I saw him on stage in the West End in 1988 or 1989, in an otherwise unforgettable play, but for those of us attending it was like seeing Mrs Siddons. His carriage. Those eyes. And here, the unspoken.
Emily Carter That the play wasn't a realist piece and couldn't really function as such. That onstage, Johnny Gielgud's character would be seen front and centre and motionless throughout, but is barely glimpsed here. And he really messed up the ending.
![[UA] Team Vitality проти NAVI | IEM Cologne 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wttO1zVRTC0/mqdefault.jpg)
Tuve el placer de trabajar en ésta obra . ¡ Fantastica !!
4:09 "Tell Uncle if he gets a translator be sure it speaks Bocce!"
“True Art is Truthful.” ~ Jackson Mack McGuinness
...this needs to be remade by someone who understands Beckett better IMO.
@@johnmulligan455 But not David Mamet.
I think this was the very last film Gielgud made.
Yes, it was. Age - 96
I saw him on stage in the West End in 1988 or 1989, in an otherwise unforgettable play, but for those of us attending it was like seeing Mrs Siddons. His carriage. Those eyes.
And here, the unspoken.
How did he so profoundly screw up her eyeline on the shot/reverse of this conversation? It doesn't match at all.
what the heck did I just watch
Would love if someone could try explain the full meaning of this?
Well... better to draw your own conclusions...eh?
It is a political play.
Welcome to Beckett
What?
Ho !
Brio !
Renaud
Make a Note. Never invite Samuel Beckett or Harold Pinter to a party. They're dead. David? you listening?
I think David Mamet missed the point.
Which was, inyour opinion...?
Which was, in your opinion....?
Which was, in your opinion....?
Which was, in your opinion....?
Emily Carter That the play wasn't a realist piece and couldn't really function as such. That onstage, Johnny Gielgud's character would be seen front and centre and motionless throughout, but is barely glimpsed here. And he really messed up the ending.
They speak robotic...
You write idiotic.
.
and too fast
in my opinion . . . .