Poker Adjustments Masterclass: How to Beat Everyone

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 136

  • @PhilGalfond
    @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +4

    If you enjoyed this and want to improve your mindset at the tables, you’d like my free ebook, Poker Mindset Strategy. Get your copy here: www.philgalfond.com/mindset-yt

  • @cooperrobertson7210
    @cooperrobertson7210 Рік тому +102

    I'm going to need to rewatch this 100x. Thanks Phil

    • @kohlfixari
      @kohlfixari Рік тому +5

      I feel the same… AMAZING

    • @SuhendraLie
      @SuhendraLie Рік тому +5

      Same

    • @3dg3Z
      @3dg3Z Рік тому +3

      I'm on my third watch, 4th one will be taking notes and so on XD

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +19

      You’re so welcome! Enjoy it (100 times) 😃

    • @SFreedberg1
      @SFreedberg1 Рік тому +2

      Have you re-watched it? Great info especially for 2-5 live games. I was listening while taking notes and that seems to work. The act of writing down seems at least for me to help me retain the information. Then I realized there is a transcript and you can read along with him. Best of luck.

  • @Alexandertygreat
    @Alexandertygreat Рік тому +17

    This is by far the best poker knowledge ever given away for free. The idea exploiting ranges street by street based on opponent leaks is genius. I dont use that word ever. Brilliant stuff Phil.

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +3

      Thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed.

  • @jluchette
    @jluchette Рік тому +16

    This channel is absolutely phenomenal. With the endless Poker content on YT, the only channels I never miss an upload are Doug Polk (I’m an OG, still remember when his channel was brand new) and Finding Equilibrium.
    This channel does what soooo many others attempt to do in an over-saturated genre, which is provide something truly unique.
    I have a feeling we’re going to be saying “I remember when this channel had less than 50k subs.” This is just… it. Phil, you’re doing this YT thing right. I wish you all the succces you’ve got coming, and I’ll be here for it.

  • @adamwalzrealestate
    @adamwalzrealestate 15 днів тому

    Phil is an underrated player who puts out underrated content. This is awesome.

  • @RedCandles_
    @RedCandles_ 2 місяці тому

    I love listening to/learning poker theory bc it translates so well to day trading. Thinking in probabilities, progressive betting, being selective ab your spots and knowing when to push, all things I’ve picked up from poker.

    • @hn-ca24
      @hn-ca24 Місяць тому

      Lmao day trading.

  • @yothisiselmo
    @yothisiselmo 8 місяців тому +1

    crazy you can watch stuff like this for free, preciate it man

  • @duster66
    @duster66 7 місяців тому +1

    Perfect tone + info to fall asleep too.
    I have found it a great foil to my insomnia.
    Thanks
    Phil

  • @marcoslugo2384
    @marcoslugo2384 Рік тому +1

    All this Poker Knowledge from many Professionals, who are willing to share, is a gift. It depends how we use this & keep going to learn more and more. I'm 100% thankful for videos like this.

  • @JM-vk2ru
    @JM-vk2ru Рік тому +9

    unbelievably good content. ty phil

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +1

      You’re very welcome and thank you! Glad you enjoyed it!

  • @francescoiadicicco1266
    @francescoiadicicco1266 Рік тому +1

    This channel is a hidden gold nugget. I'm out for work, but I'll make sure to check it out tonight. Thank you Mr. Galfond.

  • @Changed_my_name_to_Bob
    @Changed_my_name_to_Bob 10 місяців тому

    Great video Phil. I think this is the best explanation of these kinds of concepts I have seen yet. Awesome points and I appreciate you spreading the knowledge even though it will make for tougher games! Keep it up man.

  • @yakovnew1615
    @yakovnew1615 Рік тому +1

    Phil Galfond is my new favorite poker player.

  • @mortenbonde5411
    @mortenbonde5411 7 місяців тому

    Super grateful that I found these videos. Super insightful, really clearly explained and well delivered.

  • @tominasia
    @tominasia 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for the tips, great thoughts behind with good explanation - keep it up :)

  • @stevegoldy2196
    @stevegoldy2196 Рік тому +11

    Hey Phil i recently read a tweet where you responded to someone who said they would often go Deep in MTTs but never FT. The advice you gave really resonated with me and after several deep runs in COOP events i made my first ever SCOOP FT recently finishing 2nd in the $5.50 2-7 SD $7.5k GTD. I stayed aggressive, i embraced the variance and i could not of had that result without your advice so thank you!

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +4

      Amazing! Thank you for sharing that with me. I’m so glad it made a difference!!

    • @noskill25
      @noskill25 Рік тому

      what was the advice if I could ask?

    • @Tom_Bee_
      @Tom_Bee_ Рік тому

      ​@@noskill25stay aggressive and embrace the variance, is what I'm getting from OP's comment? A lot of players go passive at and after the bubble...

  • @victorcurysimionato6412
    @victorcurysimionato6412 Рік тому +4

    I never get tired of saying it, you are the man !!

  • @kingdurkalerpa1044
    @kingdurkalerpa1044 Рік тому

    This video is pure gold. I never seen another video where players talk about how to play against each player type.

  • @CRAIG5835
    @CRAIG5835 Рік тому +3

    As usual, thanks, man. Extremely informative for those who are wishing to take their game to the best of their ability, but also great for a relative newbie to the game, all the plays as explained by Phil Galfond, data that would normally cost to learn, and explained by the dulcet tones of future Hall of Fame, HUPLO and NLHE professor, the inimitable Phil Galfond. Did you like the professor touch Phil? This vid is 'as sweet as.'

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +4

      Much appreciated, Craig! I think I do like the professor touch 🙂

  • @amypowell6495
    @amypowell6495 Рік тому

    This is the only video I've ever watched at .75 speed lol. There's a lot to absorb! Thanks Phil.

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +2

      As someone who finds most of my videos too boring at 1x, I very much appreciate this!!

  • @MDKdogma
    @MDKdogma Рік тому +1

    A long form bit of content?! What a gift! I haven't even watched it yet (I guess I'll comment after too...) but I'm jazzed.

  • @zille3000
    @zille3000 Рік тому

    I just found your channel yesterday. Keep up the good quality. I really like your calm way of talking.

  • @booweekly34
    @booweekly34 Рік тому

    You better favorite poker player mind since the interview where you explain how having a friend that you bounced back ideas and strategies with is how to get better at poker. I thank you so much for your knowledge

  • @user-or5hi4li3z
    @user-or5hi4li3z 3 місяці тому

    Watched the first twelve minutes. Went to local casino and won the tournament (3rd tourney ive played). Now i will finish the video.

  • @danthomson3611
    @danthomson3611 Рік тому +1

    Would love to see you do a similar version of this video for PLO!

  • @alexzemer5868
    @alexzemer5868 Рік тому +1

    Hi Phil! Would you be so kind as to record a video on how rake affects our opening range in preflop and continuation range in postflop! What is the "force" that causes players to narrow their ranges in a high rake environment!!!???

  • @ibanez510
    @ibanez510 Рік тому

    Wait why do you never slowplay against 'Maniac 3?' (23:20) What am I missing? If they're bluffing every street, don't you always slow play?

  • @dschungelheissmann
    @dschungelheissmann Рік тому +1

    Amazing video! This has so much value plus the format and clarity of the explanation is also top. I have to rewatch and think about that.
    For the wish list: could you say something about adjusting to bet Sizing "mistakes "? Now with gto solutions out there, recommended preflop size is 2x-2.5x . Why? When should we ignore that and raise larger? How would you exploit players who usually raise 4x? Also postflop: solvers recommend small range bets in some static flops and small infrequent bets for monotone flops.(Etc,etc,...). How can we exploit bet size deviations? Thanks!

  • @nahumvilla2692
    @nahumvilla2692 Рік тому +2

    amazing and great value content!

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому

      Thank you so much! Glad you enjoyed!!

  • @ltisenotem
    @ltisenotem Рік тому

    My head while watching this: 🤯🤯🤯
    Gonna need to rewatch with a pen and paper. Thanks for the content Phil!!!

  • @louismaberry9683
    @louismaberry9683 Рік тому +1

    Awesome, as always Phil!

  • @bigmaz3783
    @bigmaz3783 Рік тому

    great content Phil keep it up bro !

  • @Josh-ed3sf
    @Josh-ed3sf 11 місяців тому

    so many people are rightly talking about how helpful this is for adjusting to your opponents. but I'll go one step farther.
    this is so helpful for FINDING YOUR leaks too .. maybe even more so.
    for me, they were:.
    bluffing the turn to bluff the river against someone who underfolds middle and bottom pair on the turn but way over folds to these bets on the river
    overbluffing against tight passive opponents on the turn on dry boards , since their check calling range is much stronger than the average player they actually have less weaker hands in their range .
    Essentially, I would hone in on a character trait without thinking about what that trait is actually doing to the hands they are showing up with in relation to the hands of other players.
    The "if I apply enough pressure they will eventually fold" trap.

  • @cpasa798
    @cpasa798 Рік тому +1

    How do you adjust to tables that call to much your early position raise without 3-betting. You keep playing multiway pots out of position with a strong range. AK is specially difficult to play here because it miss 2/3 of the time and it’s hard to bluff multiple opponents OOP. If you hit you are only getting action when you are behind

    • @spacecadetsMia
      @spacecadetsMia Рік тому

      Maybe 3bet larger if they call and it's multiway and you miss the flop just fold.

    • @johnmorgan233
      @johnmorgan233 Рік тому

      Pocket 9s and 10s have Similar playabity issues

    • @cpasa798
      @cpasa798 Рік тому

      @@johnmorgan233 yes, but they have better implied odd properties. AK has none

    • @hemispherecompensation
      @hemispherecompensation Рік тому

      ​@@spacecadetsMia he means when you RFI

    • @andrewb4943
      @andrewb4943 Рік тому

      It’s pretty simple .. don’t cbet if you miss multi-way with ak.

  • @LucasTishler
    @LucasTishler Рік тому +2

    *Such good content for free, legend*

  • @dennisje2925
    @dennisje2925 Рік тому

    Thanks for the video. I am aTAG with a lot of maniac 3 moves.

  • @janruzek5281
    @janruzek5281 Рік тому

    Hi Great VID! What about players who fold more than 50% vs potbet on the turn and when they call they fold again more than 50% vs pot on the river. Then its +EV to play 2brrl right? thank you

    • @Hellothere1232
      @Hellothere1232 27 днів тому

      sounds like you found a crazy exploit to abuse unless they adjust. Good luck man

  • @SolaceAndBane
    @SolaceAndBane Рік тому

    Watching these videos has been like printing money for me. Thanks Phil!

  • @ronaldmizrahi
    @ronaldmizrahi Рік тому

    Great information Phil! 😀👍💰

  • @joanlamson5932
    @joanlamson5932 Рік тому

    Huge fan of yours! I've had 8 years of college and law school, but I find in my 60's that I don't have the attention span to listen to the full analysis without contemporaneous video graphics, especially since we can't play for real money in the USA and especially since I quit PLO because it was addictive. So here's what my weakened attention span concluded: I found myself thinking Thank God he "adjusted" (the theme word, clearly) the Taliban beard to a goatee.

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +1

      I’ve begun to always look forward to your video and beard reviews, JoAn. Thank you!

  • @Aqwkz
    @Aqwkz Рік тому +2

    Have the notebook ready! Thanks in advance Phill !

  • @zalujevi
    @zalujevi Рік тому

    Its so good what u have done Phil,and i am 44 and i know i Will watch this God knows how many times
    Great work,love to watch it and as always #regardsfromcroatia

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому

      Thank you so much! I loved hearing that you found it so helpful! ♥️

  • @Beyond-Poker369
    @Beyond-Poker369 11 місяців тому

    great video, thank u phil, love u

  • @spacecadetsMia
    @spacecadetsMia Рік тому +1

    Can you make a video on how to beat loose splashy live low stakes cash games please?!?!

  • @Rags2RichesPoker
    @Rags2RichesPoker 11 місяців тому

    Phil should have way more subscribers.

  • @Around_the_Corn
    @Around_the_Corn Рік тому

    Can you do a video on the 5 times/reasons you might pass on a C-bet on the flop?

  • @borg972
    @borg972 Рік тому +2

    Really appreciate a long and detailed video! Shorts is a bad and shallow format imho, glad you're doing this as well!

    • @PhilGalfond
      @PhilGalfond  Рік тому +2

      Glad you enjoyed!

    • @jluchette
      @jluchette Рік тому

      In general, don’t generalize. “Shorts are shallow” is such a broad statement. SO broad it exposes your narrow view.
      That said: the more the better from Phil. There are absolute jewels in all of his videos, regardless of the length.

  • @alexw8450
    @alexw8450 Рік тому

    Thank you for all of that content. you are such an amazing player instructor and human.
    Just one question to this genius video. Everything relates to HU Cash right?
    Could you also make a video about perception? I think this it is a very important topic and almost nobody talks about how you are perceived at a at table and if you play or call a hand wrong / bad just with the intention to change the perception the table / player has of you.
    For my perception is is a big bias that when player spot an "obvious" mistake or maniac play. you got that badge pinned on your forehead because of this one hand.
    Which in and off itself can be a big trap for future game.
    But again maybe this is not vaild for headsup / hightstakes as you play to many hands with each other anyway.
    Live long and prosper Sir Galfond

  • @treyglass4883
    @treyglass4883 4 місяці тому +1

    Is that a water bottle refilling thing in your house??

  • @jaybingham3711
    @jaybingham3711 Рік тому

    When the assessment (lag, tag, etc) is mostly true/valid, these are fine points worthy of implementing. The biggest problem, however, is the assessment. You probably need a separate video covering all the intricacies involved with that. Card flow and table make-up can conspire to bring about conditions that signal a player to be a certain type when in fact they aren't that at all. It's so incredible how quickly people will jump to a firm conclusion that a player IS a type pursuant only to a few hands rather than taking the time to record enough observations before drawing a conclusion. Worse, these people don't even track their data (misassessments). They are happy to gamble on the fact that their instinct...their gut...is right. Of course, tracking such data is a hassle. And what if that data proves you're horrible with your reads? Can't have that.

  • @arikotzen5304
    @arikotzen5304 Рік тому

    Such amazing content!

  • @belthazar666
    @belthazar666 Рік тому +1

    This is why they call him "long video phil"

  • @conilmionomecripto
    @conilmionomecripto Рік тому

    K8T4T donkoverbet on the river with every bluffcatcher and Tx+ and all became an oppo problem, not mine :)

  • @chrisblockley6166
    @chrisblockley6166 Рік тому

    I had a full house kings and queens today and lost the hand to a royal flush £135 pot 😢

  • @DaveFu
    @DaveFu Рік тому

    I like your books. I bet you keep more Sklansky bucks in them than I do. :)

  • @ricardovelasco691
    @ricardovelasco691 Рік тому

    Hello Phil, this might perhaps be tricky to answer but what adjustments you suggest us non GTO players do in game when facing perceived GTO Experts with minimal exploitations (if any) in their game? The way I see it is that it will take a lot of time an effort to eliminate or greatly reduce our own leaks but until we do, we will continue to face such opponents when playing so any advice helps 😎

    • @coreyhuggins5785
      @coreyhuggins5785 Рік тому

      pay attention to them, even theoretically based players are highly exploitable in low stakes. I’d recommend learning about how to figure out value/bluff ratios (gtowizard has a great video or two) and learning what spots your opponents are missing the marks. You can then come back to this video and figure out what adjustment makes sense (ex. boards where there are a lot of overcards and draws tend to be often overbluffed even by non maniacs)

  • @PoliteAF
    @PoliteAF Рік тому +1

    I can hardly believe this video is free.

  • @Dynamice1337
    @Dynamice1337 Рік тому

    I'm usually looking for games with players who call down too loose. I make most of my profit by mercilessly value betting moderate strength hands for 3 streets.

  • @Dawid121970
    @Dawid121970 Рік тому

    So good stuff

  • @1mordi104
    @1mordi104 Рік тому

    what a legend bro

  • @VurtAddicted
    @VurtAddicted Рік тому

    My question here is: how much history do you need to spot those traits?

    • @jluchette
      @jluchette Рік тому

      It varies at low stakes ( usually play .50/1 - 1/2 so I’m not the one to ask about nosebleeds or even reasonably high stakes) but I’ll weigh in: where I’m at, it’s easy to spot extreme tendencies (if someone sits down and starts bombing flops immediately after about 20 hands of that you can safely assume they’re an over-bluffing maniac, in an extreme example.
      At higher stakes where people generally don’t make mistakes that are so obvious the average noob can spot them, I’m sure it can take multiple sessions/reviews of hand histories to get clued in on their tendencies.
      In short: I don’t think it’s a reach to say people make more mistakes and more obvious mistakes the lower the stakes; the higher you get leaks in players’ games are less frequent and less extreme. So we can say “it varies” confidently.

  • @pm13bs
    @pm13bs Рік тому

    Amazing, thank you.

  • @nl-sd6zl
    @nl-sd6zl Рік тому

    FIRST - 1 hour phil vid lets GOOOOOOOOOO

  • @BrettMorton-z7g
    @BrettMorton-z7g 4 місяці тому

    AWESOME! TY SO MUCH!!!

  • @mightypensword
    @mightypensword 4 місяці тому +1

    Another exploit: If they check fold on the flop, their check fold range is probably very weak.

  • @shaunthornton7113
    @shaunthornton7113 6 днів тому

    When I play online, I'm useless. I couldn't win if my life depends on it, but when playing in pubs and casinos, I'm a better player. I do well it's frustrating

  • @gambler222
    @gambler222 Рік тому

    amazing video phil. what about hit and runners?

  • @lizdoesit
    @lizdoesit Рік тому

    Phil I would love to see a video about adjustments / differences in play, strategy, win rate etc when playing limit.

  • @TomRauhe
    @TomRauhe Рік тому +1

    It would help if the maniacs would turn out to not have the nuts 90% against me 😂🍀

  • @FriendsForFriends666
    @FriendsForFriends666 Рік тому

    Omg 1 hour video, you're spoiling Mr hey guys😂 what's next 2 hour video?? 👀

  • @jbpokerwar8962
    @jbpokerwar8962 Рік тому +1

    Phil I like to make money....shhh lol. No great content man, keep it coming!

  • @DabuDave
    @DabuDave Рік тому

    i. taking notes to review fir later thanks new sub

  • @cpasa798
    @cpasa798 Рік тому

    Hey Phil, could you make a video of where the EV come from for each type of hand? Value betting on small SPR, flopping the nuts against an overpair, bluff catching, bluffing 1 street, bluffing 3 streets, etc? So we can adjust our range to other players frequencies

  • @mazdaah
    @mazdaah Рік тому

    (around 7min time) I assume you misspoke, and meant if you win over 33% of the time. If you win a pot over 50% of the time, any money you put in it is +EV.

    • @Isaac-pg2hm
      @Isaac-pg2hm Рік тому

      That's not true. You have to look at pot odds.

  • @razvanMH22
    @razvanMH22 9 місяців тому

    thank you for the v1deo bro

  • @FrankMitchell-lh1pl
    @FrankMitchell-lh1pl Рік тому

    Opponent check raises to often on flops
    me- oh we’re doing battle…4 bet his ass wider
    Phil- do xyz on turn & river
    My brain- 🤯

  • @loco4dogg
    @loco4dogg Рік тому

    So I don't have to make the max every time I've got the nuts, sometimes it might be smaller than a full double up and that's ok. Hmmm
    Thanks for all the insights, I've really got to find another player to bounce thoughts/ideas off.

  • @enny43_
    @enny43_ Рік тому

    I haven't watched yet but I hope each player type is given an analogy to an animal

  • @adriantolwinski6356
    @adriantolwinski6356 Рік тому

    Thanks, good content. Your breathing is very uneasy though - relax my guy!

  • @brettblaster
    @brettblaster Рік тому

    Goat 🐐

  • @academicdeaneducation6671
    @academicdeaneducation6671 Рік тому +1

    These all presume you are heads up. Adding a third player creates a serious increase in complexity.

  • @PsyferInc
    @PsyferInc Рік тому

    So if I think my opponent is bluffing all-in, it's ok to call with Jack four? Asking for a friend...

    • @myaccount3402
      @myaccount3402 Рік тому

      If you straddle for 1200 and it folds around to a notorious stealer, J high has a bit of value...my wife thought she played it perfectly

  • @wiktor_333
    @wiktor_333 Рік тому +1

    brazil maniacs should get banned