I bet they needed a change of pants! At first I saw one guy standing almost directly under it.. I bet he won't do that again. Glad it was low when it broke and that everyone is OK.
i don't think he did. he walked closer to the camera. not sure of course, just guessing based on where he walks on the deck and where the front wheel landed
If y'all notice, at 1:38 a bird lands on the rear left tire and the added weight made the chains fail. They forgot to factor in the bird's weight just in case one did land on the dump truck. Also, they are in the Southern Hemisphere, things weigh a little more down under. So obvious.
Chain slings failed simple as that. Probably weren't inspected prior and it is very possible that they were not rated to pick up that amount of weight. When one chain fails, the rest will follow.
i kept saying get the hell out from under neath the thing , basic crane safety , never stand under the load , fricking idiots , no way they should have been using a cable /chain /shackle that wasnt way over rated still lucky bounce
I think the choice of rigging would have been fine if they had balanced the load before swinging it. Even the greenest rookie could see it was way out of level. I think they kept it too high off the deck too- they should have lowered it as soon as it had cleared the side of the ship.
Couldn't really ask for a better "bad scenario" honestly. It could have dropped it higher off the ground, or as it was between the ship and dock. Glad no one got hit.
Obviously if you knew anything about hoisting and rigging that shouldn't have happened if they used the right weight capacity chain for that load and if they did use the correct chain then they miss calculated on the center of gravity. So indeed the people lifting the load aren't the brightest/safest.
How does this stuff happen.., SWL's are 4-8 times LESS than the failure point of chain's and sling's. A 10 ton chainset should take 40 tons before failure and a 10 ton sling should take 80 tons before failure, a least thats the way it is in NZ and were only sheep farmers.
Seemed like bad rigging when the left rear connection was inside the wheel and the right rear connection was outside the tire. Maybe that was a problem, maybe not. But bad planning and setup. Those guys were probably HEY YOU hires anyway.
Oops... Did you see those guys run after it hit the deck? Why were they running? Once the truck hits the deck, it's all over. No need to run. But, I'll bet the Captain of that barge wasn't a happy camper after that.
The chain broke because the weight was uneven! The crane driver should never have loaded the vehicle without a horizontal and equitable load. The back chains took the brunt of the lift. Physics 101!
Maybe to avoid any flying chains, hooks and shackles that came hurling off the crane? i sure as hell wouldnt be standing around too close to 793 that just came crashing down
Well, there is that. However, if they hadn't been hit with any flying shrapnel by the time the truck stopped bouncing, they won't get hit with anything.
Lucky guys. No OSHA in that country. OSHA is a huge PIA, but people walking underneath a crane load is somewhat of a no-no. Plus, it is relatively stupid? Survival of the fittest.
It's like when they dropped that EMD GT46 on the dock in Gabon in 2012. Why the fuck are they lifting heavy ass equipment with four chinsey ass chains. I would have triple redundancy on that. Let's move millions of dollars worth of heavy equipment but lets save $5 on cheap chains and use less than we need.
chains were inadequate really for this heavy lift and should not have been used, Nylon/polyester heavy-duty lifting slings/strops should have been used for lifting heavy machinery like this,
Like 400 safety violations in this one video. Jesus Christ everyone from the foreman to the cameraman should be fired. No guideman. Walking underneath the load. No load bearing redundancy (always lift with 2x capacity of the load). And obviously the chains hadn't been load tested recently or they would have failed under test and not during use.
Center of Gravity shifted Cargo hence forces on grommets were not evenly distributed - inspite of Spreader used. Most probably BL of Grommets too close to actual Cargo weight.
Freaking lucky no one got hurt. That said Who was the Dumb SOB who thought they should use chains around the “axle hubs” and not slings. Additionally I would of thought those trucks would of had lifting eyes on the chassis because I would think this is not the first time one of these trucks was lifted by a crane
The broken chain was in between the wheel and body, got something in there that put too much stress on one link. The other side it was in contact with just the tire itself.
Shoutout to the cameraman for keeping the camera on target when something actually happens
lol true
Who do you think loosened the chain?
@@joeyjamison5772 Lololol!!!!!
@@joeyjamison5772 i think the hook was too heavy
That's no shit there buddy!!!👍😂😂
That's why they wear helmets, just in case the truck falls on them.
jeet kune do is a good book to read
Hahaha win!
so what your trying to say is the helmet can save them from that heavy truck huh x_x is it a super helmet
Syed Adnaan LOL. I wasn't trying to say anything, it was just a joke.
:P oh k
"For Sale: 1 Cat Dumptruck, never driven and only dropped once."
Funny
Thats not a cat, it didnt land on all 4 feet
"GOOD! right there! Alright, boys! Tie it down!"
I bet they needed a change of pants! At first I saw one guy standing almost directly under it.. I bet he won't do that again. Glad it was low when it broke and that everyone is OK.
That was some lucky break. A clean drop, with NO damage, and no injuries. Could have dropped over the railings. Give that an A+ "ACCIDENT".
I taught that truck chassis had enough falling energy to go through the deck or explode one of the tires. Amazing how tough the deck and tires are.
The truck fell on a boat, not a deck.
Sorry my friend. It's a ship. It has a deck as called in the nautical world.
Kendall Sain LOL! That deck's made of mahogany!
Kendall Sain not a boat. A sheep.
I heard a captain correct a passenger one day
when you think about the amount of weight that will be on those tyres when fully loaded, an empty truck is really not much for them.
01:30 what a lucky son of a bitch
Yessa, me sella you high quality chain! Made in China, like all good quality stuff! I guarantee chain. Give you 50/50 guarantee! 50 feet or 50 second!
Incorrect lifting tackle was used. Chains can not be used around the wheel hubs at this angle. Web slings should have been used.
Was looking for the first guy to get it right.
Geeeeeeez... Did that bloke really walk underneath that @1.30?
What a numpty lol
i don't think he did. he walked closer to the camera. not sure of course, just guessing based on where he walks on the deck and where the front wheel landed
seems like huge loads are always lifted by spindly chains and straps. It is like they use the smallest things possible....sigh
Those 2 guys are very talented, not just anyone can multitask a sprint while shitting themselves all at once, years of experience.
If y'all notice, at 1:38 a bird lands on the rear left tire and the added weight made the chains fail. They forgot to factor in the bird's weight just in case one did land on the dump truck. Also, they are in the Southern Hemisphere, things weigh a little more down under. So obvious.
Theres no bird on the wheel idk how you even think thats a bird
***** Shelton, is that you?
Must have been an African sparrow. They are big enough to carry coconuts.
Pete Diaz there is no bird.
I'm just glad no one got hurt, I really really really hate seeing people doing their jobs and doing what they are suppose to be doing and get hurt.
Crane Operator, "Well, I didn't rig the fucking thing!"
Lucky bastards! Everyone escaped, and even the damage to the equipment seems minimal.
Chain slings failed simple as that. Probably weren't inspected prior and it is very possible that they were not rated to pick up that amount of weight. When one chain fails, the rest will follow.
"ok now lower it... gently....gently....GENTLY....ok perfect!"
It's a little hot.. I think I'll stand in the shade.
There ya go boys, shes loaded just as usual....
I heard the guy say a chain broke ?? I was always told never use chains for lifting or rigging. Hmm.
try the new moving job!!! it will wake you up better than coffee in the morning!!!!
I got anxiety just watching those workers keep standing to close to the damn thing...
a little bondo and some touch up paint charge extra for the stress test
Right about ... THERE!!! Perfect, quick disconnect and grab the other one.
well, there are probably safer ways but this is certainly the fastest!
"There ya go! One dump truck loaded on deck, What's next?"
Uh, on second thought I think I'll cancel my order.
whats the problem truck loaded.
I don't understand why even some experienced workers stay under heavy loads. Unlike us, they may also have seen many horrible accidents too.
??
incident at 1:41
Can tell it was South Africa from the accent alone.
That's the last time that guy will walk under anything.
who the heck still use chain for such project. Heavy steel wire ropes are way tougher, and they don't snap unpredictably.
made me jump
good thing parking brake was set
Just drop it there mate :)
Weak link! Plus foreskin jinxed it right before breakage "Theyll prolly f this up
You're only as strong as your weakest link.
When you manage to fail so well that you drop it perfectly.
At least they got it on the ship.
That could have been worse !
I love the guy's accent he sounds like a badass
youre good..youre good.... youre good.... dont worry captain well buff out those scratches
i kept saying get the hell out from under neath the thing , basic crane safety , never stand under the load , fricking idiots , no way they should have been using a cable /chain /shackle that wasnt way over rated still lucky bounce
With cargo that valuable why don’t they use double or triple straps?
Money.
Stupid crane
Perfect, looks good to me, right where we wanted it.
A simple "sv_cheats 1" then set "sv_gravity" to the lowest integer and that wouldn't have happened.
@Juden Arier IDK, maybe tap the ~ on your smart phone.
If the world ran on gamebryo the truck woulda just clipped through the boat as it fell
@@Wafflepudding I could just imagine aircraft carriers without Vphysic Clip enabled.
Did not rig it level. Sling on rear carrying more of total load than others in front. Bad rigging and choice of rigging.
I think the choice of rigging would have been fine if they had balanced the load before swinging it. Even the greenest rookie could see it was way out of level. I think they kept it too high off the deck too- they should have lowered it as soon as it had cleared the side of the ship.
Wow, bet they will learn not to get under loads.... Thank God they didn't learn the hard way.
Props to the guy in the background in 1:39 who noticed something was wrong. Too bad there wasn't time to do anything.
Couldn't really ask for a better "bad scenario" honestly. It could have dropped it higher off the ground, or as it was between the ship and dock. Glad no one got hit.
Obviously if you knew anything about hoisting and rigging that shouldn't have happened if they used the right weight capacity chain for that load and if they did use the correct chain then they miss calculated on the center of gravity. So indeed the people lifting the load aren't the brightest/safest.
How does this stuff happen..,
SWL's are 4-8 times LESS than the failure point of chain's and sling's.
A 10 ton chainset should take 40 tons before failure and a 10 ton sling should take 80 tons before failure, a least thats the way it is in NZ and were only sheep farmers.
Seemed like bad rigging when the left rear connection was inside the wheel and the right rear connection was outside the tire. Maybe that was a problem, maybe not. But bad planning and setup. Those guys were probably HEY YOU hires anyway.
Oops... Did you see those guys run after it hit the deck? Why were they running? Once the truck hits the deck, it's all over. No need to run. But, I'll bet the Captain of that barge wasn't a happy camper after that.
Bouncy bouncy...
The chain broke because the weight was uneven! The crane driver should never have loaded the vehicle without a horizontal and equitable load. The back chains took the brunt of the lift. Physics 101!
Even if I wasnt on the boat, I would have screamed loudly like a woman just for the sake of adding to the effects.
Thats why you don't use chains. A chain is only as strong as the weakest link. At least it looked like noone got hurt.
Maybe to avoid any flying chains, hooks and shackles that came hurling off the crane? i sure as hell wouldnt be standing around too close to 793 that just came crashing down
Fucks sake,
Watch the guy in the yellow vest at 1:43: Looks like he's trying to flap wings and fly away.
Comical M.F'r.
Well, there is that. However, if they hadn't been hit with any flying shrapnel by the time the truck stopped bouncing, they won't get hit with anything.
I actually wish that would’ve happened when those idiots were walking under it. First lesson is to NEVER FUCKIN EVER WALK UNDER A SUSPENDED LOAD!!!
Bad rigging. Looks like the left rear had more weight than the right rear? Good thing the guys were out of the line of fiire.
Lucky guys. No OSHA in that country. OSHA is a huge PIA, but people walking underneath a crane load is somewhat of a no-no. Plus, it is relatively stupid? Survival of the fittest.
That's what happens when chains are used lifting a heavy load. Not to mention the constant rotating they were doing also.
Maybe if they would have tied more balloons to the load this could have been avoided. The seaboard marine crane would agree
talk about lucky..and good timing for the blokes that got out of the way..next time they won't buy their chain at walmart!
ahhh geez whoopsie daisy lmao
Whats the max line load?
200t.
Whats the vehicle weight?
230t.
Lift it.
But, sir!
It'l be fine!
2 minutes later, BOOOM!
It's like when they dropped that EMD GT46 on the dock in Gabon in 2012. Why the fuck are they lifting heavy ass equipment with four chinsey ass chains. I would have triple redundancy on that. Let's move millions of dollars worth of heavy equipment but lets save $5 on cheap chains and use less than we need.
chains were inadequate really for this heavy lift and should not have been used, Nylon/polyester heavy-duty lifting slings/strops should have been used for lifting heavy machinery like this,
You can never have enough straps or chains for safety!
talk about dropping something off
Like 400 safety violations in this one video. Jesus Christ everyone from the foreman to the cameraman should be fired. No guideman. Walking underneath the load. No load bearing redundancy (always lift with 2x capacity of the load). And obviously the chains hadn't been load tested recently or they would have failed under test and not during use.
Who the hell uses chains to lift? We always, always use cables or straps and only use chains to tie down.
Center of Gravity shifted Cargo hence forces on grommets were not evenly distributed - inspite of Spreader used. Most probably BL of Grommets too close to actual Cargo weight.
Wy do people rush shit don't understand trying to make sure they see them working dealing w tons of shit
Well, you know... They gotta do a little bounce check before letting the customer take it off the lot...
that was bag rigging they should have put it down and re rigged it.. someone should have been fired
the cowards run away instead of steadying the truck when it falls
must be union labor
Massive truck, little human. I'm absolutely positive people over at liveleak would love to see you try that dumbass.
Zack Smith im 96% sure talesin was joking.
Still lacking 4% :)
Talesin-God of the Internet And that would make you a dumb ass.
@ Please refer to my original comment. And it is Must not musty.
Anyone have the copart link? Could use a big truck...
Was there no engineered lift points? Rock trucks are lifted every day, use the designed lift points. Don’t just choke the axles because your lazy.
Freaking lucky no one got hurt. That said Who was the Dumb SOB who thought they should use chains around the “axle hubs” and not slings. Additionally I would of thought those trucks would of had lifting eyes on the chassis because I would think this is not the first time one of these trucks was lifted by a crane
The broken chain was in between the wheel and body, got something in there that put too much stress on one link. The other side it was in contact with just the tire itself.
Hi
easily avoidable...not figuring out weight requirements and rigging capacity
That could have been a lot worse. They should have longer guide ropes for a lift like that!
That's more of a weakest link incident than a truck accident. Where oh where did my 2:40 go?
OSHA or MOSHA would've stop the lift, if they seen how short those tag lines they were using.
WOW. People think a 50 cal round is dangerous? HA.
One of those links hit someone, yep.
Good everyone is ok!
bet the guy that started to walk under that thing shit himself when the chain broke, lol!
Never use chains, lifting strops should have been used really. Very lucky people indeed.
Illustrated reason why not to stand under (or near, really) something a crane is lifting....
Opppppsss.. should have inspected those shackles and lifting steel straps better. :)
that one dude was about 6 seconds away from death, bet he sharted wen that happend
lol its cause u mentioned it realized the baloons in that video