1500 km/s is not MACH 2.5. 1 mach = 1235 km/h. Per hour, not second. You are only serveral thousand times off. Star can not by any chance 60 times larger than our galaxy, because even if it was meant as volume, still it will be around 400,000 light years in the largest dimension. There will be no connection between core and borders of such star. The biggest star in the universe (that we know of), UY Scuti is a variable hypergiant with a radius around 1,700 times larger than the radius of the sun. And that is around 50 light hours - not 400,000 light years. I have not heard the name of star, how far from us it should be, nothing. I sugest to not lie, or at least show some real data about matter.
You should have said Shockwaves 60 times larger than the Milky Way , it's shockwave's that have been registered from a cosmic explosion millions of years ago not a Star and secondley a Star cannot be 60 times larger than the Milky Way
the clickbait in this video goes crazy 💀
cern is a european organization for nuclear research....... they dont detect stars lol
1500 km/s is not MACH 2.5. 1 mach = 1235 km/h. Per hour, not second. You are only serveral thousand times off. Star can not by any chance 60 times larger than our galaxy, because even if it was meant as volume, still it will be around 400,000 light years in the largest dimension. There will be no connection between core and borders of such star. The biggest star in the universe (that we know of), UY Scuti is a variable hypergiant with a radius around 1,700 times larger than the radius of the sun. And that is around 50 light hours - not 400,000 light years. I have not heard the name of star, how far from us it should be, nothing. I sugest to not lie, or at least show some real data about matter.
Bingo! Well stated. CERN "detected" it? WOW! And all this time I thought that it was a particle accelerator instead of a telescope...lol
This stinks like a feed lot in summer.
You should have said Shockwaves 60 times larger than the Milky Way , it's shockwave's that have been registered from a cosmic explosion millions of years ago not a Star and secondley a Star cannot be 60 times larger than the Milky Way
why not this is bs mind but why we on it why not .
sigh....what sort of shit is this?
MAKE SURE AND SMASH THAT UNSUBSCRIBE BUTTON FOR OUR COMPOST WORLD CHANNEL
A star that is 60 times bigger than a galaxy?
Temu Graham Hancock 😂
that is impossible
Haha, Cern discovers a star.... yeah sure
And 60 times the milky way....ofcourse.
Just imagine the gravity inside such a star.
Bloooooock
Hehehehehehe. This have to be the joke of the year. It will keep me laughing for some time.
All lies, don`t bother watching thumbs down!
Lies, lies all lies...
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
full of bs
sure sure. Start biggest 60 times then galaxy. This channel "cosmos world" is just living in stupid sci-fy.
This is a joke channel