I think the hulkbuster would be a safer stronger goal to strive for as the increased interior space will provide a longer time period for deceleration.
Of course, but cars have crumple accommodation in order to decelerate your body slowly. If the indestructible armor is right up against you it won't protect you from crashes. As seen when War Machine crashed in Avengers Age of Ultron. If your going to wear a suit for flight I suggest a very large robot with a suspended cockpit in the core. But I would rather suggest just fly a robot remotely via VR so there is no risk to the pilot, like stark did in Spider Man homecoming.
@@dotails Im pretty sure that alot of people forget that the exoskeleton frame is designed to protect from that, Its not just a bunch of clunky metal bars that you see from In real life exoskeleton, You also have to realize that they use arc reactors which give the suits extreme power.
There are many factors in making an iron man suit. One resource I discovered that succeeds in merging these is the Dichali costume creator (check it out on google) definately the most useful resource i've seen.look at all the interesting info .
Biggest energy issue for Tony would be heat loss from the reactor in his chest. Given the energy output he mentioned in the cave when he made the first reactor, assuming even a 1% loss if heat, he would fry from the inside.
Tony's mind is way ahead of any other living engineer on this planet, Existing maths are just tools, smart minds are limited up to a point. But a visionary is like a compositor of music, unique music that is yet to be discovered, that's Tony Stark.....
Tony's mind is superior than supposedly much more advanced alien civilization? Mind to explain why none of alien civilizations shown and mentioned in the MCU has anything as technologically advanced as Iron Man suit? If you actually think Iron Man suit in the movie (especially the nanotech one) can function like shown in the movie without killing the human in it, I can't consider you as an adult. I like RDJ but Iron Man technology is mostly ass pull.
You miss one point,this armor,and tony stark are fictional,so RDJ s mind in not much bigger than ours u know,in tonly depends on us if we can create something like this or not
That would increase general strength about 30%, and stiffness a bit more. Foaming the alloys could increase strength to weight about 10 fold, but I don't think it was suggested anywhere.
Not just an inner lining alone, but if you look at the first Iron Man movie, an entire chassis with tiny built-in shock pistons was placed over his body before the iron metal exoskeleton suit
This analysis is a bit "wrong" in terms of comics. The end of US Army can be avoided because the Iron Man is property of Tony Stark and not of the government. Missing the analysis of how the Iron Man Suit is made from the comic. There are only the current and existing technology ... if it is possible create the ark reactor I think that we already have the availability of make the suit. 1- structural analysis missing about the mobility part, the evidence is at the final conclusions 2- energy analysis miss the Ark Reactor energy or how produce it. 3- thermal analysis, is related to previous point 4- ergonomic analysis ????? missing. How an human enter or "dress" the suit ? 5- biological analysis, stress during the flight, or during the usage of weapons ... when human inside needs to go in bathroom ? I hope that my suggestion helps you. Thanks
Giorgio Desideri Very astute observation. Well this video is no way a definitive and comprehensive guide but is something to get a discussion going and helping people to understand the concept slightly deeper than just the cosmetic superficial level. You are right, all these points need to be addressed. May be a future video needs to be made. If I will, I will most definitely take your points onboard. Thanks for your detailed input
Thanks. I can suggest a way for the new video, keep the structure as index, with the key points of analysis and start from the comics. Analyse the result from the comics and try to bring in the real world, executing the calculus as the comic technology exists.
Giorgio Desideri we can make the suit… but theres 2 big issues, the thiness of the exosuit to lift the suit, and the battery… but metals are simple, amix of titanium nickle alloy giving enough density but keeping a light weight body, etc
could you use reclaimed carbon atomic diamond batteries? they don't have much juice each but they are small light and last a long time. make an array of them throughout the suit for the power requirements.
There is actually such a thing as an electric propulsion system: ion thrusters. They can make thrust by ejecting a minuscule amount of mass at a very very high velocity. The main constraint for these engines today is the fact that they require so much energy per unit of thrust.
An anti-matter energy supply the size of an M&M would provide way more power than need. I mean tremendously more power. One billionth of a gram of positrons contains as much energy as 37.8 kilograms (83 pounds) of TNT. But with $250 million (U.S.) you could only produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram) it's way to costly. But if you could get that cost down this would be the ultimate power supply.
I have been trying to find info of exactly how the energy is harnessed but that info is really hard to come by. Oh by the way I'm a huge fan. Love your content!
My brain has been burning up with tons of engineering ideas in the last few weeks. Part of that is the above idea for pressurization for the body and the head, separately. The body could be set to a static pressure (with expansion for breathing allowed by a hidden expansion pocket of some sort) and the helmet would of course require a constant influx of breathable air. The body and helmet would be locked off from each other, regarding air. Breathing would be a problem, given the diminished air density with increased altitude. So, an active pressurizer (micro positive displacement compressor) could activate when outside pressure drops. It would 'overdrive' at 16-18 psi (there would be a 'wastegate' to maintain 14psi constant) accounting for the drop in pressure during each inhaled and exhaled breath. That was easy enough to figure out. The hard part, for me, is how to create a sealed inner hull which moves easily and properly for human ranges of motion, while still allowing an overlaid actuator frame, then armor.
Can we make an exo-suit? Yes. Can we make Iron Man's suit? HELL, NO! The suit endured a tank shell shot in the movie. That would require a material so strong as to act as tank armor in a very thin layer, and some material that can absorb the impact of the shell without transferring it to the user. Not going to happen anytime soon. If something like the arc reactor existed, it would be the holy grial of energy. No more problems with global warming. Incredible electric cars, or even personal planes. No need for a power grid, you can power everything with this.
You have to look at what kind of shell hit IM, if it was HE it could be possible to the suit to withstand the shot. Sabot would go straight through any armor. Iron man suits are impossible to make like the movies, you need some kind of gravitational and inertia manipulation to withstand the extreme g loads.
Yeah but if you have the weaponry you can counter the tank shot. And the chances are low to be shot by a tank if you were Iron Man. Also, as for the energy that too is possible if the suit could be re chargeable however that would consume loads of electricity and make your bill spike. It is possible though.
It's the power source that's keeping this from happening. The programming of the AI wouldn't be that good of course but it could still be nice as well as the other features. The next generation in power is pretty much what's stopping a whole bunch of super heroes scifi from coming reality like Falcons and vultures wings, green goblins glider, batmans compact handheld grappling gun etc.
A suit that locks every pivot point would protect the occupent from damage if hit and the light weight would just fling them around. Flight is not currently possiblle due to size but having some type of thruster tech would help the operator move if the weight of an item is too much for the suit to handle. The main issue one would face is the electrical system. A method of wiring the limbs etc from all external and internal errors/ damage would be the hardest thing to sort out. One stab and an arm wouldn't work or worse, the systems may malfuncion and each one of the operators fingers might get broken (or arm). Imagine being the person trapped inside when all function ceases.
I'm as far from an engineer as it gets but I found this very interesting! I had no idea the suit could be made - albeit with serious limitations. I'm certain the thrusters would not be in the same place as the comics (in the feet) but do you think small enough variations on the calfs would be possible? Would the same follow for the stabilizers (in the hands)?
The rule is that you double the diameter of the thrusters, the force of thrust goes up by four times. So it makes from sense to have few large thrusters rather than several small ones. You are right, having thrusters in the heel will make the flight more unstable. It would be more beneficial to have the thruster on the back
I am also research on this suit for about 3 years. Your video is very helpful for me.trust me one day we will do it.everything look impossible before anyone make it real.
And depending on electrical demands, there is a solution, though not a 'reactor' proper. A compact and high-output generator (standard car alternators crank out 50-70 amps @ 12 volts for years, and some can go as high as 150 amps) could be spun by a small and strong output electric motor (all alternators have to do is spin). That motor can be powered by a high density battery like used for electric bikes in the 1500w to 2500w range at 20 something volts (not as sexy as a reactor, but at least this is a plausible reality). This would power a strong and small motor at 3500 to 4000 rpm for hours. That's more than enough to create power for a number of systems, if they're built to take advantage of the amperage. And with new constructions of carbon arrays coming out every day, one or more of those could bring a meaningful electric output increase in an otherwise standard generator, even above what we have in cars now.
You would have to have non-returnable valves in place for your breathing apparatus I suppose. Lithium Sulphur batteries are up and coming technology and holds a lot of promise. Already an Unmanned aircraft called the "Zephyr" has used them with success. They are at least twice as better than Lithium Ion. Having a generator is fine but you would also have to fly with the fuel for it.
Absolutely. One-way check valves to keep flow moving directionally. The generator solution I mentioned above would not use fuel, it would use a high power battery pack. The Li-Sulphur batts you mentioned are an option, too. Hopefully soon a graphene or carbon-array battery of significant power density will be made.
Wait a minute.... Full disclosure-I am not any type of engineer, so I welcome corrections from genuinely qualified people, but this comment seems deeply flawed. If I'm reading right, you're saying using a battery to run an alternator (or similar stator/rotor-type generator device) would "create power". I don't see how. All the power you have available in the system you describe is what's contained in the battery. The alternator would juggle your output in terms of amperage and voltage, but it would not "create" a single additional erg of power other than what's already in the battery. Just use the output of the battery directly, and if it needs rectifying in some way, I think there are solid-state ways to do that. Spinning an alternator would also lose you a great deal of battery power that could otherwise be used directly to run the suit systems via friction losses in the alternator's moving parts, hysteresis, and probably two dozen other things I don't understand. Using electricity you've already got in a battery to run a generator seems to me to be a pointless (and actually counter-productive) extra step. Again, if I've misunderstood what you were trying to describe, or if I've gotten a concept wrong, I welcome any corrections.
The biggest roadblocks are consistent energy supply and the compact thrusters. Everything else in the suit, like hud, automation, weapons, enhanced limbs and the outer shell are all possible. I would like to think in the next decade a land based suit with capabilities like this could be possible with technology always getting faster, smaller and more efficient.
mark 1 didn't have supersonic, hovering or flares. just Armour and weapons, with rocket propulsion. the mark 2 had actual flight (not supersonic) and just the repulsors for combat. so no weapons, or flares just armour, and hovering. the mark 3 finally had supersonic, armour, hovering, weapons, and flares. so your statement about what the suits had only covers the mark 3 and beyond.
It has to use nuclear energy, and there has to be some sort of cooling process we haven’t yet discovered to keep it contained, and some sort of protective lining to protect against radiation.
I've spent a lot of time thinking about what a massive change it would make to our world if we were to make a sudden huge breakthrough in battery energy density. We're making good incremental improvements, but imagine what would be possible if someone invented a battery tomorrow with 100, 200, or more times the energy density of our current best.
Combustion fuels usually yield an efficiency of 20-30% Hydrogen fuel cells (anion exchange) yield as much as 40KWh/kg with efficiencies seen between 50-80%
By “due to the laws of thermodynamics” do you just mean it’ll get really hot? Or is there something specific about entropy or compression heating that would specifically affect a theoretical reactor of this size?
How about solid-state batteries or supercapacitors to power the suit? The former is being developed currently by John B. Goodenough (the guy that made lithium ion batteries practical and invented RAM), and the latter is being worked on to achieve higher energy density. Speaking of higher energy density, solid-state batteries have about the same energy density as lithium sulfur batteries, and they can be damaged without exploding. And a battery-powered iron man suit with ducted propellers for flight in many ways sounds cooler (literally!) than a suit that uses jet thrusters to fly!
What about some kind of vast high intensity solar panel style energy apparatus designed throughout the suit, which could absorb solar/light energy via the outer layers of the suit, which could be incorporated into already existing energy power sources (batteries, etc), situated within/throughout the suit; could allow for seamless integration of the solar power into the battery to fortify/enhance its power...Wow!! Said all that in one breath! No more martinis so early in the day! Apologize for ranting. Loved the video. Great work!
There is at most just 1000 Watts of solar energy that falls on a meter square area during peak times. The exposed surface of the suit to the sun at any given time would be less than 2 m2. Solar panels are at most 23% efficient. So overall 500Watts of energy can be recouped. This is not much compared to the energy required by the thrusters. Thanks
A couple of nitpicks about the MCU and the Mk I to XLVI suits lore, but this mostly lines up. As in Iron Man 1, the greatest issue for creating these suits is the power supply.
Thank you! Much appreciated. You might also want to check out Science of Spiderman video which is not as popular. ua-cam.com/video/X6F0J726_yQ/v-deo.html And this one too on Bio Inspired Engineering ua-cam.com/video/FtWhC3l7Ky4/v-deo.html Thanks once again. It is feedback like this that makes me want to do more
All right. Before I start the video, I'm gonna say something first. Now I've read the comments, talking about the energy problem for the suit. All right, I get that. We need tons of energy right? Why not like put super capacitors around the body instead of just like, one arc reactor on the chest? You can have one super capacitor on both arms, 2 more super capacitors on the shoulders, and one on the chest, 3 at the back, and 2 at the thighs. Now I know what you're thinking, what if it gets hot? Simple, you put a coolant system. And that's it. Though I imagine cooling fans wouldn't work, so why not put in some tiny nitrogen cooling system in there too? What about protecting the user? Titanium sounds like it should be enough. Lightweight and durable. Like seriously. You're in a suit of armor, and just a man ... Normal human with an exosuit. No normal person would have the courage to engage tanks... Well unless you're crazy brave, and crazy. Just make the suit bulletproof. I don't see a need it should protect the user from missile-.... Oh wait it should fly. I think you're better off trying to dodge them rather than taking the full brunt of it head on. How would it fly? Well, technically speaking, iron man uses tiny explosions to propel him forward. Like in rockets and missiles. So how do you do that? I couldn't really see electricity as fuel tho.... Sooo... Nuclear energy? I mean it does go boom I guess. What do you guys think?
Lockheed martin has made their atom battery, given that it can only harnesses 1500 mah over 7 hours it should be possible to do something crazier if they planned on it being consumer why not something remarkable on a greater budget
For the armor itself, carbon nanotube metal matrix composite would actually prove far more effective than conventional titanium alloys. The comic version of the Iron Man armor is actually nitinol not titanium/platinum which would prove far to heavy to be practical.
i think tungsten titanium alloy is best as it's soft and completely shock absorbant;and you could also plate it with kevlar or a new corboxylic acid+benzeme like kevlar could be invented
Imagine this tech in mass-effect. You have the answer to the suit. Super light metal for armor, and Eezzo for lift and flight assist. No AI, but Virtual Intelligence can be just as good.
Oops left out the newest "peltier junction/thermocouples". Why waste free energy if you don't have to? And yes they are quite light. Heat normally lost in the combustion process. Kevlar wrap also forgotten in a couple specific areas. Body armor that doubles as a wing. Or the other way around depending
In the comics Tony created a type of bacteria that could ate/consume iron and the bacteria's waste(poop) was a different type of stronger, harder, lighter, more flexible metal that also had the ability to collapse onto inself (giving it the ability to expand like transformers).
We can make an Iron Man suit. What we can't do is provide motors capable of creating force 100 times the strength of a human, and the speed/mobility of movement. In the films the CGI portrays him able to move faster than he could outside of the suit, while also having the strength. Our only obstacle here is power to maintain these.
i had made an ark reactor{seriously},cheap,less than 270 dollars to make,small as an backpack. but it has some defects,im researching on it. may be available in 7 months.
You forget about pass through shock systems... Those systems are capable of passing the suit's shock impacts throughout the suit mitigating any damage taken by the suit...
What about a blended system for power generation that relies at least in part on the wearer? I'm talking a combination of kinetic (as in the same basic tech as kinetic watches), thermoelectric (body heat), solar, as well as batteries? Or any combination thereof. And as for the batteries, there's been some interesting advances with graphene, lately.
When cyclist are producing peak power, i.e, when they are cycling really fast, they can go up to 200 Watt continuous energy. This can only last a few seconds
Uranium emits alpha particles which isn’t harmful, however emits low levels of gamma radiation. That means each time you put on the suit you’d absorb a low level of gamma. But with time you’d feel the effects and die. Something should be made to counter it.
You should have done the energy calculations for his suit to perform in the real world, you could have discussed technologies that might work today including conceptual tech.
When Tony's character was conceived, adamantium was a metal from outer space. It was only later that it was shown that the metal is also mined on earth. The Black panther for example has huge reverses of it. But yes its a good question, when adamantium is now as easily available in the Marvel Universe, it should be used for the suit
I believe the iron man repulsor is some sort of thermal rocket nozzle that uses energy derived from the reactor, to heat up gas and expand to high velocities. I don’t there’s room to fit a turbine on a hand palm though. This both works as a thruster, and a weapon. The fictional arc reactor was a compact nuclear fusion device that we might not be able to make within a century.
2:30 if I remember right the move changed so that the suit is bild of a titanium alloy. Except mark 1, they probably used what they could get there hands on.
sounds great but that won't be bullet resistant, much less bullet proof. He'd be better off making it from plate armor instead, since that would stop more. If we can ever mass-produce sheet graphene, we could make layered armor with it.
Synergy Files You are talking about our body moving at a speed of missile. I don't know how to calculate knots but that's a serious g force to absorb in that suit
Are there any materials that are strong enough to withstand the impact of missiles like in the iron man film? And also good video btw, u earned yourself a new subscriber
Evans Corcher Thank you. There is no single material that can withstand such impact loads unless they are coushioned. For example in space, there is space debris moving around that has a linear velocity of more than 25000 mph. The only way to withstand such debris to have cushion material in between sucessive layers of metal. The international space station moves out of the way of space debris. If you watch the initial scenes of the movie Gravity, you will notice the damaging effect of projectiles at high speed. There is no single material but a combination of materials that can stop it
While the general public may not have access to technology such as this, I believe there are some black budget programs capable of making something close to it. We more or less do have the technological capability of creating such things, but they won't let us have any access to it because it would take energy sources that would put the fossil fuel companies out of business. We could and should have efficient electric cars by now, but money is what really rules this world and the fossil fuel industry has more power than god in that respect. You can thank them for pretty much all the problems in the modern era. Even if someone did invent an arc reactor they would stop at nothing to supress it's existence and very likely already have countless times.
Boron as a FUEL. The next big thing. As a fuel source. Redundant SMA's. Lithium Hydroxide in pockets in a layer between two skins. Use the water created in the carbon dioxide removal to mix with the H2 producing compound. You now have boron AND hydrogen as a fuel source along with lithium ion batteries. Titanium alloy shell with carbon fiber bracing. Wicking cloth to move water and sweat away from the pilot/driver. Also , though I can't go into details , there is L A R G E push into something called M.E.H.A.S which gives incredible strength in a quite small package. LOL however 18 relief valves of various brands and pressures have exploded quite violently except one. Just info
The real question about flying is HOW ON EARTH are we gonna get such powerful technology to be so SMALL and convenient? You can't have an Iron Man suit where each component for flight is the size of your head or larger.
Jason Skywalker I think it can be done. I thought hover-boards would never exist. After that came about I couldn’t think of anything we can’t do beside time travel and light speed travel anytime soon
before going into all the fancy stuff, u should have checked if the actual exoskeleton could be made. meaning if u can actually make something so "tight" on the human body that can give u the mechanical advantages of the suit. u only briefly went trough the inner and outer shell, what about the actual skeleton that gives u the power to lift cars and obviously run faster and longer. the mechanics need to be met before u go into the tech and sofware
Exo-skeletons like Gym suits have already been made for deep sea exploration. You are right though. The GYM suit is not very ergonomic. There has been a project done by the US military on exo skeleton. Its called the TALOS project. Not much details of that are available as it was confidential. Exo skeletons however have been made in real life that allow people to lift heavy objects
Barely anybody is considering a layer of graphene to help with armour. Probably because it’s still technically experimental, but scientists say it could stop bullets Edit: whilst being thin and lightweight
Mr Boombastic also in order to improve energy sustainability you would need CNT (carbon nano tube) muscle packs to have a sufficient power to weight ratio plus the cnt would enable the suit to have the power of a jackhammer in every limb
You know the way you can layer the suit. Put a gold titanium alloy for armor. Under that, graphene to make it completely bullet resistent. And then under that put sorbothane for safety.
Polonium micro fusion reactor of some sort originally (later changed to some fictional element that wasn't as DANGEROUS). A Shrunk down version of the test reactor Iron Monger has an argument with a fella about seems to be what it is - I am amused by the idea of trying to miniaturise a fusion reactor though - that has a a feeling of improbability about it due to not being large enough to protect those around it from stray high energy particle decay. Unless the magnetic field is somehow able to contain them inside and only allow harmless omissions like Neutrinos of something like that. But it's fiction so it's all in fun - But it does make me wonder what the limit of how small you could potentially make a fusion reactor would be (when such things exist) - they might be useful for powering aircraft so large they don't need to land, or city sized ships or Space Craft I guess.
I mean the whole point of Tony Stark is that his mind is capable of making technology far better than what we have today. So right there this video is kinda pointless 😂😂
it can be built.
all you need is a cave and a box of scraps.
and most importantly a brain like tony stark ( I know i am late here )
@@shiv3710 and that's how you ruin a joke. Great work
@@shiv3710 or just a Tony Stark would do
And the certainty that if you don't, you'll be killed.
+ a yinsen
Tony was able to built this in a cave, with box of scrap
Tanwie Haryanto well, I'm not Tony Stark
*build
*a box of scrap
Tony Stark was able to build this in a box! With a cave of scraps!
@@southglare_axe7397
Is your Tony a cat?
Actually Tony says (at the end of first movie i think) that its made of gold titanium alloy.
during his build process of making mark 2 in the middle of the first movie, he makes a remark to JARVIS about making it out of a gold/titanium alloy.
i think he changed to gold titanium alloy from chrome and titanium-steel plating cause of the ice problem of the mark 2
Arda Özcan also he says it when he makes mk3
The good thing is the gold titanium alloy is real.
Arda Özcan I
I think the hulkbuster would be a safer stronger goal to strive for as the increased interior space will provide a longer time period for deceleration.
dotails
Yeah. You could legit just wear a seat belt.
Of course, but cars have crumple accommodation in order to decelerate your body slowly. If the indestructible armor is right up against you it won't protect you from crashes. As seen when War Machine crashed in Avengers Age of Ultron. If your going to wear a suit for flight I suggest a very large robot with a suspended cockpit in the core. But I would rather suggest just fly a robot remotely via VR so there is no risk to the pilot, like stark did in Spider Man homecoming.
dotails hulk buster has spare parts in a offsite location.
@@dotails Im pretty sure that alot of people forget that the exoskeleton frame is designed to protect from that, Its not just a bunch of clunky metal bars that you see from In real life exoskeleton, You also have to realize that they use arc reactors which give the suits extreme power.
@@Fraccuppino if I had that much energy at my engineering disposal I would use it to magnetically suspend the passenger in an inner shell of the suit.
1:45 Technically, the Mark II was only built flight testing, not even sustained flight. Basically, there are no weapons other than the repulsors
True.
And MK1 is incapable of supersonic flight too...
@@kerbodynamicx472 forgot what happened? Let me remember you
"*thrusters lift off* (*seconds later*) BAM"
@@jellymatsuryuka6853 the thrusters otherwise flew or the fuel ran out
Talented Rich kids be like
"Great weekend project "
do you mean Phineas and Ferb?
There are many factors in making an iron man suit. One resource I discovered that succeeds in merging these is the Dichali costume creator (check it out on google) definately the most useful resource i've seen.look at all the interesting info .
@@josef.torrealba6992 biggest problem is power source
Actually the Hacksmith have been working on this sort of project...not completed yet
After 2 years, UA-cam gave me notification of the replys😂
Biggest energy issue for Tony would be heat loss from the reactor in his chest. Given the energy output he mentioned in the cave when he made the first reactor, assuming even a 1% loss if heat, he would fry from the inside.
Apparently it is cold fusion
@@ayooshiyer8621 but radioactive
Tony's mind is way ahead of any other living engineer on this planet, Existing maths are just tools, smart minds are limited up to a point. But a visionary is like a compositor of music, unique music that is yet to be discovered, that's Tony Stark.....
Tony's mind is superior than supposedly much more advanced alien civilization? Mind to explain why none of alien civilizations shown and mentioned in the MCU has anything as technologically advanced as Iron Man suit?
If you actually think Iron Man suit in the movie (especially the nanotech one) can function like shown in the movie without killing the human in it, I can't consider you as an adult. I like RDJ but Iron Man technology is mostly ass pull.
Acctually 8m gonna be smarter then tony stark soon.
You miss one point,this armor,and tony stark are fictional,so RDJ s mind in not much bigger than ours u know,in tonly depends on us if we can create something like this or not
I study as much as possible to be an engineer and I'm 14
Be a Mechanical Engineer. Its the best
Synergy Files thank you again I will😂
as long as you love it, and you do not live in a 3rd world country
medo sam You will be shocked about the 3rd world, remember this day, and wait.
what its going to build a nuclear missile? you can spit at my grandchildren grave when it happen
If we’re gonna make an iron man suit, we need an energy source that stores energy and changes it.
Without cremating the operator.
Dennis Svensson that’s pretty important to.
Use MA Energy
Energy can’t be created.
If you can create lots of energy in real time continuously then you don't need to store it
By this logic, it should be similarly possible to make an artillary suit, a là War Machine
MisterE Gamer we have the TALOS suite on the way which is pretty much Iron man.
Didn't tony in the first movie mention using fiber reinforced titanium to keep up the strength with thinner lighter alloys?
yes
That would increase general strength about 30%, and stiffness a bit more. Foaming the alloys could increase strength to weight about 10 fold, but I don't think it was suggested anywhere.
It should be noted that for the first 1.5 movies, his suit was essentially powered by palladium
Arc Reactor is powered by Palladiun. But in real life, Palladium is cancerogenic
@@xxEmmankunnArt Im pretty sure you can synthesize it tho meaning some sort of gas as you cast it to clean or whatever it does to the palladium.
Not just an inner lining alone, but if you look at the first Iron Man movie, an entire chassis with tiny built-in shock pistons was placed over his body before the iron metal exoskeleton suit
So tony should now be "Titaniun Man"?
CaneLose Al-BUM-rez why not. Better than rusty old Iron man
GOLD TITANIUM man!!
CaneLose Al-BUM-rez because they had no clue about titanium when he was named.
Since titanium was discovered in 1791, I daresay "they" DID have a clue.
We are IF nah.Iron Man just sounds more badass
This analysis is a bit "wrong" in terms of comics. The end of US Army can be avoided because the Iron Man is property of Tony Stark and not of the government.
Missing the analysis of how the Iron Man Suit is made from the comic. There are only the current and existing technology ... if it is possible create the ark reactor I think that we already have the availability of make the suit.
1- structural analysis missing about the mobility part, the evidence is at the final conclusions
2- energy analysis miss the Ark Reactor energy or how produce it.
3- thermal analysis, is related to previous point
4- ergonomic analysis ????? missing. How an human enter or "dress" the suit ?
5- biological analysis, stress during the flight, or during the usage of weapons ... when human inside needs to go in bathroom ?
I hope that my suggestion helps you.
Thanks
Giorgio Desideri Very astute observation. Well this video is no way a definitive and comprehensive guide but is something to get a discussion going and helping people to understand the concept slightly deeper than just the cosmetic superficial level. You are right, all these points need to be addressed. May be a future video needs to be made. If I will, I will most definitely take your points onboard. Thanks for your detailed input
Thanks. I can suggest a way for the new video, keep the structure as index, with the key points of analysis and start from the comics.
Analyse the result from the comics and try to bring in the real world, executing the calculus as the comic technology exists.
Giorgio Desideri Thanks. I will bear that in mind. Cheers!
what a surprise a comic book nerd complaining about accuracy... Again seriously no offence it gets annoying
Giorgio Desideri we can make the suit… but theres 2 big issues, the thiness of the exosuit to lift the suit, and the battery… but metals are simple, amix of titanium nickle alloy giving enough density but keeping a light weight body, etc
could you use reclaimed carbon atomic diamond batteries? they don't have much juice each but they are small light and last a long time. make an array of them throughout the suit for the power requirements.
They don't have the energy density
Two things prevent an iron man suit from being made, an extremely powerful compact power source and generating thrust with out the need to burn fuel
There is actually such a thing as an electric propulsion system: ion thrusters. They can make thrust by ejecting a minuscule amount of mass at a very very high velocity. The main constraint for these engines today is the fact that they require so much energy per unit of thrust.
We can use super capacitors with graphine electrodes for Power up the suit they have much higher energy density than conventional batteries ...
Harish Kumar K 025 you need the energy density of nuclear power and the power density of Supercapacitors to power a suit like that tho
Very impressive engineering analysis but I really find your ability to project a consistent handwriting throughout this analysis more impressive
Any body watcing in 2019 after endgame😂😂😂😂
But i haven't seen it
Any dead or alive body.
Just correcting your english ☺
An anti-matter energy supply the size of an M&M would provide way more power than need. I mean tremendously more power. One billionth of a gram of positrons contains as much energy as 37.8 kilograms (83 pounds) of TNT. But with $250 million (U.S.) you could only produce 10 milligrams of positrons (equivalent to $25 billion per gram) it's way to costly. But if you could get that cost down this would be the ultimate power supply.
+Dee Broschart True Anti matter packs a lot of energy but the equipment required to harness it would not fit in the suit.
I have been trying to find info of exactly how the energy is harnessed but that info is really hard to come by. Oh by the way I'm a huge fan. Love your content!
of course it could be fully sealed, if you take chest expansion into account for the body, and create a positive displacement air influx for the head.
Great idea! Chest to operate as a pump :)
My brain has been burning up with tons of engineering ideas in the last few weeks. Part of that is the above idea for pressurization for the body and the head, separately. The body could be set to a static pressure (with expansion for breathing allowed by a hidden expansion pocket of some sort) and the helmet would of course require a constant influx of breathable air. The body and helmet would be locked off from each other, regarding air. Breathing would be a problem, given the diminished air density with increased altitude. So, an active pressurizer (micro positive displacement compressor) could activate when outside pressure drops. It would 'overdrive' at 16-18 psi (there would be a 'wastegate' to maintain 14psi constant) accounting for the drop in pressure during each inhaled and exhaled breath. That was easy enough to figure out. The hard part, for me, is how to create a sealed inner hull which moves easily and properly for human ranges of motion, while still allowing an overlaid actuator frame, then armor.
Thank you for the support, though let me explain better above...^^^
davidsirmons join with other engineer friends and figure out and then start your own company take your idea to potensial investor's
Can we make an exo-suit? Yes. Can we make Iron Man's suit? HELL, NO!
The suit endured a tank shell shot in the movie. That would require a material so strong as to act as tank armor in a very thin layer, and some material that can absorb the impact of the shell without transferring it to the user. Not going to happen anytime soon.
If something like the arc reactor existed, it would be the holy grial of energy. No more problems with global warming. Incredible electric cars, or even personal planes. No need for a power grid, you can power everything with this.
Holy fuck, is your last name actually "Rapetti"? Hahaha damn. I feel bad for you
True. The arc reactor is something special. Know what’s more special? Water. I heard some guy could drive a car that could rely on only water.
We can..coz everything is possible
You have to look at what kind of shell hit IM, if it was HE it could be possible to the suit to withstand the shot. Sabot would go straight through any armor. Iron man suits are impossible to make like the movies, you need some kind of gravitational and inertia manipulation to withstand the extreme g loads.
Yeah but if you have the weaponry you can counter the tank shot. And the chances are low to be shot by a tank if you were Iron Man. Also, as for the energy that too is possible if the suit could be re chargeable however that would consume loads of electricity and make your bill spike. It is possible though.
without flight an ironman suit is completely possible
without flight an Ironman suit isn't an Ironman suit
Pranav Moghe yea it’s otherwise boring and retarded
@@pranavmoghe3192 I know Im late, but Mark V had no flight.
There a real life Ironman bullet-proof and blastproof suit which can fly. but it can't destroy stuff
What about the energy reactor?
If every engineer and scientists in this globe work together it can be made
It's the power source that's keeping this from happening. The programming of the AI wouldn't be that good of course but it could still be nice as well as the other features. The next generation in power is pretty much what's stopping a whole bunch of super heroes scifi from coming reality like Falcons and vultures wings, green goblins glider, batmans compact handheld grappling gun etc.
Naah, Stanes suit was build by chief engineers and it was still shit
Thermal transferable coolant absorbs heat from all outside temperatures and is compressed for heat and power.
everything can be achieved only the power aspect is difficult
And fitting thrusters
Really only probs that I have to make one
In the movies it's made of gold titanium alloy. It also said so in the jarvis app under the mark 2
A suit that locks every pivot point would protect the occupent from damage if hit and the light weight would just fling them around. Flight is not currently possiblle due to size but having some type of thruster tech would help the operator move if the weight of an item is too much for the suit to handle. The main issue one would face is the electrical system. A method of wiring the limbs etc from all external and internal errors/ damage would be the hardest thing to sort out. One stab and an arm wouldn't work or worse, the systems may malfuncion and each one of the operators fingers might get broken (or arm). Imagine being the person trapped inside when all function ceases.
Good point about the wiring issues and the malfunction
People : I will become engineer and make
ironMan suite.
Me. : I will become a doctor and become doctor strange.
I'm as far from an engineer as it gets but I found this very interesting! I had no idea the suit could be made - albeit with serious limitations. I'm certain the thrusters would not be in the same place as the comics (in the feet) but do you think small enough variations on the calfs would be possible? Would the same follow for the stabilizers (in the hands)?
The rule is that you double the diameter of the thrusters, the force of thrust goes up by four times. So it makes from sense to have few large thrusters rather than several small ones. You are right, having thrusters in the heel will make the flight more unstable. It would be more beneficial to have the thruster on the back
I am also research on this suit for about 3 years. Your video is very helpful for me.trust me one day we will do it.everything look impossible before anyone make it real.
What are the books do you refer for your research???
And depending on electrical demands, there is a solution, though not a 'reactor' proper. A compact and high-output generator (standard car alternators crank out 50-70 amps @ 12 volts for years, and some can go as high as 150 amps) could be spun by a small and strong output electric motor (all alternators have to do is spin). That motor can be powered by a high density battery like used for electric bikes in the 1500w to 2500w range at 20 something volts (not as sexy as a reactor, but at least this is a plausible reality). This would power a strong and small motor at 3500 to 4000 rpm for hours. That's more than enough to create power for a number of systems, if they're built to take advantage of the amperage. And with new constructions of carbon arrays coming out every day, one or more of those could bring a meaningful electric output increase in an otherwise standard generator, even above what we have in cars now.
You would have to have non-returnable valves in place for your breathing apparatus I suppose. Lithium Sulphur batteries are up and coming technology and holds a lot of promise. Already an Unmanned aircraft called the "Zephyr" has used them with success. They are at least twice as better than Lithium Ion. Having a generator is fine but you would also have to fly with the fuel for it.
Absolutely. One-way check valves to keep flow moving directionally. The generator solution I mentioned above would not use fuel, it would use a high power battery pack. The Li-Sulphur batts you mentioned are an option, too. Hopefully soon a graphene or carbon-array battery of significant power density will be made.
Out of curiosity, are you involved in engineering, carbon-tech, or electronics? You seem to have a solid grasp of functional design.
Thank you. I am a Mechanical Engineer by education and work for a battery-pack design company in UK.
Wait a minute.... Full disclosure-I am not any type of engineer, so I welcome corrections from genuinely qualified people, but this comment seems deeply flawed. If I'm reading right, you're saying using a battery to run an alternator (or similar stator/rotor-type generator device) would "create power". I don't see how. All the power you have available in the system you describe is what's contained in the battery. The alternator would juggle your output in terms of amperage and voltage, but it would not "create" a single additional erg of power other than what's already in the battery. Just use the output of the battery directly, and if it needs rectifying in some way, I think there are solid-state ways to do that. Spinning an alternator would also lose you a great deal of battery power that could otherwise be used directly to run the suit systems via friction losses in the alternator's moving parts, hysteresis, and probably two dozen other things I don't understand. Using electricity you've already got in a battery to run a generator seems to me to be a pointless (and actually counter-productive) extra step. Again, if I've misunderstood what you were trying to describe, or if I've gotten a concept wrong, I welcome any corrections.
The biggest roadblocks are consistent energy supply and the compact thrusters. Everything else in the suit, like hud, automation, weapons, enhanced limbs and the outer shell are all possible. I would like to think in the next decade a land based suit with capabilities like this could be possible with technology always getting faster, smaller and more efficient.
mark 1 didn't have supersonic, hovering or flares.
just Armour and weapons, with rocket propulsion.
the mark 2 had actual flight (not supersonic)
and just the repulsors for combat.
so no weapons, or flares
just armour, and hovering.
the mark 3 finally had supersonic, armour, hovering, weapons, and flares.
so your statement about what the suits had only covers the mark 3 and beyond.
Very astute observation sir
good video though :)
@__ nope he didn't but I also think the mark 2 could have gone on supersonic flight since it was the exact same power source than the mark3
It has to use nuclear energy, and there has to be some sort of cooling process we haven’t yet discovered to keep it contained, and some sort of protective lining to protect against radiation.
Supercapacitors!! For energy
Not a bad option but still the energy density for them is too low.
Just a story cannot reproduce iron man suit
I've spent a lot of time thinking about what a massive change it would make to our world if we were to make a sudden huge breakthrough in battery energy density. We're making good incremental improvements, but imagine what would be possible if someone invented a battery tomorrow with 100, 200, or more times the energy density of our current best.
Super capacitor would be heavier than the suit
No mention of graphene, carbyne or self repair materials.
Combustion fuels usually yield an efficiency of 20-30%
Hydrogen fuel cells (anion exchange) yield as much as 40KWh/kg with efficiencies seen between 50-80%
arc reactor of that size is not possible even if it is..it can't be put in the suit since it will melt due to the laws of thermodynamics.
the reactor should be a cold fusion power
By “due to the laws of thermodynamics” do you just mean it’ll get really hot? Or is there something specific about entropy or compression heating that would specifically affect a theoretical reactor of this size?
How about solid-state batteries or supercapacitors to power the suit? The former is being developed currently by John B. Goodenough (the guy that made lithium ion batteries practical and invented RAM), and the latter is being worked on to achieve higher energy density. Speaking of higher energy density, solid-state batteries have about the same energy density as lithium sulfur batteries, and they can be damaged without exploding.
And a battery-powered iron man suit with ducted propellers for flight in many ways sounds cooler (literally!) than a suit that uses jet thrusters to fly!
What about some kind of vast high intensity solar panel style energy apparatus designed throughout the suit, which could absorb solar/light energy via the outer layers of the suit, which could be incorporated into already existing energy power sources (batteries, etc), situated within/throughout the suit; could allow for seamless integration of the solar power into the battery to fortify/enhance its power...Wow!! Said all that in one breath! No more martinis so early in the day! Apologize for ranting. Loved the video. Great work!
There is at most just 1000 Watts of solar energy that falls on a meter square area during peak times. The exposed surface of the suit to the sun at any given time would be less than 2 m2. Solar panels are at most 23% efficient. So overall 500Watts of energy can be recouped. This is not much compared to the energy required by the thrusters. Thanks
A couple of nitpicks about the MCU and the Mk I to XLVI suits lore, but this mostly lines up. As in Iron Man 1, the greatest issue for creating these suits is the power supply.
Thanks man i love this video .
And congratulations you earn a new subscriber
Thank you! Much appreciated. You might also want to check out Science of Spiderman video which is not as popular. ua-cam.com/video/X6F0J726_yQ/v-deo.html
And this one too on Bio Inspired Engineering ua-cam.com/video/FtWhC3l7Ky4/v-deo.html
Thanks once again. It is feedback like this that makes me want to do more
All right. Before I start the video, I'm gonna say something first. Now I've read the comments, talking about the energy problem for the suit. All right, I get that. We need tons of energy right? Why not like put super capacitors around the body instead of just like, one arc reactor on the chest? You can have one super capacitor on both arms, 2 more super capacitors on the shoulders, and one on the chest, 3 at the back, and 2 at the thighs. Now I know what you're thinking, what if it gets hot? Simple, you put a coolant system. And that's it. Though I imagine cooling fans wouldn't work, so why not put in some tiny nitrogen cooling system in there too? What about protecting the user? Titanium sounds like it should be enough. Lightweight and durable. Like seriously. You're in a suit of armor, and just a man ... Normal human with an exosuit. No normal person would have the courage to engage tanks... Well unless you're crazy brave, and crazy. Just make the suit bulletproof. I don't see a need it should protect the user from missile-.... Oh wait it should fly. I think you're better off trying to dodge them rather than taking the full brunt of it head on. How would it fly? Well, technically speaking, iron man uses tiny explosions to propel him forward. Like in rockets and missiles. So how do you do that? I couldn't really see electricity as fuel tho.... Sooo... Nuclear energy? I mean it does go boom I guess. What do you guys think?
Lockheed martin has made their atom battery, given that it can only harnesses 1500 mah over 7 hours it should be possible to do something crazier if they planned on it being consumer why not something remarkable on a greater budget
For the armor itself, carbon nanotube metal matrix composite would actually prove far more effective than conventional titanium alloys. The comic version of the Iron Man armor is actually nitinol not titanium/platinum which would prove far to heavy to be practical.
True. Carbon nano tube tech is still evolving. It has so far proven to be the paradigm shift in the way we think of things.
The metal you are looking for is in wakanda. That is the answer. 😂😂🤣
World's Most Informative Video i ever seen.
i think tungsten titanium alloy is best as it's soft and completely shock absorbant;and you could also plate it with kevlar or a new corboxylic acid+benzeme like kevlar could be invented
imsam Brandt also heavy as fuck and would require more energy to move around
Nah. Soft is bad for the outer shell. You want hard and strong
The Iron man suit will be a melting pot of all the science we've studied. Just needs a person to do it .
Tony Stark says in the end of Iron Man that the suit is actually made of a gold-titanium alloy.
It's partially
Imagine this tech in mass-effect. You have the answer to the suit. Super light metal for armor, and Eezzo for lift and flight assist. No AI, but Virtual Intelligence can be just as good.
When will people realize that music in the video makes it painful to listen to? Jeezus!
It has been realized at least on this channel. No music in later videos
Oops left out the newest "peltier junction/thermocouples". Why waste free energy if you don't have to? And yes they are quite light. Heat normally lost in the combustion process. Kevlar wrap also forgotten in a couple specific areas. Body armor that doubles as a wing. Or the other way around depending
tony stark's arc reactor is made using a palladium element though, synthesized with a prism energy using a particle accelerator.
He specifically says that it's made of a titanium alloy in the movie. Civilians came up with the "iron man" name..
this makes me think if iron man's name was "Alloy Bot"
wow finally we know what ironman is made up of
with not enough iron
Its a Iron-deficient Iron Man
@@martinanastacio5040 lol 😂
In the comics Tony created a type of bacteria that could ate/consume iron and the bacteria's waste(poop) was a different type of stronger, harder, lighter, more flexible metal that also had the ability to collapse onto inself (giving it the ability to expand like transformers).
Why use Titanium and Sorbathane and those things.... use 2 layers of Fiber Glass with 1 layer of sorbathane. What’s the problem in doing this?
Fibre glass has good tensile strength but not good shear strength
We can make an Iron Man suit. What we can't do is provide motors capable of creating force 100 times the strength of a human, and the speed/mobility of movement.
In the films the CGI portrays him able to move faster than he could outside of the suit, while also having the strength.
Our only obstacle here is power to maintain these.
The power source is the problem, not the suit. He need to have a small size power source, powerful enough to keep the suit up in the sky for log.
Alexutz CTN The suit isnt possible to make. Atleast yet
ManuTheMLG duct tape plus 2 magnets
Power source, strong enough armor to withstand Thor, and a way to not turn into mush when accelerating/decelerating. So, impossible in other words.
Yes
i had made an ark reactor{seriously},cheap,less than 270 dollars to make,small as an backpack. but it has some defects,im researching on it. may be available in 7 months.
You forget about pass through shock systems...
Those systems are capable of passing the suit's shock impacts throughout the suit mitigating any damage taken by the suit...
What about a blended system for power generation that relies at least in part on the wearer? I'm talking a combination of kinetic (as in the same basic tech as kinetic watches), thermoelectric (body heat), solar, as well as batteries? Or any combination thereof. And as for the batteries, there's been some interesting advances with graphene, lately.
When cyclist are producing peak power, i.e, when they are cycling really fast, they can go up to 200 Watt continuous energy. This can only last a few seconds
Uranium emits alpha particles which isn’t harmful, however emits low levels of gamma radiation. That means each time you put on the suit you’d absorb a low level of gamma. But with time you’d feel the effects and die. Something should be made to counter it.
In the movie he uses a titanium alloy
You should have done the energy calculations for his suit to perform in the real world, you could have discussed technologies that might work today including conceptual tech.
Why don't tony uses adamantium to make the suit
When Tony's character was conceived, adamantium was a metal from outer space. It was only later that it was shown that the metal is also mined on earth. The Black panther for example has huge reverses of it. But yes its a good question, when adamantium is now as easily available in the Marvel Universe, it should be used for the suit
Exactly my point it could be a good advantage againts thanos in infinity war i guess!! Who knows
He has a vibranium suite.
Cost.
It's heavy af. Wolverine is as heavy as the motorcycle he rides.
I believe the iron man repulsor is some sort of thermal rocket nozzle that uses energy derived from the reactor, to heat up gas and expand to high velocities. I don’t there’s room to fit a turbine on a hand palm though. This both works as a thruster, and a weapon. The fictional arc reactor was a compact nuclear fusion device that we might not be able to make within a century.
we should fund microsoft tech support for some real iron man suits
2:30 if I remember right the move changed so that the suit is bild of a titanium alloy. Except mark 1, they probably used what they could get there hands on.
you do realise that his suits are made from gold titanium alloy
Yes in the comics
sounds great but that won't be bullet resistant, much less bullet proof. He'd be better off making it from plate armor instead, since that would stop more. If we can ever mass-produce sheet graphene, we could make layered armor with it.
Mohd Ahmad actually there was news several months ago about a new gold titanium discovery - which would put it around 200,000 psi approx.
Honestly ive been thinking about how cool it would be to make his watch glove he had in captain america civil war.
C'mon analyse the endgame suit now
endgame material suit is 3000 pure love
@@ProjectRizaRiza Love and tears.
How would you constantly levitate n fly without wings ? Human body design is not an air floater.
Debasish Sundar Ray Thrust
Synergy Files You are talking about our body moving at a speed of missile. I don't know how to calculate knots but that's a serious g force to absorb in that suit
Just like missile
Vivek Vijayan well human body is no missile
Well, i mean, it can be if you launch it fast enough lol
One thing you can't take away from me....... " I am Ironman".
Are there any materials that are strong enough to withstand the impact of missiles like in the iron man film? And also good video btw, u earned yourself a new subscriber
Evans Corcher Thank you. There is no single material that can withstand such impact loads unless they are coushioned. For example in space, there is space debris moving around that has a linear velocity of more than 25000 mph. The only way to withstand such debris to have cushion material in between sucessive layers of metal. The international space station moves out of the way of space debris. If you watch the initial scenes of the movie Gravity, you will notice the damaging effect of projectiles at high speed. There is no single material but a combination of materials that can stop it
Apologies for the typos. I am on the go and typing from my phone
Ok thank you very much for the helpful info
!!!! carbon nanotubes
Nanotubes .? Won't they ignite easily at high friction regions? Such as flying at super sonic speed. ?
Wireless energy. Imagine the power things we can create with wireless energy
That's cool and all but how do we go about that
I swear i wish i had money. No doubt with a cave full of industrial junk i could make something close
Retro Digi Just go to a junkyard or something or make money
And then there is the Hulkbuster which requires a minimum of seven Arc reactors to power.
Even stanlee doesnt knows this
can you do black panther suit?
I have done one on Black Panther but its more based on Vibranium properties. Please look at my second last uploaded video
While the general public may not have access to technology such as this, I believe there are some black budget programs capable of making something close to it. We more or less do have the technological capability of creating such things, but they won't let us have any access to it because it would take energy sources that would put the fossil fuel companies out of business. We could and should have efficient electric cars by now, but money is what really rules this world and the fossil fuel industry has more power than god in that respect. You can thank them for pretty much all the problems in the modern era. Even if someone did invent an arc reactor they would stop at nothing to supress it's existence and very likely already have countless times.
Death By Design Graphics
DARPA is probably working on something.
True
Boron as a FUEL. The next big thing. As a fuel source. Redundant SMA's. Lithium Hydroxide in pockets in a layer between two skins. Use the water created in the carbon dioxide removal to mix with the H2 producing compound. You now have boron AND hydrogen as a fuel source along with lithium ion batteries. Titanium alloy shell with carbon fiber bracing. Wicking cloth to move water and sweat away from the pilot/driver. Also , though I can't go into details , there is L A R G E push into something called M.E.H.A.S which gives incredible strength in a quite small package. LOL however 18 relief valves of various brands and pressures have exploded quite violently except one. Just info
nuclear arc reactor may be
The real question about flying is HOW ON EARTH are we gonna get such powerful technology to be so SMALL and convenient? You can't have an Iron Man suit where each component for flight is the size of your head or larger.
Jason Skywalker I think it can be done. I thought hover-boards would never exist. After that came about I couldn’t think of anything we can’t do beside time travel and light speed travel anytime soon
before going into all the fancy stuff, u should have checked if the actual exoskeleton could be made. meaning if u can actually make something so "tight" on the human body that can give u the mechanical advantages of the suit. u only briefly went trough the inner and outer shell, what about the actual skeleton that gives u the power to lift cars and obviously run faster and longer. the mechanics need to be met before u go into the tech and sofware
Exo-skeletons like Gym suits have already been made for deep sea exploration. You are right though. The GYM suit is not very ergonomic. There has been a project done by the US military on exo skeleton. Its called the TALOS project. Not much details of that are available as it was confidential. Exo skeletons however have been made in real life that allow people to lift heavy objects
@@synergyfiles3536How heavy can they lift ?? Can they lift a car ??
This video ate its words after Zapata Racing released footage of the Flyboard.
Barely anybody is considering a layer of graphene to help with armour. Probably because it’s still technically experimental, but scientists say it could stop bullets
Edit: whilst being thin and lightweight
Mr Boombastic it would take 23 layers of 1nm thick graphene to stop a 9mm round
Mr Boombastic also in order to improve energy sustainability you would need CNT (carbon nano tube) muscle packs to have a sufficient power to weight ratio plus the cnt would enable the suit to have the power of a jackhammer in every limb
Interesting.
He would need vibranium for one the layers to absorb the shock
+Ernest Motley Thats a good solution
A real life analogue to vibranium would be some carbon fibre polymer, not a metal though
@@kerbodynamicx472No its not ur best beßt would be sorbothane or d3o
Placing thrusters in hand would be practically impossible due to the heat generation
Super Video !
There are other too like it
i think I mabe that reacter which give power to this sute i need just others parts of this suit
It is stated in the first movie that the armour on the suits is a Titanium and gold alloy
After watching this I think I ll brag among my friends that how iron man suit is made :)
nizamshah bukhari
Nah ..don't do it
You know the way you can layer the suit. Put a gold titanium alloy for armor. Under that, graphene to make it completely bullet resistent. And then under that put sorbothane for safety.
I studying Electrical Engineering :) I can be do it , I believe it
Damon Salvatore Thats the spirit
+Synergy Files thanks :)
I have the arc reactor designs
i guess we can form a community who are ambitious as we are ....
Ganta think about arc reactor
The suite could use hydrogen cells
Or If fusion is possible It could be a nuclear reactor
Polonium micro fusion reactor of some sort originally (later changed to some fictional element that wasn't as DANGEROUS). A Shrunk down version of the test reactor Iron Monger has an argument with a fella about seems to be what it is - I am amused by the idea of trying to miniaturise a fusion reactor though - that has a a feeling of improbability about it due to not being large enough to protect those around it from stray high energy particle decay. Unless the magnetic field is somehow able to contain them inside and only allow harmless omissions like Neutrinos of something like that. But it's fiction so it's all in fun - But it does make me wonder what the limit of how small you could potentially make a fusion reactor would be (when such things exist) - they might be useful for powering aircraft so large they don't need to land, or city sized ships or Space Craft I guess.
@@90lancaster it was palladium, then it later changed in IM2 when tony 'created' a new element, which is vibranium.
I think one day nuclear energy will be use..well technology always improve right? So it is possible nuclear can be used
The shit in the movie is powered by confidence, which will never dry up here.
I mean the whole point of Tony Stark is that his mind is capable of making technology far better than what we have today. So right there this video is kinda pointless 😂😂