dont estimate that tall metal column will be fix ... it will definitely plastificate near fixed base and will behave more like pinned one.... so brace your tall steel!
@Asusisuful Each structure has it's own natural frequency. Like for example, a tuning fork has a natural frequency when you hit it. No matter how hard or where you hit the tuning fork it will vibrate at that natural frequency. When the table vibrates at the natural frequency of the structure it begins to resonate. This means the waves add and the vibration of the structure becomes bigger as shown in the video.
@NairoukhMouhannad Resonance frequency is a function of the mass of the system, and the stiffness of the system. The formula ω² = k/m is the basic formula to determine natural frequency (or resonance). k is also a function of length: k = (AE)/L, where A is the cross section area of the spring member, E is youngs modulous of that member and L is the length. So the equation for resonance can be re-written as: ω² = (AE)/(mL). This shows that the natural frequency is inversely related to length.
@NairoukhMouhannad (Sorry, hit the character limit). So, when we increase the length, the natural frequency shrinks. Inversely, decreasing the length with increase the natural frequency. This lab is demonstrating that effect.
Tall Buildings have high fondamental vibration period (low frequency), so are more sensitive to low frequency shaking. Conversely, short buildings with low fondamental period( high frequency) are more affected with high frequency shaking...
I've seen this years ago. This guy was able to make an entire steel bridge vibrate by attatching this small device to one of the support beams. If he left it on there it would have been possible to eventually bring the entire bridge down.
The flexibility of the tall one will let it stay together and not break as much, the middle one should mostly be affected because there was a study and medium sized buildings are mostly to break.
great demonstration. I was wondering if there is a method or an app that lets you measure the horizontal vibration against the vibration of the strings.
Going through the analysis and developing your response spectrum you're essentially creating an envelope based on site conditions and building frame type. From there once the period is known you get your Ss, S1...and so on. If you picture these three models as different points on that curve it's easy to see how changing your period (direct function of frequency) can move you back and forth to the design S values. It's pretty neat if you ask me.
How to survive an earthquake with a high frequency : Build taller. How to survive an earthquake with a low frequency : Build smaller. How to survive any earthquake : Live outside.
Well isn't that interesting ,,,, I was watching japanese girls playing at the beach,,, I tell you I sure learn alot about stuff I never heard about before on youtube,,, now I think I will type in 56 chevy and see where I end up next!
This is not a good test, he changes the speed of the push / pull arm and this exceeds the ''uprights'' ability to stay rigid. He basically, just found the limits of the metal based on the load and height of the design... Playing devil's advocate... I could argue that this is the side profile of a bridge that can ride on rails and the attached columns are ''free standing columns supported by two ''wire columns'' .... Totally, cannot think of a real World situation for this upright design... perhaps steel columns with a an unsupported span with a ''roof load''... So, NO lateral bracing ? Which building code would allow for this ? Especially, under the potential loading conditions presented? Again, he changed the speed of the arm and this reversal of direction is sudden on each end... it does a 180 degree about face! This creates a jerking motion that would probably cause shear failure long before this design would wobble as presented... I am bias on this... ( I like to disclose my bias position -- it helps to know you are bias and in that way, you can open your mind up to new data and possibly a new conclusion)... If, you want to comment or are triggered to reply to my comments... please do so, but please, do not add more data than what is presented by this video...
Actually this experiment should be tried as P and S type of waves like real earthquake.You can be right.And after watching this experiment I think why little houses which generally built 2 floors in Japan doesn't crush.
Very good demonstration of resonance! As well as a good demonstration of the deflected shape of a fixed-fixed column!
dont estimate that tall metal column will be fix ... it will definitely plastificate near fixed base and will behave more like pinned one.... so brace your tall steel!
@Asusisuful Each structure has it's own natural frequency. Like for example, a tuning fork has a natural frequency when you hit it. No matter how hard or where you hit the tuning fork it will vibrate at that natural frequency. When the table vibrates at the natural frequency of the structure it begins to resonate. This means the waves add and the vibration of the structure becomes bigger as shown in the video.
@NairoukhMouhannad Resonance frequency is a function of the mass of the system, and the stiffness of the system. The formula ω² = k/m is the basic formula to determine natural frequency (or resonance). k is also a function of length: k = (AE)/L, where A is the cross section area of the spring member, E is youngs modulous of that member and L is the length. So the equation for resonance can be re-written as: ω² = (AE)/(mL). This shows that the natural frequency is inversely related to length.
I typed random letters on the browser and ended up here. Such an awesome video!
@NairoukhMouhannad (Sorry, hit the character limit).
So, when we increase the length, the natural frequency shrinks. Inversely, decreasing the length with increase the natural frequency. This lab is demonstrating that effect.
Tall Buildings have high fondamental vibration period (low frequency), so are more sensitive to low frequency shaking. Conversely, short buildings with low fondamental period( high frequency) are more affected with high frequency shaking...
I think thats the main point here (to design our height based on the ground type or soil comdition )thanks!
:)
They showed your video on the news last night.
I was looking for this video...thnx man
I've seen this years ago. This guy was able to make an entire steel bridge vibrate by attatching this small device to one of the support beams. If he left it on there it would have been possible to eventually bring the entire bridge down.
perfect demonstration , thank you !
Great experiment.
The flexibility of the tall one will let it stay together and not break as much, the middle one should mostly be affected because there was a study and medium sized buildings are mostly to break.
This is better than any physics books
Do you have any tests with varying width of same height object? How does larger width affect the resonance frequency? Thanks
this is where dubstep is created
Awesome demo!
Very nice experiment: Natural frequencies are higher for shorter beams
great demonstration. I was wondering if there is a method or an app that lets you measure the horizontal vibration against the vibration of the strings.
Which one do girls like though?
all of 'em
The one she enters into resonance and all her body vibrate !
Whichever is the most expensive
It depends on their natural frequencies, which is unique to every individual.
Mine 😏
Thats brilliant i was looking for that
Seismic response Spectra explained without words.
How?
Going through the analysis and developing your response spectrum you're essentially creating an envelope based on site conditions and building frame type. From there once the period is known you get your Ss, S1...and so on.
If you picture these three models as different points on that curve it's easy to see how changing your period (direct function of frequency) can move you back and forth to the design S values.
It's pretty neat if you ask me.
@@TitleistGuy Thanks a lot :)
Love this, thanks so much! Can you tell me the heights of these?
Muito bom!!!!!!!!!!!!
Excelente demonstração.
Very nice demonstration.
What Motor is used in this experiment. Thanks in advance
Science is freaking awesome
good demonstration that they have some of torsional vibration ?, thanks
Really nice demonstration!
THX
Very Good Presentation
So how frequency connected with magnitude of an earthquake ? I'm mean is there a type or something defines that or it's like a random thing ?
VERY GOOOOD DEMONSTRATION! THX!!
Hi! Can I use long parts of this footage (giving credits) for an educational video I will upload to my channel?
Can you please tell us , you have captured this video,what is the frame rate of the camera?
Good experiment 👍
will 2Hz (half) affect the tallest one?
If anybody knows, is it possible to purchase a machine like this and where to find one? Thank you!
it clear many doubts
So low frequency earthquake is more danger to high building and high frequency is more danger to low building
It is usually because the earthquake machine is so tired that it doesn't want to climb up the long tower anymore
What type of linear actuator is this, belt?
It looks like a lead screw stepper motor
Is this a sine sweep?
Those are like dancing buildings
Good Work
amazing! i can't believe im seeing this on utube. tesla baby!
Сколько надо Hz арочному, консольному, семипролётному мосту длинной - 684.5м. шириной - 28м. ЯП-расшатал.
+ALEX XELA Не надо ЯП расшатывать) да и раскачивать тоже)
Thnx!
What is resonance?
Can someone explain to me why resonance occur for each particle separately . Does it depend of length of each one or what ??
Yes indeed
How to survive earthquake : make really high skyscraper
Minh Duc Dinh
How to survive an earthquake with a high frequency : Build taller.
How to survive an earthquake with a low frequency : Build smaller.
How to survive any earthquake : Live outside.
hell ya
You could even say it's...
Dancing
sembra il rumore della mia lavatrice quando è in fase centrifuga
Its same like earthquake affect to buildings
Holy fucking shit. Is this the technique that Tesla followed when making that supposed earthquake destroying invention of his? I think...?
Wow!
Great
Hallo JEM!
Hello my fellow classmates doing math homework right now
Resonance = self frequency
Somehow, this gives me dirty thoughts.
Spin cycle activate!
nice
I feel sorry for the lead screw nut!
so sick
Earthquake resonances
This shows kind of how H.A.A.R.P works with magnetic resonances.
Well isn't that interesting ,,,, I was watching japanese girls playing at the beach,,, I tell you I sure learn alot about stuff I never heard about before on youtube,,, now I think I will type in 56 chevy and see where I end up next!
This is not a good test, he changes the speed of the push / pull arm and this exceeds the ''uprights'' ability to stay rigid. He basically, just found the limits of the metal based on the load and height of the design... Playing devil's advocate... I could argue that this is the side profile of a bridge that can ride on rails and the attached columns are ''free standing columns supported by two ''wire columns'' .... Totally, cannot think of a real World situation for this upright design... perhaps steel columns with a an unsupported span with a ''roof load''... So, NO lateral bracing ? Which building code would allow for this ? Especially, under the potential loading conditions presented?
Again, he changed the speed of the arm and this reversal of direction is sudden on each end... it does a 180 degree about face! This creates a jerking motion that would probably cause shear failure long before this design would wobble as presented...
I am bias on this... ( I like to disclose my bias position -- it helps to know you are bias and in that way, you can open your mind up to new data and possibly a new conclusion)...
If, you want to comment or are triggered to reply to my comments... please do so, but please, do not add more data than what is presented by this video...
Actually this experiment should be tried as P and S type of waves like real earthquake.You can be right.And after watching this experiment I think why little houses which generally built 2 floors in Japan doesn't crush.
bro what tf i just failed physics cus of u
hola
This shit is stressing.
하... 시발
Female Engineer - This is not a woman, this is not an engineer 😀😃😄