@@alexcarter2461 They poke and prod and try to get men to think we all believe a man in the woods is the same thing as an aggressive bear. Divide and conquer strategy. The assumption is we are all connected in to the wymyn borg brain. Not this one. No sir!
@alexcarter2461 yeah I kind of had a general dislike towards feminists before. Now I've got fantasies of them being eaten by bears for karma It radicalized me.
@@KV_1615 Well you dont get to choose what man. I see your point but there are so many variables, same thing with the bear, it could be an aggressive bear or not
@@Lazy_lizard.Yea let it happen fr once and then try to convince your subconscious mind that chance of death is better than chance of r**e. You will be shocked by how easily you will choose a man. People fr stupid nowadays, it's good that darwinism is a thing
What a silly conundrum, the bear will eat you alive, you will not escape as they can run upto 45kph, and can climb trees better, and swim better, with a man, it’s a roll of the dice, even pessimistically speaking, will probably help you
Depends. Is the man an outdoor survivalist like he could finish the naked and afraid challenge with ease? What kind of bear? Grizzly? Polar? Sun? Koala? Gummy? What a dumb question.
The difference: Vs a man: -You have a chance commonly the same size as you -0.005% the man is a killer Most mans will not just attack you or do anything Vs a bear: -100% would attack you if he is hungry -If it's not hungry it will attack you eventually -Smallest bears you can find weights 200 kg -even against pandas, herbivorous animals are not docile creatures as the social media make you think Most herbivorous has Maro than enough weapons to kill you and they will Pandas weights 200 kg and you can find plenty of videos of panda attacks Even against the best scenario against a bear you will definitely die While is very unlikely that you die to a man, and if you do die to a man if someone finds out the man will have life imprisonment, or whatever you have in the us in some countries this will be penalized by death
@@Lazy_lizard. Because, even though it almost never happens, it warms my heart any time a female has to actually accept accountability for her poor decisions.
@@mikey92362 a female? but anyways ye thats very true i would choose the man but i see other ladies point bc a man would be able to give you extended torture that a bear would not be able to comprehend. 4 example like that hello kitty murder case
That’s not the question. The QUESTIONS (there are two) are: “Would you rather be alone in the woods with a man, or a bear?” *responses about type of bear, assessing the amount of bear attacks compared to stranger attacks, yada yada* “Ok. Now, would you rather be alone in the woods with a woman or a bear.” *responses no longer require assessments or thought, most choose woman* It’s not the answer, that is the point. It’s the way some people need to do an entire assessment to get to the answer for one question, but not the other.
Incorrect. The question from the video literally is "Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a bear?" This implies a survival situation, which means the answer can also be about which is more useful to survive. What made it viral is that women started assuming they were going to get attacked by whichever they picked.
@@MustardSkaventhe man would rather help the woman than kill her the bear however is an equal opportunity predator and it doesn't matter what type of species of living bear the creature one way or another is going to kill you and eat you and if the Bears feeling extremely needy most likely go to town on you in the other sense if it's crazy enough or on cocaine do not underestimate the madness of being with a bear if the movie cocaine bear has showed me anything I rather stick with a man did that of the terrifying bear
@@MustardSkaven I’m not incorrect. Lmao. That is how it is *supposed* to go. Because it’s not about picking man, or bear, or woman. Even if someone picks man, it’s still about how easy/hard it was to come to those conclusions. And why it may have been easier for one. Edit: How it is supposed to go. Meaning: logically, the choice is man. But the few seconds of thought that are taken to come to that conclusion, versus the no seconds of thought to come to the second conclusion, is what is supposed to be discussed. What were those thoughts. And why did we have them for the man, and not the woman.
Overall, the question is a double-edged sword. It can be hurtful if seen as an attack on all men, but it can also be a springboard for a necessary conversation about safety and creating a more secure world for everyone.
The 750,000 black bears of North America kill less than one person per year on the average, while men ages 18-24 are 167 times more likely to kill someone than a black bear. Tho, do we know if the dude's friendly or we know nothing at all?
I honestly don't understand how you can not trust men specifically but still trust women. Humans can be evil, men, women, and children. Why you'd (not you specifically, "you" as in everyone answering the question with "bear") one of them and not the other two is beyond me.
They clearly have never been in real danger, if you meet a bear in his territory or with cubs, or you break down mentally and start running or doing anything that makes him think you are prey, you are dead. And this is terryfing death.
"Would you rather take a coin toss or die?" Is basically the premises of the question. You chose to die. Don't worry, there are people you can contact to help.
@@kellymccarthy7109 I don't see how you can say that men are guaranteed to be bad with a straight face. Assuming the pool of men that you end up in the forest with is worldwide, there is a 3% chance for that man to be a potential sex offender. I would take that over the chance that the bear I am with is aggressive and dangerous for any reason.
We are assuming the man would be bad, and not helpful.
Yeah this question says more about women than it does about men.
@@MustardSkaven Bingo!
If this question was bid to get men to understand the plight of women, it failed. If anything it's going to cause men to disassociate more.
@@alexcarter2461 They poke and prod and try to get men to think we all believe a man in the woods is the same thing as an aggressive bear. Divide and conquer strategy. The assumption is we are all connected in to the wymyn borg brain. Not this one. No sir!
@alexcarter2461 yeah I kind of had a general dislike towards feminists before. Now I've got fantasies of them being eaten by bears for karma
It radicalized me.
Choose the man and hunt the bears together 🤷♀️
Finally someone with the right answer.
@@KV_1615 Well you dont get to choose what man. I see your point but there are so many variables, same thing with the bear, it could be an aggressive bear or not
Bears dont just kill you they grab you hold you down and chew chunks out of you alive or dead
Edit thank you guys this is the most likes I've gotten
Yh but is that really worse then getting r…
@@Lazy_lizard.Their body is still violated and they are in constant pain as it happens.
@@chocov1233But you just die after. The man might lock you up and use you again and again
@@chocov1233 yh but if you were a girl you would understand that SA is much worse then getting a arm and leg ripped of one by one
@@Lazy_lizard.Yea let it happen fr once and then try to convince your subconscious mind that chance of death is better than chance of r**e. You will be shocked by how easily you will choose a man. People fr stupid nowadays, it's good that darwinism is a thing
What a silly conundrum, the bear will eat you alive, you will not escape as they can run upto 45kph, and can climb trees better, and swim better, with a man, it’s a roll of the dice, even pessimistically speaking, will probably help you
What is 45kph to mph?
@@CornellBrown-g8r roughly like 30 iirc
@@CornellBrown-g8r I would say bicycling down an average slope, or cycle very fast straight forward. Correct me if I am wrong.
@@millennialmindset3624I guess it's about 28 mph.
@@CornellBrown-g8rnah I think bears can run 35-40, mph it's even more scary
This debate makes me loose my faith in humanity
your shitty grammar makes me lose faith in humanity
how loose?
your grammar makes me lose faith in humanity 😅
Depends. Is the man an outdoor survivalist like he could finish the naked and afraid challenge with ease? What kind of bear? Grizzly? Polar? Sun? Koala? Gummy? What a dumb question.
The difference:
Vs a man:
-You have a chance commonly the same size as you
-0.005% the man is a killer
Most mans will not just attack you or do anything
Vs a bear:
-100% would attack you if he is hungry
-If it's not hungry it will attack you eventually
-Smallest bears you can find weights 200 kg
-even against pandas, herbivorous animals are not docile creatures as the social media make you think
Most herbivorous has Maro than enough weapons to kill you and they will
Pandas weights 200 kg and you can find plenty of videos of panda attacks
Even against the best scenario against a bear you will definitely die
While is very unlikely that you die to a man, and if you do die to a man if someone finds out the man will have life imprisonment, or whatever you have in the us in some countries this will be penalized by death
I'd also prefer if they ran into the bear.
Grizzle Grizzle!
Why
@@Lazy_lizard. Because, even though it almost never happens, it warms my heart any time a female has to actually accept accountability for her poor decisions.
@@mikey92362 you just don’t want to except the fact that men are horrible creatures that can do much more then just rip a person apart
wow, your are the reason women chose the bear. you would get joy out of seeing someone get mauled by a bear
@@mikey92362 a female? but anyways ye thats very true i would choose the man but i see other ladies point bc a man would be able to give you extended torture that a bear would not be able to comprehend. 4 example like that hello kitty murder case
That’s not the question.
The QUESTIONS (there are two) are:
“Would you rather be alone in the woods with a man, or a bear?”
*responses about type of bear, assessing the amount of bear attacks compared to stranger attacks, yada yada*
“Ok. Now, would you rather be alone in the woods with a woman or a bear.”
*responses no longer require assessments or thought, most choose woman*
It’s not the answer, that is the point. It’s the way some people need to do an entire assessment to get to the answer for one question, but not the other.
Incorrect. The question from the video literally is "Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a man or a bear?"
This implies a survival situation, which means the answer can also be about which is more useful to survive. What made it viral is that women started assuming they were going to get attacked by whichever they picked.
@@MustardSkaventhe only thing is a man is less likely to kill a woman in the middle of the woods than a bear
@@MustardSkaventhe man would rather help the woman than kill her the bear however is an equal opportunity predator and it doesn't matter what type of species of living bear the creature one way or another is going to kill you and eat you and if the Bears feeling extremely needy most likely go to town on you in the other sense if it's crazy enough or on cocaine do not underestimate the madness of being with a bear if the movie cocaine bear has showed me anything I rather stick with a man did that of the terrifying bear
@@MustardSkaven I’m not incorrect. Lmao. That is how it is *supposed* to go. Because it’s not about picking man, or bear, or woman. Even if someone picks man, it’s still about how easy/hard it was to come to those conclusions. And why it may have been easier for one.
Edit: How it is supposed to go. Meaning: logically, the choice is man. But the few seconds of thought that are taken to come to that conclusion, versus the no seconds of thought to come to the second conclusion, is what is supposed to be discussed. What were those thoughts. And why did we have them for the man, and not the woman.
@@XtycheX You are incorrect, of course. You formulated the wrong question. I quoted the question directly from the original video.
ok i have question wouod u rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a black man?
100% the bear, at least the bear aint going to steal my shit and pistol whip me
@@shuckahoseerazzle8486💀
Someone saw a certain UA-cam short
@@shuckahoseerazzle8486racist
Still bear? 😊
Bears will eat you like you never had a man do
💀💀💀💀💀💀💀
Good so we can weed out the weak ones 🤷🏾♀️
Overall, the question is a double-edged sword. It can be hurtful if seen as an attack on all men, but it can also be a springboard for a necessary conversation about safety and creating a more secure world for everyone.
The 750,000 black bears of North America kill less than one person per year on the average, while men ages 18-24 are 167 times more likely to kill someone than a black bear.
Tho, do we know if the dude's friendly or we know nothing at all?
I assume that is a loaded question! -neither option is regrettable! 😮😮😮😮
-858lb
-6.5 foot long
-34.7 m/h (running)
Can you imagine being this paranoid?
I honestly don't understand how you can not trust men specifically but still trust women. Humans can be evil, men, women, and children. Why you'd (not you specifically, "you" as in everyone answering the question with "bear") one of them and not the other two is beyond me.
They clearly have never been in real danger, if you meet a bear in his territory or with cubs, or you break down mentally and start running or doing anything that makes him think you are prey, you are dead. And this is terryfing death.
Black man or bear
Someone saw a certain UA-cam short
Man to man i could take a bear
would you rather be stuck with a black man or a bear
Someone saw a certain UA-cam short
Would you rather be stuck in a forest with a bear or a black man
Someone saw a certain UA-cam short
how does that change the topic
@@elliot_yessir EXACTLY
I choose bear because i could eat it
Is it because you're a man???
Fym you could eat it, you aint beating a fucking bear who you think you is nga😭
You'd have to find a way for it to die first unless you could eat it alive.
-858lb
-6.5 foot long
-34.7 m/h (running)
Yeah a bear because a man just ganna bite your head off😊 .
you switched them around
Then you ask what if it was a black man
Someone saw a certain UA-cam short
Bear
That's just outrageous
"Would you rather take a coin toss or die?" Is basically the premises of the question. You chose to die. Don't worry, there are people you can contact to help.
@@thompsonwilliams5957 The bears the coin toss. Black bear i'm good, brown I die. Mans guaranteed bad things lmao.
@@kellymccarthy7109 I don't see how you can say that men are guaranteed to be bad with a straight face. Assuming the pool of men that you end up in the forest with is worldwide, there is a 3% chance for that man to be a potential sex offender. I would take that over the chance that the bear I am with is aggressive and dangerous for any reason.
@@kellymccarthy7109would you rather be eaten alive by a bear or have a coin toss where the odds are heavily stacked for you
Me too we the bears 😅
-858lb
-6.5 foot long
-34.7 m/h (running)