Five die crossing the Channel hours after Rwanda bill passes
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 тра 2024
- It's supposed to stop people risking their lives crossing the channel to Britain.
(Subscribe: bit.ly/C4_News_Subscribe)
But the threat of being put on a flight to Rwanda didn't stop several more boats attempting the perilous journey across the maritime equivalent of the M25.
Rishi Sunak says the government is acting out of compassion, to stop more tragedies like the one today, but campaigners say deportation to Rwanda is cruel and probably won't work.
-----------------------
Follow us:
Facebook - / channel4news
Twitter - / channel4news
TikTok - / c4news
Instagram - / channel4news
France is a safe country
They are coming from the Eu , why don’t they stay there , Channel 4 has been telling us for years how wonderful the Eu is .
.... its safe unless you are a French Catholic minding your oen business in church....
Yes,I'm coming to françe soon then after that I will go to UK, then uk gov will send me to Rwanda, just relax eating benefits 😂
@@user-dq6nj1zv9hBecause people claiming asylum can claim it in any country they want that has signed the UN convention. Even if they enter a country by illegal means. That's why the Rwanda bill is breaking the UN convention we signed up to.
@@Lubnara764 stay where you are. Think of your vibrant culture and heritage back home, think of your parents and ancestors, dont betray them stay where you are living the simple life.
The Lords made sure it went past midnight so they could claim another £300
OLD BA..RDS .
Pretty sure the toilets are rife with the kind of things that keep you awake and cost about £100.
That’s £200 saved for a hooker and kebab on the way home 🤣🤣🤣
@@johnsmith-rs2vk???
£300, how much would that get them in Mayfair with a callgirl??
200 people out of the 30.000 that arrive in a year won't deter people willing to risk their lives one bit
Yeah, but Brexit means Brexit.
We control our borders now.
It's obviously impossible now. /s
Err yes it will mocker
Our navy should have stopped all this a long time ago. Our government has no guts.
The boats coming would be negligible if the tories hadn't closed most safe and legal routes and cut the border staff.
@@royboy565is France unsafe? Asylum claim is they are fearful for their lives..... France is extremely safe compared to where they came from so then risking their lives AGAIN to pick and choose like it's a vacation home.... Explain. Come on! Explain how they can still be fearful of France, risk their lives, which undercuts that they don't have a valid asylum claim anymore.
@@djm2189maybe their second language is English?
How many languages do you speak? And which ones?
@@gb8628 and? How does that have ANYTHING to do with an asylum claim? Smart one.... They are here due to fear for their lives. Once in France they are safe. Thus their only reason they are here is accomplished. To pick and choose is no longer their right, it's illegal immigration now. Imagine a starving person turning down rice because they wanted a steak🙂↔️🙂↔️😂😂 man y'all don't know shiii about asylum.
What about OUR mental health seeing this invasion everyday!!!
Thought you'd gone away Suella.
Simply don`t give them one Penny , they come to the UK because they get more money here than in France , No money and they will not come , People like Zoe Gardner ignore the FACTS that they are required to register in the first safe port , That is France , Spain , Greece , Portugal .
They dont have to apply for asylum in the first country they land at. They can go to any country they want that has signed up to the UN convention. If we were still in the E U then applying in the first country you landed at would apply under the Dublin convention. All the asylum seekers have to tell the authorities in France etc is that they want asylum in the UK.
@@royboy565 hmm if that’s the case then when interviewed are they saying that have been unsuccessful in claiming asylum in countries that have travelled through and are saying that Britain is their last chance?
Furthermore what type of person are we importing when they are fighting with each other for places on the dinghies? Where is the compassion for a 7 year old child?
@@royboy565 all the Eu countries ignore the Dublin rule . Nice try .
Did you hear we voted for Brexit?
Don’t cross the channel in the first place 😒
You don't understand the places these people come from
@@yayfly7349
I do
I’ve been to France
@@yayfly7349They have come from the safety of France.
@@yayfly7349 so u don’t understand where I come from.
@@yayfly7349 FRANCE . A SAFE COUNTRY. AND HOW MANY SAFE COUNTRIES HAVE THEY PASSED THROUGH ?
Oh she wants a transport system for them to come over when they shouldn’t be coming over what a spanner.
Channel 4, any news on the TR court case verdict ????
Thrown out of court, doesn't suit the narrative
Thrown out due to wrong date being written
@@chrismurphy6070 - more to it than that .. inspector falsifying paperwork, unlawful arrest, unlawful use of pepper spray, officers blatantly lying about their body cam footage .. perfect example of the 2 tier policing in the UK
Fantastic question.
It’s a pity there are no journalists at C4 who are capable of answering a complex question like that, something to do with mental capacity…. And being on the woke take….
You would think they would be diving all over the abuse of power thing within The Police Force and above…
Even Israeli MPs can’t get a word in when being invited for interviews.
Tommy’s court case….. bird chirping…..
No it won’t, because anyone currently coming to the UK by boat can’t be deported to Rwanda. Therefore it’s not a deterrent, just a very expensive exchange of asylum seekers between the UK and Rwanda... if it ever actually happens. It’s mostly just meant to distract people from the lack of any serious policies.
The persistence of Sunak is absolute proof of how stupid he thinks we are
They can be deported if they come illegally. Some actually already even got their notice
These people risk their lives to get here, in little rubber boats. The threat that they just might get deported to Rwanda will never be a deterrent. It costs far too much to deport someone that way, so it can only ever be a tiny, tiny fraction. Pretty good odds for anyone brave enough to try it. It won't work, and the tories are under no illusion that it will. It's just another pathetic attempt to get more votes.
@@defaultpanic We are stupid. We are turkey voting for Christmas. The next GE should be a landslide victory for those with half a brain in an ideal world, but we wont have that...
It’s a genuine attempt to deter the Illegal immigrants from coming from France . None of them are fleeing any persecution , war , torture.
Sending 4 or 5 migrants to Rwanda won't deter these people.
The UK has a duty to look after them while the British homeless get left on the scrapheap.
There is nothing to stop us passing a law which gives our homeless the same rights!
The tories are the absolute worst
lol
Think they’re bad, what will labour do, give illegal immigrants caviar on the beach probably like the communists they are
Did their French navy escort not see they were in trouble ?
Non. Zey ver looking ze uzzer way.
All of those waiting to cross the channel have travelled through other SAFE European countries .. wonder why they want to get to the UK 🤔
The comparatively few people who want to claim asylum in the UK often have family already in the UK, or else they're English-speaking, or many are Afghans who the UK has a moral debt to
After WW2, It was agreed that the first safe country, isn't the solution. Otherwise if a conflict broke out in a region, the nearby safe country would be swamped. So it's part of international law, asylum seekers choose their sanctuary. Not many choose Britain, we have very little immigration compared with other countries. It's been made a culture war, by the tories and their client media.
To sell drugs from fake barber shops, of course.
@@andrewgreen5892 - “comparatively few” 😆😆😆😆
@@gnasher688Proportion UK takes is considerably less than others, including much poorer countries. Yet the British cry loudest, and our 'leaders' use them as a PR vehicle, whilst shovelling in hordes legally to lower our wages. We have actually hit the bottom.
Stay in the very first 'safe country' you enter, and apply for asylum there. You'd be better off.
Unless their second language is English maybe?
@@gb8628so pick and choose cuz a small issue? THAT LITERALLY DEFEATS AN ASYLUM CLAIM.... I fear for my life, goes to France a super safe country. Naw I'd rather risk my life to get to UK cuz I want English and money. Hmmm doesn't sound very fearful for their lives 🙂↔️🙂↔️🙂↔️🙂↔️
Unimaginable trauma.....in France no less
Yes actually
Perhaps Northern Ireland should put in a rowanda policy too!!
Pay the Houthis and Somali pirates to patrol the UK shoreline….
Bring back the Americans, they got arms, we could build a wall!
I thought UK was paying France big money to stop this carry on . We need to stop these boats, turn them round before they get into UK waters.
Actually, you may not have realised it, but you did say "big money to stop this Carry On"
Are you talking about "big money " for the investors, politicians and their mates?
In French waters?
what parent thinks, "we're in France, let's get in a dinghy with a small child" madness. you are already in France
People who speak English rather than French? It's not exactly that complicated!
This lady has all these ideas that should be set up for these people, but not once did she explain who is supposed to fund all of these ideas because it certainly isnt going to just magically appear. We dont have an endless pot of money to help everyone, and we dont have endless resources either, we have to be realistic, we cant help wvery single person.
If we are helping peoole it should be the ones who applied for asylum legally and followed the rules, and its incredibly insulting to them seeing people crossing illegally so they can get what they want faster than going down the procedure route.
If people cross illegally, they should not be allowed in and should never be allowed in, there are many many people who flee their country and apply legally, they should be the ones to get the help.
Also if they want a country to help, it shouldnt matter if it is here or another country, surely they should be grateful for any help they do get, and if they dont like what they are offered they dont have to accept it. But we should not then be obligated to offer something else, they should either take what is on offer, or leave, genuinely desperate people would take whatever they are offered becsuse its better than nothing. Again, we dont have endless space and money.
Israel had a "voluntary departure" scheme for 4,000 migrant deportations with Rwanda between 2014 and 2017. Most were driven straight to the border. Almost all are thought to have left the country almost immediately, with many attempting to return to Europe via people-smuggling routes.
Australia calling. Remind me what happened there again?
@@gb8628Australia deal was nothing like our deal. They had agreements with a few countries to take them and they turned boats back with navy escorts and if they had landed rounded them up and put them on their own boats and took them. And they got processed at the other end. Our deal is one way only. Nothing like the Australian deal at all.
@@royboy565 I was more on about us sending our convicts there.
I got an idea, how about we give it back to the Aborigines and repatriate all of our emigrants?
"free candy"
-tories
Also, don't bother to build enough houses, let rents soar.
Profit.
tories
Is this an attempt at sympathy?
Fraid it won't work channel 4
We don't want ANY of them
Says the person who's no doubt going to be complaining about the lack of Doctors and Nurses in their next comment.
@gb8628 hate to break it to you Ahmed, but 99% of your boyfriends have not come here to make a positive contribution to the country
@DannyWaring speaking for yourself Karen?
@gb8628 you are not very bright are you?
RNLI taxi service.
RNLI = Treason
free with bonuses from lawyers for crew
Tories created this . Disgusting.
Im leftwing, im voting tory. I aint joking. We cant just accept anyone.
My wife (who is Nigerian) has a visa, it cost about 5k! Why should unvetted nutters just choose where they can settle when the entire history of civilization is about barriers and boundaries?
How?
well no - the settlers are creating this when they come to steal our wealth and occupy our lands.
@@belkentensby trying to put a deterrent in place apparently
Actually Tony Blair created this by removing borders, and at the same time removing the power of the people to say no.
So their plane is to take every single boat carrying 100 people plus more then 10 times a month to Rwanda? What a stupid plan 🤣
Think Rwanda can only take a couple of hundred and we have to take the Rwandans in exchange.
better than Labours plan to invite every drifter in the world ( on the run for various crimes ) into a lifetime of benefit sponging ....Sweden is in ruins , France is lost
@@bigbinji6145 When did this problem start? Was it under Labour? No.
@@bigbinji6145 Why do righty types resort to melodramatic mythology to justify their arguments? Sweden in ruins? LOL.
Rwanda will only take about 200 or so a year and UK is to take some of rwandan 's undesirables in return. The most ridiculous policy ever thought of by a U K govt.
There is still hope.
So What Your Saying Is,,The Dangers They Are Running From Is "THEMSELVES" Suicidal People ,🤔
& It's our duty to fix them, whilst around our Kids....😂
RWANDA IS 💯 BETTER THEN WHERE THEY COME FROM,
,Be thankful in safety & the rest is what you make it.👍🏼 and if you don't contribute happily there, then we don't need to feel guilty Here...😊
Do well There & make Us Want You Here.. 🙏🏼
In principle it will, but the cost is so high, the uk government might find it cheaper to give the migrants a million pounds each and let them buy their own airfare home.
Labour has no effective alternative plane, as it depends on the cooperation of other countries, something which is not in their interests.
😞THIS PROBLEM IS VERY COMPLEX: RWANDA IS NOT THE UNIQUE APPROACHE TO MITIGATE IT.😞
what about the mental health of the citizens of this country who have to deal with the increased crime commited by these undocumented military aged men? If the government will release the crime figures of crimes commited by country of origin, you will see how it's far more migrants from muslim countries than the UK natives, like it is in Denmark
Will can come to school in Eastern Europe, schools are free, health care is free, in Eastern Europe we have the lowest unemployment rate, shops are open on Sundays, you can earn extra money on weekends. Eastern Europe, Intermarium countries need workers for factories in industry, processing, for highway construction, road traffic, paving stone sidewalks, infrastructure
You can't really tell if this will work unless you try it.
But at what cost? What are the risks? We don’t even have an exact number how many will actually go. You really happy to pay that amount of money even there is a high chance it won’t work or the effect is limited? And it is so expensive already.
We can. It won't work. You can't deter people who are willing to risk their lives with the 1000:1 chance that they might get deported somewhere else. It's simply too expensive to send more than a few people a year - so that's probably more like 10,000:1 or higher. Pretty good odds, for anyone who decides to come.
The Rwanda govt are only going to take about 200 a year. It's in the agreement. A check on line spells this out plus the UK is taking rwandan undesirables in exchange so the figure may not even be as high as 200 when you include rwandan intake.
All the government has to do is open a processing centre in Calais would cost £20 million France are up for it too. You process the refugees before the gangs get to them. Also because of brexit we have lost returns policy with our neighbours.
They are in France, they are safe there, if they wish to come here they are then economic migrants. Apply for a working visa like everyone else does.
@@andrewtowell6074 thats what a processing centre does
@@genesis1765I don't think Andrew understands the UN convention.
so sad . Condolences .
The Rwanda bill is a politically expedient decision that will ultimately harm Britain's economy. Small businesses and the agricultural sector rely on low-cost labour to operate. Numerous studies have shown that migrant workers (such as channel cross) to work in these sectors earn less than £6 per hour, but are content with their wages. Shockingly, 85% of Britons are unaware that these industries depend on such low-paid workers. These businesses cannot compete in the market if they are unable to provide affordable products to consumers, making low-cost labour a crucial element in their survival.
They're not desperately
France is safe
Simpleton, do they set off in a dinghy from Afghanistan?
😂 😂😂 France 🇫🇷 is happy to let them come to the UK :)
@maximemaxime7705 England seems happy to send them to Africa. (Australia is far too expensive nowadays ofc)
@@gb8628 you mean Rwanda. You do realise that Africa is not a country ? You do realise the deal is between the UK and Rwanda? You do realise that Rwanda is an country in Africa but Africa is a continent?
Your country do whatever they want to do but reading people from the other side of the Channel trying to tell France what they should do is funny but also meaningless.
@@maximemaxime7705I always thought Africa was a continent, and Kenya was a country.
What's your point?
We should all Thank the French for their exports in Rubber
Britain's new name should be Sardine Tin.
Here's how it actually works. Currently they come over during daylight hours sail into ports and hand themselves over the government then have to house / support them and record / publish their numbers. Now however they will have to sneak over at night vanish into the countryside and support themselves. No numbers will be recorded so illegal immigration will look like its falling as will the cost of housing them. Rwanda is about getting them to not show on the figures not actually solve anything nor deter anyone.
I'm sure the comments on this video are going to be great.
Indeed.
All those people would be alive if they stopped the boats a long time ago.
Free Free The UK….
@@wjumeau The boats could have been stopped by having a working system to process asylum seekers. But the Tories preferred to use this situation as a political ladle to stir up the public.
@@Geffo555 I think you will find, no matter who is in power, they cannot stop the boats.
They have ua-cam.com/video/Ctv0x3jWQM8/v-deo.htmlsi=S4DCPGpEVWwbB4wMto to do what they are told….
They have no power, why do you think it still continues.
Would Iran allow us to rock upto their coast unchallenged….
@@Geffo555 is France unsafe? Asylum claims means fear for their lives. They are already in France. Their claim right then and there is relieved. Picking and choosing like it's a vacation home the UK..... Literally risking their lives AGAIN to illegally cross the channel! They thus don't care for their lives and aren't fearful and are you ready..... Don't have a legit asylum claim. Common sense 101. Explain to me, why they aren't safe in France. I need a real answer.
No, it won't solve anything. It's not designed to deter anyone. Even if the flights get the go-ahead, it's going to cost millions.
My guess... No.
Stopping the boats would stop rhe boats 🤡🥱🙄
Shhh that's common sense they hate that 🙂↔️
Why are their countries no good?
Do you even English?
They are in Eu , why don’t they stay there ? C4 tells us the EU is a wonderful paradise, so why don’t the migrants stay there ? They prefer Soft Touch Benefits Britain
@@user-dq6nj1zv9h says the person who most likely has never had to deal with benefits at all (unless their secretary or financial advisor had to sort it out)
@@user-dq6nj1zv9hUK gives less benefits than most of the E U countries. Look it up.
The UK is a signatory of the 1951 Refugee Convention which clearly states that refugees have the right not to be penalised for being in or entering a country without permission where this is necessary for them to seek and receive asylum. The Convention provides an international definition of the world ‘refugee’, which is a person in another country at risk of persecution in her, his or their own country. It sets out certain basic rights of refugees that are necessary for the enjoyment of asylum. These include the right not to be returned to a place where they are at risk of persecution.
Those who fail to get asylum, remain refugees and under the protections of the convention.
They should be returned to their home country when their country is safe. It makes no mention of a right to return them to the country they crossed in from.
That right was created in the EU, via the Dublin Accords.
Shame on the RNLI
Absolutely disgraceful bringing them criminals to our shores
In this whole wider immigration debate, there’s a subtle difference between ‘multiculturalism’ and ‘multiethnicism’. I have a problem with the former if it means each separate cultural group living their own lives parallel and separate from the broad main national culture, which I really only see in a cohort of Muslims. However, I have zero issue with multiethnicism. The colour of your skin bothers me not a jot; it’s only your _ideas_ I care about, and the ideas tend to come into play with ‘multiculturalism’ and separate cultures living side by side. I tend to see only a lack of integration in a cohort of Muslims. I don’t see it in Chinese/Indians/Poles/ etc. Another thing I would say is that I have lived for long stretches in several places around the world and in every single one of these places only 3 things was asked of me: speak the language, pay taxes and don’t break the law. Now, obviously, I wasn’t living in these places permanently, but tbh, that’s all I really ask of those who come here. Most do these things _and_ as they produce generations, these generations tend to meld with the whole. It’s only a rump of Muslims who want none of this.
Actually there are multiple polls that show that most Muslims in the UK are more likely to define themselves as 'British' than the average Brit + the vast, vast majority of British Muslims speak near-native English (whereas most Brits don't speak any second language at all)
@@andrewgreen5892 I would generally agree with most of that. However, as a lifelong agnostic, I have very little time for _any_ organised religion. However, the thing that should be said is that I feel zero threat from any organised religion, bar one. If I were a public figure and publicly castigated Jesus, or Moses, or Krishna, or Buddha, or the Flying Spaghetti Monster, it’s very likely nothing would happen to me. If I publicly slagged off Muhammad, it’s quite likely there’d be a backlash and I’d be watching my back for the rest of my life. _That’s_ the difference. Just ask Salman Rushdie or the Batley teacher who, btw, didn’t even _criticise_ Muhammad; he just showed a damn picture! Imagine living in a society where certain people are so offended by a cartoon, they threaten death to the person who showed it! If certain people are so ‘offended’ by a cartoon, then it’s time to question the belief, not the cartoon. It seems Islam is so trigger-sensitive it can’t take honest criticism, when it’s just a bunch of manmade ideas like all the rest. Never let _anyone_ tell you it’s ‘racist’ or a ‘hate-crime’ to criticise Islam. Islam is a belief-system held by people of multifarious races. Islam seems to think it’s entitled to a free pass when it comes to scrutiny. If Christianity, Judaism, Buddhism, Hinduism, Spaghettiism, etc. are subject to criticism, then Islam is too.
@@titteryenot4524
Too long and boring Jock poshboy
@@andrewgreen5892 Just as a point of order, can you provide a link for your claim about ‘multiple polls’ as having searched, I can’t seem to find any? 🤔
@@andrewgreen5892
There aren’t any polls are there Andrew?
You just made this up so you could join in
Nice one jock 😉
It won’t stop them …government clowns
If the media people were on the beach when the boats started out..why did they not call the French police..? Woudld be nice to see some evidence that the millions we give France to stop them actually did anything
You know that's not how the media work right?
Oh dear.. STOP trafficking them then..
?
Devastating….just devastating. I can’t stop crying 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Im so confused why risk ur childrens safety leaving a safe country to get to Britian. It cant be just to get benefits. Its like the people who put religion or land before there children. UR CHILDS WELFARE AND FUTURE HAPPINESS is more important than cash, religion or land or anything else shocking
Oh dear, what a shame
Stella braverman has the credit for thus...not the clowns inbgovernment right now.
Suella Braverman is the clown who wanted this ridiculous policy. It beggars belief that some wanted her as leader.
Credit? Good joke.
The reason they travel across the channel is because they are forced to live in tents in france and hotels in the uk. This is the pull factor.
Still a safe country. Thus choosing to get the most benefits defeats their asylum claims anyways. They aren't going to be killed in France for being themselves. Thus UK should auto ban them as they were already safe. These people think they can pick and choose like it's a vacation home thus they aren't fearful for their lives and are you ready...... Don't have legit asylum claims. Why is it hard for people to understand? Common sense 101.
If those that have not found it out yet. Kagame is a stooge. How do you think he has gotten away with critiquing them West and still be in power? Diamonds, colbalt, etc, for humans and security to his regime.
The prime minister is delusional. The Rwanda deal will make little difference. All the Albanians have gone back to hiding in lorries and are still coming yet we don't hear about that. Push back the boats and don't allow anyone to stay in the UK If they enter illegaly. Follow the way the Australia did it. It is proven to work.
You mean send all our convicts there? How about we repatriate them all back here and give it back to the Aborigines?
Say it loud say it clear refugees are welcome here just not at my house
What would happen if King Charles said "nah I'm not signing this bullshit" ?
😂
imagine if he refused to sign something you voted for and agreed with. guarantee you would be calling for an end to the monarchy and i bet you are a big fan of the unelected house of lords right now aswell
@@markybthebadboymcmaybe the monarchy would be worth something rather than a rubber stamp and a very, very expensive tourist attraction.
I've volunteered with refugees in Greece for many years. If you think this policy will put people off you are bonkers. I'm guessing they never actually spoken to a single refugee. Waste of time and money. One thinks that the only real reason for this is to appeal to ring wing voters.
I can't think of any other reason
A vastly expensive gimmick. It's obscene when you think there are actually people going hungry in UK .
The solution is : stay out of people's countries and stop destabilising their homelands and they won't try to cross a whole continent to get to a miserable rat-hole !
It’s terrible but they shouldn’t be coming here they were safe in France
Such stupidity, the reason they are in France is because the UK is the destination.
Stop rescuing them and there stop coming why are you dealing with the french plus Albanians
Oh allah
Oh Alan.
It won't stop because the French will keep sending them
I wonder how many of the people who say "stay in France" actually speak French and would be comfortable in starting from scratch (and by that I mean absolutely rock bottom) in a country where they cannot understand a single word they are told.
How many refugees live under your roof at YOUR expense?
If the illegal immigrants cannot stay . Then are all those here if toi can find them. Are they going to be deported ???😮
Èndless resources of Oil Coal Gas Gold Diamonds, Lithium Water Arable fertile lands, Forests, Timber, Lakes Mountains massive land mass, 1.6 billion work force, Beautiful Climate, Near Europe for trade, Seas for fisher's. Yet EU UN WEF push their young men out to a country with meager resources and awful climate, but speaks English and can be guilt tripped into accepting anonymous young men... Strange
And
Happy travels to beautiful Rwanda!
Oh no..... Rwanda will miss those Drs and builders of the new world.
It really is snakes and ladders now 😅😅😅
Got to question the mentality of these people...our mental health services are already stretched. What kind of mother or father puts their child's life in danger.😢😢
Stoupt
Do not donate to the RNLI
Hope you never had swimming lessons.
@@mattbrownartwork I wouldn't swim in the sea...stupid idea. I wouldn't attempt to illegally enter a country, whether by boat or other means. And I won't support an organisation that facilitates the arrival of said immigrants 😁
Every time I see this BS comment I'm going to donate.
@@gb8628Same here.
@@gb8628 You're letting it upset you.
PM is incredibly sad about it all ..... like a blind elephant trying to walk across eggshells ......... useless if the law was tough enough, it would never have happened in the first place .....
They could make safe, regulated routes, but don't and also never say why. Because it will lose votes, simple. They, and I guess, most of the British people, dont care how many die.
GET HIM OFF - MR . SPARE ROOM .
Vile Tories.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Why not leaflet drop the French coast saying " welcome to Rawanda "
Imagine risking life and limb to migrate to UK only to be deported to a flat in Rwanda whose prior inhabitants were genocided
Only about 1%of boat people will end up in Rwanda. It is not a deterrent.
It won’t make any difference at all, these people are desperate - they don’t risk theirs’ & their children’s lives for nothing! Sunak is just playing to the Daily Mail / Farage gallery. Quite sickening really!
OK, if they are so desperate and just want help then surely they would find the NEAREST country that could take them in, many of then travel through multiple countries that are safe, and yet they choose to risk their lives and the lives of their children to get onto a crowded unsafe boat to come to the UK, why?
If these people are just so desperate and just want to be safe, then they should go to the nearest country that is safe, not continue travelling thousands of miles, they should not be allowed to pick and choose where they go based on what they can get.
Also you're forgetting that these people are trying to get in illegally. There is a legal way to claim asylum that MANY people follow, these people however want to jump the queue or decide they don't want to wait in France so they get on the boats knowing they can get hotels instead of tents, there have been many people the news have filmed who actively admit that they could stay in France but don't want to becsyse the UK offers more, but they don't want to stay in tents while they wait in France for a decision on their applications so they get into boats.
If these people are expecting other countries to support them, they should not be able to choose where they go, anyone who claims to be desperate would accept any help, not shop around for better deals.
Come on loser answer the other comment here! Is France unsafe?
👍🤣😅🤣😅👍
RWANDA ? FFS . THEY SHOULDN 'T BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE .
COSTING THE TAX -PAYER MILLIONS . BUT WHAT IS COMING BACK ON THE RETURN FLIGHT ? COCONUT AIRWAYS ARE HAVING DOUBTS .
Do they believe there is a gold pot on the other side of the rainbow?
People who dislike the Rwanda bill: afghan and bangaledeshi man pretending to be British 😂😂 relax it’s too obvious
YES BUT WHAT ABOUT OUR MENTAL HEALTH? THERE ARE NO BEDS FOR ACUTELY ILL PEOPLE NOR CAN YOU EVEN GET THROUGH TO SOMEONE BY PHONE. We have our OWN struggles, homeless, lack of free higher education, zero hour contracts etc.
Blame 14 years of tory govt and it's incompetence.
انَا اختكمَ مَن اليمَن وّالَلَه ماتكلمتَ الَا من جوّع وًّمَنَ ضَيَقَ الَحَالَ انَا وًّامَيَ وًّاخَوًّتَيَ تَشَرَدَنَا مَنَ بَيَوًّتَنَا بَسَبَبَ الَحَرَبَ نَحَنَ فَيَ حَالَهَ لَايَعَلَمَ بَهَا الَا الَلَهَ حَسَبَنَا الَلَهَ وًّنَعَمَ الَوكيَلَ فَيَ مَنَ اوًّصَلَنَا الَى هَاذا الَحَالَ 💔💔وًّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ مَا كتَبَتَ هَذا الَمَنَاشَدَهَ غَيَرَ مَنَ الَضَيَقَ وّالَفَقَر يَاعَالَمَ حَسَوّا فَيَنَا ارَجَوّكمَ وّالَلَهَ الَعَظَيَمَ رَبَ الَعَرَشَ الَعَظَيَمَ انَه الَاكلَ مَا فَيَ عَنَدَيَ بَالَبَيَتَ وًّالَلَهَ يَا اخَوّانَيَ انَهَ اخَوًّنَيَ بَقَعَدَوًّ بَالَيَوًّمَيَنَ مَافَى اكلَ وًّالَلَهَ وًّضَعَنَا كثَيَرَ صَعَبَ نَحَنَ 4 نَفَرَ دَاخَلَ الَبَيَتَ وًّابَيَ مَتَوًّفَيَ وًّلَا يَوًّجَدَ مَنَ يَعَوًّلَ عَلَيَنَا وًّسَاكنَيَنَ فَيَ بَيَتَ اجَارَ لَانَسَتَطَيَعَ دَفَعَ الَاجَارَ الَلَيَ بَاقَيَ عَلَيَنَا ''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''' اخي اول كلامي انا اقسم بالله على كتاب الله اني لااكذب عليك ولا انصب ولا احتال اني بنت يمنيه نازحين من الحرب انا واسرتي بيننا ایت الشهرب 14 الف يمني والان علينا 42 الف حق 3 شهور وصاحب البيت من الناس الي ماترحم والله يا اخي انه يجي كل يوم يبهدلنا ويتكلم علينا ويريد من البيت للشارع لانناماقدرنا ندفعله الأجار شافونا الجيران نبكي ورجعو تكلمو الجيران ومهلنالاخره الأسبوع معادفعنا له حلف يمين بالله هذا بيخرجنا إلى الشارع رحمه واحنا. بلادنا بسبب هذا الحرب ولانجد قوت يومنا وعايشين اناوامي واخوتي سفار والدنا متوفي الله يرحمه ومامعنا أحد في هذا الدنيا جاانبنا في هذه الظروف القاسيه اخوتي الصغار خرجو للشارع وشافو الجيران ياكلو واوقفو عند بابهم لجل يعطوهم ولو كسره خبز والله الذي له ملك السموات والارض انهم غلفو الباب وطردوهم ورجعو یبکو ایموتو من الجوع ما احد رحمهم وعطلة ردها لقمت عیش والان لوما احدنا ساعدنا في إيكيلو دقيق اقسم بالله انموت من الجوع فيا اخي انا دخيله على الله ثم عليك واريد منك المساعده لوجه الله انشدك بالله تحب الخير واتساعدني ولو ب 500 ريال يمني مع تراسلي واتساب على هذا الرقم 00967717354582 وتطلب اسم بطاقتي وترسلي ولاتتاخر وايعوضك الله بكل خير اخواني سغار شوف كيف حالتهم وساعدنا وأنقذنا قبل أن يطردونا في الشارع تتبهدل أو نموت من الجوع وانا واسرتي نسالك بالله لولك مقدره على مساعد لاتتاخر علينا وجزاك الله خيرا،.،.،:^:؛^:🎉°~°~^~°^π√^π√~π~√~√~π^~^~π~π~√√~~ππ~π√~~^^°^°€€لب😢❤❤😢❤😢❤❤
Labours to blame
The Conservatives are in their FOURTEENTH year in power and are still blaming everyone else.
The small boat crossings are a distraction from the fact that the Conservatives have done nothing to reduce legal immigration over the past FOURTEEN years and let in one million in the last two years.
In Jan 2010, David Cameron said net migration of over 200,000 was too much and promised to reduce net migration to "tens of thousands. A net figure of over one million legally migrated here in the last two years.
A net figure of over one million legally migrated here in the last two years.
In 2022, a net figure of 606,000 migrated here. 2021: 488,000.
The Conservatives are in their FOURTEENTH year in power and are still blaming everyone else but themselves.
The latest official estimates show that net migration in the year to June 2023 was 672,000 - up significantly on pre-pandemic volumes but lower than the 745,000 who came in the year to December 2022.
@@FontaineDerbyTony Blair......
How so? They haven’t been in government since 2010?
@@susanwestern6434 You seem to have forgotten to type the rest of your "comment" or don't actually have a real point to make.
The highest legal immigration figures under this tory govt. The highest illegal immigration figures under this tory govt. End of message.
London has fallen
Keir Starmer will address the open borders issues and take the country forward after the next General election.
So final stage is Royal Assent. If King doesn’t agree with the humanitarian issues surrounding this, can he refuse to sign it?
Did our Queen ever refuse to sign anything that she didn’t agree with or is it very much agreeing to everything the ruling government puts up for Royal Assent?
Sadly when it comes to royal ascent the king (and the queen before him) are little more than a glorified civil servant, so no matter how much they disagree with something, they have no choice but to sign it... 😕
@@df6957In actual fact the King has three options, he can sign, delay his signature for a period of time and he can in fact refuse to sign if he thinks the proposed bill is a danger physicality or morally to the uk. He would take advice from his ministers and then decide. If he refused to sign it could mean the dissolution of parliament.
Ho hum shouldn't have come.
brexit making british people hungry and now rwanda lol, what next
Allahu snackbar
Like I've said before who cares less they took the risk
They should of stopped in France
Spoken like a true right wing tory.
Stop coming it’s simple
Racist 😢