ua-cam.com/video/0bGb643Sry0/v-deo.htmlsi=te4ZVxSP6c-mFXmA This video will begin to help explain his check 100 strat against live recs OOP. Basically, they make way more mistakes vs checks than they do vs bets. He uses lots of node locked sims to gird the strategies in other videos, though not this particular one. I know Charlie fundamentally disagrees with this strat as "lazy", but taken in as an entire strategy of capping our opponents and punishing them for just playing so face up, Marc's stuff is willing itself out in my winrate, which has absolutely shot through the roof since I discovered him through Crush Live Poker back in 2021.
I range liked (👍)this comment from the subject of the video without reading what it said. I don't think it really matters to the algorithm if I read the pinned comments or not. As long as I seem like a bot it's definitely a plus EV like.
I have so much respect for both of you, Gentlemen. Mr. Carrel, thank you. Love your intellectual approach to poker.BTW Marc checks and bets his entire range until he doesn't. I have seen him deviate so you are 100%5 correct. I love the React videos; how about having Marc critique your play?
Marc chooses some slightly larger sizes than I think are necessary. However his logic is sound and he has revolutionised how I think about bluffing. Its working for me and really upped my winrate
He range checks in SRP pots OOP because a lot of low stakes live players overstab flops, telegraph their hand strength with their sizing and do not protect their check back range. I've seen him deviate from it when it makes sense in certain scenarios.
Love the review! As a denizen of the California $5 and $10 blind streets, I can confirm that in that hand where Marc flops trip 3's, the population is delighted to stack off with QQ+ on the flop. It's not so much player specific, as population tendencies. And that is where Marc shines. Love your reviews and analysis.
Long time hungry horse viewer, first time Charlie Carrel viewer. After watching this I’m now a newly minted Charlie Carrel Subscriber and potential Elite University member, thanks for the great analysis!
His stratagy he got straight from nodelocking millions recreational players.He range check becuase his opponent stabs too much andrange bet becuase recreational players raise their top of range making his opponent so caped on the turn..He made over a million dollars in cash games .
that's because you believe him when he says he made a million dollars playing cash games. I don't. He plays like most decent 2/5 regs, and that's not going to make you a million dollars in a few years lol. anyone selling courses or "bootcamps" is like very likely a liar
There is quite a lot of confidence in thinking that you can provide not just an opinion on his play but definitively say how good he is, and assume that every thing you would do differently is better. I want to see you go and play in similar games and do significantly better, and if you can't then how is what you say, "the truth"?. Your play should win more money, or it isn't better. I think you would be a lot less confident about that than you are about how much better you are. How do you explain this gap between confidence you are better and confidence you can win more, over a large sample.
Charlie, during hands I have been focusing on consistently staring at a spot on the table, controlling breathing, blink rate, heart rate ect.... to limit my tells, however, I'm not watching my opponent or looking them in the eyes in doing so. What are your thoughts? Should I always be looking at my opponent? Thank you
@@JohnnyAppleseed-yl6fo yep, lemme just pull a book out and examine every one of my opponents tells. Also your comment doesn’t even relate to what OP asked, which is in regards to limiting his own tells
IDK why but I have never really liked your content. I think it felt a bit gimmicky. This felt really genuine and showed off your high level knowledge. Really enjoyed it. Nice stuff. Way to impress a hater, respectfully.
Hungary horse has a school and the whole nine same as you Charlie. So as a colab why don't you both do this same analysis as this but back to back. to highlight different styles and thought processes.
😂😂😂 What happened during the live streams? He had access to one of the easiest high stakes games in the world at HCL and was not able to be a winner there
@@ptantonioalvesI’d be interested to know the backstory on this as well. He seemed to do reasonably well on the streams that I watched. But for a guy to drop all the way down to 5-5 just for a “challenge” seems odd. He clearly has a significant bankroll. Maybe there is some other reason he isn’t getting in the stream games. Or maybe he really is choosing to pursue coaching on a more full time basis.
@@nicholi2789 pursuing coaching i think. Perhaps trying to build a bigger audience to get onto juicy games. But coaching is the easiest passive income poker players have access to. His coaching has always been targeted to mid/low stakes, and hes just displaying it works, driving traffic to his coaching.
What Charlie doesn't seem to understand is that in the videos of Marc playing, he's at low stakes games and he's trying to exploit the weaknesses in the amateur games. He does NOT play that way in much higher stake games. He's altering his play for low stakes. So YES, Marc is really good at poker. To be successful in poker you must alter your game play depending on who you're playing against.
Hungry Horse seems like a solid player in that pool he knows how to play streets and has a decent understanding on how to exploit GTO nits as well as recreationals , like anyone playing live your gonna make a bunch of mistakes on long sessions etc which his footage has probably helped him improve quickly when he reviews and sees his play , I actually like his thought process in alot of spots but he does make a few mistakes when it comes to 3 betting ranges pre flop etc , people do underestimate how good of a live player Charlie actually is and his understanding of the game is actually second to none , I know we all have a bit of Banter but Charlie breaks down stuff so much easier then these little GTO nerds who have ruined the game and content , checking his entire range OOP is obviously his biggest leak but he's obviously in some soft games for this to still be profitable 😂😂😂😂 because I'm at least 99.9% sure that this wouldn't work in any 500nl game on earth 😂😂😂
If you are against a mostly folder, always say that you had what you think that they think that you had .. if they call to much, reinforce calling, if they fold too much, reinforce folding.
Decided to take the offer for elite university! Charlie's style is my favorite & Marc is a beast. I also disagree with his OOP 100% range checking, but I'm also a losing cash player. Winning tournament player but really want to get better at cash games! Looking forward to working with the Elite squad!
@@johannesgroe-scharmann2104What does the fact that tournaments are more complex have to do with anything? Mtt players are MUCH worse on average so you don't have to be that good to be a winner.
Play your hand against their range. ___ Key Exploitive Questions 1. What is my hand? 2. What is their range? 3. What is my perceived range? 4. What am I going to do about it?
Charlie I just wanted to say thank you for the great content, I can't play or gamble any more, but you are so inspiring in your approach short and long term and fun attitude and true wisdom.
5:24 i put this into a pot odds calculator (im not going to claim to be good at poker since I needed to use one lol) but basically from the opponent’s pov they need to be right 39% of the time to call. which in turn doesnt that mean Marc only needs to get folds 61% of the time for this to work? Maybe this is just semantics. but to me you made it sound like this bluff needs to work like 80-90% of the time. And I do just think you’re getting folds at least 40% of the time here. Basically Jacks and below are folding like 95%+ of the time. And he bet small on flop and river so theres still a decent amount of junk in villains range. And then I think importantly all the hands better than jacks but worse than a flush are still folding _some_ amount. 60% fold seems like a given to me but im just a guy
You’re right the opponent only has to be right 39% of time but that doesn’t mean Marc needs to get it through 61% of the time That logic is wrong as according to that if Marc bet really small so that the opponent Only needed to be right 10% Marc would need that bet to work 90% of the time which obviously isn’t the case. The right maths here is Marc is risking $375 to win $200 + $375 back so it needs to get through 375/(375 + 200) which is 65%.
Cracking vid. watch all Hungry Horse video's as well as since I found him about 2 months ago. Been a longer fan of yours CC and I am OMC myself who's been stuck at the micros forever so joined your freeroll as well. 1 time !!!
If you want to understand why HH plays the way he does, you need to watch all or most of his videos. He has the theory videos and then videos like this show it in action. I went thru his entire channel recently. I can't say how good his strategy is, but it makes sense. I think it may work in deep stack games with bad players but will be more challenging in games with lower buy-in caps.
yes good video - I've been watching Marc's videos the past couple months - getting hands to call turn in order to bluff river is new to me, but I've been implementing it some as well. Also good to see a critique of Marc's style and approach.
What is cool is Charlie is critiquing live decisions from HH, who presumably could critique his own live decision making in the same way. The better the player the closer their thinking is between live play and off table theory, and my live play drags far behind the level I'm at in study, so... need to work on bringing that to the felt.
First, love the video well done. My two queries are... Second bomb pot with flush draw and set, I dont see the merit in betting on that flop, even on the turn. Reason, the amount of hearts that are already out on both boards and the extra heart in hand makes it highly unlikely it will come in and if it happens to come in pairing the board your in no mans land. And bottom board being trip 6s, trips are only good if you boat up. Get there cheaply. And the other minor analysis is the 3,4 hand, i thought that was the right play for a low stakes table. Great review Charlie, for the last 2 months ive been checking my entire range out of position. Guessing i have become exploitable.
No one at 2/5 4bets anything but AA, KK, AK sometimes. Or at least not at a high enough frequency to matter. Also, Recs play poorly out of position in 3 bet pots so you bloat a pot with positional advantage against a rec. you could almost do it with any two cards from the button
Hey Charlie. Tell us more about how PLO Double Board Bomb Pots are a Test of Intelligence and Are an Intuitive game? I am quite curious about your opinion here. I reckon there is some study that can go into Split Pot Theory? Also understanding value thresholds if you don't play PLO on the regular?
Good NLHE player, typical NL blaster in PLO. Which can work alot in normal PLO, but DBPLO is a license to spew money. Over vallued both top and bottom board especially in bombpots for obvs reasons.
There is a simple rule: people who don't play online in global pool - can't be good at poker. They might win good money in their local games or whatever.. but theory wise they won't be able to compete
Range checking oop does just feel wrong but he does have videos going into great detail explaining why he does it so idk. Also, don't know if you did one already on this content creator but what do you think of AeroInnovations?
41:13 that 775 raise makes ZERO sense. Hes only doing that with ace high flush. Even then, he wants straights and smaller flushes to call. By betting so big, he almost doesnt want a call. Also, he did NOT raise preflop. Highly unlikely he has ace high flush
that's interesting that you say "I have 8s" is an indication of not having 8s, from what I've seen people say their exact hand a lot more often than any other random possible hand
I agree. Most people will sometimes tell the truth because they think it give more credence to their lies. Even though no one is keeping track of all their exclamations simple because they don't play together enough to get the full picture if they did (So why bother? I don't know, but they do.). But because they sometimes tell the truth they're accidently increasing the likelihood they have exactly that hand than it would actually occur randomly. With an eight already on board when the claim was made, only three combos remain out of all the possible hands he could have. If it was 30:1 before the claim, it might be 5:1 or lower afterwards (or if their claim makes a set, they could have another set). Although in the video, the player was misunderstood as he was initially stating his stack size, not hand. But Goone's claim of having pocket tens is a great example of it, brilliantly hidden by the timing of stating it immediately after a ten hit the turn given the dialog previously. I've watched a lot of Marc's videos, and he announces his actual cards way more often than they would occur (I want to say at least 1/3 the time), at least in the hands he puts in the videos.
With respect to Charlie's claim, if the player had made the claim before the flop when his range is very wide, it's much more likely to be a lie. I think the insight that the player also wouldn't have another pair in the vicinity is good, as the player wouldn't want to define his range. After the flop such a claim is far more likely to be the truth than occurs randomly.
yeah, because they always reraise a flush, right? Nobody ever hits check/call on a flush....oh wait; yes they do. His style is exploited by getting it; then just hitting call.
thanks for the review charlie! many really good critiques. would love to come on and talk about range checking OOP :D
Well said! You are definitely someone to admire.
Dude you suck at poker, the only place where you can beat the 5/5 is at the hustler vs brain dead rich degenerates
ua-cam.com/video/0bGb643Sry0/v-deo.htmlsi=te4ZVxSP6c-mFXmA
This video will begin to help explain his check 100 strat against live recs OOP.
Basically, they make way more mistakes vs checks than they do vs bets. He uses lots of node locked sims to gird the strategies in other videos, though not this particular one.
I know Charlie fundamentally disagrees with this strat as "lazy", but taken in as an entire strategy of capping our opponents and punishing them for just playing so face up, Marc's stuff is willing itself out in my winrate, which has absolutely shot through the roof since I discovered him through Crush Live Poker back in 2021.
I range liked (👍)this comment from the subject of the video without reading what it said. I don't think it really matters to the algorithm if I read the pinned comments or not. As long as I seem like a bot it's definitely a plus EV like.
Please do have a pod together we would all love this
I have so much respect for both of you, Gentlemen. Mr. Carrel, thank you. Love your intellectual approach to poker.BTW Marc checks and bets his entire range until he doesn't. I have seen him deviate so you are 100%5 correct. I love the React videos; how about having Marc critique your play?
Marc chooses some slightly larger sizes than I think are necessary.
However his logic is sound and he has revolutionised how I think about bluffing.
Its working for me and really upped my winrate
He range checks in SRP pots OOP because a lot of low stakes live players overstab flops, telegraph their hand strength with their sizing and do not protect their check back range. I've seen him deviate from it when it makes sense in certain scenarios.
100% agree
Based on tendency
MOM AND DAD PLEASE STOP FIGHTING
mom and dad went to a show ,dropped me off at grandpa joes ,kicked and screamed said please nooo . grandma take me home...nirvana
The AA and QJ hand , your critics of his play are absolutely on point 🎉🎉 Hey but make no mistakes he’s a good player
critiques
Would love to see a collab between Hungry Horse and Charlie. They both think similarly and play creative exploitive poker !!
A wild idea, they play a game heads up, but they have to bet each other's hand's without seeing them.
Love the review! As a denizen of the California $5 and $10 blind streets, I can confirm that in that hand where Marc flops trip 3's, the population is delighted to stack off with QQ+ on the flop. It's not so much player specific, as population tendencies. And that is where Marc shines.
Love your reviews and analysis.
If there’s a flush draw they will stack off 100%
Long time hungry horse viewer, first time Charlie Carrel viewer. After watching this I’m now a newly minted Charlie Carrel Subscriber and potential Elite University member, thanks for the great analysis!
I'd love to see you critique Pete Clarke at Carrot Corner. I think you guys would agree on a lot.
Pete Clarke is sharp man way sharper then my learning ability lol
Pete is the top of the top for any player puuuuhhhhllll
His stratagy he got straight from nodelocking millions recreational players.He range check becuase his opponent stabs too much andrange bet becuase recreational players raise their top of range making his opponent so caped on the turn..He made over a million dollars in cash games .
Charlie commends Marc for having humility, but doesn't have much of his in considering Marc's OOP SRP xrange..
i mean charlie is much worse then the dude he is watching, just pointless video
that's because you believe him when he says he made a million dollars playing cash games. I don't. He plays like most decent 2/5 regs, and that's not going to make you a million dollars in a few years lol. anyone selling courses or "bootcamps" is like very likely a liar
@@phrog6073 lmao i guess you don't know who charlie is. joke comment
@@barbrothers2 hes was a live mtt reg in the old days, means nothing about cash game play nowdays
There is quite a lot of confidence in thinking that you can provide not just an opinion on his play but definitively say how good he is, and assume that every thing you would do differently is better.
I want to see you go and play in similar games and do significantly better, and if you can't then how is what you say, "the truth"?. Your play should win more money, or it isn't better. I think you would be a lot less confident about that than you are about how much better you are. How do you explain this gap between confidence you are better and confidence you can win more, over a large sample.
Looking forward to you both collaborating. Loved your analysis of the table talk/hands. Both of your styles are extremely creative and fun to watch
I would love to see a collab between you two “Exploitative Live Poker Gurus”
He explained his node locking strategy in multiple videos using pio solver. His logic seemed pretty sound to me
Charlie, during hands I have been focusing on consistently staring at a spot on the table, controlling breathing, blink rate, heart rate ect.... to limit my tells, however, I'm not watching my opponent or looking them in the eyes in doing so. What are your thoughts? Should I always be looking at my opponent? Thank you
You should study tells and study your opponents tells.
@@JohnnyAppleseed-yl6fogreat answer, dude. Really specific. For some better advice how about “you should read your opponent lol”
@@johns5071 Tell me you didn't bother to read the entire comment without telling me...
@@JohnnyAppleseed-yl6fo yep, lemme just pull a book out and examine every one of my opponents tells. Also your comment doesn’t even relate to what OP asked, which is in regards to limiting his own tells
Smtms just wink to yr opp. It devastates ppl and will release yr pressure. Try it.
IDK why but I have never really liked your content. I think it felt a bit gimmicky. This felt really genuine and showed off your high level knowledge. Really enjoyed it. Nice stuff. Way to impress a hater, respectfully.
Genuinely also was a hater until I saw the other video he’s done in this style and now I’m converted icl.
Would love to see a collab of some kind. Even just a conversation about poker and stuff
The response from marc should be hilarious cause marc shows up with receipts
Wow I have been binging his series recently and its so cool that you are making a recap of it.
Hungary horse has a school and the whole nine same as you Charlie. So as a colab why don't you both do this same analysis as this but back to back. to highlight different styles and thought processes.
Great suggestion. I'm commenting to add traffic to your comment - hopefully drawing attention to the idea.
Yeah that would actually be pretty cool
Yeah tre way
Its kind of funny seeing Charlie talk about Marc as if he is just some small time Yter trying to "make it" Marc has made millions in high stakes game.
😂😂😂 What happened during the live streams? He had access to one of the easiest high stakes games in the world at HCL and was not able to be a winner there
@@ptantonioalvesdon’t be result oriented, bro.
We don’t know what happens off stream
@@ptantonioalvesI’d be interested to know the backstory on this as well.
He seemed to do reasonably well on the streams that I watched. But for a guy to drop all the way down to 5-5 just for a “challenge” seems odd.
He clearly has a significant bankroll. Maybe there is some other reason he isn’t getting in the stream games.
Or maybe he really is choosing to pursue coaching on a more full time basis.
@@nicholi2789 pursuing coaching i think. Perhaps trying to build a bigger audience to get onto juicy games. But coaching is the easiest passive income poker players have access to. His coaching has always been targeted to mid/low stakes, and hes just displaying it works, driving traffic to his coaching.
@@nicholi2789I don’t think he plays much other than this challenge. Sounds like he’s coaching and learning UA-cam algorithms currently.
Love to see you do one for Mariano just because I find his content the easiest on the eye overall. Good for casuals (similar to Brad Owen).
16:48 would you still bet river after blasting turn?
You two are my favorite poker content creators full stop. You two collaborating is like a dream coming true, looking forward to more content ❤
What Charlie doesn't seem to understand is that in the videos of Marc playing, he's at low stakes games and he's trying to exploit the weaknesses in the amateur games. He does NOT play that way in much higher stake games. He's altering his play for low stakes. So YES, Marc is really good at poker. To be successful in poker you must alter your game play depending on who you're playing against.
Really enjoying these - would like to see a collab between yourself and Hungry Horse too!
Hungry Horse seems like a solid player in that pool he knows how to play streets and has a decent understanding on how to exploit GTO nits as well as recreationals , like anyone playing live your gonna make a bunch of mistakes on long sessions etc which his footage has probably helped him improve quickly when he reviews and sees his play , I actually like his thought process in alot of spots but he does make a few mistakes when it comes to 3 betting ranges pre flop etc , people do underestimate how good of a live player Charlie actually is and his understanding of the game is actually second to none , I know we all have a bit of Banter but Charlie breaks down stuff so much easier then these little GTO nerds who have ruined the game and content , checking his entire range OOP is obviously his biggest leak but he's obviously in some soft games for this to still be profitable 😂😂😂😂 because I'm at least 99.9% sure that this wouldn't work in any 500nl game on earth 😂😂😂
"GTO nits" is a contradiction. GTO is anything but nitty
@eckowezen 🤣🤣 GTO players are the easiest to exploit as they all playing the exact same ranges
His channel is amazing
If you are against a mostly folder, always say that you had what you think that they think that you had .. if they call to much, reinforce calling, if they fold too much, reinforce folding.
BSTI = bet small to induce?
Decided to take the offer for elite university! Charlie's style is my favorite & Marc is a beast. I also disagree with his OOP 100% range checking, but I'm also a losing cash player. Winning tournament player but really want to get better at cash games! Looking forward to working with the Elite squad!
Tournaments are way more complex. How many tourneys have you played to say you are a winning player?
@@johannesgroe-scharmann2104What does the fact that tournaments are more complex have to do with anything? Mtt players are MUCH worse on average so you don't have to be that good to be a winner.
@@pierrearrgood Point!
Play your hand against their range.
___
Key Exploitive Questions
1. What is my hand?
2. What is their range?
3. What is my perceived range?
4. What am I going to do about it?
Charlie I just wanted to say thank you for the great content, I can't play or gamble any more, but you are so inspiring in your approach short and long term and fun attitude and true wisdom.
5:24 i put this into a pot odds calculator (im not going to claim to be good at poker since I needed to use one lol) but basically from the opponent’s pov they need to be right 39% of the time to call. which in turn doesnt that mean Marc only needs to get folds 61% of the time for this to work?
Maybe this is just semantics. but to me you made it sound like this bluff needs to work like 80-90% of the time. And I do just think you’re getting folds at least 40% of the time here. Basically Jacks and below are folding like 95%+ of the time. And he bet small on flop and river so theres still a decent amount of junk in villains range. And then I think importantly all the hands better than jacks but worse than a flush are still folding _some_ amount. 60% fold seems like a given to me but im just a guy
You’re right the opponent only has to be right 39% of time but that doesn’t mean Marc needs to get it through 61% of the time
That logic is wrong as according to that if Marc bet really small so that the opponent Only needed to be right 10% Marc would need that bet to work 90% of the time which obviously isn’t the case.
The right maths here is Marc is risking $375 to win $200 + $375 back so it needs to get through 375/(375 + 200) which is 65%.
Cracking vid. watch all Hungry Horse video's as well as since I found him about 2 months ago. Been a longer fan of yours CC and I am OMC myself who's been stuck at the micros forever so joined your freeroll as well. 1 time !!!
Charlie, can you send me the link on the lifetime MasterClass. I apologize I cannot seem to find it.
If you want to understand why HH plays the way he does, you need to watch all or most of his videos. He has the theory videos and then videos like this show it in action. I went thru his entire channel recently. I can't say how good his strategy is, but it makes sense. I think it may work in deep stack games with bad players but will be more challenging in games with lower buy-in caps.
Please make a podcast with Marc ❤
Do carrot poker
yes good video - I've been watching Marc's videos the past couple months - getting hands to call turn in order to bluff river is new to me, but I've been implementing it some as well. Also good to see a critique of Marc's style and approach.
You should do 5 hour heads-up battle
Doesn’t need real money, but do it for HONOR!
What is cool is Charlie is critiquing live decisions from HH, who presumably could critique his own live decision making in the same way. The better the player the closer their thinking is between live play and off table theory, and my live play drags far behind the level I'm at in study, so... need to work on bringing that to the felt.
So idk poker or really anyone I'm just slowly getting into it but how good is this guy who's saying he good everyone else is (genuine question)
27:35 river spot is close? What? Why? Back door diamonds not even mentioned?
Charlie, any thoughts on Bart Hanson's Crush Live Poker material? Thanks!
First, love the video well done.
My two queries are...
Second bomb pot with flush draw and set,
I dont see the merit in betting on that flop, even on the turn. Reason, the amount of hearts that are already out on both boards and the extra heart in hand makes it highly unlikely it will come in and if it happens to come in pairing the board your in no mans land.
And bottom board being trip 6s, trips are only good if you boat up. Get there cheaply.
And the other minor analysis is the 3,4 hand, i thought that was the right play for a low stakes table.
Great review Charlie, for the last 2 months ive been checking my entire range out of position. Guessing i have become exploitable.
Would love to see Marc play some 200nl+ online
He would crush so hard.
He tried... Did not go well
can you do mariano or is that too high profile
Charlie, would you rate Aero Plays Poker? I'd love to see that!
🎯 Charlie's Course on Tells: has anyone here bought it and if so, what do you think of the course?
No one at 2/5 4bets anything but AA, KK, AK sometimes. Or at least not at a high enough frequency to matter. Also, Recs play poorly out of position in 3 bet pots so you bloat a pot with positional advantage against a rec. you could almost do it with any two cards from the button
Hey Charlie. Tell us more about how PLO Double Board Bomb Pots are a Test of Intelligence and Are an Intuitive game? I am quite curious about your opinion here. I reckon there is some study that can go into Split Pot Theory? Also understanding value thresholds if you don't play PLO on the regular?
Love the video! One caveat when you claim to be a wise man that truly means that you don't know....
Good NLHE player, typical NL blaster in PLO. Which can work alot in normal PLO, but DBPLO is a license to spew money. Over vallued both top and bottom board especially in bombpots for obvs reasons.
2 mins in, and you're already saying gto this when the player in question doesn't self-proclaimed non gto player.
gr8 format can't wait to see who you review next
There is a simple rule: people who don't play online in global pool - can't be good at poker. They might win good money in their local games or whatever.. but theory wise they won't be able to compete
Would you analyse some of his 100/200 hands?
Whatever he is, he isn’t a con man. Which is not something we can say with certainty about you
What are you talking about
Pls elaborate
I love double board bomb pot PLO, never got the opportunity to play it though, because I don't know where to find games.
Hungry Horse is awesome!
that horse guy is weird enough to make Charlie look normal
I would like to see Charlie and Hungry Horse collaborate on some nice videos! ❤
Range checking oop does just feel wrong but he does have videos going into great detail explaining why he does it so idk. Also, don't know if you did one already on this content creator but what do you think of AeroInnovations?
41:13 that 775 raise makes ZERO sense. Hes only doing that with ace high flush. Even then, he wants straights and smaller flushes to call. By betting so big, he almost doesnt want a call. Also, he did NOT raise preflop. Highly unlikely he has ace high flush
Love this style of video!!❤
Love to see your view on kakitee
I watched this video both ways the original and with your observational analysis do more please loved it❤ you gentlemen must do collaboration 🔗
Good stuff. Many asked for this review amd you delivered like a mailman. Thank you.
Not a hater at all, but I would imagine you could afford a better camera and a microphone. Feels like I watch a stream back in 2008.
Bet small to induce baybayyyyy!
Nice review I like his play as well. I enjoy both of your pages and content
This is great! Please more of these type of videos:)
You earn a new sub for this vid. Keep it up
that's interesting that you say "I have 8s" is an indication of not having 8s, from what I've seen people say their exact hand a lot more often than any other random possible hand
I agree. Most people will sometimes tell the truth because they think it give more credence to their lies. Even though no one is keeping track of all their exclamations simple because they don't play together enough to get the full picture if they did (So why bother? I don't know, but they do.). But because they sometimes tell the truth they're accidently increasing the likelihood they have exactly that hand than it would actually occur randomly. With an eight already on board when the claim was made, only three combos remain out of all the possible hands he could have. If it was 30:1 before the claim, it might be 5:1 or lower afterwards (or if their claim makes a set, they could have another set). Although in the video, the player was misunderstood as he was initially stating his stack size, not hand. But Goone's claim of having pocket tens is a great example of it, brilliantly hidden by the timing of stating it immediately after a ten hit the turn given the dialog previously. I've watched a lot of Marc's videos, and he announces his actual cards way more often than they would occur (I want to say at least 1/3 the time), at least in the hands he puts in the videos.
With respect to Charlie's claim, if the player had made the claim before the flop when his range is very wide, it's much more likely to be a lie. I think the insight that the player also wouldn't have another pair in the vicinity is good, as the player wouldn't want to define his range. After the flop such a claim is far more likely to be the truth than occurs randomly.
Hungry horse is great at optimizing against bad 2/5 players in LA.
Holy shit! The colab would be amazing. Why not do something where guys have a Premium UA-cam channel and split it. I’d sub immediately.
This was a great video. Thanks for doing it.
If someone is profitable they're good that's all there is to it 😂
BSTI-Bet small to induce
Cool! Could you review NachosPoker?
Who is this CHARLIE Dude ?? In any case...one thing I must say about HUNGRY HORSE: 15" POKER HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRRDDDDDDDDD
He made some adjustments early in this series for the small stakes players. Just sayin'.
collaboration idea? join a tag team tournament!
Do Pete Clarke Carrot Corner
A five is never folding at the games I play😂😂
My 2 favourite players. Nice one Charlie.
playin 5 2 and folding the str8 on the river... 39:54
yeah, because they always reraise a flush, right? Nobody ever hits check/call on a flush....oh wait; yes they do. His style is exploited by getting it; then just hitting call.
His style is easily exploitable until he notices what you’re doing. The exploit is notice what fish do in a certain situation and don’t do that.
Can you please analyse FrankieC?
LOL.....up and coming youtuber!! he is HS crusher, he is doing a challenge trying to win 100$/hr at low stakes
collab would be you getting coached
Uh huh
Get off his meat bro. Charlie has been at the top for years. Both have different styles, but Charlie has more experience and knowledge imo.
would love to see Mariano
Lexo next. Another decent player or so he says
Do some hand reviews of 25 nl students together.
that man changed the story about 8's so many times makes you wonder did he in the moment forgot what card he has🤣
On the table talk, players rarely lie. They say a soft truth. If he says 88 the he has something like 88 without being 88
The only problem I have with this is that he is playing in 2-5 uncapped games which makes the whole thing essentially BS.
please take a look at 4 bet blind
Dunno if he's any good, but boi, is he pretty. He'd probably wanna be extra vigilant as to not end up in jail for whatever reason.