Conceptual understanding of flux in three dimensions | Multivariable Calculus | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024
  • Courses on Khan Academy are always 100% free. Start practicing-and saving your progress-now: www.khanacadem...
    Conceptual understanding of flux across a two-dimensional surface
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacadem...
    Missed the previous lesson?
    www.khanacadem...
    Multivariable Calculus on Khan Academy: Think calculus. Then think algebra II and working with two variables in a single equation. Now generalize and combine these two mathematical concepts, and you begin to see some of what Multivariable calculus entails, only now include multi dimensional thinking. Typical concepts or operations may include: limits and continuity, partial differentiation, multiple integration, scalar functions, and fundamental theorem of calculus in multiple dimensions.
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy’s Multivariable Calculus channel:
    / channel
    Subscribe to KhanAcademy: www.youtube.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 44

  • @hadijaffri9856
    @hadijaffri9856 3 роки тому +14

    Man i swear this guy knows everything.I have been listening to his lectures from 10th grade,now im in university.Is this dude sheldon cooper with a masculine voice?

  • @wyatttomlinson3475
    @wyatttomlinson3475 2 роки тому +4

    This video singlehandedly made flux cool! Thank you so much Sal! This semester of Calculus 3, you have made the concepts simple to grasp, sure, but more importantly, fascinating!

  • @ritabratochatterjee6881
    @ritabratochatterjee6881 3 роки тому +4

    Khan academy is one of the several sources from where I happen to get the most authentic lectures on topics. Thank you.

  • @TheTokyoExpress
    @TheTokyoExpress 12 років тому +56

    you only hate it because you had teachers that were poor at teaching it

  • @geetarwanabe
    @geetarwanabe 12 років тому +5

    If you throw the ball perpendicular to the wall (100% in the normal direction) then your dot product F(dot)n would be 1, result in no loss in your mass flux so 100% of your ball would pass in say 1s
    If you throw a ball at an angle, say 10*,then your dot proct would result in (0.92 at a guess)so only 92% of your ball will pass through in the same time period
    So yes, the same amount of mass would eventually pass through but the flux has changed. Its reduced. So we are only interested in normal.

  • @johnmesserly4051
    @johnmesserly4051 10 років тому +56

    you're so good at drawing things jesus

    • @musataz
      @musataz 7 років тому +1

      yep he is but what did he draw here?

    • @brothertrucker4820
      @brothertrucker4820 7 років тому +18

      he was talking about Jesus and how good he can draw

  • @salmagamal5676
    @salmagamal5676 6 років тому +5

    my love and gratitude for this channel is just infinite

  • @SalsaTiger83
    @SalsaTiger83 12 років тому +6

    The vectors that are orthogonal to the surface normal are "on" the surface, so if a partical travels on them, it doesn't "flux" through the surface. (I might be wrong, I'm no physicist)

    • @ManojKumar-cj7oj
      @ManojKumar-cj7oj 3 роки тому

      You're absolutely correct, bcuz I'm a physicist 😁

  • @starRushi
    @starRushi 2 роки тому

    Explanation for flux, if you don't understand it.
    So two ways of understanding the relationship between mass and volume
    Both say much mass is in a given volume
    But one evaluates the volume using density [measuring three dimensions of space] and the other using flux [two dimensions of space, one of _time_ ].

  • @gavi7v
    @gavi7v 9 років тому +54

    3 50 minute lectures summed up in 8 minutes

  • @cravenhammock5401
    @cravenhammock5401 12 років тому +3

    The one aspect I don't understand intuitively is taking the dot product. Why is it that the part of the flux (F) which is orthogonal to the surface normal (n) is excluded (by taking the dot product.
    If I throw a ball through a doorway at an angle other than the doorway's normal its entire mass still passes through that surface.

    • @adityaprasad465
      @adityaprasad465 5 років тому +1

      Imagine a volume of water flowing through that door. If it's not flowing normal to it, then _less_ mass gets through.

  • @Civsuccess2
    @Civsuccess2 12 років тому +16

    Flux capacitor!!!! Great Scott!!!

    • @RougeSamurai77
      @RougeSamurai77 7 років тому

      Wow, this comment is old.

    • @lamp0
      @lamp0 3 роки тому +2

      @@RougeSamurai77 Wow, this comment is old

    • @raphaelramos4016
      @raphaelramos4016 3 роки тому

      Wow, this comment is old

    • @rogacz935
      @rogacz935 Рік тому

      @@raphaelramos4016 wow this comment is old

    • @midnightsun1429
      @midnightsun1429 6 місяців тому

      @@rogacz935 wow this comment is old

  • @ilikefootballandbaddecisions
    @ilikefootballandbaddecisions Рік тому +1

    Thank you!!!

  • @geetarwanabe
    @geetarwanabe 12 років тому

    When you take the dot product you are seeing exactly how much ( or I guess you could say "what component" ) of your vector is pointing in the DIRECTION of the dotted vector.
    Lay your head on a desk, place your hand off and to the side of it. Raise your hand vertically, then repeat at some angle. Notice how the speed at which your hand is rising has changed i.e some component is orthogonal, REDUCING the mass flux that is normal.
    So F.n tells your how much mass is leaving/entering your surface

  • @syabongajele6431
    @syabongajele6431 3 роки тому

    thank you

  • @arsalansyed4709
    @arsalansyed4709 3 роки тому

    holy crapp!!!! Thank you so much!!!!

  • @stephenma5563
    @stephenma5563 4 роки тому

    this is awesome!

  • @TheMornom
    @TheMornom 9 років тому +1

    awesome explanation.

  • @andrerossa8553
    @andrerossa8553 5 років тому

    nice, tks

  • @NeedSaltForFries
    @NeedSaltForFries 12 років тому

    excuse me, Mr Khan, but can you please do a module on a simple paradox?

  • @alexander-p1f
    @alexander-p1f 3 місяці тому

    is F a vector field?

  • @harshithatwal8293
    @harshithatwal8293 6 років тому

    and to understand electric flux

  • @vipeshrajput
    @vipeshrajput 11 років тому

    gud intuition

  • @amitt111
    @amitt111 10 років тому +1

    i loveee you !
    thanks alot !!!

  • @joerosati5017
    @joerosati5017 6 років тому

    not bad

  • @harshithatwal8293
    @harshithatwal8293 6 років тому +1

    which chapters should i study to understand what is double integral please reply sir ............................

  • @madhavbovilla7363
    @madhavbovilla7363 7 років тому

    video is just appearing as green screen though the explanation is pretty good

  • @VinothKumar-qo7ry
    @VinothKumar-qo7ry 7 років тому

    Nice

  • @HockeyMan-kd7yj
    @HockeyMan-kd7yj 6 років тому

    Should be titled "5minuteFlux"

  • @yuri778
    @yuri778 12 років тому +2

    Gah I hate physics....but at least I learned something.

  • @dapianoman03
    @dapianoman03 11 років тому +2

    great explanation, but this guy repeats things too much

  • @neilzep
    @neilzep 12 років тому

    4 th comment