Exactly, the most important thing in a democracy is how strong and competent is opposition, without a strong opposition the democracy will be in danger.
So asashmed for ppl of Kendrapada to not vote for this highly educated, intelligent, seasoned politician Jay Panda against a film star Anubhav Mahanty who doesn't have any experience in politics!!!
@@abhishekswarup5352 the guy who calls other media house as godi media does most biased debates .... As those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
Let me start by saying that I think Mr Tharoor should probably be heading the Congress party. But, I was amazed by how bias the host was. She very smartly at the start of the interview introduces Jay as representing the BJP (1.10) and somehow Mr Tharoor is an apolitical individual(3.08). Give me a break. She then further starts to defend Mr Tharoor when Mr Jay makes a direct comment about Mr Tharoor (7.30 and 7:49). She was clear in whom she was supporting and far from being fair.
How tf is this lady a good moderator? She was literally arguing against Shashi Tharoor and making opposition points Do you know what a moderator is supposed to do? They are meant to be impartial and not throw their weight on one side or another She is a horrible moderator
He was a part of BJD, Odisha previously. He recently joined BJP before 2019 elections due to many reasons. But yes, he is a very very good orator as well as a sensible and a politician with a decent record.
Me neither! His twitter bio says he's an "avid nonfiction reader". Which is also great! Even better than "non avid fiction reader" which is what I was expecting considering most people's twitter handle :D At first I feared this was going to be another shouting match. But it was well moderated and the guests were very civil.
i belong to odisha and i can safely say that he was getting a lot popular in the state and many of us thought he's next in line to be CM after naveen patnaik. but for some reason there was dispute between them and naveen expelled him.
It rarely happens when someone matches or overpower verbal skills and factual details of shashi tharoor.. Kudos to Jay Pandaji.. Why is he out of government..? Bring him to the cabinet..
Yes. It's primarily because Shashi had a low point just because of party line. Panda maintained an upper hand in overall debate and is very articulate but in terms of pure articulation and eloquence, even in this debate, Shashi is on a different level. Just see the tone and flow how they match up with the sentiments of his words.
I agree with verbal skills but not factual details. He is a good twister of words to suit his argument, though they sound factual they are not good for the country as a whole but makes him look like a intellectual. No wonder he has been dodging the bullet on his court case for a long time. You must listen to the journalist friend Nalini Singh of his then wife Sunanda Pushkar.
The moment Mr. Tharoor said Muslim league in Kerala is a secular party, country should understand what is the definition of secularism in India according to Indian Congress.
bedhav108 well they are moderate and secular when compared to the jihadis and ISIS. All he was saying that if we ridicule them and remove them, we will have a disaster
Ravish Kumar doesn't call even those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
Very nice debate with humility! This raises standard of debate in India. Really liked both intellectuals throwing light on the matter. Appreciate NDTV!
This is how a debate should be..I really hope Arnab Goswami ( @republicTV ) watch this and learn how moderation is done. Jay Panda nailed it. Shashi Tharoor a good listener and do hold a view of better Kashmir.
Unlike Ravish debates, .... those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
Have you sense ? If yes think, why Pakistan Occupied Kashmir is free? Why Pakistan never claimed Kashmir? Why there is no curfew in Pok ? Why People are losing their lives in Iok ? Why there are Rape cases by Indian army? Why there is access for international media? If you are human you can understand.
@@balochsb3356 Because the demography of that place is already changed from 77% Shias in 1941 to 39% shias now + there are people in pok protesting against pakistan and brutality of pakistani army in pok, khaibar pakhtun, karachi, baloochistan can't be denied.
@@deeptisinghal8034 Yes... and they clubbed all of us poor, illiterate, uncouth indians... into one common cluster and raised our lowest common character to their supposedly very highly sophisticated character which demanded that we give 1st right to our land, money, resources, temples, temple money etc etc to somebody who already got a major part of our rich land with the great option to go if they wanted or stay if they wanted...what a way for 2 people to decide the destiny of a billion people...great visionaries!
Nehru was completely biased towards Shaik Abdulla. Article 370 was included just because Nehru's love for Abdulla was much more than his love for this Nation.
I know Jay Panda personally.. He is a brilliant man with a brilliant mind... He was in BJD party in Odisha back then but now he became Vice President of BJP.. After he became Vice President of BJP my uncle got the seat for BJP state president of Odisha.. He is very humble person.. But one thing I must say most of the state based political parties are corrupted then the big central level parties...
@@Himanshu.Harleyx440 well definitely Congress has many idiot spokesman, but if u r calling this Congress representative an IDIOT, then u must read something about his earlier diplomatic work
@Firehorse rb Sambit Patra wouldn't be able to change his style regardless of whether the person with the opposing view is a 12 year old child, an 80 year old senior, a soft spoken ambassador, a parrot, a computer or a stone. He is a natural spin-doctor who on a stormy day under a heavy deluge of rain will argue that that it is not raining. It is like he can't open his mouth without lying.
Sonia should be given credit for it though I do not understand why Shashi Tharoor is a favorite of NDTV. Or is there nobody else in CONgress worth calling ?
The reason Rahul Gandhi and Soniaji do not speak in the Lok Sabha the debate of Art 370 and 35A is that neither of them knows how to speak. A few months back Rahul was shouting all over India that he just needs 15 minutes in parliament to speak while the fact is that then as well as now he is not capable of speaking in parliament. The only reason these two people are even in politics is due to their being in Nehru dynasty and this is the reason for the current situation of Congress party, which is now leaderless and before this with an incompetent leader.
Superb, for the first time have I seen a nice respectfully conducted debate, with both debaters ending with a common and shared hope for an improved India. Just wonderful!
Very sensible and valid conversation..... people who are really interested in learning, developing mind and brain, improving language etc should watch these conversations rather than the noisy, rude and biased debates on other channels....
Yes. It was he who walked the tight rope. Good people always are made to put themselves in the defensive by people like Shashi Tharoor. Sonia is the only anchor worthy to be called one in NDTV.
@@Iamlatha but shashi tharoor was also making good arguments. There is a point about the means having to be more important than the end... of course we can argue but we will have to understand this event holistically. BY the way i am a bhaklth.
@@jayap3557, If the means adapted to insert the Article was in the sly in a crooked manner, the same can be applied to remove it as well. The dice game in Mahabharatha was won by full of cheating by Shakuni. Hence the war won by Pandavas by inequitable means is justified because the wrong doers did not deserve a war by just & fair means. As you sow, so you reap.
@ytub yt, Again, outcome is not in our hands. The intention is what is important. Irrespective of the outcome, they have taken the right precautions & the right steps. Baaki sab bullshit hai. If the Kashmiris want to forgo this golden opportunity & stab on their own legs, it is their fate. Nobody can help them.
A perfect debate! And it was expected since both the representatives are more learned and polished. But above that it was about anchor who matched their shrewdness and most importantly she was UNBIASED unlike her other collegues.
Very nice debate. Good work by anchor. I respect Shashi Tharoor ji even when his views are bit different from mine. He is a really skilled and patient speaker and I am proud of him. Congress need these kind of people in top leadership instead of Gandhi family. They are themselves destroying the opposition by keeping everything in the control of Gandhi Family, no one else is responsible.
Amazing debate. Jay Panda sir seemed to be the more reasonable one. Tharoor Sir is short sighted, he seems to give greater importance to the process rather than outcome; which isn't a bad thing in itself, but sometimes we have to play the devil for the greater good.
@@027champ i can't really understand whats the big deal about his english is , fact is english is just a language , which has just one important function that is communication , alot of times he fails to communicate with his audience so who is at the disadvantage the speaker or his audience
Sometimes things are executed in national interest in a manner which might appear harsh. In a longer term this is a major paradigm policy shift of India. Give the present government all the support.
Audience matters. Most of us like to see heated debates because it gives a sense that the topic is very sensitive and that the implications will be huge. If those news channels were polite and formal in their approach most of us will not buy that news and change the channel. Just by the number of views of this video, given the historic moment, its pretty clear for what i said.
Somebody teach Mr Goswami....this z hw a debate shud b done...👍....I support the revokation of article 370...✌️....but I can't stand when news channel s act like Ekta Kapoor's Daily soap....😂🤣
Arnab Goswami's debates may not be idealistic but the masks of the debaters are fantastically scratched.Their emotions just come out naturally amidst the chaos.
@@anshumandhal this guy who calls other media house as godi media does most biased debates .... As those BJP supporting panelists present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
The anchor is very balanced, fair, and asked pointed questions to both sides. Unlike Nidhi Rajdhan, she clearly has her bias/side and often get carried away with emotions losing sight of the dialogue.
Let me start by saying that I think Mr Tharoor should probably be heading the Congress party. But, I was amazed by how bias the host was. She very smartly at the start of the interview introduces Jay as representing the BJP (1.10) and somehow Mr Tharoor is an apolitical individual(3.08). Give me a break. She then further starts to defend Mr Tharoor when Mr Jay makes a direct comment about Mr Tharoor (7.30 and 7:49). She was clear in whom she was supporting and far from being fair.
Veer Ganesh Thank you for pointing that out! I’m used to seeing Barkha Dutt, Nidhi Rajdhan, Ravish Kumar having very clear bias against the government or individual politicians. I still believe she is far better than the anchors I mentioned.
I don't see that the self-proclaimed "integral" people (Tharoor, mainly) are more integral than the rest of us - on the other hand, J&K is indeed an integral part of India
This is the way a debate should progress. Both politicians and the anchor were polite, humble. Both politicians paid good attention to each other's point and tried to be discreet about there reply. There was no shouting no bad mouthing about any previous politician, no shifting of blame by Jay Panda ( which a fresh thing by BJP), Tharoor accepting that situation in kashmir was never good even under their rule, Tharoor even accepting article 370 was obstructing in many ways, esp that different flag, 6 year plan. This debate just shows how a debate should be because in the end we all want best for India. Jay Panda you are the first BJP politician, listening to whom was not about feeding to irrational jingoistic hyper climate. You did extremely well, esp your humbleness and politeness & that "lets not reexamine history, what nehru did, what sardar patel did" just increased the respect of your argument!! . Tharoor was well under his limits as a cultured and rational man & that "lack of accomodating different opinion is what BJP lack" was bang to the point, loved the way you walked that tight rope of aggreeing and dis agreeing. It was more like a debate between two well spoken, well read friends who don't agree with each other, amazing! The sharing of thoughts, without any drama is DEBATE. Thank you NDTV for this marvel piece.
All kashmiri v people living around India youths studying all-over India getting reservation having jobs established business buying properties Delhi bengaluru mumbai and they would not even allow hindu valmikis any job in kashmir. But rohingyas porkistan are brothers. This is being communal.
@Shabbir Hossain This is actually a laughable argument. Have you forgotten that those Muslim rulers came as invaders from Afghanistan and Mongolia. Or Have you forgotten about the atrocities that the Pakistani army committed on it's own citizens of East Pakistan, or who came to the aid of Bangladesh for its liberation, for that matter? The status of minorities in Bangladesh and Pakistan is well known( in India it is deteriorating, but in India they have their representation and constitutional rights- something not found in Bangladesh or Pakistan). So your arguments are all devoid of facts.
Less than 10% Kashmiris want to secede from India. For the overwhelming number of Kashmiris, joining Pakistan is infinitely worse than a situation where J&K is under perpetual curfew under an Indian administration. Its good that the Government has abrogated Article 370 keeping the interest of the majority of Kashmiris uppermost in mind.
One of the most awesome and dignified debate. Hats off to Mr. Jay Panda for the way he answered the questions of Mr. Tharoor. Mr. Tharoor appeared to be naive when he compared Indira Gandhi's imposition of emergency to the lock down presently in the valley. And also Mr. Tharoor at some places was not agreeing to Mr. Panda simply because his masters (Tharoor's) may take offence.On the whole Mr. Jay Panda certainly is a notch higher than Mr. Tharoor. All the other debaters must watch this and learn a few good lessons.
Minorities around country feeling victimised is really unfortunate.... This is not targeted towards community/demography.....this is fundamental step to fix the boundary. When nation is born fundamental and foremost is sovereignty. People shud know which side of border they belong, ambuity gives fodder to incite extremism.... and our neighbor is professional in tat field..... It seems thr parliament runs on that issue.
It has been done to make majority population happy..it is bjps majority appeasement and vote bank politics..cant use develolment excuse to do what they did..person responsible for gujarat is rewarded with being pm , what else can be expected
Mazhar Syed It’s more so than that. It’s systemized and calculated expansion by a growing economy and population for resources. Since China is preoccupied, they stuck while the iron is hot
@UCgraMWPG36oZ1yKfPFnj6EQ i understand ur point...but unfortunately boundry has been fixed excluding kashmir..for kashmiris that part is IOK now, we lost them forever..having just military there doesnt help..370 was never a hinderance, it was an assurance provided by GOI which has not been honoured and they feel cheated..let curfew go off and very soon u will see the reality..then 'all is well' in kashmir staged shoots propogated by paid media will be exposed..i hope i am proved wrong, but i know i will not go wrong on this..u can not forcefully enter someones home telling them we know what is good for u and u dont know.
a truly civilized debate...kudos! both of you....jay panda never showcased any unnecessary aggressiveness as showcased by his contemporaries in BJP..the eloquence of shashi tharoor is commendable once again
@@inderdhaliwaal yes and article 370 is a black spot in our constitution . It's shame on us that for 70 years we r unaware of the plight of dalits and 1947 migrant of west pakistan in kashmir . Article 370 is against fundamental right article 14 (equality before law ) . Abrogation of trash(article 370) is a welcoming step ...
@@Kamallohani10 sir, article 370 wasn't a grant by government of India to Kashmir ,rather was treaty and a promise. Demolishing the 370 isn't the one I'm against of , I'm against in the spirit it was demolished, by not taking local people in confidence , by blacking out the former state and putting the representative leaders under arrest.
@@anunayasingh3621 democracy says take the people in confidence, take the assembly in confidence but rather doing that , what the government did has killed the idea of noble democracy.
Repealing Article 370 will benefit Modi's vote share in the upcoming state elections. I dare someone to come up with even a single genuine benefit to anyone else.
There you go. Now please, I'd like to hear how you think these do not benefit the people of Kashmir. The repeal of article 370 will help them flourish in the coming years and unify our country in a way that wasn't possible with 370 in place.
kashmir don't represent whole j&k views. Kashmiris made hostage to jammu and ladakh people and discrimated them Because it was always ruled by kashmiri based parties (pdp, NC). Kashmir gets 5% of budget allocated to states for 1% of population. Government of India spent 91000 rupees on single Kashmiri person per head annually as opposed to 4000 rupees per head for a person living in Uttar Pradesh. Still they kill our jawans and put stones on our jawans. There are people who migrated from Pakistan 70 years ago but they never get voting rights or can do government jobs in j&k. There are sc balmiki community who don't get political and voting rights. 370 was pure discriminatory. This is the reason why kashmiri people are against the removal of the special status.
A very meaningful dialogue, so many inevitable allegations raised by mr. tharoor and the anchor which was well defended by the opposite panelist. And yes national interest should always come first👍
Very healthy and knowledgeable debate..Jay panda is the spokesperson that BJP needs.Same is applicable for Congress also in Sashi Tharoor. He should be allowed a more larger playing field in Congress
Very nice debate...truly impressed with all parties including the anchor...very mature, to the point, good orators and a major credit to the anchor. Keep it up!!!
After revocation of Artical 370 and 35A the essence of democracy and constitution has improved and has taken more purified version instead of degrading.
@dearjohnny you should answer me in a just way . when gujrath riots happened hindus attacked muslims with courage because gujrath was hindu majority state. similarly jummu kashmir is a muslim majority state , those who are responsible for gujrathi riots take an action to support a minority religion in jammu and kashmir do the majority religion support it i don't think any majority religion would support an act especially muslims. bjp had leaped before looking. this was done to accumulate pro hindu votes in up coming assembly election , but this decision has deadly implication on majority people of kashmir . majority sentiments will get hurt and shall turn to fighting options
@dearjohnny Parliament doesn't need the consent of the concerned state legislature to bifurcate but yes the President should put any such proposal to divide the state before the state legislature to elicit their opinion on it within a timeframe but such an opinion is not binding on the Parliament. Andhra Pradesh legislature got such a proposal while J and K didn't because it has dissolved.
Mr Sasi Tharoor, remember what your party did in Andhra Pradesh in 2014. You do not have the right to talk on this issue. Yours is anti National party. India first get rid of khangress
I'm sure even Tharoor would be elated by the decision of the GOI, he's just harping the ✋line. This is his most uneloquent debate and he knows why. Also big shout out to Jay to Articulating the GOI's stand without mincing words.
Shashi is a great champion of democracy and fabulous in debate. But I also feel he's a paper-tiger who talks a lot but I haven't seen him do anything extraordinary on a macro scale except belt out amazing speeches in the domestic and international arena.
I understand completely why you would feel that way with the way how matters are run/analyzed when it comes to the centre. It's mostly got to do with Congress not being a stable/decent opposition and him being it's spokesperson. Most often that situation makes it look like it's all talk and no action. However, he has done well as a representative of Thiruvananthapuram, the constituency of which he is the MP for three consecutive terms. Especially during the current crisis of Covid19
JAY excellent job! Let's look at the involuntary response from Shashi Taroor, nodding his head in agreement with JAY. Why do you want to go in person to see if J&K is returning to normal, when all you did during your era was just joining hands with separatists.
Thanks NDTV. This is the kind of dialogue and discussion we need. And not shouting and yelling. And thanks unlike Raveesh’s show the mediator is not biased.
vivek India is the occupying power in Kashmir it was the job of India military to win the hearts and minds of the Kashmiree people and they have not been able to they have been doing what other occupying powers have been doing murdering Kashmiree raping there daughters and taking there land and then of course when you are occupying power you will get stone throwing isreal has done the same thing they get stone throwing as well and the isreali forces claim they are fighting terrorists when they are killing civilians just like isreali will never win this nor will the Indian military will win learn from history did you except the British ruling your country the British considered Indians as terrorists so why did Indians do shelf determination why didn’t they not except British rule
@@NaseerAhmed-sc5bl inidan miliitary is only to protect india from outsiders. Pleasing people is local govt's job which they didn't do for obvious reasons.
This is the kind of debate which youths of India wants to see! I learnt many things from this debate, really thankful and blessed to see such leaders leading the Nation!
Mr Tharoor....this is what the majority of India wanted.....and the gov is just doing what the majority wanted..... so spirit and principally and morally... I think all are well covered....
Jay, you are too good. I agree with you that it was not that the BJP did not want to take the opposition with them on this issue, but it was the reluctance of the opposition parties to go with the BJP. It should be remembered that BJP appealed to the opposition more than once during the debate in the parliament to be one with them atleast on this issue. Shashi, stop making false allegations just because you have to defend congress. This will not go well with the people who admire you.
Rare and Refreshing to see a Gentleman BJP speaker who could actively debate the likes of Mr. Tharoor with Intelligence, Dignity and Respect. Mr Tharoor of course was in his elements and does what he does best. He was equally respectable to Mr. Panda. Great Respect for Mr. Tharoor. He should be the next Face of Congress... The Anchor too was very knowledgeable and balanced and conducted the debate in a respectable manner...
What a meaningful Debate by best representatives from both Parties . Hats off to Shashi Ji & Jay Ji ... I think the way 370 has been revoked , is the best possible way to do it . All have been trying since ages but no result , YES this was well planned because using 370 to revoke 370 is the best legal procedure which was followed . I think we should give couple of more years on this , we have already seen Pakistan doing great jobs in PoK , they are living well below poverty line and they don’t have half the rights which A normal Pakistan citizen have . Actually Pakistan did this to PoK in 1970 , and no one took it to anywhere , because India knew that this is going to be in benefit of PoK but it went absolutely adverse . I heared lately , that Mukesh Ambani is committed to invest few billions in Kashmir for its development , I must say that everyone will be in sync on this that People will grow if they have money rolling in their pockets which is the sign of a growing economy , and economy will grow by investment only . I don’t have any doubt that INdian industrialist will pour atleast USD 100 billion ( tentative ) to improve Kashmir’s economy which will directly add on to INdian Economy and to their own Wealth. USD 100 Billion for 12.5 million people only , if I get the calculation than a share of more than 5.5 lac INR per citizen , it means a lot . It won’t come to their pockets but will roll in Market and people will Have more Jobs , safe career , safe & inspiring living .
THANK YOU. I wish this kind of debate become mainstream, instead of fanatics shouting and saying provoking statements. This kind of quality debate should be the benchmark for news channels.
It's a good debate. However, Shahi Tharoor did get better chance to put his point. Jay panda didn't interrupt Shashi however Shashi did interrupt Jay at multiple occasions... Overall all it is a good debate...
These gentlemen make sure that democracy does not fade away in India. It’s true that abrogation of article 370 has not been done in the proper democratic manner because you cannot simply arrest mainstream leaders from Kashmir and break an important bridge without their consent.
That's how it's done. Mutual respect between both parties, no heckling, no screaming. Anchor being the moderator and most importantly it is informative for the viewers.
why doesn't shashi tharoor become the president of congress, I think more than anything we need a better opposition.
Congress Party is a stooge party. It is an undemocratic dynasty.
Good people deserve good things at good time but nobody knows when is the good time.... still it will come.
Exactly, the most important thing in a democracy is how strong and competent is opposition, without a strong opposition the democracy will be in danger.
He is well versed in english but leadership is another thing
He is currently being investigated for the murder of his wife. That is a big disqualifier.
Refreshed seeing someone from BJP being cordial, would like to see Jay Panda in other debates !
It applies to all politicians irrespective of country and parties...
I'm not used to this kind of peaceful debate . My B.P. is getting lower and lower I need to watch aajtak or republic to get stable.
Go to kashmir rather
Lol
🙏🙏🙏🙏
This comment made my day. Btw I too missed sambit Patras "maulanaaa, bol Bharat Mata ki jai"
Hahaha. Lol... Two very knowledgeable and eloquent debaters and an unbiased host. Certainly a different genre of newsroom debate.
So asashmed for ppl of Kendrapada to not vote for this highly educated, intelligent, seasoned politician Jay Panda against a film star Anubhav Mahanty who doesn't have any experience in politics!!!
he has experience in his name (anubhav) . perhaps that was misleading
@@halaayudha Lol gud one!!!
@@halaayudha haha savage
I agree with u
People votes a particular party all the time in Odisha.. irrespective of the person contesting...that norm should be changed first..
Ohh what a beautiful organized debate it was unlike other debate overlapping each other.. Loved it..
I feel the same
I’m from Pakistan and this a very good debate
Same thought brother.
excellent debate, it shows people can put forward opposing thoughts with decency
@ndtv finally a good debate between two good representatives....keep on doing the good work
Finally ? NDTV always did such good debates . You must be watching godi media before.
@@abhishekswarup5352 was watching rstv debates before....you should watch them, maybe you will learn about standard of debates...
@@abhishekswarup5352 the guy who calls other media house as godi media does most biased debates .... As those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
@@tanmaysingh6536 totally agree the level is top notch
@@shreevatsarao3260 Ravish mostly are having rubbish programs....undeniable.
I loved the way the anchor handled the full debate. Owe you lady!
totally agree
Vardeep Grover She was very biased towards Shasi Tharoor
Let me start by saying that I think Mr Tharoor should probably be heading the Congress party. But, I was amazed by how bias the host was. She very smartly at the start of the interview introduces Jay as representing the BJP (1.10) and somehow Mr Tharoor is an apolitical individual(3.08). Give me a break. She then further starts to defend Mr Tharoor when Mr Jay makes a direct comment about Mr Tharoor (7.30 and 7:49). She was clear in whom she was supporting and far from being fair.
How tf is this lady a good moderator? She was literally arguing against Shashi Tharoor and making opposition points
Do you know what a moderator is supposed to do? They are meant to be impartial and not throw their weight on one side or another
She is a horrible moderator
This is bast Anchor i haver watched she great
I haven't seen Jay panda before.. He is awesome👏✊👍
He was a part of BJD, Odisha previously. He recently joined BJP before 2019 elections due to many reasons.
But yes, he is a very very good orator as well as a sensible and a politician with a decent record.
He was BJD leader and there on TV for long time.
Me neither!
His twitter bio says he's an "avid nonfiction reader".
Which is also great!
Even better than "non avid fiction reader" which is what I was expecting considering most people's twitter handle :D
At first I feared this was going to be another shouting match. But it was well moderated and the guests were very civil.
i belong to odisha and i can safely say that he was getting a lot popular in the state and many of us thought he's next in line to be CM after naveen patnaik. but for some reason there was dispute between them and naveen expelled him.
It rarely happens when someone matches or overpower verbal skills and factual details of shashi tharoor..
Kudos to Jay Pandaji..
Why is he out of government..?
Bring him to the cabinet..
Yes. It's primarily because Shashi had a low point just because of party line. Panda maintained an upper hand in overall debate and is very articulate but in terms of pure articulation and eloquence, even in this debate, Shashi is on a different level. Just see the tone and flow how they match up with the sentiments of his words.
I agree with verbal skills but not factual details. He is a good twister of words to suit his argument, though they sound factual they are not good for the country as a whole but makes him look like a intellectual. No wonder he has been dodging the bullet on his court case for a long time. You must listen to the journalist friend Nalini Singh of his then wife Sunanda Pushkar.
Abe election haar ga
The moment Mr. Tharoor said Muslim league in Kerala is a secular party, country should understand what is the definition of secularism in India according to Indian Congress.
bedhav108 well they are moderate and secular when compared to the jihadis and ISIS. All he was saying that if we ridicule them and remove them, we will have a disaster
Secular means neutral towards religion. It does not a person or a group is secular or not. But the government should be neutral towards religion.
@@gagansi406 So, its relative. No that they are secular.
@@whythiskolaveridi1883 you want to create muslim ghettos in tamil nadu as well like kashmir don't ya?
@@Dharmicaction No we need educated integrated Muslims, In TN Agaraharam ghettos are also extinct.
Jay panda is one of the most eloquent and well spoken person bjp would ever have ... Kudos ...
Kindlyy show this to Arnab goswami at once 😂😂
Go to pakistan and never return
@@chandsoren5797 go to mars and never return
Well said !
Ravish Kumar doesn't call even those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
@@shreevatsarao3260 dummy BJP Stop sending there people in his show after stupid Patra get kicked out.
This is how a healthy debate looks like.Good ethics , great respect to each other and the anchor is not biased at all.👏
Loved the debate. Love you, Jay Panda. A sensible and articulate debater. Very impressive.
Very nice debate with humility!
This raises standard of debate in India.
Really liked both intellectuals throwing light on the matter.
Appreciate NDTV!
Panda is as much an intellectual as Yogi Adityanath is an intellectual. He hasn’t even published a book, he’s a career politician
For ages I am witnessing a good debate. If Rajdeep was there for sure he would have messed it up by putting words and ideas in their mouth😐
What about Srinivasan Jain, Sara Jacob, Gargi Rawat, Nidhi ? All are equally biased & irritating.
This is how a debate should be..I really hope Arnab Goswami ( @republicTV ) watch this and learn how moderation is done.
Jay Panda nailed it.
Shashi Tharoor a good listener and do hold a view of better Kashmir.
This all has nothing to do with Indian government or pakistan,All is scripted by U S .we are all dancing to their tunes,Just think
The whole of the earth and heavens are ours we created borders for goodness , betterness not to divide
This is how debate is done.
Unlike Ravish debates, .... those BJP supporting panelists are present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
@@shreevatsarao3260 Do you know about Zee News and Republic TV? Ever heard of the ever baised Arnab? Nonsense that is.
Have you sense ? If yes think, why Pakistan Occupied Kashmir is free? Why Pakistan never claimed Kashmir? Why there is no curfew in Pok ? Why People are losing their lives in Iok ? Why there are Rape cases by Indian army? Why there is access for international media? If you are human you can understand.
@@aaithubarla
Man Arnab calls opposition to scold not for debate😜😜
@@balochsb3356 Because the demography of that place is already changed from 77% Shias in 1941 to 39% shias now + there are people in pok protesting against pakistan and brutality of pakistani army in pok, khaibar pakhtun, karachi, baloochistan can't be denied.
I was already a big fan of shashi tharoor. Now Jay panda is also in the list.
That’s stupid, Panda is not analogous to Shashi just because he has a hold of the English language
Very very nice Debate..
Important thing is "it is without any bias"..
And ofcourse with out any SHOR-SHARABA. (Noise)
.
.
.
Thank you NDTV..
Noise is replaced by sophistry. Tharoor is his own form of noise to me.
We want more leaders like Jay panda at Central level. And wishing he will be given a good ministry in future
So who did Nehru ask for permission when the President made 370?
Vallabhai Patel and aiyangar
Jinnah ..lol
Actually Nehru and Gandhis think that they are above everyone and they don't need to ask anyone
@@deeptisinghal8034 Yes... and they clubbed all of us poor, illiterate, uncouth indians... into one common cluster and raised our lowest common character to their supposedly very highly sophisticated character which demanded that we give 1st right to our land, money, resources, temples, temple money etc etc to somebody who already got a major part of our rich land with the great option to go if they wanted or stay if they wanted...what a way for 2 people to decide the destiny of a billion people...great visionaries!
Nehru was completely biased towards Shaik Abdulla. Article 370 was included just because Nehru's love for Abdulla was much more than his love for this Nation.
First time that i saw such a logical person representing BJP😂😂
I know Jay Panda personally.. He is a brilliant man with a brilliant mind... He was in BJD party in Odisha back then but now he became Vice President of BJP.. After he became Vice President of BJP my uncle got the seat for BJP state president of Odisha.. He is very humble person.. But one thing I must say most of the state based political parties are corrupted then the big central level parties...
But Congress is still represented by an idiot isn't it
Mitroooooo
@@Himanshu.Harleyx440 well definitely Congress has many idiot spokesman, but if u r calling this Congress representative an IDIOT, then u must read something about his earlier diplomatic work
@@sofiyanshaikh1162 and you didn't get what I said. I was referring to owl gandhi. Plz dear stop criticizing someone just for religious stands
Good Debate ,we need debates like this.
Difference Between Sambit Patra And Jay Panda.. Sky and earth
@Firehorse rb Sambit Patra wouldn't be able to change his style regardless of whether the person with the opposing view is a 12 year old child, an 80 year old senior, a soft spoken ambassador, a parrot, a computer or a stone. He is a natural spin-doctor who on a stormy day under a heavy deluge of rain will argue that that it is not raining. It is like he can't open his mouth without lying.
samit patra is cousin of arnab goswamy
When replying to people like Pakistani Peerzada who says Kashmiris should behead any Indian who enters it, you need people like Patra.
@@sreekr and sir ravish can?
apparently, both are from same state :) :)
Woww..amazing..this is called truley a debate...there is no...dog barking sound..as another channels do...
I have to turn down volume on those ones and for this I had to turn up :P
Sonia should be given credit for it though I do not understand why Shashi Tharoor is a favorite of NDTV. Or is there nobody else in CONgress worth calling ?
@@Iamlatha Rest are papPOO bhakts. NDTV wants bhakts only, but Tharoor is not as much a bhakt as the rest.
yea, Civilized citizens still exist, fortunately. Unfortunately they don't represent the majority.
Words don't matter. Jay is a politician. His eyes betrayed him.
Jay panda is a great leader, first-time India is able to see him because of BJP I think.
Why did not Rahul Gandhi and Soniaji not speak in the Lok Sabha on the debate of Art 370 and 35A.??? Why? Ask that from both of them
Cause they do no what to talk all mistakes and a tumer in Indias head is injected by his grand papa
Becoz they don't want to show their real face
The reason Rahul Gandhi and Soniaji do not speak in the Lok Sabha the debate of Art 370 and 35A is that neither of them knows how to speak. A few months back Rahul was shouting all over India that he just needs 15 minutes in parliament to speak while the fact is that then as well as now he is not capable of speaking in parliament. The only reason these two people are even in politics is due to their being in Nehru dynasty and this is the reason for the current situation of Congress party, which is now leaderless and before this with an incompetent leader.
Superb, for the first time have I seen a nice respectfully conducted debate, with both debaters ending with a common and shared hope for an improved India.
Just wonderful!
Very sensible and valid conversation..... people who are really interested in learning, developing mind and brain, improving language etc should watch these conversations rather than the noisy, rude and biased debates on other channels....
best debate I have seen between BJP and Cong... I wish we had more people like them in parliament
Jay was excellent in the debate
Yes. It was he who walked the tight rope. Good people always are made to put themselves in the defensive by people like Shashi Tharoor. Sonia is the only anchor worthy to be called one in NDTV.
@@Iamlatha but shashi tharoor was also making good arguments. There is a point about the means having to be more important than the end... of course we can argue but we will have to understand this event holistically. BY the way i am a bhaklth.
@@jayap3557, If the means adapted to insert the Article was in the sly in a crooked manner, the same can be applied to remove it as well. The dice game in Mahabharatha was won by full of cheating by Shakuni. Hence the war won by Pandavas by inequitable means is justified because the wrong doers did not deserve a war by just & fair means. As you sow, so you reap.
@ytub yt, Again, outcome is not in our hands. The intention is what is important. Irrespective of the outcome, they have taken the right precautions & the right steps. Baaki sab bullshit hai. If the Kashmiris want to forgo this golden opportunity & stab on their own legs, it is their fate. Nobody can help them.
Excellent baijayant panda Ji... Respect you.
For the first time I felt Sashi Tharoor was on the backfoot. Amazing Debate.
Guys like these two give hope for decent future politics
A perfect debate! And it was expected since both the representatives are more learned and polished. But above that it was about anchor who matched their shrewdness and most importantly she was UNBIASED unlike her other collegues.
Very nice debate. Good work by anchor. I respect Shashi Tharoor ji even when his views are bit different from mine. He is a really skilled and patient speaker and I am proud of him. Congress need these kind of people in top leadership instead of Gandhi family. They are themselves destroying the opposition by keeping everything in the control of Gandhi Family, no one else is responsible.
Very well said. You pointed out the core problem of Congress. We need a stable government and a stable opposition.
@@v1kh58 yet *sonia gandhi* is what we get
Amazing debate. Jay Panda sir seemed to be the more reasonable one. Tharoor Sir is short sighted, he seems to give greater importance to the process rather than outcome; which isn't a bad thing in itself, but sometimes we have to play the devil for the greater good.
Shashi can debate both ways. He is backing his party . He has no belief but position .
Well said.
Well said
Finally we found someone with equal English capabilities, who can match with Shashi sir 😂😂
Equal would be overstatement. Shashi’s eloquence is on different level. No disrespect intended to other speaker.
@@027champ I agree. Sanjay was very articulate. But Shashi has the tone and flow with better structured sentences. It's actually a different level.
@@027champ i can't really understand whats the big deal about his english is , fact is english is just a language , which has just one important function that is communication , alot of times he fails to communicate with his audience so who is at the disadvantage the speaker or his audience
Ur showcasing the slave mentality which our ex ruler planned to leave India to a d we are still dancing to their tunes.
@@027champ It doesn't really matter here though, in this context. I appreciate both of these two politicians. We need more members like them.
I'm agree with jai panda's all logics
Jay Panda’s smirk when Tharoor mentions RaGa being referred to as pappu, says a lot 😃
😁
People now have stopped using papu name for kids now
Sometimes things are executed in national interest in a manner which might appear harsh. In a longer term this is a major paradigm policy shift of India. Give the present government all the support.
Nice debate. Credit goes to both of them and anchor.
All the noise channels needs to learn how to conduct a debate. Debate like this one.
Audience matters. Most of us like to see heated debates because it gives a sense that the topic is very sensitive and that the implications will be huge. If those news channels were polite and formal in their approach most of us will not buy that news and change the channel. Just by the number of views of this video, given the historic moment, its pretty clear for what i said.
This is what we needed from NDTV....you were always against bjp ...now we are watching an unbiased debate.....
Somebody teach Mr Goswami....this z hw a debate shud b done...👍....I support the revokation of article 370...✌️....but I can't stand when news channel s act like Ekta Kapoor's Daily soap....😂🤣
Right👍👍
Similarly Ravish should learn calling opposite point of view in debates
Arnab Goswami's debates may not be idealistic but the masks of the debaters are fantastically scratched.Their emotions just come out naturally amidst the chaos.
@@anshumandhal this guy who calls other media house as godi media does most biased debates .... As those BJP supporting panelists present for other NDTV debates will never appear in Ravish program ... His program is most managed and biased.
The real crux is all the participants are soft spoken, knowledgeable and gentle in behaviour and conduct. Rare personality traits put together....
The anchor is very balanced, fair, and asked pointed questions to both sides. Unlike Nidhi Rajdhan, she clearly has her bias/side and often get carried away with emotions losing sight of the dialogue.
so true...she is weak and not proffesionnal....and she is very ignorant
Let me start by saying that I think Mr Tharoor should probably be heading the Congress party. But, I was amazed by how bias the host was. She very smartly at the start of the interview introduces Jay as representing the BJP (1.10) and somehow Mr Tharoor is an apolitical individual(3.08). Give me a break. She then further starts to defend Mr Tharoor when Mr Jay makes a direct comment about Mr Tharoor (7.30 and 7:49). She was clear in whom she was supporting and far from being fair.
Veer Ganesh Thank you for pointing that out! I’m used to seeing Barkha Dutt, Nidhi Rajdhan, Ravish Kumar having very clear bias against the government or individual politicians. I still believe she is far better than the anchors I mentioned.
I agree
I've been looking into dictionary throughout the conversation
@@jithinMumbai What is glib, Cap'n?
Ha ha ha, same here
@@jithinMumbai I see....thanks! :)
Ha ha ha ha... True man
purana ho gya chacha ,naaye jokes socho
I never knew jay panda would be so brilliant in front of Shashi Tharoor
A good debate congrats ndtv, people's were well behaved unlike other news channel debate.
I don't see that the self-proclaimed "integral" people (Tharoor, mainly) are more integral than the rest of us - on the other hand, J&K is indeed an integral part of India
@@manofsan what about the people living there, who think Kashmir should be an independent country or part of pakistan?
This is the way a debate should progress. Both politicians and the anchor were polite, humble. Both politicians paid good attention to each other's point and tried to be discreet about there reply. There was no shouting no bad mouthing about any previous politician, no shifting of blame by Jay Panda ( which a fresh thing by BJP), Tharoor accepting that situation in kashmir was never good even under their rule, Tharoor even accepting article 370 was obstructing in many ways, esp that different flag, 6 year plan. This debate just shows how a debate should be because in the end we all want best for India. Jay Panda you are the first BJP politician, listening to whom was not about feeding to irrational jingoistic hyper climate. You did extremely well, esp your humbleness and politeness & that "lets not reexamine history, what nehru did, what sardar patel did" just increased the respect of your argument!! . Tharoor was well under his limits as a cultured and rational man & that "lack of accomodating different opinion is what BJP lack" was bang to the point, loved the way you walked that tight rope of aggreeing and dis agreeing. It was more like a debate between two well spoken, well read friends who don't agree with each other, amazing! The sharing of thoughts, without any drama is DEBATE. Thank you NDTV for this marvel piece.
Article 370: "What's Mine Is Mine, What's Yours We Share"
Tharoor: "Bravo! Bravo!"
@Shabbir Hossain oh please stop hate towards hindu religion
All kashmiri v people living around India youths studying all-over India getting reservation having jobs established business buying properties Delhi bengaluru mumbai and they would not even allow hindu valmikis any job in kashmir. But rohingyas porkistan are brothers. This is being communal.
Shabbir Hossain kashmiri pandit bhi nahi bhoole rapes in your kadhmiri villages. Keep that in mind as we keep it in ours.
@Shabbir Hossain This is actually a laughable argument. Have you forgotten that those Muslim rulers came as invaders from Afghanistan and Mongolia. Or Have you forgotten about the atrocities that the Pakistani army committed on it's own citizens of East Pakistan, or who came to the aid of Bangladesh for its liberation, for that matter? The status of minorities in Bangladesh and Pakistan is well known( in India it is deteriorating, but in India they have their representation and constitutional rights- something not found in Bangladesh or Pakistan). So your arguments are all devoid of facts.
Less than 10% Kashmiris want to secede from India. For the overwhelming number of Kashmiris, joining Pakistan is infinitely worse than a situation where J&K is under perpetual curfew under an Indian administration. Its good that the Government has abrogated Article 370 keeping the interest of the majority of Kashmiris uppermost in mind.
I need a drink now! too relaxed it was! good though...never saw such peaceful debate ever! good job!
Finally no bias by the anchor on ndtv. You guys can do more of this
do you know her husband is in congress and was an elected MP 10 years back
@@abhinavsharma-xb5bq so
@@vickydash13 so she is fundamentally biased...never even once brought the point of ladakh benefitting
@@abhinavsharma-xb5bq 😂 😂 wowww... Her husband is from Congress how come she is baised.. Ladakh was never a problem.
@@abhinavsharma-xb5bq 👍 nice reply. Keep it up
This is the kind of debate India needs. Both leaders are great. They presented their view in a impressive way. Shashi tharoor should lead the congress
Tharoor , NDA does not have majority in Raj Sabha yet the Bill was approved ! Islamic Congress is null and void. lol
passed with 2/3rd majority . Tharoor is underestimating our determination .
One of the most awesome and dignified debate. Hats off to Mr. Jay Panda for the way he answered the questions of Mr. Tharoor. Mr. Tharoor appeared to be naive when he compared Indira Gandhi's imposition of emergency to the lock down presently in the valley. And also Mr. Tharoor at some places was not agreeing to Mr. Panda simply because his masters (Tharoor's) may take offence.On the whole Mr. Jay Panda certainly is a notch higher than Mr. Tharoor. All the other debaters must watch this and learn a few good lessons.
Minorities around country feeling victimised is really unfortunate.... This is not targeted towards community/demography.....this is fundamental step to fix the boundary. When nation is born fundamental and foremost is sovereignty. People shud know which side of border they belong, ambuity gives fodder to incite extremism.... and our neighbor is professional in tat field..... It seems thr parliament runs on that issue.
Gaurav Huddar
They want to be with Pakistan mate
It has been done to make majority population happy..it is bjps majority appeasement and vote bank politics..cant use develolment excuse to do what they did..person responsible for gujarat is rewarded with being pm , what else can be expected
Mazhar Syed
It’s more so than that. It’s systemized and calculated expansion by a growing economy and population for resources. Since China is preoccupied, they stuck while the iron is hot
@UCgraMWPG36oZ1yKfPFnj6EQ i understand ur point...but unfortunately boundry has been fixed excluding kashmir..for kashmiris that part is IOK now, we lost them forever..having just military there doesnt help..370 was never a hinderance, it was an assurance provided by GOI which has not been honoured and they feel cheated..let curfew go off and very soon u will see the reality..then 'all is well' in kashmir staged shoots propogated by paid media will be exposed..i hope i am proved wrong, but i know i will not go wrong on this..u can not forcefully enter someones home telling them we know what is good for u and u dont know.
Mazhar Syed
Bada panga
a truly civilized debate...kudos! both of you....jay panda never showcased any unnecessary aggressiveness as showcased by his contemporaries in BJP..the eloquence of shashi tharoor is commendable once again
constructive critisim is the essence of a democracy, hope to see much more intellectual dialogue ahead .
Thank you Ms Sonia Singh for moderating a discussion that was debated maturely; something quite rare in our country these days
Sometimes you have to abandon your principles of left, right, liberalism,conservatism to think about the nation first
Democracy is bigger than anything.
@@inderdhaliwaal yes and article 370 is a black spot in our constitution . It's shame on us that for 70 years we r unaware of the plight of dalits and 1947 migrant of west pakistan in kashmir . Article 370 is against fundamental right article 14 (equality before law ) . Abrogation of trash(article 370) is a welcoming step ...
@@inderdhaliwaal Thats the point, there was no democracy in Kashmir. Because of article 370, only three families were ruling whole J and K.
@@Kamallohani10 sir, article 370 wasn't a grant by government of India to Kashmir ,rather was treaty and a promise. Demolishing the 370 isn't the one I'm against of , I'm against in the spirit it was demolished, by not taking local people in confidence , by blacking out the former state and putting the representative leaders under arrest.
@@anunayasingh3621 democracy says take the people in confidence, take the assembly in confidence but rather doing that , what the government did has killed the idea of noble democracy.
kudos to all the 3 in the debate, well balanced, mature, and knowledgeable. Other channels should learn from this debate.
Best debate I have ever experienced.
Congrats to NDTV, hope to be gifted with many more of such kinds in future.
Repealing Article 370 will benefit Modi's vote share in the upcoming state elections.
I dare someone to come up with even a single genuine benefit to anyone else.
I can hold property to no kashmiri, for the kashmiris a lot more, right to education, RTI, and 100 more legal support for their citizens
There you go. Now please, I'd like to hear how you think these do not benefit the people of Kashmir. The repeal of article 370 will help them flourish in the coming years and unify our country in a way that wasn't possible with 370 in place.
Simran Sidhu You idiot why don’t you tell me how has it benefitted the state?
@@viralbarot3203 it may not benefitted kashmiri's but it will definitely benefitt people in Jammu and ladak
kashmir don't represent whole j&k views. Kashmiris made hostage to jammu and ladakh people and discrimated them Because it was always ruled by kashmiri based parties (pdp, NC). Kashmir gets 5% of budget allocated to states for 1% of population.
Government of India spent 91000 rupees on single Kashmiri person per head annually as opposed to 4000 rupees per head for a person living in Uttar Pradesh. Still they kill our jawans and put stones on our jawans. There are people who migrated from Pakistan 70 years ago but they never get voting rights or can do government jobs in j&k. There are sc balmiki community who don't get political and voting rights. 370 was pure discriminatory.
This is the reason why kashmiri people are against the removal of the special status.
Breath of fresh air. Excellent debate. Thanks NDTV.
Here , first time I am watching some one made sashi tharoor silent , made him look defensive . Thank u jay panda
@surendra U can't see him silent,not here or anywhere...becoz he only appears in debate with exact data and opinion.
Excellent views by Shashi tharoor
A very meaningful dialogue, so many inevitable allegations raised by mr. tharoor and the anchor which was well defended by the opposite panelist.
And yes national interest should always come first👍
Shashi Tharoor is spreading falsehood. Article 1 of the Indian constitution clearly says that Jammu and Kashmir is an integrated part of India.
He dont believe in Indian Constitution
Nehru can not always be the ultimate role model of governance.
THANK YOU SOMEONE FINALLY SAID IT
According to Tharoor constitution and law is more important than welfare of people and the country
Very healthy and knowledgeable debate..Jay panda is the spokesperson that BJP needs.Same is applicable for Congress also in Sashi Tharoor. He should be allowed a more larger playing field in Congress
Very nice debate...truly impressed with all parties including the anchor...very mature, to the point, good orators and a major credit to the anchor. Keep it up!!!
I really appreciate this debate. Missing these types of dialogues in present media.
This is India's think tank..
Love it...
Read about Shashi Tharoor on wiki. Born in London.Still Indian. Part studies in the U.S. Still Indian. Amazing! ❤️
After revocation of Artical 370 and 35A the essence of democracy and constitution has improved and has taken more purified version instead of degrading.
Organize these kind of Debates &Dialogues daily. Then I can start watching NDTV which I barely watch
otherwise you will be watching arnab debate
@dearjohnny
you should answer me in a just way . when gujrath riots happened hindus attacked muslims with courage because gujrath was hindu majority state. similarly jummu kashmir is a muslim majority state , those who are responsible for gujrathi riots take an action to support a minority religion in
jammu and kashmir do the majority religion support it
i don't think any majority religion would support an act especially muslims.
bjp had leaped before looking. this was done to accumulate pro hindu votes in up coming assembly election , but this decision has deadly implication on majority people of kashmir .
majority sentiments will get hurt and shall turn to fighting options
@dearjohnny Parliament doesn't need the consent of the concerned state legislature to bifurcate but yes the President should put any such proposal to divide the state before the state legislature to elicit their opinion on it within a timeframe but such an opinion is not binding on the Parliament. Andhra Pradesh legislature got such a proposal while J and K didn't because it has dissolved.
Umar Abdullah Mahbooba made too much money with 370 nothing done for Aam Kashmiri
Surprisingly bjp was involved with both of them
@@sayyedraju1496 they were involved with BJP sounds appropriate
@@sherlocked5375 please elaborate
Investigate Mahbooba, Do not Rape Your constitution.
Mr Sasi Tharoor, remember what your party did in Andhra Pradesh in 2014. You do not have the right to talk on this issue. Yours is anti National party. India first get rid of khangress
Yeah, very decently conducted debate. When one speaks the other listens that's how it should be. Much appreciated 👏👏👏👏
I'm sure even Tharoor would be elated by the decision of the GOI, he's just harping the ✋line. This is his most uneloquent debate and he knows why.
Also big shout out to Jay to Articulating the GOI's stand without mincing words.
Shashi is a great champion of democracy and fabulous in debate. But I also feel he's a paper-tiger who talks a lot but I haven't seen him do anything extraordinary on a macro scale except belt out amazing speeches in the domestic and international arena.
I understand completely why you would feel that way with the way how matters are run/analyzed when it comes to the centre. It's mostly got to do with Congress not being a stable/decent opposition and him being it's spokesperson. Most often that situation makes it look like it's all talk and no action. However, he has done well as a representative of Thiruvananthapuram, the constituency of which he is the MP for three consecutive terms. Especially during the current crisis of Covid19
JAY excellent job! Let's look at the involuntary response from Shashi Taroor, nodding his head in agreement with JAY. Why do you want to go in person to see if J&K is returning to normal, when all you did during your era was just joining hands with separatists.
Thanks NDTV. This is the kind of dialogue and discussion we need. And not shouting and yelling. And thanks unlike Raveesh’s show the mediator is not biased.
U have tried option A..it failed evry time..now it's time to go for option B..as simple as that
shashi ji you want to know when will kashmiri start stone pelting?
you just want this to happen and then you can criticize the Govt.
vivek India is the occupying power in Kashmir it was the job of India military to win the hearts and minds of the Kashmiree people and they have not been able to they have been doing what other occupying powers have been doing murdering Kashmiree raping there daughters and taking there land and then of course when you are occupying power you will get stone throwing isreal has done the same thing they get stone throwing as well and the isreali forces claim they are fighting terrorists when they are killing civilians just like isreali will never win this nor will the Indian military will win learn from history did you except the British ruling your country the British considered Indians as terrorists so why did Indians do shelf determination why didn’t they not except British rule
@@NaseerAhmed-sc5bl inidan miliitary is only to protect india from outsiders. Pleasing people is local govt's job which they didn't do for obvious reasons.
How many people like ndtv I like ndtv best news channel
This is the kind of debate which youths of India wants to see! I learnt many things from this debate, really thankful and blessed to see such leaders leading the Nation!
Mr Tharoor....this is what the majority of India wanted.....and the gov is just doing what the majority wanted..... so spirit and principally and morally... I think all are well covered....
All three are intellectual and patriotic.. Very constructive debate no bullying or hate only concerns about the well being of the Nation.
Jay, you are too good. I agree with you that it was not that the BJP did not want to take the opposition with them on this issue, but it was the reluctance of the opposition parties to go with the BJP. It should be remembered that BJP appealed to the opposition more than once during the debate in the parliament to be one with them atleast on this issue. Shashi, stop making false allegations just because you have to defend congress. This will not go well with the people who admire you.
Rare and Refreshing to see a Gentleman BJP speaker who could actively debate the likes of Mr. Tharoor with Intelligence, Dignity and Respect. Mr Tharoor of course was in his elements and does what he does best. He was equally respectable to Mr. Panda. Great Respect for Mr. Tharoor. He should be the next Face of Congress... The Anchor too was very knowledgeable and balanced and conducted the debate in a respectable manner...
harish salve said" this was the only practical way to remove 370" its not that hard to understand
What a meaningful Debate by best representatives from both Parties . Hats off to Shashi Ji & Jay Ji ...
I think the way 370 has been revoked , is the best possible way to do it . All have been trying since ages but no result , YES this was well planned because using 370 to revoke 370 is the best legal procedure which was followed .
I think we should give couple of more years on this , we have already seen Pakistan doing great jobs in PoK , they are living well below poverty line and they don’t have half the rights which A normal Pakistan citizen have . Actually Pakistan did this to PoK in 1970 , and no one took it to anywhere , because India knew that this is going to be in benefit of PoK but it went absolutely adverse .
I heared lately , that Mukesh Ambani is committed to invest few billions in Kashmir for its development , I must say that everyone will be in sync on this that People will grow if they have money rolling in their pockets which is the sign of a growing economy , and economy will grow by investment only . I don’t have any doubt that INdian industrialist will pour atleast USD 100 billion ( tentative ) to improve Kashmir’s economy which will directly add on to INdian Economy and to their own Wealth. USD 100 Billion for 12.5 million people only , if I get the calculation than a share of more than 5.5 lac INR per citizen , it means a lot . It won’t come to their pockets but will roll in Market and people will
Have more Jobs , safe career , safe & inspiring living .
This debate is much better than Arnad's debate 🤣🤣
How can you even compare with barking dog program
THANK YOU. I wish this kind of debate become mainstream, instead of fanatics shouting and saying provoking statements. This kind of quality debate should be the benchmark for news channels.
It's a good debate. However, Shahi Tharoor did get better chance to put his point. Jay panda didn't interrupt Shashi however Shashi did interrupt Jay at multiple occasions...
Overall all it is a good debate...
These gentlemen make sure that democracy does not fade away in India. It’s true that abrogation of article 370 has not been done in the proper democratic manner because you cannot simply arrest mainstream leaders from Kashmir and break an important bridge without their consent.
That's the class of a dialogue..
Yeah,I've seen this a lot in Pakistan Parliament 😂😂Kuttay ka paata waala yaad hai
That's how it's done. Mutual respect between both parties, no heckling, no screaming. Anchor being the moderator and most importantly it is informative for the viewers.