Which Classic Tennis Shoe Is Better? Adidas Stan Smith vs Reebok Club C 85 - In-Depth Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 112

  • @deadstrider
    @deadstrider 11 місяців тому +26

    The Club C Vintage is unbeatable. The leather needs no break in and is fantastic on comfort. The foam midsole means every step is comfy, no God awful stiff rubber to punish long wear. Lastly they go with everything. I've had smiths, dunks, and the 550 but always go back to reebok.

    • @neeckeetke
      @neeckeetke 3 місяці тому

      I now have c85 and stan smith, and this lie, c85 stiff, but stan smith more stiff. Classic shoes not for confort - is beautifull and practise, but not comfortable. Try ozweego - this shoos comfortable.

  • @m.n.d5949
    @m.n.d5949 Рік тому +42

    The reebok club c is just a great shoe overall and personally i think it looks great. Its very high quality and durable and also comfy so my favourite sneaker is the reebok club c 85 vintage revenge. My opinion.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      I agree that the club C revenge is definitely a great simple yet classic sneaker. Thanks for sharing and for the comment!

  • @erickaspiras9941
    @erickaspiras9941 Рік тому +26

    I choose the Reebok because there aren't fakes of Club C floating around like Adidas Stan Smith.

  • @deadstrider
    @deadstrider 2 роки тому +14

    Reebok club c 85 TV are unbelievable. Always had adidas before, after trying the 85 TV I'm not going back

  • @ACSSneakers
    @ACSSneakers 2 роки тому +42

    Club C for me both in terms of comfort and style wise, never liked the Stan smiths personally

    • @cf7792
      @cf7792 4 місяці тому

      Stan smiths look like cheap white shoes from Payless

  • @rmad1029
    @rmad1029 Рік тому +7

    I’ve been wearing club c’s for over 20 years. Never a bad pair, always comfortable and stylish. They really go with all looks

  • @achillesdanieladam9486
    @achillesdanieladam9486 Рік тому +12

    Great video!
    The older versions of Stan Smith with real leather were really awesome always! But now this synthetic upper is just not good enough!
    I switched first to Reebok leather classics which are amazing and just before ordered the Reebok Club C Revenge which seem awesome sneakers! Reebok has gained me over the last couple of years. The best brand for the money!

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому +2

      Nice! Some of the Reebok models are definitely underrated and deserve more popularity . Thanks for the comment 🙏

    • @ericstoner7234
      @ericstoner7234 Рік тому

      *les seules stan Smith 80's adidas vendu tout cuir ont pour seule référence IF 0202 au prix de 160€.....les autres reference s sont toutes synthétiques....sauf les modèles" stan Smith lux" look revisité au prix de 130€ avec trois couleurs au choix*

  • @kevin15776
    @kevin15776 Рік тому +6

    While I love both, Reebok Club C are better quality and more comfortable IMO. The Stan Smith has been around longer (1965) though it was initially named the Adidas Robert Haillet (renamed Stan Smith in 1971 when Haillet retired from tennis). The Reebok Club Champion (what the C stands for) debuted in 1985, also as a tennis shoe. If you're looking for a Reebok that more closely resembles the Stan Smith, try the NPC (Newport Classic). If you want an Adidas that resembles the Club C, try the Continental 80.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      Thanks for the knowledge ! Someone really knows their sneakers 👍

  • @torque667
    @torque667 Рік тому +3

    I have a stan smith and was thinking of getting the reebok vintage. Thanks for doing this comparison.

  • @djdelarosa25
    @djdelarosa25 2 роки тому +12

    The leather on the Club C 85 is much MUCH better than the one on the Stans. In fact, the Club Cs have the best leather for white sneakers in their price range. The Stan Smith (non-Primegreen) leather feels the same as Primegreen. I'd rather Continental 80s if I wanted Adidas.
    Also, weird. The Club Cs fit my wide feet very well.
    Good video!

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  2 роки тому +2

      Agree 💯 I’m surprised how good the Club C leather is . I had the Continental 80s also; great looking shoe, but definitely also not as comfortable as the Reeboks. Thanks for stopping by bro! 🙏

    • @mingyurise6044
      @mingyurise6044 Рік тому

      Would you say the same for Club C Vintage?

    • @mdfiiq
      @mdfiiq Рік тому

      Is it roomy for wide feet? Or should i go half size up?

    • @chrisgivestricks1810
      @chrisgivestricks1810 Рік тому

      ​@@kickitwithdangI would definitely say the Club C shoe model you have to know exactly what version you want. I always seek out the Club C 85 Vintage since it not only has superb leather but also Eva cushioning on the midsole

  • @tomwilkinson6727
    @tomwilkinson6727 Рік тому +4

    I used to swear by Stan Smiths, but the latest pair I had were the new plastic vinyl instead of leather, so they cracked around the sole after 3 weeks of moderate wear. My Club C 85s are so much better though, wider, more comfortable and more affordable

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому +1

      That’s unfortunate with the Stan Smiths, but I agree that their materials have been more underwhelming lately. Club Cs are reliable for sure 👍

  • @joeyveloso
    @joeyveloso 10 місяців тому +5

    As a guy with wide feet, Stan smiths are actually pretty narrow and a lot more restricting despite having a larget outsole footprint. While the club C *vintage* conforms to whatever foot width you have as they are using really soft leather. Probably the most comfortable casual sneaker I own.

    • @TarunoNafs
      @TarunoNafs 9 місяців тому +1

      Thanks for sharing! Very helpful info.

  • @brendangormley
    @brendangormley 9 місяців тому +3

    Just the fact that the club c’s are made of real leather and retail $10 less makes them a better buy. I have the Stan smiths and I never wear them because they look and feel like plastic.

  • @CoachKev0731
    @CoachKev0731 2 роки тому +6

    I actually like the Reebok Club better. Not big on all whites but they look dope. Great review Dang.

  • @colin6711
    @colin6711 3 місяці тому +1

    I'm planning to buy a regular (not vintage) club c 85. I normally wear US 9.5 is it ideal to go tts or go a half size up? I heard they break in so should I go tts but at the same time I somewhat have a wide, flat feet so don't know if it's a good idea to size up. I'm super lost. I went to the reebok store today at union st (nbc) to try them but unfortunately they are closed as was told that it's hard for them to tell when they're reopening. any suggestion please since I'm buying online and found a nice deal for around $55 for the brand new club c.

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz 2 дні тому +1

      Did you finally buy them? What size (your regular one or half size up)?

    • @colin6711
      @colin6711 2 дні тому

      @ yes bought them in us 9.5 and they fit just right. They do break in betw

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz День тому

      @@colin6711
      Good! 👍🏻

  • @froilanbas759
    @froilanbas759 Рік тому +2

    Hi there. Are these the club c vintage which is off white or cream color? I am kinda hesitant to buy these as I am afraid that they are too much in cream but on your video, it seems close to the white color of the stan smith. Thanks a lot.

    • @albertteng1191
      @albertteng1191 10 місяців тому

      Its official color is called chalk. The chalk is only avaiallable in club c 865 vintage. I personally like the chalk coz its not too white. It goes better with any clothes

  • @Anchor5777
    @Anchor5777 11 місяців тому

    I had the Princess Reebok in the 70s and 80s and then I quit wearing tennis shoes. I remember how comfortable they were with soft leather. I just bought the Reebok C 85 and it was the wrong size. I usually wear a size 8 and that is what I bought but it was too long so I bought the same shoe all white in a half size smaller. I hope it fits. I should get them next week. I can't wait.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  11 місяців тому

      I hope the size change works out for you this time 🙏 thanks for sharing!

  • @ranaswami5389
    @ranaswami5389 4 місяці тому

    I bought a pair of Reebok Club C 85 vintage but they are a bit tight for my right foot toe area. Does it break in? How does the shoe age with time? How does it stretch near the toes?

  • @lgomez8478
    @lgomez8478 2 роки тому +4

    as a stan smith owner of 5 pairs i have to defend it with the the older genuine leather models are nice for a budget shoe, i’ve worn my beater pair to many party’s and they are still holding up well, just to throw in for mention. the premium models with higher quality leather are worth it and i say is what makes it a better option models like stan smith h or swavorski crystal only go up to 130$ i recommend checking them out

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  2 роки тому

      I was really eyeing the Swarovski pair when they first came out, a very interesting twist to a classic . Gonna keep an eye out for them again haha, Thanks for your input !

  • @thetravelingteacher1001
    @thetravelingteacher1001 9 місяців тому +2

    club C for me, it is very lowkey yet comfortable. It speaks a lot of personality than the smith

  • @RexChevalchroi
    @RexChevalchroi 5 місяців тому

    I'm faithful to both. No comparison needed, both are the best. I have Club Cs first and then started on SS afterwards

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  5 місяців тому

      Can’t go wrong with either option for sure 👍

  • @albertteng1191
    @albertteng1191 10 місяців тому +2

    You need break in period for the stan smiths, the C85 is pure comfort the moment you step in

  • @neerand
    @neerand Рік тому +3

    What are the sizes in UK of these two shoes?

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому +3

      Stan Smith is UK 9, Reebok Club C is UK 8.5, but are both US 9.5

    • @neerand
      @neerand Рік тому

      @@kickitwithdang thank you. 😀

    • @chidchid7742
      @chidchid7742 Рік тому +1

      Yow thank you! Just ordered mine in USMen 9.5, and was a bit paranoid til now. Thank you both for the question and the answer. 😂

    • @rob8311
      @rob8311 11 місяців тому +1

      ​@@kickitwithdangthanks for clarifying this actually. An important point that I think some people miss, Adidas UK sizing is different from Nike and Reebok. Always add 0.5 to the Adidas shoes for the equivalent size, so 6.5 UK for Nike should be similar to a 7 UK for Adidas, the US sizing stays the same.

    • @Mto692
      @Mto692 10 місяців тому

      Hi Mate! Can you please make a video about checking the insole pad or using a tape measure. Just to make sure it's true to size and the real CM for UK 8.5 for 85 Vintage

  • @luckystriker6606
    @luckystriker6606 Рік тому +4

    I like the Stan Smiths very much, but I don't like the Primegreen material. Adidas makes you pay the same price for inferior material. For me reason enough to but Reebok sneakers.

  • @josdav07
    @josdav07 Рік тому +2

    I like stan smiths but since they're using plastic instead of leather, I'm looking for alternatives.

  • @azurbtkl3901
    @azurbtkl3901 Рік тому +1

    Hey thanks for the video!! I really like the Club c 85 but I'm afraid they're too hot for summer, with that "velvet" like inside... What do you think? Thanks!!

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому +2

      Yes you’re right, the inner lining may feel warm and sweaty with minimal ventilation - not a shoe I’d wear out in a very hot day haha . Thanks for watching !

    • @azurbtkl3901
      @azurbtkl3901 Рік тому

      @@kickitwithdang thank you!

  • @wyattbreymeyer4033
    @wyattbreymeyer4033 2 роки тому +1

    ive owned about 4 pairs of stan smiths over the years i love em! i am interested in the club cs though

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  2 роки тому

      Stan smiths are just a staple and you can’t go wrong 🙌 thanks for sharing bro !

  • @carrot30247
    @carrot30247 Рік тому

    This video really helped me to make a decision.! Thanks.!

  • @suryagarg7472
    @suryagarg7472 Рік тому +1

    Which is more durable?

  • @gilbert2303
    @gilbert2303 Рік тому

    i have wider feet and i wear orthotics. You think the stand smith will work?

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      To be honest it’s tough to say. Although you can remove the included inserts, I wouldn’t necessarily consider these a wide shoe. It’s best that you try them in person in store to be sure. Good luck !

  • @prabinkoirala5604
    @prabinkoirala5604 10 місяців тому +2

    Reebok more beautiful and more real
    And budget friendly with so much quality ❤❤

  • @gilbert2303
    @gilbert2303 Рік тому

    can i remove the shoe liner?

  • @lanamichellehughes
    @lanamichellehughes Рік тому

    For a summer shoe - which one breathes better?

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      I’d say the reeboks - they have more ventilation holes . Stan smith leather can also cause some humidity inside your feet if you’re really susceptible to that issue

  • @nizar_82
    @nizar_82 Рік тому +1

    i prefer club c i have the revenge version and i love them !!!

  • @kidcoma1340
    @kidcoma1340 2 місяці тому +2

    Am I the only one who thinks Stan Smiths look goofy af? Or maybe I have worn Reebok too long now idk.

  • @joseoctaviomorenorodriguez9541
    @joseoctaviomorenorodriguez9541 10 місяців тому

    Been always a fan of Samba's (not a Stan Smiths fan) but after my first pair of Club Cs Revenge there's no coming back. A lot more durable and less expensive than Sambas.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  10 місяців тому +1

      Personally I’ve been curious about trying out sambas, but after this comment, I guess I don’t really need to try them anymore 😅👍 thanks for sharing!

    • @joseoctaviomorenorodriguez9541
      @joseoctaviomorenorodriguez9541 10 місяців тому +1

      @@kickitwithdang Yes at first they look great and feel great, but the soles and suede aren't durable. Classic Pumas and Reeboks are better overall.

  • @prabinkoirala5604
    @prabinkoirala5604 10 місяців тому +1

    Reebok ❤❤❤❤

  • @nathanunitedheilbron5676
    @nathanunitedheilbron5676 8 місяців тому +3

    The class C85 has more popularity than the stan smith, by a mile

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz 2 дні тому

      Possibly. But the Adidas are clearly more stylish and, hence, more posh and worn by celebrities.
      My pick, however, are the Reeboks for two reasons: the soles are glued + stitched (only glued on the Adidas) and they use real leather ("vegan" = fake leather on the Adidas).

  • @swordsaver
    @swordsaver 2 роки тому +9

    Club C for me. Never liked the look or feel of the Stan Smith. The fake vegan leather makes the shoe a downgrade and lower quality.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  2 роки тому

      Yeah, the vegan leather on the Stan smiths have a bit too much of a glossy and cheaper appearance. They’re better in person, but still I understand what you mean haha

  • @Stephstar80
    @Stephstar80 Рік тому

    August 2021, I bought my first Stan Smiths.... And I lloooooovveee them!
    I wear them at least 4 times a week since I got them...... Therefor, the sole is getting thinner and thinner.... So, I thought... It was time to buy a new pair of whites!
    This time, I ordered the reebok C.... And I hope they feel about the same as the Stan's...... I'm soooo exited..., 😂

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      I hope you like them too! Both shoes are very reliable and classic, so imo you can’t go wrong either way . Thanks for the comment! 🙏

  • @mauriciolacruz
    @mauriciolacruz 2 дні тому

    Adidas' soles are glued, while Reeboks' are glued + stitched.
    This detail alone means that, no matter how stylish the Adidas may be, I would immediately discard them and, without any doubt, go for Reeboks. (Plus the Reeboks are real leather!)
    Regards.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  3 години тому

      There’s definitely a difference in better quality with the Reeboks from what I’ve seen 💯

  • @maitrehg
    @maitrehg Рік тому +5

    Reebok by a mile.

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      They definitely have their advantages over stan smiths 👍

  • @ZavieM
    @ZavieM 2 роки тому +4

    The Stan Smiths look so GOOD. I think I would sacrifice comfort just for the aesthetic 😅

    • @mauriciolacruz
      @mauriciolacruz 2 дні тому

      I understand you. These Adidas are so... Classic, timeless, classy...
      I think, though, the Reeboks are better.

  • @ThisIsTequilaTime
    @ThisIsTequilaTime 6 місяців тому +3

    “Vegan leather” = plastic

  • @RideFreeGamer
    @RideFreeGamer 2 роки тому

    Cool share 😎 👌 👍 big like and full support 👌 👍 🙌

  • @KedaiNasi
    @KedaiNasi 4 місяці тому

    i love choosing the lesser worn shoes... so C85 it is.

  • @reigon9402
    @reigon9402 Рік тому +7

    Synthetic leather 🤮 in south Florida is like putting your feet inside a garbage bag.. So sweaty and nasty

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому +1

      Yeah the ventilation isn’t that great haha

    • @reigon9402
      @reigon9402 Рік тому +5

      I hate when manufacturers call it synthetic leather.. Call it what it's.. Polyurethane, plastic.. Or PU

  • @nitindugar
    @nitindugar 4 місяці тому

    are vegan stan smith durable or not

  • @neerand
    @neerand Рік тому

    What’s your height bro?

  • @louio
    @louio Рік тому

    Reebok is the way to go, those Adidas look like they will easily get dirty & crease badly within the first hour while the C 85s will hold up for a week before they see dirt.

  • @etagged
    @etagged 2 роки тому

    My guy, please do some real research on the Club C’s. They’re revered in the creative, alternative streetwear space for their minimalist yet structurally elegant design. Fashion Forward Always (Kevin) has some good videos on them that cover both the history and the cultural significance of the Club C.

  • @carlosgrey37
    @carlosgrey37 Місяць тому

    Adidas 🔥

  • @userre85
    @userre85 Рік тому +4

    Club C was worn by Pablo Escobar in Narcos🥴

  • @levia1398
    @levia1398 Рік тому

    LIfe is more interesting with club C 85

  • @natskiton
    @natskiton Рік тому

    I don't like the insole leather of Stan Smith its very uncomfortable and its sucks 👎

  • @realblackbetty2204
    @realblackbetty2204 Рік тому

    Stan smith front is too wide

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      They’re definitely wide compared to the Reebok club Cs

  • @sws6767
    @sws6767 8 місяців тому +1

    What abomination in the name of shoes is this from Alexander McQueen!!!

  • @saigoneseSG
    @saigoneseSG Рік тому +1

    This Reebok is exactly like Adidas Continental 84, never like Stan smith…I rather get Adidas Superstar ✌️

    • @kickitwithdang
      @kickitwithdang  Рік тому

      Agree, there are lot of similarities between Reebok and continental 84 for sure 👍