Editor's Note: The initial version of this video mentioned the lack of gain control on the Saramonic system. This was incorrect, and the offending portion has been removed.
In Hollyland you have a curved line that acts as an arrow indicating where the microphone is. Hollyland also offer budle ( the price is only slightly higher ) with 2 more receivers for USB C and Lightning. Base on price vs performance Hollyland wins
Just a tip for the Hollylark Lark 2 with the windscreen on. There is a small arrow on the back that shows where the mic is, it is just hard to see because it is all the same color. I filled in the arrow with silver sharpie and it helps a lot.
Yeah, I’m listening to Jordan talk about how the Shure has the best sound quality, and I’m like….did he listen to this at all? It sounds horrible. The Hollyland and Shure are nearly indistinguishable from each other and appear to have a very high noise floor.
I think it must have been a settings error, issue with the import, or UA-cam upload problem. I’ve heard the Hollyland on a Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) video before (I think a car review) and was reasonably impressed given its size.
Well, Curtis Judd just published a review on the Shure system on his UA-cam channel. Haven’t watched it but he’s an audio guy primarily so he’d catch any issues with self noise.
The mic direction of the Lark M2 is an easy fix using their ridiculous stickers included in the box. I've cut an arrow out of the white one and used for indicating where the actual mic side is. The dead cat is really the industry worst I'm still figuring what to do about it. I've already lost the bloody thing once - fortunately someone picked it up and handed over. Sony users beware, it produces very strong output volume so in the camera you have to turn the volume down to 1 or else your recording will be screwed up.
Great video. I think the biggest feature is reliable audio, over subtle differences in EQ. Fo that, something that records as backup, and knowing it can work in RF hostile environments. So that'd be the DJI and the Rode- which I had used on the NAB show floor, multiple wireless systems, at the same time, and there was zero dropout.
I bought these Hollylands as soon as they came out. The magnet on the back is round and as such, it can be rotated any which direction. It was just by sheer dumb luck that they had their clip magnetized to the mic in an upward position. That's why it appeared like it was marked where the mic is. With that said, I've NEVER used the windscreen on any of my mic sets (I have 4 different sets) so that issue probably will never affect me. I LOVE these Hollylands especially cause they come with necklace/lanyard attachments. It's so nice to use on sets where I have to swap mics between people real fast.
@@smc1377 they do seem neat and they sound good. I'm not a fan of the logo taking up the entire button though. I got the Hollyland Lark Max sometime last year they have been so versatile. I needed quick audio recently and didn't have time to setup lavs. I just slapped the mics the the metal frame of a table and it worked well enough.
I think you're right the Shure and the DJI are definitely the most compelling options, I'm surprised how versatile the DJI mics are, I had no idea, worth a very serious consideration.
A tutorial on how you treat the signals in post, would be very interesting. When I tried a first time external mic, I was shocked by the sound of it. So now I don’t have one anymore. But in the meantime I learned that audiacity has a couple of filters and effects, and there my sound is better. So how would you treat the raw signal of the external mics, tat would interest me very much. :-)
Wireless microphone reviews may be a smaller audience, but this was a great comparison and I would love even more video-focused videos (including discussing workflows) from Jordan. Let's call it "Jordan Explains it All".
It's worth noting that when the DJI Mic 2 is used with the Pocket 3 camera it seems to use BlueTooth as the connection so it has quite limited range when compared to using it with the separate receiver unit.
To my ears, the Rode sounded the best. I live in Chicago and drive by the Shure HQ in Skokie frequently, and tend to buy their products whenever possible if competitive. The high price, lack of being kitted like the others, and audio quality has probably ruled them out for me. I love the DJI featureset, but the audio was not doing it for me. When I make me decision, it will be the 'features' pick. However, if I'm going off the samples I've heard, it's the Rode. Not saying the Rode is perfect, but it feels really neutral and lacks a tininess/hollowness. I feel like with a slight EQ it will sound fantastic.
My company shoots with the DJI ronin 4D and we found that if the video transmitter module is installed on the camera but we do not have the wireless video monitor connected and powered on we get quite a bit of feedback on our wireless mics. Maybe that explains the issues you had with the Rode? As soon as the wireless video monitor is powered on and connected to the cam, all the audio feedback disappears.
To me, shure sounded the 2nd worst, only better than the saramonic. The DJI and Rode sounded much better than the rest. I would probably go for the Rode but you can't go wrong with either of the two
A few months ago bought a Hollyland Lark Max Duo ... and a love it... small mic units (lav inputs, 8 GB internal 24 bit/ 48 kHz recording) and a great receiver (i can all parameter remotely change), charging case and 2 lav mic also in the package... and it's now 250 USD The last weekend i recorded a theater performance, so that the two transmitter put the ground of the stage floor. I was 15 meter far away the mics... and no interference, no dropouts... the auditorium was full... tons of smartphones, a few WiFi systems in the area. Because the mics characteristic is cardioid therefore the actors voice undertstandable and the audiences claps and reactions was a little bit quieter. I am so very happy with this set... it is easy to install... and i a want then setup so that the internal recording started automatically... and with one charging it's run more than 6 hours.
Speaking as an audio professional and someone who works for an audio company where quality is everything, the Rode is the only one that sounds great to my ear on this video. The frequency response is flat and neutral sounding with low noise. All of the others, even Shure's, sound awful. Noise level is awful. There's noticeable missing frequencies, too.
Same!! Im opting for hollyland because its soo portable and plug and play which I need for my usecase(online meetings and vocal recordings), but the Rode's warmth makes me want to lean towards it even though it'll make my setup more bulky.
@@JackieDElia it seems like the audio quality overall degraded. The noise cancelling feature ruins the vocals as well. I bought the rode wireless pro for the threaded input but use the DJI mic still for a lot of things.
@@PagosaCreative Oh, the Mic 2 _absolutely_ has far worse audio quality than the first one. It's so, so weird how few people have ever mentioned it considering how obvious it is.
Have you guys tried the sennheiser AVX setup? I just switched to the DJI mic 2 for most of my shoots, but the auto gain control on the AVX is still second to none. I’m torn, I wish the DJI mic 2 had auto gain control - but it’s way easier to use and has internal recording. Thoughts? Or do you have a version of this video that’s more focused on professional-grade gear, rather than prosumer?
Have you heard of or worked with the PicoGear lav system? As far as low profile goes, I feel like these are the most discreet. But I haven't used as many mic systems as you so it would be great to know how they compare.
AS someone who works with unedited video and audio all day, I agree. The hiss is something that's hard to find in many reviews, and something that matters to me as a creator.
This was a very useful review of an extremely relevant topic. It answered all my questions except this one: When are we going to see Chris's Thypoc Simera (09:41) review?
I bought the previous Hollyland version with the charging case but it would actually go flat in a really short time and drain the kit inside it too so unless you charged it right before the shoot it was super risky to rely on. I quickly replaced it of course!
I like to imagine that you just left Chris out in the snow talking about a bunch of lenses and he’s just gradually getting colder and colder while you’re warm and inside making this video 😂
It’s funny some others say the Shure is the worst sounding and here they say it’s better. Hearing it on the videos it sounds more muted and muffled to me.
As a camera sling user, every millimeter counts. I wish you would have made precise dimensional comparisons in this video. For example, holding each mic and receiver next to its competitor to show small differences in height, length and width. Personally, when I am shopping for gear and my choices are close in features and price... I always buy the smaller option for portability.
The fact you can pull real-world use examples of most/all of these from your already published videos is a fantastic bit of effort and proof that you guys really take testing gear seriously
You missed off the one decent mars hollyland system, (stay tuned to a new product soon), what I'd like to know Chris is the post process on the dji mic 2,s you use please.
Wasn't featured directly in this video, but I had a similar issue with wireless interference on my RODE Wireless GO IIs a couple years back. Shot an interview in a small business and had to move her iPad cash register and wireless card reader because it was causing a hum on the receiver a few feet away. Still liked using them overall.
Jordan, try out the Hollyland Lark Max if you have a chance. Its got internal recording, a lot more features aiming towards more advanced user like yourself. The lark m2 is nice but really targetiing very beginner users and have a lot of limitations and compromises. i only use the lark max myself even i have both
Would have loved to see you include the PicoMic 2 Pro in this round up to see how it compares. It chargers with the receiver and you can attach lav mics. The only weakness is that it doesn't do onboard recording, but it has one market advantage of being the most discreet and hidden mic which is something that isn't as valued for UA-camrs. For creators doing corporate or client based videos, having a DJI mic hanging on the shirt is unacceptable.
I use the Røde Wireless Go II. It's a little older than the Go Pro and didn't come with a charging case. I had to buy one from a third party maker. But the sound quality is very good, I can adjust the levels, and the deadcat goes on much easier than with the original Wireless Go. I see no reason to upgrade to the Pro model
Ironic that your voice clips at 0:06 on the word DUAL (and elsewhere throughout the review) on a video about sound quality 😛Thanks for comparing so many models but it looked biaised toward Shure. I am used to more in-depth reviews from you guys. Many important features were not specified. The Lark M2 has impressive environmental noise reduction and is available is different packages. The 32bit float recording on the Wireless Pro is game changer and the kit comes with 2 nice lavalier microphones. And yes, the Saramonic sounds like poop. The Shure has no internal recording, is expensive for the specs and doenst stand out in sound quality.
If deciding on a first wireless lav, the DJI Mic2 if happen to already have the Pocket3 or the Action4. The pocket3 is a nice improvement in the pocket line.
On the Hollyland transmitter there is a symbol that shows were the mic capsule is at the back :) so, when using the wind shield, you can tell were it is
Great video, in your opinion would the DJI or Shure be capable as Lavalier for a wedding ceremony and play the signal to a blue tooth speaker? Would you trust them? Are those two 2.4 ghz signal or better? Thanks, Greg
The Sennehiser system does have rechargeable lithium batteries by default though maybe the transmitters don't have these by default. This is based on Sennheisers page for their EW-DP EK. Also on the Shure system there was noticeable additional noise from it.
Honestly DJI always nails those user friendly industrial designs, ui designs and wireless signal. This makes them really unbeatable in multiple different markets.
always luv'd ya guys from back in the day, although I have not seen any of your content in a long while I do notice that like with a fine wine comes a bit of loss of that freshness (some of your video is a little out of focus ;) especially at the start I suppose either you forgot and used the manual option or the focus auto was not set to follow your eyes instead your sweater remains in best focus, not upset with you it's okay... from one trained eye to another lol
I bought the Shure set recently and love the sound. I think Curtis Judd is the only one to mention the internal compressor, but that can make a huge difference for quick turn around. At the same time it is a fussy product. The firmware update process is fussy, time consuming, very old school, and designed around large production environments where you need to push firmware updates out on a network (not beginner friendly). The mics themselves are small and internal recording isn’t an issue because I have other equipment for that when needed. But transmitter clips are very small and do not have a magnet option, so if you need to clip this to a hoody or jacket collar, it may not stay put all that well. On the other hand, if you’re doing a bunch of corporate interviews (with people wearing dressier clothes), as long as you clip with the battery inside the shirt or blouse then these are quick to put on and off as well as being very inconspicuous. Bottom line, for certain kinds of direct-to-camera quick turn around commercial work, the Shure set will be a huge improvement over dealing with traditional lav systems. Or if you want to record direct to your phone (please Shure, make your mics compatible with the Blackmagic iPhone app!) with higher fidelity, it’s a great system. Those who need the Shure setup will know it. Would I recommend them to a beginner? Probably not.
so funny how extremely the opinion differs. Fstopppers says the Saramonic sounds best, the Shure the Worst. PetaPixels says Saramonic sounds worst, the Shure the Best. Well I doubted Fstoppers already before, something felt off. The only thing that confuses me is the pretty loud hiss throughout this whole video. I've used a bunch of these Mics and the hiss in normal use without any post processing wasn't nearly as bad, hmmm. Personally I've switched from the Rode Wireless Go (1st gen) to the Fulaim X5, paid a little over 100€. It has internal recording, 2 transmitters, a good enough case, usb-c and lightning dongle, a very good internal mic, jack for an external mic etc. There's really no need to pay more if you're an amateur. And even the more expensive solutions don't really work better in most normal situtations
I’m in a bit over my head have both Rode and DJi! The Rode is not Pro, but the cheaper ME, needs an app to make adjustments, but that’s okay. However I struggled attaching the receiver when using the gimbal. SO I bought the DJi Mic 2 just the transmitter! Great for a one man operation simple setup!
Hello DP, my gripe with Rode system is that it totally unusable over distance conversations. You have to stay within natural hearing distance if you want a two way conversation. My Rode Me is truly a Me and not a We. Thank you for your review, Frans
The DJI is impressive. One thing I notice though is that it only comes with 2 windsocks whereas the Rode comes with 3. What happens if you lose one? I did a search to see if you could get just the windsock but couldn't find one.
I would like to know which system have a replaceable battery? I don’t want a paper weight in a few years. Even if I need to disassemble and do some light soldering.
You might want to check out the ULANZI AM18. It seems quite similar to the saramonic but its a bit cheaper and it has a mini jack input if you want to use a lavalier.
Thank you so much for your great videos. A question.... What do you do if you want to interview one person with LAV and transmit the signal to two cameras? Meaning One transmitter to Two Receivers. Thank you again.
I've been happy so far with the audio quality from the Hollyland, but my big complaint is that the receiver doesn't really fit the hotshoe of my Fuji X-T4. It kinda jams in there, but I can't really push it in all the way securely. I've thought about filing it down a bit to fit, but it seems like I shouldn't have to do that. Anyone else have this trouble?
DJI seams like a better choice. But for run and gun situation, especially as the summer is coming, this mics are heavy and Shure is to expensive, Lark M2 it might be a better deal, since they are very light and they sound good. What do you think?
Im setting up a live stream for my church and need to capture the pastor as well as the music and ambience from the congregation. I am getting a yahama mixer and going to be using a canon r6 M2. What is the best way you think to get the best sound?
At least in this video, the Røde sounded the best to my likings. Could also be settings etc, but there is something about that Røde sound that sounds more appealing to me
The Hollyland Lark transmitters have tiny arrows on the back pointing to the mic opening. A Dan of paint in the arrow makes it very easy to see. I bought it and the AnkerWork M650 because they are small, round and can be put in the chin of a motorcycle helmet. The square or rectangle shaped ones are a nightmare to try to put in a helmet so they will never be an option for me. The Hollyland Lark system works best in a helmet.
This is a real nice, concise, breakdown. Would it be possible to explore some UHF options as well? I know they're much more expensive and aren't for the masses, but your in the field and professional experiences would be great to hear if you have any!
Have been curious about the Hollyland because they are just so small and you just don't always notice them. I get it if you need a lavalier but then if you are going that route there are so many other options available including a bunch not listed here. Feel like in this market it really shouldn't be about the lavalier availability.
I know that this might be subjective but I thought that the Shure mic didn't sound that good. I have watched several reviews on the wireless mics and every time I think that the Rode sounds much better than the others for vocals. That is why I bought them and am happy with them.
It’s clear that the optimal choice for me is to keep my older Saramonic Blinks, which actually do have a 3.5mm jack on each transmitter, as well as input volume control, and thus produce very nice sound. Why they removed those two features on the B2s is an enigma 😑
The shure kit looks way too expensive for a plastic body with no 3.5mm input and no 32 bit recording. I'd expect more features for that outlay. It's the DJI or the Rode for my money.
Good run through these options, but have you guys even tried the DJi Mic 2 Bluetooth option? I made a video about this when it came out, hoping the bluetooth feature could cut down on gear to bring, but The audio quality is *really* bad on iPhone connecting directly with bluetooth. To make matters worse the DJI Mic 2’s internal recording feature is disabled when connecting to smartphones via bluetooth - so it’s not really a valid selling point at all :/
Strange, I watched the comparison of these same microphones on Fstoppers, and their Shure mic turned out to be the worst, of the bunch. I think you guys should check out that video as well before making a purchase decision
Editor's Note: The initial version of this video mentioned the lack of gain control on the Saramonic system. This was incorrect, and the offending portion has been removed.
Thank you for the clarification.
In Hollyland you have a curved line that acts as an arrow indicating where the microphone is. Hollyland also offer budle ( the price is only slightly higher ) with 2 more receivers for USB C and Lightning. Base on price vs performance Hollyland wins
@@Sebartus There's also an arrow where the magnet is that points where the mic is aiming
Just a tip for the Hollylark Lark 2 with the windscreen on. There is a small arrow on the back that shows where the mic is, it is just hard to see because it is all the same color. I filled in the arrow with silver sharpie and it helps a lot.
It's very obvious, not sure why he was being as obnoxious as he seemed to be about it.
Is it just me or the Hollyland and the Shure have a lot of self noise?
Yeah, I’m listening to Jordan talk about how the Shure has the best sound quality, and I’m like….did he listen to this at all? It sounds horrible. The Hollyland and Shure are nearly indistinguishable from each other and appear to have a very high noise floor.
I think it must have been a settings error, issue with the import, or UA-cam upload problem. I’ve heard the Hollyland on a Marques Brownlee (MKBHD) video before (I think a car review) and was reasonably impressed given its size.
I've seen multiple videos with the Hollyland, but mostly in noisy environments or with background music. I agree, though, it sounds good.
I think the gain setting problem, mine has no lot of noise like that
Well, Curtis Judd just published a review on the Shure system on his UA-cam channel. Haven’t watched it but he’s an audio guy primarily so he’d catch any issues with self noise.
The mic direction of the Lark M2 is an easy fix using their ridiculous stickers included in the box. I've cut an arrow out of the white one and used for indicating where the actual mic side is. The dead cat is really the industry worst I'm still figuring what to do about it. I've already lost the bloody thing once - fortunately someone picked it up and handed over. Sony users beware, it produces very strong output volume so in the camera you have to turn the volume down to 1 or else your recording will be screwed up.
Great video.
I think the biggest feature is reliable audio, over subtle differences in EQ. Fo that, something that records as backup, and knowing it can work in RF hostile environments. So that'd be the DJI and the Rode- which I had used on the NAB show floor, multiple wireless systems, at the same time, and there was zero dropout.
It sort of looks like the Hollyland's have a marker on the back that shows where the mic is facing. I could be mistaken.
I bought these Hollylands as soon as they came out. The magnet on the back is round and as such, it can be rotated any which direction. It was just by sheer dumb luck that they had their clip magnetized to the mic in an upward position. That's why it appeared like it was marked where the mic is.
With that said, I've NEVER used the windscreen on any of my mic sets (I have 4 different sets) so that issue probably will never affect me. I LOVE these Hollylands especially cause they come with necklace/lanyard attachments. It's so nice to use on sets where I have to swap mics between people real fast.
@@smc1377 they do seem neat and they sound good. I'm not a fan of the logo taking up the entire button though. I got the Hollyland Lark Max sometime last year they have been so versatile. I needed quick audio recently and didn't have time to setup lavs. I just slapped the mics the the metal frame of a table and it worked well enough.
@@SooksVI The M2's come with custom stickers that you can slap over the logo on the button mics. So it's just all black. No branding at all.
@smc1377 oh wow, that's great
I think you're right the Shure and the DJI are definitely the most compelling options, I'm surprised how versatile the DJI mics are, I had no idea, worth a very serious consideration.
A tutorial on how you treat the signals in post, would be very interesting.
When I tried a first time external mic, I was shocked by the sound of it. So now I don’t have one anymore. But in the meantime I learned that audiacity has a couple of filters and effects, and there my sound is better.
So how would you treat the raw signal of the external mics, tat would interest me very much. :-)
Wireless microphone reviews may be a smaller audience, but this was a great comparison and I would love even more video-focused videos (including discussing workflows) from Jordan. Let's call it "Jordan Explains it All".
It's worth noting that when the DJI Mic 2 is used with the Pocket 3 camera it seems to use BlueTooth as the connection so it has quite limited range when compared to using it with the separate receiver unit.
To my ears, the Rode sounded the best.
I live in Chicago and drive by the Shure HQ in Skokie frequently, and tend to buy their products whenever possible if competitive. The high price, lack of being kitted like the others, and audio quality has probably ruled them out for me.
I love the DJI featureset, but the audio was not doing it for me. When I make me decision, it will be the 'features' pick. However, if I'm going off the samples I've heard, it's the Rode.
Not saying the Rode is perfect, but it feels really neutral and lacks a tininess/hollowness. I feel like with a slight EQ it will sound fantastic.
My company shoots with the DJI ronin 4D and we found that if the video transmitter module is installed on the camera but we do not have the wireless video monitor connected and powered on we get quite a bit of feedback on our wireless mics. Maybe that explains the issues you had with the Rode? As soon as the wireless video monitor is powered on and connected to the cam, all the audio feedback disappears.
4:58 not sure why he has a problem with the Hollyland's wind screen? You can see a sort of arrow on the clip, which indicates the side of the mic.
Rode and DJI sounded the best. The Shure didn't sound good with a lot of noise; Hollyland was noisy too, but sounded better than the Shure.
someone finally said it! the Shure has terrible sound tbvh
shure and first one was not good.
To me, shure sounded the 2nd worst, only better than the saramonic. The DJI and Rode sounded much better than the rest. I would probably go for the Rode but you can't go wrong with either of the two
Fstoppers had a very different opinion on the Shure, which I find remarkable. You had any connection issues with it?
A few months ago bought a Hollyland Lark Max Duo ... and a love it... small mic units (lav inputs, 8 GB internal 24 bit/ 48 kHz recording) and a great receiver (i can all parameter remotely change), charging case and 2 lav mic also in the package... and it's now 250 USD
The last weekend i recorded a theater performance, so that the two transmitter put the ground of the stage floor. I was 15 meter far away the mics... and no interference, no dropouts... the auditorium was full... tons of smartphones, a few WiFi systems in the area.
Because the mics characteristic is cardioid therefore the actors voice undertstandable and the audiences claps and reactions was a little bit quieter.
I am so very happy with this set... it is easy to install... and i a want then setup so that the internal recording started automatically... and with one charging it's run more than 6 hours.
Speaking as an audio professional and someone who works for an audio company where quality is everything, the Rode is the only one that sounds great to my ear on this video. The frequency response is flat and neutral sounding with low noise. All of the others, even Shure's, sound awful. Noise level is awful. There's noticeable missing frequencies, too.
Same!! Im opting for hollyland because its soo portable and plug and play which I need for my usecase(online meetings and vocal recordings), but the Rode's warmth makes me want to lean towards it even though it'll make my setup more bulky.
Hollyland Lark Max Duo is great with some drawbacks, most glaring is the screen saver on the receiver that goes extremely dark and hard to monitor.
For someone on a budget honestly, the best system right now is the DJI Mic 1 system. So so good.
Yes, that's a good point. Especially since the Mic 2 came out there's a lot of used ones for good prices.
I agree. That is what I have and will not be upgrading to the v2.
@@JackieDElia it seems like the audio quality overall degraded. The noise cancelling feature ruins the vocals as well. I bought the rode wireless pro for the threaded input but use the DJI mic still for a lot of things.
But there are a few budget options nowadays right? Even with internal recording like the ulanzi
@@PagosaCreative Oh, the Mic 2 _absolutely_ has far worse audio quality than the first one. It's so, so weird how few people have ever mentioned it considering how obvious it is.
I am glad fstoppers and petapixel came upon the same problem half a day apart. It cannot be easy wanting a two mic system in march.
Have you guys tried the sennheiser AVX setup? I just switched to the DJI mic 2 for most of my shoots, but the auto gain control on the AVX is still second to none.
I’m torn, I wish the DJI mic 2 had auto gain control - but it’s way easier to use and has internal recording. Thoughts? Or do you have a version of this video that’s more focused on professional-grade gear, rather than prosumer?
Have you heard of or worked with the PicoGear lav system? As far as low profile goes, I feel like these are the most discreet. But I haven't used as many mic systems as you so it would be great to know how they compare.
Based on the self noise alone I'm going with the Rode system. All the others had WAY more noise.. and the dji sounded hollow.
Love the look and sound of the M2, but note that its mono-only over USB. You can't get left and right signals separately unless you use the 3.5 jack
Great review, Jordan! I appreciate not editing out the hiss from all the recordings. What do you do to control it when editing the videos?
AS someone who works with unedited video and audio all day, I agree. The hiss is something that's hard to find in many reviews, and something that matters to me as a creator.
Nice video Jordan. Please do more video about video!! Those first 2 systems were rough. I love the way the DJI sounds!
This was a very useful review of an extremely relevant topic. It answered all my questions except this one: When are we going to see Chris's Thypoc Simera (09:41) review?
I'm quite interested in this lens. 28mm f1.4 I'm guessing. 🥰
I bought the previous Hollyland version with the charging case but it would actually go flat in a really short time and drain the kit inside it too so unless you charged it right before the shoot it was super risky to rely on. I quickly replaced it of course!
Did you normalize difrent mics signal? volume is jumping all over and it making it hard to compare audio quality.
I like to imagine that you just left Chris out in the snow talking about a bunch of lenses and he’s just gradually getting colder and colder while you’re warm and inside making this video 😂
There’s an arrow on the back of Hollyland Lark M2 so you can see where mic is. You could also mark on your own.
I've been using the Hollyland Lark Max for sometime now & very pleased with it.
RODE sounds the best to my ears. But DJI connects so easily to my OP3 and OA4. Lots of great options at reasonable price points.
🤡
It’s funny some others say the Shure is the worst sounding and here they say it’s better. Hearing it on the videos it sounds more muted and muffled to me.
As a camera sling user, every millimeter counts. I wish you would have made precise dimensional comparisons in this video. For example, holding each mic and receiver next to its competitor to show small differences in height, length and width. Personally, when I am shopping for gear and my choices are close in features and price... I always buy the smaller option for portability.
What is the title of the track you used for your intro and where did you find ? Audiio?
I use the Hollyland Lark Max 2 and very happy about it.
You missed out on a few other contemporary direct competitors. Godox, Neewer and Ulanzi all have solutions in this market segment.
What's the camera on the table?
Asking the real questions ;)
Not sure if anyone mentioned previously, but the Lark M2 has an arrow on the back of the transmitters that shows the correct orientation. (Mic up)
The fact you can pull real-world use examples of most/all of these from your already published videos is a fantastic bit of effort and proof that you guys really take testing gear seriously
The Hollyland M2 is 125 on Amazon in the US right now.
You missed off the one decent mars hollyland system, (stay tuned to a new product soon), what I'd like to know Chris is the post process on the dji mic 2,s you use please.
Wasn't featured directly in this video, but I had a similar issue with wireless interference on my RODE Wireless GO IIs a couple years back. Shot an interview in a small business and had to move her iPad cash register and wireless card reader because it was causing a hum on the receiver a few feet away. Still liked using them overall.
Is there a way to connect more mics to the DJI kit? Looking for a 4 microphone solution
Jordan, try out the Hollyland Lark Max if you have a chance. Its got internal recording, a lot more features aiming towards more advanced user like yourself. The lark m2 is nice but really targetiing very beginner users and have a lot of limitations and compromises. i only use the lark max myself even i have both
Would have loved to see you include the PicoMic 2 Pro in this round up to see how it compares. It chargers with the receiver and you can attach lav mics. The only weakness is that it doesn't do onboard recording, but it has one market advantage of being the most discreet and hidden mic which is something that isn't as valued for UA-camrs. For creators doing corporate or client based videos, having a DJI mic hanging on the shirt is unacceptable.
I use the Røde Wireless Go II. It's a little older than the Go Pro and didn't come with a charging case. I had to buy one from a third party maker. But the sound quality is very good, I can adjust the levels, and the deadcat goes on much easier than with the original Wireless Go. I see no reason to upgrade to the Pro model
Ironic that your voice clips at 0:06 on the word DUAL (and elsewhere throughout the review) on a video about sound quality 😛Thanks for comparing so many models but it looked biaised toward Shure. I am used to more in-depth reviews from you guys. Many important features were not specified. The Lark M2 has impressive environmental noise reduction and is available is different packages. The 32bit float recording on the Wireless Pro is game changer and the kit comes with 2 nice lavalier microphones. And yes, the Saramonic sounds like poop. The Shure has no internal recording, is expensive for the specs and doenst stand out in sound quality.
U think the lark m2 is best? I been looking at getting one
Hollyland Lark M2: there's a, arrow signaling the actual mic. No need to remove the windshield. Hollyland actually covered that.
Does the DJI Mic have the low pass filter on?
There's an arrow on the back of the Lark M2 showing you where the mic is. You can see it when you have the dead cat on.
Listening to this wearing earphones and theres very noticeable noise flaw on the Shure and Hollyland. 🧐
If deciding on a first wireless lav, the DJI Mic2 if happen to already have the Pocket3 or the Action4. The pocket3 is a nice improvement in the pocket line.
On the Hollyland transmitter there is a symbol that shows were the mic capsule is at the back :) so, when using the wind shield, you can tell were it is
Great video, in your opinion would the DJI or Shure be capable as Lavalier for a wedding ceremony and play the signal to a blue tooth speaker? Would you trust them? Are those two 2.4 ghz signal or better?
Thanks,
Greg
The Sennehiser system does have rechargeable lithium batteries by default though maybe the transmitters don't have these by default. This is based on Sennheisers page for their EW-DP EK.
Also on the Shure system there was noticeable additional noise from it.
Honestly DJI always nails those user friendly industrial designs, ui designs and wireless signal. This makes them really unbeatable in multiple different markets.
You are shooting with a Lumix S5IIX, do you hear a tjirp sound when connecting a mic cable on your camera and record?
always luv'd ya guys from back in the day, although I have not seen any of your content in a long while I do notice that like with a fine wine comes a bit of loss of that freshness (some of your video is a little out of focus ;) especially at the start I suppose either you forgot and used the manual option or the focus auto was not set to follow your eyes instead your sweater remains in best focus, not upset with you it's okay... from one trained eye to another lol
Can you use the Dji or Shure for phone calls as well.
Hmm the shure seems to divide opinions, I’ve seen it at the bottom of some of these lists
Hi Guys!
Can i connect the dji to my pc and use like a wireless microphone ?
Thx for helping!
On the very budget end, you should have add the Ulanzi U-Mic AM18 for 80-100 USD. It even has Internal recording.
It's amazing, especially considering the price.
caution on the dji mic - its audio drift is quite apparent on some units
I bought the Shure set recently and love the sound. I think Curtis Judd is the only one to mention the internal compressor, but that can make a huge difference for quick turn around. At the same time it is a fussy product. The firmware update process is fussy, time consuming, very old school, and designed around large production environments where you need to push firmware updates out on a network (not beginner friendly). The mics themselves are small and internal recording isn’t an issue because I have other equipment for that when needed. But transmitter clips are very small and do not have a magnet option, so if you need to clip this to a hoody or jacket collar, it may not stay put all that well. On the other hand, if you’re doing a bunch of corporate interviews (with people wearing dressier clothes), as long as you clip with the battery inside the shirt or blouse then these are quick to put on and off as well as being very inconspicuous. Bottom line, for certain kinds of direct-to-camera quick turn around commercial work, the Shure set will be a huge improvement over dealing with traditional lav systems. Or if you want to record direct to your phone (please Shure, make your mics compatible with the Blackmagic iPhone app!) with higher fidelity, it’s a great system. Those who need the Shure setup will know it. Would I recommend them to a beginner? Probably not.
so funny how extremely the opinion differs.
Fstopppers says the Saramonic sounds best, the Shure the Worst.
PetaPixels says Saramonic sounds worst, the Shure the Best.
Well I doubted Fstoppers already before, something felt off.
The only thing that confuses me is the pretty loud hiss throughout this whole video. I've used a bunch of these Mics and the hiss in normal use without any post processing wasn't nearly as bad, hmmm.
Personally I've switched from the Rode Wireless Go (1st gen) to the Fulaim X5, paid a little over 100€. It has internal recording, 2 transmitters, a good enough case, usb-c and lightning dongle, a very good internal mic, jack for an external mic etc. There's really no need to pay more if you're an amateur. And even the more expensive solutions don't really work better in most normal situtations
Fulaim charger literally burned one of the mics, the plastic is melt and the mic can't be charged anymore, trash binned.
@@ÁzsiábaSzakadtamno product is perfect, if you look long enough you'll find something like that for EVERY product on earth lol
I’m in a bit over my head have both Rode and DJi! The Rode is not Pro, but the cheaper ME, needs an app to make adjustments, but that’s okay. However I struggled attaching the receiver when using the gimbal. SO I bought the DJi Mic 2 just the transmitter! Great for a one man operation simple setup!
Hello DP, my gripe with Rode system is that it totally unusable over distance conversations. You have to stay within natural hearing distance if you want a two way conversation. My Rode Me is truly a Me and not a We. Thank you for your review, Frans
The DJI is impressive. One thing I notice though is that it only comes with 2 windsocks whereas the Rode comes with 3. What happens if you lose one? I did a search to see if you could get just the windsock but couldn't find one.
Great video! The Shure really sound amazing!! The denoiser feature eats up the background noise
I would like to know which system have a replaceable battery? I don’t want a paper weight in a few years. Even if I need to disassemble and do some light soldering.
You might want to check out the ULANZI AM18. It seems quite similar to the saramonic but its a bit cheaper and it has a mini jack input if you want to use a lavalier.
The one system I'm really missing here is Hollyland Lark Max. It has by far the best sound straight out of transmitters.
I agree, I like the Shure's audio!
BUT the windmuff is absolutely useless, especially knowing the price.
Great comparison video.
Thank you so much for your great videos. A question.... What do you do if you want to interview one person with LAV and transmit the signal to two cameras? Meaning One transmitter to Two Receivers. Thank you again.
I've been happy so far with the audio quality from the Hollyland, but my big complaint is that the receiver doesn't really fit the hotshoe of my Fuji X-T4. It kinda jams in there, but I can't really push it in all the way securely. I've thought about filing it down a bit to fit, but it seems like I shouldn't have to do that. Anyone else have this trouble?
DJI seams like a better choice. But for run and gun situation, especially as the summer is coming, this mics are heavy and Shure is to expensive, Lark M2 it might be a better deal, since they are very light and they sound good. What do you think?
Im setting up a live stream for my church and need to capture the pastor as well as the music and ambience from the congregation. I am getting a yahama mixer and going to be using a canon r6 M2. What is the best way you think to get the best sound?
At least in this video, the Røde sounded the best to my likings. Could also be settings etc, but there is something about that Røde sound that sounds more appealing to me
Is hollyland reliable? Or should i go with rode wireless me
The Hollyland Lark transmitters have tiny arrows on the back pointing to the mic opening. A Dan of paint in the arrow makes it very easy to see. I bought it and the AnkerWork M650 because they are small, round and can be put in the chin of a motorcycle helmet. The square or rectangle shaped ones are a nightmare to try to put in a helmet so they will never be an option for me. The Hollyland Lark system works best in a helmet.
What about the Godox options? Any opinions from anyone?
It’s just Wireless Pro. Rode dropped the “Go” part. Probably so as not to confuse with GoPro cameras.
Awesome video very informative! Looking to wear these when im bowling for my channel.
This is a real nice, concise, breakdown. Would it be possible to explore some UHF options as well? I know they're much more expensive and aren't for the masses, but your in the field and professional experiences would be great to hear if you have any!
💯 agreed with you, uhf must be included in the list or at least suggestion, feedback and recommendations about uhf system must be shared
Have been curious about the Hollyland because they are just so small and you just don't always notice them. I get it if you need a lavalier but then if you are going that route there are so many other options available including a bunch not listed here. Feel like in this market it really shouldn't be about the lavalier availability.
I know that this might be subjective but I thought that the Shure mic didn't sound that good. I have watched several reviews on the wireless mics and every time I think that the Rode sounds much better than the others for vocals. That is why I bought them and am happy with them.
You didnt cover it but I like the Nady system. You can plug two mikes into one camera. It is good to trans and receive up to a hundred feet.
It’s clear that the optimal choice for me is to keep my older Saramonic Blinks, which actually do have a 3.5mm jack on each transmitter, as well as input volume control, and thus produce very nice sound. Why they removed those two features on the B2s is an enigma 😑
I almost ordered the dji mic 2 but I found out it doesn’t connect with gopro 12 via bluetooth… some issues there
The shure kit looks way too expensive for a plastic body with no 3.5mm input and no 32 bit recording. I'd expect more features for that outlay.
It's the DJI or the Rode for my money.
How come the Hollyland Lark Max is not included? I like it a lot
Can the shure record internally? Support timecode?
No and no
Do you have a preferred lav for the dji system?
Good run through these options, but have you guys even tried the DJi Mic 2 Bluetooth option? I made a video about this when it came out, hoping the bluetooth feature could cut down on gear to bring, but The audio quality is *really* bad on iPhone connecting directly with bluetooth.
To make matters worse the DJI Mic 2’s internal recording feature is disabled when connecting to smartphones via bluetooth - so it’s not really a valid selling point at all :/
Do you have any suggestions for car audio? Would any of these be a strong fit for an engine bay mount and rear/exhaust of the car?
Shame you didn’t try the Hollyland Lark Max which is very similar to the DJI.
Strange, I watched the comparison of these same microphones on Fstoppers, and their Shure mic turned out to be the worst, of the bunch. I think you guys should check out that video as well before making a purchase decision