Why Mars Is The Hardest Planet To Land On

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • Over the last 50 years, spacecraft have landed on over half a dozen worlds. But nowhere has proven more treacherous than the Red Planet - Mars.
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Following is the transcript of the video:
    Landing on Mars is easier said than done. Over the last 50 years, spacecraft have landed on over half a dozen worlds. Including Venus, Saturn’s moon Titan, a comet, and more. But nowhere has proven more treacherous than the Red Planet - Mars. To date, only 40% of attempted landings have been successful. But just looking at it, Mars seems pretty harmless, right? It doesn’t have toxic clouds like Venus. And there’s plenty of flat, stable places to land, unlike a comet. But here’s the thing: It’s not what you can see that’s the problem. It’s what you can’t: The atmosphere.
    Mars’ atmosphere is 100 times thinner than Earth’s. Because Mars’ atmosphere is so thin, it makes parachutes less effective. 10 times less effective, in fact. So, let’s say you could skydive on Mars, and you use the same-sized parachute as on Earth. On Earth, skydivers hit the ground running at around 20 mph. But on Mars, you’d be falling at 200 mph on impact. Not good. Now, you could make your parachute larger to slow down more. And that’s partly what NASA does. For example, its Curiosity rover used the largest supersonic parachute at the time, when it landed in 2012.
    But even that couldn’t slow Curiosity down, enough. To see why let’s go back to skydiving. If you wanted to slow down to the same landing speed (20 mph) on Mars as on Earth you’d need a parachute that’s 10 times wider. Or about 110 feet in diameter. Wide enough to cover the length of 2.4 school buses. Now, here’s the catch: NASA’s Curiosity rover weighs about 13 times more than the average human. Which means, to slow down to the same speed, it would need an even bigger chute. One that was 400 feet in diameter. But, in reality, Curiosity’s parachute was nowhere near that size. It was only 70 feet in diameter.
    Why? Because the bigger the chute gets, the greater the chance it will rip. In fact, the largest parachute ever built and tested was just 150 feet wide. So, in the end, it’s physically impossible to build a parachute big enough. Which makes landing on Mars risky at best. So, how do space agencies do it? Very carefully.
    First, the spacecraft deploys its giant parachute to slow down as much as possible - usually to around 200 mph. Then, it fires retrorockets to take it the rest of the way.
    And that might not sound so hard but if the parachute doesn’t deploy at the right time, or the rockets don’t fire at the right height, it’s all over. To date, only three space agencies have ever tried to land on Mars: NASA, the European Space Agency, and the former Soviet Union. None have a perfect record.
    So, if landing on Mars is so hard, why do we keep doing it in the first place? Besides the Moon, Mars has more artificial instruments on and around it than anywhere else in the solar system. And you could say that’s because Mars is close by. Or that it might be the best spot to search for signs of alien life. Or could it be that with each successful new landing we come one step closer to the grandest ambition of all: To become the first species ever to inhabit a world beyond our own.
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Tech Insider tells you all you need to know about tech: gadgets, how-to's, gaming, science, digital culture, and more.
    Subscribe to our channel and visit us at: www.businessins...
    TI on Facebook: / techinsider
    TI on Instagram: / tech_insider
    TI on Twitter: / techinsider
    INSIDER on Snapchat: insder.co/2KJLtVo
    ------------------------------------------------------
    Why Mars Is The Hardest Planet To Land On

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @saeku6398
    @saeku6398 5 років тому +614

    Shouldn't have looked in the comments section.

    • @gkentsef_
      @gkentsef_ 5 років тому +4

      @@damnpineapples8247 people call it logic, not sanity

    • @gkentsef_
      @gkentsef_ 5 років тому

      But doesnt matter as well

    • @whogavehimafork
      @whogavehimafork 4 роки тому +2

      Yeah it's a cesspool down here. Should've just dropped a like and moved along

  • @WindowsSaturn
    @WindowsSaturn 5 років тому +1263

    No, Uranus is hard to land on

  • @ashtoni8683
    @ashtoni8683 5 років тому +2003

    You think Mars is hard?? Try to land on Jupiter

    • @nathanhidajat8997
      @nathanhidajat8997 5 років тому +88

      No, Jupiter is a gas giant.

    • @EntitledCamClips
      @EntitledCamClips 5 років тому +213

      Nathan Hidajat whoosh

    • @v9468
      @v9468 5 років тому +181

      Nathan Hidajat that was the point of the comment Jupiter is harder cause its made of gas and theres no surface

    • @shreymadmental258
      @shreymadmental258 5 років тому +26

      Never be able to land

    • @dikuyho538
      @dikuyho538 5 років тому +3

      Super

  • @JustinY.
    @JustinY. 5 років тому +707

    Tell that to Mr. Musk.

  • @SeverinusDewantara
    @SeverinusDewantara 5 років тому +630

    It's gonna be harder to land if you keep using miles and feet and pound bs

    • @matheusbarbosa700
      @matheusbarbosa700 5 років тому +57

      Exatly, I'm brazzilian and i don't understand nothing in feet, Miles or pounds, using metric sistem and Kilogram " KG " Is so more easy to everybody understand

    • @afox1689
      @afox1689 5 років тому +33

      its not our fault your knowledge is limited to the metric system

    • @massir7769
      @massir7769 5 років тому +24

      Lol NASA uses the metric system.

    • @thegreath.sapiensapien6907
      @thegreath.sapiensapien6907 5 років тому +3

      Humanity will colonize the whole universe one day, mars are nothing, watch the next generation whose coming

    • @jtstoic
      @jtstoic 5 років тому +11

      Guero Rodriguez who is saying the imperial system is better than the metric system

  • @Space_Maniac
    @Space_Maniac 5 років тому +91

    1950 : "Landing on the moon is the greatest ambition of humanity"
    1970 : "Landing on mars is the greatest ambition of humanity"
    2020 : *Tries For the 255 Time To Land On Mars*

    • @74wf
      @74wf 4 роки тому +3

      Ksp

    • @kencrocken
      @kencrocken 2 роки тому +3

      Starship would do it

  • @markcarey8426
    @markcarey8426 5 років тому +16

    That first sentence got me. "Landing on Mars is easier said than done." I personally think it would be very difficult. I can't even get off Earth.

  • @Taikamuna
    @Taikamuna 5 років тому +159

    Could you even use captions with the metric system?

    • @natsudragneel5723
      @natsudragneel5723 5 років тому +3

      Sorry uhm who are you again?

    • @lureh683
      @lureh683 4 роки тому

      Natsu Dragneel his name means in finnish ”magic-egg”

    • @tanojatmakuri380
      @tanojatmakuri380 4 роки тому +3

      Sorry but who are you this is an American channel (but yeah metric is easier)

    • @rjallenbach1
      @rjallenbach1 4 роки тому +9

      TANOJ GAMING American channel taking about science, which uses metric. Including NASA which is both American and a metric system user 🤣

    • @rjallenbach1
      @rjallenbach1 4 роки тому +2

      Sorry, we’re a little behind here in the US. Really the video should be using metric and have standard (mph, feet / inches) in the captions

  • @amartyasen2880
    @amartyasen2880 5 років тому +160

    Tech Insider : Why Mars is there hardest planet to land on
    Jupiter : Hold my beer

    • @watamelon1457
      @watamelon1457 5 років тому +5

      Sun: Amateurs

    • @ntuk0035
      @ntuk0035 5 років тому +1

      Earth: I’m just glad to be here

    • @Hola654
      @Hola654 5 років тому +2

      Pluto: IM A PLANET OK

    • @MarkMcDaniel
      @MarkMcDaniel 4 роки тому +1

      @@Hola654 -- Pluto is the Tyrion Lannister of planet, merely a dwarf.

    • @Alab.A
      @Alab.A 4 роки тому

      @@shreyaspatil2321 coz it's all gas

  • @bosheek8632
    @bosheek8632 5 років тому +140

    Can you please use SI international units like the rest of the world?

  • @reborninchrist8074
    @reborninchrist8074 5 років тому +68

    No space agency has the perfect record of reaching the mars
    ISRO: Hold my fuel

  • @Yasin_2312
    @Yasin_2312 4 роки тому +8

    Mars: I may not be a gas planet but you can’t land on me
    Venus: hold my atmosphere

  • @hamzaderiche9416
    @hamzaderiche9416 5 років тому +80

    Come on guys it cant be that hard.... its not like its rocket science

    • @einc70
      @einc70 5 років тому

      Budget.

    • @farzanaafrinn
      @farzanaafrinn 5 років тому +7

      george new acount copper copper channel migration r/woooosh

    • @mirai4652
      @mirai4652 5 років тому +4

      *literally is rocket science*

    • @001-q1s
      @001-q1s 5 років тому +3

      einc70 r/whooooosh

    • @plant5875
      @plant5875 4 роки тому

      @george new acount copper copper channel migration That's actually easy on paper lmaoooo

  • @RaphaelFassy
    @RaphaelFassy 5 років тому +27

    Could you use metric units please? I couldn't understand how big the parachutes are.

    • @RaphaelFassy
      @RaphaelFassy 5 років тому +5

      @Joao Rocha definitely not

    • @waimuncheah9863
      @waimuncheah9863 5 років тому

      @@RaphaelFassy Google the info. Knowledge is easy to obtain if you care to search.

  • @agentwhite1
    @agentwhite1 4 роки тому +5

    magine being an alien on mars and seeing a thing with 6 wheels looking at you

  • @Danymok
    @Danymok 4 роки тому +8

    There are a few problems with this video:
    First of all they use the imperial system which sucks.
    Secondly, they didn't explain why it's harder to land on Mars than on a comet (which btw a comet is harder to land on so they were wrong). Mars' atmosphere is infinitely thicker than that of a comet's (which has none)
    Third, if humans land on Mars, we wouldn't be the first species ever to land on a planet other than our own, at least we wouldn't be sure if aliens already did outside of their own planets. The ending made no sense.

    • @himanshupawar2398
      @himanshupawar2398 2 роки тому

      1. Imperial system does suck.
      2. Comets have no atmosphere, but they also have negligible gravity due to their size. In fact, a better term would be "attaching a spacecraft to a comet" rather than "landing on it".

  • @PremiumAphid
    @PremiumAphid 5 років тому +187

    Why land on Mars when you can land on the sun? 🤷🏼‍♂️ There is much more to explore!
    P.S. I'm getting close to 4k!!!!

    • @terraxgaming4117
      @terraxgaming4117 5 років тому +11

      No BcAusE yOU woUlD DiE R u DumB?

    • @iktbratosindaniel8672
      @iktbratosindaniel8672 5 років тому +2

      @@terraxgaming4117 our sun is not a rocky planet

    • @PremiumAphid
      @PremiumAphid 5 років тому +1

      @@terraxgaming4117 oof

    • @PremiumAphid
      @PremiumAphid 5 років тому +1

      @@iktbratosindaniel8672 lol

    • @PremiumAphid
      @PremiumAphid 5 років тому +1

      @Jumpy Cat I subbed to you too, but it doesn't look like you post any longer 😂 thanks!!

  • @pew-series7626
    @pew-series7626 5 років тому +119

    3:17
    Elon Musk: hold my beer

  • @KrishnaRao-81
    @KrishnaRao-81 5 років тому +26

    Just for the information guys, ISRO never landed anything on Mars, it just Orbited a satellite around it. Peace out ☮️ But I hope it'll do that soon.

  • @gabrielavilabolanos7540
    @gabrielavilabolanos7540 5 років тому +112

    I thought getting a good gpa was hard to land on :/

    • @kushjedi2217
      @kushjedi2217 5 років тому

      Gabrielavila Bolanos lol you still worried about a gpa?

  • @TheExoplanetsChannel
    @TheExoplanetsChannel 5 років тому +116

    True! Btw a new Tabby star has been discovered !

  • @sonupyt3090
    @sonupyt3090 5 років тому +6

    People : Mars is hard to land on
    Jupiter : *HOLD MY BEER*

    • @rainify5711
      @rainify5711 5 років тому +1

      SonupYT Gaming try to come up with something original next time bud.

    • @sonupyt3090
      @sonupyt3090 5 років тому

      @@rainify5711 *aLrIgHt MaTe*

  • @ianang8977
    @ianang8977 5 років тому +33

    I need metric pls

  • @dialatedmcd
    @dialatedmcd 5 років тому +4

    "we'll become the first species ever to inhabit a world beyond our own"
    this guy has explored all galaxies through all time, impressive.

  • @mylifeisamememylifeispathe3140
    @mylifeisamememylifeispathe3140 5 років тому +185

    You know what else is hard!

  • @IwzArt
    @IwzArt 4 роки тому +4

    I've been wondering about people who want to live on planet Mars. After traveling around 9 months, how do people feel about Gravity when they arrive on Mars. I've seen video's that astronauts can't walk after 6 months in space on earth. I don't know how it works on Mars.

  • @mikderoost9261
    @mikderoost9261 5 років тому +9

    That last sentence dripped with ignorance bliss and arrogance

  • @BSJINTHEHOUSE420
    @BSJINTHEHOUSE420 5 років тому +80

    Because it has the high ground.

  • @TheEman2047
    @TheEman2047 5 років тому +4

    tech insider: Mars is the hardest planet to land on
    Elon Musk: Have you tried Earth?

  • @raz0229
    @raz0229 5 років тому +4

    The only thing I know about MARS is that once you get there, You become MARTIAN!
    _And Mother EARTH won't accept you anymore!_
    .
    .
    .
    .
    _What? I watched it in the movie!_

  • @BobMcCoy
    @BobMcCoy 5 років тому +68

    *Saturn is the hardest planet to land on*

    • @nathanhidajat8997
      @nathanhidajat8997 5 років тому +5

      Not just that, Mercury doesn't have an atmosphere and we might crash without strong jets. Mercury has low gravity on its surface but, higher during landing.

    • @ianang8977
      @ianang8977 5 років тому +6

      Nathan Hidajat nah pretty sure saturn is harder

    • @rexergamn2646
      @rexergamn2646 5 років тому +5

      I think Jupiter would be harder

    • @afox1689
      @afox1689 5 років тому +7

      saturn has no surface

    • @ianang8977
      @ianang8977 5 років тому +4

      that’s the joke...

  • @TTuoTT
    @TTuoTT 5 років тому +7

    Unless you have self-landing rockets like SpaceX

  • @oren7404
    @oren7404 5 років тому +1

    One thing____________________On earth normal parachute _______slows from 50m/s to 5m/s which is 112miles/hr to 11.2miles/hr not 20miles/hr

  • @waynesitarz424
    @waynesitarz424 5 років тому +17

    "To become the first species ever to inhabit a world beyond our own". How do you know that?

  • @ishanim6193
    @ishanim6193 4 роки тому +1

    Title: *Why Mars is the hardest planet to land on?*
    Opportunity and spirit: *Hold my beer.*

  • @Astinel
    @Astinel 5 років тому +3

    I can't even perfectly land on the floor when I fall from my double deck bed.

  • @mr.swanandvidwans1558
    @mr.swanandvidwans1558 5 років тому +2

    Isro's Mars mission? You should have mentioned that

  • @jitendraloganathan4375
    @jitendraloganathan4375 5 років тому +4

    Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO)'s Mangalyaan is currently orbiting Mars.

  • @obamngaaa
    @obamngaaa 3 роки тому

    "Mars is the hardest place to land on"
    Mercury: *hold my 300+ craters*

  • @markuspl4y
    @markuspl4y 5 років тому +3

    Why dont they just put 3 small parachutes instead one big one?

  • @LORDVADER357
    @LORDVADER357 5 років тому

    Landing on Mars requires full frame technologies and DTOL. Diagonal take off and landing. Spaceship/capsule should land horizontally/diagonally pretty much like airplanes land. Deploy the draggers behind. Draggers will slow down it. Also parachoute or actualy the umbrella will be attached on rotary joint and connected to reverse thrust turbine. And will be preopened. Ship/capsule will enter upper layers of Mars with open umbrella.

  • @averyrowan
    @averyrowan 5 років тому +3

    Mars: shut up human life
    Earth : :(
    Mars: ha ha
    Earth : shut up
    Mars: I’m the hardest planet to land on
    Jupiter: excuse me?

  • @knowtube8186
    @knowtube8186 5 років тому

    Sorry to break it out to you but ISRO(India Space Research Organisation) has also landed on Mars and has a perfect record, landed in the first time.

  • @alecapo5193
    @alecapo5193 5 років тому +2

    2:17 "Ohhh booooy ! ...........400feet " Yep that is also the feeling I get when I can't understand the measurement system you are using

  • @Danymok
    @Danymok 4 роки тому

    "To become the first species ever to inhabit a world besides our own"
    Aliens be like: "bruh"

  • @CrateFX
    @CrateFX 5 років тому +22

    USE METRIC

  • @TheYolakabola
    @TheYolakabola 5 років тому +1

    How would wings work on mars?

  • @LB-bx4ee
    @LB-bx4ee 5 років тому +3

    OMG have you heard about the metric system?

  • @crashed-in4945
    @crashed-in4945 5 років тому +1

    Title:
    Why Mars is the hardest planet to land on
    Proxima Centauri b:
    Hold my beer

  • @Karthik-yy7gw
    @Karthik-yy7gw 4 роки тому +4

    My crush lands successfully as an astronaut.
    Sends a message to Check if she's fine..
    She replies - I need a space.

  • @captain12211
    @captain12211 5 років тому +2

    You can use a Grasshopper L.F Engine to slow your fall though......

  • @polarisgemini52
    @polarisgemini52 5 років тому +31

    The number of Indians in the comments section who can't tell the difference between landing and orbiting...........

    • @Kn-iu4fv
      @Kn-iu4fv 5 років тому +1

      What if ISRO plans to burn retrograde at apogee (it still has some fuel left) and then make mars orbiter crash land on Mars? This would be a great plan once they accomplish all objectives of being in orbit :-D

    • @aditya_saha
      @aditya_saha 5 років тому +1

      @@Kn-iu4fv it would simply become a defunct satellite orbiting around Mars

    • @polarisgemini52
      @polarisgemini52 5 років тому +2

      @@Kn-iu4fv Depends on if it has enough fuel to make the satellite orbit a projectile. That way, it would hard land like the moon impact probe. That maybe useful or useless depending upon if the devices' in it capable of measuring anything useful while falling.
      Other countries have done unwanted hard lands on many occasions.

  • @moe2579
    @moe2579 4 роки тому +1

    I get it. flying vertically (up) is easy on Mars. But falling is harder due lack of air resistance.

  • @aditya_saha
    @aditya_saha 5 років тому +13

    So how do they do it?
    "Very carefully"

  • @medhasrikanth7917
    @medhasrikanth7917 5 років тому

    Indian space mission ISRO to Mars also was successful in the first attempt in the year 2014 . This point is missing in your video.

  • @kingbubby8768
    @kingbubby8768 5 років тому +4

    They can't find parking

  • @rachnasingh4369
    @rachnasingh4369 5 років тому +1

    3:29 Isro has also landed on mars and has perfect record of landing in 1st attempt

  • @darkmann12
    @darkmann12 5 років тому +13

    metric...

  • @stratvar
    @stratvar 5 років тому

    It would have been nice if you used the metric system in captions while you were mentioning the values, so that the rest of the world can understand them.

  • @mark2167a
    @mark2167a 5 років тому +3

    Great video but it does not defend the claim in the title.... Why is it harder than other planets?
    This kind of assignment would get me a c or d in high school for not answering the question. Even more so it can be considered clickbait.... I was waiting for a comparison but was cut short with the same explanation as usual....

    • @someguy3987
      @someguy3987 5 років тому

      It was pretty apparent to me... Very thin atmosphere but more massive than a comet or the moon - parachutes would be less effective and you'd need more force from retro rockets to slow down.

    • @mark2167a
      @mark2167a 5 років тому +1

      Then try landing om Mercury, No parachutes or aerobraking

  • @nguyentrinhquanganh1494
    @nguyentrinhquanganh1494 5 років тому +2

    Jupiter : No, It’s actually me.

  • @drewwagner5227
    @drewwagner5227 5 років тому +3

    Jupiter: *breaths*
    Everyone: *dies*

  • @4july99
    @4july99 5 років тому

    That was good thanks. U said only 3 agencies have tried. What other ones are there? Are u counting commercial companies?

  • @shreyaspatil2321
    @shreyaspatil2321 5 років тому +6

    Indians please stop this !!
    Don't embarrass us .

  • @JZGreengo
    @JZGreengo 5 років тому +1

    Landing anything sounds harder than said

  • @shashwatroy1442
    @shashwatroy1442 5 років тому +29

    India has also landed on mars.
    It was launched on 5 November 2013 by the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). It is India's first interplanetary mission and it made it the fourth space agency to reach Mars, after Roscosmos, NASA, and the European Space Agency. ... The launch window was approximately 20 days long and started on 28 October 2013

    • @lightr2187
      @lightr2187 5 років тому +31

      Not landed.. orbiting.. the only special thing about it was that ISRO able to do it cheaper and in first single try(which was like let others do the hard work and testing first)

    • @hardiksinghvi9615
      @hardiksinghvi9615 5 років тому +6

      Thats exactly what i thought but then i remember that actually, it was orbitting mars and not landed on mars
      It did it in the cheapest way by the way

    • @polarisgemini52
      @polarisgemini52 5 років тому +11

      Don't know about Mars but something sure did hard land on your head

    • @rahul777yo4
      @rahul777yo4 5 років тому +6

      Delete this before 9 year olds arrives here and starts racism

    • @a7c7q7
      @a7c7q7 5 років тому +1

      Its orbiting u know its hard to land on mars

  • @GioBarreira
    @GioBarreira 4 роки тому +1

    what if your parachute is made of metal? it won’t rip..

  • @JeffTjebkes
    @JeffTjebkes 5 років тому +8

    Because it’s colder then ummm idk? Its just super cold.

    • @joanne589
      @joanne589 5 років тому +7

      Jeff Tjebkes Umm Mars is colder than earth and Antartica what are you talking about? Mars is farther away from the sun.

    • @markuspl4y
      @markuspl4y 5 років тому +2

      @@joanne589 It was a joke

  • @markuspl4y
    @markuspl4y 5 років тому +2

    "Why Mars Is The Hardest Planet To Land On" What about Saturn?

    • @nathanhidajat8997
      @nathanhidajat8997 5 років тому

      Other than Mars, Mercury can be difficult for me to land on because of high acceleration in its orbit and I need a lot of engines to land safely. I landed a rover on Mercury without it smashing onto the surface.

    • @markuspl4y
      @markuspl4y 5 років тому +4

      @@nathanhidajat8997 Do you talk about Kerbal Space Program or what?

  • @markuspl4y
    @markuspl4y 5 років тому +3

    Well you know... Moon doesnt even have a Atmosphere :)

    • @a7c7q7
      @a7c7q7 5 років тому +6

      Its smaller so weaker gravity

    • @thomaswijgerse723
      @thomaswijgerse723 5 років тому +1

      Well, no atmo is easier then a little atmo, because on mars you still need a heatshield whicb are heavy, and tricky to decouple while descending, not on the moon.

  • @mohammadfarooque6844
    @mohammadfarooque6844 5 років тому

    Couldn't they fix a foam below it? After landing the machine will remove the foam?

  • @priyesh3357
    @priyesh3357 5 років тому +4

    What do you say an elephant on Mars????
    .
    .
    .
    .
    *Mass on Mars*
    Ok I'm sorry

  • @chapusa100
    @chapusa100 4 роки тому +1

    Why cant we use 4 parachutes and place the rover in a balloon that will pop open on landing?

  • @tobblesmash6193
    @tobblesmash6193 5 років тому +3

    Mars is the toughest planet to land on? Try landing on a gas giant.....

    • @ninofromkitchennightmares1497
      @ninofromkitchennightmares1497 4 роки тому

      Tobblesmash Mars is the toughest
      Because gas giants have no Surface so You won’t land on Anything

  • @kennygroth4938
    @kennygroth4938 4 роки тому

    This video does a great job making people believe that we dont have the technology to land a multi billion dollar spacecraft on Mars.

  • @MidnightBloomDev
    @MidnightBloomDev 5 років тому +3

    Because Elon's species already livev there

  • @justindark270
    @justindark270 5 років тому +2

    Neptune might be the hardest of them all hands down.

  • @sidhantmanchanda
    @sidhantmanchanda 5 років тому +19

    I guess India landed 'mangalyaan' in one try :)

    • @missionaryfailed7455
      @missionaryfailed7455 5 років тому +21

      Mangalyaan is a 'satellite' orbiting Mars

    • @sidhantmanchanda
      @sidhantmanchanda 5 років тому +6

      @@missionaryfailed7455 oh okay ! Thanks

    • @Akash-1---9---9---7
      @Akash-1---9---9---7 5 років тому +7

      Nah! The one that India sent was an orbiter and not a lander. Mangalyan is there just to orbit the red planet

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 5 років тому

      Its a sattelite...

    • @rzzzcena23
      @rzzzcena23 5 років тому +6

      Delete it bfore some racist comments comes

  • @ddddbbbb3546
    @ddddbbbb3546 5 років тому +2

    R.I.P. curiosity

  • @ileenrandle3558
    @ileenrandle3558 5 років тому +3

    STOP NASA NEVER BEEN TO MARS

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 5 років тому

      Prove it.

    • @ileenrandle3558
      @ileenrandle3558 5 років тому

      Carlos_A_M my comment is not For Trolls ty

    • @CarlosAM1
      @CarlosAM1 5 років тому

      @@ileenrandle3558 nasa has been to mars. Theres video and proof of it!

  • @srajjad
    @srajjad 4 роки тому

    I don't think that mars would be ever colonized in real sense but it will become a laboratory and experimental ground for scientists on missions who would conduct experiments there and will fly out of there.

  • @Jan-cz4ez
    @Jan-cz4ez 5 років тому +1

    Imagine if we landed on mars and some scientists said that it was no longer a planet

  • @Cameron-wg5pc
    @Cameron-wg5pc 4 роки тому

    Pluto: Am I a joke to you?
    Yes I know Pluto isn't technically a planet but whatever

  • @shuryimaziz3426
    @shuryimaziz3426 3 роки тому +1

    shouldn't the moon and mercury be harder to land on because there atmospheres are thinner than marses

  • @RC-bw2pl
    @RC-bw2pl 4 роки тому

    India
    It is notable that Mangalyaan achieved something for India that no other country has yet achieved. India is now the first country to reach Mars on its first attempt.Sep 25, 2014

  • @obamngaaa
    @obamngaaa 3 роки тому

    Landing on every planet (and moon):
    Mercury: Pretty hard- no atmosphere means no parachutes, also slowing down to orbit Mercury is just pain.
    Venus: Moderately hard- It would be easy if it wasn't for the scorching temperatures.
    Moon: Quite Easy- Though it has no atmosphere, it has pretty low gravity, meaning not much fuel is needed to land.
    Mars: Hard- The thin atmosphere ain't very good at slowing down spacecrafts, meaning you'd need to use both parachutes and engines to slow down.
    Galilean moons: Basically the same as our moon
    Titan: Very easy- Not much reentry heat, low gravity and very dense atmosphere means that you only need a parachute and that's it.
    The rest (except gas giants) are easier than the moon

  • @shyamaanil3266
    @shyamaanil3266 5 років тому +2

    When you parachute fails
    OH SHOOT

  • @LegalLiam
    @LegalLiam 5 років тому +1

    Mars: I am the hardest planet to land on!
    *Uranus has joined the chat*
    Uranus: u sure boi?
    *Mars has left the chat*
    *Jupiter has joined the chat*
    Jupiter: hi
    *Uranus has left the chat*
    *The sun has joined the chat*
    The sun: **BOI**

  • @liamtiam8828
    @liamtiam8828 4 місяці тому

    Maybe instead of increasing the diameter of the parachute u can increase the quantity of parachutes

  • @madjackblack5892
    @madjackblack5892 5 років тому

    The Soviets had a parachute system for heavy drops that used little rockets to slow down the load before impact. I'm sure the Russian Airborne has continued using that and probably improved it greatly. I find it hard to believe that all the folks working this problem didn't immediately opt for a similar solution in such thin atmosphere.

  • @petergarcia8225
    @petergarcia8225 Рік тому

    You could also use props. Like a gyro powered by solar and propetual fuel.

  • @reptilexcq2
    @reptilexcq2 3 роки тому

    He said not using retro rockets at the right time can causes failure? How? If you use powerful rockets, would that not have offset the speed of the falling object at any moment in time? I understand it has a thin atmosphere and so the rockets must work harder, but still it should work.

  • @bestbits3453
    @bestbits3453 5 років тому

    Please do check some facts, ISRO, the Indian Space Agency has also landed on Mars on its Mangalyaan Rocket and it did so on its first attempt!

  • @No-uk4ci
    @No-uk4ci 3 роки тому +1

    Ohhhh so thats why i cant land on mars with a parachute in simplerockets2

  • @nutellaontoast4281
    @nutellaontoast4281 3 роки тому +1

    Idk, i feel like a tiny planet next to a black hole that is made of gas and rly far away would be harder to land on.

  • @roycantrell2606
    @roycantrell2606 5 років тому

    Will glasses like helium help landing? Balloons instead of chutes or chutes with helium bladders?

  • @brianroberts5740
    @brianroberts5740 2 роки тому

    Interesting. I never thought about the atmosphere being so thin that a parachute would be ineffective.

  • @lianakim0813
    @lianakim0813 4 роки тому

    Amazing! Well said. Really attractive with fantastic video clips!

  • @sdnotessanthosh1535
    @sdnotessanthosh1535 3 роки тому

    Bruh mars's atmosphere is so thin due to the lack of a magnetic field which protects it against cosmic radiation and solar winds. Since its solid iron core solidified, it lost its magnetic field. So the sun's Ray's are constantly striping away its atmosphere

  • @the_sleepdeprived_man2746
    @the_sleepdeprived_man2746 5 років тому

    That's why I kept crashing on Mars in Spaceflight Simulator.