Volvo XC90 T8 acceleration 0-200
Вставка
- Опубліковано 5 лют 2025
- From 0 to 200 km/h with the new Volvo XC90 T8 Twin Engine.
And welcome to our Autoblogger channel. For suggestions, ideas or business inquiries, please send an email to tips@autoblog.nl. You can also send us your own video's!
We bring you the best reviews of the most interesting cars. Since september '10 we also had our own carshow on Dutch television. Subscribe to us for the latest models and reviews!
Check our Playlists:
Most populair: bit.ly/1csqLmg
Babes & Cars: bit.ly/1cUsK5I
Aston Martin: bit.ly/1cUrGi0
Porsche: bit.ly/16Mj7SM
Jaguar: bit.ly/1gjTpuR
Audi: bit.ly/1bVZw6G
BMW M-power: bit.ly/1cUsK5I
Mercedes: bit.ly/1bW17tb
Volkswagen: bit.ly/1gjSPgF
Volvo: bit.ly/GXUhpc
More on: www.autoblog.nl, www.abhd.nl and www.autojunk.nl
The powerful symbiosis of an electric motor and a (four-cylinder!) petrol engine. Job well done, Volvo!
That is just brutal! Such a big car accelerating like that, at least the 0-100 part wasn't bad at all! Kudos!
Dream car!
tofsen12345 I love the t8 but I have a huge heart for the old models too
Ha val
Nice video! If its TCS off with hybrid mode it can be few seconds faster
Que bonito por la C32 en una autopista de 120 km/h
make a video of the audi q7 hybride vs volvo t8 hybride
Would be nice
Frank Reinbergen Indeed. Would be nice. The Q7's output will be 374 hp (the XC90's 400 hp) from a hybrid diesel engine (the XC90 has a hybrid petrol engine). The Q7 will be able to drive fully electrically for at most 58 kilometres. The XC90's fully electrical range is about 40 kilometres.
StigSpielberg I love cars and my dad needs a new one. he likes big and comfortable. i like fast ad sporty. so i hope these cars will be in the next video. to find out wich is the best. i am defenetly gonna drive them both at the garage
in march is the preview of the q7 for me, already waiting...
Frank Reinbergen It's still unclear what the Q7 Hybrid's price will be. But judging from its low carbon dioxide emission (50 grams per km), it may be an interesting competitor to the XC90 under environmentally driven taxation systems (such as the one in Holland). But then it comes to one's personal opinion about its design and its driving characteristics compared to the XC90's. Have fun comparing the both of them! By the way, has your dad also considered a Lexus RX 450h, a Porsche Cayenne Hybrid or a BMW X5 Hybrid? The latter is expected to hit stores this year.
It would be nice, but the Q7 Hybrid will have a diesel engine and the T8 has a petrol engine. So ofcourse the Q7 will be more economical in the test. But as Volvo said, a diesel version of the plug-in hybrid will arrive later on, probably called the D8. They had to make choices and preferred to start with the T8 first because petrol was more available then diesel throughout the world, they said. Hopefully until then they will have improved the full electric range even more.
I've got the Polestar version and it timed at 4.98 0-120kph.
Seems more than quick enough but man.. That tach would drive me fucking nuts. To slow to keep up, seems laggy in its movements.
Could have to do with the camera not being able to pick up the screen's frequency. I've noticed it before when watching videos on youtube but when driving the car IRL it's perfectly smooth.
Krille3 exactly
Krille3 Aah.. Haven't noticed something like this in a video, and then had a go in the car afterwards. Sounds completely reasonable though.
I noticed the exact same thing when watching other new XC90 videos. I hope they will fix this before it reaches the public. I don't understand why it is so laggy and choppy. In current Volvos the digital display is very smooth, so I really don't know why they can't do the same with the new XC90
myvolvoforlife
Volvo would never launch this car with a laggy display :p either its the cameras fault or it's because the T8 models journalists drove at the press launch were sort of pre-production models. So don't worry ;)
Fast car
Volvo only makes 4 cylinder engines now. Even on oil tanker size SUVs like this one. It's for people that don't care what's under the hood.
Or it's just the opposite. People who cares often run more environmentally friendly and / or fuel efficient rather than a large, inefficient engine that sounds nice.
Johan Littorin
Small engines won't save the planet. And they're not really more efficient, not significantly at least. Downsizing is a result of current laws. Eco friendly downsizing is just car company advertisment to keep seelling cars.
Bfnflavius So by that rationale: Drinking responsibly is totally the same as being an alcoholic? Smoking 4 cigarettes a day won't be less damaging to your health than smoking a whole package? Check got it. You're living in some false dichotomy world of polar opposites and absolute truths.
"Small engines won't save the planet." Eating less fat food won't save you.
"And they're not really more efficient, not significantly at least. " *False* they're way cleaner than engines from 10-20 years ago. Check out a few emission tests on old cars.
"Downsizing is a result of current laws." No such laws exist. The *market* is the real drive. If there were such laws (in Italy there is) then that's a *good incentive* .
"Eco friendly downsizing is just car company advertisment to keep seelling cars." Part true. You see in most developed countries fuel prices are high and will be getting higher. So people don't want to pay a fortune in running costs every year. On top of that environmental taxes are in place in many developed nations. As such the market exists for what consumers desire. It is however *completely false* it're just company advertisement. That's one of the lousiest rationalizations I've heard.
Maybe "small engines" won't save the planet. But they will seriously limit the emissions until we come up with effective, new green energy. They are an *improvement* and that's an objective fact based on modern day emission laws and consumer running costs.
When *Porsche* designs hybrids and even recently crushed the all-time lap time record on the Nurburgring with their hybrid 919 (powered by a 2,0 liter V4) you'd better believe companies with an eye for the future and a desire to stay ahead of the competition (Porsche designs cars to win) you'd better believe there's more to it than just your "company advertisement" involved.
Listen: Our company car is a 1,0 liter turbo. Even though I drive it like it's a race I have never seen a higher fuel consumption than 7,3 liters per 100 kilometers in city traffic. And I push it to the metal all the time. If I did the same to a car 10 years ago I'd see more than *twice* that fuel being burned.
Smoking less won't save you... Sigh. Polarized extremes. The hallmark of...
Caught on camera! You will get a fine.
Begrensd op 200?
Acceleration was pretty quick until 139km/h
What is that "Ka-Thunk" at 0:07 seconds (@40kph) is that a bump or the transmission switch-over?
+Shawn Stewart agressive change i guess, looking at the tacho
+Shawn Stewart Loss of grip.
Kan niet wachten op de xc90 t8 van m'n ouders!
27 seconde van 0-200
On a public road, not clever. You should've switched away from gps view at least...