Canon RF 50mm 1.2 L | One lens to rule them all

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 93

  • @markdbey
    @markdbey 4 роки тому +5

    The 85mm is my go to lens! The RF 85mm 1.2 is my FAVORITE lens of ALL TIME! Hands down! 😎

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      Solid choice! BOKEH MONSTER

    • @slickhatter9812
      @slickhatter9812 4 роки тому

      I totally agree RF 85 1.2 is my all time favorite lens; it is creamy, sharp and beautiful

  • @AugmentedGravity
    @AugmentedGravity 4 роки тому +4

    Nobody has anything on the RF glass. Absolutely fabulous.

  • @camallen7413
    @camallen7413 4 роки тому +1

    This vid is so refreshing man! You hear and see these professional photographers bring suitcases full of glass to their sessions when 90% of what’s needed is your creativity.
    I would say my favorite focal length is 85. I think it’s just wide enough to get what you need to get and just tight enough to compress that background into oblivion.

  • @DanielFazzari
    @DanielFazzari 4 роки тому +2

    I've used it exclusively for a few family portrait sessions...really was all I needed! Oh, and also to photograph a band at a club. The 1.2 was absolutely killing it!

  • @sticky8579
    @sticky8579 3 роки тому +1

    You said 80% of the time
    But what other lense did you need for the other 20% on weddings?

  • @KillaTuba
    @KillaTuba 4 роки тому +6

    the 85mm 1.2 has been sitting in my online cart for a minute lol

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      It def hurts the pocket book lol

    • @PunjabiGymBeats
      @PunjabiGymBeats 4 роки тому

      what happened next..? did you buy that or this..?

    • @waynosfotos
      @waynosfotos 4 роки тому

      I have it, it is nice and heavy

  • @johnnysoderberg9693
    @johnnysoderberg9693 4 роки тому +2

    It’s a fantastic lens which is my go to lens for portraits and I’ve used it for street photo also.

  • @longliveclassicmusic
    @longliveclassicmusic 4 роки тому +1

    For portraits of myself I typically live around 85 since I have a but of a wide face, but in general my favorite focal length has gotta be 105. It's more compressed facial features than 85 but isn't absurdly flattened like higher focal lengths can start to look. Still, I tend to primarily use focal length to frame the size of my background behind the subject and then fix faces with the Liquify filter, so my combination of an RF 24-105 f/4 and a EF 70-200 f/2.8 v.3 give me epic coverage. I'm honestly trying to take the plunge and grab an EF 11-24mm on Facebook Marketplace for $1950 one of these days so I can fit that wider end into my zoom range because I love the way it can distort a landscape style scene, even with subjects (somewhat deep) in it. I'm also loving my EF 180mm macro lens I got used on eBay…ABSOLUTELY FANTASTIC piece of glass to get super close, razor sharp, detailed shots.
    But yeah…for me on location it's all about framing the background relative to my subject. I think a 50 1.2 is the most impractical lens on Earth for me. An 85 DS would be fantastic, as would a 105 1.4 or a 135 1.8.
    That's what's so wonderful about photography. There is SO many tools to choose from, and every artist is SO different. I'm personally way more focused on lighting. I'm up to 3 strobes now and 2 speedlites, and I need more strobes. I've also already managed to get started on a huge range of modifiers from two Profoto zoom reflectors and a set of 5°/10°/20° flash head grids, all the way to umbrellas with diffusion and two Profoto style (Glow brand) white beauty dishes. Planning an octabox soon and a deep parabolic softbox… I'm super passionate about lighting and also color… Later today I have a 140-swatch ColorChecker Digital SG coming that Lumariver can use to create custom color profiles for CaptureOne. I've LOVED the results of my Passport II so much that I can't wait to expand that color gamut EVEN further!
    It's so addicting! Whether it's mirrorless lenses or lighting equipment or even backgrounds, there is so much available to both bring your vision to life AND get the job done efficiently!

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      Great point! As photographers we all have a unique vision we being to the table. How we achieve it is always up to our personal taste. You have a killer lighting kit!

  • @joe2snj
    @joe2snj 4 роки тому +3

    2 lightsabers on your desk?SUBSCRIBED!!!

  • @bushiswanonfilm
    @bushiswanonfilm 4 роки тому +1

    Still rocking the EF 35mm 1.4 II L for 95% of my shots on an EOS R, am planning to rent the RF 50 1.2 L soon, excited to see how they compare.

    • @mihugong3153
      @mihugong3153 2 роки тому

      How did your comparison go?

    • @bushiswanonfilm
      @bushiswanonfilm 2 роки тому +1

      @@mihugong3153 50 is sharp at 1.2 and produces gorgeous images, if you prefer 35 focal length more stay EF since no RF 35 1.4 L yet, if you have lots of $ buy both imo.

    • @mihugong3153
      @mihugong3153 2 роки тому

      @@bushiswanonfilm hehe true. I got the 50 rf 1.2,damn,what a lens!
      Would love an 85,but that would seriously overstretch the budget 😁

  • @tombuck
    @tombuck 4 роки тому +3

    1.2 is delightfully shallow 🤤
    You’re doing some excellent work with this lens.

  • @HeroShotz
    @HeroShotz 4 роки тому +7

    I just rented this cant wait to use it on my rp.

  • @scotta5743
    @scotta5743 4 роки тому +1

    I can't decide on the RF 50 or RF 85 1.2 just because I am typically a 35/85 guy. I have a 35 but love the extra reach and compression possibilities of the RF 85 1.2 for my kit. I do love the versatility of the 50 when I rent it but the 85 is absolutely incredible overall.

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      Both are great! For me the 85 is just a hair to tight. Love the versatility of the 50mm focal length.

  • @anoopchaudhary3961
    @anoopchaudhary3961 4 роки тому

    I really love the focal length 50mm if it is used at 1.2 or 1.4, beyond that it just looks like a normal lens. Manier time you have to close down the aperture and then 1.2 magic is gone. Where in at 85mm even at 2.8 the photos look magical, although it hard to use at a distance.

  • @marjanskrizevhevski2366
    @marjanskrizevhevski2366 Рік тому

    I use the RF 24-70 f/2.8 at f/4 for group shots (6-10 people in line). I've been wondering if the RF 50 f/1.2 can make everyone decently sharp and in focus when the lens is stopped down to f/2 or at least f/2.8. Thanks in advance.

  • @JuanLopez-oz9kh
    @JuanLopez-oz9kh 4 роки тому +3

    I only use a 24mm and a 70-200 f4 for all my work and two cameras.

  • @MiKeTuScAnI
    @MiKeTuScAnI 3 роки тому

    Great video, just got one in mint condition for $1900 plus $40 shipping. Can wait to receive it.

  • @melinafigueroa905
    @melinafigueroa905 4 роки тому +1

    Absolutely love the video and the photos . Definitely thinking I need to maje the switch.

  • @scottsater
    @scottsater 3 роки тому

    This is amazing, Alex! I had missed this video! You are making a strong case for me to consider the RF 50 1.2! I had been in love with the RF 85 1.2 (still am!) But as I now own the RF 85mm 2.0, I can see the versatility, creativity, possibility, options galore with the 50. Also just finished a family session, and would have LOVED this lens! Thanks for inspiring me, Alex!

  • @gaidohugo5337
    @gaidohugo5337 4 роки тому +1

    just got one, canon usa has a great deal on refurbished lenses, and this video is one of the reason i got one, TY !!!! (I know in advance I'll love it)

  • @royaltykidstv
    @royaltykidstv 8 місяців тому

    Ok at 1.2 you can get two people without any blur? I thought it was supposed to be 2.8 and higher.

  • @deebea6364
    @deebea6364 4 роки тому +1

    Hmm I used to really love my 50mm back on my Pentax k20d, but when I moved to Canon I replaced it with an 85 1.2 and 135 f2.., the 50 has been more of a wish list item since but is tempting... I think I might get the 14-28 and 70+ first though 🥺

  • @nuclear64_
    @nuclear64_ 4 роки тому +3

    This lens is super fantastic.

  • @photographybydaniellee
    @photographybydaniellee 3 роки тому

    I am trying to fight the urge to want this lens. My ef 50mm 1.2L is still producing beautiful images. I need to rent it and see.

  • @joannekeighery3861
    @joannekeighery3861 4 роки тому +1

    best video I've seen on this lens

  • @Chris.Wheelington
    @Chris.Wheelington 4 роки тому +2

    Loved this! Great lens! Awesome photos 👌🏽 but I have a question for you Alex. I have also been investing in the RF lineup and they aren’t cheap 😂 what insurance are you currently using? I just want the peace of mind you know? I want great insurance that will cover all of my gear and replace it if it gets damaged. I know about a few different options but I haven’t heard any I like yet

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +2

      Great question man!!! I have my gear insured through State Farm. $25 a month to cover all my gear

    • @Chris.Wheelington
      @Chris.Wheelington 4 роки тому

      Alex Barrera really? That’s awesome! So how does it work? Do you pay deductible? If so how much? And how much do they cover?

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      Your monthly payment is based on the amount of coverage you need. And you just file a claim if anything ever happens. Have yet to file a claim..... lol The PPA also has photography insurance options

  • @scothu
    @scothu 3 роки тому

    Love the 50mm over the 35 as well. Looks more traditional, where as the 35 can be too personal.

  • @waynosfotos
    @waynosfotos 4 роки тому

    I really like the look of the 85mm, 1.2 RF, expensive like the 50mm but wow, it is nice. Want the 50mm too, but they are both expensive. I use the nifty 50mm currently and for the price is remarkably good.

  • @olesjor
    @olesjor 4 роки тому +1

    my favorite is the EF 35mm 1.4 L II on Eos R. but if I can only have one lens then it must be a 50mm or RF 28-70mm f2

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      I can’t wait for an RF 35 L. Hopefully a 1.2

    • @olesjor
      @olesjor 4 роки тому

      @@ABarrera It is not easy to make a significantly better 35mm in RF version. When Canon has got it right, we will probably get incredibly good glass. then it will make us cry after we realize we can't afford it.

  • @giolee1274
    @giolee1274 4 роки тому +1

    OK, now i’m confused. Was suppose to order the 24-70 2.8 RF but now...

    • @estogaza1
      @estogaza1 4 роки тому

      I have both. They are diffrent. RF50 have unique look but RF28-70 is a best lens to have when you don't have a lot of time to change lenses or on the situation when changing lens is risky (like on the windy beach or on the cliff). I like the result from RF50 more than RF28-70. If you don't need versatility of zoom, I recommend RF50 with adapted wide primes like 35LII or 24LII

  • @theidahohuskies
    @theidahohuskies 4 роки тому +2

    I've been rocking the Sigma 50mm f/1.4 art lens for a few years now and love it... but wondering if I should upgrade to this bad boy right here. I've always been a huge fan of a 50mm prime, and it just might be time to add this to my kit. Thanks for the vid!

    • @ferusinfo
      @ferusinfo 3 роки тому

      Did you make the switch finally? Im on the edge..

  • @ThePataylor
    @ThePataylor 4 роки тому +1

    Great video, Loved the photos. I've been trying to decide on lenses to get next really helped. I was also able to use Canon UKs live chat Canon Live to get a bit more information

  • @hashimfarooq7958
    @hashimfarooq7958 4 роки тому

    How good and reliable eye autofocus of Canon EOS R is?
    This session looks so good,,,
    I personally use 70-200 ... But wanna try RF 85 f1.2

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      It’s never failed me, dual pixel AF is rock solid in my opinion.

  • @FotosyMas.
    @FotosyMas. 4 роки тому +1

    I’ve had this lens for about 7 months now. I was so exited when I first got it but truth is I’ve only used a couple of times. It’s way too heavy and I find myself going out with the 35mm 1.8 instead.

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      It’s not small for sure, but I’ve gotten used to the weight.

    • @waynosfotos
      @waynosfotos 4 роки тому

      I have the 35mm and mostly use for video on the gimbal, but not that impressed with it. It works good for close shots but don’t like it to much for stills. I have the 85mm RF 1.2. And really the difference is huge.

  • @RonnyWertelaers_fotografie
    @RonnyWertelaers_fotografie 4 роки тому +2

    I like the pictures, but i want to see also you go really close and fill the frame complete with the couple and see the beautiful bokeh more.

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      My Wife said the same thing! I’ll work on it :)

    • @RonnyWertelaers_fotografie
      @RonnyWertelaers_fotografie 4 роки тому

      @@ABarrera I have a message pinned on my camera bag now. Stay away from the boring middle! Get close of go far ! But that's the fun part, we keep learning...

  • @imagesbyrina
    @imagesbyrina 4 роки тому +2

    600mm at f/4 - I know, I'm gonna get smacked, but that's my fav! 😅Also, photographing non-humans at that focal length. ha ha!
    Though I love my RF 50 1.2 - trying to use it more.

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      Hard to shoot birds with a 50mm 🤣

    • @imagesbyrina
      @imagesbyrina 4 роки тому

      Lmfaooooo!!! Yea seriously 😂

  • @viracocha3125
    @viracocha3125 3 роки тому

    28-50-85 is all you ever need

  • @JohnLe
    @JohnLe 2 роки тому

    what do you think about the sigma 50mm f1.4?

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  2 роки тому

      I haven’t had the chance to try that lens

  • @Tudorguy-zw1ik
    @Tudorguy-zw1ik 4 роки тому

    Hi
    What’s the best focal length to photo small group shots? I just ordered a R6, but can’t decided on the lens. 2 of the lens I am looking at is Rf50mm f1.8 or 85mm f2

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      I personally think the 50mm is more flexible

  • @benoitpiret9065
    @benoitpiret9065 4 роки тому

    by itself a reason to get a R, to get to shoot it. I still really prefer the 50mm APO cron but not for weddings :D

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      Can’t wait to try that lens. A little out of the budget right now ;)

  • @howardtownsend2574
    @howardtownsend2574 4 роки тому

    This lens and the 28-70 F2 are the reasons I bought my first ever canon camera... well maybe the impending R5 also had something to do with it.

    • @charismaticrell4206
      @charismaticrell4206 3 роки тому

      Which do you like the best the 28-70 F2 or the rf 50 f1.2?

    • @howardtownsend2574
      @howardtownsend2574 3 роки тому +2

      @@charismaticrell4206 That's a difficult question. For portraits and images outdoors that standout, definitely the 50. For video and versatility, I'd go for the 28-70. The 28-70 has some of the DNA of the 50, meaning the look of images at 50-70mm at f2 has a similar look to the 50, just with less bokeh

  • @TEMTECKPHOTOGRAPHY
    @TEMTECKPHOTOGRAPHY 4 роки тому +3

    My 1.8 does the job for me.

    • @markdbey
      @markdbey 4 роки тому

      Damn man I wanted to be the first to comment! Ha! 😅

  • @oceaniccurrents
    @oceaniccurrents 4 роки тому +1

    Yeahhhhhhh I think I’m going to go for the 85

  • @joeltorresstyle
    @joeltorresstyle 4 роки тому +1

    Thnks to you i have it, great recommendation!

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      Thanks man! Hopefully you are loving it just as much

  • @slickhatter9812
    @slickhatter9812 4 роки тому

    I prefer the rf 85 1.2 it is insanely beautiful; a little bit slow but worth it

  • @Ravencroft81
    @Ravencroft81 4 роки тому

    How do you get both subjects in focus at F1.2?

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +4

      All about distance, the farther you are from the subject the larger the depth of field gets. The closer you are the narrower the depth of field is. Most of my shots are at a distance where 1.2 works. If you pixel peep one subject is sharper than the other but you have to pixel peep.

  • @mrk-verity4166
    @mrk-verity4166 4 роки тому

    What camera did you shoot this with?

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      EOS R

    • @mrk-verity4166
      @mrk-verity4166 4 роки тому

      @@ABarrera Ha!!!!!
      You really held on to that thing.
      OK I am now going to get one. Do you have any videos with flash photography and the EOS R?

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому +1

      Not at the moment, I usually stick to natural light 😄

  • @dimitristsagdis7340
    @dimitristsagdis7340 4 роки тому +1

    There weren’t many tight portraits in the sequence you showed. I suppose you could crop in post and create a few but maybe you need a higher MP count and focus inaccuracies would be more noticeable. I do not think you can do justice to a whole wedding with just a single prime.

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  4 роки тому

      That’s where different styles come into play. Our second most used lens in our weddings is the 35mm.

  • @weezyg.5724
    @weezyg.5724 3 роки тому

    just ordered one last night, wife will kill me tho...lol

  • @eamonkelly3256
    @eamonkelly3256 4 роки тому +1

    I dont know what I’m doing wrong. I have this lens and I can’t seem to love it. I almost always prefer the slower EF 50s over this one even though I know they’re softer. Now the RF 85 1.2...that’s a different discussion.

  • @adventuresofsteveandlaurie
    @adventuresofsteveandlaurie 4 роки тому

    Toss up between 50 and 85

  • @ericgauthier2665
    @ericgauthier2665 4 роки тому

    Look like the sigma art 50mm 1.4 look the same ...in some way

  • @angellondian7628
    @angellondian7628 3 роки тому

    If you can only have 1 rf 50 or 70-200? Which would you go with

    • @ABarrera
      @ABarrera  3 роки тому

      RF 501.2 hands down