The Book of the Covenant vs. The Book of the Law?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лип 2024
- There’s a growing theory among some Messianics (and a group in Hebrew Roots) that the Book of the Covenant and the Book of the Law are 2 different things; that part of the Torah no longer applies today. It’s time to test the pillars of this theory to see if it stands up to Scripture.
www.119ministries.com/support...
Follow the above link to partner with 119 Ministries and support ongoing free teaching production.
If you would like to discuss this video with us, we invite you to join the discussion on the teaching page found on our website or reach us privately through the Contact Us form on our website: 119ministries.com/contact-us
Thank you so much for your continued and prayerful support. May YHWH bless you and keep you.
Shalom
Shabbat Shalom!
Glory to The Holy One of Israel!!!
Shabbat Shalom. I personally find it very eye opening when after all these years I finally read the Bible for myself. Anyone else?
A lifetime of listening to a guy talk for 30-45 min once a week was all I had. Now? Wow.
Eyes in your own book revival anyone? I hope so.
Years of going to church was actually preventing me to know the whole truth..em so glad to know the truth before I die..so I can try to keep the word of God and pray for strength to keep God's commandments..God needs to be served with gladness, with love, appreciation, gratitude..not with us always wanting and asking for ourselves..worship with Thanksgiving..this life, no matter how difficult, we were given this privilege to be part of creation..it's pretty awesome ❤️
SHABBAT SHALOM 🙌🏽
I appreciate your teaching, as always. Thank you for your clear and concise approach.
Shabbat Shalom, great job as usual
It seems people will do anything to have a reason to not keep the Torah.
Great timing. I just had a discussion with those who teach this in the SDA church.
The IJ is what you guys should get rid of.
@@iguanapoolservice1461 What is the IJ?
@@NANA-fh6weinvestigative judgement doctrine of Ellen G. White
@@nickeleye7607 Thanks. I’ve never heard of that. I think the person replying mistook me for an SDA member
I bet you got real far on that lol. In my experience they never take on board and just ignore the subject until you go awAy. Have you read their book 'The Ten Commandments, twice Removed' ? It's a small book which has a dedicated to God law blessed, Moses Law curses, etc, etc.
Shabbat Shalom.
With respect this is not an issue I have spent a lot of time investigating. However, this video has gone some way to convince me this claim has genuine validity.
The same who gave the commandments at Sinai is The same that died on the wood for humanity,,,HE doesn't change.HIS commandments don't change
God died?
@@richardtarr8145
Do you want to understand or do you want to argue your point?
It will determine how this exchange progresses...
When you start loving יהוה with all your heart; there isn’t any room left for a messiah. אני אוהב יהוה בכל לבבי, אין כמוהו
These people are twisted, they claim clean/unclean are not for us yet in Genesis 7 clean/unclean were mentioned. Good truth.
Completely out of context my brother in Messiah Yeshua as I’m correcting you that Genesis 7 tells about how there were 7 pairs of clean animals and 2 unclean animals. Not two of everything was in the boat. God knows the purpose of these unclean animals and they are scavengers. God put them here to test our loyalty towards Yahweh.
So. We have mankind. Again. Trying to make excuses for why they do not have to obey the whole Word of God. Praying Yeshua returns quickly so HE can set everything and everyone straight! Save us from ourselves!
Shabbat shalom shalom.
I definitely have been blessed by this teaching. Thank you very much for your service!
I'm studying the Torah for several months now, slowly getting a glimpse of it's logic which differs very much from our Greek influenced logic.
And I appreciate very much you disdaining from dispensationalism which i detect in evangelical eschatology everywhere. Even so among messianic circles.
Perhaps this could be another topic you can pick up: "the day of the lord" in the OT😊
Shabbat Shalom!!
I heard a similar teaching from a brother that follows Torah and is a strong defender of the Way (including dietary laws and feasts being for us today). He did not include any of these other arguments mentioned in your video but was also in reference to Galatians 3 and just making a distinction between the eternal Covenant vs “The Book of the Law”. These were 2 convincing scriptures in Deuteronomy he used to illustrate this.
““These words the Lord spoke to all your assembly at the mountain out of the midst of the fire, the cloud, and the thick darkness, with a loud voice; and he added no more. And he wrote them on two tablets of stone and gave them to me.”
Deuteronomy 5:22 ESV
“Moses commanded the Levites who carried the ark of the covenant of the Lord, “Take this Book of the Law and put it by the side of the ark of the covenant of the Lord your God, that it may be there for a witness against you.”
Deuteronomy 31:25-26 ESV
Amen🙏
The BOOK OF THE COVENANT Is the Fulfillment of THE BOOK OF THE LAW. Both are Important.
The word law is fodder for the enemy.. it helps reborns to speak TORAH . Baby Steps.
They're the Same Book...
CAN YOU SHARE SCRIPTURE?
Yeshua didn't abolish the Law, He provided a way for man to fulfill the Law through His righteousness, which has been imputed to believers when we repent of our sins.
That's the good news of the gospel! Power to overcome sin through Christ!
Good stuff. 2 Kings 23:21 further makes the point...
This is an old teaching but while watching this time I had the thought in Hebrews it talks about the priesthood and the things on earth being a shadow of the heavenly priesthood and tabernacle. So doesn't that affirm what 119 ministries is saying, the priesthood was given to Aaron and shadows the heavenly.
It's not the Book of the Law that the NT is addressing when negative comments are given about it. It is the oral law that the NT is addressing when negative comments are given about it. No one in the entire Bible disparages God's law. They disparage and speak negatively about rabbinical law (man-made law).
Your argument that Yah established the priesthood before the golden calf and that means the priesthood was not as a result of the golden calf sin, does not necessarily mean that. Yah put in place a system that would address what was going to happen just like He put in place from creation the very day the Messiah would be born to address sin. He did both before the need even arose. Doesn't Hebrews 7-9 talk about the priesthood being inferior and only a shadow that will soon pass away? What was it a shadow for? Therefore, we can believe the priesthood only pointed to something that was going to happen. Meaning, the priesthood was a foreshadow of what our Messiah would do which was to be a mediator between man and God and to deal with sin. Therefore, logic dictates that sin is the cause of the need of the mediator.......sin is the cause of the need of the priesthood (shadow) and the Messiah (reality).
However, even this understanding does not separate the Book of the Covenant and Book of the Law into two different things therefore allowing people to ignore commands.
They are One and the Same, Exodus 20 - Deuteronomy 34. And most don't capture the understanding of the Levite Tribe and the Zadok Priesthood.
Shabbath Shalom! There are SDA here?
I never heard that teaching before but coming to understand by just reading God's word the book of the law is the blessings and curses the added Covenant Deuteronomy 29:1 the law of the curses which makes Galatians make sense and most of the New Testament which at the end of Joshua chapter 8 he wrote the book of the law on the rocks the blessing and the curses correct me if I'm wrong
Why is it that the dates for celebrating the Feast days are happening over a period of several weeks or months?
Here's how I answered that for my sister. Get a piece of paper and draw out the feast days on a line. The Gospel is laid out in the feast days. I believe these guys have a teaching on them.
4:50 that's close, but incorrect. The "written" law was never intended, so the "book of the covenant" was also a result of disobedience.
It is clear the priesthood of Isreal became wickedly corrupt and altered / added to the law of Moses (which is the genuine law of YHVH). This is the universal and consistent message of the Hebrew bible and is affirmed by the consistent teaching of Yeshua. The sacrificial system for the forgiveness of sin is the most obvious example of this. What indeed made John the Baptist so important and how did he prepare the way for the anointed one? He taught people that forgiveness of sins never required anyone to slaughter an animal. Rather a repentant heart, a change of behaviour accompanied by mikvah (baptism) was all that was required.
Doesn't make sense..."through angels through an intermediary". Paul is confusing.
@TheShutterbug1968 Saul of tarsus is very hard to completely understand. He is so learned in the torah and highly educated that his approach to these matters are so deep that if you don't fully know where he is in his knowledge surpasses most of us
@@learnandteacheverything I completely disagree. Jesus warned about Paul and not to follow such a person. Yet so many explain him away when he contradicts Jesus.
Always Paul being divisive..ALWAYS PAUL
And Peter for saying Paul is hard to understand. And Luke for giving weight to Paul in Acts.
Just not your added books.
@@advex4428Hard for those who don’t know Torah to understand and go into the error of torahlessness. Not hard for those who know the Torah and deny Saul. You people never address the elephant in the room which is why are people when they learn more Torah in much more detail then turn on Saul, because he fails the test of Deuteronomy 13. Peter was not endorsing Saul he was warning about him with feint praise and The Book of Acts is nothing more than a legal document.
This came at the right time. Matthew Nolan is a very convincing teacher, and has led many astray .I was one but with the help of a couple good, sharp men in the Scriptures, help me to to backoff from Matthew Nolan. He's a person how could deceive the very elect.
Could he be wrong concerning the BOL vs BOC, sure. However I’ve seen none of his teachings that would suggest he would deceive the elect. There is no need to slander Him for an error.