I play something simlir to following the winner on the 2 dozenz but with columns and play both dozens and columns at the same time, but not always... Increase my bet if one misses and keep at base bet if both hit.
6 neighbor fibonacci sequence has been by far my most favorite and most successful strategy youve shown on this channel, however, i was wondering, is there a way to tweak it to make it even better? 🤔
Yes I prefer playing the two dozens. I have played them Dalembert with success but also when adding 2 units on a win while adding only one unit on a loss (Will Vegas). The latter, for me requires a reasonable profit goal to stop or do so after a winning streak.
i think it is better to play the fibonnaci system on 1 koiom and 1 dozen together. bets are smaller and when you hit you win. Here you have to hit one of the dozens and the kolom to win.
Gregg I recon the single dozen could dtart with a higher value, say 50 dollars, as you are going down 10 and only up 5, as the bet shouldn't get too out of hand. And you get to win a few more times before you complete the Dal. Great video mate as always
Cheers Tekka. I know what your saying, like in this example, win 2 in a row and you have to pull it off the table. However mathematically speaking it should lose twice for every one time it hits. So even tho your going up just 1 unit, your doing it twice as often. Having said that, you're probably right about starting at $50 with a 1k bankroll
I like playing 2 dozens the way you did here and 2 columns at the same time using same D'Alembert progression. Single dozens and columns can get tasty far too quickly.
On a serious note has anyone heard about never betting on 1st dozen 1st column.due to those not coming in as often as the other two,due to layout of the wheel numbers?
@CasinoMatchmaker no when I play blackjack in Manchester England players got 2 cards and dealers got 1 card then players hold or busted then dealers play
I have tested all 3 systems and they all failed. I must especially warn against the Fibonacci progression with 13 numbers: I tested it in Excel with 10,000 numbers that came up in the land casino and there was a losing streak of 19.
@@CasinoMatchmaker Chief, read his ID, it says LORD and for Lords 200 is peanuts....lolzzzzzzzzzz.......ask him to send you $200k if he wants to see $20000 win.....😆
I play something simlir to following the winner on the 2 dozenz but with columns and play both dozens and columns at the same time, but not always... Increase my bet if one misses and keep at base bet if both hit.
Good First Time Not Following The Winner I Like That Style.
It worked this time haha
6 neighbor fibonacci sequence has been by far my most favorite and most successful strategy youve shown on this channel, however, i was wondering, is there a way to tweak it to make it even better? 🤔
It's a hard one to beat
Yes I prefer playing the two dozens. I have played them Dalembert with success but also when adding 2 units on a win while adding only one unit on a loss (Will Vegas). The latter, for me requires a reasonable profit goal to stop or do so after a winning streak.
Did I read that right?
ADD 2 units on a win and ADD 1 unit on a loss?
That is correct. Worked well in practice and then for real.
i think it is better to play the fibonnaci system on 1 koiom and 1 dozen together. bets are smaller and when you hit you win. Here you have to hit one of the dozens and the kolom to win.
Gregg I recon the single dozen could dtart with a higher value, say 50 dollars, as you are going down 10 and only up 5, as the bet shouldn't get too out of hand. And you get to win a few more times before you complete the Dal. Great video mate as always
Cheers Tekka.
I know what your saying, like in this example, win 2 in a row and you have to pull it off the table.
However mathematically speaking it should lose twice for every one time it hits.
So even tho your going up just 1 unit, your doing it twice as often.
Having said that, you're probably right about starting at $50 with a 1k bankroll
The problem with the two dozen D Al, is the total bet goes up so fast. With two or three more losses at your low point you would have been down 1K
Would resetting after getting into session profit be better than keep betting so high into the progression?
If you get into session profit the bets should naturally reset throughout the Dalembert
I like playing 2 dozens the way you did here and 2 columns at the same time using same D'Alembert progression. Single dozens and columns can get tasty far too quickly.
I think that would be the best way to play.
2 dozens and 2 columns Dalembert Style !
How would that play out? +1 on all and -1 on all until new session profit?
Did anyone else say "chicken dinner!" When Greg said winner winner? Lol
Yes so funny
On a serious note has anyone heard about never betting on 1st dozen 1st column.due to those not coming in as often as the other two,due to layout of the wheel numbers?
I've not heard of this.. Do you mean not betting on them at the same time?
Surely they have the same probability as any other numbers?
Just use fibonacci on coloum and both dozen make all bets same, second option ....3x martingale all 3 bets when win rest
Nice
Just quick question why blackjack dealers have only 1 card at start?? Dealers giving players 2 cards
They have 2 cards, one face down
@CasinoMatchmaker no when I play blackjack in Manchester England players got 2 cards and dealers got 1 card then players hold or busted then dealers play
I have tested all 3 systems and they all failed. I must especially warn against the Fibonacci progression with 13 numbers: I tested it in Excel with 10,000 numbers that came up in the land casino and there was a losing streak of 19.
Only losing on the sim.🤔
Genius gamble is an oxymoron
What a waste of time only 200 win
$200 in 20 minutes is a waste of time?
@@CasinoMatchmaker Chief, read his ID, it says LORD and for Lords 200 is peanuts....lolzzzzzzzzzz.......ask him to send you $200k if he wants to see $20000 win.....😆