How I Shocked King's Gambit Players in the Opening 👁️👁️
Вставка
- Опубліковано 21 вер 2024
- ▶️ My Complete e5 Defense Course: bit.ly/complet...
👁️ My 2nd Channel: @KaspaChessClips
🛒 GET MY CHESS COURSES HERE: www.kaspachess...
💖 SUBSCRBE FOR MORE VIDEOS: bit.ly/3K3fEYk
✅ JOIN ME ON PATREON: / kaspachess
💰💲 Promote our courses and get 40% commission: bit.ly/42v9Vkf
🤝 JOIN OUR FREE MASTERCLASS: bit.ly/3p7JUK3
COURSE DESCRIPTION:
If you are a beginner or someone rated below 2400 on Lichess or chess.com, I'd suggest that you study this course.
In this course, you will learn every important line that you need to know about the King's pawn opening, precisely, 1. e4 e5.
The featured opening responses are:
Paris Defense (e5-d6), Ruy Lopez, Scotch Game/Gambit, Nc3 Vienna, Bishop's Opening, and the Four Knights game, plus many more openings to be included...
Please hit the 'Like' 👍 button and subscribe ❤ for more wonderful videos.
#gambits #openings #traps #chess #ruylopez
![My Secret Opening For Black To Win In 6 Moves [King's Gambit Counter]](/img/n.gif)
My Complete e5 Defense Course: bit.ly/complete-e5-defense-buy-now
I've been playing through classical King's Gambit games, and playing both side for many years and YOU have carved out new territory in a centuries old opening. Be proud. Again, I can't wait until the next eyeball blasting content! Thanks.
Wow, another display of tactical fireworks by Masta Kaspa, with comedic patter the entire time. A great way to spend a lazy Sunday afternoon.
Thank you for your encouraging words 🙏
Very interesting opening variation of the King gambit with black, thank you Kaspa chess!
Thks Kaspa
That first opponent played an utterly appalling level of chess. How on earth does he have a rating above 2000 and play such dreadful moves?
If you play good chess, you increase your opponent's chances to blunder.
This looks good I had nothing for kings Gambit
Make sure to look at 3.Nc3 too, when d5 4.exd5 transposes to 2...d5 3.exd5 c6 4.Nc3.
Kaspa likes to neglect the best responses.
Thanks
@@marknieuweboer8099that's not always true. If you see a gap in one video, it means I have done a couple of videos on that particular opening topic. E.g. I have many videos on this particular opening response, one of which is linked below:
ua-cam.com/video/-mYH3dgujGk/v-deo.htmlsi=9TsuGUWK7Qwkl4IN
I'm still waiting for 1.Nf3 d5 2.e4 dxe4 3.Ng5 Nf6 4.d3 Bg4!
I have nice progress! >1500 thanks to U :)
I have to focus on how to manage pawns storm on the Q and K sides now.
Keep it up
I thought Naroditsky prefers the Schallop defense. He has a very long and detailed video on it vs. KG.
I guess he has many favorites, and this should be one of them.
@@kaspachessofficial I agree! I took a deep dive into these lines yesterday. The Schallop is a King's Gambit Accepted defense, and it's much more theoretical than this one. This one is more intuitive for someone at my level.
I really do enjoy the majority of your content. In the main it is extremely exciting to watch 👍
I appreciate that! 🙏
Nice one
Thanks 🔥
How can F4xE5 possibly be the top played move in the Lichess database? It’s such a basic error that everyone who plays the king’s gambit surely must know
It’s not in the least bit educational to watch a game where a player simply hangs material like when he left his F3 knight en prix. Utterly bewildering
Sorry Kaspa. Just a note for you. I often hear you saying that a certain player is down a full piece when in fact they are down a whole rook. We don’t say a player is down a piece. Down a piece is when a player is down by either a bishop or a knight. If a player is down a rook then we say a player is down a rook
Rook is a piece
Yes but to differentiate between being a bishop or knight down with a value of 3 points and being a rook down with a value of 5 points then one must specify that one is a rook down and not a piece down. You clearly don’t understand the deeper meaning behind what I am explaining and just make a very shallow remark
@@pangeagamestudios I take the trouble to explain my point very carefully with lots of words and you simply reply with A rook is a piece.
I will work on that next time.