Science of Bob Lazar's Element 115 Explored

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 сер 2024
  • Bob Lazar has captured the imaginations of skeptics who question if we are alone in the universe and if extraterrestrial life has visited Earth. Recently he appeared on the Joe Rogan podcast and agreed to allow film maker Jeremy Corbell to make the NetFlix documentary Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers. In this video we will analyze some of his incredible claims.
    💯 LET’S CONNECT 💯
    🐦 Twitter @Broe_Jake 👉 / broe_jake
    📷 Instagram @JakeBroe 👉 / jakebroe
    🔔 Become a channel member 🔔
    Best way to support me: 🌟 🎓 👑
    / @jakebroe
    Buy Me a Coffee ☕️
    www.buymeacoffee.com/jakebroe
    My Patreon Page:
    / jakebroe
    You can also support me with PayPal:
    🔥 Find me: jakebroeyt@gmail.com
    🔥 paypal.me/JakeBroeYT
    👇 👇 Watch My Other Videos Here 👇 👇
    ★ Science of Bob Lazar's UFO Explored
    • Science of Bob Lazar's...
    ★ Science of Bob Lazar's Water Powered Car Explored
    • Science of Bob Lazar's...
    ★ My Reaction to UFOs Confirmed by DoD
    • UFOs Confirmed REAL by...
    ================
    UFOs and Area 51: The Bob Lazar Video and Excerpts from The Government Bible is currently available on Amazon Prime! You might also be able to find it somewhere on UA-cam unofficially.
    Joe Rogan Experience 1315 - Bob Lazar & Jeremy Corbell
    • Joe Rogan Experience #...
    Bob Lazar: Area 51 & Flying Saucers (available on Netflix)
    www.imdb.com/title/tt9107368/
    Navy pilots describe encounters with UFOs
    • Navy pilots describe e...
    Navy pilots recall “unsettling” 2004 UAP sighting
    • Navy pilots recall “un...
    ================
    #UAP #Element115 #BobLazar
    ================
    DISCLAIMER:
    This video is for entertainment purposes only. I am not in any way acting as an agent or representative of the Department of Defense or United States Federal Government when presenting this information. I am not a legal or financial expert or have any authority to give legal or financial advice. While all the information in this video is believed to be accurate at the time of its recording, realize this channel and its author makes no express warranty as to the completeness or accuracy, nor can it accept responsibility for errors appearing in this video.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4,3 тис.

  • @JakeBroe
    @JakeBroe  3 роки тому +246

    Thanks for watching everyone! If you found this video interesting, then give this video a LIKE to let me know and leave a separate comment down below giving me your thoughts on Bob Lazar's story!

    • @daverhin5975
      @daverhin5975 3 роки тому +4

      @@bretbishop1048 Yea but we were probably a binary star system a long time ago our other star blowing up is why we have heavy elements, to begin with. Scientists believe every solar system probably had 2 stars at one time so they would have to come here to check. They would never know how supernova our other star went without checking. You are just misunderstanding the star has to blow up to get the elements. just cause you only have 1 star don't mean you don't have the heavier elements

    • @tinabates542
      @tinabates542 3 роки тому +11

      Full of lies

    • @richardv9648
      @richardv9648 3 роки тому

      So basically what you are saying is that we will never get a chance to hold a piece of element 115 in our hands.

    • @matzeMats
      @matzeMats 3 роки тому +6

      @@tinabates542 Lies would mean Jake hiding the truth. But Jake explicit telling in the video that the content is sience fiction. So, nothing to lie about. Only speculations and of course fiction.

    • @matzeMats
      @matzeMats 3 роки тому +2

      Thank you for your UAP videos. Phantastic ideas, great explanations and research.

  • @alandavidson8311
    @alandavidson8311 3 роки тому +207

    Hey there Jake! You criticized Bob for using incorrect terminology. Fair enough. However, at 15:50 you say our star will go supernova. Our star is not nearly large enough to go supernova. Wrong terminology is not nearly as bad as wrong information.

    • @dansch19
      @dansch19 3 роки тому +39

      @Junior4101 He should be called out on this. It's nothing personal. I could forgive someone a slip up of that magnitude, even, if they didn't dedicate the beginning of their video to not doing the same for a smaller infraction.

    • @doncappo1509
      @doncappo1509 3 роки тому +6

      Haha got em

    • @ElonizuMuskamoto
      @ElonizuMuskamoto 3 роки тому +3

      True, nevertheless a great video

    • @LordTetsuoShima
      @LordTetsuoShima 3 роки тому +13

      Correct. Our Star will become a white dwarf in ~5BY. After engulfing most of the inner planets the "goldilocks" zone will extend to the reach of Jupiter's satellites. This could potentially thaw Europa/Ganymede/Callisto enough for liquid water to be exist on the surface.
      Any Cowboy Bebop fans?

    • @shinzantetsu
      @shinzantetsu 3 роки тому +3

      @@LordTetsuoShima great anime

  • @glenben92
    @glenben92 2 роки тому +184

    great to see someone who's willing to openly and scientifically speculate on the subject

    • @dopedrums
      @dopedrums 2 роки тому +10

      Are you serious? He's basing everything on "because we haven't been invaded yet therefore it's all BS".

    • @jwm6314
      @jwm6314 2 роки тому +10

      ​@@dopedrums That's not at all what the video says.
      I understand that not everyone has the same reading comprehension skills, but it's a freaking video.

    • @dopedrums
      @dopedrums 2 роки тому +2

      @@jwm6314 That's exactly what he says in the video, repeatedly, as the backbone of his thesis. But I must admit, I stopped watching after he did it a third time and wrapped it up as another lazy "debunker".
      Oh, Your personal insults just makes you look weak and dumb. Try to be better or at least shoot me down with facts or something.. 🙄

    • @samboy121
      @samboy121 2 роки тому +3

      @@dopedrums perhaps you should watch the whole video before commenting my friend...

    • @hastyhd5040
      @hastyhd5040 2 роки тому +2

      @@dopedrums man. You need to listen better or something, missed almost every element of the video.

  • @laurancedoyle4231
    @laurancedoyle4231 Рік тому +22

    Hi Jake! I always enjoy and appreciate your videos! This one was closer to my field (I'm an astronomer at the SETI Institute). Life in the Galaxy - where is everybody? is known as the "Fermi Paradox." One comment on our Sun - it is not massive enough to supernova, so will not make any elements heavier than oxygen. But fairly recently (from gravity wave detector science) it looks like neutron star mergers may make even more heavy elements than supernova of large mass stars. Thanks!

    • @ILLUMINATED-1
      @ILLUMINATED-1 Рік тому +1

      @@davidmusial1611 the merger itself ejects a decent amount of material, even without nova

    • @davidrush4908
      @davidrush4908 Рік тому +1

      I read somewhere that astronomers have seen the spectral signature of plutonium in supernova, but that it doesn't occur on earth busause the half life is too short.
      I have always wondered if astronomers have seen the signatures of other trans-uranic or unknown elements.

  • @Jyiber
    @Jyiber 2 роки тому +17

    Another interesting thought about a hard filter on any civilization's capacity to grow is the decay rate of all matter that exists, even the most stable isotopes have a half life and it could be the higher technologies and material sciences might not be achievable unless you have access to a freshly forged solar system before the higher elements all break down in the first few million or even thousands of years.

  • @gorillachronicles
    @gorillachronicles 3 роки тому +173

    Explain why they wiped his career and education,there's newspaper clips of him being affiliated with his school but they now deny he went there,seems pretty weird to me

    • @razeezar
      @razeezar 3 роки тому +23

      As far as I am aware, the only evidence is that he once worked at Los Alamos - Though to what capacity exactly hasn't been exactly verified afaik. Was he a lab hand? A janitor?
      Just about everything else is anecdotal.

    • @jpcairney85
      @jpcairney85 3 роки тому +15

      @@razeezar I would hardly say it was "anecdotal" he & Jeremy Corbel where definitely able to back more than one anecdotal claim.... I'm not necessarily saying I fully believe Bob, but he was definitely more than a Junior at Los Alamos...

    • @razeezar
      @razeezar 3 роки тому +8

      @@johnboze It would be interesting to see citations / references to some of the statements in your post.
      The way Moscovium (element 115) has been produced is by bombarding Americium-243 atoms with Calcium-48 ions.

    • @KuroSlick
      @KuroSlick 2 роки тому +22

      @@razeezar Yes he was a janitor that happened to magically make a rocket car lol

    • @joeyyc8515
      @joeyyc8515 2 роки тому +17

      @@razeezar his job was to check radiation on I.D badges; he was a temp-worker, which allowed him to be in the public registry at Los Alamos.

  • @NoFateButWhatWeMake
    @NoFateButWhatWeMake 3 роки тому +110

    I think what you're missing can be boiled down to two words. Flux Capacitor.

    • @gregorysagegreene
      @gregorysagegreene 3 роки тому +2

      I thought it was Toilet Bowl.

    • @tntnyny
      @tntnyny 3 роки тому +1

      Ha! Love it. What about a hot cup of tea?

    • @andykod77
      @andykod77 3 роки тому

      Ha ha lol too true

    • @andykod77
      @andykod77 3 роки тому +1

      Thats what makes time travel possible right?

    • @vividvulpe9842
      @vividvulpe9842 3 роки тому +5

      Flux capacitor and weed ayyyyeee

  • @garrytuohy9267
    @garrytuohy9267 2 роки тому +55

    Interesting perspective. I hadn't considered that the heavier elements could be naturally occuring in older solar systems.

    • @encryptton3784
      @encryptton3784 2 роки тому +4

      Every element that we can create, can be created by nature itself, as not all elements are in all solar systems thats a fact.

    • @shaqman8649
      @shaqman8649 2 роки тому +7

      @@encryptton3784 much like how many galaxies away, there can be planet sized deposits of gold (or any element)

    • @tavarii6181
      @tavarii6181 2 роки тому

      @@shaqman8649 great example. I've heard this is the planet in our solar system with the heavy gold deposits.

    • @arifsaifee4146
      @arifsaifee4146 10 місяців тому

      Yeah. The thing is the solar system is unusual in that it has only 1 star. Most star systems are binary comprising of 2 stars - sometimes even three as is the case with Proxima Centauri. Maybe in some of these systems element 115 somehow exists in a stable form. Or, as he explained in the Joe Rogan podcast, we synthetically made this element only recently (which decays in 0.65 seconds). Maybe in the future we might learn how to create its stable isotope.

  • @Nobody_114
    @Nobody_114 Рік тому +11

    Hi Jake, I have been following Bob Lazar since he made his first interview on TV. What I recall is he said that the matter/anti-matter reaction doesn't just produce electricity, but also produces the gravitational waves, which are then amplified by the gravitational amplifiers.

    • @robheusd
      @robheusd Рік тому

      Conversion from heat to electrictry can never be 100%, the second law of thermodynamic puts a theoretical limit to this conversion depending on the temperatur difference.

    • @Nobody_114
      @Nobody_114 Рік тому

      @@robheusd True, but Bob mentions that the devices produces electricity directly from the reaction, and does not convert the heat to electricity :o)

    • @robheusd
      @robheusd Рік тому

      @@Nobody_114 So the annihilation of matter and anti-matter supposedly produces electricty directly with 100% efficiency???? Care to explain how that is supposed to work?

    • @Nobody_114
      @Nobody_114 Рік тому

      @@robheusd I don't know. Ask Bob Lazar. I'm just telling you what he said. It's probably a by-product of the anti-mater reaction with the emission of Alpha or Beta particles.

    • @robheusd
      @robheusd Рік тому

      @@Nobody_114 It's science fiction, not real science. This whole UFO/UAP thing is a scam, a distraction campaign. We as a species have been seeing things that are natural phenomena and interpreted them as super natural, invented Gods and even sacrificed people for pleasing the Gods. This whole UFO phenomena is in that respect nothing knew and nothing out of the ordinary. The first telescopes that looked at Mars saw canals, and we thought there were Martians. But better telescopes showed us there were no canals on Mars. We never see clear pictures of UFOUAP's, it's always something vague, and many of the phenomena we see can be explaind by and reproduces by camera settings, causing ordinary objects to look like something else.

  • @Neal_White_III
    @Neal_White_III 3 роки тому +22

    A stable isotope of element 115 is plausible. It's in the region known as the "island of stability". I don't think this was known back when Bob was originally interviewed. For info see: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Island_of_stability

    • @armandomercado2248
      @armandomercado2248 3 роки тому +8

      "Island of stability" was first coined in the late 1960's.

    • @mikolasinyuk8298
      @mikolasinyuk8298 3 роки тому +1

      Agree 👍

    • @razeezar
      @razeezar 3 роки тому +9

      115 falls within this "Island of Stability" which has been predicted (and yet to be proven) well before Lazar came along with his story. Even if physicists discover just one stable isotope in this region and it happens to be 115 in particular, then it will be just an educated "lucky" guess out of a handful of candidate elements.
      Of course, even if it were to be 116 or 117 which was discovered to have a stable isotope in the future, the Lazar sycophants will still claim that this is proof that Lazar was telling the truth all along!

  • @ffrich34
    @ffrich34 2 роки тому +25

    The gravity amplifiers don’t propel the craft. It “pulls” the craft forward by creating a distortion in front and around it. It doesn’t use propulsion the way we do such as a discharge out the back.

    • @jimbaker5110
      @jimbaker5110 2 роки тому +5

      Correct. The gravity amplifiers are “amplifying” the strong force being created n the nucleus of atoms of heavier stable element 115 - supposedly this strong force (when amplified) around the craft distorts space time similarly to the way gravity creates wave ripples in space time or bends space time (as our sun does).
      So getting from point A to point B (no matter how far away in the universe) is achieved by the strong force folding space time from the space craft to that destination point pulling it along.

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 2 роки тому

      @@jimbaker5110 They don't do any such thing. The strong force doesn't warp space time.

    • @jimbaker5110
      @jimbaker5110 2 роки тому

      @@peppermintgal4302 Yea I’ll believe smart people and Bob Lazar over you…thanks.

    • @Emperorhirohito19272
      @Emperorhirohito19272 2 роки тому

      @@jimbaker5110 yeah smart people AND Bob lazar, because he’s clearly not a part of that group

    • @danielbryce6072
      @danielbryce6072 2 роки тому +1

      ProPULLsion

  • @miasue8294
    @miasue8294 Рік тому +1

    Love it, Jake ! 😉👍🏻 Thx for all your marvelous content! 👏🏻

  • @kw1213
    @kw1213 Рік тому +15

    Hearing Bob made me realize for the first time that other alien civilizations might in fact not be that much more intelligent than we are but simply have access to materials that we don't. Our own progress at higher levels of evolution might fundamentally be limited by the availability and or abundance of more complex / dense elements in our vicinity of the galaxy.

    • @juergenernst1320
      @juergenernst1320 Рік тому

      So if they evolved for an additional couple of hundred thousand years if not millions, they didn't make it much past our level? Ask my pap where we were technologically just 100 years ago.

    • @kaylluhb
      @kaylluhb Рік тому

      I haven’t made this realization or thought this process. Thank you, I might go down a different rabbit hole instead of the usual UFO conspiracies or cover ups. The tech angle seems more of a realistic understanding to me. Never got into those rabbit holes

    • @neoqwerty
      @neoqwerty 11 місяців тому

      @@juergenernst1320 TL:DR for convenience; there's a lot of reasons for a civilization to lose knowledge or to stall technologically.
      Ask how long we stayed stalled on human anatomy and medicine because our ancestors were idiots and believed Aristotle and Galen were correct because they spoke well and were good philosophers and lauded as "men of wisdom.
      Maybe the aliens, too, might have had their "THE UTERUS IS A WILD ANIMAL AND YOU NEED TO PUT THINGS BETWEEN A WOMAN'S LEGS SO IT SMELLS IT AND GETS BACK IN ITS PLACE" dumbass who should have stayed in his philosophy lane, but unlike Aristotle, they had the misfortune of theirs deciding to lead their civilization on some wild technological goose chase about...
      I dunno, Scientology or Happy Science "tech" or something useless like that. Spirit telephones or dianetics woo about soul audits.
      We had some REAL embarrassing "how tf were we that stupid" moments in our collective history, and I mean, today we've still got people who think mermaids are real (I met some, it was agonizing, and it was in that mermaid mockumentary by the people who also made that CGI spec evo mockumentary about dragons).
      Imagine if that sort of stellar intellect are the ones controlling this hypothetical alien civilization's research grants or they're as greedy as all the tax-evading swiss-bank-accounts billionaires here on earth.
      I can think of _plenty_ of reasons why another civilization would end up stagnating and "only" be at around our level... and that's just them being their own worst enemies. We lost a bunch of knowledge when the Library of Alexandria burned, we lost a lot more because we just didn't think to write down how we made terra preta or cuir-bouilli, and we nearly lost how to make wootz/damascus steel and pattern-welded steel/the other damascus steel.
      And that's without accounting for any natural disasters that could have wiped out entire chunks of their tech knowledge and history and left no one to remember what was lost to reverse-engineer it...

    • @eliannafreely5725
      @eliannafreely5725 5 місяців тому

      People make that mistake with human history all the time - confusing technology and material culture for intelligence. A couple hundred years ago people had no modern technology, but I'm sure if you went back and talked to someone, you'd find no difference in how "evolved" they were. Likewise, neolithic people were not ignorant brutes, just normal people who didn't always have chairs. So don't worry for our evolution, there is no "higher level" to it. Life evolves to be suited to its environment. We are evolved to be exactly what we are because of where we are and that is what we need, and we continue to evolve to be whatever we become. If we choose to shape that evolution by being more morally consistent - which is what a lot of people are imagining when they think of higher levels of existence - well, we can make that choice literally any time.

  • @robkeil6241
    @robkeil6241 3 роки тому +21

    I think I remember him saying that every part of the project was very compartmentalized?

    • @nobodyhere3164
      @nobodyhere3164 3 роки тому +1

      You are exactly correct. Bob said it was so compartmentalized that anyone even stepping out of the bounds of the areas they were allowed to go into was immediately hauled off by the armed guards ever present and interrogated to find out why they did that and if they were a spy of some kind. As a result, Bob says he doesn't know anything more about the crafts or how the other systems worked.

    • @TheTERMlNAT0R
      @TheTERMlNAT0R 3 роки тому +2

      Right, which would probably explain why he doesn’t know 100% of why or how the craft uses the gravity waves

    • @macioluko9484
      @macioluko9484 3 роки тому

      Yes. Bob mentioned that he was given some briefings to read over after he was hired. These briefings talked about some historical events kept hidden from the masses. Allegedly, the human race had its DNA altered over 40 times by some advanced, foreign race of beings. Also, he read about the fact that we are a form or container for something valuable, without specifying what that something is. Bob acknowledged that every part of the project was very much compartmentalized and because of this, very little progress occurred in trying to back-engineer any of the components of the ship.

    • @nobodyhere3164
      @nobodyhere3164 3 роки тому

      @@johnboze Personally, I would love to learn more of what you know. Not certain how to contact you directly off here so we could communicate.

  • @dropoutdrivez2667
    @dropoutdrivez2667 2 роки тому +108

    I don’t think even bob can explain how everything works. That’s what makes this fascinating

    • @Thorcat001
      @Thorcat001 2 роки тому +7

      right, bob just tells us what he knows, which in the grand scheme is nothing, like us but just a tad more. He didnt try to have all the answers, just what he thinks ... that what makes me believe him.

    • @uytrewq55
      @uytrewq55 Рік тому +5

      This is a Class1 civilization invention. ....millions of years beyond are understanding !

    • @oatlord
      @oatlord Рік тому +2

      Fascinating is one way to describe it

    • @kmlumd44
      @kmlumd44 Рік тому +2

      I wasabducted by aliens over and over and i need help coping

    • @Nosuchthingastrans
      @Nosuchthingastrans Рік тому +3

      @@kmlumd44 You enjoy the probing a little to much..

  • @metgath
    @metgath 2 роки тому +29

    The one issue I could find in your reasoning is that, to our current knowledge, the Sun will not go supernova. It won't even go nova. It is only capable of a red giant stage. That process will spread the lighter outer layers, but the heavier internal will stop fusing and slowly cool. Unfortunately when the sun goes it will be a cosmic whimper.

    • @runs_through_the_forest
      @runs_through_the_forest 2 роки тому

      that's given today's astrophysics is correct.. and i don't think we got near how it all really works, just scratching the surface, more insights are needed away from dark matter/dark energy/black holes/big bang/expanding universe stereotype concepts, and more into exploring EM electrodynamic plasma physics interactions on large scale, only then we will find real answers on questions like what will happen to the sun..

    • @davidtruelove5022
      @davidtruelove5022 2 роки тому

      With our current abilities using high temperature superconducting materials we can create a magnetic force 400,000 greater than the earth’s magnetic field there is no telling how close we could get to making much heavier atoms

    • @tavarii6181
      @tavarii6181 2 роки тому

      @@davidtruelove5022 400000 what?

    • @eliannafreely5725
      @eliannafreely5725 5 місяців тому

      The floor seats will be pretty impressive though.

  • @slsmith9281
    @slsmith9281 Рік тому +5

    Enjoyed this video very much, Jake...really nice change from our current grim fare. Want some more please.

  • @pezz_pezzer
    @pezz_pezzer 3 роки тому +33

    Holy crap! That's it, you just wrote a great science fiction plot. An asteroid from outside our solar system made mostly of something like element 115 crashes here and it triggers a technology race here on Earth spring boarding us into advanced space travel. Oh man we need to get this one written.

    • @darrowallgood6353
      @darrowallgood6353 2 роки тому +7

      Yo ever heard of the story of vibranium?

    • @Eyepatchfilms
      @Eyepatchfilms 2 роки тому +3

      @@darrowallgood6353 also the expanse

    • @tactical_trucker4761
      @tactical_trucker4761 2 роки тому +3

      Anything other than a woke remake.

    • @urphakeandgey6308
      @urphakeandgey6308 2 роки тому +5

      That's very close to the original plot of COD zombies... Before it was directed by Michael Bay and was all about ancient aliens, time travel, and multiverses.

    • @3-minutelisteningpractice884
      @3-minutelisteningpractice884 2 роки тому

      But wouldn't element 115 immediately decay as soon as it entered our solar system?

  • @EASTSIDERIDER707
    @EASTSIDERIDER707 3 роки тому +15

    Bob’s Corvette was powered by homemade hydrogen. That was his project at the time.

  • @morganlamb5308
    @morganlamb5308 Рік тому +6

    Thanks Jake,this is too awesome for words actually.I like this kind of subject Jake,a lot.I am sure you know who Robert Salas of the 341st Missile Wing Strategic Air Command is who served at Malmstrom AFB in 1967 is then.Excellent work Jake and I am really glad to see these videos from you.

    • @danielwilson2947
      @danielwilson2947 Рік тому

      Keep up the good work…I’m listening

    • @DEPORTER_SUPPORTER
      @DEPORTER_SUPPORTER Рік тому

      I believed Robert Salad until he claimed years later that he's also an alien abductee.

  • @funkdoktor9099
    @funkdoktor9099 2 роки тому +7

    Brother-your analytical approach to Bobs Sports model was awesome. I thoroughly enjoyed this video. Growing up, in high school, I thought Physics was boring. But youtube content creators have made me realize how fascinating Physics is.awesome video. I subbed.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  2 роки тому +1

      Welcome to the channel Funkdoktor! Great to have you with us!

    • @funkdoktor9099
      @funkdoktor9099 2 роки тому

      @@JakeBroe its awesome when you find content that is both entertaining and educational. What I hope a lot of people took from your videos, is that what Bob did explain, is 110,000% plausible. More likely probable. The science is not bs. Since you saw Jeremy Corbells video, he said heavy elememt experts said it was probable that 115 exists in a stable form. The other thing that I found really interesting is that the heavy element gurus have said that certain parts of the galaxy, including an area where Zeta Reticulu is, more than likely have stable 115. And where did Bob say the craft possibly came from? ZR. Anyways-tangent time aside-your videos are scratch both those itches. Education and entertainment.

    • @jamesnoxon6265
      @jamesnoxon6265 2 роки тому

      @@funkdoktor9099 I remember that Swiss dude with the one arm, who made many UFO movies back in the day. He said they were from Zeta Reticuli also. Somehow the aliens befriended him, allowing him to film their spacecraft, although they could make the craft invisible, they let him see them and film it.

    • @funkdoktor9099
      @funkdoktor9099 2 роки тому

      @@jamesnoxon6265 here is a video of a russian who happened to discover a way to see an invisible ufo by accident. Its just like Bob said. If your underneath it looking at it upwards, it bends light around it. He was filming a short video and was using a piece of clear glass as some type of filter. And lo and behold their it is. Im guessing the glass refracts the light in a certain way making it visible. Its wild.
      ua-cam.com/video/gIK9OWbP-VM/v-deo.html

    • @funkdoktor9099
      @funkdoktor9099 2 роки тому

      @@JakeBroe i forgot to send you this. Its a video of an "invisible ufo" being made visible. Im guessing that bc the guy who made the video was using a piece of glass as a filter on his iphone, the glass refracted light differently than the lens or our eyes. Its exactly like Bob said. If your underneath its invisible. Its wild. Enjoy.
      ua-cam.com/video/gIK9OWbP-VM/v-deo.html
      ua-cam.com/video/gIK9OWbP-VM/v-deo.html

  • @foundnotlost
    @foundnotlost 2 роки тому +354

    The way Bob explains how the government run the project is what makes me believe the story more.

    • @russhamilton3800
      @russhamilton3800 2 роки тому +5

      Yeah those gubbmint guys a pros at running shit...

    • @Bundysvideos
      @Bundysvideos 2 роки тому +17

      I believe he worked at a secret base, but I think he was just told they were alien spacecraft so as to not let him know that the crafts they were working on were actually prototypes.
      I don’t believe anything he says about element 115 tho, any one that can count past 114 and has looked at and understood the periodic table would have predicted element 115 existed or can exist in some sense.
      Some of the incidents lazar describes are also similar to a movie that was out before lazar claims his experience happened.
      Which leads me to believe that maybe he is the type of person that has an imaginative and imperfect memory. I have a friend that is similar in this sense, lead me to learning about memory(The Memory Illusion by Julia Shaw), his memory of scenarios would differ greatly from what actually happened, even when it was caught on camera, he couldn’t accept that his memory of what happened is not at all what happened.

    • @einhalbesbrot
      @einhalbesbrot 2 роки тому +17

      @@Bundysvideos the Handscanner he described and later viewed a picture of was used in a movie or tvseries aswell

    • @Bundysvideos
      @Bundysvideos 2 роки тому +2

      @@einhalbesbrot yes that’s actually what I’m talking about

    • @recreant359
      @recreant359 2 роки тому +8

      The fact his story has evolved and changed over the decades should be more than enough evidence to discredit all that he’s says

  • @almanages
    @almanages 2 роки тому +9

    That is one of a kind presentation. Very intriguing point of view. I don' think I ever heard anything similar amongst the hundreds of floating theories out there. good job!

  • @vjulienmichalk2760
    @vjulienmichalk2760 Рік тому +5

    Hello Jake, very nice video. I like the thinking, well done! You ask in this video if Bob told how the gravity wave is emitted, and amplified. Well, he did in his original 1992 video. First, Bob says that we need to understand that the 115 does 2 jobs when shot with a proton: emit the gravitational wave, and emit an anti-matter particle. On the gravitational wave, he says that it's contained within every atom, but 115 is big enough (or configured in a certain proton-neutron arrangement) so that the wave '' extends '' the perimeter of the nucleus, but by a tiny bit, as mentioned in your video. Bob says that to ''access'' this wave, we need to ''shake'' the nucleus (with the bombardment of a proton) so that a little bit of the wave is ''shot'', or ''ejected'' outside the atom. One that tiny bit is shot, we just need it to be in the right direction to amplify and focus it, and that's why 115 is manufactured as a cone made out of little discs, and then place apex down in the reactor (by atomic geometry, the wave is can only be shot with biggest its amplitude downwards. Of course the wave goes in every direction, thus the fact that when Bob wanted to touch the reactor in function, he couldn't, but the goal is to give the initial wave some direction for optimization). Once that is made, Bob says you can amplify this type of wave like any electromagnetic wave in an oscilloscope. You just need A LOT of electric power to amplify a wave smaller than an atom nucleus, to maybe the size of the craft and further more to the size of the interstellar distance you want to travel. The famous ''corona discharge'' Bob mentions when he saw the craft fly could be a side effect of the transfer of electromagnetic energy from the reactor to the amplifier. So Bob implies that the gravity amplifier is like an oscilloscope but for gravity waves instead of electromagnetic waves and in that manner, emitters would be like any wave guides (as we use in microwave ovens) to focus the said waves. On the energy part, Bob says that when the proton is shot at 115, it becomes 116 and almost instantly turns back to 115, and antimatter is emitted. At the end of his original video of 1992, he ask Edward Teller about this particular nuclear reaction, which he names ''Zeta'' decay... This could work if that particular arrangement would make the relativistic equation of the atom collapse, and thus ''emit'' antimatter instantly, like currently predicted in atom with number Z= 137 (possibly the biggest element possible, Feynmanium). Please relate to the lecture down below for more explanation on the possibility of the energy part made by antimatter emission, and the famous ''island of stability'' for superheavy elements (see at 44 minutes, but I encourage to watch the full lecture anyway) : ua-cam.com/video/cNFr5UJeQXc/v-deo.html&ab_channel=OakRidgeNationalLaboratory. Hope this helps.

  • @christhorney
    @christhorney Рік тому

    ok youtube algo ill watch it already! this video has been in my top 5 on my home page constantly for months since i have been watching your UA content lol

  • @markplymale
    @markplymale 3 роки тому +8

    Can’t say enough how awesome your channel is man. I watch every upload and these UFO/science videos are so interesting

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  3 роки тому +3

      Thanks Mark! Yep, these videos were an unexpected detour, but they were a lot of fun to think about! The uptick in UFO/UAP chatter from the government is interesting as well. Maybe something big will happen in the coming years.

    • @allistairneil8968
      @allistairneil8968 Рік тому

      @@JakeBroe Big like the current crisis in Ukraine? I came here because I usually wake up to your daily broadcast somewhat reminiscent of goodmorning Vietnam. Keep up the good work.

  • @oscarbello50
    @oscarbello50 3 роки тому +3

    This is an awesome approach to explain the Fermi's paradox. Such a great analytical mind yours!

  • @frankhamelin1386
    @frankhamelin1386 Рік тому

    That was so different from your usual videos very informative I must say 👍👊 20:08

  • @richardgrimbleby7853
    @richardgrimbleby7853 2 роки тому

    After today's vid I've subscribed and ime steadily watching all your stuff keep on goin mate

  • @derrickscott6795
    @derrickscott6795 3 роки тому +42

    this is interesting af

    • @L0kias1
      @L0kias1 3 роки тому

      Yes it is my brother

    • @louisgoldberg1755
      @louisgoldberg1755 3 роки тому

      Yea man, its nice to see like minded people with the same curiosity!

    • @3ceyayo132
      @3ceyayo132 3 роки тому +1

      This is how it starts. Young kids watch this stuff and the ones who get it . And I mean really get it. And create new things. Starts with a dream and a little bit of knowledge to get started. Funny how I never paid attention in school, but now that I'm old I cant get enough.

    • @amazingamerican3958
      @amazingamerican3958 3 роки тому

      Maybe these heavier elements are on Earth, they're just in the core. We can't get to them because molten lava. Guess we have a reason to go to Mars now.

    • @spartacus1308
      @spartacus1308 3 роки тому

      100%

  • @TheHighlanderprime
    @TheHighlanderprime 3 роки тому +110

    By the way, Bob was probably there to give it his best explanation. So asking him to fully explain all the functions of these crafts isn’t exactly fair.
    Good theory about elements defining level of technology per a given star system.

    • @maximumviews5759
      @maximumviews5759 2 роки тому +10

      @Kernowjim what about him calling gravity waves before it was considered waves. It wasn't even considered until 2015

    • @jaysonwerlla1243
      @jaysonwerlla1243 2 роки тому +1

      @Kernowjim Bob didn’t predict like Einstein. He explained.

    • @phoenixrisin2269
      @phoenixrisin2269 2 роки тому

      Funny that they now have discovered element 115🤡And that corvette was running on hydrogen that he created.

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 2 роки тому +1

      @@phoenixrisin2269 And it has none of the properties he describes?

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 2 роки тому

      @@jaysonwerlla1243 Any unfalsifiable concept can explain. I can't explain all of you're life experiences simply by saying you're a brain in a jar and it's all an illusion. Science is about prediction. I can't predict anything by saying you're a brain in a jar.

  • @bashfullJ88
    @bashfullJ88 Рік тому +17

    Bob explains in the video how the Emitters have the gravity waves. Their are 2 reactions that occur when element 115 is hit with a proton. Antimatter and the Gravity A wave is released as well. That is where the gravity A wave is coming from. And the emitters at the bottom of the craft amplify and project the wave to where ever they want to travel to.

  • @leonidasvonsparta
    @leonidasvonsparta 2 роки тому +1

    great topic , enjoyed the video . really liked the idea of different elements in older systems, its not like we are not interesting to them but its mostly not worth.

  • @LowenKM
    @LowenKM 2 роки тому +157

    Interesting theory, thank you. And even aside from Lazar's story, it still makes a lotta sense that the heaviest, rarest and most exotic elements would likely become the universe's most valuable 'currency'.

    • @johnwong2528
      @johnwong2528 2 роки тому +25

      It’s basically the “Spice” from Dune.

    • @georgethompson1460
      @georgethompson1460 2 роки тому +3

      If you want exotic make something out of strange or charm quarks.

    • @MisFakapek
      @MisFakapek 2 роки тому +7

      Well what I'm surprised is that Jake didnt notice how many times Bob mentioned in Rogan's show that "he was limited to one component and that was a hard limit". Second is... Jake for god sake -> our star/sun is just to small for even a nova level event let alone super nova. We are living next to a small, stable and pretty cozy star that will be living for a shitload years to come (we have one of the most durable star design apparently!).

    • @brucegoodwin634
      @brucegoodwin634 2 роки тому +3

      Why would it be valuable if there’s no know use?

    • @jelink22
      @jelink22 2 роки тому

      Yeah, it would make a lotta sense-----IF there were any hard evidence that aliens existed and were close enough to have enough trade to require a currency---oh wait! We don't have that evidence.

  • @jimmycurrire7868
    @jimmycurrire7868 3 роки тому +62

    You're upset about the verbiage Bob used while he was talking about element 115 in the '80s and '90s It wasn't mainstream cuz it wasn't a real element yet so in an older guy's vernacular he's going to use different terminology

    • @dickwellington8578
      @dickwellington8578 3 роки тому +9

      He and Jeremy corbell said he has stable element 115. If he really did he would change science over night. They’re both charlatans

    • @LovBoat
      @LovBoat 3 роки тому +9

      @@dickwellington8578 I don’t trust that corbell goof. He is a typical ‘media’ vulture and liar.

    • @dickwellington8578
      @dickwellington8578 3 роки тому +6

      @@LovBoat did you see the bullshit video he released today that was supposed to be groundbreaking? He’s so defensive when questioned and that makes us all look like jokes. I hope everybody just stops paying attention to him

    • @joekey8464
      @joekey8464 3 роки тому +1

      Now we got the Pentagon report - no evidence for ET....no "alien" in their possession in any of their facilities.

    • @Oldnite1994
      @Oldnite1994 3 роки тому

      @@dickwellington8578 they have it in possesion?

  • @apollolasky7079
    @apollolasky7079 2 роки тому +4

    the reactor was actually a magnetron ion sputtering machine, making the element115 on the fly kinda like vapor deposition(potentially not actually 115 due to its plasma state). Since dealing with antimatter only minute particle quantities are required. So one can literally use sand; to protect paticles in glass. Imaging atomic marbles; but the center of the marble is the element 115 single particle. Microscope plasma droplets.

  • @mattgerke3206
    @mattgerke3206 2 роки тому +38

    It's highly unlikely Bob was referring to nuclear force, it's Jake who's confused. Bob was referring to quantum gravity where gravity is seen as a particle around the size of a Planck length, a progenitor of macro (big) gravity. So no, Bob didn't misspeak, I think Jake is just confused.

    • @highcaliberaffiliate7885
      @highcaliberaffiliate7885 2 роки тому +6

      As a scientist Jake should know better than to discredit unknown science with the science we have today. By doing so he’s basically saying we know everything there is to know.. the science he knows today is known today because of “claims” from scientists that were just like bob!

    • @TheSkiddywinks
      @TheSkiddywinks 2 роки тому +14

      @@highcaliberaffiliate7885 there is a massive difference between "Maybe..." and the kind of science mumbo jumbo that comes out of Bob's mouth.

    • @jazzlehazzle
      @jazzlehazzle 2 роки тому

      AMEN. Thank you!!

    • @mr.spinoza
      @mr.spinoza 2 роки тому

      @@TheSkiddywinks fancy seeing another sane person amongst these drones.

    • @PandaPuncher4Hire
      @PandaPuncher4Hire 2 роки тому +5

      @@mr.spinoza it's... Not mathematically proven to be impossible.. so... Think how much technology has advanced in the past ten, twenty years... 30-40 years ago, nobody imagined a 2" by 4" computer that everybody in the world uses daily would be possible... Why is Bob's idea so outlandish and unreasonable? Think of VR... To completely dismiss the idea of anti-gravity or whatever Bob's claims are is complete ignorance and close mindedness.

  • @messyjetski2549
    @messyjetski2549 3 роки тому +6

    another potential solution to your question of "why we haven't been invaded" is that any civilization capable of interstellar travel has already developed a post scarcity society, kind of like the federation. they have no need to acquire new resources. they don't have a capitalist mindset.

  • @AliefHamdani
    @AliefHamdani 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for making this video, Jake. Kudos to ya. I love the way you use visuals and infographics to drive home a point. I think they are very effective to me; especially when I am a very visual processing type. One thing that I hope that we can have from the UAPs is the Closed Loop Energy Systems. It could be that our scientists and engineers may have some of them as mentioned by Dr. Steven M. Greer. And, we could or could not figure it out. I hope that you make more of such videos. They are very insightful. I wish you good luck in your career and future endeavors.

  • @technoadmin
    @technoadmin 2 роки тому +27

    Thank you Jake for taking the time to look into this. Bob's story has always intrigued me, just for the fact he is not trying to make us believe him.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  2 роки тому +14

      Hey technoadmin! Thanks for becoming a channel member! Great to have you with us! I also think I believe Bob's story. He really has gained nothing by telling this story and he's predicted quite a bit about all these UAPs.

    • @MrPullela
      @MrPullela Рік тому +1

      Love your theory. And the insight that planets with lighter elements and civilizations are of limited potential. was wondering if you ran this by an astrophysicist and see what they think

    • @dannymeadowswa6mqz212
      @dannymeadowswa6mqz212 Рік тому

      The cure to save our earth
      But he just can't save earth

    • @seditt5146
      @seditt5146 10 місяців тому +2

      Why do yall keep regurgitating this nonsense? Bob has without a doubt gained big time by his story. His story is crap, utter crap i dont get why people would believe it especially those who know anythng at all about science.@@JakeBroe

    • @eliannafreely5725
      @eliannafreely5725 5 місяців тому

      @@seditt5146 "Science" doesn't prohibit inquiry. I don't know what I believe here, but I know that people who do know about "science" usually are more specific - for instance one might have said "those who don't know anything about astrophysics", or "chemistry", or "quantum mechanics". Since you spend more time using the word "crap" than specifying the branch of scientific inquiry that is relevant, it gives me the impression you may not know a lot about "science" either.

  • @josegonzalezrinconusmc4150
    @josegonzalezrinconusmc4150 2 роки тому +2

    The universe is so big I can’t even begin to imagine how big it really is,Einstein said that imagination is more important then wisdom,you did a great job on this topic.

  • @gobblegobble239
    @gobblegobble239 3 роки тому +13

    You mean his Corvette that ran on water? Or the jet propelled one?Yeah I'd say that's pretty cool

    • @JuanWick209
      @JuanWick209 3 роки тому

      Google convert combustion engine to hydrogen. It isnt difficult to run a motor off of water, electrodes and a stainless steel tank

    • @gobblegobble239
      @gobblegobble239 3 роки тому +2

      @@JuanWick209 yeah it's a bit more of a feat to accomplish in the pre internet era

    • @sryburn641
      @sryburn641 3 роки тому +1

      I had a friend that was working on a water car with three partners, I believe in the early 80's. They had to take shifts watching the warehouse where they were working out of fear other people/groups would attempt to break in and steal any evidence of their progress. One of the guys passed away mysteriously. He only told me that they decided to stop the project.
      This was in Texas.

  • @timothyhenderson1914
    @timothyhenderson1914 3 роки тому +206

    Those were some great theories actually. Never thought about our solar system lacking resources other galactic civilizations might need. Loved this.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  3 роки тому +13

      Thanks for watching Timothy! I also had never considered this. Fascinating to consider what other star systems will be composed of!

    • @yourmaw6839
      @yourmaw6839 3 роки тому +16

      Thing is. If a alien race could travel to our solar system. Then they could make any resource from the atom up

    • @sminkycorp
      @sminkycorp 3 роки тому +6

      @@JakeBroe We have a load of post iron elements because the molecular cloud our solar system condensed from was in the vicinity of a neutron star-neutron star collision.
      I think any technological civilization would have arisen in the same conditions, but as they expand or travel they would need more perhaps?

    • @fulmerduckworth8281
      @fulmerduckworth8281 3 роки тому +3

      @@JakeBroe I thought this was an interesting take as well. For all we know if there are more advanced life forms, they come from star systems that are newer than ours.

    • @synthshoot1026
      @synthshoot1026 3 роки тому +7

      I agree. This point was interesting. I also think that biological diversity is another commodity that might be Of interest to other civilizations. Different planets that are suitable for life might not necessarily produce similar dna or the like.

  • @CYON4D
    @CYON4D Рік тому

    I am happy to see other people sharing similar thoughts on the subject.
    Great stuff.

  • @miketheburns
    @miketheburns Рік тому +3

    I think I saw a clip of Lazar explaining the propulsion (or maybe I just imagined it), and I think it was that in order to propel the craft in a direction, you just increase and decrease the gravitational fields of one or more of the drums. So like if 2 are operating at 100% and the third only at 50%, you'd be going in the direction of the 50% one, but also vertically at an agle of 75° from the ground. All three at 100% then you go straight up. Or something like that.

  • @wg8561
    @wg8561 2 роки тому +39

    Great video. I really like your idea of our solar system not being worth the it for aliens. I would add that there probably exists a massive abundance of uninhabited planets in the universe, why would anyone need to mess with an inhabited one. Also maybe life itself is rare enough that it is far more valuable than any resources.

    • @Ryan-xh7pe
      @Ryan-xh7pe 2 роки тому

      Exactly, why visit our shitty sun when there are way more intense ones that def produce way more valuable resources and are more stable, I can’t imagine living in a Goldie lox zone of a white dwarf or supergiant…

    • @royhorn2782
      @royhorn2782 2 роки тому

      I think he said that this was Bob's idea as to why extraterrestrial life doesn't come in and conquer us.

    • @larryo6874
      @larryo6874 2 роки тому

      I think life on other planets is fairly common, but intelligent aware life much less so.

    • @kparker2430
      @kparker2430 Рік тому +1

      Isaac Arthurs has covered this; the jury has delivered its verdict. Either no one gives a shit, we are pre contact primitives in the sticks with nothing anyone can't get everywhere else in the universe; or we are in a cage. :)

  • @nicandrofilho3799
    @nicandrofilho3799 2 роки тому +5

    Fascinating premise. You can build a great foundation for a sci-fi story from there.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  2 роки тому +1

      Thanks Nicandro! Maybe I could some day!

  • @jonv2911
    @jonv2911 Рік тому +5

    Quite interesting video! I have usually watched your great video blogs on Ukraine but here you give fantastic presentation, I think you have phenomenal teaching skills, thanks for this!

  • @MARGATEorcMAULER
    @MARGATEorcMAULER Рік тому +1

    This video just came came up while scrolling,and I am glad it did, pretty cool.

  • @jamescaulfield6632
    @jamescaulfield6632 3 роки тому +12

    There are different isotopes to every element on the periodic table we just haven't found one for that element that stabilizes yet doesn't mean it's not possible just means that our technology is not there yet

    • @spacetimeworm
      @spacetimeworm 2 роки тому

      But didn't Bob see that 115 is stable? I thought he said somewhere in the 115 range it is stable but by the time they get to 116 the elements are unstable again.

  • @GameWatcher545
    @GameWatcher545 3 роки тому +4

    quite an interesting theory, never heard of it. So guess you added it to our pool of thought!

  • @Luxcium
    @Luxcium Рік тому +5

    Normally only crazy people would defend such theories and others would try to disprove or something... I am Happy to see that Jake is taking a different approach... He is explaining it from a respectful perspective despite being skeptical... This is a very interesting angle to look at something that is very strange no matter what angle you take to try to understand those claims...

    • @stevenpace892
      @stevenpace892 Рік тому

      True, speculation can spark creativity, and there is only benefits from that.

  • @johnalejandro8650
    @johnalejandro8650 Рік тому

    Great video and rundown of Bob’s lecture. I really believe there is something to his story. I’m excited to see what the next 10-20 years may reveal as we progress in our technology.

    • @Baud2Bits
      @Baud2Bits Рік тому +2

      bob can't name a single person he went to school with or a teacher who taught him so I would be a teeny bit sceptical about anything he says.

  • @larrymcjones
    @larrymcjones 3 роки тому +3

    This is an awesome switch up! I’ve only seen your finance/stock/money and military content...

  • @JorgeBachtold
    @JorgeBachtold 3 роки тому +20

    Our Sun is not going to become a supernova. It doesn't have enough mass for that.

    • @LovBoat
      @LovBoat 3 роки тому

      How do you know our sun is a “he”…?

    • @JorgeBachtold
      @JorgeBachtold 3 роки тому

      @@LovBoat I mean "it". Just a typo.

  • @brianjones7660
    @brianjones7660 Рік тому +2

    they travel impossible distances at impossible speeds only to crash and burn on a hill out in the middle of Cowflop NV, instead of the Michael Rennie approach.

  • @fireangel6038
    @fireangel6038 2 роки тому +2

    I’m so confused. You make a great video about physics and chemistry, I’m like “wow this was good I want to watch more” I open your channel and it’s all finance lol. I was not ready for that.

    • @oliivioljy9700
      @oliivioljy9700 Рік тому

      Simple people look for simple answers to their views. They hardly ever burden their own brains and build chained thought forms, or introductions to the passage of time, and reflections from the past era of modern development up to these days. If you took a cell phone to the 1700s, you would be a witch talking to the devil alone. And at the very least, you would get into trouble as a prisoner of the views of the social community of the time, from which you would not get out very easily, so it is always from the eras of social restrictions every time of life in which we live and these times burden our brains with our choices to be accepted by others.

    • @alexandervelez9507
      @alexandervelez9507 Рік тому +2

      same. now it’s all about russia. 😂

  • @eyeprops5422
    @eyeprops5422 3 роки тому +17

    I'm sure that in 2051, Element 115 is available in every corner drugstore, but in 2021, it's a little hard to come by.

    • @freddyruger
      @freddyruger 3 роки тому +4

      It's our density

    • @eyeprops5422
      @eyeprops5422 3 роки тому +2

      @Daftrax 98 it's a Back to the Future reference.

    • @gavind7967
      @gavind7967 3 роки тому +1

      That's heavy

    • @eyeprops5422
      @eyeprops5422 3 роки тому +4

      @@gavind7967 Heavy?... Is there something wrong with the earth's gravitational pull?

    • @Tevious
      @Tevious 3 роки тому +1

      Great Scott!

  • @mikefrey5039
    @mikefrey5039 3 роки тому +5

    In the video you watched, Lazar explains they scientists TRIED to work on the "engine" but when they tried to "cut it open" they were killed, which is why the job openings occurred that led to Bob's hiring.

    • @roobear5357
      @roobear5357 3 роки тому

      And it was a good thing Bob was smart enough not to try to cut it open

    • @pgtmr2713
      @pgtmr2713 3 роки тому +2

      Cut what open? Their aluminum foil is indestructable. I kid. I think Bob Lazar is well thought out science fiction used to to distract people with Area 51 nonsense. Not saying he's even in on it. He just jams everyone's radar, like the very best techno word salad does.

    • @39stepd
      @39stepd 2 роки тому +1

      @@pgtmr2713 I believe this also lol. There's no way the US Govt would let a man with knowledge of the deepest inner workings go untouched. To me, it just says that the government is not actually worried about Lazar, for whatever reason.

    • @timothym2241
      @timothym2241 2 роки тому

      They were really scraping the bottom of the job pool bucket to hire a guy with a mail order college degree and that finished in the bottom third of his high school chemistry class.

    • @xeow-1844
      @xeow-1844 2 роки тому

      @@39stepd The thing is, even the US government admitted that UFO/UAPs do in fact exist. So there's something fishy going on here.

  • @ToddJambon
    @ToddJambon Рік тому

    Thanks for this video. I've been wanting to hear a scientist's take on the Lazar tape.

  • @GroundbreakGames
    @GroundbreakGames 2 роки тому +6

    I’ll say one thing. If Bob is lying, he’s being thorough.

    • @jumpieva
      @jumpieva Рік тому +1

      and consistent :D

    • @Dutch1954
      @Dutch1954 Рік тому +1

      He's lying. He's been milking this subject from day one.

    • @scottlondon8382
      @scottlondon8382 Рік тому

      @@Dutch1954 What would he gain from it though? people camping and shitting on his front lawn?

  • @adamstevens5518
    @adamstevens5518 2 роки тому +5

    I watched several Lazar interviews a year and more ago but I guess I never found the one where he described a novel, and after hearing it seemingly likely, hypothesis for why our solar system wouldn’t be invaded. The UA-cam algorithm really is a fantastic thing when it brings me to videos such as yours.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  2 роки тому +1

      Haha, glad you found my video! Welcome to the channel!

  • @timrichmond5226
    @timrichmond5226 3 роки тому +5

    Which would explain why they are interested in our nuclear capabilities, since this is currently the extent of our power.

  • @smoodie1
    @smoodie1 Рік тому +1

    Another reason for non invasion suggested by James Hall is that there are enough habitable planets with lower life forms yet uninhabited by intelligent life throughout the galaxies that there is little need for an "invasion".

  • @JuusoAlasuutari
    @JuusoAlasuutari 2 роки тому

    Love your channel! Interesting take on Lazar. Also your recent videos on Russia seem worth a watch. Subbed.

  • @ClearAdventure
    @ClearAdventure 3 роки тому +3

    Other life forms not invading our solar system due to the lack of important materials is fascinating and makes perfect sense! Thank you!

  • @ChrisLyons
    @ChrisLyons 3 роки тому +5

    Thank you for taking a rational look at Bob’s claims. There are far too many video’s that go off the deep end and speculate way beyond anything he actually says.

  • @pyropulseIXXI
    @pyropulseIXXI Рік тому +2

    If we took a computer to ancient peoples, it would be utterly impossible for them to figure out how it works, because to do that requires electron microscopes. Perhaps we cannot know how this stuff works because we simply don't even have the necessary tech to even properly study it

  • @Astrnauted
    @Astrnauted 2 роки тому +5

    Gravity A is actually called “strong nuclear force.” It’s the force that holds quarks and neuons and protons together.

    • @chrisduggan2848
      @chrisduggan2848 2 роки тому

      Something that equivalent to covalent bond in chemistry?

    • @Astrnauted
      @Astrnauted 2 роки тому

      @@chrisduggan2848 not exactly covalent bonds are more so like the stability of an atoms balance between attractive and repulsive forces. Strong nuclear force - “gravity A” is a different type of gravity then we experience. It’s so strong yet so local quarks it can hold particles such as quarks and nuons and protons something we can’t achieve whilst gravity B would be more proportional to weak nuclear force we experience that holds us to the ground and such. The difference is gravity A is so much stronger it actually holds fundamental particles of life together. Gravity B is actually the weakest of the 4 fundamental forces which are in order from strongest to weakest 1)the strong nuclear force 2) electromagnetic force 3)weak nuclear force and lastly 4) gravity

  • @FR-ce2tk
    @FR-ce2tk 3 роки тому +36

    In my opinion this is how we should treat these fantastic claims that people make. Instead of falling into one camp or the other, think of the potential and possibilities of this sort of technology. Well done sir.

    • @tactical_trucker4761
      @tactical_trucker4761 2 роки тому +4

      If I could only find someone on the otherside of any debate that formed his arguement like this I would have respect and I best know my shit before confrontation. Very VERY healthy exchange of ideas.

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 2 роки тому +1

      The issue is how often people use the allure of amazing technology to scam people. Just look at the Theranos scam. Or the Gateway scam. Or, for one developing right this moment, the Space Hotel scam.

  • @AstroDynamics1
    @AstroDynamics1 3 роки тому +8

    bob said he believes the craft might all be "tuned" to the same frequency. so you tune gravity waves from the reactor to the amplifiers in the same way microwaves move through tuned tubes

    • @garykish8951
      @garykish8951 3 роки тому +1

      Some of the research performed on the meta materials found thoughout the world suggest it has properties that have a "tuning" effect.
      Evidently we are not capable of recreating these materials at this time.

    • @alanhughes1262
      @alanhughes1262 3 роки тому +2

      Maybe element 115 vibrates like quartz to create a frequency then the whole craft resonants like a tuned circuit passing back and forth at the gravity frequency creating lift the outside around the craft acts like a dielectric in a capacitor, bob said no wires etc does not need wires it runs a frequency like a transmitter these materials are more than likely on other planets like the earth has oil.

    • @sryburn641
      @sryburn641 3 роки тому +1

      Being a musician and having experimented with so many different frequencies and audio drones, I have experienced some things that defy my limited knowledge of physics.
      Very interesting stuff.

  • @MrDscrow
    @MrDscrow 9 місяців тому

    Hey Jake, great videos. I've been watching your coverage of the war in Ukraine for some time now. You have some of the best coverage and thank you for continuing to cover the war even when it falls out of the MSM cycle.
    As a person who studies a lot of the things you talked about in this video, I think you did great with your explanations. I just want to add that, there are people at several places around the world, UC Berkeley, Texas A&M, GSI Darmstadt, dubna russia, that work very hard on the production of Super Heavy Elements (SHEs). One theory of nuclei is the nuclear shell model (NSM), which tells us that protons and neutrons occupy shells in a nucleus. This is similar to the case in atoms where electrons occupy orbitals and have energy levels. Just like in atoms, the electrons can "fill" a shell making them very chemically stable - the noble gasses being full orbital atoms. The NSM predicts a similar phenomenon which arises as "magic numbers" and "magic nuclei". These are nuclei where the neutron or proton shells are full. When both are full the nuclei are "doubley magic". Anyways, these magic nuclei are some of the most stable nuclei, and the protons and neutrons inside them become very strongly bound due to the strong force. The NSM points to the notion that an "island of stability" may exist on the chart of nuclides that has some stable SHEs. So far, none have been found but it is an active area of research at many institutions around the world.
    I thought you might find this interesting. Thanks again for all your coverage and thanks for the great videos!

    • @MrDscrow
      @MrDscrow 9 місяців тому

      Also, regarding comments about the proton-induced reaction with 115 being used to produce antimatter... Once 116 is created, the creation mechanism doesn't matter. Nuclei forget how they were created. The physics that dictates them only cares about the current state, not the previous one. p+115->116 isn't a special reaction.

  • @ap4702
    @ap4702 2 роки тому +59

    Bob is an odd case because this situation essentially just a theory about a theory. Bobs presentations mainly consist of what he observed and the whole reason he was there was to gain knowledge into HOW these machines worked. So at the same time we can't expect him to explain everything in his limited time researching, but also for us we can't be expected to believe/understand everything because it goes against fundamental laws.

    • @klubstompers
      @klubstompers 2 роки тому +5

      Which fundamental laws? I think it more along the lines of our current understanding of physics. All laws of physics have limits, like when you push newtons law of motion to the extreme, it start to break down.
      "any technology that can be distinguished from magic is insufficiently advanced"

    • @MrMZaccone
      @MrMZaccone 2 роки тому +6

      Allegedly observed.

    • @PsychoticWolfie
      @PsychoticWolfie 2 роки тому +7

      Bruh he just never worked at area 51, many of his claims have been MORE than thoroughly debunked. In fact, this video does a bit of debunking itself. But IMO Jake should definitely have elaborated more that element 115 and 116 just DO NOT do what Lazar claims. They're relatively normal, if unstable, elements, they don't have special energy and they don't decay directly into antimatter in a proton beam. This is just not how particle physics works. It would be cool if any of this were true, but I'm not going to let that override what experts say about elements and subatomic interactions. Bob Lazar made up a story for attention and ran with it, that's all.

    • @Waroyopfami
      @Waroyopfami 2 роки тому +7

      @@PsychoticWolfie bob lazar's element 115 is not the same isotope as the element 115 that we know of

    • @Onedog7
      @Onedog7 2 роки тому +4

      @@PsychoticWolfie it has not been debunked and you have no clue what you are talking about lol stop pretending to be smart

  • @marcelll5660
    @marcelll5660 2 роки тому +63

    Bob claimed the ufos would turn and point a certain direction before accelerating. After watching the fairly recent videos taken from the fighter jets, ufos appear to do just as Bob had claimed. Bob had also made other claims in regards to s4 that later appeared to be true.

    • @TheMysteriesOfThePast
      @TheMysteriesOfThePast 2 роки тому +1

      @Keyser Soze check out the Nimitz incident the craft is rotating

    • @marcelll5660
      @marcelll5660 2 роки тому

      According to Lazar the craft will tip toward the direction it wants to go. At least the round craft he claims to have been associated with while at Area 51. Obviously not all are round according to the many videos now available for your viewing pleasure 😉

    • @areyoutheregoditsmedave
      @areyoutheregoditsmedave 2 роки тому

      Ww3 abt to kick off. It’ll be like horses charging into machine gun fire at the start of ww1

    • @peppermintgal4302
      @peppermintgal4302 2 роки тому +1

      @@TheMysteriesOfThePast No it isnt. It always turns counter to the camera. That means the observed shape is an artifact of how the camera works. Whatever is being seen is a very bright, in infrared, object --- though this brightness is probably it reflecting the infrared beam emitted by that kind of camera, meaning it's something reflective. It's also not fast, nor does it accelerate --- there are figures given by the camera on its heading, where it is, etc., and by doing trigonometry, you'll see it's actually quite slow. The clouds moving are caused by the parallax effect, the small field of view, (these cameras are meant to focus on distant objects, so to get higher detail, the lens has a very limited fov,) and the motion of the jet that carries the camera. The object suddenly seems to zoom away because the camera stops tracking it for one reason or another, so its not longer turning to keep it in view. (Possibly the camera hit the limit of how far around it could turn.)

    • @firstduckofwellington6889
      @firstduckofwellington6889 2 роки тому

      @@areyoutheregoditsmedave you should stop

  • @slimyjimmy1589
    @slimyjimmy1589 3 роки тому +9

    Honestly sir, I've watched all your videos and you have made me join the military, I am currently in AIT in the army and as soon as I graduate I plan to go to college and commission in the air force or army and this is all thanks to you, thank you for sharing your knowledge and wisdom sir.

    • @JakeBroe
      @JakeBroe  3 роки тому

      That's awesome jimmy! It's still going to be a lot of work from this point if this is what you want. Work hard and stay focused and you can achieve this goal!

    • @slimyjimmy1589
      @slimyjimmy1589 3 роки тому +2

      I do believe it is a good choice, and I find the idea of being an officer to be a honorable decision, as soon as I am out of AIT sir, I will enroll in the smp program as a cadet. It will be challenging, but surviving challenges is what is going to make me the man I want to become.

    • @sryburn641
      @sryburn641 3 роки тому

      That's really cool, man. Thank you for your service. We need ya.

    • @slimyjimmy1589
      @slimyjimmy1589 3 роки тому

      @@sryburn641 thank you sir, but honestly it's just the right thing to do, it is not easy but I wouldn't have it any other way.

    • @sryburn641
      @sryburn641 3 роки тому

      @@slimyjimmy1589 that's what sets you apart. I truly appreciate your manners and respect you show others. Alot of youngsters have lost that due to poor parenting or absent parents. Whoever raised you has done an excellent job. Please tell them that for me.

  • @joshuarivera6460
    @joshuarivera6460 2 роки тому

    when you got to the 2/3 part of your video you blew my mind guy

  • @rionmotley2514
    @rionmotley2514 2 роки тому +4

    Thermoelectric modules are also used for mini refrigerators, etc. They're in the 15% efficiency range at best right now. Even Carnot/Sterling engines only hit 50% at ridiculous temperature differentials. There's a lot of particle physics that he's glossing over or ignoring, and particle acceleration is wildly inefficient. Lots of Sci fi magic going on there.

  • @c0nsaw
    @c0nsaw 3 роки тому +3

    Really enjoyed that. Never crossed my mind, our elements available limitation would make us uninteresting to visit for an advanced civilization
    ..... subscribed thanks 👍🏻

    • @jimbaker5110
      @jimbaker5110 2 роки тому

      Well they make us uninteresting for take over. Don’t get that confused with just “visiting”. We are and have been visited by them for at least 12,000 years…Pyramids of Giza in Egypt, the Sphinx, Angor Wat in Cambodia, Ellora and Ajanta caves in India all prove that.
      So we have been visited. They are interested in our biology as well…humans, cows, our hormones, our development of emotions, how we reporduce, our DNA…etc.

  • @HarumiJerome
    @HarumiJerome 3 роки тому +4

    Heya Jake! I really enjoy your content on UFO/UAPs, I love that you take the time to break it all down scientifically and apply your knowledge to the subject. Regarding the absence of any wiring between components this has bothered me as well.
    I had watched another documentary called Phenomenon featuring a prominent computer scientist and long time investigator in the field of UFOs who had materials which were allegedly recovered from crashes that were examined on a molecular level to be constructed on an atomic level. Something that would cost billions of dollars on earth for even a small sample of and have no apparent use.
    Considering all of this my question is: would it be possible to construct the casing of components and/or frame works of this supposed craft on an atomic scale so as to be able to accommodate the anti-matter energies or whatever the currents would need to channel into the emitters?
    I’m depending on you to tell me how dumb this sounds.
    Anyhow thanks for the great content Jake! Keep up the great work!

    • @spacetimeworm
      @spacetimeworm 2 роки тому

      I always thought it was generally the ether that accommodates such energies..

    • @spacetimeworm
      @spacetimeworm 2 роки тому

      That probably sounds dumber than what you wrote. Even though I don't think what you wrote is dumb.

    • @iowaboy5326
      @iowaboy5326 2 роки тому

      I happen to believe that this earth has seen more than one "human species" that called this celestial ball home. And the reason we don't know it is because the earth cleans itself on a regular basis. Cleans itself of inhabitants and proof of a prior civilization. And who's to say, at one point in this solar systems lifetime, we did possess knowledge of most things and we lost the knowledge due to cataclysmic events ?

  • @DavePocklington
    @DavePocklington Рік тому +2

    Bob said in one interview that his predecessor at area 51 was killed, trying to open one of those gravity producing cylinders in the craft. That's probably why they didn't try it while he was there.

    • @eliannafreely5725
      @eliannafreely5725 5 місяців тому

      Do you remember how he was killed by any chance - radiation, blunt force trauma, heart attack, etc?

  • @user-iv6bh1iw1j
    @user-iv6bh1iw1j Місяць тому +1

    There are numbers in sequence in the periodic table. Anyone could have “predicted the next element after 114 would be 115

  • @stevenphipps1330
    @stevenphipps1330 2 роки тому +6

    You called Bob science fiction and then went on to say why the aliens haven't wiped us out because of alien movies you watched. Genuinely gave me a giggle. Thank you.

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 2 роки тому

      Thinking that there are likely alien civilizations in our galaxy and believing Bob's story are two different things.

    • @stanb.5261
      @stanb.5261 2 роки тому

      @@my3dviews Reality and Hollywood are 2 (very) different things...

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 2 роки тому

      @@stanb.5261 Never said they aren't. Are you agreeing or disagreeing with my comment? Do you believe Bob's story?

    • @stanb.5261
      @stanb.5261 2 роки тому

      @@my3dviews There R more planets in the universe than grains of sand on planet earth- yeah, that includes the Sahara. Even if intelligent life is only .001%- that's still a shitload, and intelligent we ain't...

    • @my3dviews
      @my3dviews 2 роки тому

      @@stanb.5261 Yes. There can be alien civilizations in the galaxy, but that doesn't mean that they are here on Earth and that Bob's story is true. Most astronomers think that there is intelligent life in the galaxy, but don't believe that there are aliens visiting Earth. That was the point of my comment. You again failed to answer whether you believe his story or not? Why are you avoiding it?

  • @jamesmacc
    @jamesmacc 3 роки тому +7

    Another possibility: They may have created us. Why would they destroy us when they could study us?

    • @davidwhite1963
      @davidwhite1963 3 роки тому

      Find a Bible and read it! It’ll scare the hell outa You! Nuff said!

    • @mikolasinyuk8298
      @mikolasinyuk8298 3 роки тому

      Good question! But one time they had been destroyed all civilization on our planet (if Zaharia Sitchin was right) many years ago...we know nothing about Egyptian hieroglyphs etc.

  • @davidhague3270
    @davidhague3270 5 місяців тому

    I do appreciate the closing frame from the film Things To Come one of the best films ever made thank you very much you have restored a little bit of my faith in humanity.

  • @danjenkins8981
    @danjenkins8981 2 роки тому

    Great video! Very entertaining theories!

  • @zombiekrypt1769
    @zombiekrypt1769 2 роки тому +21

    Bob explained (on the Joe Rogan podcast I think) that the ship creates a gravity well which the ship naturally falls into. You project the gravity well toward the direction you want the ship to go.

    • @MadeAlurik
      @MadeAlurik 2 роки тому

      Correct. Didn’t this guy say he listened to the Rogan podcast as well?

    • @caydjj
      @caydjj 2 роки тому +6

      That doesn’t answer how that energy goes from the thermoelectric conversion (so some type of electromagnetic energy) to the barrels, or how those barrels use that electromagnetic energy to create a gravity well

    • @MadeAlurik
      @MadeAlurik 2 роки тому +1

      @@caydjj
      I do want to preface this with the fact that I don’t think we’ve been visited, but the question is left open to interpretation.
      Lazar claims that it creates a gravity field and pulls the object. He doesn’t understand clearly how it works to the method of being able to recreate it.

    • @ZehMatt
      @ZehMatt 2 роки тому +2

      @@caydjj He said in the interview that he was not able to work on that, he was assigned to the reactor and the different groups did not share the information as they were not allowed to do that, according to Bob.

  • @YoCraps-og4kt
    @YoCraps-og4kt 3 роки тому +6

    I really enjoyed this video, thank you.
    Knowing the exact area, the exact time and telling others what they were going too see, and THEN IT HAPPENED and those present saw the test flights, is all I need too know that Bob Lazar is telling the truth.

  • @sexualtyrannosaurus8443
    @sexualtyrannosaurus8443 Рік тому +2

    I know you'll probably never see this but I really like these videos. I find Bob Lazarus story very interesting along with any other UFO stories

  • @stevenpace892
    @stevenpace892 Рік тому +1

    I have observed this before. People with conspiracy theories are not necessarily completely "out to lunch", but often they are using "alternative terminology", so other people fail to understand what they are speculating. Having an open mind helps, and if we were ever trying to have a conversation with aliens, understanding their ways of describing the universe would be a formidable challenge.

  • @jah-jah87
    @jah-jah87 3 роки тому +18

    Your theory of the lack of heavy elements neccessary for the "more advanced civilizations" is very interesting, not sure I ever heard such thing and yet I'm baffled by the logic behind it. You are good at explaining things. Great content. Keep it up.🤔😏

    • @joekey8464
      @joekey8464 3 роки тому

      heavy elements are unstable and are radioactive and are not much use...they decay in seconds...most of the things we use like iron, lead, gold, silver, copper, aluminum, carbon, gases, halogens, etc. are below uranium 92
      Heavy elements beyond 92 cannot be produced in the universe.

    • @omeedabedi4318
      @omeedabedi4318 3 роки тому +2

      @@joekey8464 Yiure just so full of shit lmao, there can be an infinite number of different isotopes of each element and there could very possibly be heavier stable elements that we don’t interact w because we’re confined to the materials we have on earth, who’s to say this shit doesn’t exist when we’re just a blip in a universe of similar galaxies and planets!! Shits mind blowing

    • @AntTonyPony
      @AntTonyPony 3 роки тому +1

      This is a great theory.

  • @massmemelastname4782
    @massmemelastname4782 2 роки тому +3

    If you watched any of Bob's interviews, you would clearly see that he indicated numerous times that they had NO IDEA how this thing works.

  • @hipp0joy
    @hipp0joy 5 місяців тому

    Have you looked into ionic wind propulsion to explain the 3 thrusters? It explains the sound he heard, a need for considerable energy, and many other details. Great video!

  • @Waroftheworldsz
    @Waroftheworldsz Рік тому +1

    Bob also said the reactor didn't produce any heat and remained at ambient temperature while in operation. It's curious that it might not actually be an Anti-matter reactor but could be a zero-point, or rather a vacuum energy reactor instead. Related to the Casimir Effect the reactor might actually use stable element 115 to generate or amplify an anti-gravity field much similar to how we would run electric current through certain rare Earth metals to generate magnetic fields. Zero-point energy is related to Casimir effect, which is to date the most prominent anti-gravity theory we have. It's also theorized, or rather proven with microwaves to its ability to be used to transfer energies wirelessly and without any cables or wires. Zero-point energy, also known as vacuum energy, generates negative energy; a key component for many theorized warp drives such as Alcubierre's warp drive. The only thing missing from these theorized warp drives? Exotic material which defies the laws of physics. Could a stable version of Element 115 amplify the Casimir effect? Or could it perhaps be used to generate its own gravitational bubble when used in co-junction with vacuum energy?
    One interesting prototype developed by Peter Grandics quotes:
    "A pyramidal shaped capacitor to induce an imbalance between the Earth’s electrostatic field and its magnetic field."
    and that it would:
    "Allow the manufacture of vehicles capable of levitation and flight. Vortexual space lattice currents are produced in a suitable pyramid when electrostatic and magnetic field interact transversally."
    "The induced space lattice currents can be utilized to generate Specific effects which may vary from propulsion to gravity cancellation and power generation."-- United States Patent Application Publication, Peter Grandics Patent #20010032905
    Grandics also describes a theoretical vehicle similar to Bob Lezar's depiction of the UFO he worked on, quote:
    In the center of the craft, a conductive, insulated pole is mounted such that the pole extends out into the exterior at the top of the craft. The tip of that pole has a metal ball mounted on which is also positively charged. When all the capacitor plates are charged, they induce a unidirectional, upward flow of the Space lattice. This means that the Space lattice pressure above the craft will be higher than the Space lattice pressure at the bottom of the craft. This pressure differential is unstable and progresses towards an equilibrium. It will grab the craft and propels it forward in order to eliminate the pressure gradient. This requires that a Sufficiently high Voltage be applied. My estimation is that about 5 kV is needed to lift every gram of an object. The capacitors incorporated into the hull will give control over lift.
    To obtain directional control over all three axes of movement, three capacitors need to be mounted at the bottom of the craft apart from each other. These capacitors, could take the shape of a ball and would be mounted on retractable shafts. The top half of the capacitors would be positively charged while the bottom half is negatively charged. When in flight, the capacitors are retracted and charged based on the needs of directional control. To achieve forward movement, the charges on one capacitor facing the direction of the desired path should be reduced relative to the other two capacitors. This would make the craft tilt forward and Start moving in that direction. An alternative method of lateral directional control could be obtained by dividing the capacitor bank in the hull into Segments which Segments could be charged individually.
    The most significant aspect of this type of propulsion System would be the loss of inertia during acceleration."--Quoted from the same patent publication afore mentioned.
    I should mention this patent was submitted by Peter Grandics in 2001, way after Bob Lazar's experience. I also find it curious that in the patent publication, a similar device is described by Grandics as was described by Bob. Predominantly the pyramid shaped rod, or lattice described by Grandics in the center of the prototype. I encourage people to look up Peter Grandics and his prototype, it's scary similar to Bob Lazar's UFO and it contains an actual theoretical prototype of Bob Lazar's UFO.

    • @Waroftheworldsz
      @Waroftheworldsz Рік тому

      For those wondering, Grandics and Lazar both describe a similar "reactor" and yes, I should mention reactor because Grandics observed quote:
      "It also demonstrates that potentially, we may be able to tap into the electromagnetic field of our planet and draw electric energy."
      and that:
      "I have found that a pyramid becomes a power generator when the electrostatic Voltage field gradient of the earth is reproduced around it. Tapping the energy field was as simple as placing a coil around the pyramid."-- Peter Grandics
      Lazar observed that his reactor had similar elements (components) later described by Peter Grandics, an encased vacuum with a pyramid structure in the center. I wonder if the pyramid structure perhaps was not a stable form of E115 as he was told, but rather a space lattice (as mentioned by Grandics) of 115. Perhaps also known as tetrahedron packing, that such condensing or packing might produce stable quantities of 115. Much like the lattice of a diamond or salt. Just food for thought.
      Edit:
      Maybe at the time Bob had no explanation for this kind of technology because the theories we have today wouldn't have been widely known back then; much less taught. So, what might've been known as gravity emitters and amplifiers by Bob were actually an advanced form of Capacitators transferring positive and negative energy from the reactor to induce gravity cancellation; and that Element 115 was an exotic matter that allowed our laws of physics to be seemingly defied or actually defied. That the reactor he worked on was an advanced form of the prototype mentioned by Peter Grandics, and that a stable form of E115 might actually produce exotic effects when introduced into a system like this. It should be noted that Grandic doesn't mention the need or use of any form of exotic matter like E115 to make his theorized craft levitate. It would just require a crap ton of energy. Perhaps the E115 acted as a form of coil or conduit like Grandic mentions to generate power and produce anti-gravity effects. Lazar describes 115 as "the fuel" when it was introduced into the reactor.

  • @TheMeisterManuel
    @TheMeisterManuel 2 роки тому +3

    Thank you for that followup. One of the very few channels I've seen that tries to stay neutral on the subject. Never thought about available elements here on earth, would make sense that this limit makes us a rather boring planet to go for harvesting resources. If you already have the technology to idk go to a galaxy that has a natually occorring element 160, it would make more sense of traveling there.
    Nevertheless I'd say these two things should be doable to prove within the next 50-100 years:
    Proof that the strong interaction is a wave (maybe by then we are able to manipulate this wave)
    Being able to produce small quantities of a stable form of element 115 or at least be sure that based on the islands of stability 115 is stable and not radioactive at this point
    Once these two things are proven we'd know for certain that Lazar wasn't lying about the propulsion system

  • @MDC_1985
    @MDC_1985 3 роки тому +39

    Jake, you’re doing a phenomenal impression of a 19th century steamship captain explaining how and why powered human flight is absolutely, undeniably, with out a doubt, completely impossible, period.

    • @paulcoy9060
      @paulcoy9060 3 роки тому +3

      "This new atomic bomb will not explode. I say this as an expert on explosives." -- Some guy who was really wrong.

    • @VonJay
      @VonJay 2 роки тому

      How did he do that?

    • @Dylans503
      @Dylans503 2 роки тому

      Pure criticism with no explanation. Let me guess, " you just got to belieeeeve!"

    • @MDC_1985
      @MDC_1985 2 роки тому

      @@Dylans503 False. It’s not that you have to believe, simply that it’s unwise to suggest something is impossible simply because you don’t understand how it could be. Take the 19th century steam boat captain I referred to as an example. If such a person were to say, “humans will never ever fly, it’s simply not possible”. He’d be wrong but supported by the science of his day. Were that same person to say “I cannot imagine circumstances in which a human could fly, but I can’t deny that it might one day be possible” he’d be wisely acknowledging that his understanding of the universe is not complete. Jake is assuming that the current accepted version of the universe, the accepted science, is never going to change and that it represents a complete and flawless understanding. Talk about hubris.

    • @Dylans503
      @Dylans503 2 роки тому

      @@MDC_1985 yes I get the comparison.... It's just that you're not explaining what is it that he said that you do not agree with. You mean as well use the defense of "anything is possible" anytime someone brings up physics.
      Can a cow jump over the moon? Maybe in the future right?

  • @tomkelly8827
    @tomkelly8827 2 роки тому +2

    I like the way you think, Jake. Very interesting to see how heavier elements are birthed. Certainly we know that uranium is a very heavy and very interesting element with special properties that no other element possesses. Thorium is almost as exciting as Uranium while Plutonium is far less stable and far more exciting then Uranium. It has me wondering what else is possible with the elements between 92 and 115 that we know of as well as 115 and beyond.
    This makes me think that space mining might just be much more worthwhile then I had considered before. I used to think it was just the same minerals but much farther away, but if there were antigravity minerals or something even beyond that...
    The possibilities are infinite!

    • @KindlyKalen
      @KindlyKalen 5 місяців тому

      Spoiler alert:
      Americium
      Curium
      Berkelium
      Californium
      Einsteinium
      Fermium
      Mendelevium
      Nobelium
      Rutherfordium
      Dubnium
      Seaborgium
      Bohrium
      Hassium
      Meitnerium
      Darmstadtium
      Roentgenium
      Copernicium
      Nihonium
      Flerovium
      Moscovium
      Livermorium
      Tennessine
      Oganesson

  • @jimzamerski
    @jimzamerski 2 роки тому

    If this were Minecraft, humans spawned on a gravelly mountain.
    All the aliens passing by look over like “meh”

  • @patrickcronin6829
    @patrickcronin6829 3 роки тому +11

    Why are you not talking about the “island of stability” posited for larger elements?

    • @daikucoffee5316
      @daikucoffee5316 3 роки тому +4

      Here’s another question: why did Bob Lazar not tell us about the number of neutrons in 115? If there is indeed a stable isotope with this specific atomic it would actually substantiate his claims.

    • @razeezar
      @razeezar 3 роки тому +3

      @@daikucoffee5316 The reason why Lazar chose 115 as the element for his story is because science magazines were already publishing material regarding this theorised "Island of Stability", many years before Bob ever came along making these claims.
      Bob, being a science nerd that he is, almost certainly read about this somewhere at some stage and filled in the blanks with his imagination.

    • @daikucoffee5316
      @daikucoffee5316 3 роки тому +1

      @@razeezar The funny thing is that so far no stable isotope has been discovered.

    • @razeezar
      @razeezar 3 роки тому

      @@daikucoffee5316 Those collider lab jockeys are clearly just not doing it right... They must be missing something from the recipe, such as cream of the tartar.
      Or perhaps was it the sauce?

  • @cannaroe1213
    @cannaroe1213 2 роки тому +42

    Just so everyone knows, the heaviest stable element (i.e. experience no decay whatsoever) is lead (82). Everything with a heavier weight is unstable via some sort of decay pathway. It was thought for a long time Bismuth (83) was the heaviest, but no, it has a half-life billions of times longer than the age of the universe, but technically it's still unstable. Uranium (92) is not stable for very long, while 115 was made and was found to be *very* unstable, as you'd expect from an even heavier atom. Adding/removing neutrons in the search for a more stable isotope is unlikely to be successful as isotopes are usually also less stable.

    • @32Rats
      @32Rats 2 роки тому +23

      Isotopes aren't "usually also less stable" unless you meant to leave out the "less" part. The first synthesized 115 was the 288 isotope with a half-life of 164 ms while the 290 isotope has a half-life of 650 ms. Very loosely speaking, heavier isotopes trend to be more stable but theres so many exceptions that it's not a very strong trend. Lead for example has 4 stable isotopes and they are on the lighter end, though not the lightest.
      Look up "superheavy elements island of stability" and you'll find a hypothesis that states that they could potentially be stable

    • @cannaroe1213
      @cannaroe1213 2 роки тому +15

      @@32Rats Thanks man i didn't know that and the island of stability is a really interestig read, thank you for taking the time to set me straight :)

    • @eddiecousinsjr
      @eddiecousinsjr 2 роки тому +2

      Except they have now predicted these stability islands at elements beyond 115 etc, kind of like resonate frequencies at different points following a wave like pattern, interesting stuff.

    • @flexygoo1295
      @flexygoo1295 2 роки тому +3

      Time moves slower when you move faster. Maybe the 115 moves super fast and can stay stable longer that way....I don't know. I don't build space ships

    • @Bic4Colours
      @Bic4Colours 2 роки тому +5

      @@flexygoo1295 Well maybe you should. Less doubt, more actions boy!

  • @newscoulomb3705
    @newscoulomb3705 2 роки тому

    11:05 If I recall correctly, Bob mentioned something about those emitters creating a bubble in space, similar to an Alcubierre drive.