Congratulations for the direct questions about reading habits. I would have liked to hear even more details, like number of hours spent reading or the way he underlines.
Glad I clicked on this link and could hear Georg speak more casually (than normal!). Really great insights into the learning process and his reflection on dialetics, gender identity, etc. Looked up Macau, China afterwards and that’s an interesting place!
Great interview, Hans-Georg is always great. If I may, there is an interview with Johannes (and Hans-Georg too) on my channel. But certainly, Scott could do something delving deeper into the Zettelkasten!
@@Undisciplined Thank for you the info. I actually really enjoyed the interview with Johannes Schmidt in your channel! I will check out Hans-Georg's as well.
@@Undisciplined Lol, that topic is completely unrelated, has already been covered on many channels and not particularly academically interesting at all.
I joined a dating site recently and put on my profile: 'I am looking for love but I will settle for sex'. It was taken down, against their guidelines and policies apparently. Honesty goes against their guidelines? 🙁
This is too Moeller, if I could ever get him on my show I would love to grill him about Luhmann. I find his book Radical Luhmann to be a poor representation of Luhmann's work.
More like whiner and defender of traditional values over so called sjw ideology. He cares not for free speech. **What do you mean by free/what do you mean by speech?**
Thanks for introducing Luhman and his media theories. It was eye opening 👁️
Congratulations for the direct questions about reading habits. I would have liked to hear even more details, like number of hours spent reading or the way he underlines.
Glad I clicked on this link and could hear Georg speak more casually (than normal!). Really great insights into the learning process and his reflection on dialetics, gender identity, etc. Looked up Macau, China afterwards and that’s an interesting place!
#1:29:12 “Luhmann is not known for his social theoretical work, his theory of everything, he is known for his Zettelkasten.”
Was amazingly interesting. Loved how Mr. Moeller advocated for "Surgical Reading".
I even e-mailed him afterward.
Thanks for conducting this interview @Scott P. Scheper
And thanks for attending @Carefree Wandering
Can't wait, Scott, my sensei.
Thanks Scott, thanks dr. Moeller!
Thank you for bringing us Dr. Moeller, Scott. Great interview.
Glad you enjoyed it! 👊🗃️✍🏼
Thank you for the interview, Scott. I would love it if you brought in Markus Krajewski or Johannes Schmidt (from the Luhmann archive) as well 😊
😎
Great interview, Hans-Georg is always great. If I may, there is an interview with Johannes (and Hans-Georg too) on my channel. But certainly, Scott could do something delving deeper into the Zettelkasten!
@@Undisciplined Thank for you the info. I actually really enjoyed the interview with Johannes Schmidt in your channel! I will check out Hans-Georg's as well.
@@Undisciplined Lol, that topic is completely unrelated, has already been covered on many channels and not particularly academically interesting at all.
@@Liliquan You too, are not particularly academically interesting. But let's let sleeping dogs lie.
I joined a dating site recently and put on my profile: 'I am looking for love but I will settle for sex'.
It was taken down, against their guidelines and policies apparently. Honesty goes against their guidelines? 🙁
Hans please talk to John Vervaeke.
Thanks, this was insightful. Great finish!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Peterson was asked to answers people's questions on Quora. . . which later developed into his two books on Order, then on Chaos. . . (1:01:09)
Except that the second book wasn't on Chaos at all. Merely a cheap marketing ploy to justify 12 more rules of nonsense.
Peterson also views both as necessary, like Yin and Yang (39:56)
👍
Sounds similar to Syntopical Reading / Mortimer Adler. (1:12:50)
This is exactly what Peterson says, regarding order & chaos. (44:20)
This is too Moeller, if I could ever get him on my show I would love to grill him about Luhmann. I find his book Radical Luhmann to be a poor representation of Luhmann's work.
Well you're a big old meanie, big old meanies are always wrong, modus tollens you're wrong.
You are always 50% correct and 50% wrong. -- Sri Baba Ganoush
This mischaracterizes Peterson; his two popular books are on: 1- Order and 2 - Chaos. (45:26)
Peterson does talk about "good & evil". . . however, he does not make the equivalency: good & evil = order & chaos. (41:40)
Interesting; thanks for pointing that out Chris
@@scottscheper Sure ! 🙂
anyone who listens to Peterson unironically is not worth my time
@@hyperrealhank 🤣
Peterson's "magnum opus", Maps of Meaning, has nothing to do with self-help. (58:25)
It may of needed some self help given its absolute failure.
Peterson's fame began when he was identified as "defender of free speech" (1:00:11)
More like whiner and defender of traditional values over so called sjw ideology. He cares not for free speech.
**What do you mean by free/what do you mean by speech?**