Judicial activism is not the correct term for opinions which more strictly follow the letter of the law, even if previously held precedents are overturned by those decisions. "Activist" decisions are ones which expand powers beyond the letter of the law, not decisions which restrict powers to the letter of the law.
Judicial activism is not the correct term for opinions which more strictly follow the letter of the law, even if previously held precedents are overturned by those decisions. "Activist" decisions are ones which expand powers beyond the letter of the law, not decisions which restrict powers to the letter of the law.
This reminds me of most Netfix documentaries where you get one side of the story. Complete bias with zero rebuttal... I'm so surprised 🙂