@academyofideas Title: The Battle for Free Speech in Modern Times In an era where information flows freely across digital networks, the battle over free speech has intensified. Once cherished as a fundamental right in Western societies, freedom of expression now faces formidable challenges. Governments, driven by a desire to protect the "greater good," are increasingly attempting to curtail our ability to speak openly. But what are the implications of this trend? Let's delve into the complexities of censorship and its impact on our society. 1. The Historical Context - Benjamin Franklin, writing under the pseudonym Silence Dogood, aptly stated, "Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech." His words resonate even today. - Throughout history, limits on speech have existed. Property rights allow homeowners to assert their authority-my house, my rules. Common law recognizes speech that threatens others or incites violence as requiring legal sanction. Defamation laws also impose limits. - However, our concern lies not with these basic limits but with the dangers arising from government-led censorship. 2. The Slippery Slope: - Governments argue that controlling speech serves the "greater good." They aim to combat misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech. But where does this lead? - Frederick Douglass warned, "To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the right of the hearer as well as those of the speaker." - John Stuart Mill emphasized that opinions suppressed by authority might still be true. Who decides what's true for all of humanity? 3. Defining Misinformation and Disinformation: - Disinformation intentionally spreads false information to deceive. Misinformation, on the other hand, circulates inaccuracies without malicious intent. - Accusing someone of spreading false ideas requires judgment-a determination of what is true. But who holds this authority? 4. The Existential Threat: - Censoring misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech poses an existential threat to our society. - When governments decide what's permissible, they wield immense power. What if they suppress dissenting voices or unpopular truths? - The road to tyranny begins with silencing free speech. We must tread carefully. 5. Balancing Act: - Striking a balance is crucial. We need safeguards against harmful speech, but we must preserve the essence of free expression. - Vigilance is necessary to prevent censorship from stifling creativity, dissent, and progress. - As citizens, we must defend our right to speak-even when it challenges the status quo. In conclusion, the death of freedom occurs when we allow censorship to thrive unchecked. Let us champion open dialogue, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth. Only then can we safeguard our liberties and ensure a prosperous, free society.
It may be inevitable. The power that is in power, has been in power for a very long time. I think we only have the illusion of freedom, we were given a small window, a small amount of time. But if you look globally, historically, this is no different than any other time. They are trying to divide us as best as possible. If you think your political party is better, you clearly are seeing the problem. It’s much bigger than that.
@riffmondo9733 I read that the word that means "hatred of men" is banned from the comments section, and it automatically gets deleted. I wonder why they consider such a word so damaging to their agenda?
It was a way to introduce you to the existing tyranny, a way to get you used to a adversary narrative so you'll self isolate, otherwise the gman would not let you read it, they still ban books here, free press is an illusion
It is an instruction manual for our CRIMINAL anti-white establishment and they're proud of it. The PROBLEM is they're no where near as powerful as the establishment in that story. White GENOCIDE is not a debate, it is a CRIMINAL charge.
Canada is already of the point of making it illegal to question politicians down to mayors and city councils. They passed a law fining anyone "emotionally harming" politicians in office. For safety of course.
It's rare to have someone whom can stand against a mob of hostile people blocking their paths. Some people even relying on public platforms to survive. Without proper solution against tyrants, we better lay low and wait for a good opportunity.
“Public opinion! I don’t know how sociologists define it, but it seems obvious to me that it can only consist of interacting individual opinions, freely expressed and independent of government or party opinion.” -Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn Brilliant!
"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me" Sticks and Stones" is an English-language children's rhyme. The rhyme is used as a defense against name-calling and verbal bullying, intended to increase resiliency, avoid physical retaliation, and/or to remain calm and indifferent.
Wars have been started over words. To some, the world was created with a word. What you tell yourself has power as well. It seems like words are being underestimated.
@@sunphoenix1231 All you've proven is we have stupid leaders. What you guys don't understand is that other people don't care about your feelings. They are YOUR's, but if you're ignorant enough to let words hurt you then you need to grow up and do what everyone else does, ignore them... but please please don't tell us- nobody gives a shit.
Sticks and Stones" is an English-language children's rhyme. The rhyme is used as a defense against name-calling and verbal bullying, intended to increase resiliency, avoid physical retaliation, and/or to remain calm and indifferent. READ AND LEARN KIDS, First appeared in the 1800's and has endured time for a reason.
Very true. It's fundamentally because people don't know how to think. If average people understood the formal logical fallacies, then they would never take authority as truth in the absence of substantive evidence.
I've heard so many times "and who said that?" or "who are you to say that?" when expressing some things as true. As if truth depends on someone saying it. It's like they want validation of an authority determining it. If someone is to say something first for it to be true, then everything is subjective, which of course, i reject.
@@Matheusss89 Yes, another one I often hear when watching/listening to something is "Who IS this person?". Translation - "has this person even been vetted by the government or other relevant authority?"
Of course, I wrote a paragraph just now about how the government lies, and of course, I got the "returned error" by youtube which means my comment had to be removed because I put a word in it that had to be censored...I posted it on Rumble instead. God, I hate youtube/
Was it a reply? I get the "returned error" message when I reply to a post but the post itself has already been deleted. I have, however, memorized a lengthy list of words which are not allowed. I don't get why they don't just publish the list.
it's a tool of power and control over everything. only one look towards authoritarian countries will be enough to know what western politicians plan for the future.
The tension between free speech, censorship, and the threat of totalitarianism is a fundamental issue that has shaped societies throughout history. Free speech is often regarded as a cornerstone of democratic society, representing the right of individuals to express ideas, criticize the government, and engage in open debate without fear of retribution. It is essential for the health of a democracy, enabling citizens to hold power accountable, advocate for change, and contribute to the collective decision-making process. However, when the balance between free speech and control tilts too far, censorship can take hold, and the risk of totalitarianism increases. Censorship, when used as a tool by governments or powerful institutions, can erode the very foundations of democracy. It is often justified under the guise of maintaining national security, protecting societal values, or preventing the spread of harmful or false information. While some regulations on speech may be necessary to prevent incitement to violence or protect public safety, excessive censorship stifles dissent, limits public discourse, and curtails individual freedom. When governments have the power to control or manipulate information, they can shape narratives, suppress opposing views, and maintain power without accountability. This creates an environment where totalitarian tendencies can flourish, as the populace becomes less able to resist propaganda and more susceptible to authoritarian control. The threat of totalitarianism becomes especially pronounced when censorship is extended to the digital realm. In an age where social media and online platforms play a pivotal role in shaping public opinion, controlling digital speech can have far-reaching consequences. Governments and corporations with significant power over digital information can create echo chambers, limit access to diverse viewpoints, and monitor or suppress speech that challenges the status quo. The rapid spread of misinformation is often cited as a reason for increased censorship, but the real danger lies in the selective enforcement of these measures. When censorship becomes a tool wielded by those in power to silence criticism or undermine dissent, it poses a direct threat to democratic freedoms and individual autonomy. The history of totalitarian regimes has shown that the erosion of free speech is often one of the first steps toward absolute control. By restricting access to information and punishing dissent, these regimes create an atmosphere of fear and conformity. Without the ability to speak freely or access a range of perspectives, people become more vulnerable to manipulation, and society becomes more susceptible to the whims of those who hold power. This is why maintaining the right to free speech is not just about protecting individuals but also about safeguarding the integrity of democratic systems. While the regulation of speech must be carefully balanced to prevent harm, it is crucial to recognize the fine line between necessary oversight and oppressive control. Protecting free speech requires vigilance and the commitment of society to uphold democratic principles, even in the face of challenges such as misinformation and social polarization. True freedom of expression can only thrive in an environment where open debate is encouraged, diverse perspectives are valued, and individuals are empowered to speak without fear of retribution. Preserving these values helps prevent the slide into authoritarianism and ensures that power remains in check, serving the collective good rather than the interests of the few.
Freedoms and morality are connected... we can all stop enabling those who spread Lies and supporting those who share wisdom! Thanks to all involved with Academy of Ideas!
That's why everything is Online......No more face to ugly face... No more breath to bad breath....What a circus these idiots have constructed for us people ..
International crimes against humanity have been committed = 565 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 177 = 6. Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth = 566 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 177 = 6.
Sums Covid up nicely! "Blind belief in Authority!"...to the point where the sheeple would happily let health ignorant Govt bureaucrats and scheming vaccine profiteers put an unproven, experiment substance into their body to do a job their own immune system was already superior at doing. And look at the result. 🤷
You mean belief, not believe, right? I only say this because belief is a thing, a concept whereas believe is a present tense action word and it makes the statement look confusing at first glance. I do agree with Einstein too!
It's happen until society will be based on a hierarchy of power (so colectivism) with the acceptance of a third party authority. If it isn't present no one can take away your freedom since everyone can defend himself in absence of absolute power that make impossible do so.
Julian paid a high price for maintaining his principles, integrity and exercising his freedom to choose his priorities. I respect him for that, and so should others. It is not our place to disagree with his choices.
Thank you for this video! My husband and I are already members. This video alone is a reason to join! Time for more civil disobedience if we do not want totalitarianism. I know I would rather know where I stand with someone than have them whisper behind my back. Free speech let's one know where we stand and who we wish to stand against.
I've said this for years having tuned into social structure and politics in my early adulthood. "keep them fat, dumb and happy and they will eat out of your bowl". Then comes the "wildebeest effect, most all follow one path".
Imagine if the government had the right to force Fredrick Douglas to be silent because it was offensive at the time????? As long as some words can be used then all words must be legal!!
These videos have taught me a lot about totalitarianism and the importance of being aware of our boundaries as civilians. And reminding us and each other to think about those boundaries and uphold them. Though it has been sad to see how far fear will control the people, and how people will even turn against anyone who doesn't comply. The scared people in a society become even scarier than the so called threat they're afraid of.
I'm a nutritional therapist and I refuse to use symbols and different characters in my copy on social media because I believe in freedom of speech. How dare I talk about immunity, vitamins, and natural health remedies. The AMA sees people like me as a threat 🙄
On Reddit, if you go against what is popular, your comment gets buried or removed. In real life, you can't afford to take such gambles, so people either say what is popular or if they are feeling rebellious then nothing. Even if someone makes a stand, they will be "cancelled" fast, or at the very least will make enemies and keep in mind the basis for this divide is not having the same opinion.
@@SamWilkinsonn its worse than that, thats old style their new way (imagine applying Chat-GPT to this) analyses the general meaning checking for if its directed at individuals and orgs. I dont quite know how to describe it but you can say some words in a certain way that in a different way wouldn't show so long as it isn't "personal" and lacks any type of "direct suggestions" that may cause harm to the system
@@starc. 77th? It's not being deleted because it's offensive it's being deleted because it's subversive and it seems there are lots of people who see your evil! Are you worried?
Outstanding work, yet again. Please continue these videos, they are one of a kind in truthfulness and intellectual depth. These videos ring the sounds of prior revolutionary thinkers who’ve resister tightening control of their times, except in a modern way.
Censorship limits how you say things a good example is 1984 “Newspeak”. Thats why you hear people on youtube say “Unalive” so they dont get banned from the censorship.
In order to speak you have to risk offending the person or people you are talking to.. especially when you are speaking about something important and to many people..who should definite hate and who should regulate hate.. compationate narcissists..SJW in campuses are discussing whether freedom of speech should exist or not..speaking your truth is a risk and not speaking your truth is also a risk..risk the backlash which might help you in improving how you think or risk being a coward who never stool up for him or herself..all these censorship causes division..people want to force people to like them - Dr Jordan B Peterson
@@fredgarvinMPyea maybe for idiots like romero 😂. it takes infinitely more energy to accurately communicate than to shut the hell up like a lazy slug. communication is a skill and it needs to be continuously worked on.
00:26 Censoring free speech poses an existential threat to society 02:57 Government censorship of misinformation and disinformation poses challenges in distinguishing truth from deception. 05:33 Censorship by expert arbiters stifles intellectual growth 08:07 Censorship undermines individual dignity and paves the way for totalitarianism. 10:31 Censorship stifles personal autonomy integral to freedom 13:07 Fetishization of words and its impact 15:41 Censorship of hate speech has negative consequences. 18:05 Government censorship can lead to dangerous restrictions on free speech. Crafted by Merlin AI.
One of my fav new book series which touches on censorship and it's dangers is fourth wing/iron flame. It literally has people killing each other, eventually touching on sewing mistrust where the main group knows what's going on but can't speak out without being tortured or killed. They seek to look for primary sources as opposed to "translated" books that were "translated" and censored by the scribes to make it seem like things are okey dokey
The fact that once I say anything slightly political that goes against capitalist society, even though I don't call for violence, nor preach hate against anyone, but does address problems within the system, and open discussion for perhaps practical solutions for said problems, and need to be worried for getting shadowbanned, speaks volumes for me.
No western nation today lives in a purely capitalist society. This to you might sound like a good thing; but it’s not. There’s a direct correlation between the decline of capitalism & the rise of socialism and societal degradation.
As you voice criticism on a video critiquing power structures while the biggest town square on the planet is owned and run by 1 dude who allows everything possible, even CSAM and botting out the ass and absolute degeneracy lol... The censorship nonsense and cancel culture bullshit is no longer trendy.... its not even really happening anymore. Get off the virtue signaling tit and get off your NeoPopulistQon knees
It is admirable and honorable of you to speak directly qnd plainly about all subjects you bring to the public. Thank-you. Continue your good, informative work.
A most timely subject especially as climate mayhem seems to be heating up and melting snowflakes like never before. MendaCity & sensitivity has no limits. Thank goodness for this channels persistence in what it does. Share it broadly especially to those most likely to benefit and perhaps be offended.
No group of people that call themselves believers in a God or a prophet or savior or scriptures have been actively censoring and calling everyone that doesn't believe in there so called moral authority sinner on there way to hell Now suddenly they are crying because they are getting the same treatment they have been perpetrating via violence for thousands of yrs
This is such an ignorant take. Not only are you comparing modern religion with old religion but you are also putting believers in the very same bag as those who have the means to perpetuate whatever agenda they might have. Old religion is more in line with modern state than serving its purpose as a spiritual beacon for the lost. Humans are religious by nature since the act of living is an act of faith. Most need external reinforcement of community and companionship. What sin has a christian committed for living their lives according to the bible when its their leaders who use and twists its meaning to get away with murder?
"I'd rather be robbed by a thief than a congressman. A thief will take my money and go on his way, but a congressman will take it and then bore me with all the reasons he's stealing from me". This is a paraphrasing because I don't remember the exact quote, but I'm pretty sure it was Walter E Williams
Thank you. There is a certain person of note, currently residing in the US and he is an agent of power on the board of The As p en Ins tit ute. Presenting as a drug-addled brat [which he may well be], his power is in his visa status and access to the intel of those who speak truth, allegedly
It rolls down hill from B I S , C F R, Re Insurance from Munich and Switzerland and the top 0.01% backed by the Pen tag on & N ∆ T ∅ and federal law enforcement and local. Truth doesn't need that spin nor muscle but to be free as it mostly definitely hates delay and shall not be stopped by amy army. And so history and experts show, IMHO.
The word in latin is "guberno", and it means to steer, direct, or govern. "Teneo" means to hold back. "Ment" in latin, just means mint. Mind is "mens". I think govern is a greek word, but I never studied greek so idk for sure. Good example of misinformation though.
The points made in this video can be applied to not just the governmental realm. These ideas can be applied to interactions with individuals on a daily basis. You will never be able to get someone with tyrannical tendencies to come around to your ideas, that's a feature of narcissism and doesn't just go away with a debate over a particular issue. Just keep in mind, when debating these types of people every point you make will be considered worthless because the mini tyrant did not come up with it themselves.
Thank you. Im trying to find the courage to stand up to what has become oppressive and abusive actions by my own culture. Maybe its not quite courage i need, but rather the correct frame of expression. ✌️
Support our work, and access 92+ videos exclusive to AOI Members! - academyofideas.com/members/
that C word concept is derived from that F word concept, its not the dea....
Great vid... All seems pretty obvious dont it?
I think you should address one of the core problems in future vids... dependence.
@academyofideas
Title: The Battle for Free Speech in Modern Times
In an era where information flows freely across digital networks, the battle over free speech has intensified. Once cherished as a fundamental right in Western societies, freedom of expression now faces formidable challenges. Governments, driven by a desire to protect the "greater good," are increasingly attempting to curtail our ability to speak openly. But what are the implications of this trend? Let's delve into the complexities of censorship and its impact on our society.
1. The Historical Context
- Benjamin Franklin, writing under the pseudonym Silence Dogood, aptly stated, "Whoever would overthrow the Liberty of a Nation, must begin by subduing the Freeness of Speech." His words resonate even today.
- Throughout history, limits on speech have existed. Property rights allow homeowners to assert their authority-my house, my rules. Common law recognizes speech that threatens others or incites violence as requiring legal sanction. Defamation laws also impose limits.
- However, our concern lies not with these basic limits but with the dangers arising from government-led censorship.
2. The Slippery Slope:
- Governments argue that controlling speech serves the "greater good." They aim to combat misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech. But where does this lead?
- Frederick Douglass warned, "To suppress free speech is a double wrong. It violates the right of the hearer as well as those of the speaker."
- John Stuart Mill emphasized that opinions suppressed by authority might still be true. Who decides what's true for all of humanity?
3. Defining Misinformation and Disinformation:
- Disinformation intentionally spreads false information to deceive. Misinformation, on the other hand, circulates inaccuracies without malicious intent.
- Accusing someone of spreading false ideas requires judgment-a determination of what is true. But who holds this authority?
4. The Existential Threat:
- Censoring misinformation, disinformation, and hate speech poses an existential threat to our society.
- When governments decide what's permissible, they wield immense power. What if they suppress dissenting voices or unpopular truths?
- The road to tyranny begins with silencing free speech. We must tread carefully.
5. Balancing Act:
- Striking a balance is crucial. We need safeguards against harmful speech, but we must preserve the essence of free expression.
- Vigilance is necessary to prevent censorship from stifling creativity, dissent, and progress.
- As citizens, we must defend our right to speak-even when it challenges the status quo.
In conclusion, the death of freedom occurs when we allow censorship to thrive unchecked. Let us champion open dialogue, critical thinking, and the pursuit of truth. Only then can we safeguard our liberties and ensure a prosperous, free society.
Good points. It's like, I admit that i'm stupid, but at least let me explore with my own eyes, don't tell me what to think.
sorry... I think a few Canadians are alright actually
"If freedom of speech is taken away, then dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep to the slaughter."
George Washington
already happening
😅 it's been happening for at least 3 decades kid, did you believe the American Dream fairytale 😅
Free speech is essential = 222 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
Coordinating propaganda = 222 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
Never follow an order = 222 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
Stand alone stand defiant = 222 = 6, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
No other speaks for me = 223 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
Sheep to the slaughter = 232 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
John Fitzgerald Kennedy = 233 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
Capitalist death sentence = 233 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 83 = 11.
The dumb and silent sheep are giving their freedom away!
Covid is a case in point!
I am guessing he was only talking about the 17% of the population that had any rights. He wasn't too worried about the peoples speech who he owned.
We got people so weak and pathetic nowadays they'll happily throw away their freedoms because they're scared of them.
Fear rules idiots!
Break your tv, radio and #trycarnivore
That's not what Mom said... 👹
Specifically, they are petrified by the responsibility which is the flipside of freedom.
It may be inevitable. The power that is in power, has been in power for a very long time. I think we only have the illusion of freedom, we were given a small window, a small amount of time. But if you look globally, historically, this is no different than any other time. They are trying to divide us as best as possible. If you think your political party is better, you clearly are seeing the problem. It’s much bigger than that.
This is why the freedom of Julian Assange isn't a win: he was forced to admit to a crime instead of being freed for freedom of the press.
And pay a huge sum!
Hes dead
Hes a clone and mossad agent amd controlled oppositio. Wake up and look up Donald Marshall
Exactly!! Historic moment of freedom of speech taken down by psychopaths!
I think it's a hail Mary by the left to maintain power.
Lets be honest, he would probably never been freed otherwise.
UA-cam is one of the biggest guilty of this 😂
And yet they allowed this video. We live in insane times.
@@mann8098
Because this video does not threaten them.
@riffmondo9733 I read that the word that means "hatred of men" is banned from the comments section, and it automatically gets deleted. I wonder why they consider such a word so damaging to their agenda?
@@mann8098let’s test that. If I call your message misandrist or reference misandry can you see it?
@@mann8098wtf you are right can you see my other comment
Orwell's 1984 wasn't supposed to be a instruction manual but a warning.
It was a way to introduce you to the existing tyranny, a way to get you used to a adversary narrative so you'll self isolate, otherwise the gman would not let you read it, they still ban books here, free press is an illusion
Orwell was a 33rd degree Freemason. 1984 was a blueprint for what was planned to happen. He has inside knowledge of what was to come.
What if he was describing a system that was already in place when he wrote it and expanded worldwide, including the USA?
It is an instruction manual for our CRIMINAL anti-white establishment and they're proud of it. The PROBLEM is they're no where near as powerful as the establishment in that story. White GENOCIDE is not a debate, it is a CRIMINAL charge.
@@DudleyaSetchellii That's what I've always thought.
Canada is already of the point of making it illegal to question politicians down to mayors and city councils. They passed a law fining anyone "emotionally harming" politicians in office. For safety of course.
I said vak Jastin Truhow...
It was deleted straight away!
Vak U T ube!
😮
@@Sheeesh310 AI bot plague
Canada is a bureaucratic dictatorship that does not acknowledge unalienable rights.
Then it is time for Canadians to start unaliving politicians.
Self censorship is the worst form of tyranny.
It's rare to have someone whom can stand against a mob of hostile people blocking their paths. Some people even relying on public platforms to survive. Without proper solution against tyrants, we better lay low and wait for a good opportunity.
@@dreamingacaciaright, they’re just going to ban us anyway.
@@dreamingacaciatech companies are the tyrant
And the ministry of truth controls youtube
“Public opinion! I don’t know how sociologists define it, but it seems obvious to me that it can only consist of interacting individual opinions, freely expressed and independent of government or party opinion.”
-Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn
Brilliant!
"Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me"
Sticks and Stones" is an English-language children's rhyme. The rhyme is used as a defense against name-calling and verbal bullying, intended to increase resiliency, avoid physical retaliation, and/or to remain calm and indifferent.
The lies of the Patriarchy 😅
Wars have been started over words. To some, the world was created with a word. What you tell yourself has power as well.
It seems like words are being underestimated.
@@fingerprint5511 anyone who says words have hurt has never been punched in the face.
@@sunphoenix1231 All you've proven is we have stupid leaders. What you guys don't understand is that other people don't care about your feelings. They are YOUR's, but if you're ignorant enough to let words hurt you then you need to grow up and do what everyone else does, ignore them... but please please don't tell us- nobody gives a shit.
Sticks and Stones" is an English-language children's rhyme. The rhyme is used as a defense against name-calling and verbal bullying, intended to increase resiliency, avoid physical retaliation, and/or to remain calm and indifferent.
READ AND LEARN KIDS, First appeared in the 1800's and has endured time for a reason.
Many people take authority as their truth. Better to take truth as your authority. I heard that recently.
Very true. It's fundamentally because people don't know how to think. If average people understood the formal logical fallacies, then they would never take authority as truth in the absence of substantive evidence.
I've heard so many times "and who said that?" or "who are you to say that?" when expressing some things as true. As if truth depends on someone saying it. It's like they want validation of an authority determining it. If someone is to say something first for it to be true, then everything is subjective, which of course, i reject.
@@Matheusss89 Yes, another one I often hear when watching/listening to something is "Who IS this person?". Translation - "has this person even been vetted by the government or other relevant authority?"
@@Matheusss89Someone they consider an “expert “ I can’t stand the word anymore
UA-cam will remove this video because it doesn’t believe it’s true.
It's surreal watching it happen over and over. It never stopped.
I tried posting Orwell’s quote to Facebook story, but it got censored until I draw over Orwell’s name - the irony is strong
Unbelievable.
This video made me feel even worse about Facebook. I'm ashamed I still have an account 😭
@@cosmolosysthen delete your account. I did and I am much happier knowing I am not helping them earn money for ruining our country.
People still believe there is free speech in America 😅
no surprise here.
He who sacrifices freedom for security deserve neither
"Those who would sacrifice liberty in the name of security, deserve neither liberty nor security."
- Benjamin Franklin
This is quote folly. Just like the immoral man who said it. Go to a wartorn country and speak this error.
We never needed the government until we accepted the money as payment for debt
It wasn't money,it was an instrument of debt. When you use it you are trafficing in "unlawful" financial transactions.
Wrong.
Of course, I wrote a paragraph just now about how the government lies, and of course, I got the "returned error" by youtube which means my comment had to be removed because I put a word in it that had to be censored...I posted it on Rumble instead. God, I hate youtube/
Ralph E Noel for president of the United States of America
The constitutionalist America needs yesterday 😊😊😊❤
Yes
The PieceAsht People are Running the Show 😠
With THEIR PLANS For TOTAL DESTRUCTION OF EVERYTHING 😡
OBVIOUSLY
Was it a reply? I get the "returned error" message when I reply to a post but the post itself has already been deleted. I have, however, memorized a lengthy list of words which are not allowed. I don't get why they don't just publish the list.
One of your best yet!
Censorship is evil
And the YT censor Nazi's are the worst. They are traitors to the republic. 😜😷😝🤪😵🤠
it's a tool of power and control over everything. only one look towards authoritarian countries will be enough to know what western politicians plan for the future.
He who would acquire fame must not show himself afraid of censure. The dread of censure is the death of genius
The Gulag Archipelago seems more and more pertinent, every day. It’s honestly crazy how insightful it was/is.
Russian students in High School required to read this....
Kolyma Tales is much better. The Gulag Archipelago is a fun read but too much fiction that contradicts the information coming from the Soviet Archives
“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” is a Latin question that translates to “Who will guard the guards themselves?”
Great quote...
Every year 1984 becomes more relevant.
true, but ironically, people on both the left and the right view the other side of being guilty for that being the case.
This is probably the most important video I've watched on UA-cam in years. Share this today.
It's very interesting. What are your thoughts?
limited speech = limited strength
*Good Lord, I love and cherish this channel. Thank you for all you do.*
The tension between free speech, censorship, and the threat of totalitarianism is a fundamental issue that has shaped societies throughout history. Free speech is often regarded as a cornerstone of democratic society, representing the right of individuals to express ideas, criticize the government, and engage in open debate without fear of retribution. It is essential for the health of a democracy, enabling citizens to hold power accountable, advocate for change, and contribute to the collective decision-making process. However, when the balance between free speech and control tilts too far, censorship can take hold, and the risk of totalitarianism increases.
Censorship, when used as a tool by governments or powerful institutions, can erode the very foundations of democracy. It is often justified under the guise of maintaining national security, protecting societal values, or preventing the spread of harmful or false information. While some regulations on speech may be necessary to prevent incitement to violence or protect public safety, excessive censorship stifles dissent, limits public discourse, and curtails individual freedom. When governments have the power to control or manipulate information, they can shape narratives, suppress opposing views, and maintain power without accountability. This creates an environment where totalitarian tendencies can flourish, as the populace becomes less able to resist propaganda and more susceptible to authoritarian control.
The threat of totalitarianism becomes especially pronounced when censorship is extended to the digital realm. In an age where social media and online platforms play a pivotal role in shaping public opinion, controlling digital speech can have far-reaching consequences. Governments and corporations with significant power over digital information can create echo chambers, limit access to diverse viewpoints, and monitor or suppress speech that challenges the status quo. The rapid spread of misinformation is often cited as a reason for increased censorship, but the real danger lies in the selective enforcement of these measures. When censorship becomes a tool wielded by those in power to silence criticism or undermine dissent, it poses a direct threat to democratic freedoms and individual autonomy.
The history of totalitarian regimes has shown that the erosion of free speech is often one of the first steps toward absolute control. By restricting access to information and punishing dissent, these regimes create an atmosphere of fear and conformity. Without the ability to speak freely or access a range of perspectives, people become more vulnerable to manipulation, and society becomes more susceptible to the whims of those who hold power. This is why maintaining the right to free speech is not just about protecting individuals but also about safeguarding the integrity of democratic systems.
While the regulation of speech must be carefully balanced to prevent harm, it is crucial to recognize the fine line between necessary oversight and oppressive control. Protecting free speech requires vigilance and the commitment of society to uphold democratic principles, even in the face of challenges such as misinformation and social polarization. True freedom of expression can only thrive in an environment where open debate is encouraged, diverse perspectives are valued, and individuals are empowered to speak without fear of retribution. Preserving these values helps prevent the slide into authoritarianism and ensures that power remains in check, serving the collective good rather than the interests of the few.
Freedoms and morality are connected... we can all stop enabling those who spread Lies and supporting those who share wisdom! Thanks to all involved with Academy of Ideas!
There is no such thing as “hate speech”; there is only speech.
There is no speech, only words
Anthopologically speaking. There is only action and outcome.
That is correct. It is labeled Hate Speech to give it more power and easier to self to the flock. It’s always about the words.
That's why everything is Online......No more face to ugly face... No more breath to bad breath....What a circus these idiots have constructed for us people ..
Hate speech is protected
'BLIND BELIEVE IN AUTHORITY IS THE GREATEST ENEMY OF TRUTH'
~Albert Einstein~
That's Americans 😅
International crimes against humanity have been committed = 565 = 7, English, In Chaldean = 177 = 6.
Blind belief in authority is the greatest enemy of truth = 566 = 8, English, In Chaldean = 177 = 6.
@@fingerprint5511 Apparently you fail to realize that not all American's have the same core beliefs.
Sums Covid up nicely!
"Blind belief in Authority!"...to the point where the sheeple would happily let health ignorant Govt bureaucrats and scheming vaccine profiteers put an unproven, experiment substance into their body to do a job their own immune system was already superior at doing. And look at the result. 🤷
You mean belief, not believe, right? I only say this because belief is a thing, a concept whereas believe is a present tense action word and it makes the statement look confusing at first glance. I do agree with Einstein too!
George Carlin would be laughing and saying I told you so
The American Dream. You have to be asleep to believe it
Who?
@@Iplayedbarbiegames good god look him up
Orwell isn't laughing
@@Iplayedbarbiegames George Carlin was a 60s and 70s lefty but he became a rebel and he would by today standards be a hard core right wing
Thank you.
Freedom will always be used to destroy freedom. It is up to the free to maintain freedom. If you can't control your mind, someone else will.
It's happen until society will be based on a hierarchy of power (so colectivism) with the acceptance of a third party authority.
If it isn't present no one can take away your freedom since everyone can defend himself in absence of absolute power that make impossible do so.
More like Academy of FACTS!
Julian paid a high price for maintaining his principles, integrity and exercising his freedom to choose his priorities. I respect him for that, and so should others. It is not our place to disagree with his choices.
censorship is very common on this site Y.T.
Thank you for this video! My husband and I are already members. This video alone is a reason to join! Time for more civil disobedience if we do not want totalitarianism. I know I would rather know where I stand with someone than have them whisper behind my back. Free speech let's one know where we stand and who we wish to stand against.
They'll have the masses begging, w ear to ear smiles, for their rights to be stripped
I've said this for years having tuned into social structure and politics in my early adulthood. "keep them fat, dumb and happy and they will eat out of your bowl". Then comes the "wildebeest effect, most all follow one path".
Via poly addiction and functional illiteracy combined with the inability to remember and think critically.
Imagine if the government had the right to force Fredrick Douglas to be silent because it was offensive at the time????? As long as some words can be used then all words must be legal!!
🙏
These videos have taught me a lot about totalitarianism and the importance of being aware of our boundaries as civilians. And reminding us and each other to think about those boundaries and uphold them. Though it has been sad to see how far fear will control the people, and how people will even turn against anyone who doesn't comply. The scared people in a society become even scarier than the so called threat they're afraid of.
Thank You
I'm a nutritional therapist and I refuse to use symbols and different characters in my copy on social media because I believe in freedom of speech.
How dare I talk about immunity, vitamins, and natural health remedies. The AMA sees people like me as a threat 🙄
I stopped dead in my tracks when the horror of a thought struck me: Am I one of the smart ones? Please, God, don’t let it be true.
Amazing work as always. Quite informative
"Censorship is like telling a man he can't eat steak because a baby can't chew"
It's sad. It's already happening. Up to the last thing said in this video. And i feel hopeless that anything will change.
On Reddit, if you go against what is popular, your comment gets buried or removed. In real life, you can't afford to take such gambles, so people either say what is popular or if they are feeling rebellious then nothing. Even if someone makes a stand, they will be "cancelled" fast, or at the very least will make enemies and keep in mind the basis for this divide is not having the same opinion.
It's hard to believe Reddit used to be one of the most pro-free speech platforms back in its early days.
My comment got censored, imagine that.
learn to post in a way so it doesn't
YT’s especially bad for that. Have to be extremely careful with word choice because their bannedwords list is enormous.
Rofl bitchslapped by ministry of truth utube
@@SamWilkinsonn its worse than that, thats old style their new way (imagine applying Chat-GPT to this) analyses the general meaning checking for if its directed at individuals and orgs. I dont quite know how to describe it but you can say some words in a certain way that in a different way wouldn't show so long as it isn't "personal" and lacks any type of "direct suggestions" that may cause harm to the system
@@starc. 77th? It's not being deleted because it's offensive it's being deleted because it's subversive and it seems there are lots of people who see your evil! Are you worried?
Outstanding work, yet again. Please continue these videos, they are one of a kind in truthfulness and intellectual depth. These videos ring the sounds of prior revolutionary thinkers who’ve resister tightening control of their times, except in a modern way.
Censorship limits how you say things a good example is 1984 “Newspeak”. Thats why you hear people on youtube say “Unalive” so they dont get banned from the censorship.
Excellent. You even managed to avoid mentioning the group behind 95% of censorship.
Left. Press.
@@xlerosx J's.
@@xlerosxEhhh! try again
In order to speak you have to risk offending the person or people you are talking to.. especially when you are speaking about something important and to many people..who should definite hate and who should regulate hate.. compationate narcissists..SJW in campuses are discussing whether freedom of speech should exist or not..speaking your truth is a risk and not speaking your truth is also a risk..risk the backlash which might help you in improving how you think or risk being a coward who never stool up for him or herself..all these censorship causes division..people want to force people to like them - Dr Jordan B Peterson
"It takes more energy to keep quiet than it does to speak the mind" -From George Romero's masterpiece "Day of the Dead"
@@fredgarvinMPyea maybe for idiots like romero 😂. it takes infinitely more energy to accurately communicate than to shut the hell up like a lazy slug. communication is a skill and it needs to be continuously worked on.
The proper response to Hate Speech is Love Speech, not Censorship.
We don't see this often enough
That should really be given a wide-scale try
I'm not a fan of the trope 'love is love'
@jillraymond2394 love is good, love is kind and on
Hate speech is an Orwellian term
Let people decide what they wish to, or not wish to hear!
Some people are too weak , they want the govt to control what they see
The spoken work is the least reliable purveyor of truth.
Great as ever
Thank you for presenting this argument
00:26 Censoring free speech poses an existential threat to society
02:57 Government censorship of misinformation and disinformation poses challenges in distinguishing truth from deception.
05:33 Censorship by expert arbiters stifles intellectual growth
08:07 Censorship undermines individual dignity and paves the way for totalitarianism.
10:31 Censorship stifles personal autonomy integral to freedom
13:07 Fetishization of words and its impact
15:41 Censorship of hate speech has negative consequences.
18:05 Government censorship can lead to dangerous restrictions on free speech.
Crafted by Merlin AI.
A victim is an abuser and an abuser is a victim
Iosif Andriasov quote: "Totalitarianism personifies slavery. Totalitarianism expresses its attitude towards citizens as slaves."
Thanks for another informative and thought-provoking video.
One of my fav new book series which touches on censorship and it's dangers is fourth wing/iron flame. It literally has people killing each other, eventually touching on sewing mistrust where the main group knows what's going on but can't speak out without being tortured or killed. They seek to look for primary sources as opposed to "translated" books that were "translated" and censored by the scribes to make it seem like things are okey dokey
…this video should be required viewing for UA-cam
This is the best analysis of freedom of speech and free speech laws I have encountered.
Excellent video.
To silence hate speech we become weak minded and vulnerable to the very hate we are being sheltered from… that is wisdom.
The fact that once I say anything slightly political that goes against capitalist society, even though I don't call for violence, nor preach hate against anyone, but does address problems within the system, and open discussion for perhaps practical solutions for said problems, and need to be worried for getting shadowbanned, speaks volumes for me.
No western nation today lives in a purely capitalist society. This to you might sound like a good thing; but it’s not. There’s a direct correlation between the decline of capitalism & the rise of socialism and societal degradation.
As you voice criticism on a video critiquing power structures while the biggest town square on the planet is owned and run by 1 dude who allows everything possible, even CSAM and botting out the ass and absolute degeneracy lol...
The censorship nonsense and cancel culture bullshit is no longer trendy.... its not even really happening anymore.
Get off the virtue signaling tit and get off your NeoPopulistQon knees
I might as well just not even comment anymore.
It is admirable and honorable of you to speak directly qnd plainly about all subjects you bring to the public. Thank-you. Continue your good, informative work.
Wow, this was great!
I learned the difference between
“Disinformation vs. Misinformation”
And lots more 🤓
A most timely subject especially as climate mayhem seems to be heating up and melting snowflakes like never before.
MendaCity & sensitivity has no limits.
Thank goodness for this channels persistence in what it does.
Share it broadly especially to those most likely to benefit and perhaps be offended.
Excellent video! Nice work!
This is a great video and lesson. This is the content that should go viral
Already know this bouta be a good one this channel saved my life.
As I heard it, Kristall Nacht was a complete surprise to the victims. They didn't see it coming.
Kristalnacht
And you said I was crazy....
You ARE free, to do & say what THEY tell you to, or else you will made an example of, to anyone else who thinks of getting out of line.
And that is why we move forward as ONE
@@cedriccrawford4231 Who decides what is considered forward.
This video was released at an appropriate time.
No group of people that call themselves believers in a God or a prophet or savior or scriptures have been actively censoring and calling everyone that doesn't believe in there so called moral authority sinner on there way to hell
Now suddenly they are crying because they are getting the same treatment they have been perpetrating via violence for thousands of yrs
This is such an ignorant take. Not only are you comparing modern religion with old religion but you are also putting believers in the very same bag as those who have the means to perpetuate whatever agenda they might have. Old religion is more in line with modern state than serving its purpose as a spiritual beacon for the lost. Humans are religious by nature since the act of living is an act of faith. Most need external reinforcement of community and companionship. What sin has a christian committed for living their lives according to the bible when its their leaders who use and twists its meaning to get away with murder?
Silencing your opposition does not prove you right or them wrong It is simply a means of control.
oh man!!! always a good day when we see an Academy of Idea's post!!! love all that u do! keep crushing, Crusher
BRILLIANT! One of AOI's best.
Thanks for all that you do, AOI.
UA-cam has gotten out of hand. I thought the opposition was the enemy. I see now who it really is.
"I'd rather be robbed by a thief than a congressman. A thief will take my money and go on his way, but a congressman will take it and then bore me with all the reasons he's stealing from me". This is a paraphrasing because I don't remember the exact quote, but I'm pretty sure it was Walter E Williams
Censorship + lies = modernism.
Thank you. There is a certain person of note, currently residing in the US and he is an agent of power on the board of The As p en Ins tit ute. Presenting as a drug-addled brat [which he may well be], his power is in his visa status and access to the intel of those who speak truth, allegedly
It rolls down hill from B I S , C F R, Re Insurance from Munich and Switzerland and the top 0.01% backed by the Pen tag on & N ∆ T ∅ and federal law enforcement and local.
Truth doesn't need that spin nor muscle but to be free as it mostly definitely hates delay and shall not be stopped by amy army.
And so history and experts show, IMHO.
THERE ARE FOUR LIGHTS !
Excellent work. Thank you
“To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.” Kevin Strom.
I get cut off from speaking to my parents every day and every night.
Great video! I'm liking the longer videos🔥
Govern= control or hold back. Ment= your mind. From the Latin.
The word in latin is "guberno", and it means to steer, direct, or govern. "Teneo" means to hold back. "Ment" in latin, just means mint. Mind is "mens". I think govern is a greek word, but I never studied greek so idk for sure. Good example of misinformation though.
The points made in this video can be applied to not just the governmental realm. These ideas can be applied to interactions with individuals on a daily basis. You will never be able to get someone with tyrannical tendencies to come around to your ideas, that's a feature of narcissism and doesn't just go away with a debate over a particular issue. Just keep in mind, when debating these types of people every point you make will be considered worthless because the mini tyrant did not come up with it themselves.
Thank you. Im trying to find the courage to stand up to what has become oppressive and abusive actions by my own culture. Maybe its not quite courage i need, but rather the correct frame of expression. ✌️
Superb!
I have never seen such an easy to understand and effective narration. ☺
💎🏆 Great insightful & fruitful video 🏆💎