Things that used to weigh as much as an airplane can now fit in your pocket and now the see through technology in ironman 1 and 2 is available. Its called graphene and its uses are endless
But computers are for storing information. The actual power source was nowhere hear that size. The arc reactor would be a power source that would have to be that big. With computers we shrunk the other components. With the arc reactor, we'd have to shrink the whole power source, which is a lot harder because power sources produce heat. Information storage probably produces heat too, but not nearly as much. And if the arc reactor as we see in the move was real, it would produce a TON of heat
***** it isn't even Nuclear in reality, granted it does makes use of radioactive compounds like palladium up till the second movie and Vibranium (assumed name) afterwords, the interactions with another unknown chemical, combined with the idea of electrical resonance, an idea by Tesla that nearly worked in his time. The electrons pass through the chemicals and change them into another form, as it resonates this new chemical interacts with the original creating a stable solid ring (or triangle) of energy in about half a picosecond due to the speed of electricity.
@@animo358 Vibranium acts like a subatomic stepper spring meaning it is great at storeing and releasing energy which is completely possible because all atoms do this with varying maximum capacity. I believe that certain alloys could achieve the abilities of the different metals in the Marvel universe
There is no Heat assholes !!! Heat generates and Exothermic reaction occurs when when 2 atoms fuse together called Fusion . And Arc reactors does COLD FUSION ....repeat after me .. "COLD FUSION " That's how ARC reactor works - An ARC of catalyzed palladium starts the reactor and then neutrons strikes the palladium rings thus palladium gives 2 atoms - RHODIUM 103 AND _________ . ( Confidential ) . Then , Rhodium and ______ fuse together to create a heavier atom Now , 2 things happen in Rhodium and ________ fusion... 1) Heat generation occurs due to fusion . 2) An Energy is released The heat gets attracted by the magnetic flux and cooled itself while the Energy makes the ARC REACTOR ......
I'm working on the reactor. Fusion itself does create a large power pulse, but we have yet to devise a way to effectively capture all that power pulse. There are more effective and accessible ways to create high power output generators or reactors.
No. The movie reactor is not able to be fusion, as that would generate enough heat to incinerate the user. Radioactive decay of various metals, particularly the actual element Palladium, is highly useful in generating electric current with high energy bombardment. For my purposes, there are other approaches that would have to be made. And this guy's estimation of the power output of 1-16 million HP is erroneous. It would not at all take such power. It entirely depends on what implements one has for various systems, and what power levels they would demand. With some creativity, ingenuity, and lots of trying, a power source that could be an early predecessor of such a 'reactor' is currently possible.
And take a few minutes to read through this overview of how such a reactor might theoretically work....it's worth the time... gizmodo.com/how-iron-mans-arc-reactor-probably-works-1661613682
The upside is that you don't need that much power to make the suit work, but you'll still need something no one has yet; and if small scale fusion is not your goal, you might actually succeed.
Sir sorry if this sounds rude but u said that tony stark placed the arc reactor into his heart 1 that is highly unlikely because if something was to be placed into ur heart that it not to help it work then it would block the blood flow that is in your heart and clot 2 if u look closely the arc reactor is placed in the canter of tony Starks chest and the heart is 4/5 mm to the right of the human body 3 if u watch the movie ironman 1 then u see that tony uses the A.R. (short for arc reactor) to stop shrapnel from penetrating his heart when the bad guys fire a rocket at Tonys transport car he runs and it lands very close to where he was when the weapon broke apart it hit tony in the chest the bad guys grabbed tony and got him to a medical facility in the bad guys lair and a doctor that was kidnaped helped tony he put a magnetic pipe tub in the centre of his chest and placed a electric box to to some wiring and powered the magnet but the doctor said it would not last more that 3 months so tony made the arc reactor to sustain the magnetic tub it would have lasted him his hole life if he didn't build the ironman mark 1 but he hocked the mark 1 the he A.R. And it was leaking energy like mad because it was not built the the energy mass in mind 4 when u say the A.R. Is gonna be mad but it will be the size of a building the A.R. Was what tony based his smaller one off of he has a A.R. In his lad to power his lad so he could have a life time of electricity in the one place that is the end of my judgement sorry again if it sound rude
We literally see it in his chest cavity in the same movie relax it's a sci Fi movie. He used the magenta from the reactor to pull the shrapnel not too complicated
For now, we can make a basic Iron Man suit that can be integrated for military use. Probably in several years we can pull off a miniature fusion reactor since technology is advancing so quickly. I just wonder if they'll make this suit available to the public, which in the comics, was Tony's original goal.
@ 3:16 the movie quotes "3 gigajoules per second" which equals 1117.518 horsepower per hour which is one super powerful corvette or two 558 corvettes (per hour), which is not a few thousand corvettes.
My theory is that you might be able to create a fusion reactor smaller than the one iron man used. By using the natural elements in nature. After all these elements are making technology the size of an atom. A building that stores a little amount of information has come to the size of a little chip by using silicon
A very excellent video. In the modern world, the technology that exists is always years ahead of what the general public is aware of. So if you see a powered exoskeleton video on youtube, I bet you there's something even more amazing we just haven't seen yet.
Human has not much time left based on what they are doing to earth by their science and etc. Evolution of tech also take earth near to it's doomsday. Science has limits and before science, human has more more limits. Just think about how many billions and billions dollars western world investing military, nuclear weapon, Drones, Air craft etc etc. Do you know humans have build nuclear bomb which has 80 times powerful than what was blast on Nagasaki-Hiroshima. It's called Tsar Bomba. Do you think they are investing so much for nothing? No outcome against billions? Does world need such Bomb? Will alien come to invade earth? What is the point? Why advance killing machines are making to kill humans? Humans investing on trash more than their own development. Those billions can solve total world problems such as - poverty, malnutrition, literacy problem, economics, most major major disease issues, climate change etc. Finding Planets will not help humans never will. Humans never leave this plant for his lifetime. coz they are running out of resources. Science will die under hunger and battle of human. Wait and see how this planet come to it's end very soon.
Dungen Clan Master I disagree. Interstellar travel and interplanetary expeditions can benefit humanity if mankind was able to find other planets or even just one other planet that could sustain carbon based life forms, thus it would also have new resources, undiscovered elements, imagine a whole new periodic table, the possibilities are so endless it's incomprehensible. I don't believe science or humanity have a limit. Our potential is limitless, there's still so much we don't know about ourselves, or the extent of our capabilities, or the universe.
@@h311purg3 Just imagine we are going to Alpha century star system. That was nearest start system to our star system. Do you know how far that is? 4.4+ light years. If we make something which speed 1000 km per second still we can't reach there in one life. It means anyone who travel through space he/she couldn't make it his own lifetime. It will take generations. 2/3/5/10/20 whatever. If someone reach that start system we still don't know what is waiting for us there. Maybe what we guess that would be false. Maybe human can't survive there. Then what they gonna do? Another star system was 5.6+ light years from our solar system. Do you know how many stars we have in our galaxy? Here we have more than 200+ plant where scientists believe that life exist. But problem is that they are so far away we couldn't send any prob there to check it's right or wrong. Go check the locations of Voyazer 1 & 2. They recently left our solar system and their speed was 12 km per second. Just remember one thing light speed couldn't possible. So anyway human want to go the speed will always be less than light speed. I think human can't make any space craft which can travel through space, 50% of light speed with Passengers. So don't get hopeful by seeing shitty media coverage. That we've done this and that. We can't even find cure for some disease. USA and Russia are busy to sell their weapons to living luxurious life. USA try to hold his position as world super power and Russia try achieve that super power. Rest of the world are there 'Guinea Pig' specially Moslem countries. Well those countries are now destroyed. They will go after 2nd world countries. Wait and watch. Scientists are fooling us by saying that human will go to mars. Why they try to go on a dead plant? Mars atmosphere isn't suitable for humans. There is no protector shield what we have. Sun uvi ray easily enters on Mars. If scientists think to live on Mars. They will definitely need resources. If resources need to take from earth then why we are wasting our resources to live there. Where we won't get anything. If you believe human can live on Mars, I would like to inform you that human need Terraforming to adjust there. This terraforming will take more or less 1 million years. Do you think human will live that much time on earth after knowing what is happening to earth?
@@h311purg3 so howd you do that ? creating wormhole ? figuring out how human body can with stand the speed of light ? if we could somehow travel with the speed of light, all the corners of the universe would be still impossible to reach, not even in single human life time.
I'm sure it references to the reactor running on the element Palladium using Cold Fusion? Somehow he got Cold Fusion to work properly in a tiny reactor. Why you say? Because he's Iron Man. Or it runs on a super miniaturised Tokamak reactor,but like many have said before, it would melt his insides, but like many have also said before"Computers will never be that small"it can happen,we don't know when or how, but all it takes is for someone's mind to just click,that'll be the first stepping stone.
Dont forget the repulse ray it's his ability to fly and a plused weopon, I suspect the suite may use memory metals to lock the suit around him and to supply powerd movement of the arms, legs and body. All of that requires computer control and sensers . Also a laser can take and use some of that power. After all of that you can use sound, intense lighting the list goes on .A space suit underwater extrem conditions you name it.
I think a cold fusion reaction can work bot to do a stabke ine wiuld be difficult. And also maybe we can use the actual arc reactor (20 or 30 storeys high) to power a battery. But that too wouldn't power the suit as it has a flying function. So maybe using thorium can be an option unless we find a way to get rid of the radiaton
@@scifirealism5943 a few gas turbo jets are enough to lift a human. Look at Richard Brownings jet pack that. Adding a wing to create lift would reduce the amount of jets needed to maintain flight. Storing fuel in the wings or in fuel bladders will give you a decent flight time.
@@AstroRayGun chemical fuels do not have the energy density of an arc reactor. And the engines you mentioned cannot produce the type of thrust Iron man suits make(he out races fighter jets and missiles, travels across continents in hours, goes into Orbit)
I would like to add that we do have fusion machines, but they are bulky and take an enormous amount of energy to start. Lawerence lab is making one using lasers, but the holy grail of fusion is cold fusion. I think I read cold fusion is mathematically possible but no one has being able to make a cold fusion engine. Cold fusion just means fusion that starts at a low energy level instead of what we are doing now, hot fusion. But yeah with a cold fusion core iron man can last for ever.
Science fiction - "It takes stuff kind of bubbling along and pushers it along further." The ironman flying sequences and the hydrogen / nuclear reactor in his chest seem far fetched. But a suit that makes you smarter faster and more agile on land, as was mentioned, could happen..
By the way, I believe a fusion device the size of a few inches is completely possible. This professor is obviously a skeptic of cold fusion. But even the most hardened skeptical physcist conceded the possibility after visiting a univeristy in Iran where they cautiously measured inexplicable temperature anomalies that could not have been chemical in origin(on UA-cam). The book Fire From Ice shows how new paradigm shifts meet excessive resistance from scientists - even for initial exploration.
Well, if you play it smart, there's a lot of difficult steps, but the first is the power source. Since Iron Man is unrealistic to the power source, you'd need to work with it to incorporate something different, but I'm sure it's completely possible to the the power needed if you study the chemistry and overall science of the battery before you get started.
yepp its a palladium nuclear fusion generator based ark reactor, powering not only starks super magnet keeping the shrapnel from piercing his heart killing him which the palladium core itself is actually achieving until replaced with the fictional element of vibranium in the second movie, but also it powers the HUD in the helmet aided by the JARVIS system, and the uni-beam, repulsion flight stabilizers, weapons systems, and rocket thrusters.
Palladium can bind extreme amounts of Hydrogen (about 3000 times its own volume) and in the Movie it is seen that his "Arc Reactor" is palladium powered. Maybe this fact helps in the process of fusion in this Arc Reactor...
The technology behind the Arc reactor is scientifically possible and it is not a fusion reaction. The Arc is possible based on Tesla's theories of electrical resonance, and could be done on a small scale. Just takes someone to look into further, and of course money.
In all honesty,it really is possible to create Tony's Arc Reactor.Yes it would take some time to figure out,but once we figure out cold fusion that will just increase the possibility of an Arc Reactor being real.
In the movie Tony says the suit is made of a gold titanium alloid, but would that even be possible. If so could you cut it and make it into a suit. I want to learn more about the suit and start this as a enormous military project someday. I need to figure out more though.
I empathize with those skeptical scientists. It's like you know all the parameters of a system, and someone tells you something that is just not possible given the parameters. Think about if no one explained a nuclear reactor to someone in the 1800's(lets pretend he's seen no stars or decay). As far as they know, chemical bond strains can only release a maxium of x energy. To say that a sample can produce 100x energy would appear very ludicrous.
what about the use of antimatter couldnt that be used to create enough energy for a suit like that if you can contain the antimatter and not cause an annihilation
The heat would kill Ironman but I don't think he meant it like that. It's more like a cold fusion, even just two atoms at a time fusing would give alot of power and if it was continuous it would be limit less. Cause as we show once activated its on for ever. Maybe the power is regulated by the interval of the atoms coming together the more power he needs the shorter the interval the less power the hight the interv It could be antimatter as well they miss and when he needs power they collide
So while an actual Iron Man may not be feasible yet, what he's saying is that Earwig and Pilltar are quite possible. It's combining the two into one that makes it Iron Man.
we have a fusion system (laboratory for laser energetics) in development at our school, and the equipments are huge. no way it can happen in that small arc reactor.
You wouldn't need to use a mutation or anything, it could be very well possible through gene splicing and stem cells (although a spider bite would most likely be impossible).
Actually, the fusion mini reactor solves only one minor inconvenience... Lets start with Flying: Unless he uses some mystical force, he need propulsion. Given the dimensions of the armour we'll have very small turbines. They would need to generate an absurd amount of pressure. Since no system is 100% efficient, those turbines would REALLY heat up and, likely, melt (and Tony with them). So, no flying.
But that's not all folks! Super strength via exoskeleton. I am assuming he has material with enough structural resistance to make it really small. I am also assuming these robotic enhacements are controled via neurolinks, so as to respond in perfect harmony with his own body (or the armour would destroy his limbs). Also, there is the leverage aspect. Although his armour is made of a fantasy alloy that withstands the pressure and has a reactor to power it...he is still dependant of basic physics like gravity. The "SUV catch" would take him of balance...and likely destroy the pacement under his feet...
Armour resistance to impact. I am assuming that that alloy is indestructible, no matter how thin it is. As far as I understand, Stark is still a member of human species...with a brain inside à skull. With organs inside his chest. This means that a .50BMG shot to his head, or being violently throw into a truck would lead to concussion e internal bleeding and organ displacement. Same would happen with sharp U turns at Mack 4.
@@techphile3262 assuming he added some Vibranium padding...he might pull that. We are talking magic here, since Vibranium seems to endlessly keep absorbing knynetic energy without a sweat. Assuming an indestructible alloy, perfectly sinchronized servomotors... Vibranium absorbing the heat from the arc reactor and inertia from the fights...we still have the question of WHY ON HELL GO INSIDE THE ARMOUR. Vanko was right...drone better.
This is neat. Thanks for posting this video; I actually thought that Iron Man might not have been able to lift that car, but now it actually makes sense! ;)
I dont understand shit about that reaction stuff and shit... But i think it is just like the computer timelapse but it takes longer. First computers were the size of a building... Now they can be the size of your hand (raspberry pi) maybe in the future we will actually see a real arc reactor size of a hockey puck...
Problem though is computers are Digital electronics, and it's processing power is not exactly dependent on size, (except Moors law) but power and thermonuclear electronics is more dependant on physical size, or a least energy density.
after this video, the professor proceeded down to the school basement to scream at the TA, "You imbecile! The suits not ready? Tony Stark would've finished it by now!" ... The TA: "WELL, I'M NOT TONY STARK!"
@panzarw Power source: yet to be discovered. Artificial muscles: nanofiber. Material: some sort of alloy... maybe titanium aluminum. hey look! i spelled pam! lol.
Kwang-Won Chung there Will never be batteries small enough that can hold enough power, just look at tesla, the car is completely covered with batteries yet still it’s range is still not good enough for slot of consumers
A miniature fusion reactor is highly unlikely and has been discredited by many scientists, however, it is very likely that someday we will stumble upon some Super-Crystals which can be harvested for their extra-ordinary energy output. The contraption in Tony's chest would act as an inverter/amplifier of that energy, and would allow him to direct plasma discharges outwardly, creating a necessary dual purpose of 1) thrust for lift-off and super-sonic flight, and 2) for the use of the Chester as weapon.
Skander Chida A California University in Berkeley had already made a small, 4 inch reactor. It could be used like it is in the movie with years of development and design.
Fusion is not going to happen in a man portable reactor with that level of utility in the next half of the millennium at least, if it's even possible in the first place. First, we have to actually make fusion produce more energy than it takes to keep it going! Secondly, if that reactor is 99% efficient, and only 1%, or 10000 hp is going to be wasted as heat, Stark would be experiencing what it's like to have a 7million+ watt heating element embedded in his chest; i.e., reduced to ash.
This seems credible and something I plan on in my life time. Not sure how I'd do it. But every night I go to bed, I picture my self putting the suit together. I already know I'm going to use titanium steel plating which is threat level 3 rated and can withstand multiple AK-47 rounds. Not sure about flight. Maybe introducing hydrogen and oxygen in a magnetic-vortex plasma generator turbine, or a high powered laser air-exploding turbine. Power source I haven't worked out yet
@1161858 thats only because of in the first moviue the electro magnet was keeping out the poisen the poisen was getting in the arc reactor and was slowly toxicating and killing him
2:55-3:05 Thats How Computers started out from what I've heard. The first computer's dimensions were about 8 feet by 3 feet by 100 feet. It weighed about 27 tons, and took up 1800 square feet of space. and 30 years later they were so small you could fit them in your pocket. like calculators for instance. Cant wait to fly to work in my Ironman suit Ha Ha!
@panzarw ive seen this nano tech battery that could be capable of controlling the power needed to operate the suit. Alright this sounds kinda simple but why not making a mini atom smasher and harness the energy created in order to power it. Controlling that much would be extremely hard if even possible.
Is it me or is every AI on a tv show is always very sarcastic like KIT from Night Rider. My concern is the wirering, if you run that much power it will melt any small wires. lol but maybe in the future we will perfect wireless transfer of electricity just like Tesla did along time ago. he did make it work and it did send electricity to a receiver imagine no wires anymore .
@panzarw Stan Lee's Superhumans found a guy that could fly. He had a home made set of wings with 4 small jet engines and a throttle to control his speed, but his body controlled his actual flight. Yay for random facts!
But can the human body take that amount powerfull movement like runing 100 miles in hour and throwing a punch with 300 miles in hour wouldn't the muscles be comepletely broken
"Tony was able to build this in a cave, with a box of scraps"
Vignesh Shankar yeah he was also fake
Mike Grant yeah and you also don’t understand jokes
@@mikegrant5584 nobody caaaaaaaaaares
we managed to put 50+square feet computers in the size of a smarphone so...
sc
Things that used to weigh as much as an airplane can now fit in your pocket and now the see through technology in ironman 1 and 2 is available.
Its called graphene and its uses are endless
But computers are for storing information. The actual power source was nowhere hear that size. The arc reactor would be a power source that would have to be that big. With computers we shrunk the other components. With the arc reactor, we'd have to shrink the whole power source, which is a lot harder because power sources produce heat. Information storage probably produces heat too, but not nearly as much. And if the arc reactor as we see in the move was real, it would produce a TON of heat
Essentially, Tony Stark's armor is a walking nuke. Amazing he doesn't irradiate himself. Wonder how he manages to filter out all that heat?
***** it isn't even Nuclear in reality, granted it does makes use of radioactive compounds like palladium up till the second movie and Vibranium (assumed name) afterwords, the interactions with another unknown chemical, combined with the idea of electrical resonance, an idea by Tesla that nearly worked in his time. The electrons pass through the chemicals and change them into another form, as it resonates this new chemical interacts with the original creating a stable solid ring (or triangle) of energy in about half a picosecond due to the speed of electricity.
@@animo358 Vibranium acts like a subatomic stepper spring meaning it is great at storeing and releasing energy which is completely possible because all atoms do this with varying maximum capacity.
I believe that certain alloys could achieve the abilities of the different metals in the Marvel universe
There is no Heat assholes !!!
Heat generates and Exothermic reaction occurs when when 2 atoms fuse together called Fusion .
And Arc reactors does COLD FUSION ....repeat after me .. "COLD FUSION "
That's how ARC reactor works -
An ARC of catalyzed palladium starts the reactor and then neutrons strikes the palladium rings thus palladium gives 2 atoms - RHODIUM 103 AND _________ . ( Confidential ) . Then , Rhodium and ______ fuse together to create a heavier atom
Now , 2 things happen in Rhodium and ________ fusion...
1) Heat generation occurs due to fusion .
2) An Energy is released
The heat gets attracted by the magnetic flux and cooled itself while the Energy makes the ARC REACTOR ......
- - - -@@freetubemovies.644
Now explain where the electricity from the nuclear plants comes from ?
And what does that have to do with "cold fusion" ?
What he didnt go over and is highly laughed upon by many scientist is the idea of the arc reactor using cold fusion with the palladium
I'm working on the reactor.
Fusion itself does create a large power pulse, but we have yet to devise a way to effectively capture all that power pulse. There are more effective and accessible ways to create high power output generators or reactors.
When you say you are "working on the reactor", exactly what are you working on?
A fusion reactor ?
No. The movie reactor is not able to be fusion, as that would generate enough heat to incinerate the user. Radioactive decay of various metals, particularly the actual element Palladium, is highly useful in generating electric current with high energy bombardment. For my purposes, there are other approaches that would have to be made. And this guy's estimation of the power output of 1-16 million HP is erroneous. It would not at all take such power. It entirely depends on what implements one has for various systems, and what power levels they would demand. With some creativity, ingenuity, and lots of trying, a power source that could be an early predecessor of such a 'reactor' is currently possible.
And take a few minutes to read through this overview of how such a reactor might theoretically work....it's worth the time...
gizmodo.com/how-iron-mans-arc-reactor-probably-works-1661613682
davidsirmons lol. That’s an answer from quora. He even said in the answer that it wasn’t real science it was fake science
The upside is that you don't need that much power to make the suit work, but you'll still need something no one has yet; and if small scale fusion is not your goal, you might actually succeed.
Sir sorry if this sounds rude but u said that tony stark placed the arc reactor into his heart 1 that is highly unlikely because if something was to be placed into ur heart that it not to help it work then it would block the blood flow that is in your heart and clot 2 if u look closely the arc reactor is placed in the canter of tony Starks chest and the heart is 4/5 mm to the right of the human body 3 if u watch the movie ironman 1 then u see that tony uses the A.R. (short for arc reactor) to stop shrapnel from penetrating his heart when the bad guys fire a rocket at Tonys transport car he runs and it lands very close to where he was when the weapon broke apart it hit tony in the chest the bad guys grabbed tony and got him to a medical facility in the bad guys lair and a doctor that was kidnaped helped tony he put a magnetic pipe tub in the centre of his chest and placed a electric box to to some wiring and powered the magnet but the doctor said it would not last more that 3 months so tony made the arc reactor to sustain the magnetic tub it would have lasted him his hole life if he didn't build the ironman mark 1 but he hocked the mark 1 the he A.R. And it was leaking energy like mad because it was not built the the energy mass in mind 4 when u say the A.R. Is gonna be mad but it will be the size of a building the A.R. Was what tony based his smaller one off of he has a A.R. In his lad to power his lad so he could have a life time of electricity in the one place that is the end of my judgement sorry again if it sound rude
It sounds unintelligent because you're messing up every other word... Not to be rude....
We literally see it in his chest cavity in the same movie relax it's a sci Fi movie. He used the magenta from the reactor to pull the shrapnel not too complicated
since a fusion reactor is 40-50 ft. high, could you be able to charge the suit and still be able to get the effects from the movie?
For now, we can make a basic Iron Man suit that can be integrated for military use. Probably in several years we can pull off a miniature fusion reactor since technology is advancing so quickly. I just wonder if they'll make this suit available to the public, which in the comics, was Tony's original goal.
Actually i read in the book "Art Of Iron Man 2" that the triangular reactor piece is vibranium
@ 3:16 the movie quotes "3 gigajoules per second" which equals 1117.518 horsepower per hour which is one super powerful corvette or two 558 corvettes (per hour), which is not a few thousand corvettes.
Tony's ark reactor is said to to use palladium and rhodium as the reactor materials
03:50 is the best part :)
do you speek from the ARC Reactor how they will works?
My theory is that you might be able to create a fusion reactor smaller than the one iron man used. By using the natural elements in nature. After all these elements are making technology the size of an atom. A building that stores a little amount of information has come to the size of a little chip by using silicon
A very excellent video. In the modern world, the technology that exists is always years ahead of what the general public is aware of. So if you see a powered exoskeleton video on youtube, I bet you there's something even more amazing we just haven't seen yet.
i understand fusion but how would we be able to do it? atom smasher is pretty close but how will we be able to harvest that energy
Tdawg21 Google
Nice❤❤❤
According to me , science have no limit , it may be possible any one create such thing now or may be later.
*has
Human has not much time left based on what they are doing to earth by their science and etc. Evolution of tech also take earth near to it's doomsday. Science has limits and before science, human has more more limits. Just think about how many billions and billions dollars western world investing military, nuclear weapon, Drones, Air craft etc etc. Do you know humans have build nuclear bomb which has 80 times powerful than what was blast on Nagasaki-Hiroshima. It's called Tsar Bomba. Do you think they are investing so much for nothing? No outcome against billions? Does world need such Bomb? Will alien come to invade earth? What is the point? Why advance killing machines are making to kill humans?
Humans investing on trash more than their own development. Those billions can solve total world problems such as - poverty, malnutrition, literacy problem, economics, most major major disease issues, climate change etc. Finding Planets will not help humans never will. Humans never leave this plant for his lifetime. coz they are running out of resources. Science will die under hunger and battle of human.
Wait and see how this planet come to it's end very soon.
Dungen Clan Master I disagree. Interstellar travel and interplanetary expeditions can benefit humanity if mankind was able to find other planets or even just one other planet that could sustain carbon based life forms, thus it would also have new resources, undiscovered elements, imagine a whole new periodic table, the possibilities are so endless it's incomprehensible. I don't believe science or humanity have a limit. Our potential is limitless, there's still so much we don't know about ourselves, or the extent of our capabilities, or the universe.
@@h311purg3 Just imagine we are going to Alpha century star system. That was nearest start system to our star system. Do you know how far that is? 4.4+ light years. If we make something which speed 1000 km per second still we can't reach there in one life. It means anyone who travel through space he/she couldn't make it his own lifetime. It will take generations. 2/3/5/10/20 whatever. If someone reach that start system we still don't know what is waiting for us there. Maybe what we guess that would be false. Maybe human can't survive there. Then what they gonna do? Another star system was 5.6+ light years from our solar system. Do you know how many stars we have in our galaxy? Here we have more than 200+ plant where scientists believe that life exist. But problem is that they are so far away we couldn't send any prob there to check it's right or wrong. Go check the locations of Voyazer 1 & 2. They recently left our solar system and their speed was 12 km per second.
Just remember one thing light speed couldn't possible. So anyway human want to go the speed will always be less than light speed. I think human can't make any space craft which can travel through space, 50% of light speed with Passengers.
So don't get hopeful by seeing shitty media coverage. That we've done this and that. We can't even find cure for some disease.
USA and Russia are busy to sell their weapons to living luxurious life. USA try to hold his position as world super power and Russia try achieve that super power. Rest of the world are there 'Guinea Pig' specially Moslem countries. Well those countries are now destroyed. They will go after 2nd world countries. Wait and watch.
Scientists are fooling us by saying that human will go to mars. Why they try to go on a dead plant? Mars atmosphere isn't suitable for humans. There is no protector shield what we have. Sun uvi ray easily enters on Mars. If scientists think to live on Mars. They will definitely need resources. If resources need to take from earth then why we are wasting our resources to live there. Where we won't get anything. If you believe human can live on Mars, I would like to inform you that human need Terraforming to adjust there. This terraforming will take more or less 1 million years. Do you think human will live that much time on earth after knowing what is happening to earth?
@@h311purg3 so howd you do that ? creating wormhole ? figuring out how human body can with stand the speed of light ? if we could somehow travel with the speed of light, all the corners of the universe would be still impossible to reach, not even in single human life time.
I'm sure it references to the reactor running on the element Palladium using Cold Fusion? Somehow he got Cold Fusion to work properly in a tiny reactor. Why you say? Because he's Iron Man. Or it runs on a super miniaturised Tokamak reactor,but like many have said before, it would melt his insides, but like many have also said before"Computers will never be that small"it can happen,we don't know when or how, but all it takes is for someone's mind to just click,that'll be the first stepping stone.
Dont forget the repulse ray it's his ability to fly and a plused weopon, I suspect the suite may use memory metals to lock the suit around him and to supply powerd movement of the arms, legs and body. All of that requires computer control and sensers . Also a laser can take and use some of that power. After all of that you can use sound, intense lighting the list goes on .A space suit underwater extrem conditions you name it.
+Jesse Reiter Antimatter and electromagents can make the repulsor beams possible.
I think a cold fusion reaction can work bot to do a stabke ine wiuld be difficult. And also maybe we can use the actual arc reactor (20 or 30 storeys high) to power a battery. But that too wouldn't power the suit as it has a flying function. So maybe using thorium can be an option unless we find a way to get rid of the radiaton
So, what about having a jet pack like Falcon?
No. You still need a power supply
@@scifirealism5943 a few gas turbo jets are enough to lift a human. Look at Richard Brownings jet pack that. Adding a wing to create lift would reduce the amount of jets needed to maintain flight. Storing fuel in the wings or in fuel bladders will give you a decent flight time.
@@AstroRayGun chemical fuels do not have the energy density of an arc reactor. And the engines you mentioned cannot produce the type of thrust Iron man suits make(he out races fighter jets and missiles, travels across continents in hours, goes into Orbit)
@@scifirealism5943 ok so what fuel do you think iron man might be using
@@techphile3262 either fusion or antimatter.
Atomic fuel would produce radioactive waste.
Well, this just got recommended to me 10 years later
I would like to add that we do have fusion machines, but they are bulky and take an enormous amount of energy to start. Lawerence lab is making one using lasers, but the holy grail of fusion is cold fusion. I think I read cold fusion is mathematically possible but no one has being able to make a cold fusion engine. Cold fusion just means fusion that starts at a low energy level instead of what we are doing now, hot fusion. But yeah with a cold fusion core iron man can last for ever.
Science fiction - "It takes stuff kind of bubbling along and pushers it along further."
The ironman flying sequences and the hydrogen / nuclear reactor in his chest seem far fetched. But a suit that makes you smarter faster and more agile on land, as was mentioned, could happen..
Science changing the body is a good thing in my opinion. We even have the potential to artificially evolve through genetic science.
i made an arc reactor and its very useful, i use it as a flashlight.
By the way, I believe a fusion device the size of a few inches is completely possible. This professor is obviously a skeptic of cold fusion. But even the most hardened skeptical physcist conceded the possibility after visiting a univeristy in Iran where they cautiously measured inexplicable temperature anomalies that could not have been chemical in origin(on UA-cam). The book Fire From Ice shows how new paradigm shifts meet excessive resistance from scientists - even for initial exploration.
Well, if you play it smart, there's a lot of difficult steps, but the first is the power source. Since Iron Man is unrealistic to the power source, you'd need to work with it to incorporate something different, but I'm sure it's completely possible to the the power needed if you study the chemistry and overall science of the battery before you get started.
i don't understand the beginning of the film. How does the initial armour, made in a case, withstand ak47 rounds?
Graphene.
@@scifirealism5943 what is that
His statement of artificial arms and limbs at 1:42 reminds me of FMA's automail concept.
yepp its a palladium nuclear fusion generator based ark reactor, powering not only starks super magnet keeping the shrapnel from piercing his heart killing him which the palladium core itself is actually achieving until replaced with the fictional element of vibranium in the second movie, but also it powers the HUD in the helmet aided by the JARVIS system, and the uni-beam, repulsion flight stabilizers, weapons systems, and rocket thrusters.
"Wow" thanks for the explanation... You re a very wise men.
Palladium can bind extreme amounts of Hydrogen (about 3000 times its own volume) and in the Movie it is seen that his "Arc Reactor" is palladium powered. Maybe this fact helps in the process of fusion in this Arc Reactor...
The technology behind the Arc reactor is scientifically possible and it is not a fusion reaction. The Arc is possible based on Tesla's theories of electrical resonance, and could be done on a small scale. Just takes someone to look into further, and of course money.
You sir are on the right track.
Michael theScientist like Elon musk?
I don't think Elon can get it done?
Michael theScientist impossible is what starks do best so get with it
If ALL Tesla's works were available and not mostly destroyed, we'd probably have an arc reactor by now....
In all honesty,it really is possible to create Tony's Arc Reactor.Yes it would take some time to figure out,but once we figure out cold fusion that will just increase the possibility of an Arc Reactor being real.
In the movie Tony says the suit is made of a gold titanium alloid, but would that even be possible. If so could you cut it and make it into a suit. I want to learn more about the suit and start this as a enormous military project someday. I need to figure out more though.
If its using cold fusion with a low fiction design, it's possible... The hardest part is starting and sustaining a stable reaction
What it you had the 30-40 ft power source, and then you charged it into the smaller device?
Patrick Sarmiento the heat would vaporize everything
Nobody can make these suits and arc reactors because nobody is as smart as Tony Stark.
it's vibranium only in the novel adaption, in the movie... we don't know, but I'm guessing it's connect to the tesseract cube :/
Appreciate your discussion. Thanks :)
I empathize with those skeptical scientists. It's like you know all the parameters of a system, and someone tells you something that is just not possible given the parameters. Think about if no one explained a nuclear reactor to someone in the 1800's(lets pretend he's seen no stars or decay). As far as they know, chemical bond strains can only release a maxium of x energy. To say that a sample can produce 100x energy would appear very ludicrous.
what about the use of antimatter couldnt that be used to create enough energy for a suit like that if you can contain the antimatter and not cause an annihilation
Great video👍
The heat would kill Ironman but I don't think he meant it like that. It's more like a cold fusion, even just two atoms at a time fusing would give alot of power and if it was continuous it would be limit less. Cause as we show once activated its on for ever. Maybe the power is regulated by the interval of the atoms coming together the more power he needs the shorter the interval the less power the hight the interv
It could be antimatter as well they miss and when he needs power they collide
So while an actual Iron Man may not be feasible yet, what he's saying is that Earwig and Pilltar are quite possible. It's combining the two into one that makes it Iron Man.
we have a fusion system (laboratory for laser energetics) in development at our school, and the equipments are huge. no way it can happen in that small arc reactor.
in the second movie we see the effects of tony houseing the arc reactor in his chest
You wouldn't need to use a mutation or anything, it could be very well possible through gene splicing and stem cells (although a spider bite would most likely be impossible).
Actually, the fusion mini reactor solves only one minor inconvenience...
Lets start with Flying:
Unless he uses some mystical force, he need propulsion. Given the dimensions of the armour we'll have very small turbines. They would need to generate an absurd amount of pressure. Since no system is 100% efficient, those turbines would REALLY heat up and, likely, melt (and Tony with them).
So, no flying.
But that's not all folks!
Super strength via exoskeleton.
I am assuming he has material with enough structural resistance to make it really small. I am also assuming these robotic enhacements are controled via neurolinks, so as to respond in perfect harmony with his own body (or the armour would destroy his limbs).
Also, there is the leverage aspect. Although his armour is made of a fantasy alloy that withstands the pressure and has a reactor to power it...he is still dependant of basic physics like gravity.
The "SUV catch" would take him of balance...and likely destroy the pacement under his feet...
Armour resistance to impact.
I am assuming that that alloy is indestructible, no matter how thin it is.
As far as I understand, Stark is still a member of human species...with a brain inside à skull. With organs inside his chest.
This means that a .50BMG shot to his head, or being violently throw into a truck would lead to concussion e internal bleeding and organ displacement.
Same would happen with sharp U turns at Mack 4.
@@RenatoAlcantara-yd2ts unless he doesn't add shock absorbers
@@techphile3262 assuming he added some Vibranium padding...he might pull that.
We are talking magic here, since Vibranium seems to endlessly keep absorbing knynetic energy without a sweat.
Assuming an indestructible alloy, perfectly sinchronized servomotors... Vibranium absorbing the heat from the arc reactor and inertia from the fights...we still have the question of WHY ON HELL GO INSIDE THE ARMOUR.
Vanko was right...drone better.
This is neat. Thanks for posting this video; I actually thought that Iron Man might not have been able to lift that car, but now it actually makes sense! ;)
do one on captain america's shield and captain america himself.
It doesn't look like a miniaturized Tokamak, it's probably some kind of cold fusion, the same energy as the tesserac.
didn't Tony say that it'll take everyone else about 20 years to catch up to his tech? Looks like they really did the research for this movie.
So do you guys this it possible to make an arc reactor
I dont understand shit about that reaction stuff and shit... But i think it is just like the computer timelapse but it takes longer. First computers were the size of a building... Now they can be the size of your hand (raspberry pi) maybe in the future we will actually see a real arc reactor size of a hockey puck...
Even if you magically got it down to the size of a hockey puck the laws of thermo says that reactor will produce alot of heat.
ronald daugherty science had said many things for us in past and that science too had proved many things wrong that we used to believe.
Ralfh The Assassin I can agree with you on that!
Problem though is computers are Digital electronics, and it's processing power is not exactly dependent on size, (except Moors law) but power and thermonuclear electronics is more dependant on physical size, or a least energy density.
You just need the right person with the right brain to make it. It may be days or it may be year away but in time they'll come.
Hush3d Hustla I know right thet need my tech too bad
after this video, the professor proceeded down to the school basement to scream at the TA, "You imbecile! The suits not ready? Tony Stark would've finished it by now!" ... The TA: "WELL, I'M NOT TONY STARK!"
"Tony Stark was able to build this in a cave!!!! With a box of scraps!!"
@panzarw Power source: yet to be discovered.
Artificial muscles: nanofiber.
Material: some sort of alloy... maybe titanium aluminum.
hey look! i spelled pam! lol.
Thanks to the camera man for doing something a tripod could do a thousand times better
Not the flying, the small version of reactor will be hardest , once we have power source, the rest tech is already on the table .
Very smart man. Good stuff !
cant u just build a nuclear reacter and have the suit charge to the reactor and when it needs more power cant u just charge it again?
Kwang-Won Chung there Will never be batteries small enough that can hold enough power, just look at tesla, the car is completely covered with batteries yet still it’s range is still not good enough for slot of consumers
palladium, what reacts with palladium?
Heroes aren't born, they're build
A miniature fusion reactor is highly unlikely and has been discredited by many scientists, however, it is very likely that someday we will stumble upon some Super-Crystals which can be harvested for their extra-ordinary energy output. The contraption in Tony's chest would act as an inverter/amplifier of that energy, and would allow him to direct plasma discharges outwardly, creating a necessary dual purpose of 1) thrust for lift-off and super-sonic flight, and 2) for the use of the Chester as weapon.
Skander Chida A California University in Berkeley had already made a small, 4 inch reactor. It could be used like it is in the movie with years of development and design.
Thanks!
Skander Chida my opinion the arc reactor is a particular accelerator that has non elastic collisions to produce heat.
zachary jones a particle accelerator does not look like an arc reactor
how much power does it take to fly one tonne for say 3 hours?
It will not be a long while...this man drastically underestimates the acceleration of the growth of technology .
I think once scientist will figure out how to make fusion engine works...future of our kind will take next step
Fusion is not going to happen in a man portable reactor with that level of utility in the next half of the millennium at least, if it's even possible in the first place. First, we have to actually make fusion produce more energy than it takes to keep it going!
Secondly, if that reactor is 99% efficient, and only 1%, or 10000 hp is going to be wasted as heat, Stark would be experiencing what it's like to have a 7million+ watt heating element embedded in his chest; i.e., reduced to ash.
This seems credible and something I plan on in my life time. Not sure how I'd do it. But every night I go to bed, I picture my self putting the suit together. I already know I'm going to use titanium steel plating which is threat level 3 rated and can withstand multiple AK-47 rounds. Not sure about flight. Maybe introducing hydrogen and oxygen in a magnetic-vortex plasma generator turbine, or a high powered laser air-exploding turbine. Power source I haven't worked out yet
The most unbelievable thing in the movie isn’t the suit. It’s the fact that he has a hole in his chest big enough for pepper to put her hand in.
Better Living Through Technology
Well, you heard the man; time to start working on that suit.
he is using a palladium ring in hes reactor but i dont know why
you can keep all your fancy suits, weapons, whatever all i want is Jarvis
Very cool
It already is possible, has been since the 50's.
The challenge is controlling it, and harnessing its energy.
Arc reactor uses zero point energy.. Maybe this nullifies the effects of the reactors biproducts
@1161858 thats only because of in the first moviue the electro magnet was keeping out the poisen the poisen was getting in the arc reactor and was slowly toxicating and killing him
I really hope they make an iron man suit before I die that would be amazing
Can I have a few of your sources. I'm writing a speech and I'd like to include a few things from this video. Thank you
What about? Bit bazzar
I HAD a speech and I was hoping to get some sources so I could A: get "factual sources" and B: see if I can add something else into my speech
Ron F fair enough just thought it was bazzar (I cant spell sorry)
Hopes and dreams smashed!!!
NEVER GIVE UP ,NEVER SURRENDER JUST POWER THROUGH 👊👊👊👊👊
You can make it that small
@@scifirealism5943 how ? Bro
@@techphile3262 gravitational confinement.
2:55-3:05 Thats How Computers started out from what I've heard.
The first computer's dimensions were about 8 feet by 3 feet by 100 feet. It weighed about 27 tons, and took up 1800 square feet of space.
and 30 years later they were so small you could fit them in your pocket.
like calculators for instance.
Cant wait to fly to work in my Ironman suit Ha Ha!
@panzarw ive seen this nano tech battery that could be capable of controlling the power needed to operate the suit. Alright this sounds kinda simple but why not making a mini atom smasher and harness the energy created in order to power it. Controlling that much would be extremely hard if even possible.
Is it me or is every AI on a tv show is always very sarcastic like KIT from Night Rider.
My concern is the wirering, if you run that much power it will melt any small wires. lol but maybe in the future we will perfect wireless transfer of electricity just like Tesla did along time ago. he did make it work and it did send electricity to a receiver imagine no wires anymore .
@panzarw Boron Nitride is a super strong material
if you watch and read the comics you would know the arc reactor was made not as a power source intill tony did something to crate energy off of it
@panzarw Stan Lee's Superhumans found a guy that could fly. He had a home made set of wings with 4 small jet engines and a throttle to control his speed, but his body controlled his actual flight. Yay for random facts!
@tomatenomg Using Palladium!
A way to dissipate heat into another dimension so that it doesn't effect ours? Never say never :)
But can the human body take that amount powerfull movement like runing 100 miles in hour and throwing a punch with 300 miles in hour wouldn't the muscles be comepletely broken
I always assumed it was cold fusion...
Yea I think that I'll wait for something like Extremis so that I could make a suit like in Iron Man
Good expalnation
I wanna make a simple arc reactor like iron mans how should I go about doing this
Well, step one: Become wealthy.
Step zero: Figure it out! If they know, they would do it.
If you know, tell us!
Smallest arc reactor that is in the works I think is 21 feet long and wide like a 21 ft box