pov: your teacher assigned this video and you went to get the transcript just to find this video doesn't have one and realize you have to sit through a 50 minute video to complete your assignment
It's funny cuz when I was a kid, I hated watching stuff like this for school. We didn't have phones to watch it on though. Lol. But now since I am an adult, I love watching these types of documentaries. I guess ur form of entertainment changes as u get older and the older u get, the wiser u become. :)
I just want to watch Haikyuu, and now my Science teacher gives us a 50 minute video and a three page worksheet. I could fit so many clips of sugawara in that same amount of time.
FYI, Marie Tharp found the proof needed to confirm continental drift. Her Colleague, Bruce Heezen at first dismissed the data (Collected and compiled and written about by THarp), but then realized she was right and they published a paper together, although she 'found it' first.
What? The scientifically proven method of continental drift called plate tectonics? Come on then, lets hear your wackjob reason why continents move. Please tell me its not earth expansion?
Sunday , Whats wrong with the expanding earth ? If you look , it is happening before your eyes right now . Look up James Maxlow expanding earth , he has the proof of it . This video is full of bull !
Thjeok Thjeok If I look? At what? I see no evidence. There is no mechanism for the Earth to grow. Maxlow uses a form of matter that a) has never been observed and b) does not actually create new matter. These fringe ideas that have no evidence or any scientific methodology are a danger to scientific progress. Plate tectonics has 1000's of independent scientific studies with evidence to back it up. Expanding Earth has 1 fringe geologist and a mechanism that is both invisible and physically impossible. Expanding Earth is not science, it is more like religion because you need faith to believe in it.
Sundaydish , you haven't looked into it have you ! Its a scientific fact the earth expands in the ocean Rift zones. Although main stream science says it goes into subduction , which is not fact . I think your the blind faith-er ! . So your saying that main stream science is also wrong in its observation that the rift zone creates new land .
Скільки часу минуло... Колись, 15 років тому я любив дивитись National Geographic Channel по телевізору після уроків. Завжди там йшли цікаві передачі, іноді я залипав на 3 години...
Considering the entire surface of the earth used to be molten . and now the molten part is so small now gives a sense of scale of just incredible time.
@@DeRothschiId agreed earth has literally absorbed so much mass that would be a better explanation as to why also dinosaurs where larger as their would obviously been less gravity more oxygen . We must have been bombarded with huge amounts of material.
Dusty Old Duster, There ain't nothing more ironic than the absolute, undeniable TRUTH. If I'm still around 249 million years from now, I'll have made my $ millions and I'll see if I can help you out a bit!
By then we could be a type two or type three civilization using a Dyson sphere to generate unlimited power and moving our planet where we want or solar system where we want it
Two quick criticisms of this documentary and others like it... 1. The producers are always trying to create drama throughout their programs. Often they compress events that took millions of years to happen into what seems to be overnight disasters thus creating drama where there isn't any. Enough with the drama!!! We tune in to learn things. We don't have to be constantly tantalized with drama to stay tuned in! 2. Producers of programs like these always assume that Humanity has ceased to evolve and will live in something like our current form for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. Come on, guys - we've not been here as Homo Sapiens for even a quarter million years! Two hundred thousand years at best! Okay, my rant is done.
The events on Earth are dramatic. Drama can depict real events as well as fiction, they are no less and in fact more relevant. The extinction events affecting thousands if not millions of species over the course of a few days is the most traumatic and spectacularly terrible events that happen on the earth naturally. They only have an hour to explain decades of planetary science. The entire point of documentaries is to illustrate and in fact dramatize the events and impact on the planet and it's inhabitants. Furthermore, they clearly explain that the drift of the continents continue today and will in the future along with change itself. As well, catastrophic events happen on Earth as well. As "dramatic" as the drift of continents seem the entire convection cycle involving the mantle, deep mantle, the core and oceanic subduction zones as well as the floating granite cratons is utterly fantastic.
As well, because we as humans are "aware" of the processes of nature and are gaining more ability to influence our biological evolution the acceptance that we must evolve into something unrecognizably different is false (imo). We will gain the choice especially within the next hundred thousand years ( if we don't become extinct or irrevocably lose our technological capability!!!) as to whether we preserve the human race as it is now, let it evolve naturally or artificially enhance /create our species and new hominid or A.I. species. Personally, I guess that people will take all three of these trans-human and human preserving/enhancing paths simultaneously depending on the district.
With 7 billion people today and not just 50.000 through millennia I am sure there is a new species conceived every year that through natural selection will replace homo sapiens.
At 20:00, the narrator says that as the European plate drifts apart from the American plate, eventually the Atlantic Ocean will be as big as the Pacific. True, eventually the Atlantic and Pacific oceans will be equal, but during this process, the Pacific is and will continue to shrink. California is getting closer to Japan. But then, at 48:02, we see Atlantic ocean shrinking, with the Americas drifting toward Europe and Africa.
It was explained in this video. At first the Atlantic will continue to expand and move Europe/Africa away from the Americas but here is the important bit i think you missed: the Puerto Rican trench will become a SUBDUCTION zone that will start eating Atlantic plate and reverse its expansion, bringing Europe/Africa towards the Americas for the final crunch.
Come on Robert, you can't tell me u don't believe in pangea, don't you remember the dinosaurs when the continents were together they roam all over pangea during Earth's past.
@@DeRothschiId that's gotta really embarrass you (both that you can't even troll effectively and that I had to unpack this message for you) *TRY HARDER, YOU VAPIDLY BLOVIATING BUFFOON!*
I wasn't gonna do the classic old folks routine of talking about how we had to check out books and get fined for not returning em...but dang it, that's what happened lol
This is an old video. The ridge is not pushing plates apart. The weight of the old plate drawing down into the subduction zone pulls the plate apart at the ridge. The magma then fills in the gap. Rock at the ridge is not heavy. Rock at the subduction zone is compressed with age and sediment. It is heavy.
Nope, the "conveyor belt" mantle currents are doing the pulling; since the oceanic crust is far thinner than the continental crust, the rifts generally are in the ocean, hence the oceanic ridges that are recent volcanic features. The Mid-Atlantic ridge, with Iceland a prominent feature, is a good example. The exceptions are the rift valleys, such as the East African rift where there are three-way plate stretching taking place - the African Nubian plate, the African Somali plate and the Arabian plate - tearing the crust apart.; it appears that there is a "super-plume" of rising heated mantle material driving this situation. The "conveyor-belts" carry the plates to their destination, whether it be in subduction zones, crested by volcanic island arcs, or in plate collision where upthrust mountain chains develop, such as the Himalayas, Andes, European Alps, and US/Canadian Rocky Mountains.
Derek O'Brien Actually, shuffler703 is right. It's called "slab pull", and it is the strongest of the three main forces driving tectonic motion. (The other major forces are ridge push, which is not caused by upwelling magma but rather by gravity attempting to "flatten" the mid-ocean ridges; and slab suction, which is caused when part of the subducted slab breaks free and sinks into the mantle, inducing a current which pulls on the remaining slab.) The "conveyor belt" idea is just wrong. Continental motions are *faster* than lateral motions in the mantle. It doesn't convey the continents; in fact it creates *drag* on them.
@@phoenixshade3 Thank you for the comment regarding ridge push. I had the 'old' idea and did not know it was because of the lithosphere sliding downwards.
Just like the sea creatures found in the Burgess Shale in the Canadian Rockies. Both regions were obviously underwater at some time in our distant past. Plate tectonics is fascinating.
so if the land that began at the bottom of the sea and ends up at the top of the mountian then wouldnt we find the oldest core samples of rock be at the top of the mountain
No, the ocean crust is the youngest rock as it is what subducts and melts in trenches. Continents are too light to subduct and so push together creating mountain ranges. Iirc, the oldest ocean crust to date is only Jurassic age or 65 million years old. And once mountains begin to push up, they immediately begin to erode. There have been three mountain ranges, for example, where the American Appalachians are now. The Appalachians are also the oldest mountains on Earth. Pretty interesting stuff!
the sea floor can end up at the top of the mountain , but the sea floor still has older rock beneath it (usually) . it just all uplifts together . sometimes the layers of rock can uplift in some areas and not in others . the uplifted layers can fold in places . sometimes these folds can actually fall over . that is where you might be able to find younger rock beneath older rock .
the best explanation for continental drift. i knew fossils were a major factor but the visual representation blew me away... god learning is awesome...
Can you please add subtitles next time? And make the tone of voice much livelier, BC I want to fall asleep everytime I have to watch videos like these even if I have to answer an activity😀😀😀
Love that animation, so nice to see one done by real scientist. I could be missing something but I don't understand why there is a question where water came from, hydrogen and oxygen being so very common
Earth is/was too close to the sun for water to exist as a solid (ice) in space. It only forms ice past the snow line which lies between Mars and Jupiter. It can't further exist as a liquid without the atmospheric pressure either, but it's the distance to the sun that would have driven off any primordial water in the area from the solar nebula. It had to have later been delivered or possibly released chemically from hydrated minerals.
Plus the theory offered in the video that the water may have come from asteroids and meteors leads one to ask where did these bodies acquire the water?
Can we do a reverse scenario.....in which we go backwards and see what was before with respect to the position of the continents...might explain a few mysteries of the present earth.... also can you tell us whether the earth is growing in diameter because it sure seems like it should according to this scenario you present.
Great documentary! But there is a pet peeve of mine expressed at 18:20 where he suggests that the pressure from the magma oozing out of the crack is what pushes the continents apart. Wrong! The convection current in the magma drags the WHOLE continent along by its bottom surface. That pulls open a deep crack, and lava comes bubbling out of the new void, filling it with solidified magma every time it pulls apart.
He says it explicitly in 25:15 "the plates are pushed apart by the pressure of the new magma at the edges". That there is (with all due respect) wrong! A convection current is a circuit, rising - cooling - sinking - heating. It is driven by the difference in density between hot and cold - hot stuff bubbles upward, cooler stuff sinks below, and the rest of the magma shifts horizontally to balance the equation. Everyone gets this wrong!
@@slehar I'm afraid, you are the one that is wrong. Yes everything is driven by convection (at least this is the most accepted hypothesis), but the actual driving forces that move the plates at the moment are "slab pull" and "ridge push" - the later being plates getting pressed apart from each other by the force of the upwelling.
I'm not that far into the vid yet, but I'd love to hear you explain what a convection current is, without invoking pressure gradients....I'm just sayin...
Question: at 25:16, The narrator says, “because the earth has a constant surface area… “ How do we know that? It seems to be an unfounded statement, since there’s no corresponding statement that the quantity of rock in Pangaea has never been added to or deleted from during the many millennia between then and now.
I so ejoyed watching the recognizable shape of the Great Lakes, only 10,000 years old, as they remained constant through hundreds of millions of years. Science enjoying artistic license.
Does anyone else think that water rain down on earth because of condensation? Since space is freezing cold and there is ice in space, wouldn't the heat coming off earth as it began to cool would have begin to condensate? I ask because I'm not sure. I didn't pay attention in science class and now it's my favorite subject!
Nonsense ending! It will happen so gradually we will adapt to it continuously, moving our cities as necessary, or abandoning them for new ones. Much easier to "terraform" Pangea Ultima under an oxygen atmosphere than to try anything like that on Mars! But - great documentary nevertheless, well worth re-watching several times. Thanks for making it available!
slehar I believe they were referencing the changing climate caused by continental drift. It would be uninhabitable if ocean currents diverted a specific way.
The theory that asteroids and meteors brought in enough water to fill the oceans doesn't make sense. Where, for instance, did the meteors and asteroids get their water? Water had to originate somewhere. Why not earth?
Interesting because it does summarize the Continental drift process in a dramatic way. But among other inaccuracies, Corsica and Sardinia don't belong to the African plate but to the European one. They drifted from what is now the Mediterranean coast of France to their present position West of Italy.
As we find out the earth is a dynamic entity, perhaps planets are the real inhabitants of the universe, we will never be around long enough to find out, 10 million years is nothing to a planet 's life span
@@andrewsmith7871 Actually, that makes a lot of sense. It would seem that the Atlantic ridge is "new seafloor" Meanwhile the Pacific basin is shrinking as the continents take the seafloor underneath their shelfs. I know it is more complicated but this seems to be the largest overall movement.
Documentaries assume literacy as the 7th grade level. For general purposes, it is assumed students are familiar with photos and geography of NYC. That, and it’s pleasing to imagine the city crushed by ice or continental drift.
The "Continental Drift Theory" was adopted by another consensus of scientists on the work of Abraham Ortelius in 1596, that Alfred Wegener in 1912 expanded upon by connecting animal and plant life and geological rocks to the continents along the Atlantic Ocean and was rejected by scientist by lack of evidence of any motive mechanism. Then came Arthur Holmes with his mantle convection theory and the scientist accepted his Plate Tectonics Theory where the spreading of the seafloor was validated in the late 1950s and early 1960s, but we know less about our seafloor than we do about space. This Continental Drift Theory relies upon the Atlantic Ocean spreading and Subduction of one side of a Continental Plate going underneath another Continental Plate someplace else, and Mountain Ridges pushed upward, that by theory the Earth's size remains the same. While there is no evidence of the North American Plate, Eastern Eurasian Plate, African Plate and Antarctic Plates being "Subducted" to account for the spreading of the Atlantic Ocean. There is just too much "Theory" and not enough Evidence to support the Pangea and other "Supercontinent" theories that have the rest of the Earth covered in water, breaking up into our current Continents and some islands - but not those created by volcanoes - that have vast areas on them with flora and fauna fossils from Salt Water in high elevations - as indicated around 35:35 minutes in the video - where his theory is that the American Continent was thrust upward. While that theory does not fit the North American Seaway (NAS) lasted 60 million years and became mostly dry land 70 million years ago by fossils of flora and fauna and where the vast Shell Oil Fields in the NAS are found, The White Cliffs of Dover are also fossil evidence of 150 to 60 million years ago fits the Ocean Level of the NAS 1,300 to 70 million years ago that have different elevations. But the not around the Grand Canyon around 6,800 feet, fossils for flora and fauna are 1,200 to 470 million years ago, doesn't support that the area of the Grand Canyon increased in elevation. What it does support is that our Earth was covered in water back to the time of 1,200 million years ago (1.2 billion years) when the fossils at the Grand Canyon were living above sea level. Everywhere around Earth is evidence where the action of water eroding mountains is found at high elevations, suggesting a Smaller Earth with deep oceans before any of the first microorganisms existed. The Expanding Earth Theories are that our Ocean Floors have been expanding between the Continents this lowering the Ocean Level with each Expansion of the Ocean Floors at different times for over 4.543 Billion Years. As pointed out above we know more about space than of our Ocean Floors when these Continental Drift and Tectonic Plates Theories were adopted. We did not have Submarines or deep water testing equipment that could go to the depths of the most of the Ocean Floors nor the techknowlogies to sample the Rock Formations - underneath the sedimentary layers of silt and decaying matter - to map the Ocean Floor Rocks and date them. This has been done since the 1960s and these dated rock formations give a clear picture of an Expanding Earth. An Animation by Scott Adams - the Dilbert cartoon guy - took these geological dated formations and created several videos showing how on a timescale the Earth Expanded. This answers all the problems those Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics fail to answer. Instead of the Continents Rising, the Widening of the Ocean Floors lowered the water that covered the Earth. What now needs to be done, is to match those Expansions to the rings on mountains where water caused erosion and to the fossils records. Because as the Oceans Expanded to lower the Sea Level there were also several Icehouse Glacial Maximums and Hothouse Glacial Minimums that covered different amounts of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. It explains the "Snowball Earth" 715 Million Years Ago having Glaciers to the Equator by a smaller sized Earth. Compared to the Pangea Supercontinent Theory " formation 335 Million Years Ago that continued to about 175 Million Years Ago it "began to break up" but the theory includes that the India Plate began collide with the Asian Plate just 35 Million Years Ago...can all be seen in an Expanding Earth that also includes mountain ranges being formed.
@@YA_zii-ml Haha touche. I was about twelve when the continental drift theory became accepted, I feel old too, but can still move quicker than a continent (except for my toenail growth)
Some of you might not enjoy this video because you are in school, but someday your bones will be ground into these same tectonic plates. Everything you create and care about will end up as elements melted back into the magma below. Then the sun will expand and wipe the surface of the earth bare or perhaps swallow it completely. Take your time and try to appreciate the knowledge you have access to here. We were born into an amazing little blink of time. Aware of so much, but it will soon be gone on a cosmic scale, us with it. There is no god or heaven awaiting you. This is all we get so embrace it while you can before we all return to stardust.
@@綾波レイ-j1m It IS encouraging. Get busy enjoying what the planet has to offer instead of wasting a brief life trying to get others to “like & respect” you for who you think you are, identify as or some selfish status, cos that just won’t happen.
Theory: On how water got here, and the biblical firmament described : I don't know why all the narratives say that scientist don't know how the water got here. And when they mention ice rocks from space, they describe it as a separate sequence after the molten rocks cooled. I ask, well why would not all the ingredients for waters have been there in the beginning along with all the other stuff? My thoughts are that when all the material from the blown up star came together with gravity pulling more stuff in, there was also the Oxygen and Hydrogen among all of the elements. During all the violent action and heat and electromagnet reactions, water vapors formed of the gases and rose above the heat of the earth up into space where it would freeze and hold as a sheet of ice surrounding the earth. Any that would try to fall wouldn't get very far as the heat would not allow it. This is how I decipher the "firmament" of the heavens. The ice wall surrounding the earth would hold in excess gasses from escaping and would become our atmosphere when the earths magma settles and cools. At that point the ice firmament would be so refined that it would have been like a clear glass bubble. Touching on the great flood in Genesis. When God opened the heavens, this is when the ice wall would finally be able to fracture and collapse. Hurtling from space at a high velocity, the ice melts by the friction of the atmosphere, and the 40 days and 40 nights of intense rainfall floods the earth to give it the oceans.
Never thought I’d see a scientific reason to explain a “god creation” So where’s god’s domain after the Sun expires? Or do they tag along with Elon Musk’s “selective space transfer group” to elsewhere in the vast Universe?
BUT THE REST OF THE USA WILL FALL INTO ATLANTIC OCEAN AND MEXICO WILL RECONQUER CALIFORNIA BY USING ILLEGAL MEXICANS LIVING IN CALIFORNIA.....THEY WILL NOT NEED TO SEND ARMY. DRUGS WILL BE CHEAP BECAUSE BIG MARKET IS GONE.
I'm having difficulty seeing the North American Great Lakes showing in early proto continents when we know they were created during the geologically relatively recent Ice ages.
I don't know - the creation of the grand canyon was totally a different one according to Nick Zentner (Central Washington University) and Tom Foster. Sorry, there are quite a few things else that do not make sense.
Beginning of doc they said that Europe and N.America were moving apart at 1" a year. Then @ the end they said N. America and Europe will collide. So, do they really know anything?
Well it takes a long time to understand. Your questions are good especially if it leads you to learn more. I am sure Nick would agree with everything here.
Millions of years? The conjecture here is breathtaking. Radio carbon dating has been proven to be completely unreliable. Plus, I've seen peaks like the Rocky Mountains - they're called lava spines - grow in just 4 years. In this video (@8.00) you can see a lava spine growing at roughly 1 inch per minute. ua-cam.com/video/3v7p9mMV6M8/v-deo.html. I just wonder what worldwide cataclysmic event could have caused the Rocky Mountains - or, for that matter, any mountain range - to form in such a short period.
axhandler Randell Carlson on GeoCosmicRex is a good start to those questions. I mean he’s not a god or anything but, some of his hypothesis’s are very interesting🧐
Part 1 I found it far too important to not stop and comment on this subject. And more specifically, an opportunity to express an opinion as to the true and accurate description of the mechanism involved. It’s interesting when you consider how much the standard model is dependent on the mantle having a convection regime. The great Arthur Holmes is credited to its acceptance in geology and the suggestion it could be the missing energy source to drive the tectonic plates. But, he also readily admitted it could be wrong. To date there is no direct observable evidence of the mantle having an up welling of lower density material resembling a convective cell or even a conveyor belt type of mantle movement beneath the tectonic plates. The standard model is only speculative in these regards. But even more importantly, the surface observations over the years have continually presented evidence of a mechanism of plate movement far different than what convection could provide. The mantle appears instead to be a solid state material that is 2,900 km thick, with pressures so great that at only 100 to 250 kilometers carbon can be squeezed into a diamond matrix. There are now a growing number of researchers who are skeptical of the standard model’s over-dependence on such an overly simplistic idea. Prof. Don L. Anderson of the Caltech seismological lab., had with many other geologists made critical assessment of the standard model.
authors.library.caltech.edu/25038/122/Chapter%201.%20Origin%20and%20early%20history.pdf New Theory of the Earth Anderson, Don L. (2007) New Theory of the Earth. Cambridge University Press , New York. ISBN 9780521849593. @t
"Because of the combined effects of temperature and pressure on physical properties, shallow stratification may be reversible - leading to plate tectonics - while deep dense layers may be trapped at depth." "Conventional (Rayleigh- Benard) convection theory may have little to do with plate tectonics." Convection is so poorly defined that it is difficult to consider it even a viable working hypothesis unless there is some direct observable evidence that it can make anything resembling a prediction of observation. Carlo Doglioni, the geophysicist and former president of the Italian Geological Society, and since April 2016, the president of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology has published some very remarkable papers in regard to mantle dynamics and plate tectonics.
www.dst.uniro...antle_Dynamics_ MANTLE DYNAMICS AND PLATE KINEMATICS Carlo Doglioni, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy Roberto Sabadini, University of Milan, Italy ". . . . . none of the proposed models of mantle convection can account for the simpler pattern in plate motion we observe at the surface, nor has a unique solution been proposed for how material in the mantle convects. At the moment there is no way to link mantle dynamics and plate kinematics at the surface, considering that the mantle and lithosphere are detached. The Atlantic and Indian ridges are in fact moving apart with respect to Africa, proving not to be fixed both relative to each other and relative to any fixed point in the mantle. This evidence confirms that ocean ridges are decoupled from the underlying mantle." This remarkable observation above expresses the reality of the situation. Geologists need convection to be a viable solution to plate movement, but after 90 years, its existence, let alone its functionality, remains unanswered in the standard model. www.electroplatetectonics.com/
I believe in your observations and research greatly. Additionally I think the ice shelves are moving like an ice cube on a wood surface. At some point there is a layer of liquid that forms from contact and pressure which then allows the shifting of these shelves. Similar yet slower and more precisely driven by our land massed plates that I believe are riding on the molten earth. Do you agree or disagree?
Theory and knowledge advance. Just as black holes have had controversy, so this topic sees varying views. Will we be alive when a firm answer is settled?
It's just a show, idiot. No one knows what the future humans will look like, or what Earth's continents and terrain will actually look like in 250 million years.
when middle school/high school students carry your view count:
pov: you're tuning out the video your teacher made you watch to read the comments
yessir
yes
Yah I had to watch it today lolll
yup
So *basically*
Its all cuz of that damned squirrel
Yep, Scrat and his mighty planet splitter, the acorn!
Good one!
Small World Too funny!! LMAO! I’d like to see him featured in his own movie. ❤️ 🐿
@@davewinship1826 no time for nuts.
his name is scrat !!!
Lol
To my fellow classmates
4:20
5:20
6:10
8:10
11:20
12:10
15:20
16:30
17:15
18:20
19:20
23:40
25:10
25:30
26:30
28:20
31:28
32:10
33:20
35:05
36:15
38:40
39:59
42:00
43:30
🙌🏻union redskins
I thank you hevily.
thx bro
doing God's work
@@nerooo8715 unfortunately it doesn’t get any easier in HS
pov: your teacher assigned this video and you went to get the transcript just to find this video doesn't have one and realize you have to sit through a 50 minute video to complete your assignment
yessir
My neice just speeds up the video ...
so, we aint the only one watching this video for the sake of school, my teacher just assigned this and I'm watching it on zoom
,pog
It's funny cuz when I was a kid, I hated watching stuff like this for school. We didn't have phones to watch it on though. Lol. But now since I am an adult, I love watching these types of documentaries. I guess ur form of entertainment changes as u get older and the older u get, the wiser u become. :)
yep.
I like the animations at the beginning. Especially how Central America just slides under South America and then right back out again. Amazing!
I just want to watch Haikyuu, and now my Science teacher gives us a 50 minute video and a three page worksheet. I could fit so many clips of sugawara in that same amount of time.
That's a big ass mood right there, I can relate
litteral mood bro
How did you read my mind?
Fr
facts
FYI, Marie Tharp found the proof needed to confirm continental drift. Her Colleague, Bruce Heezen at first dismissed the data (Collected and compiled and written about by THarp), but then realized she was right and they published a paper together, although she 'found it' first.
Yawn.......
@@danguee1Imagine thinking knowing the truth about a discovery is boring.
This would be a lot better if it has captions ;_;
Kristin Marie UA-cam has captions
Already
Who is watching this due to COVID 19 and online school? lol
Hey mr mills I'm on my moms account
What grade?
Meeehhh😆🤣awl human are watching the migration of fellow Corona viruse
Would rather watch this than the daily crap on tele..do wonder why I have a tv license, when most of my viewing is done away from a tv
yes
Anyone else click on a doc hoping its not one you've clicked on a 1000 times before only to be disappointed?
Nah, i clicked on it amazed that people were dumb enough to believe this horseshit.
What? The scientifically proven method of continental drift called plate tectonics? Come on then, lets hear your wackjob reason why continents move. Please tell me its not earth expansion?
Sunday , Whats wrong with the expanding earth ? If you look , it is happening before your eyes right now . Look up James Maxlow expanding earth , he has the proof of it . This video is full of bull !
Thjeok Thjeok If I look? At what? I see no evidence. There is no mechanism for the Earth to grow. Maxlow uses a form of matter that a) has never been observed and b) does not actually create new matter. These fringe ideas that have no evidence or any scientific methodology are a danger to scientific progress.
Plate tectonics has 1000's of independent scientific studies with evidence to back it up. Expanding Earth has 1 fringe geologist and a mechanism that is both invisible and physically impossible. Expanding Earth is not science, it is more like religion because you need faith to believe in it.
Sundaydish , you haven't looked into it have you ! Its a scientific fact the earth expands in the ocean Rift zones. Although main stream science says it goes into subduction , which is not fact . I think your the blind faith-er ! . So your saying that main stream science is also wrong in its observation that the rift zone creates new land .
Скільки часу минуло... Колись, 15 років тому я любив дивитись National Geographic Channel по телевізору після уроків. Завжди там йшли цікаві передачі, іноді я залипав на 3 години...
Considering the entire surface of the earth used to be molten . and now the molten part is so small now gives a sense of scale of just incredible time.
....and expansion
@@DeRothschiId agreed earth has literally absorbed so much mass that would be a better explanation as to why also dinosaurs where larger as their would obviously been less gravity more oxygen . We must have been bombarded with huge amounts of material.
this is boring can someone paste the notes
lol
Waiting for the flat earthers to disagree with the thumbnail
DaveL couldn't help ya self
And for the young earth creationists to complain that the earth is only a few thousand years old and the Grand Canyon was made by Noah's flood.
@@Sciguy95 6 thousands
DaveL
DaveL I invite you to www.tfes.org/
Yeah, and 250 million years from now I’ll still have that unpaid student loan, along with bankers that’ll still want me to pay it back.
You are obligated to pay back money lent to you .... PERIOD ....
Students aren't obliged. They deserve everything for free just because there students
Your loan is written off 30 years after graduation.
I'd totally be ok with that, if 250 millions years from now, I'm still running from bankers and mafia who i borrowed money from
Dusty Old Duster,
There ain't nothing more ironic than the absolute, undeniable TRUTH.
If I'm still around 249 million years from now, I'll have made my $ millions and I'll see if I can help you out a bit!
Earth: I am Pangaea again!
Other planets: It's because of that damn phone!!
The Sun: "ITS BECAUSE OF THAT DAMN MOON!"
The Meteors: ''Fight where we can get REVENGE!''
I want to thank the producers of this Documentary. Knowledge is key for success and I fully support them.
i woke up chris breezy
However far into the future we go into, American documentaries will continue to use fahrenheit...
Lmao
EASYTIGER10 you said American documentary. Fahrenheit works just fine, thank you.
betch your ass....
aaaaand this is why no one likes us
Some nations use the metric system, and some nations land men on the moon.
There will always be safe places on earth until the sun takes out the planet.
So liberals think, unlimited supply of candles as well
Maybe not in a "snowball Earth"...
By then we could be a type two or type three civilization using a Dyson sphere to generate unlimited power and moving our planet where we want or solar system where we want it
Two quick criticisms of this documentary and others like it...
1. The producers are always trying to create drama throughout their programs. Often they compress events that took millions of years to happen into what seems to be overnight disasters thus creating drama where there isn't any. Enough with the drama!!! We tune in to learn things. We don't have to be constantly tantalized with drama to stay tuned in!
2. Producers of programs like these always assume that Humanity has ceased to evolve and will live in something like our current form for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. Come on, guys - we've not been here as Homo Sapiens for even a quarter million years! Two hundred thousand years at best!
Okay, my rant is done.
On the second one i thought there was a difference between anatomically modern people and behaviorally modern people?
The events on Earth are dramatic. Drama can depict real events as well as fiction, they are no less and in fact more relevant. The extinction events affecting thousands if not millions of species over the course of a few days is the most traumatic and spectacularly terrible events that happen on the earth naturally. They only have an hour to explain decades of planetary science. The entire point of documentaries is to illustrate and in fact dramatize the events and impact on the planet and it's inhabitants. Furthermore, they clearly explain that the drift of the continents continue today and will in the future along with change itself. As well, catastrophic events happen on Earth as well. As "dramatic" as the drift of continents seem the entire convection cycle involving the mantle, deep mantle, the core and oceanic subduction zones as well as the floating granite cratons is utterly fantastic.
As well, because we as humans are "aware" of the processes of nature and are gaining more ability to influence our biological evolution the acceptance that we must evolve into something unrecognizably different is false (imo). We will gain the choice especially within the next hundred thousand years ( if we don't become extinct or irrevocably lose our technological capability!!!) as to whether we preserve the human race as it is now, let it evolve naturally or artificially enhance /create our species and new hominid or A.I. species. Personally, I guess that people will take all three of these trans-human and human preserving/enhancing paths simultaneously depending on the district.
I wish there was a way to TURN OFF that annoying background sound!
With 7 billion people today and not just 50.000 through millennia I am sure there is a new species conceived every year that through natural selection will replace homo sapiens.
I feel the earth, move under my feet...
I'm sorry
Happy Fox download kick the buddy
Who else has to watch this for school but aint gonna cos it's 50 minutes long.
me but i have too I've been putting it off for so long lol
Y'all lazy as fuck.
@@hockeyteeth you are correct
@Jimin Jin Jungkook J-Hope RM suga Vno.
@Jimin Jin Jungkook J-Hope RM suga V Yeah, and I'm a Chinese fighter pilot.
22:44 ... Looks a lot like the Great lakes, but I think that they were created during the last ice age only about 12,000 years ago.
Correct
At 20:00, the narrator says that as the European plate drifts apart from the American plate, eventually the Atlantic Ocean will be as big as the Pacific. True, eventually the Atlantic and Pacific oceans will be equal, but during this process, the Pacific is and will continue to shrink. California is getting closer to Japan.
But then, at 48:02, we see Atlantic ocean shrinking, with the Americas drifting toward Europe and Africa.
It was explained in this video. At first the Atlantic will continue to expand and move Europe/Africa away from the Americas but here is the important bit i think you missed: the Puerto Rican trench will become a SUBDUCTION zone that will start eating Atlantic plate and reverse its expansion, bringing Europe/Africa towards the Americas for the final crunch.
Who else is watching this just because its interesting
Adrian Romello me
Me too
The only reason to do anything maybe?
Me
I'm watching to put me to sleep
i’m here looking at the comments for entertainment because my teacher assigned me this video
Why did my teacher send me an hour long documentary for school.
Hi lol
Because you are an ignoramus
Because of
Inherit laziness
Most likely
I love how the people 250 million years in the future beam down to the planet but still have backpacks and battery-powered flashlights.
Yeah i like how they find a perfectly preserved car license plate 250 million years later..
innertubez they are so delusional I did expect space suits not Eskimos!
innertubez - Time dilation.
not forgetting scotty to beam them down and back
At this point there are flying cars.
This planet does have a mind of its own and we cannot help that. Continents move in motion when the mantle drives plate tectonics.
There's no collision, just expansion. Plate subduction has now been proved to be fake science, yet it's still taught to students
Come on Robert, you can't tell me u don't believe in pangea, don't you remember the dinosaurs when the continents were together they roam all over pangea during Earth's past.
@@DeRothschiId that's gotta really embarrass you (both that you can't even troll effectively and that I had to unpack this message for you)
*TRY HARDER, YOU VAPIDLY BLOVIATING BUFFOON!*
I don't see nothing wrong, with a little Bump'n'Grind...
Whos watching this bc of online school
I am
Me
After millions of years they find a mint condition NY plate... Mmmmm
Would have been better comedy to unearth a wrapped Twinkie, still soft and delicious.
Where are the Nokia 3310s? :D
My day be so fine then boom 50 minute required video worksheet
Damn that sucks
Stop crying. It's better than being forced to read.
@@TheNelly77 hahaha true
I wasn't gonna do the classic old folks routine of talking about how we had to check out books and get fined for not returning em...but dang it, that's what happened lol
As a former geologist, I really enjoyed this video!
Did you get struck off?
34:07 Grand Canyon information begins
The video starts at 00:00
21:25 dude gets freaky. They be bumping and grinding.
Lmaooo
This is an old video. The ridge is not pushing plates apart. The weight of the old plate drawing down into the subduction zone pulls the plate apart at the ridge. The magma then fills in the gap. Rock at the ridge is not heavy. Rock at the subduction zone is compressed with age and sediment. It is heavy.
Shuffler703 okay Napoleon
Nope, the "conveyor belt" mantle currents are doing the pulling; since the oceanic crust is far thinner than the continental crust, the rifts generally are in the ocean, hence the oceanic ridges that are recent volcanic features. The Mid-Atlantic ridge, with Iceland a prominent feature, is a good example. The exceptions are the rift valleys, such as the East African rift where there are three-way plate stretching taking place - the African Nubian plate, the African Somali plate and the Arabian plate - tearing the crust apart.; it appears that there is a "super-plume" of rising heated mantle material driving this situation. The "conveyor-belts" carry the plates to their destination, whether it be in subduction zones, crested by volcanic island arcs, or in plate collision where upthrust mountain chains develop, such as the Himalayas, Andes, European Alps, and US/Canadian Rocky Mountains.
Derek O'Brien
Actually, shuffler703 is right. It's called "slab pull", and it is the strongest of the three main forces driving tectonic motion. (The other major forces are ridge push, which is not caused by upwelling magma but rather by gravity attempting to "flatten" the mid-ocean ridges; and slab suction, which is caused when part of the subducted slab breaks free and sinks into the mantle, inducing a current which pulls on the remaining slab.)
The "conveyor belt" idea is just wrong. Continental motions are *faster* than lateral motions in the mantle. It doesn't convey the continents; in fact it creates *drag* on them.
@@phoenixshade3 Thank you for the comment regarding ridge push. I had the 'old' idea and did not know it was because of the lithosphere sliding downwards.
Thank you naked science good job
Just like the sea creatures found in the Burgess Shale in the Canadian Rockies. Both regions were obviously underwater at some time in our distant past. Plate tectonics is fascinating.
ua-cam.com/video/Iqj5T53NjxQ/v-deo.html
so if the land that began at the bottom of the sea and ends up at the top of the mountian then wouldnt we find the oldest core samples of rock be at the top of the mountain
Ryan Valk pretty much
No, the ocean crust is the youngest rock as it is what subducts and melts in trenches. Continents are too light to subduct and so push together creating mountain ranges. Iirc, the oldest ocean crust to date is only Jurassic age or 65 million years old. And once mountains begin to push up, they immediately begin to erode. There have been three mountain ranges, for example, where the American Appalachians are now. The Appalachians are also the oldest mountains on Earth. Pretty interesting stuff!
the sea floor can end up at the top of the mountain , but the sea floor still has older rock beneath it (usually) . it just all uplifts together . sometimes the layers of rock can uplift in some areas and not in others . the uplifted layers can fold in places . sometimes these folds can actually fall over . that is where you might be able to find younger rock beneath older rock .
Not necessarily: erosion.
mountains aren't that high.
the tallest mountain is mount everest.
POV: You were sick for a day and *this* is the makeup work.
the best explanation for continental drift. i knew fossils were a major factor but the visual representation blew me away... god learning is awesome...
Can you please add subtitles next time? And make the tone of voice much livelier, BC I want to fall asleep everytime I have to watch videos like these even if I have to answer an activity😀😀😀
You got soft hands brother, pull yourself by bootstraps and take a 5 hour energy
How exactly are subtitles going to help if you're going to fall asleep anyway? I'm sorry you're a 3-year-old who needs his BaaBaa. *GROW UP*
One hundred million year time scale. Don't think I'll live long enough to see it through.
Lawney Malborough.
Don't worry... Just do as much a you can!
By the times this happens mankind will be long gone.
Love that animation, so nice to see one done by real scientist. I could be missing something but I don't understand why there is a question where water came from, hydrogen and oxygen being so very common
Earth is/was too close to the sun for water to exist as a solid (ice) in space. It only forms ice past the snow line which lies between Mars and Jupiter. It can't further exist as a liquid without the atmospheric pressure either, but it's the distance to the sun that would have driven off any primordial water in the area from the solar nebula. It had to have later been delivered or possibly released chemically from hydrated minerals.
Plus the theory offered in the video that the water may have come from asteroids and meteors leads one to ask where did these bodies acquire the water?
This is the only thing worth watching now days 😃
I love Zircon which is too often confused w/ Cubic Zirconia. I have a 2 carat Zircon ring which rivals a diamond. Gorgeous.
Actually better than diamond, which has characteristic imperfections.
@EmtronVenger
There is extremely much of it in ZrSiO4,......................NOT!
Can we do a reverse scenario.....in which we go backwards and see what was before with respect to the position of the continents...might explain a few mysteries of the present earth.... also can you tell us whether the earth is growing in diameter because it sure seems like it should according to this scenario you present.
Thanks to the subduction zones, the diameter remains mostly the same.
Great documentary! But there is a pet peeve of mine expressed at 18:20 where he suggests that the pressure from the magma oozing out of the crack is what pushes the continents apart. Wrong! The convection current in the magma drags the WHOLE continent along by its bottom surface. That pulls open a deep crack, and lava comes bubbling out of the new void, filling it with solidified magma every time it pulls apart.
He says it explicitly in 25:15 "the plates are pushed apart by the pressure of the new magma at the edges". That there is (with all due respect) wrong! A convection current is a circuit, rising - cooling - sinking - heating. It is driven by the difference in density between hot and cold - hot stuff bubbles upward, cooler stuff sinks below, and the rest of the magma shifts horizontally to balance the equation. Everyone gets this wrong!
Like "fix a flat" in a can
@@slehar I'm afraid, you are the one that is wrong. Yes everything is driven by convection (at least this is the most accepted hypothesis), but the actual driving forces that move the plates at the moment are "slab pull" and "ridge push" - the later being plates getting pressed apart from each other by the force of the upwelling.
I'm not that far into the vid yet, but I'd love to hear you explain what a convection current is, without invoking pressure gradients....I'm just sayin...
Question: at 25:16, The narrator says, “because the earth has a constant surface area… “ How do we know that? It seems to be an unfounded statement, since there’s no corresponding statement that the quantity of rock in Pangaea has never been added to or deleted from during the many millennia between then and now.
Someone was bored. Bought a new computer, and moved land masses around a few times.
Great video, thank you so much 🙌
I so ejoyed watching the recognizable shape of the Great Lakes, only 10,000 years old, as they remained constant through hundreds of millions of years. Science enjoying artistic license.
Does anyone else think that water rain down on earth because of condensation? Since space is freezing cold and there is ice in space, wouldn't the heat coming off earth as it began to cool would have begin to condensate? I ask because I'm not sure. I didn't pay attention in science class and now it's my favorite subject!
There's one more thing to consider....You are soo HOT, you could cause global warming!
Nonsense ending! It will happen so gradually we will adapt to it continuously, moving our cities as necessary, or abandoning them for new ones. Much easier to "terraform" Pangea Ultima under an oxygen atmosphere than to try anything like that on Mars! But - great documentary nevertheless, well worth re-watching several times. Thanks for making it available!
slehar I believe they were referencing the changing climate caused by continental drift. It would be uninhabitable if ocean currents diverted a specific way.
It doesn't have caption 😟 I am second language, and it is hard for me to complete the assignment with this.
Anyone is trying to find the timing where the map clip is so you can copy it for a assignment but you can’t find it 😭👏🏻
The theory that asteroids and meteors brought in enough water to fill the oceans doesn't make sense. Where, for instance, did the meteors and asteroids get their water? Water had to originate somewhere. Why not earth?
Just curious, if New York is going to collide with Europe, how are they going to stop the Atlantic Ocean from spreading out from the center?
Yeah me too. Bizzare
What do you mean with "spreading out from the center"? There won't be any Atlantic left at that place.
@@whuzzzup look up "mid Atlantic rift"
If we don't learn how to get along with each other and take care of her we're going to be dead long before the Earth decides to rearrange itself
Wouldn't it be funny if there was an Astronomer named Dustin De Brie?
Interesting because it does summarize the Continental drift process in a dramatic way. But among other inaccuracies, Corsica and Sardinia don't belong to the African plate but to the European one. They drifted from what is now the Mediterranean coast of France to their present position West of Italy.
No one said that anyways
@@fatimasalakovic9985 “I really don’t care, do you?” ~ Melania Trump 😝
this guy 47:34 is what jacksepticeye would look like when he’s old
I watched it because it’s fascinating not because of class requirements
Europe and North America are moving away from each other.
I blame Trump!
hahaha
Dunkleosteus
Geographically. Politically, Linguistically or Philosophically?
Ya but in a few billion years it would meet at the other side
As we find out the earth is a dynamic entity, perhaps planets are the real inhabitants of the universe, we will never be around long enough to find out, 10 million years is nothing to a planet 's life span
I thought the mid-Atlantic ridge was going to form a new continent with Iceland being the first part of it.
No that's where they originally split from, that's why south America and Africa fit together. They'll meet up on the pacific side of things
@@andrewsmith7871
Actually, that makes a lot of sense. It would seem that the Atlantic ridge is "new seafloor" Meanwhile the Pacific basin is shrinking as the continents take the seafloor underneath their shelfs. I know it is more complicated but this seems to be the largest overall movement.
Remember that the rocks and earth on the land is older than the earth on the bottom of the ocean.
Truth is revealed by SCIENCE!
vanhouten64
And crass stupidity is revealed by the unscientific 97% of the IPPC.
14:40 the earth forms
2:16 Anyone else see that building in the background that no longer exists
Where are most new rocks made?
Well preserved after 250 million years 47:28
Right next to a Nokia 3310, betcha...
9:55 yea it's kinda hard. it's true, they do break down, all the time. and they don't even talk to you.
@_ASurprisinglyAwesomeWitch_ 😂
Great video! Thanks!
The people who made this seemed very focused on New York.
Documentaries assume literacy as the 7th grade level. For general purposes, it is assumed students are familiar with photos and geography of NYC. That, and it’s pleasing to imagine the city crushed by ice or continental drift.
Can't believe anything here when nobody was even smart enough to remove the great lakes from videos of the drifting North America continent
It was probably made by high school students new to the idea of plate tectonics.
The "Continental Drift Theory" was adopted by another consensus of scientists on the work of Abraham Ortelius in 1596, that Alfred Wegener in 1912 expanded upon by connecting animal and plant life and geological rocks to the continents along the Atlantic Ocean and was rejected by scientist by lack of evidence of any motive mechanism. Then came Arthur Holmes with his mantle convection theory and the scientist accepted his Plate Tectonics Theory where the spreading of the seafloor was validated in the late 1950s and early 1960s, but we know less about our seafloor than we do about space. This Continental Drift Theory relies upon the Atlantic Ocean spreading and Subduction of one side of a Continental Plate going underneath another Continental Plate someplace else, and Mountain Ridges pushed upward, that by theory the Earth's size remains the same. While there is no evidence of the North American Plate, Eastern Eurasian Plate, African Plate and Antarctic Plates being "Subducted" to account for the spreading of the Atlantic Ocean. There is just too much "Theory" and not enough Evidence to support the Pangea and other "Supercontinent" theories that have the rest of the Earth covered in water, breaking up into our current Continents and some islands - but not those created by volcanoes - that have vast areas on them with flora and fauna fossils from Salt Water in high elevations - as indicated around 35:35 minutes in the video - where his theory is that the American Continent was thrust upward. While that theory does not fit the North American Seaway (NAS) lasted 60 million years and became mostly dry land 70 million years ago by fossils of flora and fauna and where the vast Shell Oil Fields in the NAS are found, The White Cliffs of Dover are also fossil evidence of 150 to 60 million years ago fits the Ocean Level of the NAS 1,300 to 70 million years ago that have different elevations. But the not around the Grand Canyon around 6,800 feet, fossils for flora and fauna are 1,200 to 470 million years ago, doesn't support that the area of the Grand Canyon increased in elevation. What it does support is that our Earth was covered in water back to the time of 1,200 million years ago (1.2 billion years) when the fossils at the Grand Canyon were living above sea level.
Everywhere around Earth is evidence where the action of water eroding mountains is found at high elevations, suggesting a Smaller Earth with deep oceans before any of the first microorganisms existed. The Expanding Earth Theories are that our Ocean Floors have been expanding between the Continents this lowering the Ocean Level with each Expansion of the Ocean Floors at different times for over 4.543 Billion Years. As pointed out above we know more about space than of our Ocean Floors when these Continental Drift and Tectonic Plates Theories were adopted. We did not have Submarines or deep water testing equipment that could go to the depths of the most of the Ocean Floors nor the techknowlogies to sample the Rock Formations - underneath the sedimentary layers of silt and decaying matter - to map the Ocean Floor Rocks and date them. This has been done since the 1960s and these dated rock formations give a clear picture of an Expanding Earth. An Animation by Scott Adams - the Dilbert cartoon guy - took these geological dated formations and created several videos showing how on a timescale the Earth Expanded. This answers all the problems those Continental Drift and Plate Tectonics fail to answer. Instead of the Continents Rising, the Widening of the Ocean Floors lowered the water that covered the Earth. What now needs to be done, is to match those Expansions to the rings on mountains where water caused erosion and to the fossils records. Because as the Oceans Expanded to lower the Sea Level there were also several Icehouse Glacial Maximums and Hothouse Glacial Minimums that covered different amounts of the Northern and Southern Hemispheres. It explains the "Snowball Earth" 715 Million Years Ago having Glaciers to the Equator by a smaller sized Earth. Compared to the Pangea Supercontinent Theory " formation 335 Million Years Ago that continued to about 175 Million Years Ago it "began to break up" but the theory includes that the India Plate began collide with the Asian Plate just 35 Million Years Ago...can all be seen in an Expanding Earth that also includes mountain ranges being formed.
Sorry it's Neal Adams not Scott Adams the cartoon guy.
It’s amazing that Plate Tectonics was unknown when I first took Geology 101 in 1961! Wow. Now I feel old!
Well maybe because your old
@@YA_zii-ml Haha touche. I was about twelve when the continental drift theory became accepted, I feel old too, but can still move quicker than a continent (except for my toenail growth)
VERRY INFORMATIVE
THANK YOU
This is nice.
not here from school, i just really like science
Our planet Earth is so beautiful ❤️
Some of you might not enjoy this video because you are in school, but someday your bones will be ground into these same tectonic plates. Everything you create and care about will end up as elements melted back into the magma below. Then the sun will expand and wipe the surface of the earth bare or perhaps swallow it completely. Take your time and try to appreciate the knowledge you have access to here. We were born into an amazing little blink of time. Aware of so much, but it will soon be gone on a cosmic scale, us with it. There is no god or heaven awaiting you. This is all we get so embrace it while you can before we all return to stardust.
Thanks for that man, very encouraging.
@@綾波レイ-j1m
It IS encouraging. Get busy enjoying what the planet has to offer instead of wasting a brief life trying to get others to “like & respect” you for who you think you are, identify as or some selfish status, cos that just won’t happen.
You are wonderful. And scientifically accurate. Yay you
Theory: On how water got here, and the biblical firmament described :
I don't know why all the narratives say that scientist don't know how the water got here. And when they mention ice rocks from space, they describe it as a separate sequence after the molten rocks cooled. I ask, well why would not all the ingredients for waters have been there in the beginning along with all the other stuff?
My thoughts are that when all the material from the blown up star came together with gravity pulling more stuff in, there was also the Oxygen and Hydrogen among all of the elements. During all the violent action and heat and electromagnet reactions, water vapors formed of the gases and rose above the heat of the earth up into space where it would freeze and hold as a sheet of ice surrounding the earth. Any that would try to fall wouldn't get very far as the heat would not allow it. This is how I decipher the "firmament" of the heavens. The ice wall surrounding the earth would hold in excess gasses from escaping and would become our atmosphere when the earths magma settles and cools. At that point the ice firmament would be so refined that it would have been like a clear glass bubble.
Touching on the great flood in Genesis. When God opened the heavens, this is when the ice wall would finally be able to fracture and collapse. Hurtling from space at a high velocity, the ice melts by the friction of the atmosphere, and the 40 days and 40 nights of intense rainfall floods the earth to give it the oceans.
Never thought I’d see a scientific reason to explain a “god creation”
So where’s god’s domain after the Sun expires? Or do they tag along with Elon Musk’s “selective space transfer group” to elsewhere in the vast Universe?
Love out of focus videos
Surfs up!
I really enjoyed watching this video just subscribed.
I dont care who we collide with in the future, I just want California to break away today.
BUT THE REST OF THE USA WILL FALL INTO ATLANTIC OCEAN AND MEXICO WILL RECONQUER CALIFORNIA BY USING ILLEGAL MEXICANS LIVING IN CALIFORNIA.....THEY WILL NOT NEED TO SEND ARMY. DRUGS WILL BE CHEAP BECAUSE BIG MARKET IS GONE.
this is helpful
21:15 bumping and grinding. Ha! Are they knockin' boots too?
I'm having difficulty seeing the North American Great Lakes showing in early proto continents when we know they were created during the geologically relatively recent Ice ages.
I don't know - the creation of the grand canyon was totally a different one according to Nick Zentner (Central Washington University) and Tom Foster. Sorry, there are quite a few things else that do not make sense.
Beginning of doc they said that Europe and N.America were moving apart at 1" a year. Then @ the end they said N. America and Europe will collide. So, do they really know anything?
Love Nick Zentner!
Well it takes a long time to understand. Your questions are good especially if it leads you to learn more. I am sure Nick would agree with everything here.
Millions of years? The conjecture here is breathtaking. Radio carbon dating has been proven to be completely unreliable. Plus, I've seen peaks like the Rocky Mountains - they're called lava spines - grow in just 4 years. In this video (@8.00) you can see a lava spine growing at roughly 1 inch per minute. ua-cam.com/video/3v7p9mMV6M8/v-deo.html. I just wonder what worldwide cataclysmic event could have caused the Rocky Mountains - or, for that matter, any mountain range - to form in such a short period.
axhandler Randell Carlson on GeoCosmicRex is a good start to those questions. I mean he’s not a god or anything but, some of his hypothesis’s are very interesting🧐
I am watching this ADRIAN. Who else is watching this in 2020??
Part 1
I found it far too important to not stop and comment on this subject. And more specifically, an opportunity to express an opinion as to the true and accurate description of the mechanism involved.
It’s interesting when you consider how much the standard model is dependent on the mantle having a convection regime. The great Arthur Holmes is credited to its acceptance in geology and the suggestion it could be the missing energy source to drive the tectonic plates. But, he also readily admitted it could be wrong. To date there is no direct observable evidence of the mantle having an up welling of lower density material resembling a convective cell or even a conveyor belt type of mantle movement beneath the tectonic plates. The standard model is only speculative in these regards.
But even more importantly, the surface observations over the years have continually presented evidence of a mechanism of plate movement far different than what convection could provide. The mantle appears instead to be a solid state material that is 2,900 km thick, with pressures so great that at only 100 to 250 kilometers carbon can be squeezed into a diamond matrix.
There are now a growing number of researchers who are skeptical of the standard model’s over-dependence on such an overly simplistic idea.
Prof. Don L. Anderson of the Caltech seismological lab., had with many other geologists made critical assessment of the standard model.
authors.library.caltech.edu/25038/122/Chapter%201.%20Origin%20and%20early%20history.pdf
New Theory of the Earth
Anderson, Don L. (2007) New Theory of the Earth. Cambridge University Press , New York. ISBN 9780521849593. @t
"Because of the combined effects of temperature and pressure on physical properties, shallow stratification may be reversible - leading to plate tectonics - while deep dense layers may be trapped at depth."
"Conventional (Rayleigh- Benard) convection theory may have little to do with plate tectonics."
Convection is so poorly defined that it is difficult to consider it even a viable working hypothesis unless there is some direct observable evidence that it can make anything resembling a prediction of observation.
Carlo Doglioni, the geophysicist and former president of the Italian Geological Society, and since April 2016, the president of the National Institute of Geophysics and Volcanology has published some very remarkable papers in regard to mantle dynamics and plate tectonics.
www.dst.uniro...antle_Dynamics_
MANTLE DYNAMICS AND PLATE KINEMATICS
Carlo Doglioni, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
Roberto Sabadini, University of Milan, Italy
". . . . . none of the proposed models of mantle convection can account for the simpler pattern in plate motion we observe at the surface, nor has a unique solution been proposed for how material in the mantle convects. At the moment there is no way to link mantle dynamics and plate kinematics at the surface, considering that the mantle and lithosphere are detached. The Atlantic and Indian ridges are in fact moving apart with respect to Africa, proving not to be fixed both relative to each other and relative to any fixed point in the mantle. This evidence confirms that ocean ridges are decoupled from the underlying mantle."
This remarkable observation above expresses the reality of the situation. Geologists need convection to be a viable solution to plate movement, but after 90 years, its existence, let alone its functionality, remains unanswered in the standard model.
www.electroplatetectonics.com/
I believe in your observations and research greatly. Additionally I think the ice shelves are moving like an ice cube on a wood surface. At some point there is a layer of liquid that forms from contact and pressure which then allows the shifting of these shelves. Similar yet slower and more precisely driven by our land massed plates that I believe are riding on the molten earth.
Do you agree or disagree?
Theory and knowledge advance. Just as black holes have had controversy, so this topic sees varying views. Will we be alive when a firm answer is settled?
@@arnepianocanada “I really don’t care, do you?” ~ Melania Trump 😝
We weren't being bombarded.
The 🌎 was.
Now what?
Life?
Amazing.
ha ha ha they come from the future and don't even carry led flashlights !,,
I was more curious as to why they are walking around the surface in obvious daylight with flashlights on and pointing around...
It's just a show, idiot.
No one knows what the future humans will look like, or what Earth's continents and terrain will actually look like in 250 million years.
LED flashlights were banned in the 12th millenium to prevent global squirming.