World War II warplanes| Planes of Japan| Nakajima Ki-44

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 25

  • @airwarriors113
    @airwarriors113  2 роки тому +1

    World War II warplanes| Planes of Japan| Nakajima Ki-44
    Creation history, technical characteristics, combat use.
    In the 1930s, the main quality for Imperial Army fighters was high maneuverability - even at the expense of speed.
    The Ki-44 aircraft was atypical in this respect - when it was designed, the goal was to ensure high speed characteristics.
    Conceptually, the machine was conceived as a fighter-interceptor designed to act together with twin-engine Ki-45: faster Ki-44s had to restrain the enemy in combat, and the approaching Ki-45s had to destroy enemy bombers.
    Subscribe to the channel, and you will learn a lot of interesting facts about military aviation.
    #militaryaviation
    #planesofWW2
    #history
    #PlanesofJapan

  • @Glidescube
    @Glidescube Рік тому +2

    Let's not forget Nakajima become Subaru after the war

  • @FRIEND_711
    @FRIEND_711 2 роки тому +1

    I do like this videos even with some mistakes here and there. (such as the car :,D was funny though)
    I honestly would suggest that you edit out the pauses between every line or at least shorten them and maybe speed up your video? it honestly sounded very natural when listening to x2 speed and it was pretty good.

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks for the advice. I will definitely take advantage of it. About the plane being called a car, you are absolutely right. I have already pointed out this unfortunate error. I am new to this topic and am still learning, so please forgive me.

    • @FRIEND_711
      @FRIEND_711 2 роки тому

      @@airwarriors113 hey its all good man. we learn from our mistakes to be better in the next one ^w^
      and hey if you ever need help I would be happy to help in any way i can. I can read Japanese since I am one :P lol

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому

      Thank you very much

  • @jeremywilson4326
    @jeremywilson4326 Рік тому

    Would love to build and fly one of these.

  • @BatBreakr
    @BatBreakr 2 роки тому +2

    Planes keep being called "cars..." good start but pleeeeease edit it..

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому

      Thank you for your comment. You are entitled to believe that an airplane is not a machine, but if you consider that a machine is a physical system that uses energy to exert forces and control motion to perform an action, then perhaps an airplane can be included in this definition.

    • @BatBreakr
      @BatBreakr 2 роки тому +1

      @@airwarriors113 I think you misunderstood me... I agree an airplane is a machine. However, by definition it is not an automobile. In the video it is called a "car" multiple times. I figured that there was an editing issue as calling an airplane an automobile is incorrect. I liked the video, but that part threw me off a bit as it is factually incorrect. Other than that I felt the video was actually very good and factual. I intend to subscribe once I'm done typing this, It's constructive criticism not by any means intended as an attack on your work.

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому +1

      Yes, I see your point. In this case you are absolutely right. It is an unfortunate inaccuracy. It happens. And as for criticism, I don't mind it at all. It is very useful in terms of improving the quality of content. Once again, thank you very much.

  • @jmfa57
    @jmfa57 2 місяці тому

    "Car?" Seriously? Please post videos prepared by humans, not by AI bots.

  • @jeffreymcdonald8267
    @jeffreymcdonald8267 Рік тому

    Its a AI narrator. Hence the long pauses and calling planes cars.

  • @bobyoung1698
    @bobyoung1698 3 місяці тому

    Tojo? I thought we called this one the "Frank."

  • @stephenmeier4658
    @stephenmeier4658 2 роки тому

    Cars?

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому

      Why not?

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому

      If you'll excuse me. I did not immediately understand your question. I fully share your perplexity. Such unfortunate mistakes happen.

  • @marinegunny826
    @marinegunny826 2 роки тому

    Looks like they tried to make their own P-47

    • @airwarriors113
      @airwarriors113  2 роки тому

      Yes, you may be right.

    • @davecrober5069
      @davecrober5069 2 роки тому

      Check out the 'Frank' that came out later in the war. Similar traits to the P-47 .

  • @spectra7gaming471
    @spectra7gaming471 5 місяців тому

    Carribean Jerk beef jerkey

  • @janseiders1540
    @janseiders1540 2 роки тому

    Key? It's Ki . Please learn the pronunciation

  • @FeiHuWarhawk
    @FeiHuWarhawk 2 роки тому

    H and then A not hahahah