 2023
@@theKaisersose101it was
Jan 6 2023
Before the 2023 offensive failed and before gaza war.
No. If you google Joe Rogan #1921 it's January 2023
Joe and his people really need to do a follow up interview here with Peter, i believe this episode is about a year old so another episode would line up perfectly. Revisit the talking points and aee where it all stands now. Peter might not be 100% correct on everything but people would be foolish not to listen and take note of what he says.
This guy talks a good game, but he is clearly spitballing.
Instead Joe is talking to straight up Nazi Propaganda Assets
@@sinesaiisometimes you are just riffing with the boys and next thing you know you are spitballing in India to a conference of business executives about how to take geo political advantage of Chinas imminent collapse
@@sinesaiiread his books bro he’s not spitballing lol
@@fcsomerta7680he’s a jerk off mate
Fantasy hour with Zeihan and his tales.
thank you for disproving any of the shit he’s claimed, c o p e
@Brockliy you can't disprove predictions about the future, dopey 😂
@@Jeromewhite123 you can show counter sources that go against what he’s predicting… holy fuck
Show his old predictions that are wrong then. He's been making predictions for a very long time now, he talked about the Russian invasion YEARS before it happened.
Ya, "Bitcoin now at 16K going to zero" That did not age well did it?
Thanks Joe,I never watch an episode without learning or swaying my opinions.I have enjoyed watching your transformation from new information that you received.Love ya bro!Just for transparency I’m a 65yr old white man from the hills of Tn.People like you give me hope for the future of my granddaughter.😎🇺🇸
We need an updated interview from this year.
i'd love an update how bitcoin will go negative
Get him on here again. I follow Peter on YT and he gives frequent updates on stuff but a new long forum talk would be great.
Yes!
Progressive updates is good for us to hear. Peter is speculative and at least knows that anything can change at any time so his assessment of the future will always be evolving.
@@Aussie-Mocha That’s certainly a way to say he’s almost always wrong
@@Inclimatic
Ok!
Being speculative does allow for margins of error.
There is no one that can predict the future with 100% accuracy. 50/50 at best
Why? Peter has routinely been wrong on just about every political take in the past 10 years. Lmao
Peter’s been wrong substantially especially with domestic politics. And he’s been wrong on Ukraine as well, the sanctions he along with every other state department member shouted from the hills that it would cripple the Russian economy… it didn’t. Juxtapose that with John Mearsheimer’s positions and well…Peter’s not the end all be all to say the least.
please add the time this was first aired to the description
12-18 months ago
no
this
You will address Jamie as Jamie!!!!! Duh.
The numbers gives context to time frame
Joe is about to get even richer now that he's airing old shows and new ones. The floodgates have opened
And, why not?
@@PsychHealth-wk9in suck it softly
At least we get a comment section now
It’s very frustrating thinking it’s new only to realize it’s old out of date and already listened too often.
@@Birdsaregovspys6969 at least we have a comment section now
He is quite an Expert whose almost all predictions about anything fall short.
If not one of the best guests who is completely unknown but became a household name over night.
This dude got Ukraine so wrong. He was so confident of his views.
and biden
Yes and he did admit that. He's not ever once said this will go the way I say.
Ukraine is still ongoing? What was he wrong about?
@ that it would be over very quickly and russia would get smashed.
Where? Come on, say for yourself
Take a drink everytime joe's mind is blown
no doubt
Joe "Jesus F**ing Christ!" Rogan
@@immortaljanus - don't do it with alcohol - no one could survive that much.
I laughed so hard the 30th time Joe said "Jesus!", that I had to make a comment. I see you guys beat me to it!
Joes Guest have been Meh as far as interesting…
They should put a date in the title of these old videos. I get they have the number but it’s not obvious to everyone that it’s old.
The only way you can kinda tell if it’s old is if Joe looks more normal
@@phettywappharmaceuticalsll8842 he doesn’t look normal now? 😂
I'm so glad Joe dropped the exclusive with Spotify, full podcasts not being on UA-cam was a void
An interesting interview. Joe asked a lot of good questions, listened, and then asked more questions for clarification of points or to dig deeper before moving on to his next question. It sounds like work went into preparing the interview questions.. Peter Zeihan is very knowledgeable, big picture kind of guy and he tends to approach things with logical point of view..
😂😂
Zeihan talking confidently about 25 years into the future... Imagine anyone in 1999 could EVER have predicted the zeitgeist of 2024?
@@ozgurkibar9778 Alex Jones
Terence McKenna kinda did
@@ozgurkibar9778 Bill Cooper
Well certain things are inevitable even at that timescale. Demographics for one. Resources and industrial capacities usually are as well.
He’s not predicting zeitgeist; he’s actually really bad at that stuff. He’s telling us what is possible based on economics, demographics, geography, and supply chains. He predicted Ukraine several years before it happened. He also predicted the demographic collapse.
Stratfor has deep CIA ties. Take this with a grain of salt.
Master bullshitter
About 3 weeks ago, Zeihan said in an interview with RNZ "Biden will win the election 100% in a landslide."
He may be smart but his commonsense is way off sometimes.
To be fair this was before God emperor Trump survived a assassination atempt
No one is always right... except me.
@@aarondetinne8128 Sure, but he said landslide which is nuts.
This is also a year old... a lot has changed since then but more importantly news coverage is a bit more critical on even traditionally left leaning news sources.
@@aarondetinne8128 He made the statement on RNZ about a month ago.
is there a date for this podcast?
He gets everything wrong with such confidence.
It would be good if someone would match Zeihan's predictions to what has actually happened. I don't think his percentage would be very high. China is on the verge of economic collapse, but not for the reasons he predicted.
Or… China will probably not collapse at all.
Honestly, go to China. Everything you have been told is probably untrue or heavily exaggerated.
Ask him about the USS Liberty!
Peter never mentioned the declining and aging white population in the west rather just mentions the population decrease in China and also does not mention huge populations like Indonesia, Pakistan, Nigeria, and Bangladesh.
Neither, have he said that 70% of the americans in age to join the army, are physically not eligible to do so, because of obesity and heart deseases rooted in poor nutrition habits and industrial food. In the oder hands russians are all athletic men and women, how come that "by 2050 Russia would not be able to survive" because of some kind of unknown "degradation" among the population?
LOVED this episode. Peter is the only person that I listen to ALL of his audio content he puts out. Everything he says is always interesting.
You listen to the quack for information, don't be stupid, everything he say turn out to be bullshit. But he does tell a good story.
lol you listen because hes usually wrong about everything 😂
Peter is proof that confidence, eloquence and arrogance get more listeners than accuracy and honesty. He is a sound bite journalist for people who don't want to think for themselves.
You should marry him then
HE KNOWS NOTHING
This dudes been proven wrong over and over
I'm only 5 minutes in and this just feels like propaganda. I'm not familiar with the guy so maybe that's unfair of me, but so far it just boils down to 'Russia bad!'
@@as3609you do not need a whole Podcast to arrive at that very true conclusion sadly. Russia is bad they are breaking their non agression treaties which puts them squarely in the bad and not to be trusted category. Now go ahead and make excuses...
Are you saying putin and his actions are good? Lmao
Peter making the WEF proud
Did Daddy Putin pat you on the head for coming up with that, Ivan?
@@junkscience6397 You live on a this or that paradigm bud. i support neither.
@manicsurfing oh is he pro wef I didnt know that I missed it.
So how did it go Peter?
What are you even referring to?
His shitty takes.
oldies but goldies
This was back when Zeihan was still being non partisan or playing the I am a smart fact based liberal who hangs out with conservatives. Now he is a far left civ intel agent again.
hes a liar
@@user-ww8nz5oo2lBases on what?
1 Rogan interview is enuff for Pete
I do not care how old this video is, this has to be the most comprehensive and expansive interview on geopolitics, energy and supply chain dynamics I have ever ingested - PLEASE Share ALLOT!
Except if you have watched the body of his work, you'd realize his overwhelming politic bias makes his information largely useless. He's not presenting objective research or analysis, he's writing narratives that suit that bias. Once you see it, you can't unsee it.
@@Ekrindul I agree that there is bias in his analysis. However, the info on the devastation that Russia has inflected (death) on the Ukraine population is true. Also, the fact that Russia, whether it is with the Axis side in WWII or on their own, have always seen the need to kept Europe under their thumb is evidenced by history. If Ukraine "wins" - stops Russia; it will take them Generations to recover whereas Russian infrastructure, away from the their border with Europe, walks away relatively untouched if they lose. For better or worse, we need to support Ukraine as they, troops wise, alone are fighting to keep what I believe is European's largest crop land, free from Russia control.
@@Martian_Alien Ukraine will never recover. Their birth rate was already below sustainable levels before the war. All Russia has to do is flood Ukraine with Russian migrants and the country will inevitably be Russian. Ukraine already lost.
john Mearsheimer and him debating would be awesome
Mearsheimer is a putin stooge... he should head to moscow and stay there
I was thinking exactly the same thing, how funny.
Both are the type of professional caliber think tank stuff would be a fabulous debate
It would be like a Dentist and a circus clown plying their trades.
Finally Peter isn’t on a hike
China possibly has been misreporting its population for years… it is not 1.5 billion but closer to 850 million.
I believe you but how did you find out
@@youtuber6185 Lei's real talk community discussion
CCP literally revised their numbers down multiple times by hundred million plus.
Already watched. Also, not saying that this guy is wrong but first thing he says is "Russia has the worst farmland in the world", which says alot.
It says a lot when you misunderstand a country’s size and farmland with its ability to transport and store, as well as trade, it’s agriculture.
I love Joe Rogan's "hoooo"
Is this an old video reuploaded? All the information about Russia/Ukraine at the beginning is very...off?
Peter Z was wrong before. About Brazil agriculture collapse that didn’t happen, about Taiwan, too, about Bitcoin collapsing from 17k to zero, etc ….
It has been 18 months - would be AMAZING for JRE to revisit with Perer on this
Especially now after Ukraine has invaded Kursk region and Russia did not retaliate with a nuclear strike.
especially now since they have taken the fight to russia proper
His prediction for the Ukraine counter offensive is a classic, in utter failure to understand war.
This guy talks a lot of bs. Absolute disinformation from Peter. I see this guy as a western tool to convince a population that they stand a chance against Russia
Everyone was wrong about this and he's admitted to being wrong.
@@justinwoodall461 where.
@@user-ww8nz5oo2l he does weekly sometimes daily podcasts and has admitted several times to being wrong about Ukraine.
Miserably failed, this guy seems,knowlegable, only this.
It's not the predictions' accuracy that are the problem, predictions of the future are hard no matter how knowledgeable you are. It's the certainty he makes them with.
Stephen is probably the most reliable person who has a good grast on world issues
so now in 2024 we see all his predictions where just...... WRONG
Always the case. But he is such a good orator....
@@wienerchronist9860he isn’t great. The intonations and dramatic pauses were very theatrical. Meh
Geopolitics is science. Review data, form hypothesis. Not always going to be right.
He's gotten a lot of things right as well, though.
So, in the world/work of Geopolitics, he's on par.
Actually he was spot on with everything
I’m here just to hate watch
10:45 well this aged nicely
Maybe have Scott Ridder on , He may have a differnt analisis
They will shut down rogans shows.
I was looking for something current and after 6 minutes I realized that this was old. It would be really nice if you put the original date in the title.
the orig release date of jan 2023 is actually in the desc at the very very bottom. not obvious.
bahaha "how do you sleep at night?" best question
You should have Peter on more often. Breath of fresh air. Thank you.
He's a moron. Dead wrong on China for years. Dead wrong on Russia for years. Not one thing right in his so-called 'analysis' 😅 of Ukraine war.
Poor guy is in a mental prison of his own biases. He's a moron.
Peter does video releases on patreon and has a youtube channel he releases the same videos about a week later
I want him to come back on the show SO MUCH. Joe get to work on that please!
So you can listen to more lies??? He been wrong about everything he said.
@@2amNerd no. He's a lying hack
@@user-ww8nz5oo2lnaw your a hack.
@@justinwoodall461 naw you're an urbanite and uneducated. You think you're smart though. Confidence and ignorance is a bad combo
should be 2 hours longer
People like you shouldn't get to breathe. Your ignorance is stupendous
@@seasideshutterworx no
@@user-ww8nz5oo2l ok sorry
@@user-ww8nz5oo2l ok sorry
"Here from the Chris Williamson video" ⬇️button
This guy says the same thing over and over for over a decade…and is hailed as some genius of geopolitics. Has China ended? Did it go away? They’ve been disappearing imminently according to Zeihan for years.
I’ve actually had a 180-degree turn on Peter Zeihan’s geopolitical analysis and with in the beginning of discussion he explains that he’s a generalist. He definitely knows the importance of free trade with in NAFTA and also solid understanding of what has gone on in Eastern Europe and that USA is definitely not an island needs trading partners. He definitely knows his global Agriculture Energy and Mining sectors. As an American he’s very well informed and I’m saying this as a compliment and my 180-degree turn.
peter is a dingdong. i cant wait to do a reaction on this one. specifically on crypto and economics
You should have him on again instead of Mike Baker every 2 weeks
Feel like most people misunderstand him because he talks well. He isn't saying facts, he's projecting possibilities based on geopolitical facts.
Must add “aired date”
Use thorium instead of uranium because there isn't plutonium as a byproduct. A long time ago the military insisted on Uranium instead of using thorium so it could use the plutonium for thermonuclear weapons. I believe that the modular nuclear power stations are exploring using thorium for this reason and it has a much shorter radioactive decay time frame than uranium 235.
It seems that if humanity were in such a dire state, and headed for a climate disaster on a global scale, it would be absolutely worth the effort to invest our future in atomic energy. There are a few viable options to move forward with atomic energy. The industry has come a very long way in improving multiple facets of its knowledge, safety, and experience. If for economic reasons alone, we should be planning widespread adoption of nuclear power plants. But with a runaway greenhouse on the line, I would expect the world to be developing the nuclear industry like it's our last hope!
I can't think of another pundit that gets things wrong more than this guy
There is this bald guy on CNBC. Kramer? You can literally bet your life saving against him!
He sure doesn't know crap about crypto! Haha
@@LibertyJusticeforALL-ii3nm BTC over 90k today, but will it survive the bear market and the war with Russia??!?!! WHO THE FUCK KNOWS!?!? XD
So… he said in a year Ukraine would be in charge of the war.
How’s that looking?
He has consistently been shown to be incorrect on numerous occasions, leading to a significant erosion of his critical credibility in my estimation.
I mean they’re doing a tax in Russia right now so I’d say they’re doing pretty good. Now Russia has to give China a bunch of land because they’re just not able really do anything about it.
Regrettably, I am unable to comprehend the content of your response, my apologies.
@@entrenchgamer I mean he is only just estimating based on the knowledge he has at that moment. It's impossible to 100% tell the future because well it's the future.
@@entrenchgamerwow you should've known this awhile ago
Lefty's never learn. You'll never admit you supported him with enthusiasm
I believe every word until the last ten minutes when he said bitcoin would go from $16k to negative. It’s currently over $100k. And to his point about it going up and up forever, no, USD is just going down in comparison.
Get this guy back every 6 months updating and going over what he said the last episode to see if he is correct
This is the guy who thinks bitcoin is going to zero lmao
It still could. It the cash money backing it disappears. Nobody STILL knows who has it. 😂
@@charlesmcdonald1973 Good luck with THAT prognosis. If anything is heading to zero its most probably the US dollar. Go look up the BRICS mBridge project and their future use of a Gold backed blockchain digital currency for international settlement between members. 59 nations have said they want to join the BRICS. The US dollar as THE global reserve currency is heading for the toilet. Shame you probably didn't buy BTC years ago when it was a lot cheaper. Now it is out of many people's purchasing power and soon to get even more expensive.
Looks like it is
Bitcoin relies on web connection to the world does it not? That can go offline VERY easy.
I'd do some googling about Bitcoin before making incorrect comments about it
IF China has this alleged age crisis, it can literally be fixed in 13-15 years, by increasing the child birth rate, by offering incentives to young people. China isn't going to collapse in a decade due to aging population...
I hate to break it to you, but the demographic data coming out of China (the official data, mind you) has actually gotten an order of magnitude worse in the year since this interview. The birthrate has declined since 2017 faster than what happened to the Jews of Europe during the Holocaust.
As @Jacksaxby pointed out, fixing a declining birth rate is actually incredibly difficult. It requires allocating huge sums of money and space to families, and the policy of China is to do the opposite in order to maintain a controlled economy. Even if that was politically feasible (and it isn't), you'd then need to make sure their parents are taken care of so they can afford to have children without worrying about having to feed/take care of elderly relatives, something else that isn't happening. And you'd need to make sure that they have access to homes with enough rooms, enough spare spending money to feel they can afford a child, and on and on and on... and the worst part is that if you do every single one of those things, it STILL doesn't guarantee that the birth rate will improve at all.
And of course there's the final issue; it's too late for children born today to help fix the population crisis. We've long passed the point of no return; that happened 20 years ago. The problem with demographics is that tomorrow's catastrophe can very well be today's boom... and that's exactly what a demographic dividend is. When China's economy was booming, nobody was thinking about how urbanization would drive the country to ruin in 40 years.
😂😂😂😂 incentives sure that will work. You showed that you are stupid. Incentives never work anywhere. Do you even read data? Or do you use your donkey brain
God why do old posts keep getting on UA-cam showing "7 days ago" etc. Very annoying. I had to watch 9 minutes of this (great interview) until it became clear that is at least 2 years old. Grrrrrrr
Channels are reposting everything to regenerate views and stats for the youtube algorythm. It isn't obvz but says Jan '23 in the desc at the very bottom.
Lets all get sober, quite drinking and smoking and drugs.
Unfortunately old stuff, but still useful to watch again.
Putin has removed Shoygu since this talk
our propaganda goes both ways. it placates us and tells Putin who to kill. It's like saving the CIA a lot of effort.
Let’s talk a LITTLE about Ukraine corruption. More than half of their aid disappeared into someone’s pocket. He sounds like a Ukraine propagandist, not an analyst
@denniszakowicz8589 Its a damn hard one to solve now. Once both parties are stubborn and have their wants, and they hate each other, then peace is hard. Shouldve stopped this long ago, its like trying to stop ww2 or ww1 in the middle of it, its really hard. Russia annexed 4 regions already, Putin said those are non-negotiable, and Ukraine probably wants everything back.
Let's talk about Hunter Biden and Ukraine... no conflict of interest?
@rrandor I agree. I watch a lot of Peter Zeihan and I think he has a good analysis on a lot of things. But his bias with the Ukraine-Russian conflict can be frustrating.
@denniszakowicz8589 I left an answer that got deleted for some reason. I will shorten it. Negotiate for peace. Stop paying for corruption.
You got paid in rubles to post that.
China imports 14 million barrels of oil a DAY. Wow.
One of your best, Joe !!! 👍🤔 ( Greetings from London, UK )
Jack Carr ‘only the dead’ brought me here
Wow... did they told Peter that the whole talk would be forever on the internet? He'd got a world record of wrong predictions. Kinda funny... 😄
He should make a new video updating us on the current situation and how his predictions have played out. It seems like he’s already hit a few of them.
He makes lots of new videos updating his views….daily in fact, look up his you tube page.
The best interview i've seen in the show, excellent!!!
I've been listening to Peter for a While Now, and he has allot of material out, hours and hours worth....
How do we go back to the column?
Joe: we all grew up in this 1946-now bubble; that is NOT how the preceding 10k years went. This truly was a "golden era," and it's about to end.
This guy sounds like I entered "spam me like russophobic encyclopedia of bulls*#$" as a gpt prompt
100%
yet another ruZZian bot
He just has read Russian and Soviet history and been to the place. I live 300 km from the war zone in Ukraine. Anyone who had lived through the Soviet regime knows what the Russians are doing, regardless of the propaganda they put out for the rest of the world
I've listened to Peter for years and one thing I can tell you is this guy is way too sure of himself. Presenting the future with certainty it's not possible for any human.
It's strategic commentary. No tactical.
@@antoncarmoducchi6057 he is defo wrong about alot of stuff
My god… Imagine seeing how much this guy got wrong and there are STILL people who proudly proclaim “I love his YT channel!”. It’s sad and scary at the same time.
Once I heard his views on crypto I was like well this guy's an idiot!
"The Russian space is the worst farmland in the world." -- Right, the famous "Steppes of Central Asia".
The world has greened over the last few decades, mostly in arid regions (like the steppe). Apparently an area the size of the continental United States is now green, that was not green before. How much of this is in Russia?
Ah... the world's top virologist expert Joe Rogan
Peter's channel is one of my favorites on UA-cam. Please have him on again.
I didn't bother watching I have heard enough of Zeihan he is very wrong 80% of the time
I've never seen anyone that seems to know so much about so much..
The key word is “seems.”
If you guys look at the # of the podcast you can het a general idea of when it came out....
The Sun is nuclear energy. Concentrate nuclear waste and send the waste to the Sun.
Wait… Joe really doesn’t understand that legalization of cocaine would increase the amount of people addicted to cocaine?!?
I literally can’t understand how he could be that naive.
he's just playing into the GTA Online parody ads on the radio. That or he doesn't know it's a GTA Online parody.
Does Zeihan believe Russia lost half a million troops in Afghanistan, both Chechen wars, Transnistria and Georgia? I'm no Russian apologist but this smacks of intentional misinformation. I don't hate Zeihan but experts should avoid speaking in absolute terms if they want to be taken seriously. I think John Mearsheimer is a little more pragmatic and even handed with his analysis(though not without his narrative bias).
The science of climate change was settled in the 1890's? really? He had me until that point.
He was completely wrong with his statement about the earth consistently warming since the late 1800s. It is not disputed in science that the surface of the earth was warmer during the Industrial Revolution than it is today. What has all of the climate scientists concerned is that the RATE of RECENT annual temperature increase (surface of the earth) is occurring at a faster pace than ever recorded. This guy Zeihan needs to stick with geopolitics and back off of the science, because he is not a scientist.
"In 1859, John Tyndall discovered that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas. By that he meant that carbon dioxide can absorb and hold heat. In 1896, Svante Arrhenius, a Swedish scientist claimed that burning coal, oil and natural gas releases carbon dioxide into the atmosphere and will eventually warm the planet."
This is what he ment.
@@R3L4X97 -
Burning ANYTHING releases carbon dioxide - it's not just "coal, oil and natural gas". Wood burning releases the same amounts of carbon dioxide as does petroleum compounds.
I so love listening to Peter. Informative and down to earth. Thanks for posting this!,❤❤
People laughed at me for rebuilding my sailboat to a live-aboard bugout survival pod that can stay out at sea self-sufficient for up to 10 years. They're not laughing anymore...
NO, CRAZY PEOPLE ARE WAY LESS ENTERTAINING THAN WE MIGHT SUPPOSE.
I absolutely love Peter Zeihan and the majority of his geopolitical views, with a few salient exceptions. One of these is his view on the war on drugs. That being said, I do appreciate how his views are all based on facts and figures that are largely available to the general public, rather than the largely boomer held views on controlling the actions of others. In fact, I believe this is one of his healthy skepticism(s) on big government.
Do you love him because what he says is consistent with what you believe? From what I've seen, he makes strawman arguments and distorts claims to further his message. He does not present different points of view. He is not interested in truth, he is interested in spreading his version of the truth. I think he's a good example of a very low quality information source. "Experts" like this are a dime a dozen on youtube, and everybody's got their favourite talking head. If you are interested in finding truthful information, I think you'd best look elsewhere.
@@rhwing5095 He is a geopolitical analyst. Analysts are in the business of predicting what will most likely occur given the information available. For example, he predicted Kiev would fall within 2 weeks, whilst I had predicted that it would take 2 months to fall. I based this on the types of units deployed to the border prior to the invasion and the fact that the Ukrainians were a democracy, where thinking outside the box is encouraged. Having been personally in a combat situation, I can personally attest to how critical the ability to think creatively is.
But guess what happened? We were both wrong! And all factors considered, I have never been happier to be incorrect in my analysis!
Regarding consistency in belief, I am a Libertarian, where as Peter describes himself as an independent, who will vote for whom ever has the "better" positions. Personally, I have voted for both Democrats and Republicans, but only if there is no Libertarian option.
In one of his books, Peter has identified as a Libertarian of some sort. I believe that he said this to state that he is not "tribally" left or right. I think tribalism is dumb, outside of professional football of course. Go 'Niner's! And boo for the Raiders, KC, and any other team.
Remember a couple facts when it comes to Peter Zeihan, namely he has been saying "China has 10 years at most" since 1995, and from day 1 he has been saying "Ukraine is winning" despite the fact that multiple videos have come out showing they are grabbing old men and young boys off the street to throw them at the front and the average age in the Ukranian military is 53 because all the conscription age men that could escape fled to Poland.
At 1:49:37 Peter asks.. "What's Bitcoin now $16,000?" and right now Bitcoin is $62,053.25. And it hasn't been near $16,000.00 since 1/16/2022 so YEP... This is an old show!
I keep hearing about how Bitcoin is such a good investment, and clearly it has some value, but I've always seen it as being worthless, because it's not backed by anything except for people's belief that it has value. (The same could be said of any fiat currency.) I wonder if Ziehan has changed his tune, but people like Charlie Munger didn't have anything good to say about it either. I'm sure that it was started by criminals looking for a way to conduct business outside of the normal financial system.
@@jeffgkrehmer1095 fiat currencies can be great......if you don't have lefties buying votes.....NORWAY is an example.....start letting a trillion a year of our debt be paid
Jan 2023
@@jeffgkrehmer1095Bwahahaha, you should do some research!
This interview is much older than six months ago !
I like the idea of putting windmills on top of mountains.. Gotta have a tower high enough not to kill the birds