this is what it will take as a type of building in Turkey after this disaster, after the tests, this structure perfectly resists the earthquake equivalent to 7.5 on the Richter scale, it would have saved many lives in the seismic zone .
Yes. Turkey is full of buildings that dont meet the safety criteria and are built on soft structures. The earthquakes also took place in cities with lots of poverty which is a reason why so many buildings collapsed
And of course, corruption is the biggest factor. Anyhow those buildings were approved in terms of earthquake regulations. Most of the people from the East of Turkey have bought graveyard for themselves.
But in any building people make internal changes which change properties of building so...even if this is build some joe will drill though a wall to make open space dinning room
@@stxrmyrl509 On the contrary, people were left alive because there were single-storey buildings in poor areas. a site that was advertised as the strongest buildings in the city completely collapsed. Unfortunately, the state does not impose a standard on the contractors in this regard, they steal materials as it suits them, if it continues like this, a much more terrible Istanbul earthquake awaits us..
An earthquake is certainly a unique experience. We had one a couple years ago in Idaho and it was my very first experience with one. The sensation it gives your body is very unique to only an earthquake. It's nothing like a rollercoaster at all. When the ground shakes beneath you and everything is moving, your body and equilibrium become very disoriented and you can't help but feel like you're drunk or high. In my opinion, it's one of the worst natural experiences a human body can endure, even if you're an adrenaline junkie
I've always found the experience a little unsettling, but interesting and curious. But I've only experience 3-4 scale earthquakes, which are extremely minor, and leave me wishing I'd paid more attention while they were happening (they catch you off guard, of course). I can imagine anything over a 5 or 6 would be quite a horrible feeling.
i've experienced turkey earthquake forget about shaking that adrenaline bump goes off but what doesn't go off is when u see collapsed buildings with people in it everywhere you go collapsed if u live in country like turkey everywhere is thief contractor imagine buying a house with 3 million turkish liras and it collapses in seconds and u are with your family in it even 1 week after that earthquake streets smell like corpses you can imagine the rest of it
Meanwhile, us experiencing earthquakes 2-3 times every 3 weeks. It isn't really much of a surprise. We've become used to it already that we can identify the intensity (not specifically of course, just the general scale) of the earthquake through feeling itself just by how strong the ground shakes and the lateral movements of the buildings. Perks of living within the Pacific Rim of Fire. Scale 5-6 are strong but not that much destructive than 7 and above
This is the world's largest 3D shaker table. It is located at the E-Defense facility, part of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention in Miki City, Japan.
@@ChiliCheeseD0g It is about resonance frequency. Any material has it. Unfortunately earthquake generated frequency often match building frequency. Any material cracks when the wave matches its frequency.
@@namitajimmy6737 Yeah, like a tree, it has to bend or it’d tip on MY HOUSE- I have a huge tree in my front yard and in storms I am always scared that it’s gonna fall on my house!
Could easily withstand it. 1,5 minutes is nothing compared to magnitude 8.5-9.0 quakes that lasts 5-8 minutes in Chile, Alaska and Japan. BUILD BETTER BUILDINGS!
@@sergiobastos4274 Wow i never thought someone with enough brain to text would make a correlation between the earthquake and nato. Thanks for surprising me.
@@sergiobastos4274 Oh a peterson fan, his fanbase is very consistent with the amount of intellectual power they put on their comments which is near zero.
@1:09 there’s a crack of splintering wood. Also unless there are added weights somewhere, this isn’t realistic because there’d be many additional tons of cladding, roof, windows, doors, interior drywall, plumbing, flooring, appliances, fixtures, furniture, full hot water heaters, and people and all their stuff. The shear loads would be much higher than tested.
On top of budget and all that I think having any machine carry and shake the tons and tons of steel and concrete is probably impossible to build today.
I survived the big one in 1989; 6.9 loma prieta. Houses which were well build all survived. Wooden houses really are the best; unless you go with reinforced concrete or steel.
i like those people . they always come up with the best solutions. here's a good example of them taking this more seriously than anyone else in the world.
@@jamesfranko1568 ya only a few 150+ year old roofs collapsed, and a few fancy ceilings/lights in expensive restaurants and such. there's a video of skyscrapers swaying in tokyo that i found astonishing. the only harm i'm aware of was mainly from hoarders who had their stuff fall onto them.
@@ayaanyani5521 japan earthquakes come from 500 km from down icra ..turkey earthquake happend 18 km to surface..so it is many times bigger then japan earthquakes because it is in surface.. although japan seen 9 magneitute..7.9 and 7.5 turkey earthquake much more deadly..japan will have smililar results if same happend in surface although they claim best in building engineering at leart in turkey people dont live in caves too..New buildings collapesed too
@@sforza1903 you are partially correct. The earthquake in Turkey was closer to the surface. However, saying that Japan would have similar results is objectively wrong. The problem in Turkey is the poor build quality/corrupt inspections, which does not exist in Japan to the same level.
In the case of gas, it is dangerous, so the system we have now is to shut off the gas supply as soon as a strong tremor is detected. This system is located throughout each house and in the middle of pipes, minimizing the impact if a pipe breaks.
the problem in Turkey is the ground . I also saw people remove columns because of their store just because to have more space in the 1st floor which is such a huge mistake . I have family in Izmir , and most of the buildings are up in the hills which requires really really good solid and stable structure . But as we saw last year same thing happened. If it is a flat ground alright but up in the hills the structure must be planned more seriously . It sad that those architectures tried to get away from the country when everything happened . For them the important thing is only the money
this is a retrofit, a quick solution for already built wooden houses, Turkey should try something which is basically copying the Chilean code of building
@@olekatoska1901 The new building code in Turkey (uptaded in 2018) is way more disiplined than Japan. But the problem is in bad execution, lack of control and corruption on old houses. I really envy Mexico and Chile. The absolute solution is to build two story houses like in US and Europe.
@@denissadak2521 We have already forgotten old earthquakes that happened back in history and built concrate houses on plains and alluvium grounds. Most collapses happened on that kind of terrains. All we need is to follow new building codes carefully and control it on progress.
The problem is, even if these small structures are built to withstand and 7.5 earthquake, does not mean they are safe. So many smaller buildings were crushed by larger buldings collapsing on top of them. We have a long way to go to make cities safer.
Wood structures age? As long as the wood is kept dry it lasts for lifetimes. The main reason some areas around the world use wood vs concrete is just based on availability of resources.
тряханули неплохо, но дом стоит на жёстком ровном основании, а вот если бы ещё к этому неравномерно просаживался и вспучивался фундамент, как происходит в реальность, я бы посмотрел что бы вышло...
from what we have seen from 4 major earthquakes and their footage from turkey in past 5 years. earthquakes dont just shake you left and right in almost every instance the surface of earth is litteraly bouncing up and down flexing and bending looking like a litteraly jelly cake cooled in fridge. some buildings no way in hell can survive that.
They made extra sure to build that right, whereas in most cases contractors get lazy and forget shit or cut corners. Not all the time but I've seen it.
A 10.0 is the equivalent of 2 times the entire world's Nuclear Arsenal, or 1 million Hiroshima Nuclear Bombs. It would be nearly 6 times more powerful than the 1960 Valdivia earthquake (Most powerful earthquake on record) and was felt/detected 6000 miles away from the epicenter. It would be 22 times more powerful than the 2004 Boxing Day earthquake/tsunami that killed 280,000 people. It would be nearly 2,000 times more powerful than the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake that killed 3,000 people and destroyed 80% of San Francisco. And 89,000 times more powerful than the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) Earthquake that caused an estimated 100 billion in damage
I think it is possible to build structures in a way where the 'design itself' can keep it from collapsing. Putting extra material into the construction to brace it more to me is just more added weight, and as you suggested - more cost. For instance why hasn't anyone thought of designing a frame that is flexible enough to have a backup system designed into it in the event (let's say) a joint beam comes apart from another joint beam? Why can't both of those loose ends fall into another part of the frame design to keep it from coming apart? Physics would have to be played with and included into such a test. How about adding cables in with the frames, cables to keep the structure from coming apart? Maybe some kind of puzzle design? Joints that can catch onto something else to keep it in the general place its supposed to be? In my view it is the frame that holds up the structure and so it should be the frame that should have designs within it that keeps it all from coming apart? This concept can be tested just by itself alone to see how it would work, make improvements on the design and then build the finish on it and see how the theory works out as a full unit? Everyone keeps building things with a cookie cutter concept. Think outside of the box and make it fun to design. These videos can offer a lot of information if people study them a lot more to understand the physics more.
As a Agean Turk, i experienced many Earthquakes in my life, after big earthquakes happen in my city, a lot of more earthquakes happen everyday for months, i experienced earthquake in toilet, while studying, while sleeping, in the school and school bus and more.
@@dontinsultmyprevioushandle unfortunately, there is nearly no more city where people can live as they used to. for both cases in hatay and maraş, all you can see is collapsed buildings around streets even if not, most of all are highly damaged. government possibly does not reveal the actual death rates or injuries. it is said that rates are "at least" 3-4 times higher which is around 150-200k, and that's horrendous. and still, government does not hesitate to hide the truth and cancel any sort of help for the sake of money. the governmental institute kızılay, the ONLY purpose of them was to save the people who are desperate. they sell donated blood, and tents which were prepared to be DONATED for the victims of any sort of disaster. they are way eviler than the devil itself. by the way, expectedly earthquakes are still happening, and many of them are greater than 4 mw.
' what kind of material build the model house... concrete / cement / metal / wood are big different strength of material... earthquake have few different ways of position shakes
Test by a single quake only !!! But most of the buildings collapes by a number of quakes during a massive earthquake including main shock and after shocks.
In my opinion the degree level should be raised and the time of the shock lengthened. We can never know how strong an earthquake will ever be and how long it may last.
This test is misleading on so many levels. It will take a lot of time to write down in a youtube comment the "little" things what would make a difference... for example : Not only a 20 seconds earthquake, the corrosion of the building through years, appliances like tiles ... so on so on.
i was designing this minimal earthquake tests when i was highscool kid in 2003, unfortunately i grew up in turkey, my shit friends, my dumb teachers were laughing at me, my mind was diving into these kind of dreams and my lecturers were thinking i am stupid and not interested with lessons, i had many troubles about stupid lectures, garbage turkish education system and many other things, now this systems and many other invensions are blinking at me from someone elses hands, when i die, giant ideas will be burried too. actually i am seeing that people are growing, many ideas has been found, i swear i was living with current many inventions 20 years before with only some drawings and calculations on paper. whatever but it hurts
6-storey wooden building. It may be earthquake resistant, but not against time. The walls may be wooden, but the load-bearing columns must be steel or concrete (or hybrid).
Not sure if the inertia of a filled in building is neglectible (it would behave a lot worse with stuff moving around inside). But they're a lot smarter than me so I assume every variable was taken into consideration.
You do make a good point though. This structure is indeed tons lighter. If all of the added materials were on it, in it then it might make a difference. Brick? Heavy furniture? People, it all adds up.
No building can resist without critical structual damage against magnitude 7.8 shallow earthquake lasting for 2mins and on top of that hit by 7.5 shortly after. As happened in south turkey / north syria recently
This was one of five tests modeled on the 1994 Northridge earthquake ground motions recorded at Canoga Park. That quake only lasted 10-20 seconds. According to wikipedia: "The death toll was 57, with more than 9,000 injured. In addition, property damage was estimated to be $13-50 billion (equivalent to $24-93 billion in 2021), making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history." seblog.strongtie.com/2019/07/designing-resilience-neeswood-capstone-a-decade-later/
this is what it will take as a type of building in Turkey after this disaster, after the tests, this structure perfectly resists the earthquake equivalent to 7.5 on the Richter scale, it would have saved many lives in the seismic zone .
Yes. Turkey is full of buildings that dont meet the safety criteria and are built on soft structures. The earthquakes also took place in cities with lots of poverty which is a reason why so many buildings collapsed
And of course, corruption is the biggest factor. Anyhow those buildings were approved in terms of earthquake regulations. Most of the people from the East of Turkey have bought graveyard for themselves.
Help. Me escape syria
But in any building people make internal changes which change properties of building so...even if this is build some joe will drill though a wall to make open space dinning room
@@stxrmyrl509 On the contrary, people were left alive because there were single-storey buildings in poor areas. a site that was advertised as the strongest buildings in the city completely collapsed. Unfortunately, the state does not impose a standard on the contractors in this regard, they steal materials as it suits them, if it continues like this, a much more terrible Istanbul earthquake awaits us..
An earthquake is certainly a unique experience. We had one a couple years ago in Idaho and it was my very first experience with one. The sensation it gives your body is very unique to only an earthquake. It's nothing like a rollercoaster at all. When the ground shakes beneath you and everything is moving, your body and equilibrium become very disoriented and you can't help but feel like you're drunk or high. In my opinion, it's one of the worst natural experiences a human body can endure, even if you're an adrenaline junkie
I've always found the experience a little unsettling, but interesting and curious. But I've only experience 3-4 scale earthquakes, which are extremely minor, and leave me wishing I'd paid more attention while they were happening (they catch you off guard, of course). I can imagine anything over a 5 or 6 would be quite a horrible feeling.
i tried 7.5 and 6.5 only this month in syria😢
I experienced up to 7. During 2005 in Pakistan. Experience is very frightening. It's always better to DROP YOURSELF, GET COVER, AND HOLD ON.
i've experienced turkey earthquake forget about shaking that adrenaline bump goes off but what doesn't go off is when u see collapsed buildings with people in it everywhere you go collapsed if u live in country like turkey everywhere is thief contractor imagine buying a house with 3 million turkish liras and it collapses in seconds and u are with your family in it even 1 week after that earthquake streets smell like corpses you can imagine the rest of it
Meanwhile, us experiencing earthquakes 2-3 times every 3 weeks. It isn't really much of a surprise. We've become used to it already that we can identify the intensity (not specifically of course, just the general scale) of the earthquake through feeling itself just by how strong the ground shakes and the lateral movements of the buildings. Perks of living within the Pacific Rim of Fire. Scale 5-6 are strong but not that much destructive than 7 and above
This is the world's largest 3D shaker table. It is located at the E-Defense facility, part of the National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Prevention in Miki City, Japan.
whats its max strength, any idea? can it shake to like 13 on the richter scale?
@@deepakchermakani7542 Not sure. I believe it has been used to test up to magnitude 9.
@@douro20 thanks for the info
ok but how fun is it to ride
Japan my ass that was in Colorado
Impressed with those interior walls; no cracks afterwards.
Good thing wood has some flexibility to it and won't crack like cement.
@@ChiliCheeseD0g It is about resonance frequency. Any material has it. Unfortunately earthquake generated frequency often match building frequency. Any material cracks when the wave matches its frequency.
@@ChiliCheeseD0g Concrete.
Every time you mix up concrete with cement, a civil engineer's calculator runs out of batteries.
@@ChiliCheeseD0g what about fire?
@@bestopinion9257 not in tokyo tho lol
This is amazing, thanks so much for this whole testing series I really enjoyed watching it.
Hi Nathan, Thanks for stopping by and watching it! We're glad you enjoyed our video.
@@strongtie hi man how are you doing
Yea especially when you are in turkey or syria
@@mohammadal-kamsha4020 LMAO
the building is literally wobbling like jelly
i know
Ikr
It is supposed to otherwise it would just collapse
@@namitajimmy6737 Yeah, like a tree, it has to bend or it’d tip on MY HOUSE- I have a huge tree in my front yard and in storms I am always scared that it’s gonna fall on my house!
Imagine
They should try it for 1,5 minutes like it was in Turkey
Could easily withstand it. 1,5 minutes is nothing compared to magnitude 8.5-9.0 quakes that lasts 5-8 minutes in Chile, Alaska and Japan. BUILD BETTER BUILDINGS!
nie ingilicce konusuonuz lan
@@TheKampocyamuzu assdfghjklş
@@ozzX92 ce cutremur ai auzit tu sa tina 5 minute?
@@ozzX92 not only the magnitude tells how strong the earthquake is. Get your facts right dude
Turkey - earthquake - 1 day - 50 000+ dead, 100 000+ injured, 1 000 000+ homeless
Pray for us 🙏
Let Sweden join NATO first.
@@sergiobastos4274 Wow i never thought someone with enough brain to text would make a correlation between the earthquake and nato. Thanks for surprising me.
@@sergiobastos4274 Oh a peterson fan, his fanbase is very consistent with the amount of intellectual power they put on their comments which is near zero.
@1:09 there’s a crack of splintering wood. Also unless there are added weights somewhere, this isn’t realistic because there’d be many additional tons of cladding, roof, windows, doors, interior drywall, plumbing, flooring, appliances, fixtures, furniture, full hot water heaters, and people and all their stuff. The shear loads would be much higher than tested.
If you look close the walls do have drywall on them. They just aren't painted. I see your point though.
You should try the test with full building, furniture and appliances.
On top of budget and all that I think having any machine carry and shake the tons and tons of steel and concrete is probably impossible to build today.
And people 😆
@@GameDevAraz Probably weight of people too. And it is not funny at all.
Really? 1:44
The worst thing with larger earthquakes is that the shaking persists for much, much longer than the one in this test
This test was modeled on the Loma Prieta earthquake which lasted 15 seconds and resulted in 63 deaths and 3,757 injuries.
This is why we all need to inspect our own work when setting ATS systems. Let’s not wait for the inspector to tell us something doesn’t look right.
you still have to pay him/her though. Might as well as let them do their job.
I survived the big one in 1989; 6.9 loma prieta. Houses which were well build all survived. Wooden houses really are the best; unless you go with reinforced concrete or steel.
It was so LOUD in the Earth Science building at Stanford. We were all noticeably deafened afterwards.
Turkiye's 7.8 magnitude earthquake was 120 seconds long. For more accurate results, it should take longer.
2 separate earth quake together were 120 second long
@@lazorplayz4556 Does it matter? There is only 9 hours between two earthquakes.
@@canerongoren k
This is AMAZING!!! This can save so many lives,and could save so many people in Turkey 🙏🏼
sorry to tell you but it's too late.
i like those people . they always come up with the best solutions. here's a good example of them taking this more seriously than anyone else in the world.
yeah, those people as opposed to our people who attack their own capitol.
Anyone got this on their recommended during the Turkey-Syria outbreak??
I got strong tie on all my sheds and the house I just built in Florida. Great stuff!!
Was the duration of this test long enough? How long do earthquakes typically last? This seemed short.
Relax. It's just a demonstration. And you ever heard of Google? Go look up how long they last
you could just search tokyo 2011 earthquake, no buildings collapsed.
@@jamesfranko1568 ya only a few 150+ year old roofs collapsed, and a few fancy ceilings/lights in expensive restaurants and such. there's a video of skyscrapers swaying in tokyo that i found astonishing. the only harm i'm aware of was mainly from hoarders who had their stuff fall onto them.
@@ayaanyani5521 japan earthquakes come from 500 km from down icra ..turkey earthquake happend 18 km to surface..so it is many times bigger then japan earthquakes because it is in surface.. although japan seen 9 magneitute..7.9 and 7.5 turkey earthquake much more deadly..japan will have smililar results if same happend in surface although they claim best in building engineering at leart in turkey people dont live in caves too..New buildings collapesed too
@@sforza1903 you are partially correct. The earthquake in Turkey was closer to the surface.
However, saying that Japan would have similar results is objectively wrong. The problem in Turkey is the poor build quality/corrupt inspections, which does not exist in Japan to the same level.
That corner shelf saved the whole building. Amazing!
We need to take into account that there are no water pipes. Gas pipes anything that can catch fire. So structure wise it passed.
In the case of gas, it is dangerous, so the system we have now is to shut off the gas supply as soon as a strong tremor is detected.
This system is located throughout each house and in the middle of pipes, minimizing the impact if a pipe breaks.
The earthquake destroyed the hearing in my left ear.
1:35 now I know where the creator of (a rather giltchy) earthquake simulator roblox got the room idea from.
We must make that kind of structures in Turkey.
the problem in Turkey is the ground . I also saw people remove columns because of their store just because to have more space in the 1st floor which is such a huge mistake .
I have family in Izmir , and most of the buildings are up in the hills which requires really really good solid and stable structure . But as we saw last year same thing happened.
If it is a flat ground alright but up in the hills the structure must be planned more seriously . It sad that those architectures tried to get away from the country when everything happened . For them the important thing is only the money
@@denissadak2521 I totally agree and there is no monitoring, there is this government that takes bribes.
this is a retrofit, a quick solution for already built wooden houses, Turkey should try something which is basically copying the Chilean code of building
@@olekatoska1901 The new building code in Turkey (uptaded in 2018) is way more disiplined than Japan. But the problem is in bad execution, lack of control and corruption on old houses. I really envy Mexico and Chile. The absolute solution is to build two story houses like in US and Europe.
@@denissadak2521 We have already forgotten old earthquakes that happened back in history and built concrate houses on plains and alluvium grounds. Most collapses happened on that kind of terrains. All we need is to follow new building codes carefully and control it on progress.
Australia earthquake was magnitude 7.4, 1 building fell. Turkey earthquake was 7.6 magnitude. 15000 buildings fell. How?
The problem is, even if these small structures are built to withstand and 7.5 earthquake, does not mean they are safe. So many smaller buildings were crushed by larger buldings collapsing on top of them. We have a long way to go to make cities safer.
Magnitude? Duration?
1:36 everything was hold together by that shelf
1:42 This looks like a 10.1 magnitude earthquake.
who did you find the 0.1? lol
Tell me you ve never seen an earthquake, the 7.8 one in Turkey looked far more scarier than this
Temos que adotar essa tecnologia de construção urgente.
what if it not empty. Full + full ?
They should try on 9.5 magnitude, just like in 1960 valdivia earthquake
Yes, but wood does age way faster than concrete. I am curious about the outcome of the test if the building was 10 years old.
tokyo had 9.0 magnitude in 2011 and zero modern buildings and skyscrapers collapsed
@@jamesfranko1568 Yes, because they are build with that in mind, out of concrete :P
depends on whether it's anti-seismic or not
Wood structures age? As long as the wood is kept dry it lasts for lifetimes. The main reason some areas around the world use wood vs concrete is just based on availability of resources.
Do you not see trees that last for a thousand year exists lol
тряханули неплохо, но дом стоит на жёстком ровном основании, а вот если бы ещё к этому неравномерно просаживался и вспучивался фундамент, как происходит в реальность, я бы посмотрел что бы вышло...
Все равно выглядит прочнее того хлама который настроили в Турции. В Японии в 11-м таких разрушений и близко не было при магнитуде в 9.
2 minutes ???? İn Turkey it lasts nearly 2 minutes
from what we have seen from 4 major earthquakes and their footage from turkey in past 5 years. earthquakes dont just shake you left and right in almost every instance the surface of earth is litteraly bouncing up and down flexing and bending looking like a litteraly jelly cake cooled in fridge. some buildings no way in hell can survive that.
They made extra sure to build that right, whereas in most cases contractors get lazy and forget shit or cut corners. Not all the time but I've seen it.
true, I've seen it to.
1:42 imagine if it was 10.0 magnitude.
Imagine if that were over 9000.0 magnitude. Imagine if earth were real.
@@ramdas363 seriously bro the earth 🌎 will not be seen. It can't handle a huge earthquake
A 10.0 is the equivalent of 2 times the entire world's Nuclear Arsenal, or 1 million Hiroshima Nuclear Bombs. It would be nearly 6 times more powerful than the 1960 Valdivia earthquake (Most powerful earthquake on record) and was felt/detected 6000 miles away from the epicenter. It would be 22 times more powerful than the 2004 Boxing Day earthquake/tsunami that killed 280,000 people. It would be nearly 2,000 times more powerful than the 1906 San Francisco Earthquake that killed 3,000 people and destroyed 80% of San Francisco. And 89,000 times more powerful than the 1994 Northridge (Los Angeles) Earthquake that caused an estimated 100 billion in damage
My right ear enjoyed the audio experience
When you are going to sleep but a powerful bass boosted music come from your neighbor while having a big party struck your house 1:40
But it took only few seconds. Normally this big earthquake takes more than 1 minute. Then we can see if this building can handle or can't
And it cost like 5? 7? 10? times more than build a usual building? So unfortunately we are far away from starting to build such buildings...
I think it is possible to build structures in a way where the 'design itself' can keep it from collapsing. Putting extra material into the construction to brace it more to me is just more added weight, and as you suggested - more cost.
For instance why hasn't anyone thought of designing a frame that is flexible enough to have a backup system designed into it in the event (let's say) a joint beam comes apart from another joint beam? Why can't both of those loose ends fall into another part of the frame design to keep it from coming apart?
Physics would have to be played with and included into such a test. How about adding cables in with the frames, cables to keep the structure from coming apart? Maybe some kind of puzzle design? Joints that can catch onto something else to keep it in the general place its supposed to be?
In my view it is the frame that holds up the structure and so it should be the frame that should have designs within it that keeps it all from coming apart? This concept can be tested just by itself alone to see how it would work, make improvements on the design and then build the finish on it and see how the theory works out as a full unit?
Everyone keeps building things with a cookie cutter concept. Think outside of the box and make it fun to design. These videos can offer a lot of information if people study them a lot more to understand the physics more.
1:38 when grandpa falls down the stairs when you are about to eat breakfast.
If there was a live load on the ceilings, then I doubt that the structure would fail. Since the seismic force would be much greater.
What was the Richter scale?
Can I access the test results?
Those people living in the top floors really get a scary ride
What is the peak acceleration?
As a Agean Turk, i experienced many Earthquakes in my life, after big earthquakes happen in my city, a lot of more earthquakes happen everyday for months, i experienced earthquake in toilet, while studying, while sleeping, in the school and school bus and more.
What about in Hatay and Katahanmaras?
@@dontinsultmyprevioushandle unfortunately, there is nearly no more city where people can live as they used to. for both cases in hatay and maraş, all you can see is collapsed buildings around streets even if not, most of all are highly damaged. government possibly does not reveal the actual death rates or injuries. it is said that rates are "at least" 3-4 times higher which is around 150-200k, and that's horrendous. and still, government does not hesitate to hide the truth and cancel any sort of help for the sake of money. the governmental institute kızılay, the ONLY purpose of them was to save the people who are desperate. they sell donated blood, and tents which were prepared to be DONATED for the victims of any sort of disaster. they are way eviler than the devil itself. by the way, expectedly earthquakes are still happening, and many of them are greater than 4 mw.
1:39 Huge 7.5 Earthquake happens
'
what kind of material build the model house...
concrete / cement / metal / wood are big different strength of material...
earthquake have few different ways of position shakes
please test turkey last earthquake with the same duration,scale and the upward accelaration. after we can talk.
Hocam zemin falan da önemli. Ayrıca videodaki olay sadece ahşap evlere yapılıyormuş.
1:37 just the movement itself scares my pants off, family and I would be flying everywhere is terrifying on its own..
Hmmmm, interesting. I wonder what people would look like standing on that shaker?
Why this room looks exactly like the game from roblox that i played from 2 years ago
Add more weight in it , put doors and windows and floor tiles , and so many stuffs , also weights of human
So where is the test?????!!!!!
Earth quake doesnt have a shority off all time of shaking the earth
I can't tell if they're inside or outside
Test by a single quake only !!! But most of the buildings collapes by a number of quakes during a massive earthquake including main shock and after shocks.
Would like to know where the ties are.. they at the base at the forms?
11 years and still buildings keep falling
11 years ago???!!!
And so far we haven't seen any implementations??
what scale earthquake is this simulating?
Imagine if Turkey had this. 50,000 + lives could have been saved.
Yeah
This thing only shook for like 5 seconds, do two of these earthquakes for a minute each then we can see if it really is strong
Diaphragm sheathing fixed to timber frame as shear wall?
In my opinion the degree level should be raised and the time of the shock lengthened. We can never know how strong an earthquake will ever be and how long it may last.
Turkey needs this.
But what is the magnitude?
6.9
This test is misleading on so many levels. It will take a lot of time to write down in a youtube comment the "little" things what would make a difference... for example : Not only a 20 seconds earthquake, the corrosion of the building through years, appliances like tiles ... so on so on.
We all cheered on that light...
GOD'S BLESSINGS AND PROTECTION VICTORY TO JAPAN!AMEN
But when you enlarge the building things would be totally different I believe
👍
The height is irrelevant the size is depending on the frequency of the seismic waves.
@@ottomanslapx7157 make it with concrete instead, much heavier and not as flexible ...
@@gabrielc6252 tell that to tokyo that survived 9.0 quake over a decade ago. Majority of buildings in japan today especially in cities are concrete
@@jamesfranko1568 a what? who told you that lie? 😅
old videos really like to be popping from right side
Sorry but it continues only a few seconds. It was said that it kept shaking nearly one minute in Turkey then the big damage occurred.
i was designing this minimal earthquake tests when i was highscool kid in 2003, unfortunately i grew up in turkey, my shit friends, my dumb teachers were laughing at me, my mind was diving into these kind of dreams and my lecturers were thinking i am stupid and not interested with lessons, i had many troubles about stupid lectures, garbage turkish education system and many other things, now this systems and many other invensions are blinking at me from someone elses hands, when i die, giant ideas will be burried too. actually i am seeing that people are growing, many ideas has been found, i swear i was living with current many inventions 20 years before with only some drawings and calculations on paper. whatever but it hurts
1:38 where is this filmed? the windows are covered up
This is from the inside of the building which you see from the outside earlier in the clip.
@@mitkoogrozev First one has windows open, this one has windows covered up. Looks lie under ground somewhere
Kahramanmaraş earthquake was like this, the lamp was hitting the ceiling
It is still standing and probably no one inside would have died BUT would it still be safe to live in??
6-storey wooden building. It may be earthquake resistant, but not against time. The walls may be wooden, but the load-bearing columns must be steel or concrete (or hybrid).
It’s only an experiment, out of possibly hundreds more tests not seen in the video, practical applications can come after they define the conclusions
You can't build tall big buildings by wood. The solution is to mount a suspension under the building. But of course that is expensive.
How much magnitude
How much Mw was applied? Looks like >= 7.5 Mw.
What is the reading on Richter scale of the earthquake you guys imitated in this video?
7.5
People in 2050:
1:37
Guy: Oh, it's shaking!
Gal: Don't worry, just wait... 🤗
All in the streets: 2:05
A plywood structure?
Outside it looks like 3.1 earthquake but inside it looks like 9.6 magnitude earthquake
Magnitude of Earthquake is how much.Can it withstand upto 9.5 magnitude
Not sure if the inertia of a filled in building is neglectible (it would behave a lot worse with stuff moving around inside). But they're a lot smarter than me so I assume every variable was taken into consideration.
You do make a good point though. This structure is indeed tons lighter. If all of the added materials were on it, in it then it might make a difference. Brick? Heavy furniture? People, it all adds up.
My epileptic friend liked this so much, he’s dancing on the floor right now
why testing on an unhabited and unfurnished, and only 1 earthquake?
Did they account for the 1000mph movement of the globe or was the test based on a non moving stationary plane?
Artık ana sayfada depremle ilgili bir şey görmek istemiyorum aşırı soğudum
Aynen. Soğumaktan ziyade psikolojim bozuldu..
No building can resist without critical structual damage against magnitude 7.8 shallow earthquake lasting for 2mins and on top of that hit by 7.5 shortly after. As happened in south turkey / north syria recently
11 March 2011 write and watch Tohoku Japan earthquake.
what is the test magnitude?
For what i heard, it was a 7,5 Ritcher scale, but there is anoher one with a concrete buidling with 9.0 ritcher scale simulation.
I think the Sacsayhuamans Cusco Peru contractor & the Egyptian Pyramids is the best.
50 years, 100 years or 200 years warranty?
This video is in everyone's recommendations after Turkey Syria Earthquake
Great but how strong exactly was this quake in this test??? 🤔 And how could this building withstand it? Lots of crucial information missing here!!! 🤷
For me it looks fun in the test but in real life i will run for my life
I think shaking duration was too short. May be at least 1 minute.
This was one of five tests modeled on the 1994 Northridge earthquake ground motions recorded at Canoga Park. That quake only lasted 10-20 seconds. According to wikipedia: "The death toll was 57, with more than 9,000 injured. In addition, property damage was estimated to be $13-50 billion (equivalent to $24-93 billion in 2021), making it one of the costliest natural disasters in U.S. history." seblog.strongtie.com/2019/07/designing-resilience-neeswood-capstone-a-decade-later/
are they using wood ????