Animated Atrocities 083 || "YouTube Copyright School"
Вставка
- Опубліковано 15 бер 2015
- Patreon: / mrenter
Link tree: linktr.ee/mrenterofficial
Find (almost) all of my videos here: docs.google.com/spreadsheets/...
So, UA-cam... does this video count? - Фільми й анімація
![Animated Atrocities 093 || "The Pom-Pom Girl" [My Life Me]](/img/n.gif)
Ironic that a video about copyright infringement is using sound effects ripped straight from a mario game.
yeah, fuck you toob
they might be quietly stabbing you tube in the back
oh god... Derek savage!
+Jackson Whitlow, says the one that can't even form a coherent statement.
+Jackson Whitlow I don't think you understand how copyright infringement works.
The irony is that this will probably get taken down for copyright
Brandon Roberts Can't it be both?
In all seriousness, UA-cam is definitely asinine at times.
That was LITERALLY what I was just thinking.
Well then, everyone start downloading this video and upload it on someone else's channel.
Ten dollars it happens by tomorrow.
Crazy Luigi
UA-cam is owned by Google, so I'd say Google has some problems.
UA-cam is so messed up nowadays that, soon enough, you'll get sued for watching a video.
ikr
+Amienee84 You'll get sued for reacting. ;)
+Amienee84 HOW DARE YOU WATCH THIS VIDEO!!!! you'll be hearing from our lawers!!!
-youtube
+Amienee84 No way that could happen that would be shooting them self in the head how else would they get blackmail money I mean add revenuer.
+Porter? You're pretty spot on about that.
2:07 HEY UA-cam YOU USED MY LOGO WITHOUT MY PERMISSION, BRING ON THE PAIN, I WILL SUE YOU IN COURT!!!
youtube! how dare you! tube!
Copyrighted Honestly, that would be cathardic.
😂😂😂
Copyrighted
LMFAO
This Copyright School video was the most cringeworthy and fundamentally disgusting I literally reported it for supporting terrorism.
***** I said that the video is so anger inducing and disgusting that it could potentially incite people to commit acts of terror.
+Locke Silvrel Hey, its about as legit as most other claims made against other youtubers.
lol
+KingLink95 Seriously!?
NestieBots-Sama Lord of the ULTRA Empire Yep. UA-cam could be on a terrorist watch list right now for all we know. lol.
I...Hate...UA-cam Copyright school with a burning passions!!!
They literally treat the user like a child and they don't care to even check these claim on your videos. You are essentially guilty until proven innocent. UA-cam doesn't even explain how you can fight claims on your videos or ways you can get your channel back. Oh and fair use? Yea that doesn't exist on youtube. You can claim a video under fair use but that doesn't get rid of the issue of them flagging more of your videos or flagging he same video again or for other reasons.
The video follows the mindset of guilty until we decide otherwise. It treats the user like a child as you mentioned. And it's a poor use of Happy Tree Friends. I say that's three strikes right there
Yeah! That video will make someone comitted suicide
To be fair a lot of their fan base consists of edgy kids.
What ticks me off here is that it says near the end it's fine to create your own original content but you can't use any copyrighted material even in your own way or you'll get strikes and a possible ban.
By that logic, people can't upload song remixes, reviews to get a new game publicity and do covers of any song. In short terms, things that could get something popular and possible new customers to purchase that item.
***** Where did he say that and is McCarthyism somehow related to Meghan McCarthy in a way?
The actual video has comments disabled. I wonder why.
Hrd 2 H1t ya I know
Ikr
They probably don't want people to point out the things that they missed. The things that they missed that people think they can do, which is leading to a new high of copyright strikes. Honestly, if UA-cam is going to make us watch this, they should at least cover as much as they can. Not saying it has to be over 10 minutes, just that it should cover most, if not all the ways you can get in copyright infringement, how you can avoid it, and what ACTUALLY makes UA-cam interesting: fair use.
And yet it's one of the videos that has more dislikes than likes.
Ben Logterman I clicked on that video just to dislike.
Get it? Russel is a PIRATE!!!! And pirates steal video content!
+Jake Sante Well...that's kinda clever, I'll give them that.
+D MAS I didn't think it was particularly clever. Of course I haven't seen the original show, so idk.
D MAS Watching a video like this could do that to anyone.
101jir For me, it wasn't just once. Shits all over the place nowadays.
D MAS I wouldn't say "nowadays." MrEnter stated that he will eventually get into more of the 70s cartoons, which by almost any standard today were terrible. Many of them anyway.
Eventually, people will be sued for their own videos.
+Kiki The Fox Eventually? Didn't he already say that happens?
Really stupid huh.
+Kiki The Fox PLEASE KEEP YOUR MOUTH SHUT! WE DON'T WANT TO GIVE THEM ANY IDEAS!
in the year 2020 youtube will sue you for logging in your account
+Kiki The Fox
its already happening thou
Yes. Doing something dangerous, like juggling piranhas in a cannon is perfectly fine, but putting pictures over a song? Unacceptable!
Stephen Brown yep
no you idiotic dumbf**k. the point here is to make original content.
Good point!
That means that the video used in a cartoon as an example of original content would get unmonetised on real UA-cam in a second!
Thats because if you juggle a piranha its still YOUR content IF its you who is on the video
If its not you on the video just make sure the person is okay to be filmed
Granted if one manage to successfully juggle piranhas, that video would be a huge hit. Then again a failure and the resulting injury would have been even more successful.
How youtube copyright works:
if you make a video, and a company doesn't like, you've infringed copyright.
Good job.
oligarchy is amazing
Or if a troll or cyberbully flagged it.
HTF Is the most disturbing show I've ever seen, AND IT'S IN THE KID'S SECTION ON NETLIX. O__O
Well kids I know watch south park all the time so I don't have a problem with it.
Josephthemaster145 Actually you're right XD
+llamajam5 i think that htf is a show that only kids really can enjoy
as an adult you watch one episode and you watched them all pretty much
i loved it as a kid but as an adult its boring as hell
i dont get how this became as big as it was back then but whatevs
it's a ripoff, or the non gory version
+llamajam5 You know, for kids!
Something that grinds my gears:
UA-cam doesn't allow you to make content of dangerous acts, and at the final scene of the video, *RUSSEL LITERALLY DOES A DANFEROUS ACT.*
"Rules for thee, not for me." The people making the rules often think the rules don't apply to them.
Someone should claim copyright infringement on the UA-cam Copyright School. Maybe then they'll wake up and go "Oh shit, this system is actually broken..."
this both sounds really really dumb and really really smart at the same time.
One day a large provider will have their video taken down by youtube's automatic copyright bot, or have it monetized by youtube or another company without permission. Most likely mistaking this poster for a small time account or not knowing of the poster's company, they will ignore the counter-claim like they usually do and get sued.
Yeah! UA-cam must learn about their system
Aldo Meylano youtube knows about their system, enough reviewers have made compliant videos on it like angry joe and someordinarygamers to name two. the people in charge just dont care
I could blame Jawed for this
I believe that copyright holders should also have to follow a three-strike system. If a copyright holder makes three false claims, then they lose their ability to claim videos.
I think their strikes should be reviewed before its effect is applied
Matthew Vitelli That would actually be a good idea, but UA-cam isn't gonna do anything, because they have dumb rules.
WHY IS THAT NOT A RULE ALREADY?
Because UA-cam is giving the copyright claim button open for liars to push. And YOU, the one who was mistakenly accused for copyright infringement, have to actually type a counter-notification. And then it takes like, what, 3 weeks to get your video back? This rule should already be in effect. Sadly, it isn't.
Not saying that you, Matthew Vitelli, were actually accused of copyright infringement. Just a "what if" statement.
My friend, you are a genius.
It's so wierd to watch Happy Tree Friends and noone get's physically hurt.
Ikr
The pirate got injured in the end
the world's most awesome variety channel he probably means killed
@@kloverleavezisdeadlol the only possible violence in this video happened off-screen. The UA-cam copyright school is using characters from the show that's notoriously violent, and doesn't just have implied violence. It's why I don't think the creators of that show actually created the mess.
@@varietyhub2948 ye
its shit like this that makes me worry about uploading anything
I don't blame ya.
As was mentioned in the video, anyone can claim to own the rights to your video despite not owning it. They don't need to show proof either. In fact, Goolge took Viacom to court for many years because they were doing exactly that. I think they settled the case, but nothing has been fixed obviously.
The Yu-Gi-Oh Brony Uploading a video which is someone elses on UA-cam might not be a big deal; WHAT YOU CANNOT DO IS SELL THEIR PRODUCT!
The Yu-Gi-Oh Brony This video should be taken down because IT'S NOT ACCURATE WITH TODAY'S STANDARDS!!!!
The Yu-Gi-Oh Brony Or you are just to lazy to put any work into uploading anything.
I think it would be hilarious if some huge company filed bogus DMCA claims on UA-cam's own videos. Imagine, "UA-cam Copyright School is no longer available due to a copyright claim by Viacom."
Dr Shaym that wood be so funny...
What does DMCA stand for? I don't want to sound dumb, but I've seen and heard that term for quite some time now and I don't know what DMCA means.
Victor Hernandez Digital Millennium Copyright Act.
This comment is so lonely yet how popular he is.
Whoever makes this happen will be forgiven by god, both political parties and their parents.
Wow... This just happened to IHE.... #FREEIHE
And the IHE Derek Savage fight
+BILLJACKten My Mistake. Sorry.
+Zayvorian Harris and jacknjellify (if you don't know jnj were the kids behind bfdi)
They got it back according to their twitter.
What's up h
This is EASILY one of THE greatest videos that has ever been uploaded on the internet. Period. The truth is too strong in this one. It deserves 5 million views.
Nigga ARE YOU EVERYWHERE
Son Goku U R TOO cuz you be seeing me everywhere :p
aachelabelaaron Yup!
+mrm64 And may I ask why?
Gillian Gauss Beeecause of the content?
Did you know: UA-cam didn't even credit the creators of Happy Tree Friends for the animation or Mondo Media, their production company, which makes UA-cam hypocritical for breaking their own rules.
Ikr
I can't wait until pornstars talk to us about Community Guidelines
WorldSuperMedia 750 I also can't wait for Spongebob to tell us about drinking.
I'll be communitying my guideline all day long.
I'm waiting for Pickle and Peanut to talk about depression
Cletus the rapping shark talks about eating healthy
WorldSuperMedia 750 I guess UA-cam needs to find a way to contact Alexis Texas or Mia Khalifa then.
though it is a little funny that they chose russell the pirate for this short. since Pirating can lead to copyright infringement.
Imo, it's about as funny as someone stepping on a lego.
as long as you aren't the one stepping on it and you watch it happen to someone else it is little funny
cjwalkerist luke
True.
if you infringe UA-cam copyright, you'll be banned for life.
Mr. Enter says he was "banned for life" but was able to come back anyway.
there's only one logical explanation for this: *Mr. Enter is undead.*
+Robbie Norris ...or he made another account.
GameCheater803 ... Yeah, I guess it was a pretty shit joke...
Ryan Kruleski oh shit, yeah!
Zombie Mr. Enter theory still stands.
... No it doesn't...
* in my best Rainbow Dash voice *
DUN DUN DUN!!
* eagle screech *
+Robbie Norris That or he has godly powers.
It's insulting that UA-cam uses someone else creation and a guy talking to viewers like they're underage children about an out of date issue. Also, UA-cam and Google shouldn't have a machine do copyright matching for them. It should be the decision of the original creator if they want to file a claim against a user.
even more insulting when google (still?) pirates and uploads pics and links from billions of other pics and vids from other sites.
search engine or not it still does it for free without a dime going to any of the owner, mainly people who would not like their stuff to appear in a google images area.
It will scarred the youtubers who had terminated for life or worse
Aldo Meylano
"it will scarred"? wtf.. does.. that... even MEAN!?! -slaps with a dictionary-
I mean. It would make someone lost in faith with humanity
Aldo Meylano no not a matter if you mean it or not, the first part of your sentence makes NO SENSE. please fix it so we can better understand you.
"A good artist creates, a great artist steals." And no, I don't know who first said it.
Copyright does not but harm creativity and innovation. It's greedy at best, elitist at worst. At best, it's saying we can't improve upon technology or other 'copyrighted stuff (Apple), at worst it's saying that we don't have the right to look or hear something without paying first. I understand that the artist needs to be paid, but the fact is, any good artist will already get paid well enough if they are mainstream, and desperately need their music shared if they are not.
If everything was copyrighted, and we all followed copyright laws, we wouldn't have 90% of the shit we have. Every stove is infringing on Ben Franklin's invention. The Ipod/Iphone was improved technology stolen from Microsoft pda. Microsoft was made off of stolen tech and info of Apple. All computer language is the remaking of the first. Light bulbs are stolen tech from Thomas Edison. Music is where the quote above came from. Do I really need to go on?
Copyright is a load bullshit that like everything else created by the rich and designed to fuck everyone else.
Pablo Picasso said that, I think.
*****
They are more or less the same. It was either copyright or patent that got Samsung sue by Apple for making a square with rounded edges smartphone. Apparently you can copyright a generic shape.
Also copyright laws are made only to benefit the big corps. Most of the casual games sold by the big corps in the Apple store industry stole their games from other people. You think candy crush is original, or bejewed? These corporations will steal from you, slap a copyright, and you cant do shit about it.
Copyright laws are meant to fuck you over. So are the user-end license agreement. Hell, if you ever read an UELA, you'll realize that you do not own what you paid for, they can take it away from you for any reason and at any time without having to give you a reason, they don't have to refund your money, and if what you paid for fucks up your stuff (like a computer) they are not responsible even if it was their fault.
Honestly, you SHOULD pirate everything because these people should be in prison for the level of scam this is. Oh, and that argument about how piracy cost jobs, they only "cost jobs" because the CEOs and such would rather fire a group of people, potentially destroying their lives, instead of taking any kind of pay cut form their 7+ figure annual pay.
Same with raising the minimal wage. These rich scumfuck will rather fuck over the entire country then take any kind of pay cut or pay any kind of fair income tax. Oh, and most of these people use all kinds of ways to get out of paying taxed.
*****
I know for a fact that they do. Its not like no did any studies into it. And again, people WILL support people they like even when they can get the stuff for free, Many Patreons work on that bases.
It's not like you can't sell something you created. Copyright should only deal with outright ripping off. If I took your game, changed the sprites and resold is as my own without changing anything, THEN you have a claim for infringement.
The way it is now, you so much a make commentary or a review, and you get hit with copyright infringement. Hell if you create something completely your using some characters from someone else you can get fucked by copyright. This is what happen to the ButtonMash series.
The idea of copyright law sounds good any hearing it but in all honesty like most laws are only to serve pretty much the rich while most people who may be great if they have benches by themselves and getting this if there is a pet them to you the law always says money never the people look up the Johnson and Johnson story about them using unsafe untested products on old people and babies that's like Skeletor evil
sniff thank you beside that what did you think of what i was saying.
Protomario makes original content and got a strike because a 14 year old kid claimed that the content was his, it's not.
Now that is just bullshit
WOW.
Red5rainbow I don't know what's more surprising: A kid my age figured out how to do that and succeeds, or that the kid isn't within the ages of 10-12.
That is sad
14 year olds don’t get enough shit tbh
UA-cam: *"We want our platform to become a safe place for children to use without exposure to inappropriate content! And as such, we will use Happy Tree Friends to describe youtube copyright infringement to an 8 year old."*
I find it funny how UA-cam advertises their copyright system as being totally fair and simple when it's the most complex and unfair piece of trash in the universe.
I want to be able to understand WHY Google/UA-cam doesn't do anything to improve the issue.
Cause they can get money from it
Bravelove Meow To them, the UA-cam Copyright system is like a money printer.
Because assholes.
***** It prints money. (From Google's perspective)
Because you to knows that the law by the wording of it sounds like it says everyone and most people won't care to research and do any extensive studies on the topic or subject and the people who do realize that the law mostly comes to serve people who are big business companies or an immense amount of wealth
The Happy Birthday Song is finally being released from copyright in March 2016. Things can get better!
+Badly Drawn Turtle
Just you wait; someone will buy the rights to it.
whiterabbit75
Nobody can buy the rights to something in the public domain. And it's not like the rights are just running out, either: The court case in question has the company paying millions of dollars in restitution for enforcing a copyright they shouldn't have had.
+Badly Drawn Turtle GOOD. So fucking sick of "copyright law". Copyright is meant to protect art, but instead big company's are using it to make more money.
icecream hero
I'm not sure if you're a troll, or just highly misinformed.
icecream hero
It's in the public domain. Nobody owns the rights to it anymore.
But youtube doesn't own happy tree friends, So they're basically telling us that copyright is bad when there actually doing it themselves😑
+Pikachu They could possibly paid the owners of HTFs aswell.
Some hypocritical jerks, huh?
***** But they broke their own copyright rule with this video.
They would never........ Its an illusion. XD
But Happy Tree Friends is popular on UA-cam.
What irritates me more than anything else is that I recently got a copyright strike for a video I posted almost 5 years ago. Like that video had been up for 5 years!!! But whatever...
look to thejwittz for info on how stupid it is
+Zackattackplayspokemon was that the guy who got his video taken down for his video being disturbing, and it was a pokemon creepypasta that he reviewed?
Chris Hallman No and yes, It was taken down for "spam" and it was a lavender town myths Pokemon fact of the day video. He had 2 videos saying just how much crap the claims were, and they have around a million views. It took a while for him to even find out why it was taken down, but he eventually got the strike off.
+Magia Girl
In regards to a copyright strike, it doesn't matter how long it's up, it can still be claimed or taken down a few hours after it is uploaded, or 2 decades afterwards. Community guidelines on the other hand, I think there should be a period where after which, reports of community violations are to be disregarded.
***** Maybe it was in one of those autoclaims. A company called Compass_CS autoclaimed my video the moment I posted it for "having audio that was copyrighted" when in reality it was background music and a cover of the japanese pokemon theme mad-paced getter. Besides it being a cover, nintendo is in no way affiliated with this company. Though, I think the company itself is a scam, I cant find anything about it anywhere besides unrelated companies with similar names or people saying their video has been claimed by Compass_CS
Derek Savage must have got his "fair use" lessons from "UA-cam Copyright School".
Ignorant of the lawl is not an ascuse.
😂😂😂
Yep...Cool cat loves you.
ZOOBOO
Echo Screams
What does that mean?
I love how they depict Russel as the bad guy for attempting to send a counter-notification. They're not even trying to hide the fact that they're on the side of the corporations.
Hey, everyone. I just copyrighted the every word and letter in the English dictionary, and I've also copyrighted living, breathing, speaking, walking, moving and a couple other things.
PAY UP
Rae Doodles Î'vé ćōpÿrīghtèd ćôpÿrîghtîñg. *SHUT UP AND GIVE ME YOUR MONEY!*
Hydrazine You know when I said I'd copyrighted a few other things? Yeah, those included copywriting people copywriting and copywriting copywriting. I WIN!!!
Rae Doodles capitalism in a nutshell lol
You copyrighted copywriting, but not copyrighting, Starfire.
I copyrighted this mailbox and this triagonal sign! Also, I own the word "triagonal".
So technically, "Happy Birthday" is a '90s song.
Oml...
+Dark Bowser He said it was made in the 1890s, so TECHNICALLY it was made in the '90s, just not the '90s you were thinking of (1990s).
***** Welcome to the Internet. Not suitable for easily offended people.
***** (eh? what's with the repetition?)
Look, if the point flew over your head, how about you let it go? Let it be free, explore new lands?
***** Let go of yourself. Achieve your own freedom. All posibilities are open.
It's life.
Wow. lamest episode of Happy Tree Friends ever. No one even died a brutal death.
-5/10
Hell, Russel got attacked by pihrannas and got shot out of a cannon into wood splinters and did not die. :C
klunsgod Exactly lol WTF is that?
Actually, there was a pretty brutal maiming if you look closely.
It was the UA-cam Copyright System.
***** Lol yeah but *I WANT BLOOD!*
Imagine all the teachers who shown this to their class and the kids who wanted to see Happy Tree Friends afterwards.
Oh boy.
Lmao I was one of them
"Good artists copy, great artists steal" -Picasso
-Me
"When I grow up, I want to be Sample Text." - Donelt Twump
What makes this sad is that popular channels like Pewdiepie and Smosh won't get copyrighted because UA-cam needs them for money and their fans, it's really sad.
And because UA-cam is too SCARED to actually do anything because people will lash out then UA-cam will have to get off it's lazy ass and fix their copyright shit.
Dell Vanity Agreed, it's just sad smh
Honestly, it won't change anytime soon unless we get something big together. Like, i'm sure if we mention something about getting youtube to change their copyright policy to big people who have been wronged by it, and get their help too, we'd be able to change it. Like, I believe Markiplier and NostalgiaCritic have both been wronged by the copyright system.
Dell Vanity That's actually a really good plan. But it's most likely going to be shut down by UA-cam themselves or people won't join it because they don't want to get anymore shit from UA-cam and other company's. UA-cam has a habit of shutting down big groups that go against UA-cam themselves. Plus UA-cam won't listen anyway, most of their admins are lazy as shit :\
Yeah, trust me, I know :/.
10:00- As if using HTF as their teaching tool didn't already convince me that UA-cam has never actually seen this series, having Lumpy be smart enough to file a copyright claim was pretty much the nail on the coffin.
So UA-cam is Hypocritical
Plus the fact russell didnt die in the end
This could really do for an Everything Wrong With video
Ikr. Mr. Enter and Jeremy from Cinema Sins should undoubtedly team up someday.
That would be great
ikr?
What makes it even more fitting is that CinemaSins regularly take advantage of Fair Use laws.
Mr. Enter would be Excellent at CinemaSins.
I've never seen anything so condescending and automatically persecuting towards youtubers o.o
Sad thing is I saw this on my subscriptions when I was about to go to sleep.
That wasn't really sad but ok.
Same here
*(hands you a hanky)*
Ditto (tritto?)
Same here odd
Funny, because HTF was written by the same guy who came up with this line:
Sonic: No copyright law in the universe will stop me!
If you are being serious, I am going to lose it.
Wow, just did some research, you are actually being serious. Both written by Ken Pontac. And I'm losing it now.
Oh my god
Considering he wrote something like HTF I'm not surprised.
YujiUedaFan It's the truth,the same writers of HTF wrote the story for Sonic Games.
"Happy Birthday" isn't copyrighted anymore.
i am the private owner of the alphabet song
That's right, every person sings it during a birthday selebration and yall ready to hear the cold hard truthe? If s, here it is. If not, tough luck, you fools who control copyright and who are greety money hungry millionares are going to hear it anyway. This is a message that goes out to all record labels here in the whole United states, including Nashville, and to all TV companies here in theUnited states. The song is in the public domane, just like the 90's TV show Rescue 911. This means that anybody in the whole United States can sing the song Happy birthday, and not be sued. I alone know who gets sued, and who doesn't get sued. The people who have recording contracts, record deals, and who work along side record labels releasing album after album are the only people who get sued and taken to court and charged 99 point 9 zillion dollars, then get demanded that the plantiff pay them in cash. The average person who's doing this as a hobbi is in the clear, and has nothing to worry about, as long as they aren't selling the song to make money, end of rant.
Does that mean anyone who sings a song by the Beatles or something automatically have lawyers pop up and knock at their door?
Since nobody else has used this quote, I guess I should do it, ahem... "EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION!? OH NO!!!"
GET OUT OF MY BOAT MOBILE!
*"AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!"*
I had a feeling you'd be VERY pissed with this one. Surprisingly, you were just annoyed. Seriously, HTF, if you guys meet Mr. Enter in a dark alley...someone is going to come out with a bloody nose and a black eye. The question is, who? :P
And do they really make you watch this if you get a strike? I don't think I want to be a famous UA-camr anymore...
You can always skip it, they make you take this test I think and if you know the bullshit answers (like with google) you can skip the bideo
Mrenter is not the only one who pissed off with this video
I also completely pissed off by that video (The original one)
There was never such a thing as a famous UA-camr. There was only ever a good UA-camr.
***** I mean tell that to youtubers who appear a-list events and get their own tv shows.
Under 301 club how tough ar... **gunshot**
Laurits Kristiansen... I feel like I've seen you on another channel...
Hey everyone, Reg is dead! :D We're all permitted into the Under 301 Club now!!
David Cupps lol that's more impossible than tough.
So?
And the bullet was made from ice. That's why it was never found.
Enter explains the copyright laws better than the video trying to explain it in the first place
Palmer Witzel agreed
The video says that it's illegal to record concerts, but i've seen people record concerts on youtube before, so basically this video is bull.
The Furry is right..
+Kiki The Fox Recording concerts is very much illegal; it's just that most bands encourage it and some record labels turn a blind eye to it. Infringing content being on UA-cam and not getting taken down does not mean that the content wasn't infringing but that nobody was willing to take even the modest effort to take it down. Takedowns are so easy that most of them are done by automated bots now, so the only reason why the content is still up is that it's either not been found by the bots yet, or that the bots are specifically programmed to exclude that content.
+Super Smash Dolls If I understand correctly, IHE's channel was taken down by bots?
+Shadowtails Derol it's back
I am very aware.
I like how it's the PIRATE character who's getting the lessons on infringement
CLASSY.
Because they had to be SUBTLE(Pfft), because they think they're smart (even though they can't get their own copyright shit right)
Ok..... So what I got from this..... is that UA-cam's copy right system is so messed up that if I wanted too, I could go around looking up every video that has anything to do with Peanutbutter, claim that I own the rights to Peanutbutter, and get said videos removed because of this?
Wait follow up question.... If I filed a complaint against myself for uploading something I own could I get my own video removed?
Sorry but it looks like the system is so messed up that I want to try to breaking it myself!
I really want to see you try and copyright your own video, I am seriously curious now
*Do it, record yourself doing it, and then send the video to the UA-cam HQ.*
This may be the only way to get through UA-cam's thick skull
Or just send youtube a recording of your peanutbutter idea. If you actually create a big enough fiasco UA-cam will have no choice but to react because they would be in legal hot water themselves. (Of course this is kind of a sacrificial maneuver, so you should probably make an alternate account for it.)
I just tried claiming that a video that was uploaded on my account was mine and after putting in the url it gave me a message that It was my video so unfortunetly I can't do that.... Still Strongly Considering the Peanutbutter thing though
You leave PeanutButterGamer the hell alone!
I learned more about the copyright process thanks to you! This video was more educational than the video it was reviewing.
You don't know shit about copyright. MrEnter is a bunch of lies and hypocrisy.
***** Not as much as UA-cam itself is.
WasabiKitKat UA-cam has a better understanding of fair use than MrEnter. MrEnter is a whiny crybaby who considers himself entitled to use other people's hard work.
***** He has never used their hardwork. He rarely plays any actual clips with audio from the shows he talks about. You're implying that all reviewers are bad.
WasabiKitKat That entire video was used in his review, are you fucking blind?!
Not only does this video suck, they also forced the creators of happy tree friends to make a episode without any gore in it
Maybe because watching this kind of topic is aIready painfuI enough to watch
The artists of happy tree friends, locked in youtube’s basement, as they are forced to draw not a single drop of blood, horrible
If I had a nickel for every time I had to sit through this malarkey on my old UA-cam account, "MrCartoonLover777", I'd have enough to buy a four course meal. Granted, I was playing with heavy fire, since my most popular videos were "fandubs" of Little Bear, and a few "commentaries" of MLP episodes.
But, back on topic, plain and simple, fuck UA-cam's copyright system. It's a load of bullshit. :P
There's fandubs of Little Bear!?!
Seriously stop the thumbs up and GIVE ME INFO PLEASE.
I need these fandubs pls
Sikanto ikr
But could you buy a one *coarse* meal?
UA-cam's copyright system is more broken than Viacom itself.
UA-cam: Ruining you're programs one way or a nother!
"They like to pretend that fair use doesn't exist" MY SENTIMENTS EXACTLY, just like how networks pretend how quality control doesn't exist.
Usually on Happy Tree Friends, they kill each other by complete accident. Except for Flippy when his PTSD kicks in
This may be a pipe dream, but what about a mass lawsuit against UA-cam by everyone who has been unjustifiably boned by the copyright system? A company that can flag a video review by a person, then that person dispute the claim, win, and then have the same video flagged again by the same company, AND then that company receive ad revenue from the video without the users consent doesn't just sound like bullshit, it sounds like it should be fucking illegal. How is it possible for something like that to happen without any type of public internet uproar? On what legality can a company get ad revenue from a video without the creators consent or compensation?
with the amout of patreon users and kickstaretrs and whatnot gathering up a bunch of lawyers will eb a sinch:) and maybe in turn google sues viacom for making fals flags and ruinign their image and such:D
that might just go down in the history books
TheGameMerchant this is the most based idea I've seen in A long time.
I don't want to be that guy but
Good luck suing google
***** bwahahaha and cut off their most profitable revenue? the oen that made their empire millions and allowed them to develope wodnerful technology? i dont think so:P
there is talk of prominant youtube perosnalities moving to a new startup when youtube will impliment this new cash grab of banning non approved sponsorships so maybe they will clean u their act when all their profitable cows run off.
I remember liking this shit of a cartoon. at it's like hard to find a good web cartoon series.
I personally love home star runner
I agree with Justin, Homestar Runner is a really good Web cartoon.
Justin Talmadge You hear they might be bringing it back? I have to find that article again, but they were impressed by the huge amount of viewers that came in after last year's April Fools video.
grillingdrugs Super Mario Bros. Z is a good series
They actually have brought it back. You see the halloween video?
“That's more like it! By singing an original song, you're creating your own content!”
This is implying that the remixes mentioned before aren't original content. Just because they're caught up in copyright disputes doesn't mean they aren't valuable creative contributions. Almost nothing is made out of whole cloth, and the true power of creativity is in building on each other's ideas. The moment you release an idea into the public sphere, it's the public's. If someone else can use the idea better than you can, then the entirety of society benefits when that person is allowed to improve on your idea.
And even then, the "original" content could still get attacked.
1: HTF was created by Kenn Navarro and Mondo Media.
2: Russell is voiced by Francis Carr and Lumpy is voiced by David Winn.
7:59 you know there are asexual people who want kids. :\. *well not want myself to*. they mostly would adopt a kid.
grillingdrugs did you know mrenter speaks for all of asexual people.
***** the way I understood asexuality is they understand sex and love. and know the point they just don't feel that attraction. You can want a natural child.
***** Yeah, it's as simple as that.
@emo ghost well I'm more of greysexal myself. But it's thing some peolpe have.
I don't understand how if you're asexual you can't just get over your squeamishness about sex for the sake of begetting children for your spouse. No offense to asexual people, but if you wanted kids would you really go through the trouble of adoption or in-vitro fertilization just because "Ew, sex is icky"?
I think it's painfully obvious MrEnter is mad a UA-cam.
He's been like that ever since he first got strikes on videos like his My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic reviews. It's just that companies like Fox and especially Viacom ended up getting him over the tipping point there.
Yeah it is. its getting kinda annoying everybody that uses copyrighted materials in their work have to deal with it so it's not like he was singled out he needs to let it go.
So in the end not only did they blew it, they can suck our bone.
Because Slutcom and Fox in the Box
I don't think so I am sorry there are more people that did deal with just as much as him and just because he feels the effect of the problem does not mean you know what cost it. He can blame you tube or Google or whatever but he keeps failing to realize that they have to follow the law too and that you tube doesn't need him he needs UA-cam so complaining isn't going to do anything.
So, is the piranha juggling a metaphor for just how difficult it is to make a video that won't be claimed accidently or otherwise? It almost seems like a cheeky admission that it is so convoluted.
Yes, losing your UA-cam account is WAY MORE important than losing something that you rely on to live!
It is
ive had to watch this about 3 times in the past 3 years. It's ironic as fuck since my entire channel is based on the show
The main problem is that I don't understand where the line is drawn on this whole copyright matter.
Should I just film myself naked in a white room? That's because the clothes I wear belong to the factories that make them. The furniture in my room belong to furniture companies. In fact, even if I were to sew my own clothes, the sewing kit belongs to people who made them, in fact, wool belongs to farmers that own the sheep that were sheared.
So my question is.. where is the line drawn? Excuse me, but I have OCD, and these copyright rules are irritating it.
I hate that stupid video - I had to watch it when my channel got hit with a copyright strike because I reviewed some dude's "real ghost video" and pointed out all the reasons it was CLEARLY fake (it was actually a rather convincing video and it took some real probing to pick out the flaws), but of course it got hit because why would he want anyone knowing it was fake? Even though his entire channel is a spam channel. It has like eight "real ghost" videos, but they're just two varieties of the same four videos (clearly a sign of fakes). So now I don't get to post videos over 15 minutes until April (my priority is creepypasta narrations and a lot of those are longer than 15 minutes). It's really frustrating, but I didn't want to appeal to UA-cam because I'm afraid of getting in legal trouble even though I used to video under intentions of review purposes. I hate people that try to trick others into believing their lies then get made when they're called out on the bullshit. I sent the dude an email asking him to remove the strike, but he ignored me because... why not. Ugh.
Waldemar Quiles Uhhh.... ooookkkaaaayy.... (btw this is my personal channel not the one that got hit with the strike)
+rockergrrl113 Do a counter claim
+rockergrrl113 You absolutely have the right to make a counter claim. Using something for reviewing purposes falls under fair use. I understand being worried about fighting it, but it's a pretty cut and dry case of fair use, so it would never get far enough to go to court. Prove to UA-cam that it's a review and that's legally fair use, and you'll be fine.
I'm dealing with this because of my big mouth review ehhh
0:33 I see this as UA-cam's desperate attempt at trying to make Happy Tree Friends a kids show.
I love how people say Mr.Enter is a terrible UA-camr, when he is one of the only people to beat Viacom in a copyright battle and get his videos back up.
WHAAAAT?! UA-cam being... LAZY?! And inconsistent and lying?! What blasphemy is this? UA-cam would never!
Basicly copyright is good but youtube uses it incorrectly.
+CRAZY GAMER3000
More like they use it with an immensely blatant bias towards those whom don't make them enough money to be considered a relevant or "worth anything to us" channel, they do away with the underdogs and keep supporting the UA-camrs that break many copyright laws yet earn them tons of money, or just flat out advertise channels which are literally well known music artists, sports, TV channels, pretty much recommending everything to you that embodies everything UA-cam SHOULDN'T be, and didn't used to be when it was in the hands of someone competent. But hey, that's UA-cam now, isn't it? Fuck encouraging creativity and expression of one's self through content of various types withing legal reason, we just want money,everyone else can screw off.
yep sounds like them!
More like copyright is bad and UA-cam uses it incorrectly
That video should have been a parody of the copyright school, not an actual video teaching you about copyright.
You said it, Rich, these copyright claimers are complete morons!
"Original content is what makes UA-cam interesting!" Yeah, because you're making money off of SOMEONE ELSE'S WORK. Does UA-cam directly employ any of its content creators? NO! 2 things need to happen soon before a vlogging market crash happens and no one wants to create content as a career anymore, (even though living off the content uploaded to a website that's quickly finding new ways to crash itself into the ground is completely humanly illogical, no one should have to depend on a market for human survival) a website should be created that directly employs content creators, and videos can't be flagged in any way unless the copyright claimer goes out of their way to directly contact the website to claim their copyrighted material was infringed upon. Trust me, someone claiming copyright that's serious will do what's necessary to get the content removed, this removes any doubt that a false copyright claimer is otherwise being a dick and claiming it for no reason just to be malicious.
This brings me to my second thing that needs to happen, complete revision or abolition of copyright, which sole purpose to exist is that a creation can still generate revenue, even if the creator has otherwise no use for it. (because, you know, they're dead or whatever) Restriction to modify copyrighted material reduces the ability for talented people to take a work of art and make it whatever they see fit, either better or worse off, even without financial generation or incentive. AM2R was taken down by Nintendo, even though it was generating absolutely no profit, copyright still held it in intellectual prison because market share trumps human ingenuity. If you want people to make better creations for us all to enjoy, best remove copyright as it's a huge roadblock that only makes select few people profit of of someone else's labour and time, and eventually when everything is owned and nothing is publically accessible, maybe then people will wake up and see it for the monster it is. Everything you think you own, you owe to nature first, you're just borrowing it for the short measly time you have on the planet.
Midnight Mechanic too long, didn't read
@@oasis9615 bad excuse , i read the whole thing . its TWO paragraphs
6:06 I think you should have mentioned that the strike used is from Family Feud.
SO UA-cam COMMITED COPYRIGHT INFRINGEMENT.
I got a copywrite claim on my own music XD
IIt sucked, rip
Mawai Tabbitha me too
I got one on my own review my original content
It's copyright not copywrite idiot
If i had one cent for every bit of irony from this video, i would be RICH.
Also i would be cringing for days.
I do appreciate how Mr. Enter treats this as seriously as someone who thinks any sane person who want to know how the UA-cam Copyright System works will turn to the goddamn Happy Tree Friends for answers.
I just realized on Russel's Iphone it's 4:20 PM
If that video were realistic the TV screen would've fell over on top of everyone at the theater and splatter them into a mess of blood and guts.
Almost a decade later, these problems are still there.
My channel doesn't qualify for Ad Sense, but at the same time my "claimed" and "reported" videos do have ads.
Some videos are private/unlisted (and are only viewable with a link), some are brief clips (these are claimed by a company that doesn't own it), some are livestreams (that are claimed for minutes of music). Ironically, the only music claim I was unable to dispute was being claimed for the original song when I was playing a parody that I had permission to use.
So does that remind me that all the unlisted MyMusic News videos have been private?
This review makes for a MUCH more informative copyright analysis than the video being reviewed.
Hooray! I've been waiting for this review for months/ I've been waiting for you to tackle this piece of shit right in the groin where it deserves!
One down. Four to go
Aldo Meylano ???
I mean he reviewed one of episodes that I want him to review. Just four requests to go (Actually, UA-cam Copyright School wasn't a request. But I want him to review it faster to show how broken UA-cam Copyright System is)
***** He just tackled, because kicking would've taken too long.
I think that the Mars Needs Moms review will come soon enough, probably by summer.
I hear that some assholes record common audio that sounds the same anywhere, such as rain, and claim it legally as their original content. This way, you could be talking during a rainstorm and get your video copyright claimed.
21st century everyone.
yaaay
+EXTREMEKIWI115 You have got to be fucking kidding me
+Rainbow Friendship Now that it seems you can copyright words like "react" it seems even more likely, unfortunately...
***** Yeah, fuck Fine Bros
HTF is Like Itchy & Scratchy, mixed with Final Destination, injected with Manhunt, with Mortal Kombat sprinkled on top
+Vince Shadell No. It's made of stuffed animals and inside flesh.
what?
Vince Shadell Come on, think about it. Stuffed animals toys + Inside Flesh + Real Animals= HTF.
I meant the shows over the-top-violence is like those things mixed together
+Vince Shadell
Pretty much I think the theme also is ripped off something as I swear i heard it somewhere else.
And this video was created before UA-cam implemented the ID claim system, so it was video removed or nothing.
6:20 Apparently, Mr Enter's back because of Black magic and voodoo witchcraft.
UA-cam: YOU CAN'T STEAL STUFF THAT'S BAD (echos)
UA-cam 30 minutes later: I steal from HTF.
I just realised technically UA-cam stole the HTF characters and gave no credit to Mondo. Oh god.
MohawkDoesMC Wouldn't it be just hilarious if that video got taken down for copyright?
stride99 YES. JUSTICE. PLEASE.
UA-cam, were the users know more about copyright then the company itself.
This is why I don't make videos, I don't have the time to deal with this kind of legal bullshit :/ I'll just remain an observer of quality content...until it gets taken down.
Understandable. I make videos because I want it to be my job. That way I can work hard and have fun doing it. When it comes to let's players videos, they actually get taken down because of the game's music and not so much the game footage itself. So you just have to be careful about talking over the music and you'll be fine. The first video I uploaded was a test video for my first let's play, I didn't have any commentary on it so it got hit. The strike I got was for the game music (it does the courtesy of telling you instead of forcing you to figure out what you did). I took the video down myself because it was a test to see how it looked. When I uploaded the video with commentary I didn't get a strike.
bonnie641 I made my account 5 years ago when I was 17, but it was solely with the intention of faving and commenting on videos at first. Eventually I wanted to upload gameplay videos of retro games but I saw not only was that topic being done to death but that many videos were being claimed by copyright because of in-game music and decided I'd stay with my original intention.
bonnie641 Yup ^^ The journey getting here has been kinda fun, I must admit.
Zelnyair Oh, I have a good one bookmarked already, I use clipconverter.cc to get both mp3 and mp4 rips of videos.
Amen to that - at least they can't take out comments away - LolZ
Honestly, UA-cam should just have an option to decline earnings. If you don't claim to own it, and you can't make any money from it, there is no infringement. You are just giving them free advertising.
+101jir Doesn't work that way. Some people might buy music after listening to it for free on UA-cam to support the artists, but what percentage is that? I would argue that ad revenue or not, the uploader stole content, and posted it for people to watch for free and thus the original artist and associates would lose profit more than anything else. But I guess this is more explaining piracy in general, not just copyright stuff.
***** If that's the way the law actually works, no wonder it is a mess. If you have to hide what you are selling in case you didn't do a good job, nobody is going to trust that field. Simply being exposed to a song should not be enough reason to file a complaint for monetary losses, and certainly would be embarrassing for those that did. "You exposed people to my bad song, and now that everyone knows it's terrible nobody will buy it, I'm gonna sue you." I don't think that will fly.
Unless you are talking about people downloading the music from UA-cam, in which case I highly doubt that the uploader is responsible for what other people do to their video using external programs, so long as the uploader did not provide or endorse those programs.
In case of people using repeat for exposure to the song, it is often low quality with sound effects or speaking over it. It can be edited out with certain software outside of UA-cam, but again the uploader is not responsible for that behavior.
People can use that content for free if it is a critique, and other conditions do exist where permission does not need to be asked where they can make money. You could release a video lambasting a song for its horrible quality, make money on that video, and not have to pay a dime for use of the song. Yet using the song as background for something else would be piracy even nobody makes any money off of it with full disclosure? I mean, maybe I am just naive and that is something that the law has not yet rectified, but to me the latter seems far more just.
101jir I am talking aboot people uploading full soundtracks, movies, episodes, and song albums unedited, completely stolen so everyone can listen or watch for free. Most are just fine in quality, and even if they lose a bit of quality, why pay $15 dollars for an album, why pay $30 for a movie or support the makers in any way when this random guy posted it so I could watch it for free, and screw anyone in the business that is trying to make money for their work.
I think your original comment was vague enough that we were talking aboot two slightly different things. But the same thing still applies to your comment. If someone was to put a Justin Beiber song or whatever in the background of some animal abuse video, and that went viral, Justin didn't give that person permission to use his song in that context. That is an extreme example, but some artists and distribution companies don't want their products in the background of some video they gave no permission for.
***** Well, there is that. I suppose that would be the exception to the rule, but if you are using the full track of something from a CD as a background for something completely unrelated, I hardly see how they can claim copyright when you aren't costing them any money and offering them free advertising. I would say even if it is unedited, so long as the sole purpose is not to provide the music or show a clip from a movie.
That just wasn't what came to mind at first.
edit: Though in that regard, the loophole would be fairly obvious: put some personal opinions in the annotations and leave the video / audio itself unedited. You still get the protection while hiding the real purpose of giving people free access to the stuff. Not to mention one can make money off that. Copyright in the digital age is such a mess.
And to think, it's only gotten worse since then... 😔
I gotta a strike for ranting about Family Guy :/
Dammit, Meg!
Were you using a episodes from Family Guy? If not then that is some serious shit they not doing.
Bloody Prankster I had it playing in the background sadly so distorded audio and no visuals. :/
CokeEpic = ((Ryan)) It could have been from even just putting "family guy" in the tags.
Even worse, The Beatles are being pulled by UMG_MK and making users watch this warning video.
Evidently, UMG hates The Beatles.
really?
I shit you not, I watched this in technology class in 6th grade.
Same here.
I laughed so hard at 8:46 UA-cam doesn't even try to hide that they hate fair use
UA-cam is a private website.
@@SolarX- More like private company.
(If you watch Technocracy, you'll know why I made this reply.)
@@jerricaleonard2123 I seen it. Vast Improvement than 3 years prior.
Fair use is great but it's easy to get exceeded of this shit
This is why they ignore Fair Use