What Does Supreme Court Ruling on Retaliation Mean for Employers?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 чер 2013
  • On June 24, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court made a significant ruling for employers involving the standard of proof required to prove employee retaliation. In this HR Compliance News Update, BLR Legal Editor Joan Farrell explains the implications of the ruling for employers. See Joan's video on the other significant SCOTUS ruling for employers on the definition of a supervisor for discrimination claims: • What Does Supreme Cour...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 3

  • @Tezy1020
    @Tezy1020 9 років тому +1

    I was wondering if all possible, if BLR Legal would discuss more in detail about Discrimination outside of Race, Color, Sex, and Gender, what other areas does it fall under, including Retaliation. What does that look like? This would be for the State of California law. By the way, I love your program, it’s not just informative, it’s entertaining and brilliant. Not boring and brilliant.
    Thank you!

  • @AnnaLVajda
    @AnnaLVajda 5 років тому +1

    What if the Supreme Court is the employer?

  • @AnnaLVajda
    @AnnaLVajda 5 років тому

    Well also if an employee had to make a report about something inappropriate or abusive to have been subjected to retaliation there was obviously issues prior to just the retaliation imo that is just continued and increased misconduct.