I would call it (artillery) the meat grinder. There are no real king in todays war. All pieces are dependants for further manoeuvres. Artillery can be spotted from air to ground. And there are radar against artillery operations to counter by other artillery barrages, plus aircraft watchers. I play Arma 2 - 3 at this level. haha no needs to go in war colleges to learn this.
I had two Argentinian artillery rounds land 5 to 10 meters away from me. We had the GPMG broken down for a good clean when the first round stuck ground. It buried itself into the soft peat ground and exploded resulting in a massive crater. Not wanting to hang around we grabbed what we could and started moving to other cover just as the 2nd round struck. This time it hit solid ground and we took a casualty, who was seriously injured but survived. That was the closest I ever wanted to get to enemy arty fire!!
In 1991 we had Iraqi 152mm's land so close to us I replied "I think one of my filings came loose". The loud crack and heat from an incoming round that lands close is incredible. Ironically I have scars on the right side of my neck from an IED blast in Feb 2006 that was made out of COMBLOCK 152mm round! As an American I'm no longer enthusiastic about fireworks on the 4th of July.
I was in YPG from mid 2016 to late 2017. Was shelled by an ISIS T55 tank. Second time in my life, actually, was also in Croatia in ZNG in 1991. I remember this time the shell hit some trees about 100 meters in front of me. Quite close enough. Horrifying damage to the trees, thank god we had only just started moving forward. No warning , just this huge, flat Bang. It was indirect fire, of course, they use the tanks the same way as the kurds do, they just use them as guns and don't even stay inside when they fire.
these old training films are an absolute fucking MUST for those members of Forces '80, a re-enactment group who portray the armed forces between 1978 and 1989. If these were available on DVD and on sale in army surplus shops, they'd make an absolute fucking KILLING - they'd sell like red hot cakes!
I remember watching this during basic training at Woolwich in 89....doing my best to keep my eyes open after along day running around. 101 Fld Reg 201 Bat.
I can imagine the memories are not all good. I was a teenager during the 80s. It was a constant thing in the back of my mind that the shit could hit the fan and it wouldn't be a long time before it got out of control. Thanks for your service brother.
haunting moment 6:05 when squad commander calls his men for verbal check in after an artillery bombardment. Yells the name, the men reply, except for silence after one man's name...
In life some of them will be duff. So it's a nice procedure in course/class but not in life battle. The check will be done at very last moment or just at the end. The haunting moment will start once the next squad would had taken the line ((if possible)).
therichardking, check out the battle of "Seelow Heights" from WW2, when Russia crossed into east Germany and the massive arty fight that occurred to try and stop the Red Army from reaching Berlin. Surviving German's from the Battle of the Bulge that fought at Seelow Heights said it was much more intense at Seelow than it was in the Ardenne in regards to artillery.
***** No, the fact is Zhukov amassed artillery of 16,934 guns and mortars with some 7 000 000 shell's for the start of the operation not counting tank's and plane's.
Alaskan Mandingo 13B to be and I heard 13D does the math so I better not be getting no equations in AIT. Wanted 11B wasn't no openings so I told the recruiter fuck it just give me a combat MOS just hoping I don't lose my hearing before I can change my MOS you know some things wrong when the physical profile let's you score a 2 on the hearing test
Artillary here myself, 82nd airborne 3rd battalion 321st FAR 18th feild artillary brigade , Desert Storm vet. On the night, or shall i day morning of the invasion we fired our 155s for 3hrs straight and i would have hated to be on the recieving end of what we dished out that morning,
I remember when our group commander, gave his going away speech, the last part of it was, The sound of the big guns is like music to an artillery mans ears. In those days we did not have ear protection, So a lot of us were all having hearing problems and when my MOS was changed and I became a CW Oper. it got worse and I know have a hearing aid, that works good enough but my tinnitus still interferes with my hearing. No more music. for me.
Great clip, I remember having to watch this years ago, we use to note all the different accents and how the officers sounded different to the soldiers.
Filmed in BAOR 1975/76. Disgruntled, as we were called out at 4am, to go and shoot this damn Training. Remember it well. First time I have seen it since?
It's an British Army Training film from the 70's based on the then Cold War war scenario of how us gallant Brits would fend off Ivan. The SKC then SSVC made shed loads of films I have only uploaded a tiny fraction of the films they made, I sadly don't have any more. This one was one of those for information type films more than actually learning anything. Usually shown when you're chinstrapped during training as a test of not falling asleep.
Beeblebrox One those bloody commies just don’t get how important afternoon tea is to a junior officer, how can he command men with chapped lips?! Terribly selfish of them!
The infantry sound like North Yorkshire/Middleborough accents. I think that the local infantry regiment for that part of England was the Green Howards (Queen Alexandra's?) But I think it is now amalgamated into the new Yorkshire Regiment which has 1st/2nd/3rd battalions and 4th (V) TA battalion.
It's often forgotten that because the advance inland from the invasion beaches after D-day was bogged down within a few miles of the coast for weeks the Allies had the support of massive naval guns ranging all the way up to 14". I cannot imagine how far the effective range of modern artillery has been extended by GPS and drones. And when one adds in the fact that long range gunships will be able to add their firepower to counter battery fire, the kill zone created by the work of the opposing forces artillery and anti artillery units will be vast.
As of my enlistment in the early 2000's, FIST (fire support team) did not have access to naval gunfire anymore. It is probably more and more uncommon to have such large guns on naval ships these days. I know as of then artillery could go upwards of 30 miles (rocket assist round) and I believe non rocket assist rounds could go upward of 20-24 miles, my estimation (bad memory :D). I'd like to see vid's of those improved munitions with anti tank or anti personnel mines, which I have never seen anywhere except when I was selecting my 13F MOS.
The US Army back in the late 80s conducted a test at Fort Sill, OK on a simulated company team replicating Soviet artillery tactics. Actual M1 Abrams M2/3 M Bradleys,, plywood "soldiers", bunkers, trenches, fox holes etc were used in the test. Soviet artillery would absolutely TRASH a unit. The M1s and Bradleys probably wouldn't have had a chance to pull out and re position. It would have been a mess.
Most Russian tanks are junk! And we have plenty hand held 1 man rocket launchers. The days of mass tank battles are gone, and our apaches and drones are tank killers not to mention the brimstone.
BulletproofKam That’s what everyone said when missiles first showed up...”The days of dogfights are over! Planes don’t need guns anymore!” Battle plans are great until the first shots are fired, and we find out the bad guys won’t just roll over and play dead as per plan.
So...kids, this is why you go to University/College, and let the old generals and politicians go fight each other like this. *don't be a fool. It's not worth getting killed to fight for the safety or security of a couple hundred meters of dirt.*
Anyone have a clue when this was made? They are using the DPM camo which was first generally used in 1968 as a full combat uniform. So it is probably at least that old.
Many videos were first made in the 70s, when it became a hype. It was believed that such videos could prepare recruits better and closer to reality. In my own time (early 90s) we have been shown several videos, mainly regarding weapons effects and how to utilize, but command structure too. This is probably the reason why the shout out got so much emphasis in this video.
Incorrect. Active armor (combined with reactive armor) have swung the balance back in favor of tanks like the T-90, which "are largely invulnerable to anti-tank missiles” - retired General Wesley Clark, NATO commander, 1997 to 2000. www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/moscow-pentagon-us-secret-study-213811?o=0 Also MAD is still very much in effect. Its arguably the only reason why Putin hasn't tried annexing former Soviet states like Latvia who are now covered by NATO article 5. Your comment reveals a staggering level of naivety when it comes to modern anti-tank and nuclear capabilities (hypersonic missiles have been developed to counter traditional anti-missile technologies).
+D3cyTH3r A former general trolling on UA-cam!? Not even my parents watch or use it. Do you have a Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat or Tinder account? Well, here it goes....I'm giving you, "The former general of NATO", the finger. What are you going to do? Nuke me?
Bling Bling Good man, he sounds like a dick anyway. I was just using his quote to back up my point about the latest MBT's being immune to TOW missiles.
lecturer09 we had nuclear bombers flying around day and night just in case Russia would of took the biggest dick of their life with the fuckin we would of gave them
@@mkrump9403 No, its the name of a two short and medium range tactical nuclear missles deployed by NATO from 1962 to 1991. Deployment of The Pershing 1a was arguably responsible for the Cuban Missile Crisis as the Soviets responded to short ranged nuclear missiles being deployed on their border by sending their own to cuba.
To Liverpool Scottish Its my understanding that the German Wermacht invaded the Soviet Union on 22/06/1941 with over 3 million well equipped, Battle hardened troops in three army Groups. In encirclement battles at Bryansk and Kiev they took 750,000 prisoners each time. within three years they were crushed in smouldering Berlin by the combined weight of 4 Soviet Army Groups with over 200 divisions and 400 field guns per mile. I don't see BAOR being able to resist an onslaught like that.... Major General 'armchair'.
Regarding Most of the comments from the video: Oh what a Weird World We Live in, Full of Weird Weirdos. Well now isn't that special. Effing weird may an. Right?Right? Toot alew.
I am from the US.......I think going to the M16 type 5.56 rifle was a mistake....... the FAL in an intermediate caliber like it was intended would have been superb for all sides......more reliable, less parts....etc......I guess the US pressured NATO to go with the Colt.......maybe the generals didn't like the idea of a Belgian gun?
@@bmphil3400 our weapon was the FNC, successor to the FAL. And also 5.56 mm. 3 reasons were given: more ammo for the same weight, nato standard and the 5.56 has a corkscrew flightpath, causing larger injuries than the straight shooting 7.62mm. But the FNC was inferior in build quality compared to the FAL.
These old videos are amazing to watch. Love it
Do you have any links for these?
Artillery is still king on the battlefield, 80% casualties from indirect fire in Ukraine i read in a rapport
Your video are pretty amazing too ;)
I would call it (artillery) the meat grinder. There are no real king in todays war. All pieces are dependants for further manoeuvres. Artillery can be spotted from air to ground. And there are radar against artillery operations to counter by other artillery barrages, plus aircraft watchers.
I play Arma 2 - 3 at this level. haha no needs to go in war colleges to learn this.
I agree with you, but for me I think the world war 2 footages gives more impact (whether practice or field footages). I don't know why
if they made this film now the uk defence budget would be blown
how do you pay for it then?
calm down you fucking tool its the intenett not a fucking debating team you sad muppet
@ fuzz zeballs - yeah, because your pathetic little attempt at at irony should pass without comment, right???
fuzz zeballs Outstanding !!!
do you want to stroke me then?
I had two Argentinian artillery rounds land 5 to 10 meters away from me. We had the GPMG broken down for a good clean when the first round stuck ground. It buried itself into the soft peat ground and exploded resulting in a massive crater. Not wanting to hang around we grabbed what we could and started moving to other cover just as the 2nd round struck. This time it hit solid ground and we took a casualty, who was seriously injured but survived. That was the closest I ever wanted to get to enemy arty fire!!
Thanks for what you boys did, it must have been bloody terrifying; even reading about it chilled me to the bones.
In 1991 we had Iraqi 152mm's land so close to us I replied "I think one of my filings came loose". The loud crack and heat from an incoming round that lands close is incredible. Ironically I have scars on the right side of my neck from an IED blast in Feb 2006 that was made out of COMBLOCK 152mm round! As an American I'm no longer enthusiastic about fireworks on the 4th of July.
@David Pryor no. The casualty was seriously injured,..but survived.
I was in YPG from mid 2016 to late 2017. Was shelled by an ISIS T55 tank. Second time in my life, actually, was also in Croatia in ZNG in 1991. I remember this time the shell hit some trees about 100 meters in front of me. Quite close enough. Horrifying damage to the trees, thank god we had only just started moving forward. No warning , just this huge, flat Bang. It was indirect fire, of course, they use the tanks the same way as the kurds do, they just use them as guns and don't even stay inside when they fire.
The Ruski’s could never hope to defeat an army with such manly tashes
😂
Well it was the same army at Sevastopol, & they didn’t!
Umm, I said THREE rounds Ian.... 🙄
Well I think we’ve all seen just how incompetent the Russian army is in the Ukraine…barring their nukes, they really aren’t all that powerfull
They can’t even defeat a bunch of Ukrainian neighbourhood watch with ATGMs.
God fights on the side with the best artillery
- Napoleon
these old training films are an absolute fucking MUST for those members of Forces '80, a re-enactment group who portray the armed forces between 1978 and 1989. If these were available on DVD and on sale in army surplus shops, they'd make an absolute fucking KILLING - they'd sell like red hot cakes!
I remember watching this during basic training at Woolwich in 89....doing my best to keep my eyes open after along day running around. 101 Fld Reg 201 Bat.
I was in this as a young private soldier in West Germany. How this takes me back!
I can imagine the memories are not all good. I was a teenager during the 80s. It was a constant thing in the back of my mind that the shit could hit the fan and it wouldn't be a long time before it got out of control.
Thanks for your service brother.
Which one were you
I'm glad you survived the Soviet onslaught mate! lol :)
@@liverpoolscottish6430 seems quite reasonable now....
haunting moment 6:05 when squad commander calls his men for verbal check in after an artillery bombardment. Yells the name, the men reply, except for silence after one man's name...
In life some of them will be duff. So it's a nice procedure in course/class but not in life battle. The check will be done at very last moment or just at the end. The haunting moment will start once the next squad would had taken the line ((if possible)).
Defo the most polite army in the world.
Division artillery firing some 150 rounds a minute? 72 guns firing about 6 rounds a minute comes up to 432. Yes I was in the artillery.
therichardking, check out the battle of "Seelow Heights" from WW2, when Russia crossed into east Germany and the massive arty fight that occurred to try and stop the Red Army from reaching Berlin.
Surviving German's from the Battle of the Bulge that fought at Seelow Heights said it was much more intense at Seelow than it was in the Ardenne in regards to artillery.
***** No, the fact is Zhukov amassed artillery of 16,934 guns and mortars with some 7 000 000 shell's for the start of the operation not counting tank's and plane's.
***** Thanks Scott, I appreciate the information. Cheers.
Alaskan Mandingo 13B to be and I heard 13D does the math so I better not be getting no equations in AIT. Wanted 11B wasn't no openings so I told the recruiter fuck it just give me a combat MOS just hoping I don't lose my hearing before I can change my MOS you know some things wrong when the physical profile let's you score a 2 on the hearing test
Artillary here myself, 82nd airborne 3rd battalion 321st FAR 18th feild artillary brigade , Desert Storm vet. On the night, or shall i day morning of the invasion we fired our 155s for 3hrs straight and i would have hated to be on the recieving end of what we dished out that morning,
i almost cried, so very BEAUTIFUL!!
I remember when our group commander, gave his going away speech, the last part of it was, The sound of the big guns is like music to an artillery mans ears. In those days we did not have ear protection, So a lot of us were all having hearing problems and when my MOS was changed and I became a CW Oper. it got worse and I know have a hearing aid, that works good enough but my tinnitus still interferes with my hearing. No more music. for me.
eogg25 we still don't have hearing protection unless your talking about training then yea we get some ear plugs doesn't do shit though
What?
Artillery is has terrifying physical effects but I'm more scared with it's psychological effects.
Good God...we got this as a training film in the New Zealand Army in the mid 80's!
Thats cause your awesome ted
..thank goodness nobody else had to watch it, maybe just School of Gun's courses..
Great clip, I remember having to watch this years ago, we use to note all the different accents and how the officers sounded different to the soldiers.
Filmed in BAOR 1975/76. Disgruntled, as we were called out at 4am, to go and shoot this damn Training. Remember it well. First time I have seen it since?
Great stuff. Better than any war movie imo.
That’s one in the eye for Ivan, eh chaps?
Yes, bally Ruskies!
05:13 - wiggling the branche in front of the camera - lol
It's an British Army Training film from the 70's based on the then Cold War war scenario of how us gallant Brits would fend off Ivan. The SKC then SSVC made shed loads of films I have only uploaded a tiny fraction of the films they made, I sadly don't have any more. This one was one of those for information type films more than actually learning anything. Usually shown when you're chinstrapped during training as a test of not falling asleep.
smp220700
Thanks for these mate, brilliant bits of history.
Sick. But Also... Se how this shit's relevent now?
My dad was RA and bought this home for me when I was just a kid. Watched it so many times :) Practically know the lines word for word.
That's going to interfere with tea. Very rude.
Beeblebrox One those bloody commies just don’t get how important afternoon tea is to a junior officer, how can he command men with chapped lips?! Terribly selfish of them!
The infantry sound like North Yorkshire/Middleborough accents. I think that the local infantry regiment for that part of England was the Green Howards (Queen Alexandra's?) But I think it is now amalgamated into the new Yorkshire Regiment which has 1st/2nd/3rd battalions and 4th (V) TA battalion.
This is pretty dangerous. Some idiots may even start to calculate that war might be fun.
+bandwagon22 funny stuff :P
+bandwagon22 It's all fun and games until the bullets start flying in your direction.
SuperElite27000000 and then they go crazy and shit their pant...,hahahaha...
This is a really useful video to teach FOOs.
It's often forgotten that because the advance inland from the invasion beaches after D-day was bogged down within a few miles of the coast for weeks the Allies had the support of massive naval guns ranging all the way up to 14". I cannot imagine how far the effective range of modern artillery has been extended by GPS and drones. And when one adds in the fact that long range gunships will be able to add their firepower to counter battery fire, the kill zone created by the work of the opposing forces artillery and anti artillery units will be vast.
As of my enlistment in the early 2000's, FIST (fire support team) did not have access to naval gunfire anymore. It is probably more and more uncommon to have such large guns on naval ships these days. I know as of then artillery could go upwards of 30 miles (rocket assist round) and I believe non rocket assist rounds could go upward of 20-24 miles, my estimation (bad memory :D).
I'd like to see vid's of those improved munitions with anti tank or anti personnel mines, which I have never seen anywhere except when I was selecting my 13F MOS.
Effects of Artillery Fire: Loud noises, stuff blown up... stuff broken.
Great video
If you get hit with artillery shells, it's a big ouch!
4:19 Looks like Tim the Enchanter is having a field day!
Hey! I saw this 13F AIT back in 86!
11.16 "The attack has been halted......." Meanwhile, back in reality......
explains perfectly the need for the rest of the Commonwealth to assist in defence
This made me flashback to the day i watched platoon for the first time...
5:12 was someone moving thst bush by hand to add drama? Lol
“End of Mission. Nuns withdrawing, school bus out of action...”
Artillery. The King of Battles.
very informative lesson .....
The US Army back in the late 80s conducted a test at Fort Sill, OK on a simulated company team replicating Soviet artillery tactics. Actual M1 Abrams M2/3 M Bradleys,, plywood "soldiers", bunkers, trenches, fox holes etc were used in the test. Soviet artillery would absolutely TRASH a unit. The M1s and Bradleys probably wouldn't have had a chance to pull out and re position. It would have been a mess.
12:25 Unless they use thermobaric's, or cluster munitions, or incendiaries.......
5:15 they are waving with branches in front of the camera for extra drama🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You know this was made when the budget was better than now
The UK now has 300 active tanks. That’s it. They will need a lot of artillery to take on Russia’s 9,000 to 12,000 tanks.
Most Russian tanks are junk! And we have plenty hand held 1 man rocket launchers. The days of mass tank battles are gone, and our apaches and drones are tank killers not to mention the brimstone.
Yeah I would be more worried about London invading the rest of England than Russia. Admiral Ackbar!
One Satan & UK is a quarry, what in the fuck are you morons bleating about, tanks, they'll be coffins.
BulletproofKam That’s what everyone said when missiles first showed up...”The days of dogfights are over! Planes don’t need guns anymore!”
Battle plans are great until the first shots are fired, and we find out the bad guys won’t just roll over and play dead as per plan.
The 12000 tanks are in reserve. The russian military has 2500 MBTs in active service.
Badass movie so old school
It pisses them off when you delay tea
Gotta love us brits being calm as fuck 👍
Plus if they want to win everytime have three extra Brigades worth of GS US Artillery as in Desert Storm.
ADJUST FIRE ! ADJUST FIRE!
Always give way to artillery
How lucky for the british that the russians always walk upright without firing while attacking.
@7:34 did someone spill a dish of rigatoni and tomato sauce on that guys face?
The sappers are leading the way.
What regiment where you in ?
tbh most jocks were pissed when I was in the army.
whatever you do... dont lose your head
artilery is devastating if one makes effective use of rec/ops.
what year is this set in?
War is hell...
When was this film made?
Was that during "The Troubles?"😆
Great depiction of Forward Observance!!
2:05 I'm a bit dissapointed they didn't actually blow up the bridge, at least for dramatic effect?
Is that Piers Morgan playing the Colonel?
STOCK FOOTAGE war fulDA GAP BOOGIE
So...kids, this is why you go to University/College, and let the old generals and politicians go fight each other like this.
*don't be a fool. It's not worth getting killed to fight for the safety or security of a couple hundred meters of dirt.*
Ate a little too much ramen and feel a little nauseated
TL:DW - Getting shelled sucks.
Interesting the Reds didn't drop HE, frag, and Chemical shells all at once. That mix would've been a nightmare to deal with.
They would have but not a good idea to really lower the lads moral before the fight.
10:03 Why the soviets are marching like that to attack? That tatic was real in Soviet Infantry?
love german leopard 1 enemy tanks
they were Cheiftains with the side skirts taken off and the thermal barrel cover removed!
Well, where's the tea? Jolly fellow?
Narrator Sounds like Stan's dad from American dad...
Anyone have a clue when this was made? They are using the DPM camo which was first generally used in 1968 as a full combat uniform. So it is probably at least that old.
Many videos were first made in the 70s, when it became a hype. It was believed that such videos could prepare recruits better and closer to reality. In my own time (early 90s) we have been shown several videos, mainly regarding weapons effects and how to utilize, but command structure too. This is probably the reason why the shout out got so much emphasis in this video.
It might very well have been made in the 70's. Considering the kit it was at least made after '68. Oh, yes. The shout out is important. Thanks Jan.
The camo changed in 85 to the 85 Pattern camo, so i reckon any time between 68-85. My guess would be late 70s.
The TOW missile and others ended massed mechanized warfare as well as MAD.
Incorrect. Active armor (combined with reactive armor) have swung the balance back in favor of tanks like the T-90, which "are largely invulnerable to anti-tank missiles” - retired General Wesley Clark, NATO commander, 1997 to 2000.
www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/04/moscow-pentagon-us-secret-study-213811?o=0
Also MAD is still very much in effect. Its arguably the only reason why Putin hasn't tried annexing former Soviet states like Latvia who are now covered by NATO article 5.
Your comment reveals a staggering level of naivety when it comes to modern anti-tank and nuclear capabilities (hypersonic missiles have been developed to counter traditional anti-missile technologies).
+D3cyTH3r A former general trolling on UA-cam!? Not even my parents watch or use it. Do you have a Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat or Tinder account? Well, here it goes....I'm giving you, "The former general of NATO", the finger. What are you going to do? Nuke me?
Bling Bling Good man, he sounds like a dick anyway. I was just using his quote to back up my point about the latest MBT's being immune to TOW missiles.
5:13 look at the tree
Budget for special effects was blown...
Ehehe hew hew hewhewehe
7:34 frank sidebottom
No declaration of war, but they allowed the British soldiers to get into position before crossing the border.
The Soviets would have blown them away in about 10 minutes with superior fire power and sheer weight of numbers.
Yeah
My fun part is The soviets massive units would had been spotted long before they could shot a single round.
lecturer09 we had nuclear bombers flying around day and night just in case Russia would of took the biggest dick of their life with the fuckin we would of gave them
That is why NATO had tactical nuclear weapons and Pershing 2 missiles.
Pershing? Is it a word from your individual dictionary?
@@mkrump9403 No, its the name of a two short and medium range tactical nuclear missles deployed by NATO from 1962 to 1991. Deployment of The Pershing 1a was arguably responsible for the Cuban Missile Crisis as the Soviets responded to short ranged nuclear missiles being deployed on their border by sending their own to cuba.
Don't come between a brit and his brew 🇬🇧🇬🇧
Needs the Benny Hill music.
g p mg !
2:41 Digicam face paint before it was invented.
Its in sweden
Ooo Errr.........RMP, did 3 years in the Inf TA after regular service however, hence all the warry vids, not ones about taking drugs.
Hi there
To Liverpool Scottish
Its my understanding that the German Wermacht invaded the Soviet Union on 22/06/1941 with over 3 million well equipped, Battle hardened troops in three army Groups. In encirclement battles at Bryansk and Kiev they took 750,000 prisoners each time. within three years they were crushed in smouldering Berlin by the combined weight of 4 Soviet Army Groups with over 200 divisions and 400 field guns per mile. I don't see BAOR being able to resist an onslaught like that....
Major General 'armchair'.
Ian Jarrett They were not there to stop,only to slow and degrade.
I wonder if the original Terminator movies were inspired by this. Look at the Russians marching forward through the barrage.
04.18, 04.51, 04.55, 05.45, 05.58, 06.02 all look quite poorly to me and its not looking to good for Tom at 06.17.
Regarding Most of the comments from the video: Oh what a Weird World We Live in, Full of Weird Weirdos. Well now isn't that special. Effing weird may an. Right?Right? Toot alew.
British Bollywood
Remember what the reds did in Germany no mercy or quarter will be given
They don't make war movies like they used to/
NONCIE gunner oc pilot gloves %100 ally kit
is this real??
Come on, stop fooling around...............................
Это когда такой бой был?Мы ж вроде с англичанами с Крымской войны не воевали....
Only trolls want to sit in a grave waiting to be killed.
Saw this video in my regiment, 6th Artillery, Soest, 1990. I was a FAO. I see the chaps have FALS on them.
I am from the US.......I think going to the M16 type 5.56 rifle was a mistake....... the FAL in an intermediate caliber like it was intended would have been superb for all sides......more reliable, less parts....etc......I guess the US pressured NATO to go with the Colt.......maybe the generals didn't like the idea of a Belgian gun?
@@bmphil3400 our weapon was the FNC, successor to the FAL. And also 5.56 mm. 3 reasons were given: more ammo for the same weight, nato standard and the 5.56 has a corkscrew flightpath, causing larger injuries than the straight shooting 7.62mm. But the FNC was inferior in build quality compared to the FAL.
Y'all know this is not real right?
It's an alternative true. haha
M Krump , that's Donald Trump's reality: alternative facts.
Yeah Russian informed me about his strategy. haha kidding...
Really. Fuck I thought we had ww3 in the 80s. Thanks for letting me know.
@@harryb8945 Yes, these films were made back when the news was real not fake!
They stoped the russains and suffed no casualties...LOLLLLLLL
fail cammo in face:)
And wait for the Americans to save you....
Never should of been there..should of let Germany win.