Science of Bob Lazar's UFO Explored
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 чер 2021
- Bob Lazar has captured the imaginations of skeptics who question if we are alone in the universe and if extraterrestrial life has visited Earth. Recently he appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast and agreed to allow film maker Jeremy Corbell to make the NetFlix documentary Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers. In this video we will analyze some of his incredible claims.
💯 LET’S CONNECT 💯
🐦 Twitter @Broe_Jake 👉 / broe_jake
📷 Instagram @JakeBroe 👉 / jakebroe
🔔 Become a channel member 🔔
Best way to support me: 🌟 🎓 👑
/ @jakebroe
Buy Me a Coffee ☕️
www.buymeacoffee.com/jakebroe
My Patreon Page:
/ jakebroe
You can also support me with PayPal:
🔥 Find me: jakebroeyt@gmail.com
🔥 paypal.me/JakeBroeYT
👇 👇 Watch My Other Videos Here 👇 👇
★ My Reaction to UFOs Confirmed by DoD
• UFOs Confirmed REAL by...
★ Science of Bob Lazar's Element 115 Explored
• Science of Bob Lazar's...
★ Science of Bob Lazar's Water Powered Car Explored
• Science of Bob Lazar's...
================
Joe Rogan Experience 1315 - Bob Lazar & Jeremy Corbell
• Joe Rogan Experience #...
Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers
www.imdb.com/title/tt9107368/
Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs
• Navy pilots describe e...
Navy pilots recall “unsettling” 2004 UAP sighting
• Navy pilots recall “un...
================
📧 E-mail me at: JakeBroeYT [at] gmail [dot] com
Official business inquiries can be sent here. Personal e-mails will be discarded.
================
#UAP #Element115 #BobLazar
================
DISCLAIMER:
This video is for entertainment purposes only. I am not in any way acting as an agent or representative of the Department of Defense or United States Federal Government when presenting this information. I am not a legal or financial expert or have any authority to give legal or financial advice. While all the information in this video is believed to be accurate at the time of its recording, realize this channel and its author makes no express warranty as to the completeness or accuracy, nor can it accept responsibility for errors appearing in this video.
Thanks for watching all! Once again, this video is just a fun thought exercise. We may never know the truth of Bob Lazar' story, but one thing is certain--our own level of scientific and technological development will continue to move forward.
Have you seen my other channel on a Graphene space ship concept idea? I used the information from the other videos shown in playlists under the "created playlists" on my other channel.
And my other channel can be found by going to my channel, when you get there.. click on the words "created playlists" and save that link to your browser's favorites.
And.. let Bob Lazar know about my Graphene space ships concept idea, but be sure he knows about the "created playlists" on my other channel and to watch everything starting from the bottom.
Don't question it, go find out on my other channel under the "created playlists", when you start at the bottom of the created playlists, and work your way to the top playlists.
Under each playlist, start with the top video, please don't cherry - pick through my other channel's "created playlists" and not through the videos in each playlist, watch everything.
Jake, here is a really old clip of Bob Lazar explaining with diagrams how they thought the 115 interacted in the reactor/generator/amplifier. I believe their understanding of how the reactor functioned was an educated guess because the reactor's interior could not be directly observed and attempted disassembly of a different reactor had already killed some people. ua-cam.com/video/AheoPrqz4L0/v-deo.html
All technology is a progression and is bounded by the Laws of Physics.
Check how we design and build "billion" transistor chips (we use in every CPU). We are now at the edge of the limit of our technology. - limited by the size of the atom. Transistors are almost reaching the limits of miniaturization at atomic levels. We are approaching the size of atoms which is a fundamental barrier (Laws of Physics)
Our Periodic Table of Elements - is a list of all element in the universe, anything heavier than uranium (92) are not usually found in nature, they are radioactive and unstable (decays in seconds - and mostly not of any use)
Any "alien" spaceship will be made from the elements in the PTE. And any alien being would be made of the same elements as any other living things like us. - hydrogen, oxygen, carbon, etc. they are also the most common elements in the universe. - their "blood and guts" can be the made if the same things as any other living creatures on earth.
These UAP's are something else - we just do not know what. - They do not create a splash when they enter the ocean. They are not affected by anything here on earth or the universe (gravity, atmosphere, ocean, vacuum of space, etc.)
We can deduce that they could be massless entities that are alive and conscious, they react defensively to navy jets and even jam their radar.
Check out studies of diamagnetic levitation, interesting stuff.
You forgot to add in on the bullet points is that 30 years ago lazar said that the thing would go up and belly up to go forward. Sort of what the navy footage should when it rotated to switch directions.
"should"????
What the navy *showed (not "should").
Also the recent footage of ufo’s shows this as accurate
There's photos of UFO's doing this in the 60's so it was nothing new. Lazar made up his tall tale.
He actually claimed he worked in S4. Not Area 51. 15 miles away
Which goes in the Plus column towards his credibility
It's compartmentalized. S4 is section 4, area 51.
S4 is still area51... but even the fact that he knew that existed and differentiated it before anyone else knew, since proven to exist, adds credibility.
@@foff-666lets not forget they denied him working there but the paperwork said he was🥸
The intro killed me "DOES THIS SCIENTIFICALLY MAKE SENSE?, now I'm not a scientist"
🤣🤣
And it becomes very clear throughout these 30 minutes that he's definitely not a scientist.
Przybylski's Star has elements that exist above Uranium
Or a You Tuber !@@brinta2868
One of the most interesting stand out things to me is when he explains that it tilts to its side and is pretty much vertical once it wants to “shoot” in a certain direction. There have been a few videos out there. Like the gimble and the video shot in South America on a Motorola razer phone where the object tilts on its side and then speeds off. Bob was talking about this before those videos surfaced…
Good comment, I also like that he admitted having a hard time describing what the alien technology inside the ship looks like, saying it was so 'weird' that he couldn't find ways of defining what he was seeing. This rings true for me - when confronted with technology person a million years more advanced than ours, we would have a huge problem trying to simply figure out what we were looking at - none of it would make any sense. A faker wouldn't do this - they'd make up something based on TODAY'S technology "Yeah...there were huge computer screens all over" drivel based on things they'd seen in Hollywood movies.
gimbal video has been debunked, motorola video is obviously fake
@@t4404 the tic tac video showed them spinning.
@@FlydreamMedia thanks for your completely useless comment👍
@@t4404gimble hasn't been debunked what's your source on that
When we think everything is Impossible nothing will be invented.
Deep.
Nicholas. I like that. 👍
Is it just me or does everyone that tries to prove his statements wrong ignore half of the statements in order to prove that he is wrong
@@dominikcapuano9900 just you
Well not quite, physics will always be physics.
Joe’s podcast was way better than the woowoo documentary.
@@thomaslatth665 that's so woowoo
@@mrdan5943 for closed minded fools
Corbellend is a fraud.
I 100% agree.. Jeremy Corbell is so full of it.. The amount of times he's constantly trying to promote his self importance, makes you want to vomit. "I discovered Bob", "I broke the story", "I released exclusive whatever".. Then constantly stating things as fact without sufficient proof. If that dude quit talking about himself and interjecting himself into all these stories that he has nothing to really to do with.. I think people would like his material ALOT better.
This is bullying leave JC alone
Imagine if we met aliens and they were still using dial up modem.
I think this is exactly why Bob Lazar did not want to go public with his knowledge.
I love the production on the video. I don't really see people using your style of showing us photos, quotes, and bullet points. Its like I'm watching a presentation. Thanks bud.
Thanks Duval! I keep it simple and informative on my channel!
@@JakeBroe omicron?.... Delta?... configuration?!? Corona!!!! conspiracy much?!! hahaha weird that,thats what it's called and with the coronavirus thing... perfect!
@@atomthegreat541 I have absolutely no idea what you’re trying to say
Edit: I got to that portion of the video, now I get it lol
@@Me-kt3gh Hahaha..Word!
@@atomthegreat541 woooooooord!!!
Here is my question: What has Bob Lazar done for a living since 1989?
In the recent Bob Lazar documentary, it appears that Bob Lazar has a business supplying specialized materials to other labs. Located in California. ua-cam.com/video/C4jvIGGvQmo/v-deo.html
Selling bullshit.
He ran a few brothels, got arrested for it. Sold chemicals to make fire works illegally online. Got busted for it. Now he sells prints of his UFO drawings, merch, book deals, tv shows, etc.
He formed and runs a company called United Nuclear, they have a Web site, go see 👍
He has his own company
You have such a gift for teaching complicated scientific principles! This was a wonderful video to follow along as I could actually understand what you were saying. So fun to think about! Thank you 💜
I wish someone would ask Lazar what instruments he used to determine that the material had 115 protons.
Yes, it's call a bulls!#+ meter.
I wish Lazar was ever in the same room with an actual engineer or physicist.
Who knows what they use?? People need to understand alien thinking not human thinking. We have no idea. What capabilities they are able of.
Yeah that's my biggest problem, how do we or Lazar know (if he's not lying) that the gov didn't just throw out some random element out there? Unless Lazar did a NMR spectroscopy or IR he has no clue as to what was in the fluid.
It's called X-ray fluorescence and was invented in 1928
The craft Lazar described does not "pull itself forward" using gravity. It focuses the gravity wave emitters to pull space in the direction it wants to go to itself (creating a gravity 'well'), then shuts off, causing space to snap back to its original position, taking the craft with it. So the craft does not "travel through space", but simply moves with space as space is warped ahead of the craft.
I just love it when someone does understand... it seems hard to explain to people (at least in here Mexico)
Ah yes... when it is hmm warping? that space-time fabric ahead, while "crossing it" it essentially "exist" through that space-time... to me that is mind-blowing.
This is how I knew lazar was telling the truth. To me it just seems logical. The ships don't fly they are essentially falling through a gravitational well in essence. I imagined it in sorts of like creating a black hole in front of the craft and the craft is being pulled towards it. I imagine its controlled in pretty much the same way me move a cursor on a computer screen. Anywhere you drag the cursor is the way the ship moves.
I'm always thinking about this type of stuff. I stay up at night thinking about how they move in the manner they do.
Let's say inside the craft the AI creates a 3D sphere of the space idk how many kilometers around the craft, if it detects let's say a fighter jet, then the AI highlights all crafts let's say into red dots but gives the direction of travel of each dot, maybe it just outright makes a 3d model of said crafts and direction of travel.
So all the pilot of the UFO has to do, is drag his finger or maybe their contact lenses work the same way a fighter pilots helmet has a Heads up display, because from what I've read their eyes are not actually jet black those are just contacts they wear. So those contacts are like a heads up display, for just about anything you can think of, think of them like a super high tech apple watch which gives vitals or any other information they want like a cell phone but its built wired into their brain so all they have to do is think about whatever and boom there it is.
So back to how the vehicle moves, it tracks via eye movement.
So between the eye movement and the 3D sphere they just move the cursor around in 3D space and thats where the craft goes like draging a stylus around on a tablet screen. Thats how a jet can be behind the UFO and 2 seconds later the UFO is behind the jet. The pilot of the UFO just drags this cursor thats in 3D space and drags it like he's making the letter C and boom now he's behind you.
The ship has AI so like a tesla car it also has a built in anti collision sensor so it just can't run into stuff.
When they are operating in a planetary environment they just turn on only 1 of the gravitational amplifiers so the craft is only operating at like 20% but even then its far ahead of anything we have.
Once they get outside of a planet they turn on all 3 then its like a warp drive type effect all 3 gravitational amplifiers are synced to each other and they focus and create a singularity or damn near close to it and they just blink in and out of 3D space, when all 3 are turned on.
to them everything outside of their craft is basically frozen in time because they are moving so fast. Idk thats my late night theory of how the craft works.
So even if it was one of them vs 50 fighter jets they are still far superior and would just easily down all 50 jets if they wanted,
for them its just about picking the highest threat level first and knocking them out one by one, but because they are moving in a manner we can't.
They would literally just be bouncing around blasting everything out of the sky. Maybe they don't even have to do anything the AI does it all for them.
@@georgesmith4639 i could not agree more with you... but just for a second, let's say that they can manipulate the so called: "gravitational waves". Maybe then they could do something like what Lazar is describing... yet, and this is a big one, we cannot ignore the fact that energy conservation still holds true for the E=mc^2 + [...] . So you are right, this keeps me awake at night. I mean, I may be trying hard to squeeze that what Lazar said to our physics right but our physics is what got us here in the first place so ...
But tell me you don't find this fascinating, the idea that there is so much more!
@@jackthepumpkinking2434 that sounds much like nowadays gizmos, I highly doubt you would waste tons of energy and resources on the controls... Tesla (and pretty much all of these stuff with elon musk in it) is the best example of what humanity should NOT do. wasting precious time and resources on ideas that only elevate comfort for the rich people is very very stupid, not to mention praising people over wasting those resources, I would not be suprised if that is exactly why they would never even attempt at a contact with us. The day humanity gets rid of the money for the true common good, then everything will be different. Until then, true engineers are on their own and most likely will die poor and alone. a price worth paying for.
This was very interesting. When I was a kid, I had a plastic model of Bob Lazar's alien saucer craft. I was fascinated by his description of the gravity amplifier system, even if I didn't completely understand it. This presentation of yours helped me understand the idea much better. Well done!
Yes but he claims he made no money ! Oh but testers can make his model give me a break
He made zero money. Someone took his description and made those model kits without his involvement. He is a fairly high-level scientist anyways. He makes damn good money at his job.
If it does nothing else i gives kids a boost to dream of being better things down the road for there's nothing better than a great science fiction story to get the mind to open up to all possibilities?
Bob explained in one of his interviews that there's a gravity "a" and "b" wave bound in the nucleus of that isotope of 115, and when the particle accelerator was active, it would consume the 115 by accelerating nuclei into the triangular milled/machined piece of 115, causing a decay reaction in which the 115 would decay into daughter products releasing the gravity waves that the amplifiers use. The remaining reaction products were said to be consumed by a 100% efficient thermionic generator (i.e. all radiation was converted to an electric field) - very interesting stuff.
We've made many isotopes with 115 protons, they all have a half life of less than 1 second. And the US agreed to it being named Moscovium. If the US really thought this element was so important it's strange they'd be fine with it being named after the capital of its major rival.
Prepare the Dilithium Crystals
@@Treblaineit was first discovered in Russia..
Is that a forbidden chapter in Alice in Wonderland? What a load!
@@Treblaine The US would have never come out and reveal it on their own. Russia 'discovered' it and went public with it so they get to name it. If it wasn't for Bob Lazar, they'd have no idea that it could made into a stable isotope that has the ability to be modulated to discharge gravity waves. The fact that the US didn't come out with it says it all. The US leads the world in science (hard to believe sometimes).
Alien: “What?! You lost a sortie craft?! Great! Now the whole planet is gonna learn about us! We’re fucked!”
Alien2: “Actually it seems the government of the location where it was lost is keeping it hidden and secret, even from themselves.”
Alien: “Fuck this is a stupid species... delay our planned physical contact another 100 years.”
Would have been a lot funnier - without the vulgarity.
100 years later:
Alien: "So, did you send our message to the earthlings, that we will destroy their planet if they don't change their ways?!"
Alien2: "I did. They're calling it "Dubstep" and dance to it..."
@@bc-guy852 or it's funny regardless.
Crosses unknown light years of intergalactic space, avoids relativistic collisions and hard radiation, then runs it into the dirt. Some little green guy is getting a letter in his file.
@@plexus Eric, your inability to communicate effectively illustrates your low intelligence or mental deficiencies, perhaps from substance abuse or environmental concerns. If present conditions persist - I suggest you seek help. Thankfully, there are other quality minds we can count on, for valued insight and introspection moving forward.
Jake, as much as I enjoy this topic, I love the fact that you talked about it, in the easy freeflowing layperson's way that you do, and the sensible logical approach you're doing it. I've already enjoyed your Ukraine/war videos, and came to your channel for that, but now stay for knowing you've got a diverse range of subjects covered to enjoy.
I completely agree. I found this channel around 9 months ago for the videos discussing the Ukrainian/Russian war. I've been a regular viewer ever since but I also really enjoy interesting videos like this from time to time. 👍
I would tell Einstein to quit stealing Henri Poincare's work on C2. Plagiarizing and lying is not cool Einstein.
@@magnitudematrix2653 The old man's dead leave him alone.
Jake, that was a masterclass in explaining complex ideas in a simplistic way. You are much closer to true than many now realize.Sometimes you clays make me so happy - thanks for that! 🙂
One of the more interesting things about how Bob explained the means of propulsion of these crafts are that these crafts uses an Anti Matter reactor using Element 115 and it basically bends space in front of it to "propel" itself forward. He said this in an interview in the late 1980s. Then a few years later (1994) a Theoretical Physicist named Miguel Alcubierre proposes a speculative warp drive Idea almost word for word of what Bob was talking about. Bending space Infront of the craft using exotic matter as a fuel source.
to be 100% fair, Alcubierre devised the equations as a fun experiment to see if he could solve the solution to the warp drive engines in the StarTrek show he was a fan of...
he didn't propose a speculative warp dive idea, he sat down to find out if the math said warp engines were yay or nay.
Alcubierre also discovered that this technology was, in fact, impossible to produce as the energy necessary to bend the space-time a significant amount is higher than the energy contained in the whole universe
@perseus274 Erm..... no.
@perseus274 Gravity is not a "polar" force in that way, and if it did, the craft wouldn't levitate, it'd go flying towards the attractive pole, just like in magnetism.
Antimatter has positive mass, as shown recently, (in an experiment which took a LOT of people to perform, so no "its fake" nonsense,) and thus, can't be used in an Alcubierre drive.
Jake, thank you. I've been watching your Ukraine coverage for about 8 or 9 months, and I consider your opinion to be substanciated and therefor valuable.
You back your opinion with numbers, and you explain the source of your numbers. GLORY BE !!! You give a reference to sources.
Jake, referencing your sources is rare in this day and age. I thank you and sincerely appriecate you and your work, ... I sense honesty, a true rarity.
John Boach
His financial stuff is good too. 👍
Ive been abducted by aliens and i need help
@@kmlumd44 how?
@@kmlumd44You ok buddy? What happened?
Gravity waves were known since the 1920's. Gravity wave detectors were built recently, but Relativity predicted they would exist 100 years ago. Bob Liezar had nothing to do with any of that. He's just repeating what his Sophomore physics prof told him.
He never said he had anything to do with it re: gravity. What are you talking about?
@@AnunnakiAaron 23:23 Einstein had theorized gravitational waves way back in 1916.
He says Lazar had talked about them "30 years ago" in a way that feels boastful in its supposed prescient quality. So why not try 99 years ago with Einstein's prediction, wherein the properties and behavior of the collision of two massive objects whether they are neutron stars, black holes, etc, the waveform signatures identifying what kind, mass, rotational speed as well as velocity in their reference frame, matched incredibly closely to what would eventually be observed, making the identification of what event had indeed caused the disturbance in spacetime propagating such gravitational waves matching the predicted model.
The tick tack flies just like Lazar said they flew. Bobs rendition becomes more likely every passing year.
The Tik Tak “flies” like a weather balloon. The data indicates it was blown by the wind, the story from the pilot is obviously embellished after the fact because he adds details that were not available at the time. The fact that they had the capability to visually record it, and didn’t, is problematic for trusting the often retold story.
@@jeffersonian000 Scott, you come off as one of those people that, if a saucer landed on your house, and little grey men slid down your chimney, you would tell yourself they were part of Orkin spraying for termites, or Santa's little helpers, before you would ever admit the possibility that we are not alone in the universe. Open your mind bruh....
@@jeffersonian000 watch the female jet fighter pilot’s analysis on Wired (UA-cam channel). She will disagree with you regarding its speed, behaviour and pretty much everything. Eye opening short video.
@@jeffersonian000 That de-bunking depends on an analysis from a guy who's never used that equipment being better at it than trained observer fighter pilots with hundreds or thousands of hours worth of experience. Pass.
@@queenlaqueefaall-in2428
1st off, it when need to actually happen. Given that most “close encounters” can be attributed to sleep paralysis and the tendency of our brains to rewrite memories to solve problems, such as why you can’t move and it feels like someone is sitting on your chest or watching you or carrying you.
And 2nd, it would actually have to happen.
I have researched all those lines for years just out of curiosity..... I keep on open mind. Your logic is spot on. The implications- solid. Hats off brother! No way I can disagree to any part this.. Fabulous job! Keep em flowing..
Dear Jake. I remember that cursed 24th February when I got you in my feed for the first time. Since then your updates are part of my household's coffee routine. Watching this two years later I could state that you are friend of logic, defender of democracy and an honest, diligent guy that anyone would be glad to have as a friend.
Why do you say cursed? Just kidding, right?
Thank you Jake for making this insightful video presentation. It’s exciting to think about the possibilities that future technologies may bring us. It’s cool to see someone working into the science of ufo.
Saw you're post today on UFO's and went back to watch what I missed before I found you. Interesting but I will reserve judgement till I see it! Keep up the good work, interesting
It's been said that this universe isn't stranger than we imagine, but stranger than we can imagaine ! Keep striving toward the unknown and the unknown may just find you … Good work, Jake !! Keep it up !
Great video. Nice to see someone play around with these ideas instead of arguing over if it's true or not. Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. Instead of arguing, try playing around with ideas and see if any of it makes sense. First video I've seen in a long time that adds to the conversation instead of yelling back and forth over individual beliefs.
Thanks Mrbig! Could be real, could be pure science fiction! Still fun to consider and think about!
the universe is simply too young to have this occur anywhere else in nature. It is more plausible that quadrillions of years into the future, after 100's if not 1000's of generations of stars like our own, have lived, died, and "spilled their guts" as he says, so that heavier elements can be forged, can this be a reality. Unless we are in a "pocket" universe, where our universe is "younger" than where the aliens come from, this is simply nonsense.
I do the same with Gandalf Magic Wand. If i beleive very very very strong maybe someday.....LOL😅
Since 30 Years he live from this fairytail.....why he should stop when its soooo easy to be surrounded by gullibles.....why?
He is not the Idiot in the room, so much its clear...😊 not he....
That's a fun sketch of the Jupiter II that Lazar drew. Must be a fan of the 1960s Lost In Space show from CBS.
Out of everything I’ve heard, bob lazar sticks out much more than any other source. In an emotional level too.
U don't find anything he says sus ? ..
@@_RasputinReborn_ no. Why would it be sus? Also there’s no credible sources that we can really rely on..
This was so entertaining and interresting. I believe having this kind of thought experiments can accidentelly result in real discoverys 😊 Thanks for a fun moment!
One of the saucers was actually from an archaeological dig, according to Lazar.
imagine aliens crossing vast interstellar distances in incomprehensible tech, but they crash into earth
@@numbersix9468Imagine people driving vast distances at speeds unimaginable to animals, only to crash on an empty highway. Sh!t happens.
The reason that even numbered elements are more abundant is they're more stable, it's called the Oddo Harkins rule.
I assume hydrogen is the most abundant because also being the simplest (a proton that found an electron)?
Thanks fella
What I found interesting the most is that everything that Bob Lazar mentioned 30 years ago (which sounded ridiculous or improbable back then) has been discovered since the , element 115, gravitational waves and so on... Definitely adds credibility in my eyes.
Eh, he is lying. Guy cant properly explain what he is studying yet
@@mattk8810 everything lazar claimed 30 years ago has came to fruition.
@@craigmcguire6573I didn't really believe lazars story for the first few years after joes podcast came out. But seeing the craft fly belly first is hard to predict. And people say " We already knew they fly belly first" You can't find 1 single article claiming that before 1989. It literally doesn't exist
@@mattk8810I think he claimed to only work their for 6 months. And likely if there is truth to it, it’s far beyond our understanding and we only know limited info about the craft. I could imagine how primitive our technology is to a civilization far older than ours. I don’t know if bob is lying but I do believe we’re not alone in the universe.
@@craigmcguire6573- you do realize that 115 was theorized in the 1950s don't you? Lazar did not predict it, it had already been predicted for 30 years.
Excellent video Jake - many thanks for creating it and sharing 👍
Growing up in Las Vegas knowing Area 51 was not far was interesting. I grew up seeing George Knapp's UFO reports on the news. I'm glad he did those; it really helped destigmatize the topic. 🛸✴🤩
🛸
Area 51 is boring
The comments here are from many reputed scientists.
Im in awe.
It should be.
Love the passion, great explanation, great video. A lot more people need to see this video. Especially with what’s going on with David crush and the congressional hearings.
Well done man! 👍
Very informative and enjoyable!
This is one of the best videos and explanations on Bob Lazar's Element 115 I've seen yet. Thank you. Would love to see more.
I have more planned after the Congressional report comes out on June 25!
@@JakeBroe I'll be looking forward to it!
I’d love to see you and Bob have a discussion on this. I think it would be fascinating.
Why not. Would certainly be a change of pace.
Assuming that Bob is telling the truth, he still wouldn't be able to add much to such a conversation. His background is in engineering more than in theoretical physics.
@@brianm2881 Killjoy...
Rogan interview bob a while back. It’s a great interview.
@@brianm2881 he actually had a conversation with a physicist on artbell radio back in 1990s bob lazar definitely knows a lot about physics
Facts! These stupid "documentaries" add weird music, stupid transitions and effects makes Bob Lazar stories look crazy.
Make a proper documentary.
When George Knapp said it all depends on how Bob is if the planets are align and it's a blue moon horseshit cringe AF and let's not forget creepy voice Mickey Rourke sounds like he's talking inward n not outward 😂😂
Thank you for taking Bob seriously! I was apprehensive watching this show since there is so much ignorance out there (even with the internet) happy to say I was pleasantly surprised. There is a youtube video on Bob's body language and the results were POSITIVE, he was telling the truth as he knows it to be.
There is no reason to take Bob Lazar seriously. And the nails in the coffin of Lazar's ridiculous story are made of element 115.
@@nexpro6985 Isotopes of 115 can be stable do some research!
Bob is lying about his credentials (about having attended MIT and Caltech). That reason alone shows he's (very likely) to be full of crap
@@clausbohm9807 There are no stable isotopes of element 115.
Do some research.
@@clausbohm9807GET OFF
What doesn't add up to me re the Jo Rogan interview: He mentioned they were only allowed to work in isolation on each element in two's, but then they all gathered while some of them took it for a 'joy ride' around the car park. Seems 'that' bit would be the most secret of all ! & How would they know how to control the thing ...
Not to mention Bob said there's no control switches, levers, gauges or buttons. He also said the only way to activate the anti gravity device is to place the sphere onto the square box. Once active it would repell your hands away so you couldn't touch it. How did they turn it off? He also stated that when in flight, it was invisible from directly underneath. Would those in charge allow their staff to stand under an alien craft in flight. I could go on and point out around another 30 or so points that point to Bob being a complete fraud.
@@robertmorris4784 exactly 💯👏. Much though I'd really love this all to be true, it just doesn't add up. I'm also sceptical of the recent Congress event. The speaker running it seems a bit of a hill Billy 'yo-ll' and I'm not sure whether Grush is out for his 15mins of fame... 🇬🇧
@@doverivermedia3937 Yeah, what a pantomime
I am pretty sure that's not what was said. Considering he was on the crafts propulsion division it would make sense for them to need to see the reactor in operation. Also regarding the controls there has been speculation it may be an advanced form of direct control from the brain. Like neuralink but more advanced than that. As in you don't need the chip in your brain to operate it. Considering the body nervous system operates on electrical synapses it's not impossible. We just haven't got there yet. But the idea that a technology like that couldn't exist in the future isn't impossible. Just remember one thing when you research this stuff. About 20 or so years ago I can remember the idea of a touch screen device was considered science fiction. Now we have one in everyone's pocket. The idea that you could control a device with hand gestures was science fiction. Now BMW has that in cars as a gimmick. We have advanced more in the last 80 years since Roswell happened than in the last 1000 years. If what Grusch said about getting our first craft from Italy in the 1930s is correct we may even be able to attribute splitting the atom to that tech. If not it is very coincidental how quickly fiber optics, night vision, and a host of other tech advances became public shortly after Rowsell. A lot of what Bob said has come to be true. I am not going to say whether he is right or wrong but to write him off for the reasons people are listing here is silly. Especially when he was able to show these objects to other people on test nights and it's on tape that he could. No one ever said the government made sense. But when it comes to something like propulsion, it would make more sense. Let's say you took the engine and transmission out of a car and showed it to a scientist from 200 years ago. Do you think they would have any idea what it was even for by only looking at the power source of a vehicles movement? Or do you think they may need to see it operate with the suspension, wheels, driveshaft, axles, etc. To get an understanding of what the engine is even used for? In this case we are talking tech far beyond just a 200 year gap so the idea that just maybe they would think the propulsion guys witnessing how it flies might make sense to get an idea of how it operates in the field.
@@robertmorris4784The sphere in the square box? Sounds like they got the idea from that child's place the shapes toy 😂.
If my teachers spoke and demonstrated as you do, I can't help but think I would of learned whole lot better and more, I'm 51 and threw the way you explained I have gained knowledge and so I thank you .
Well sed...
Now save the world...
@notaclue.663- Your teachers must have been shite.
"...would of..." = would have
"...threw..." = through
Definitely not a clue...
@@davidearea242 Tbat
would have not would of, through not threw. None of this was your teachers' fault.
dilligaf - there's more to teaching than speaking and demonstrating and if you didn't learn in school it was probably more your fault than your teacher's fault
People seem to forget or Passover the fact that bob lazar broke the secrecy of Area 51. Even though there were conspiracy theories and rumours nothing was fact until mr bob, Pop culture/American culture at least owes the man that! P.s Twice mina’s beauty is the real disclosure!
Lol
No he didn't. Bob Lazar has never possessed a security clearance - ever.
@@chuckschillingvideosyour a disinfo agent 😢
@@kevinadamson5768 If anyone is spreading disinformation, it is Bob Lazar and his delusional followers.
I remember years back when I heard Lazar describe that UFO's create a Gravity well, and that they just fall into the well to propel the craft. That made so much sense for me.
In 1953 my Dad had a UFO encounter in Colorado Springs at about 2 AM. Just sitting in the middle of a Country road blocking his travel. What he called three small people outside the craft. Dad came to a stop a couple hundred feet from the Craft. He described the incident for the first time to me in about 1970, Years Later when Lazar sketched out his Sport Model drawing . I realized his Sport Model was what my Dad had described that the UFO he had seen looked like. Dad joked to me that proves even Aliens have to stop along road to take a pee once in a while.
Colorado Springs is in the area of the Air Force Academy and NORAD, other Military bases, also downwind of the NUKE Tests the Military did in the 50's. So the area would have been of interest to Aliens
What's interesting is Lazar's explanation, as you mentioned, implies the vehicle is constantly falling towards a gravitational center, like an object falls to earth. How much acceleration could a body handle fro extended periods of time? My guess would be 3 -4 g's. Acceleration would be limited by the ability of the ship and occupants do not get 'spagettified', like we've seen happen to objects falling into Jupiter. This would explain the very rapid acceleration.
@@j.d.waterhouse4197 Look at Lazars original sketch of the Sport Model. There is a box next to each of the three crew seats. I think Lazar refereed to the Boxes as Amplifiers. I think those three Boxes also put the crew in a gravity bubble that negates the outside acceleration of the craft the craft goes through. So I think the interior occupants do not feel any movement during flight.
@@stevehughes5403 Well, according to Lazar, the ship AND the crew are constantly 'falling' towards the direction they are moving. A gravitational force is somehow created in the direction the occupants want to move (using amounts of energy we are not capable of creating today). Thus there's no need to 'undo' gravity' in the ship -as long as the gravitational force isn't so great as to cause 'spagettization'. This is still a very great force, 3 or 4 g's would be probably safe. Think of how fast a parachutist accelerates when they jump out of an airplane. That's just 1 g. If a ship and crew were all subject to that same force, all would accelerate at the same time, the same as if you were inside a container and dropped from that plane, you would feel nothing. Inside the ship you wouldn't even know you were accelerating.
@@stevehughes5403 A ship (tic tac) that can great a "gravity well" deep enough to make it go from zero to say Mach 50 near the ocean would suck all the water up into it along with the craft.
I'm not trying to be a pedantic jerk, but I have a couple issues:
0. Bob Lazar is not a dumb guy. In-fact, I think he's a very very intelligent guy. But that doesn't mean that he isn't lying for his own vanity/notoriety/financial gain, or nuts. None of those are mutually exclusive. Also, the claims that these UFOs aren't affected by gravity/don't have exhaust plumes/heat signatures etc. has been examined by several people, but thunderf00t's video is a good example of some of the issues that people seem to be overlooking. ua-cam.com/video/VCH7BWGpl5s/v-deo.html
1. You can't say "sci-fi thinking" but then reference real-life science (sometimes incorrectly) and think that is a valid shield for criticism. This is what quantum mystics and woo-peddlers do. They will use science that supports whatever they are trying to sell and either ignore or try to invalidate science that doesn't.
2. You are incorrect about the transuranic elements- for example, there is naturally occurring plutonium in pitchblende. It's likely that elements above uranium existed in the solar nebula (and even on earth) originally but have decayed by the current era because their short half-lives. Read about primordial nuclides if you're interested.
3. I have never heard this binary star system theory for the formation of the earth. I've heard of the Nemesis idea, which the sun had a companion brown dwarf out beyond the Oort cloud (95,000 AU). I don't think it's crazy to think that there might have been a companion star to the sun born in the same nebula, but it's much more likely (especially since we don't see a stellar remnant in our system) that if there was a companion star, one of them was disturbed and pulled away from the binary system while still they were still in their birth cluster.
4. The heaviest elements are now thought to only form in the r-process during neutron star collisions. It looks as though supernova nucleosynthesis doesn't seem to be the primary method for creating the heavier elements as was once thought. This is mainly because the densities are so low after the star blows itself apart. This could of course change with more evidence in the future.
5. If you are creating a gravity well, you're creating an event horizon in front of your ship which will, like a black hole's event horizon, catch all matter at it's edge as you travel through space (gas molecules, micrometeoroids, etc.) and cause it to "freeze" at the horizon until you come to a stop. The "frozen" matter will then be released with all of the energy that it's collected during your travels- likely creating a giant death-beam pointed directly in front of you, wherever you come to a stop at. You're also going to get intense blue shifting of light from in front of your ship which will up shift lower frequency light into gamma rays, meaning make sure you have good eye protection and quite a bit of shielding on the front of your ship- well it doesn't really matter- you're going to get baked by high energy ionizing radiation anyways.
6. We can manufacture element 115, it's just not stable. Moscovium 290 has a half-life of only 650ms. According to what we have predicted based on the "island of stability" , it looks like even Moscovium (Mc 291) still isn't stable. Maybe there is a stable isotope at 292 or 293, but I doubt it. But I also don't think it matters- I don't see any property which was ascribed to the element happening, based on #7 below.
7. Beta decay allows a neutron and proton to convert to each other. You're just changing an up quark into a down quark or vice-versa. This process happens all of the time and I don't see why it would produce any type of gravitational radiation or why it would cause properties not shared (even just partially) by any other element.
For your point number 4, check out the possible explanation for the abundance of heavy elements in Przybylski's star..
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Przybylski%27s_Star
He is in fact lying. His science is not real physics and he was actually convicted of fraud in a brothel ownership scheme in Nevada. All in public record. He also lied about having a physics degree from a university Stanton
Friedman researched and discovered he lied about attending. He is very charming and convincing but most con men have that characteristic. We don't need him. New data is emerging that actually can be explained by physics--that
doesn't mean there isn't a huge wow factor because there is indeed. One being the amounts of energy necessary
to achieve the many mach accelerations observed. Thousands of Giga Watts to begin.
8
Thank you someone that can see the holes in his science!
Yeah this was the best explanation ive heard so far. You might actually be right man...With the Element 115, which could be used to "make" gravitational waves and it not occuring in our solar system at all. It could stop us dead in our tracks. Kinda sad when you know that with current technology, its impossible to get to the nearest stars to potentially obtain it.
Bob described 115 as the fuel, it was under a hemisphere of metal and a flat thick plate that it all set on top of.
115 was a cone shape. I picture the 115 cone shape releasing particles outward but this hemisphere of material directs it either back to the cone, or down to the thick plate of material.
@perseus274 It doesn't need to be irradiated to decay, it does that on its own. It has a half-life of less than a second.
Try storing that in a fuel tank or whatever.
Nicely presented about an incredibly important controversy: if Lazar is legit, every existential construct is suspect; if he is a fraud, why the Area 51 anomalies, and why are there millions of followers. It’s hard to envision where there might be a middle ground.
I've been fascinated by Lazar's story since he first called in to Art Bell's late night radio program and remain fascinated and so appreciate the layman's nuts and bolts explanation which I think is pretty good. Like you I find it an interesting exercise in thinking about how the physical universe might work rather than a rabbit hole into which I have to sink all my attention. Will look forward to exploring more of your vids. Tally ho!
Tall y ho?? English I take it. Hope The 🦊 got clear.
It the best explanation I have ever heard about this topic. Just continue to do your thing man. You are an inspiration to all.
Thanks RT! Cheers!
@@JakeBroe I believe it was stated during the podcast, that the several craft Bob Lazar allegedly witnessed, were said by the personnel to have been unearthed -- not intercepted -- and quite old (can't remember exactly, what the supposed dating was). This interestingly translates to your point about the craft pilots not being able to find the necessary fuel in our system. If the story is true, perhaps our visitors couldn't make it back on the remaining amount... and simply died here -- leaving their vessels to be covered by time. One scouting party after another, they seemingly left a decent collection for us.
The only thing possible here is that it's possible that Bob Lazar is a bullshit artist.
Element 115 ( moscovium) wasn’t on the chart in 1989- although the numbers on the periodic table do go in numeric order
And he got the idea from an article in a science magazine that came out the same month that he came out with his story.
I wish his story was true / but it definitely isn’t.
Jake: *States he isn’t scientist*
Proceeds to state he has a degree in the sciences and speaks in purely science jargon for 30 minutes
Haha, I love science!
@@jeffd.8917 Why did they wipe his existence, this has been proven because there are documents with his name associating him with the school and the company that weren't destroyed
@@jeffd.8917 HAHAHA Yeah, he's lying. That's why there is an extant copy of the Los Alamos National Laboratory Newspaper with Lazar on the cover with a picture of the jet car he built. The paper describes Lazar as an Engineer. HHHMMMMMMM
@@jeffd.8917 its definitely frustrating to accept that he is telling the truth but take into consideration the fbi, cia, nsa issues of talking about the details. And even how it might be possible that scientists/engineers were hand picked and contracted under private terms of conduct. This implies that the project managers handled all the intelligence and core research while the scientists were left in unsurity. Thats what I believe.
Also consider how when asking for data on a certain element at a research lab, that element is sent there to unsuspecting scientists as that is a privately funded task. Those material scientists/researchers would just be observing an element and describing it, as they always do. They wouldnt know why they are doing it and for whom (institutionally) at what insight/reason. Its just the way of the world.
@@jeffd.8917 Jeff, you obviously have not done any research regarding Bob Lazar and it being verified of his employment and employers prior to being contracted by the military to work at S7. Thankfully, other professionals like George Knapp whom has been awarded Numerous journalism awards throughout his 40+ years of reporting. Additionally, multiple ex-coworkers verified Bob’s employment at these world class scientific research and development companies and that Bob was highly skilled at his knowledge of physics. I say all of this not to imply I wholeheartedly agree with his statements because if you had actually watched documentary in addition to multiple interviews he has given over the years, he does not make definitive claims about aliens. The only thing he is and has consistently described in laymen terms, purposely mind you, is the aspect of working on back engineering the propulsion of this UFO’s or UAP’s now. In fact, despite our gov’t doing their best to scrub his credentials they have all been verified. Your lame criticism is Bob in this documentary chose to not use highly technical physics terminology is why you then state as if this is somehow hard evidence, because you are intellectually superior on physics terms to Mr. Lazar, he should be discredited. Jeff, I obviously do not know you but I can use your same logic that you applied to Mr. Lazar to draw a conclusion and apply to you. First you seem like the sort of fella that is confident in your ignorance and furthermore assume because you are so confident in your ignorance you feel compelled to share it with everyone because you assume the rest of us would appreciate if not be downright be thankful to you. I think many that may have wasted their time in reading your post as with many others on a wide range of subject matter would agree with my assessment of your comment and you with humbly asking you to save yourself the embarrassment of showcasing to all your embrace of sharing your ignorance. I’m sure many others would have like to reply to what I can only assume are a multiple of ignorant comments you made many times on social media but simply didn’t want to take the time and effort to reply. I would strongly encourage you Jeff D. to take just a bit more time before you make a comment and ask yourself if it adds anything of value, is what you are going to write well though out and based on fact or if it is just your observation which simply put is an opinion. I’m sure you are not going to like my comment and want to reply fiercely which you certainly have the right to. However, before you do I would encourage you to re-read this reply and implement sound advice I tried to provide to you. Best Wishes, Mr. Lovejoy
Who says the UAP's come from our concept of space and time? They are sometimes an event in the space and time we experience. It doesn't mean they come from another star or galaxy.
Exactly!!
Adding some thoughts to your thought exercise and more questions (1 year later):
8:08. No wires: We can make "chips" and "electronic plates" part of the structural frame. It apparently seems to have no wire because all wiring is "in-bedded" in the structure + the wireless devices you already commented.
13:52. Recent discovery (WEBB telescope) may suggest that there were galaxies much earlier than theory predicted.
What would (all in the conditional, obviously) that mean: 1. Maybe the universe is older? 2. Maybe 90% of the "unknown universe" (dark matter/energy) - influenced by gravity but doesn't bounce EMW (photons) - has some effect on what we observed so far and made the theory of a 13.77 billion y.o universe, maybe a "little older"? 3. Could Mc115 (stable version?) be a sub-product of "dark matter"? 4. If the universe expand at faster than light "celerity" (it's possible because it can expand at a little bit more than 1/2.c then the combined expansion is faster than light) therefore there may exist an "invisible universe" (the part beyond the faster than light speed). I'm not sure if I'm clear enough...
17:56. Next time Mc115 is synthesized we have very little time to find out what is its spectroscopy signature (given it's not a "dark matter" sub-product... In that case, no spectroscopy possible, from what I understand), then try to find where MC115 is in enough quantity at the surface of a star or a planet. If it's in the Zeta Reticulae area, that would make some sense...!
19.01. I was told (according to A.Einstein) that gravity is not a force, but a "deformation" of the universe "fabric" (as a consequence of variations in density and/or speed), therefore we cannot count it as the 4th force (may the 4th be with you!)
21.29: I was told (S. Hawkings) that nothing can escape a black hole EXCEPT Information. Am I correct in my understanding?
26:49. It has been theorized that it could exist a particle responsible for mass (aka "gravitron"?), what if the stable MC115 would be "made" of more "gravitron" than other element (able to create a gravitational field)?
28:59. We have the ability to synthesize MC115 (unstable version). So, maybe, some day can we synthesize a stable version? Nothing is really impossible (from the observer PoV... ;) )
You describe the process so well.
I love learning about this stuff
Jeremy is like a used car salesman
Hahahaha
Reminds me of a late night diet/vitamin infomercial pitchman 🤭 . Edit: Or the odd home shopping knife dude that will include an "authentic medieval fantasy broadsword" if you call now 🤣
I really enjoyed this thought experiment! Seeing the Navy videos somewhat settles the question of "Do these craft exist?" But then we have to ask how they work, and I can't even begin to imagine how they do what they do. Even stranger, I'm starting to think Lazar was being truthful. If that's the case, the universe is a lot weirder than we expected.
I followed Lazar in 89 and throughout the time people were dicrediting him. Then I forgot about it until they announced element 115. Now with the release of the Navy Video's, specifically the gimbel video, it shows a craft doing exactly what Lazar described in 89. He was telling the truth the entire time.
It is obvious he was telling the truth. To me, the big question now is are humans flying around in them now or is it all aliens. They have had the crafts for 70 years now. It is very possible humans could be flying around in them and the navy videos was to test how our military would deal with a vehicle like that. I actually think after watching the interviews of members in the nimitz battle group that its probably humans, at least in that situation. They said that people came on board minutes after the encounters and confiscated all the data. That leads me to believe it was planned or it would have taken much longer for someone to confiscate the data.
@@riftur7636 element 115 was predicted for the first time in 1937 when the electrons per shell preduction were mapped. Creating it and then measuring it just wasn't feasible until moscovium discovery in 2004. It might create gravity but Lazaar just used an already predicted element to back up a flimsy story.
I don't believe him at all. Someone can easily twist known information to bs people that they had a hand in it.
The universe is even weirder than that.
Hey Jake you should do more of these. Hang on haven’t I said that before to you LOL.. no seriously you’re a good teacher and I love listening to you. Much appreciated.
We can learn advanced technology but we can’t learn the raw materials it takes if they don’t exist on our planet, or even in our own solar system.
hi Jake I'v seen many of your videos, but this was the most interesting yet. I hope to see more like this one. Someone said we are at the stage with quantum physics where Newton was when the apple fell on his head. thank you
None of this applies if the phenomenon is actually interdimensional beings.
Are you sure? If one can bend the fabric of space/time, is it not possible to tear it open to reveal another dimension on the other side? Doesn't seem impossible to me, but what do I know?
We (the public) don't know much about the phenomena, so it's hard to say. Personally, I'm hoping they are from other star systems, because the universe is awfully huge and I'd love for humans to be able to explore it one day.
@@quantumac ...granted. But wishful thinking can jade logic.
@@quantumac Absolutely. It's almost terrifying how large our universe is. The idea that there might be multiple (if not unlimited) universes just on the other side of the door is mind melting. I'm just hoping that we get some disclosure before I die. I doubt it will happen with the current state of humanity but one can hope.
Argument from ignorance, teetering on God of the Gaps fallacy. Try again.
This video was better than I thought it would be. Great job researching it.
great stuff Jake, really interesting and you've got a great way of explaining stuff to the uneducated like myself!
Really enjoyed this presentation. Ever since I watched the Lazar interview, I've wondered what the inside of the crafts gravity would be like and whether inertia affected it's occupants. You answered that questions for me, so thanks!
ofc it wouldnt , otherwise they would die
Inertia would not affect someone in a craft that is gravity driven. The gravity would pull uniformly on the ship and its occupants, a bit like free falling. If something like that was possible you could accelerate at 200G, no problem.
Bob Lazar answered these questions as well.
This was great. I'm really glad I found you online. Keep up your great work.
Thanks Jeremiah! I appreciate that!
Wait, 115 could be playing a game of Hot Potato with each other. Where neutrons are getting swaped out constantly. Like it doesnt fit anywhere and is always pushing out 1 where it finds a new home and it generates energy forever.
This video made me subscribe. Lots of luck for you and your channel, Mate!
I loved this brainstorming. This is how technology and science pushes forward.
Thank you.
And you are right, maybe we don’t have that element now, but since there are inter-solar objects, maybe one day we can intercept one.
Thanks Alan! I definitely think within this decade we will be able to identify, track, and intercept an object from outside our solar system and test its composition. I can't wait to see what we find!
@@JakeBroe It's already a reality but it's top secret!
@@JakeBroe this comment gives me hope
@@JakeBroeGravity is NOT a force!! There is no pulling going on between the earth and the moon ! Gravity is simply the warping of spacetime around massive objects ✅
I'm not the smartest guy in the world, but I'm definitely not even remotely close to being the dumbest either. So I understand a lot of this type of science (not talking about element 115, but with the other elements more commonly known) and find it utterly fascinating. However every time I try to either read up on 115 or watch something about it. I either get way to much science and overload lol and end up saying: “screw this, I don't get it." However with this video, you broke it down to where it was not only listenable, but followable in a kinda fun and interesting way. Which to me, is key in learning anything new so for that I say thank you.
Sorry, no. The nuclei in normal matter are already brimming with exchange particles at near light speed and with neutrons too.
Energy itself has gravitational pull, transforming between mass and energy doesn't create extra gravity, going to element 115 won't change that.
I agree... very watchable. I am not too sure what it was I was watching but it was interesting watching whatever it is I just watched! 😂😂
You're absolutely right. Jake frankly admits he's not a scientist, yet he's clearly got that brilliant teaching talent of understanding and then easily explaining all the complicated knowledge in a just amazingly comprehensive way. Just like prof. Alber Einstein once said to other professors: "Genius is making complex ideas simple, NOT making simple ideas complex."
@@piotrang8634 Same guy also said that you shouldn't make things simpler than they are. Ol' Alberts also predicted gravitational waves 100 years ago, which puts Mr. Lazard predicting them 40 years ago kinda in perspective.
@@lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 why are you addressing your opinions to me? I'm not your censor, you can have any opinions you like, no need to send them to anyone for proofreading 🤣
Jake these sketch's appeared in the Eagle comics when I was a kid, I'm 82yrs old now.
Thanks, now we know where Bob got them.
A QUICK Google search will show you that these sketches are NOT the same ones or anything like the ones I'm the eagle comics... But this is the internet so, one person says something and someone immediately believes it at face value smh... Just like what has been done here ⬆️
The Fermi paradox is like looking in a car park puddle and wondering where all the fish are.
I think it is past time to edit us from Mostly Harmless to Mostly Avoid.
INDEED!
Aliens looking at us: "bruh look at these dudes, oh nonono, they burn gasoline from the back of their ships to fly 😂"
It's embarrassing we still burn hydrocarbons for propulsion... we look like savages.
@@JakeBroe imagine how proud aliens are of us when they seen us from caveman to now. They must be looking at us like aww look it’s taking the first steps.
@@addamriley5452 it deals with what we are capable of genetically which is why aliens been standoffish but also been coming out more , humanity is still mastering time, space & matter, but aliens operate a wider range of time, space, and matter. Our biggest problem is energy, an aliens biggest problem is beyond what we can define yet because we are still exploring new stars and galaxies, I feel if aliens are coming out it’s because they are able to see ahead of our time because they literally exist in a different space and can see that we can help them in a future once we advance our intelligence
@@JakeBroe The petroleum industry is strong.
Just a short comment on 10:00 the particle accelerator: a cyclotron is a very common particle accelerator and a relatively simple one. It is around since the 1930s, with the first ones built in Paris and Berkeley. If you read about Operation Epsilon (1943-45) you will find that there have been at least two German ones (Berlin and Heidelberg), the French one in Paris and another one in St. Peterburg.
Yes, a cyclotron is a standard piece of laboratory equipment. It is especially useful for producing photons in every wavelength, through bremsstrahlung
Thank you
The University of Rochester N.Y. had a cyclotron, has been dismantled, the building repurposed. The University had installed a seven million volt cyclotron in Bausch & Lomb in 1936. In 1947 a new 250 million volt cyclotron was installed in a new building on the south edge of the River Campus.
Cyclotron are the basis of most radio therapy machines. They are in widespread use.
When I heard lazar’s explanation of how the antigravity generators were mechanically swung on gimbals to move the craft in a certain direction I thought, “This is absolute BS.” Also, re element 115, an extremely radioactive element which has been named Muscovium: the longest lived isotope 290 has a half-life of only 0.65 seconds. Afaiac he has no credibility.
Thank you that was something different than the usuall commentary on
Jeremy Corbell's Bob Lazar and Area 51 movie.
At last a youtuber who understands the potential of pseudoscience. Subscribed
Awesome! Welcome to the channel snipergh! Great to have you with us!
Wireless charger is a poor example of technology. Nikola Tesla was using induction over a hundred years ago. JS
You'tr explanations helped me understand more about science and physical reality than ever before, in an easy conversational way! Teaching should be like this! Well done! The inertia problem of UAPs was bugging me! Now I have an explanation that makes sense.
This guy just claimed that the symbol “Gd” is called “Gold” and is “one of the most magnetic elements we have” 😂
Thank you for explaining this in terms for the Everyman. Hopefully more people start catching on
I remember a story that he moved his company out of the southwest and the feds raided his new company location not long after….they must think he chipped off a small piece of 115 …or they’re trying to prove a point. Honestly the guy comes off as being an honest person and his story hasn’t changed a bit since he first told it, rather as time progresses its proven to be true at every turn.
Yes, and that piece of Element 115 was given by aliens to the US for experimental purposes.
Mc is highly radioactive the known isotopes decay away in just a few minutes. You would risk severe poisoning carrying it around.
The raid was related to an investigation into the death of someone who ordered a chemical from his store. It had nothing to do with his made-up story. He was convicted of a felony for selling illegal substances.
@@gbennett58 Okay fedboy
I love this scifi fantasy addition to the Bob's story. Good story tellers are a dime a dozen. Good job !
I dare Bob lazar to take a lie detector test. 100 % he'll fail
I agree. He didn't have a migraine headache on Rogans podcast, he was trying to come up with his answers. Buying time.
Lie detectors are a bigger fraud than Lazar himself.
Lazar did take a lie detector test 30 years ago and passed. The polygrapher Terry Tavernetti said he thinks Bob Lazar was being truthful.
Also the Joe rogan interview is 30 years after the events Lazar claimed happened, how much detail do you remember of anything from 30 years ago?
Delta and omicron configuration…..wait, wthF…!!!
I thought the same thing lol
Another brilliant, extremely well expressed, genuinely passionate and intriguing scientific clip. I do also agree personally that Bob Lazar is legit and i quite admire the way he acted.
Bob Lazar has come up with new lies for decades. He's never to be found in one room with an actual physicist.
@@MrCmon113 what (lies) has he come up with exactly? he also probably has been with plenty of scientists/physicists before just not on camera, he also doesnt want to be on camera in the first place since he is enough trouble already.
@@paulhope3401 it's not obvioua that he's lying at all bruh, as bob said, he had no idea how they managed to fly the thing, he was only there to examine the thing, now anyone with a brain understands that they clearly didn't know how it works but it doesn't mean that they can not test fly it, i mean that's the only way to do progress. for instance someone can drive a car without understanding how it works? how is this any different. there is literally more evidence of him saying the truth than him not saying the truth. your'e reasoning for why it is somehow "obvious" that he's lying is soooo pathetic jesus.
@@paulhope3401 well how tho the aliens control it? maybe thats just how it is? it doesnt have wiring why is it so hard to comprehend. they didn't know the exact star system they were only speculating, bob lazar even said that he had no idea how they got the information where they came from ? so why are u blaiming bob for it lol. again there is so much more proof that he's truthful than that he wouldnt be truthful. you make no sense what so ever.... all of this that u wrote is so irrelevant dude.
@@paulhope3401 no? Why would i believe the earth is flat? That has like absolutely nothing To do with this? Also Maybe the aliens are simply so technologically advanced that simply do not need wiring or physical controls that we would understand, thats why u dont believe Bob but cmon man you can not honestly be that ignorant that because one thing doesnt make sense To you u draw the line completely
Thank you very much for your excellent analysis on this subject !!! 😊😊😊
I have been looking for a video like this for 3 years. Thanks!
Jake, correction. The Saucer does not "bump" anything out of the way. According to Lazar, this machine bends space. Therefore, since space itself is bent around the outside of the craft, nothing would hit it since the space it inhabits would curve around the outside of the gravitational field.
To bend space locally it would require more energy than even antimatter can produce.
@@chompchompnomnom4256 key is dark matter
@@UTINNI_36 Key is actually flux capacitors.
@@chompchompnomnom4256 Wow, stop! So you know how space can be bend? Then why you don't build a space bending machine?
@@chompchompnomnom4256 as we are all armchair scientists we can only speculate. We have never created 100% efficient antimatter propulsion system so you are only speculating.....secondly.....Lazar specifically stated that the conversion is done thru a stable version of element 115 inside an exotic form of a cyclotron. There is definitely 0 ways to even speculate on that, so a disbelief in his statement holds as much value as a belief in it.
There are many obvious questions that Bob Lazar’s description brings up. For example:
1. What has antimatter got to do with element 115 and the production of gravity fields? Where does antimatter fit in and how? Where is it stored? In what form is it? Is it used in the reactor?
2. He claims that a working craft had one of the gravity emitters removed and working outside the craft on a bench. This raises 2 immediate questions: a) how was it removed, considering his description of the craft being constructed without parts or seams. Was it cut out somehow? And b) how was it powered since the reactor must still be in the craft in order for the craft to remain functional. So where was the reactor to power the emitter on the bench? And how was it connected up to the bench emitter?
3. Bob describes the propulsion as being derived from the three emitters swivelled into different configurations. But he also mentions a cardioid gravity field created around the craft by the central column. What’s the relationship between these two systems? How does the central column produce the gravity field and what is its purpose, given that the emitters seem to do everything required.
4. Bob describes a pipe that is used to connect the emitter to the ceiling and thus a creates a flexible coupling which allows the 360/180 degree movement of the emitter. He says this was working on the benched emitter but how is this flexing controlled? What is the control mechanism that allows a scientist to operate it on the bench and make it flex? In other words, how do the scientists interact both with the benched emitter - and with the craft control systems, for that matter?
There are so many simple questions like this which Bob’s story raises. I would love to hear his answers.
Yes, it would be useful to ask Bob. Unfortunately Joe Rogan wasted at least 20 minutes during the interview with Bob rambling about monkeys with sticks and stoner philosophy, and Beard Guy wasn't helpful.
1) As I recall, the antimatter was not stored anywhere; it was produced by the E115 under stimulation.
2) It had already been removed when Bob saw it, and compartmentalism required that he was not informed things he did not need to know. I don't remember, were there three reactors (one for each emitter) or only one in the ship?
3) It has something to do with the waveguides that were attached to the reactor. The reactor produced electric power for the rest of the ship in addition to powering the three emitters.
4) I got the idea that you could easily bend it by hand but it was stiff to the forces in the direction of emission.
@@codetech5598 1) So that raises even more questions. What happens to the antimatter? Bob says there was absolutely no waste heat. But antimatter production would result in annihilation with massive gamma ray production from 100% mass-energy conversion. It’s also not clear where the energy to create the antimatter would come from.
2) There was one reactor and three amplifiers, one per emitter. Even if he’d not been there when it was removed, it would surely show signs of cutting if it had been removed that way.
3) The descriptions I’ve seen all sound extremely vague, as though it’s just guesswork and theorising.
4) He explains that it’s used to direct the three emitters. I doubt they’d be doing that by hand, after going down the hatch 😄 Bob also said the pipe solidified “like a weld” once it had bent itself into the required direction.
Every answer prompts further questions, which is good, to get a better understanding of what Bob experienced while working there.
...Or Why he refuses to be interviewed by a physicist.
Or why he gets all his physics wrong.
Or why he Lied about being enrolled in MIT and Caltech.
Or why he couldn't name his advisor for his program...
...Lots of basic questions.
Or we could just accept that Bob Liezar is a disinformation vendor and ignore him. Real scientists are researching real UFO sightings.
@@onebylandtwoifbysearunifby5475 Did Bob ever say that he lived in Massachusetts and attended MIT? I just remember him saying he had classes from MIT which could be anything for example night school sponsored by MIT held at another location, correspondence courses by mail, etc.
@@codetech5598 He has had many version's. In his latest he said was sent to MIT for the military on a secret project (JRE podcast).. MIT has no night school for physics, certainty not for advanced courses, and internet courses didn't exist.
He claimed the government wiped out his records, yet nobody at MIT ever saw him. (And his story keeps changing).
Boy, if you only heard Lazar on Art Bell's Coast to Coast with Art Bell. Bob was on several times and became close with Art and trusted him. Those multi-hour shows were the best of Bob Lazar.
Well done Jake this was a great vid thanks!
Lazar has explained that the "Cyclotron" like device in the craft's power source reactor accelerates Protons which are used to bombard the Element 115 "fuel" similarly to known Fission nuclear reactions where Neutrons bombard atoms, in particular heavy elements such as Uranium to make them split releasing energy.
Anti hydrogen is created by anti proton striking E115 (after some kind of mass reduction of a slightly heavier element)
My guess? Hyper static electro field charge generator. Look at me sounding as if I could actually build this sh......t
Problem is moscovium is highly radioactive and bombarding any highly radioactive heavy metal with protons or neutrons is only going to make it a lot more radioactive and with they way he explained it you would require heavy dense metals like lead or tungsten for shielding. Have you seen the shielding around the Large Hadron Collider which is a huge cyclotron just stretched out across 2 different countries boarders or even a submarine nuclear reactor (not a cyclotron but highly radioactive) with the tons and tons of tungsten and lead shielding plus water for shielding and cooling. I’m not so sure if I believe him but if it was true then what they had was not moscovium aka element 115 and I think they called it element 115 because they didn’t know what it was because 115 was undiscovered back then so to add to its mystique they just named it element 115. If it is real and they do have this fuel then it’s probably an artificially made material as I think aliens that advanced would not be mining for a fuel source wether if it is found in their part of the galaxy or not plus moscovium has a half life of a few milliseconds and all projected isotopes have a short half life of milliseconds so they probably is not a stable isotope that they could mine not that they would mine anything with their hyper advanced intellect and technology. Plus how would Lazar know that it was mined ? Has he spoke to an alien did they tell him this ? He said he had not met the crafts makers 🤔
@@jamesstephenson2644 I don't remember Lazar stating Anti Protons bombarded the 115 to precipitate some kind of proton induced fission of the element 115, he has stated once a proton bombards the element 115 an "A wave" emission occurs along with an emission of other radiation including I believe an Anti Proton which is annihilated with possibly atmospheric gas then utilizing the resulting energy being induced into essentially, as Lazar describes, what appears to be a 100% efficient thermionic generator.
Lazar is a lying fool, as Element 115, called Moscovium, was synthesized in 2003. It's most stable isotope has a half life of 0.63 seconds. See, con man Lazar used element 115 in his lies, because it wasn't yet made, and was TOO DUMB to know all physicists predicted a tiny half life, rendering unusable for "fuel". Hence, humans don't use it.
Bob is full of BS, and ignorance of science.
@@kennethc2466 my point exactly as I mentioned above. He also tripped him self up when he said they mined it because it was stable where they are from but also said that he had never met the crafts inhabitants so how did he know it was mined ?, presumably they would have to tell him this. His story is so full of holes it wouldn’t hold water. What would a hyper intelligent entity be doing mining lmao, he also never produced his PHD certificate on many occasions when asked to. If this secret was real and he divulged it then it’s tantamount to treason because anyone that has a lawful security clearance has it for life even when they retire like Luis Elazondo so they can divulge nothing and have to take all of the secrets to the grave……
Insanely well done thought experiment. The idea that we are missing the tech, because we are missing an element that could be abundant in another solar system, is super plausible.
Lol and why is it "super plausible"? You're just making stuff up.
@@punkypinko2965 Yeah, you're dumber than a damn bag of hammers, kid. If you didn't comprehend what he said, that's on you.
I agree. He's possibly on to something with that. It's absolutely plausible and kind blows the mind to consider it.
actually its not at all. We would be able to "see" heavier elements like element 115 in other stars with our telescopes using spectroscopy. Its nonsense that "element 115" possibly "occurs in a different part of the universe" .. It might one day exist, a quadrillion years into the future, after 100 generations of stars have been able to live and die and collapse on each other, but the universe, at 13.5 billion years of age, is simply too young to have this be a reality.
@@punkypinko2965 do you know what plausible means? doesn’t mean “likely,” it’s just leaving it up to future knowledge
Really interesting ! ..your knowledge knows no bounds !!
You made complex ideas easy to follow! Great video! Entertaining and informative.