7. Structural Model Assessment in SmartPLS-4 || Dr. Dhaval Maheta
Вставка
- Опубліковано 2 жов 2024
- #sem, #smartpls, #construct, #latent, #innermodel, #path, #R2, #multicollinearity, #blindfolding, #structural
Email: dhavalmaheta1977@gmail.com
Twitter: / dhavalmaheta77
LinkedIn: / dhaval-maheta-320200153
Facebook ID: / dhaval.maheta.37
Telegram ID: t.me/DhavalMaheta
F- square value of one independent variable on dependent shows 0. It that correct . If correct that what could be the interpretation sir. Hoping for your reply 😊
sir, i ran the collinearity stats VIF and 17 indicators of one variable is having value of more than 5 in the collinearity of outer model but the discriminant validity and the cross loadings was okay and the values of inner model collinearity is less than 5. Pls help what can i do to fix this? New to PLS SEM PLS HELP
No need to worry. Your discriminant validity is ok
@@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash is my collinearity condition okay? can i move on to next step criteria of PLS SEM? Thank you very much sir for replying. I am currently running a pilot test on my thesis model and following your tutorial for it. They are of great help🙏
Dear Prof
Thank you for your resourceful video.
I have a question concerning f-square. In your video, the bootstrapping is chosen with the one-tailed test type.
In my situation, I have a mediator construct with a small effect size on DV.
When I chose to bootstrap with one-tailed, I got a p-value of 0.034; meanwhile, when I chose to bootstrap with two-tailed, I got a p-value of 0.069 (above 0.005).
Should I report the finding for the test with two-tailed or revert back with the one-tailed test of bootstrapping?
Thank you
in case our criterion construct (endogenous)is formatively measured according to theory and past literature, is it meaningless to conduct blindfoling to get Q-squared?
Dear Prof. Dhaval Maheta, I watched your SmartPLS-4 training videos on UA-cam. You helped me a lot with my doctoral research. I have a question for you. I am studying a serial mediation model in my thesis. In the structural model, my model goodness of fit values were calculated as SRMR value 0.056, χ2 value 799.167, NFI value 0.836. Additionally, the d_ULS value was calculated as 0.718 and the d_G value was calculated as 0.342. My reliability and validity criteria were met and my hypotheses were significant. Since the NFI value is below 0.90, it does not seem acceptable. Is there anything you can suggest me on this matter? I appreciate any feedback you may have. Please respond at your earliest convenience.
@@MineDeğirmencioğlu how much is it
0.836
@@MineDeğirmencioğlu tolerable
@@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash Thank you. Can you recommend a bibliography I can cite for this?
very insightful and explained in detail. thank you sir.
Dhaval sir very helpful video on sem. Thank you so much!
sir, if one construct of interest (for example, loyalty to the organization)is added after staying intention. Then, we have staying intention as the mediator. How do we test the effect size (f-squared) for the mediator?
Just see my entire playlist...you will come to know
@@DhavalSaifaleeAaryash well,....moving on....thanks.
@@anitalow3628 you can join my whatsup channel
chat.whatsapp.com/HoJ7AqIPnoW7cPSTsYekjZ
how can we find q square size effect?
It is now available in pls predict. See my video on it
Thank you so much Dr. Dhaval!