According to today's SJWs, since he was a white European, he must have been a devil, and therefore deserved whatever misfortune befell him...our youth are so precocious...
It was, at least in my german school we had him in history classes. Tho, that was over a decade ago. So I can not say if it´s the same today. But he is still fondly remembered by those who know their history. In germany hospitals and schools are named after him, there are also Organizations and a Humanitarianism award with his name.
@@chokkan7 According to the other side, since he was helping Black people out of the goodness of his heart, he must have been a bleeding heart socialist libtard. See how dumb this is?
What is shown here really did happen., being ordered by the French to leave . But after the First world war in 1924 he returned . Setting up a new hospital with a full staff . Before going back to Europe 1927. In about 1935 he went back and worked at the hospital right through the second world war. And was Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize of 1952 .
Alex Taylor come down off your high horse.Dr.schwitzer was not a one worlder.He deserved the honors he recieved by hard work and a lot of personal hardship.To go to Africa as he did should be applauded.It would be if you became a little less stringent about a rea threat
Lazarus0357 if it encourages you, Schweitzer was allowed back after the war (partly because his area of Germany was ceded to France and he by default became a French citizen) and spent the rest of his life running that hospital. It's still running today
As this clip shows, the Allies could be every bit as ruthless & heartless as the Germans. Hundreds of thousands of German civilians died AFTER the armistice because the Allies continued the naval blockade of Germany until it agreed to the terms of Versailes.
@saulpaulus, The Brits were vindictive for sure. The war was over even though it was at an armistice. The prevention of food and medicines was ruthless and without justification. The Bible teaches in Matthew 22:37-40 the two great commandments: love God and love one's neighbors. The Brits showed neither in maintaining the blockade. Politics is violence and political governments, no matter their makes, models or flavors, are the bane of humanity; the are immoral; they are not Christian. Voting sanctions political force and thereby it is an act of violence.
And they didn't do jack to help Tsar Nicholas and the Romanovs escape the Russian revolution, yeah he may have been an autocrat and Russia in need of reform but he and his family's deaths at the hands of the Bolsheviks weren't necessary and could have been prevented. Say what you want about Imperial rule and the treatment of serfs, but his toddler son definitely did not deserve to die. I guess allies in the day turn enemies in the night as they say, the Italian betrayal of the Central Powers, George V's inability to help his relatives in Russia, the London and Washington Naval Treaties allowing American and Britain more tonnage than anyone else, the Entente getting mad at Germany for gas warfare usage despite also using gas back, the League of Nations condemning Japanese empire building in Manchuria while ignoring the other massive empires in Africa according to some people, the Sykes Picot agreement according to some other people, allowing Hitler to: remilitarize the Rhineland, annex Austria, take the Suddetland and promise not to invade the rest of Czechoslovakia, invade the rest of Czechoslovakia anyway, all while standing by, and even then abandon Poland to its fate when they did declare war by stopping the offensive in the West, then list goes on. No one is good or bad white or black, just a spectrum of grey. However objectively some are black like the Nazis and Soviets but still even the Western Allies weren't all that great.
@@JBGARINGAN Rescuing the Romanovs--apart from whether they deserved to be rescued--would have been a long shot. KGV made a decision not to allow them to come to Britain and a book I have read suggests that they were unlikely to have left Russia under any circumstances even if it had been possible. Not sure I'd call Italy's changing sides a betrayal. They initially allied with Germany out of fear of Britain and France. When the Allies settled into trench warfare, the Italians saw that the real danger lay with their historic enemies the Austro-Hungarians. The Allies weren't pure and perfect in WW 2 BUT the Holocaust and the unspeakable horrors of German and Japanese occupation make them easily the worse offenders.
I'll take your word on the Romanovs, and I also agree the Nazis and the Japanese are on the blacker side of the spectrum and of course the allies towards the lighter side being the liberators. However on the Italian subject, the pre-war Central Powers agreement was that they would not declare war without consulting the other members and that Italy would only become involved if it were a defensive war, Austria initially declared war on Serbia only consulting the Germans, Italy was neither consulted nor was it going to join an offensive war. From what we can tell now the Germans and the Austrians respected this, only trying to persuade the Italians into joining them instead of outright demanding they do like offering parts of their own land in compensation for annulling the original agreement. The Italians meanwhile were also considering the Entente's proposals, and they were MUCH more liberal with their promises of Austria-Hungary's land that they did not have and could not yet give until the end of the war and ironically conflicted with Serbian plans to become a Balkan power (the Serbians were the whole reason this started and who the Entente had come to defend in the first place.) They weren't obligated to join the Central Powers and could've stayed neutral in the war, which they did for one year until joining against their former allies in 1915. They were clearly in it for their own gain. It seems that Italy was under the impression it would receive much more than it actually got in the end, they wanted to have control over the Balkan side of the Adriatic Sea which the allies did not give them, the new nation of Yugoslavia received these lands(the Serbs got the coastline). This is evident because this is one of the integral national desires that Mussolini took advantage of, the Italians after WW1 felt they were cheated by the allies for only getting Venezia, South Tyrol, Trentino, and Triest. They were unsatisfied with the lands they received, thinking that Italy deserved more for the sacrifice. This so called "Mutilated Victory" Mussolini used to stir the population of Italy into making him Duce. In short, Italy was underhandedly playing both sides to see what was in it for them and turned against what was previously their allies, they chose the more rewarding yet disingenuous offer, and in the end they didn't get all of their desired rewards and felt betrayed which I say is ironic, and many others say is what they deserved. Now yes there is the argument that Italy wasn't bound to the Central Powers anymore and therefore it shouldn't be held against them that they were free to choose whichever side they felt. However regardless of what disagreements we may have about Italy, we can both agree this is another example of the Entente's duplicity.
@@LadyVader33 Basically what we see in the Dr., but with the motivation being in the Lord Jesus Christ according to Scripture. Ephesian 2: 8- 10; Titus 2: 11-14 God bless!
Really liked this film. Thanks so much for posting. It is these "obscure" films that have become the most meaningful to me. I particularly liked the line from the Australian film Breaker Morant" ( Australian Carbineers sacrificed as "appeasement" by English to Germany who sympathised with Dutch Boers) when the defending attorney quite eloquently argued that war makes ordinary men do some really bad things. All sides, all countries, all soldiers are capable of doing abhorrent things in war. Why therefore all this German kettle calling the French teapot black commentary?
For those of you who are wondering what the music at the end is, it is... Mozart K.622 Clarinet Concerto 2nd mov. Adagio and Bach: Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring Thx for the post "Junior"
Whether it's historically accurate or not isn't entirely the point of the films, it makes a point to just how harrowing WW1 really was. Millions dead and twice more suffering and all because of bureaucracy, arrogance and nationalism. Blanket laws hurt more than anything and so the local tribes depicted will further suffer.
I only know that the mustachioed detective Hercule Poirot would erupt when people would refer to him as French. "I am NOT French, I am Belge!!!" he would yell.
Sad as it is the French Capitan was correct, he has his orders and as both an officer and a man it is his duty to carry them out for the good of France
What is this? Militaries don't argue orders all the time like this. This crybaby captain even argues orders of the French government on French territory and he gets away with it ??
***** Yes, I don't think he would get away with it if in France during the war. And I did know either there was a dislike between the BE and the FR. I think it was more like a revelry. Belgium was a very rich country before WWI, maybe they were looking down on the French but nothing serious I would think.
Jpm the Belgians had a quite a big dislike of the French due to Napoleon only 100 years prior to this. also throughout history the French have tended to bully the Belgians (or at least what now makes up Belgium)
some may don't know but the French faction portrayed in this part is actually resembles the real French colonizer system, full of bureaucracy, mistreats and violation over people's lives. In Vietnam, as we are taught at school, the French who used to colonize us in the past is very cruel against indigenous people. Whenever Vietnamese people revolted back against the French to gain back freedom and human rights, those movements were notoriously crushed down and ended up in bloodbath. After each fight such that, the French did all horrendous things to ensure their control over people: burn down villages, kill innocent people (even fetus and children), destroy livelihoods of people, take incorporate individuals to prison and let them rotten in there for decades. They poisoned their colonize land with toxic policy, as an example I will give you next. In economy, they sold to Vietnamese people more beverages, alcohol liquids mostly from French, ceased the import of those from other nations (by heavy taxing), and they did coerce Vietnamese to consume and get addicted to those. The French even systematically lower down the cost of French alcohol on the market at that period (even lower than cost of vegetables or any foods and drinks). Thus, most Vietnamese at that time remained poor, uneducated and got severely addicted to alcoholic products. School was inaccessible, as only the upper class in society and royal members were able to receive education in the crumbled domestic economy. Even in school, the French also used education to bend the Vietnamese student's mind, so they can be French's system assistant and support the colonizer's twisted intention over the nation. Some of them later grown up held accountable for the action of supporting the French's inhuman colonization in Vietnam
Albert Schweizer was Alsacien French you fools even fiction should be slightly accurate no way to convince me with whatever message this movie is trying to send out
Alsaciens faced stigma from both France as Germany. Both questioned the locals' loyalties. Fun fact: after the war, when Germany had to reliquish it's hold on Alsace-Lorraine, the region was autonomous for 2 days before the French took it
![Christmas Truce of World War I -- Joyeux Noel [2005 film]](/img/n.gif)
Great movie.
The futility of war, the insanity of man and how it overtakes us all. Well communicated here.
Albert Schweitzer won the Nobel Peace Prize in 1952. Today's youth know little if nothing about him.
According to today's SJWs, since he was a white European, he must have been a devil, and therefore deserved whatever misfortune befell him...our youth are so precocious...
We learnt about him in school in India. Is his life not taught in other countries?
It was, at least in my german school we had him in history classes. Tho, that was over a decade ago. So I can not say if it´s the same today.
But he is still fondly remembered by those who know their history. In germany hospitals and schools are named after him, there are also Organizations and a Humanitarianism award with his name.
chokkan7 today's youth aren't taught to study history or think objectively
@@chokkan7 According to the other side, since he was helping Black people out of the goodness of his heart, he must have been a bleeding heart socialist libtard.
See how dumb this is?
Thank you for uploading sir / ma'am. I am a huge fans of Indiana Jones. From this episode, we can learn history and a very music.
Thank you again 🙇🙇🙇🙇
What is shown here really did happen., being ordered by the French to leave . But after the First world war in 1924 he returned . Setting up a new hospital with a full staff . Before going back to Europe 1927. In about 1935 he went back and worked at the hospital right through the second world war. And was Awarded the Nobel Peace Prize of 1952 .
welshpete12 his part of Germany was ceded to France after the war, so by default he fell under the protection of those who kicked him out
Alex Taylor come down off your high horse.Dr.schwitzer was not a one worlder.He deserved the honors he recieved by hard work and a lot of personal hardship.To go to Africa as he did should be applauded.It would be if you became a little less stringent about a rea threat
A real and present threat,don't go tilting at windmills needlessly!
I need MORE! this was great!! Love the human side of man during war!! We always talk about the horrors of war but always leave out the humanity.
Wonderful movie, I feel real sad after realising it is finished. Regards
Lazarus0357 if it encourages you, Schweitzer was allowed back after the war (partly because his area of Germany was ceded to France and he by default became a French citizen) and spent the rest of his life running that hospital. It's still running today
As this clip shows, the Allies could be every bit as ruthless & heartless as the Germans. Hundreds of thousands of German civilians died AFTER the armistice because the Allies continued the naval blockade of Germany until it agreed to the terms of Versailes.
saulpaulus that was only the start
@saulpaulus, The Brits were vindictive for sure. The war was over even though it was at an armistice. The prevention of food and medicines was ruthless and without justification. The Bible teaches in Matthew 22:37-40 the two great commandments: love God and love one's neighbors. The Brits showed neither in maintaining the blockade. Politics is violence and political governments, no matter their makes, models or flavors, are the bane of humanity; the are immoral; they are not Christian. Voting sanctions political force and thereby it is an act of violence.
And they didn't do jack to help Tsar Nicholas and the Romanovs escape the Russian revolution, yeah he may have been an autocrat and Russia in need of reform but he and his family's deaths at the hands of the Bolsheviks weren't necessary and could have been prevented. Say what you want about Imperial rule and the treatment of serfs, but his toddler son definitely did not deserve to die. I guess allies in the day turn enemies in the night as they say, the Italian betrayal of the Central Powers, George V's inability to help his relatives in Russia, the London and Washington Naval Treaties allowing American and Britain more tonnage than anyone else, the Entente getting mad at Germany for gas warfare usage despite also using gas back, the League of Nations condemning Japanese empire building in Manchuria while ignoring the other massive empires in Africa according to some people, the Sykes Picot agreement according to some other people, allowing Hitler to: remilitarize the Rhineland, annex Austria, take the Suddetland and promise not to invade the rest of Czechoslovakia, invade the rest of Czechoslovakia anyway, all while standing by, and even then abandon Poland to its fate when they did declare war by stopping the offensive in the West, then list goes on. No one is good or bad white or black, just a spectrum of grey. However objectively some are black like the Nazis and Soviets but still even the Western Allies weren't all that great.
@@JBGARINGAN Rescuing the Romanovs--apart from whether they deserved to be rescued--would have been a long shot. KGV made a decision not to allow them to come to Britain and a book I have read suggests that they were unlikely to have left Russia under any circumstances even if it had been possible.
Not sure I'd call Italy's changing sides a betrayal. They initially allied with Germany out of fear of Britain and France. When the Allies settled into trench warfare, the Italians saw that the real danger lay with their historic enemies the Austro-Hungarians.
The Allies weren't pure and perfect in WW 2 BUT the Holocaust and the unspeakable horrors of German and Japanese occupation make them easily the worse offenders.
I'll take your word on the Romanovs, and I also agree the Nazis and the Japanese are on the blacker side of the spectrum and of course the allies towards the lighter side being the liberators. However on the Italian subject, the pre-war Central Powers agreement was that they would not declare war without consulting the other members and that Italy would only become involved if it were a defensive war, Austria initially declared war on Serbia only consulting the Germans, Italy was neither consulted nor was it going to join an offensive war. From what we can tell now the Germans and the Austrians respected this, only trying to persuade the Italians into joining them instead of outright demanding they do like offering parts of their own land in compensation for annulling the original agreement. The Italians meanwhile were also considering the Entente's proposals, and they were MUCH more liberal with their promises of Austria-Hungary's land that they did not have and could not yet give until the end of the war and ironically conflicted with Serbian plans to become a Balkan power (the Serbians were the whole reason this started and who the Entente had come to defend in the first place.) They weren't obligated to join the Central Powers and could've stayed neutral in the war, which they did for one year until joining against their former allies in 1915. They were clearly in it for their own gain. It seems that Italy was under the impression it would receive much more than it actually got in the end, they wanted to have control over the Balkan side of the Adriatic Sea which the allies did not give them, the new nation of Yugoslavia received these lands(the Serbs got the coastline). This is evident because this is one of the integral national desires that Mussolini took advantage of, the Italians after WW1 felt they were cheated by the allies for only getting Venezia, South Tyrol, Trentino, and Triest. They were unsatisfied with the lands they received, thinking that Italy deserved more for the sacrifice. This so called "Mutilated Victory" Mussolini used to stir the population of Italy into making him Duce.
In short, Italy was underhandedly playing both sides to see what was in it for them and turned against what was previously their allies, they chose the more rewarding yet disingenuous offer, and in the end they didn't get all of their desired rewards and felt betrayed which I say is ironic, and many others say is what they deserved. Now yes there is the argument that Italy wasn't bound to the Central Powers anymore and therefore it shouldn't be held against them that they were free to choose whichever side they felt. However regardless of what disagreements we may have about Italy, we can both agree this is another example of the Entente's duplicity.
Like Patton said: "I'd rather have a German division in front of me, than a French division in back of me"...
What a lovely adventure . i enjoyed every moment . Some great stories on this page . I am hooked .
This was truly wonderful. Thank you for blessing my evening!
I've really enjoyed this mini series the fact it is woven with true facts is a bonus thank you 😊
A little salvation is good for the Soul...!
The biggest understatement in the world !
What does that look like?
@@LadyVader33 Basically what we see in the Dr., but with the motivation being in the Lord Jesus Christ according to Scripture. Ephesian 2: 8- 10; Titus 2: 11-14 God bless!
This series is way better than the commercial movie series.
great movie, probably the best i saw in my life!
thanks so much!!!
Thank you for sharing ! really nice adventures !
Really liked this film. Thanks so much for posting. It is these "obscure" films that have become the most meaningful to me. I particularly liked the line from the Australian film Breaker Morant" ( Australian Carbineers sacrificed as "appeasement" by English to Germany who sympathised with Dutch Boers) when the defending attorney quite eloquently argued that war makes ordinary men do some really bad things. All sides, all countries, all soldiers are capable of doing abhorrent things in war. Why therefore all this German kettle calling the French teapot black commentary?
What a great film, thanks for uploading it.
Oganga - medicine man, literally the giver and taker of life. Albert Sweitzer as the giver, Joseph Mengele as the taker
Bobby Lim So which will you be? It's a day by day choice
@@LadyVader33 Dr. Sweitzer of course
Bobby Lim Or the best version of you :). Healing isn't solely relegated to medicine
Albert Schweitzer was Alsatian. Technically he could either be French or German depending on which he nationality he is willing to renounce.
I love your video
thanks Henry, I really enjoyed this movie.
For those of you who are wondering what the music at the end is, it is...
Mozart K.622 Clarinet Concerto 2nd mov. Adagio
and
Bach: Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring
Thx for the post "Junior"
@Alphonse Zukor, Oh thank you. I was wondering. Good on ya mate.
Whether it's historically accurate or not isn't entirely the point of the films, it makes a point to just how harrowing WW1 really was. Millions dead and twice more suffering and all because of bureaucracy, arrogance and nationalism. Blanket laws hurt more than anything and so the local tribes depicted will further suffer.
OMG such a profound movie!
6:39. I never knew there was a dislike between French and Belgians. Was there any mutual hatred between the two countries ?
Remy was great in that moment
I only know that the mustachioed detective Hercule Poirot would erupt when people would refer to him as French. "I am NOT French, I am Belge!!!" he would yell.
I like this video can you plz post more
Sad as it is the French Capitan was correct, he has his orders and as both an officer and a man it is his duty to carry them out for the good of France
6:13 the best threat I’ve ever heard in my life
So...when did Indy go into archeology?
He appreciated history, after he participated in it.
Only those who despise life is precious in God's eyes , will not be In God's book of life ! It is a choice to give life and let live!
To be in named in God's book of life, one must be saved through trusting in the Gospel of The Lord Jesus Christ. Romans 10: 9, 10, 12
superbe film
Oh no the conga line through the Congo was for nothing
Cmp., As the radiation grew, the Bach's sheet music was thrown into the garbage, to avoid to chemical alert, the keyboard - also...™ (2000's)
What is this? Militaries don't argue orders all the time like this. This crybaby captain even argues orders of the French government on French territory and he gets away with it ??
If he would have done that in France during the 1910s - he would have been lined up and shot.
***** Yes, I don't think he would get away with it if in France during the war.
And I did know either there was a dislike between the BE and the FR. I think it was more like a revelry.
Belgium was a very rich country before WWI, maybe they were looking down on the French but nothing serious I would think.
Jpm
Hell no. The French (we Europeans in general) were a pretty hardcore bunch back then.
Jpm the Belgians had a quite a big dislike of the French due to Napoleon only 100 years prior to this. also throughout history the French have tended to bully the Belgians (or at least what now makes up Belgium)
NoCommentatorGamer
Ah thank you. That explains it for me. Did that hatred extent to the French-speaking part of the population ?
some may don't know but the French faction portrayed in this part is actually resembles the real French colonizer system, full of bureaucracy, mistreats and violation over people's lives. In Vietnam, as we are taught at school, the French who used to colonize us in the past is very cruel against indigenous people. Whenever Vietnamese people revolted back against the French to gain back freedom and human rights, those movements were notoriously crushed down and ended up in bloodbath. After each fight such that, the French did all horrendous things to ensure their control over people: burn down villages, kill innocent people (even fetus and children), destroy livelihoods of people, take incorporate individuals to prison and let them rotten in there for decades.
They poisoned their colonize land with toxic policy, as an example I will give you next. In economy, they sold to Vietnamese people more beverages, alcohol liquids mostly from French, ceased the import of those from other nations (by heavy taxing), and they did coerce Vietnamese to consume and get addicted to those. The French even systematically lower down the cost of French alcohol on the market at that period (even lower than cost of vegetables or any foods and drinks). Thus, most Vietnamese at that time remained poor, uneducated and got severely addicted to alcoholic products. School was inaccessible, as only the upper class in society and royal members were able to receive education in the crumbled domestic economy. Even in school, the French also used education to bend the Vietnamese student's mind, so they can be French's system assistant and support the colonizer's twisted intention over the nation. Some of them later grown up held accountable for the action of supporting the French's inhuman colonization in Vietnam
lots of lessons to chew
great movie
What the uniform
Alvedersane mien freind
good bye oganga p-7
Tem brasileiro aqui
French froggy why don’t you go take a shower
adocsabsy 2753 Tolerance is so wonderful to see in such rich abundance.
Petty French beraucrats...seems nothing’s changed...2020, just look at their leaders...
Albert Schweizer was Alsacien French you fools even fiction should be slightly accurate no way to convince me with whatever message this movie is trying to send out
Alsaciens faced stigma from both France as Germany. Both questioned the locals' loyalties. Fun fact: after the war, when Germany had to reliquish it's hold on Alsace-Lorraine, the region was autonomous for 2 days before the French took it