MVS - 2017 Chrysler Pacifica Limited

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @matjaro
    @matjaro 8 років тому +2

    Great detailed coverage, well done !

  • @Randomdaredevil
    @Randomdaredevil 8 років тому +1

    Love the detail in this video. Great job!

  • @violetgao5807
    @violetgao5807 8 років тому +1

    Such a nice car!

  • @jamesanderson4014
    @jamesanderson4014 5 місяців тому

    Excellent review.

  • @flamingguy21
    @flamingguy21 8 років тому +13

    Is it just me or does anybody think this van looks better than some crossovers?

    • @cameronclark3927
      @cameronclark3927 8 років тому +3

      FlamingGuy21 it's just u

    • @flamingguy21
      @flamingguy21 8 років тому +1

      Cameron Clark I meant crossovers, not truck-based suvs. I find that crossovers don't look very nice, but truck-based suvs look nice.

    • @insideoli
      @insideoli 5 років тому

      It looks better than most crossovers.

  • @1MarkKeller
    @1MarkKeller 8 років тому +4

    The Limited may be a bit too rich for my bank account at the moment. Maybe leasing a Touring L or Touring L Plus for a few years and then upgrading to a lightly used fully loaded Limited.

  • @michaelalfonso9519
    @michaelalfonso9519 8 років тому +2

    The new Pacifica is built off of a completely new architecture. It is not built off of the same architecture that makes the Dart, 200, Cherokee. Good review though!

    • @MichaelAdamsRocks
      @MichaelAdamsRocks  8 років тому +1

      +Michael Alfonso Everything I researched said it was. It may not be the exact platform, but something very similar. Thanks!

  • @damianpasour
    @damianpasour 8 років тому +1

    nice car

  • @jeffreid3341
    @jeffreid3341 5 років тому

    Why can't you get the panoramic sun roof with the second row third seat?

  • @matjaro
    @matjaro 8 років тому +1

    Im considering the hybrid version coming up late this year, just not sure yet on the 50k avg cost, thats a lot for only 30miles of pure e range

  • @lisasmith3485
    @lisasmith3485 8 років тому +2

    How much was the sticker price of the van you featured?

  • @مشعلالعنزي-ن3ض
    @مشعلالعنزي-ن3ض 7 років тому +3

    😍😍😍👍👍

  • @wiibaron
    @wiibaron 8 років тому +1

    The only thing I see 'wrong' in the design is that the vac hose needs a sliding cover over it like the accessory cover. Seems odd to not cover the hose too.

  • @spiddyman0079
    @spiddyman0079 8 років тому

    27 minutes and no theatre coverage. Like is it only HDMI or can you use standard I/O SD jacks.

    • @flamingguy21
      @flamingguy21 8 років тому

      spiddyman007 It seems as if the van he was checking out didn't have theater. It's optional for around $2,985

  • @Aaron-tk7wh
    @Aaron-tk7wh 8 років тому +2

    there's been several complaints are ready for these minivans. About how comfortable they are riding their Transmissions sucks. dreamline still have the same as what they claim they do!

  • @jordanjones1334
    @jordanjones1334 8 років тому

    What do you think a good car is for a first-time car

  • @alexanderharlow298
    @alexanderharlow298 8 років тому

    How's your brothers Grand Prix

  • @toddgabweg
    @toddgabweg 8 років тому

    Looks very nice... too bad I'm stuck with a 2014 Nissan Quest LE...

    • @flamingguy21
      @flamingguy21 8 років тому +1

      Cheer up, that's still a very nice van!

    • @Aaron-tk7wh
      @Aaron-tk7wh 8 років тому

      FlamingGuy21 that has a poor rating crash test side in pack.

    • @flamingguy21
      @flamingguy21 8 років тому

      AARON 2008 No, it was the "small overlap" it does poorly on. Other than that, the other safety ratings are "Good"

  • @B---dw6pz
    @B---dw6pz 8 років тому +2

    It looks like the foreign competitor (cough), I would not drive it across the street.