Will the Switch 2 actually be the Switch 2?

With all of the buzz going on around about the next generation Nintendo console, I can't help but wonder, will it actually be another Switch? We know that, recently, Furukawa has gone out and confirmed that we will soon be getting a successor to the Switch. But will it be a spiritual successor? Maybe?

[@avarosannazero]

damn, i'm actually surprised you don't have more engagement from this video, its very well made

[@QnjtGWonQNqVsbYyzjx4]

Nintendo have done dual screen, 3D and camera before, which is dropped in transition to switch, mostly due to cost. VR is also not mainstream enough to be the only main push for the console. I think Nintendo should aim for “pleasant surprise” instead of “changes”.
Backward compatibility and hybrid compatibility should be kept but we can also introduce the idea of optional modular unit on top of that. This can allow for the lost functionality without adding cost. A third slide rail can be the way to do so, they can also feature wireless functionality for docked uses.
This allows for infinite possibilities and restoration of old function like dual screen and camera(separated docked and slides in in handheld). The console can also be used as a switch successor as this is non-intrusive

[@JvsBobGaMeZ]

The problem with the wii u was the lack of consistent software and the marketing

[@Ksescel]

This is pretty good

[@PMBL8C]

its going to be the switch u

[@baraakil4546]

I think to release a new home console and the switch can display the new console or play vy its own power

[@tailsprowerfan2729]

It should be called the super switch

[@Toastee]

they will add vr to the switch 2. Calling it here first.

[@QnjtGWonQNqVsbYyzjx4]

PS, Meta and Apple already attempted VR, I doubt this is a “innovation”.