Thank you very much! I am working on neural coding, and this concept is indespensable for neural response function, which features Dirac's delta function (or Kroenecker's). I have been having a hard time wrapping my mind around the formulas, but you did an excellent job explaining the concept.
Thank you for this! I watched the mathematical video first and was completely lost. After watching this, the mathematical video makes sense! Subscribed.
@dhanoarajvir1 No, the video is showing that a system that multiplies its input by cos wt in the time domain is not time invariant. Because the system is not time invariant, we would have a difficult time computing the output of the system using convolution.
Thanks MJA, ive already taken Laplace transforms and process control and simulation... let just say this video didnt make it any easier to learn that witchcraft of a science... however it is cool and incredibly useful!
Type Invariance: Not every Animal[] can be treated as if it were a Cat[], an Animal[] may contain a Dog. A Cat[] cannot be treated as an Animal[], it should always be possible to put a Dog into an Animal[].
here he did one thing wrong ..... he is taking Y(t)=X(t) x COS(wt) (x means multiplication ) as here he is dealing in time domain...it should be Y(t)=X(t) * COS(wt) (* means convolution)
Set the video speed to 1.25
+Sean Dever That's much better, thanks
i use 2x and its a comfortable speed
Thank you very much! I am working on neural coding, and this concept is indespensable for neural response function, which features Dirac's delta function (or Kroenecker's). I have been having a hard time wrapping my mind around the formulas, but you did an excellent job explaining the concept.
Who would have thought that it was actually that simple. Nice work!
I have been coming across this 'LTI' term for quite a while and failed to understand what that was untill I bumped into this video! thanks!
Thank you for this! I watched the mathematical video first and was completely lost. After watching this, the mathematical video makes sense! Subscribed.
Thank you so much, sir! Your explanation is pretty clear and helped me understand this concept completely! Thanks again!!!
I love your videos! I like your low-key humor! I laughed out loud a few times! Thank you for this!!!!
Very nice conceptual explanation! Thanks a lot, Darryl
The guy who made this speaks in a time invariant manner
@dhanoarajvir1 No, the video is showing that a system that multiplies its input by cos wt in the time domain is not time invariant. Because the system is not time invariant, we would have a difficult time computing the output of the system using convolution.
Thanks, Darryl. Very intuitive. You should make more like this.
Wonderful explanation. Helped me a lot. Thanks!
this was so incredibly helpful thank you!!
Thank you very much for the super helpful explanation
Thanks a lot Sir, helped me understand the concepts for GATE exam.
I love these videos they have helped me alot. Its a good quick review. Keep it up.
very good explanation .
Frankly, This is nice explanation.... A lot of thanks...... :D
nice explaination
Thanks. that was very helpful!
wow, this is awesome and fun!
Thank you sir
I feel sleepy everytime i watch your videos...
Loved your videos. \M/
very good, thanks
Thanks!
can anyone help? so this is time invariant because you get them same result no matter the time period?
Thanks MJA, ive already taken Laplace transforms and process control and simulation... let just say this video didnt make it any easier to learn that witchcraft of a science... however it is cool and incredibly useful!
Can a system be linear but time variance?
Yes. An amplifier can be linear but it's performance can change (degrade) with time.
His example of cos(wt) is an example of a linear system that is time varying.
awsomee,,, thumbs up :)
thanks
Type Invariance:
Not every Animal[] can be treated as if it were a Cat[], an Animal[] may contain a Dog.
A Cat[] cannot be treated as an Animal[], it should always be possible to put a Dog into an Animal[].
here he did one thing wrong ..... he is taking Y(t)=X(t) x COS(wt) (x means multiplication )
as here he is dealing in time domain...it should be Y(t)=X(t) * COS(wt) (* means convolution)
can you speak any slower ommg!!