Hans-Georg Moeller on Reading, Writing, Niklas Luhmann, Jordan Peterson, Carefree Wandering

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 11 бер 2023
  • Please do the following to support me so that I can continue making these videos:
    1️⃣ 🗃 Get my Free 5-Day Zettelkasten Email Course: www.scottscheper.com/free-course
    2️⃣ 📜 Subscribe to a Free 30-day trial of my physical monthly newsletter, The Scott Scheper Letter: www.scottscheper.com/free-trial
    3️⃣ 📚 Get my 594-page Antinet Zettelkasten book for Free (just pay the cost of shipping & materials): www.scottscheper.com/antinet
    The Scott Scheper Letter is the work of art I'm most proud of. It's my labor of love--the thing I invest my heart and soul into every month. It's jam-packed with knowledge that will help you become an independent writer, creator, and thinker.
    Please try out The Scott Scheper Letter! Trust me, you won't regret it.
    Here's the link to the free 30-day trial: www.scottscheper.com/free-trial

КОМЕНТАРІ • 38

  • @aa5new
    @aa5new Рік тому +4

    #1:29:12 “Luhmann is not known for his social theoretical work, his theory of everything, he is known for his Zettelkasten.”

  • @andreipetre7481
    @andreipetre7481 7 місяців тому +1

    Congratulations for the direct questions about reading habits. I would have liked to hear even more details, like number of hours spent reading or the way he underlines.

  • @zainmudassir2964
    @zainmudassir2964 4 місяці тому

    Thanks for introducing Luhman and his media theories. It was eye opening 👁️

  • @massimilianopalma8648
    @massimilianopalma8648 Рік тому

    Thanks Scott, thanks dr. Moeller!

  • @hunched_monk3279
    @hunched_monk3279 11 місяців тому

    Glad I clicked on this link and could hear Georg speak more casually (than normal!). Really great insights into the learning process and his reflection on dialetics, gender identity, etc. Looked up Macau, China afterwards and that’s an interesting place!

  • @productivity6693
    @productivity6693 Рік тому +1

    Can't wait, Scott, my sensei.

  • @nikpanaousis
    @nikpanaousis Рік тому

    Thank you for bringing us Dr. Moeller, Scott. Great interview.

    • @scottscheper
      @scottscheper  Рік тому +1

      Glad you enjoyed it! 👊🗃️✍🏼

  • @productivity6693
    @productivity6693 Рік тому

    Was amazingly interesting. Loved how Mr. Moeller advocated for "Surgical Reading".
    I even e-mailed him afterward.

    • @productivity6693
      @productivity6693 Рік тому

      Thanks for conducting this interview @Scott P. Scheper
      And thanks for attending @Carefree Wandering

  • @krishofstadter
    @krishofstadter Рік тому

    Thanks, this was insightful. Great finish!

  • @carc.sync0
    @carc.sync0 Рік тому +3

    Thank you for the interview, Scott. I would love it if you brought in Markus Krajewski or Johannes Schmidt (from the Luhmann archive) as well 😊

    • @scottscheper
      @scottscheper  Рік тому +1

      😎

    • @Undisciplined
      @Undisciplined Рік тому +2

      Great interview, Hans-Georg is always great. If I may, there is an interview with Johannes (and Hans-Georg too) on my channel. But certainly, Scott could do something delving deeper into the Zettelkasten!

    • @carc.sync0
      @carc.sync0 Рік тому

      @@Undisciplined Thank for you the info. I actually really enjoyed the interview with Johannes Schmidt in your channel! I will check out Hans-Georg's as well.

    • @Liliquan
      @Liliquan 11 місяців тому

      @@Undisciplined Lol, that topic is completely unrelated, has already been covered on many channels and not particularly academically interesting at all.

    • @Undisciplined
      @Undisciplined 11 місяців тому

      @@Liliquan You too, are not particularly academically interesting. But let's let sleeping dogs lie.

  • @zainmudassir2964
    @zainmudassir2964 4 місяці тому

    👍

  • @jgarciajr82
    @jgarciajr82 Рік тому +2

    Hans please talk to John Vervaeke.

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому +1

    Peterson was asked to answers people's questions on Quora. . . which later developed into his two books on Order, then on Chaos. . . (1:01:09)

    • @Liliquan
      @Liliquan 11 місяців тому +4

      Except that the second book wasn't on Chaos at all. Merely a cheap marketing ploy to justify 12 more rules of nonsense.

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому +1

    Peterson also views both as necessary, like Yin and Yang (39:56)

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому

    Sounds similar to Syntopical Reading / Mortimer Adler. (1:12:50)

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому

    This is exactly what Peterson says, regarding order & chaos. (44:20)

  • @dabrupro
    @dabrupro 6 місяців тому

    You are always 50% correct and 50% wrong. -- Sri Baba Ganoush

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому

    This mischaracterizes Peterson; his two popular books are on: 1- Order and 2 - Chaos. (45:26)

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому +1

    Peterson does talk about "good & evil". . . however, he does not make the equivalency: good & evil = order & chaos. (41:40)

    • @scottscheper
      @scottscheper  Рік тому +1

      Interesting; thanks for pointing that out Chris

    • @christopherk222
      @christopherk222 Рік тому

      @@scottscheper Sure ! 🙂

    • @hyperrealhank
      @hyperrealhank 6 місяців тому

      anyone who listens to Peterson unironically is not worth my time

    • @christopherk222
      @christopherk222 6 місяців тому

      @@hyperrealhank 🤣

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому +1

    Peterson's "magnum opus", Maps of Meaning, has nothing to do with self-help. (58:25)

    • @Liliquan
      @Liliquan 11 місяців тому +2

      It may of needed some self help given its absolute failure.

  • @christopherk222
    @christopherk222 Рік тому

    Peterson's fame began when he was identified as "defender of free speech" (1:00:11)

    • @Liliquan
      @Liliquan 11 місяців тому +1

      More like whiner and defender of traditional values over so called sjw ideology. He cares not for free speech.
      **What do you mean by free/what do you mean by speech?**