6. Confirmatory Tetrad Analysis in SmartPLS-4 || Dr. Dhaval Maheta

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 8

  • @LasanthaWickremesooriya
    @LasanthaWickremesooriya Рік тому

    Excellent presentation. So clear the way you explained. Thank you so much!

  • @tugbakirer
    @tugbakirer Рік тому

    Dear Sir, thanks for your video. how we decide to check p values or CI low CI up? sometimes p values are nor comply 80% rule but CI low CI up includes zero. because of that which one should I check?

  • @SOP-nu4iu
    @SOP-nu4iu Рік тому +1

    Dear Professor, can you please give us a reference for the 80% rule? I could not find any relevant sources within the current literature. Best regards.

    • @micahangela1645
      @micahangela1645 5 місяців тому

      Hello, SOP! I was wondering if you have found the reference for this? Thank you!

  • @DimitrieStoica-p1v
    @DimitrieStoica-p1v Рік тому

    Dear professor,
    I ran a CTA Analysis and found that 4 of 9 cases have p-value less than 0.05 meaning 44% of all combinations and lead to a formative model. Is this enough to say that the model has to be formative? I'm asking you because If I am looking at the CI low adj and CI up adj most of the correlations are -+ meaning that the model has to be reflective. Thank you very much!

  • @anitalow3628
    @anitalow3628 2 роки тому

    sir, what is your purpose to change organization commitment and staying intention from reflective to formative before running CTA? (5 minutes onward)

    • @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash
      @DhavalSaifaleeAaryash  2 роки тому +1

      To run CTA, atleast one construct should be formative. It's a requirement of software

    • @anitalow3628
      @anitalow3628 2 роки тому +1

      @@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash therefore, we have to purposely set any of the construct (with at least 4 indicators associated with it) into formatively-measured before running CTA?