The Biggest Tripod! (Manfrotto 161MkII)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 21 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 20

  • @SilntObsvr
    @SilntObsvr 2 роки тому +2

    Ansel Adams used to take more than one mule, back when he was shooting 5x7 and 8x10 glass plates. Needed the heavy camera (a 5x7 in the 1930s weighed more than your 8x10, most likely), a biggish tripod for it, plus plate or film holders, and spare plates/film and provision for reloading the holders, plus his food and camping gear, plus at least one assistant's food and camping gear, plus feed for the mules... I think I recall he usually had *four* for a week-long expedition. Later, he shot off the top of his car (what we'd now call a large SUV) with a much more reasonable size tripod. I don't recall ever reading how he steadied the car enough for multi-second exposures...

  • @ralphturner7852
    @ralphturner7852 2 роки тому +4

    No good for backpacking? Um..surely, with the appropriate canvas, it would double up as a most excellent all-weather tent frame…😏. Btw thank you for vlogs, particularly the well balanced, methodical film reviews. Much appreciated.

  • @techietypex
    @techietypex 2 роки тому +2

    Never met a Manfrotto tripod I didn't like.

  • @l10industries
    @l10industries 2 роки тому +5

    I like big tripods and I can not lie...

  • @josephasghar
    @josephasghar 2 роки тому

    I had one for a while. Weighs a tonne. Definitely a studio tripod. Took it out with me for a shoot on public transport once - don’t remember much of that day.

  • @randallstewart175
    @randallstewart175 2 роки тому

    I have used the smaller version of this tripod for year with medium format cameras, mainly Pentax 67. Definitely not for hiking, but as i age, I find that most of my landscapes can be shot within 200 feet of the back of my car. IMO, if you are serious about retaining the sharpness your high end lenses can produce, you really need a larger, heavier tripod to hold everything still doing exposure. It looks like many people today select among the small, carbon fiber tripods for light weight and many leg sections, which are the two worst "features" you need from a tripod, apart from carting it around.

  • @BobOgden1
    @BobOgden1 2 роки тому +1

    I have never understood the prices for tripods. They seem well out of line for the materials, manufacture and quality

    • @AppleGameification
      @AppleGameification 2 роки тому

      make your own then :)

    • @BobOgden1
      @BobOgden1 2 роки тому +1

      @@AppleGameification I have been toying with the idea of building a studio camera stand similar to the one built by the channel "rotary SMP"

  • @rumorscameras
    @rumorscameras 11 місяців тому

    Why??

  • @ryang112
    @ryang112 2 роки тому

    Watch out for the overhead power lines!

  • @discophil6726
    @discophil6726 2 роки тому +1

    Just picked up a mk1 version of this for £45 lol. Bargain. Plan is to use it for astrophotography tripod. Well chuffed!.. its a lot bigger than i thought it was from looking at the ebay auction 🤣

  • @TobyGobi
    @TobyGobi 2 роки тому

    I believe the Navaho used this for their teepee frame!

  • @melaninxhalide1165
    @melaninxhalide1165 2 роки тому

    THANK YOU!!!!

  • @Adrian-wd4rn
    @Adrian-wd4rn 2 роки тому +1

    I take it a tripod of this stature would be utter over kill for my 4x5 speed graphic? lol.

  • @Aikisbest
    @Aikisbest Місяць тому

    At this height Id be more worried about the person than the camera (probably not to be honest, but you get what I mean)

  • @iamoneface3852
    @iamoneface3852 Місяць тому

    Do you use a ladder to connect the camera 🤣

  • @Lebenspiel
    @Lebenspiel 2 роки тому

    This is nothing. Recommend a tripod which can handle Pentacon Six's shutter and mirror shock, because every time I press the trigger, it's like nuclear blast

    • @brycepinson8641
      @brycepinson8641 2 роки тому

      really? I have the forerunner, the praktisix II... it's really not bad at all.