2vs1 INTERCEPT | F-5 E3 Tiger II Vs Mig-25 Foxbat | Digital Combat Simulator | DCS |

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 вер 2024
  • Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidew...
    APEX PCs: apexpartner.ap...
    Check out Thrustmaster: bit.ly/tmpromogs
    Join the channel if you wish to support
    / @growlingsidewinder
    If You'd like to Support the Channel on Patreon:
    / growlingsidewinder
    J-10 MOD: forum.dcs.worl...
    Join my Discord:
    / discord
    Amazon Links for the products I use if you're interested:
    _________________________________________________________
    Link for Thrustmaster 16000M: amzn.to/2PQGYf2
    Link for Trackir 5: amzn.to/2VSN4kt
    Link for Warthog throttle/stick: amzn.to/2Vbfhyp
    Social Media
    ________________________________________________________
    Twitter: / growlingaim9
    Facebook: / growlingaim9
    Contact me:
    GrowlingSidewinder@hotmail.com
    Disclaimer: Please Note that I use sound effects to enhance my videos for dramatic effect and hopefully give the viewer more immersion and also I use reshade for some better colors. (you can download reshade yourself and use it to make your DCS look like mine).
    Processors: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X 16-Core 3.4GHz (4.9GHz Max Boost)
    Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS Elite WiFi
    Memory: 128GB CORSAIR VENGEANCE RGB PRO 3200MHz (4x32GB)
    System Cooling: CORSAIR H100i PRO XT RGB
    Graphics Cards: NVIDIA 10GB GeForce RTX 3080
    Operating System: MS Windows 10 Professional
    Operating System Drive: 2TB Samsung 970 EVO Plus PCIe NVMe
    Hard Drive: 2TB Samsung 980 PRO
    Power Supply: CORSAIR AX1600i ATX Titanium
    Tobii Head and Eye Tracking: www.tobii.com/
    Virtual Reality: Pimax 8KX
    HeadTracker: Trackir5
    Thrustmaster F/A-18C Hornet stick and Warthog Throttle.
    Thrustmaster TRP pedals.
    On this channel we like to do a lot of dogfighting most videos are some sort of dogfight between 2 different aircraft as we explore their different capabilities. From time to time I like to dabble in Virtual Reality, I think VR is a great new technology and I love to show that stuff off for the channel from time to time.
    If you enjoy war thunder or Microsoft flight simulator 2020 or even dogfighting in Battlefield 2042, consider getting yourself into Digital Combat Simulator by Eagle Dynamics, the Combat side of Aviation with the BVR and Dogfights really provides a different and interesting perspective on aviation. You can fly all kinds of combat aircraft including the F-16, F-15, F-14, JF-17, Su-27, Mig-29, Mirage and the F-18 Hornet along with many other aircraft and helicopters like the Ka-50 and Mi-8.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 454

  • @GrowlingSidewinder
    @GrowlingSidewinder  2 роки тому +73

    Check out the Merch Store: growling-sidewinder.creator-spring.com
    The F-5 is an awesome little bird don't underestimate this thing, but ya I'm really enjoying this challenge thing in the last couple videos, thanks for watching guys, see you in the next one. Much Love.

    • @Anarchy_420
      @Anarchy_420 2 роки тому +4

      Please🙏 MIG-28/F-5 VS MIG-29 Dogfight!
      Older fictional VS newer real! Both flying their respective Soviet/Russian colors of their time!👍

    • @cvillalobos27
      @cvillalobos27 2 роки тому

      That's why we still have them. Modernized so even more deadly

    • @stefanqq1
      @stefanqq1 2 роки тому +1

      Ohhh shit that second clip scared me hard and send my phone flying

    • @Stinger522
      @Stinger522 2 роки тому +1

      Another awesome video, Growling. Now I dare you to go up against two MIG-31s with the F-5. I bet you would get atomized everytime.

    • @nigelsmith7366
      @nigelsmith7366 2 роки тому +3

      I wish someone made a F20 Tigershark

  • @orzorzelski1142
    @orzorzelski1142 2 роки тому +292

    "I'm not going to defend super-aggresively" - it was at this momemt that we knew, GS screwed up.
    "It went underneath, we're good"
    GS vs interceptors = gold mine of last words.

    • @cumnakurtz9969
      @cumnakurtz9969 2 роки тому +7

      F-22 flashbacks

    • @alannickelson9565
      @alannickelson9565 2 роки тому +5

      Very.
      I wasn't the only one that winced when he said that? Maybe a countdown too?
      :) Never seems to fail! :)

    • @Mobius118
      @Mobius118 2 роки тому +3

      2:05 … uuuuh overconfidence killed the cat?
      btw definitely recommend having a cat for a pet, a miniature tiger in your home is pretty cool

  • @stephan0532
    @stephan0532 2 роки тому +362

    The moment you explained how the R-40 is a rather primitive missile so you wouldn't defend it too aggressively, I immediately said to myself: "Well, and in a few seconds you're gonna get smoked by that thing. Would be a very typical moment on this channel..."
    I just love your content man. It's always interesting to see nice aircrafts and helicopters being flown in DCS by someone who knows his stuff, while discussing combat aviation and still enjoying a nice bit of humor. That's the reason why I am a subscriber of this channel.

    • @nagantm441
      @nagantm441 2 роки тому +4

      what was primitive about the R-40?

    • @liu6898
      @liu6898 2 роки тому +3

      @@nagantm441 guidance of course

    • @stephan0532
      @stephan0532 2 роки тому +7

      @@nagantm441 The R-40 is a relatively old missile being designed in the 1960s. It was one of the first radar guided missiles in the world. That means that its guidence, as explained by liu, wasn't very good, resulting in a lower probability of kill (PK).

    • @nagantm441
      @nagantm441 2 роки тому

      @@stephan0532 for it's intended role, to shoot down bombers, it's pretty good.

    • @deadwolf2978
      @deadwolf2978 2 роки тому

      Well said.

  • @davidzanelli6847
    @davidzanelli6847 2 роки тому +314

    “So, it’s a pretty primitive Russian missile”
    *dies*
    “Ok, listen-“
    Great stuff as always, keep it up!

    • @echodelta2172
      @echodelta2172 2 роки тому +18

      GS' collection of famous last words should be made into a compilation

    • @tzodearf2596
      @tzodearf2596 2 роки тому +3

      That was hilarious. Great theater, the suspense was palpable. Then it happened again. Two resurrections, then victory!

    • @SoApost
      @SoApost Рік тому +1

      Never underestimate your opponent

    • @Thect
      @Thect Рік тому +3

      "Ok, listen ..."
      dies again

    • @keithmuir5077
      @keithmuir5077 11 місяців тому

      oh my god that was hysterical!

  • @Zolbat
    @Zolbat 2 роки тому +207

    a bit of extra information: The notch's full name is "notch filter", which some of you might already know from audio processing or other information processing. That's exactly what it is, the radar filters out the ground because otherwise it would be way too much useless data. The wider the notch filter, the more it can deal with noise and be sure what it detects is an actual fast moving object, the downside is - as shown in the video - it also filters out possible threats. Higher quality radars can therefore "get away" with using a smaller notch, making almost perpendicular moving objects more likely to be detected

    • @novahovekh9985
      @novahovekh9985 2 роки тому +10

      This is helpful thanks 👍

    • @MrDino1953
      @MrDino1953 2 роки тому +12

      Finally, a full explanation. Thx.

    • @gb7418
      @gb7418 2 роки тому +1

      What makes a radar higher quality?

    • @retardmoguss
      @retardmoguss 2 роки тому +5

      @@gb7418 the better ability to differentiate between ground clutter and actual moving targets in the air. Radar is a very complex stuff so whatever we say is extremely simplified. Better radar comes with more modern radar after more development is done

    • @gb7418
      @gb7418 2 роки тому

      @@retardmoguss ah _ on the software side of things interpreting the patterns?

  • @cj41079
    @cj41079 2 роки тому +7

    GS: they have primitive missles...
    Splash lol
    Mig: And you were saying? 🤣

  • @DyslexicDancer
    @DyslexicDancer 2 роки тому +47

    That's not the F-5, it's the Mig-28 :)

  • @furn2313
    @furn2313 2 роки тому +32

    I'm soo glad you explained the notch position got me scratchin' my head for a while. This is why this channel is the best at DCS 👌

  • @-kavonb5017
    @-kavonb5017 2 роки тому +15

    "I get it. I understand what's going on!", you just need 3+ lives and all will be good.

  • @Crossbone_Vanguard
    @Crossbone_Vanguard 2 роки тому +75

    Imagine someone throwing a rock at you and you go like " lol that's a primitive weapon I don't need to move".
    good stuff, your videos are always fun!

  • @JessidGallardo
    @JessidGallardo 2 роки тому +97

    You should do the US vs Russia thing again but with the rule that you can't choose the same jet twice so it's more interesting.
    Do like 5 or 6 rounds so you can have different engagements.
    Also make it bandit unknown so you have to choose your jet carefully.

    • @radiod698
      @radiod698 2 роки тому +6

      This man is dedicated.

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +16

      That's how you end up facing a Raptor in a Yak-3.

    • @cannekill2158
      @cannekill2158 2 роки тому +9

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 Yak might actually win lmao

    • @RT42069
      @RT42069 2 роки тому

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 he already faced a Raptor in a Mustang

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому

      @@RT42069
      I'm aware; it doesn't seem like a scenario you'd want to repeat.

  • @wambathewisefool2893
    @wambathewisefool2893 2 роки тому +61

    I guess I love the F-5E videos more than all others. The scrappy lil' cheap to maintain dog fighter is my favorite of the "Nimble ones"...would love to see a F-20 on here.....F-5 on steroids....

    • @peterweller8583
      @peterweller8583 2 роки тому +2

      Or a F1F 1F

    • @therocinante3443
      @therocinante3443 2 роки тому +6

      I always wished the tigershark became a reality beyond prototype, it's one of th greatest looking jets ever

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +9

      F-20 = F-5 with a personal trainer
      F/A-18 = F-5 on steroids and HGH
      F/A-18E = what the F-5 believes is it's ultimate form
      ND-102 = F-5 reaching it's actual ultimate form

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +3

      @@therocinante3443 I'm curious what would have become of the Northrop Fang had it been selected over the Starfighter.
      Mind you, the N-102 succeeding might mean the N-156 is never designed and that would be a tragedy.

    • @mustang5132
      @mustang5132 2 роки тому

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 didn’t the 156 come long after the 102?

  • @frightfulbuffalo7081
    @frightfulbuffalo7081 2 роки тому +8

    4:48 that made me jump dude. 💀

  • @sohrabroozbahani4700
    @sohrabroozbahani4700 2 роки тому +4

    XD just as GS said primitive I was like, oh boy that face is going to get primitived like... boom... 😅🤙💯...

  • @matthewkroening
    @matthewkroening 2 роки тому +5

    Additional unpopular opinion: The Foxbat-E is my #1 most wanted REDFOR jet in DCS. There's something about the purity of a single-/limited-role aircraft that appeals to me, specifically big interceptors with big missiles. Don't even get me started about the split nozzles on the R-40 - it's such a unique design and looks badass as it boosts off the jet.

    • @sparrowlt
      @sparrowlt 2 роки тому +2

      If used properly as it was intended (and not like a dogfighter .. as the Iraqui found out) its a very dangerous plane..and very tactical..as its suposed to do high speed dashes at enemy aircraft..lock with its basic but very powerfull radar.. fire , hope to keep lock and then turn arround and run away

  • @allanaitch204
    @allanaitch204 2 роки тому +13

    Those impacts get me everytime.

  • @tippership
    @tippership 2 роки тому +13

    Hoping we get more content with Mig 25's , Mig 31's and SR -71's - after all, that hornet shootdown was by a foxbat who then just literally outran EVERY other fighter jet in the air - We don't get enough of these hit and run attacks from the few mach 3 ish jets out there!
    Like, could Growling Sidewinder have done this against 2 human players doing hit and runs at literally top speed? I don't think he'd be able to get a solution at all on two foxbats doing mach 2.8 - mach 3 , while doing hit and run strikes......
    Well played! Here's strongly hoping for more Foxbat/Foxhound/Blackbird material- it's ridiculously fascinating to see how powerful speed is, in a world today where it's forgotten(and stealth is all the rage- but stealth / merging / your usual firing angles and solutions won't give you a kill on someone at Mach 3)

    • @slate4687
      @slate4687 2 роки тому +1

      It didnt outrun anyting in that occasion...just sneaked up on a US strike package...

    • @tippership
      @tippership 2 роки тому +1

      ​@@slate4687 just checked the stories of Mig 25's to be sure and You are correct, while there are incidents reporded of Foxbats with insane feats like outrunning Eagles and everyone else, especially during kuwait- the particular F18 incident did not involve the foxbat using it's speed afterwards. It was other engagements where foxbats did that to the US

    • @slate4687
      @slate4687 2 роки тому +1

      @@tippership yes in an occasion in 1999 an Iraqui Mig 25 crossed the no fly zone and a couple of F14Ds plus a couple of USAF F15Cs attempted to intercept it..The Tomcats fired a one AIM 54 each wich both supposedly malfunctioned and the Eagles fired AMRAAMs towards the thundering foxbat wich managed to evade the missle volley turning around and going balls to the wall

    • @RaderizDorret
      @RaderizDorret 2 роки тому +1

      The Foxbat and Foxhound can't do Mach 3 for long. Every Foxbat that tried it wound up melting its engines and the Foxhound is hardwired to never exceed Mach 2.8. Operationally speaking, both are limited to Mach 2.5 to extend engine life. The Foxbat almost got another kill during Desert Storm, by the way. One of them managed to score a hit on an F-15C that managed to limp back home.

    • @acedogboy8421
      @acedogboy8421 8 місяців тому

      @@RaderizDorret foxbat/hound are limited to 2.8 for safe operating speeds. 5 mins @ mach 3.2 for the foxbat is enough to break from any engagement tho

  • @LoScorpioneRosso1
    @LoScorpioneRosso1 2 роки тому +3

    2:06 I was eating and now my chips are all over the room

  • @magnanimus9692
    @magnanimus9692 2 роки тому +2

    ~~Round 2~~
    GS: "Ok listen, I stand by what I said, it's a primitive missile and can easily be defeated"
    Foxbat: "How many times do I need to teach you this lesson, old man?"

  • @ironkrieg3368
    @ironkrieg3368 2 роки тому +3

    I just love the engagements with these 'older' jet aircraft. Thanks much! :)

  • @eltigre09
    @eltigre09 2 роки тому +11

    These F5 videos are my favorite. Such a fantastic looking aircraft. On a side note, I feel like you'd enjoy the book "Warriors" by Barrett Tillman. Its a great novel centered around the F-20.

    • @That70sGuitarist
      @That70sGuitarist 2 роки тому +1

      "Warriors" is my favourite air combat novel, but Tillman's other books (The Sixth Battle," and "Dauntless") are also pretty darned good, too. Tillman certainly understands modern air combat, but you'd expect as much from the former managing editor of "Tailhook" magazine.😉
      Rounding out my top three favourites are "In The Company Of Eagles," by Ernest K. Gann, about a feud between a German ace and a French pilot, and "Ace," by Spenser Dunmore, about a high scoring WWII German ace. They're all great reads, very well written, fast paced and exciting.

  • @thefunnyguyfromtheburgerki3334
    @thefunnyguyfromtheburgerki3334 2 роки тому +15

    That first R40 knocked me out of my chair 💀

    • @_HONK
      @_HONK 2 роки тому

      same man! Dcs can be scary as shit

    • @slate4687
      @slate4687 2 роки тому

      R40T would also be interesting altouh they are rear aspect only heatseeking

  • @therocinante3443
    @therocinante3443 2 роки тому +2

    I know the F-5 isn't the most capable fighter around, but god damn is it good looking.

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +1

      It appeals to the same part of the brain that gets excited when you see X-wings in Star Wars.

  • @iLikeBigBlackMen911
    @iLikeBigBlackMen911 2 роки тому +7

    is it only for me which it says “no stream, tap to retry”?

  • @slickninjadude9165
    @slickninjadude9165 2 роки тому +4

    great video demonstrating why pilots are taught to never underestimate their opponents :D But it was also a very entertaining video too. Idk why but I actually jumped a tiny bit when the missiles hit you

  • @mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607
    @mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607 2 роки тому +3

    Nice video, you made me download and start playing DCS a few years ago, thanks for helping me to experience this amazing sim!

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому

      Can you play with just a gamepad or do you need a more serious setup? I can sim race with a pad but I worry flight might be a bit more complicated.

    • @sodkijezu8748
      @sodkijezu8748 2 роки тому +1

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 It might be possible, but difficult and frustrating. Su-25T in DCS is free, so you can download and try it out.

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому

      @@sodkijezu8748
      Awesome, that might be what I try once I lose interest in oval racing.

    • @mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607
      @mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607 2 роки тому

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 You need a joystick to play it. Nothing serious is necessary, just a Logitech 3D extreme pro will work

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому

      @@mcdonnelldouglasf-4ephanto607
      Good to know; I figured that might be the case, even driving is a bit much for a gamepad.

  • @vortx7228
    @vortx7228 2 роки тому +6

    4:50 I was shocked to death

  • @troyl5498
    @troyl5498 2 роки тому

    "See, what had happened was --"
    BOOM!
    Nighty-night.
    Lights out.

  • @captainrogerdodger144
    @captainrogerdodger144 2 роки тому

    4:44 GS: I think it went underneath
    Foxbat: HOLD MY BEER
    I just 💩 my pants LOL

  • @timmy3822
    @timmy3822 2 роки тому

    Lmao I actually jumped when that first missile hit home. Screen just filled with angry soviet machinery followed by loud noises.

  • @SoumalyaBarai
    @SoumalyaBarai 2 роки тому +32

    Okay, i have one question.. foxbats being interceptors, ideally, if you merge, they should maintain their heading and accelerate out, right? It would take some time for an aircraft to turn, and if foxbats do their max speed, i.e. mach 3, they should be able to make some distance in between..
    I understand that with reheat, the foxbats will be prime target for sidewinders, and those missiles do travel a lot faster.. but i was just wondering about the standard procedure.

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  2 роки тому +31

      Ya If I was in a foxbat and I merged with anything I would light the AB and fly straight.

    • @slate4687
      @slate4687 2 роки тому +12

      Actually sidewinders travels around mach 2.5

    • @SoumalyaBarai
      @SoumalyaBarai 2 роки тому +5

      Got it.. so maintaining altitude will help as well? In this video both the foxbats seemed to be down low and in thicker air, which i presume is not that good for an interceptor..?

    • @SoumalyaBarai
      @SoumalyaBarai 2 роки тому +2

      @@slate4687 nice, i did not knew that.. thanks man..
      So those cant touch things like blackbird, foxbats, etc..

    • @peterweller8583
      @peterweller8583 2 роки тому +2

      @@GrowlingSidewinder Even if you could turn inside their circle, you might be able to engage with Fox 1??

  • @Slamboni4k
    @Slamboni4k 2 роки тому +1

    “It went underneath, we’re good…”
    “Ope-“

  • @cengizteouluyurt7053
    @cengizteouluyurt7053 2 роки тому +7

    Love these intercept videos, keep em comin' sidewinder.

  • @YG-zv3me
    @YG-zv3me 2 роки тому +2

    Super clear and easy to understand explanation of these technologies and tactical concepts using the tac view!

  • @dragonbladem6899
    @dragonbladem6899 2 роки тому +37

    I know this would probably be a pain for both pilots, but I’d love to see the MiG-25 go against another plane that can’t dog fight. My first thought is the MiG-21 but I’m sure there are other planes that could fit that bill.

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +17

      MiG 21s are fairly nimble.
      Something like an F-106, F-111 or one of the Sukhoi swing-wings would probably work real well though.

    • @TheGoddamnBacon
      @TheGoddamnBacon 2 роки тому +15

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 i immediately thought of the F-104 myself.

    • @wwclay86
      @wwclay86 2 роки тому +2

      @@skaldlouiscyphre2453 actually the 106 is a decent dogfighter. Try F-104 for an opponent that can't turn

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому +8

      @@wwclay86 The F-104 is a very competent fighter itself:
      "Yeah, just about everybody could out turn a -104 in the usual subsonic dogfight area. But the only birds that gave us a hard time - with the old engine! - were the F-106 and the F-8. The secret was never slowing down and using the vertical to the maximum."
      "The F-100D SuperSabre, F-104C Starfighter, F-105D Thunderchief, and F-4C Phantom II were individually evaluated. All of them had difficulty trying to maneuver with the MiG simulator. The F-104, however, did the best against the highly maneuverable adversary. How did the nearly wingless “missile with a man in it” pull this off? By exploiting the 104’s speed and energy advantage. The F-105 and F-4 could have done much the same, but they were found to have very restricted cockpit visibility, particularly when the F-86 was in a position of advantage."
      The F-106 might be more manoeuvrable but it's got much worse visibility, based on Operation Feather Duster I anticipate the advantage in visibility likely outweighs the advantage in agility.

    • @razvanmazilu6284
      @razvanmazilu6284 2 роки тому +10

      A MiG-21 can dogfight, though not against a modern jet of course. But against aircraft of its era it was capable. Even though it wasn't meant to be a dogfighter, it could hold its own.
      I suspect that, while harder in the MiG-21, the fight would go pretty much the same way as the one involving the F-5. If the MiG-21 can evade the BVR missiles and get to the merge, the MiG-25 is as good as dead.
      All this doesn't mean it wouldn't be fun to watch a 21 v 25 video.

  • @jerryaubert6201
    @jerryaubert6201 2 роки тому

    "I think it went underneath. It went underneath. Doh!!!!"
    Perfect.
    Not throwing shade... just funny as h*ll!!

  • @arctan2010
    @arctan2010 2 роки тому +1

    You sound like Homer Simpson yelling “doh” every time you get a missile up your backside. 🤣

  • @dl6519
    @dl6519 2 роки тому +1

    Good thing you didn't give up your altitude advantage there by aggressively defending that missile... I mean yeah you gave up your aircraft and your life, but dude you STILL had your altitude!!
    (Sorry couldn't resist...SERIOUSLY, I LOVE these unedited videos!!)

  • @meatpopsicle1567
    @meatpopsicle1567 День тому

    Famous last words: "I'm not worried about this."

  • @erikerice9068
    @erikerice9068 2 роки тому

    "We're gonna kill them now." Couldn't have been said with more authority than that moment.

  • @OpinionatedMatt
    @OpinionatedMatt 2 роки тому

    2:08 well if I see an angry Neanderthal in my yard with a club and I just keep sitting in the porch I’m probably gonna get clubbed

  • @StuartKoehl
    @StuartKoehl 2 місяці тому

    If you keep the threat on the 3-9 line in the RWR, you're not flying in a straight line, but in an arc. If you fly a straight line, the bogey is closing with you, creating up-doppler, which can be detected. And, in the RWR, the threat vector would begin moving off the 3-9 line, either into your forward or rear hemisphere. On the other hand, when you hold the threat on the 3-9 line, and it doesn't move, you are flying on a radius with a constant range to the target, though you will be traversing an arc from the bogey's 2-to-10 o'clock (or vice versa).

  • @CharlesHuse
    @CharlesHuse 6 місяців тому

    Admit it....this was actually a 3v2 engagement in the early days of the Clone Wars. GS cloned himself and sent his 2 clone wingmen out ahead to see how they would die so he could formulate a plan on how to not get killed.

  • @fanman71
    @fanman71 2 роки тому

    "The Defense Department regrets to inform you that your son is dead because he was stupid." Haha.

  • @MMuraseofSandvich
    @MMuraseofSandvich 2 роки тому +1

    "Confidence tends to reflect radar, panic tends to have an IR signature."
    -- Someone

  • @__-fm5qv
    @__-fm5qv 2 роки тому +1

    I love the brute-force engineering of the MIG-25. Need to intercept a Blackbird? Have two massive engines and a skin of steel to withstand the temperatures. None of the fancy titanium, just raw power and steel.

  • @disabledcamperhardnocks8068
    @disabledcamperhardnocks8068 2 роки тому +1

    Remember your training padawan. Lol don't underestimate your foe. I enjoyed the lesson.

  • @The_Original_Brad_Miller
    @The_Original_Brad_Miller 2 роки тому

    That first missile was a hell of a jump scare. W00F

  • @firewaterforgeofarizona4304
    @firewaterforgeofarizona4304 2 роки тому +1

    This one was great. After you got killed the second time your voice had an interesting mix of frustration and incredulousness.

  • @kilianp.5692
    @kilianp.5692 2 роки тому

    4:51 absolute heart attack

  • @Reza-bm8cj
    @Reza-bm8cj 2 роки тому +2

    That first explosion gave me a scare jump!😅

    • @preppen78
      @preppen78 2 роки тому

      he gave you a 'Wub-wub!' warning :D

    • @Reza-bm8cj
      @Reza-bm8cj 2 роки тому

      @@preppen78 too late for that:)

  • @WolfHowl71
    @WolfHowl71 2 роки тому

    "They're primitive missiles" he says as he chews on the primitive missile nose cone.

  • @myplane150
    @myplane150 2 роки тому

    "We're good... OH". God damnit! That made me jump!!!😯

  • @pota4144
    @pota4144 2 роки тому

    That second missile got me, I jumped when it hit.

  • @owenmathews8806
    @owenmathews8806 2 роки тому

    I spilt my coffee on the first missile hit! I should know by now when you're over confident:)

  • @rambler8870
    @rambler8870 2 роки тому

    Did anyone else almost 💩 themselves when that first one nailed him? 🤣

  • @sabadab0766
    @sabadab0766 2 роки тому +8

    Please do an Su-27 vs 30, 33 and 35! I love these videos!!!

  • @Vermiliontea
    @Vermiliontea 2 роки тому +2

    Well, a 'Mig 28' should be better than the Mig 25, right? Higher number.

  • @narcissus79
    @narcissus79 2 роки тому

    Foxbat was my favourite growing up - my uncle gave me a model to make when I was a kid

  • @Parabueto
    @Parabueto 2 роки тому +1

    That's really good to see. I've always struggled with MiG 25's on PvE servers. An excellent demonstration of hoow straightforwards they are to notch! But also the beginning was a good heads up that this matchup isn't going to be easy.

  • @Webbamaet
    @Webbamaet 2 роки тому

    First hit made me jump out my skin 🤣🤣 best jump scare I've seen in a game haha

  • @ThunderChunky101
    @ThunderChunky101 2 роки тому

    Never underestimate a 50 year old missile. They built those those things with great skill and alacrity, and they built them to work, and to last.

  • @aliknight2347
    @aliknight2347 2 роки тому

    That first missile hit Scared the shit out of me!🤣

  • @mobosh9454
    @mobosh9454 4 місяці тому

    Iranian real world fighter pilots: Hold my beer 😂😂🔥🔥🔥

  • @ghaley3500
    @ghaley3500 2 роки тому

    LMAO that first missile was a beauty!! Love the vids man, cant stop watching you dudes wreck face in this game.

  • @user-xz9hu4rd2v
    @user-xz9hu4rd2v 2 роки тому

    Oh he throttled back and gave you that turning rejoin at the end.

  • @TheHarrie93
    @TheHarrie93 2 роки тому

    "We should be fine, it went under... BAM" Man those impacts keep jump scaring me.

  • @Kaboomchicken
    @Kaboomchicken 2 роки тому

    We're good
    He said moments before getting viciously Slaughterd.

  • @Rose.Of.Hizaki
    @Rose.Of.Hizaki 2 роки тому

    2:06 - Respect thy authoritor dirty young heathen.

  • @jobu88
    @jobu88 2 роки тому

    Hahahahaaaaa I literally jumped out of my chair when the first missile hit you hahahahahahaaaa

  • @bbqchezit
    @bbqchezit Рік тому

    There's something so menacing about the slower missile, like, you have enough time to register it and be shocked.
    The faster missiles are just a zap from god

  • @andreyjourkovski8348
    @andreyjourkovski8348 2 роки тому

    Ирак с конца 1981 года начал активно применять самолёты МиГ-25 для разведки и бомбардировки целей над Ираном, при этом попытки перехватить такие самолёты оказались крайне сложными для ВВС Ирана. Истребители F-5 и F-4 совершили сотни безуспешных вылетов на перехват МиГ-25, в большинстве случаев у иранских самолётов кончалось горючее ещё до набора требуемой высоты для открытия огня.
    Согласно иранским данным, впервые пилотам F-5 удача сопутствовала 4 июля 1986 года. Тогда МиГ-25 возвращался после боевого вылета и пролетая над Урмией ему на перехват с авиабазы Табриз была поднята пара F-5E (пилоты полковник Нежад и капитан Шабани). Полковник Нежад попытался пустить ракеты AIM-9J, но из за технических проблем не смог, тогда он атаковал цель из пушки и попал в правое крыло. Иракцы подтвердили что «МиГ» получил несколько попаданий 20-мм снарядов, которые причинили ему незначительный ущерб. Иранский историк Бабак Тагваи указывал что последующая судьба этого МиГ-25 была не совсем понятная. Один из пленных иракских лётчиков в 1987 году во время допроса вынужден был сказать что этот повреждённый «МиГ» был списан. При этом в официальном докладе ВВС Ирака в 1992 году о потерях в войне с Ираном безвозвратная потеря этого самолёта не подтверждалась.
    Другие известные воздушные бои между F-5 и МиГ-25:
    24 ноября 1982 года над иранским городом Эйван двухместный F-5F был сбит иракским перехватчиком МиГ-25ПД. Оба лётчика катапультировались[48].
    В декабре 1982 года в районе Багдада F-5E был сбит иракским перехватчиком МиГ-25ПД[63].
    По некоторых источниках заявляется, что в 1983 году иранский F-5E смог сбить иракский МиГ-25ПД[63]. Однако по современным иранским данным, все попытки перехватить МиГ-25 до 1986 года были безуспешными[64]. Российские источники также указывали что потерь от огня противника МиГ-25 в 1983 году не имел[65].
    3 июня 1985 года иранский F-5E вылетел на перехват предполагаемого «безоружного» для воздушных боёв разведчика/бомбардировщика МиГ-25РБ. Однако, иракцы подготовили ловушку для иранского истребителя, отправив под видом модификации РБ перехватчик МиГ-25ПД. В результате боя над иранской авиабазой Тебриз F-5 был сбит, иранский пилот Хассан Задех погиб

  • @maverickmissile801
    @maverickmissile801 2 роки тому +10

    Enjoyed the video as always!
    Here is an odd dogfight I think you should do:
    A dogfight between the A10 and su34. I think I'd be super interesting if it were done

    • @iLikeBigBlackMen911
      @iLikeBigBlackMen911 2 роки тому +4

      i honestly think it would be interesting, since the su-34 is based off of the su-27, i wonder if it could still maneuver like the su-27

    • @maverickmissile801
      @maverickmissile801 2 роки тому +3

      @@iLikeBigBlackMen911 yea that's what I'm thinking, if so, it would be a very good challenge for the A10, if not, it'll be a close one and be super fun to watch.

    • @Audfile
      @Audfile 2 роки тому +4

      It would climb high and fast, then dive down and kill the A10. There would be no gentlemanly merge. Even if they did, Sukhoi would extend away, climb, and take full control.

    • @novahovekh9985
      @novahovekh9985 2 роки тому +5

      I think it better to be su 25 vs a 10 because su 34 is far superior to a10

    • @maverickmissile801
      @maverickmissile801 2 роки тому +2

      @@novahovekh9985 he already did that tho. While I agree it's closer, he already did it. I think it'll be a great challenge using the A10 against the su34

  • @trainer1
    @trainer1 2 роки тому

    I appreciate the history you give about some of the aircraft you fly and fly against in your videos.

  • @secretasianman5215
    @secretasianman5215 2 роки тому

    I get so focused on these videos that every time there is a missile hit on you it scares the hell out of me. lol

  • @radioactive9861
    @radioactive9861 2 роки тому +1

    That second engagement GS, where you 'think you are good' and are going vertical...answers a question I posed to you a couple of weeks ago(and you answered it, thank you, but this demonstrates your answer visually). My question was similar to: Is it ever good to go vertical and use gravity to bleed a missile's energy? And the video just showed you GETTING SMOKED going vertical....well done. Another excellent demonstration of 'what tactics not to use'...

    • @GrowlingSidewinder
      @GrowlingSidewinder  2 роки тому +1

      I remember that question, glad we were able to answer it 😆

  • @obli1680
    @obli1680 2 роки тому

    4:50 that actually made me jump

  • @LennynSquiggy912
    @LennynSquiggy912 Рік тому

    I really enjoyed the tacview explanation at the end.

  • @johngrisham3784
    @johngrisham3784 2 роки тому

    Great breakdown now I can understand what's happening in the battle.

  • @muttbone01
    @muttbone01 11 місяців тому

    Always humble yourself in a fight an assume the other guy is much better. Because somewhere out there, there IS that someone. No-one is greater than death.

  • @Rohanology27
    @Rohanology27 2 роки тому +1

    “They really are primitive missiles”
    _Famous last words…_

  • @bigblue6917
    @bigblue6917 2 роки тому +3

    Back in the 70's the Soviet Russian airforce would fire a heat seeking and a radar guided missile at the same time. They claimed it was because the wanted to make it very difficult for the NATO pilots but I thought it was because they were not sure if their missiles would hit the target. Film footage shown of the two missiles being launched would show the heat seeking missile launched first then the radar guided missile second. The radar guided missile would often lock onto the heat seeking missile and chase it.

    • @spinningsquare1325
      @spinningsquare1325 9 місяців тому

      You got this backwards. Only the heat seeker can lock onto a missile. Since it is fired first this is not going to happen

  • @davidmann1871
    @davidmann1871 2 роки тому

    Great cinematography, and thanks for the Tacview!

  • @dystopianlucidity4448
    @dystopianlucidity4448 2 роки тому

    Dude, how many jump scares can you pack in a video? Dropped my drink on the first one. Spit the drink out on the second. I give up!

  • @CNCTEMATIC
    @CNCTEMATIC 2 роки тому +1

    You know I just watched a video by a very big youtube gamer, who dabbles in DCS, and while generally I love this other guy's gaming videos, it made me realise that the quality of DCS videos on this channel is on another level compared to everyone else.

  • @sbirish25
    @sbirish25 2 роки тому

    Capt Scott Speicher was the F-18 pilot that was shot down in Desert Storm. One of his squadron mates had the Mig 25 locked up prior to him getting shot downloaded, but the awacs didn't provide clear confirmation that the Mig 25 was bandit and not just a bogey.

  • @Strider182
    @Strider182 2 роки тому

    LOL honestly there have been too many times where I'm completely NOT expecting a missile to hit, and then it does and it makes me jump LOL

  • @furn2313
    @furn2313 2 роки тому +1

    Lol the Mig 25 can't even turn to save it's life.... literally

  • @hacxsspyderlounge7801
    @hacxsspyderlounge7801 2 роки тому

    I like it how the Fox Bat(s) just didn't put up after burner.

  • @zzodr
    @zzodr 2 роки тому

    Great video. Used the same tactics to notch SA-10 and SA-12 SAM sites in F19 Stealth Fighter on the C64 (1987). Otherwise you were dead.

  • @ivanstepanovic1327
    @ivanstepanovic1327 2 роки тому +2

    During the Desert Storm, an Iraqi MiG-25 scored a BVR kill against F/A-18... So, don't be so hard on yourself for eating two of those primitive missiles in first two attempts...

    • @skaldlouiscyphre2453
      @skaldlouiscyphre2453 2 роки тому

      That MiG-25 was limited to subsonic speeds due to the mass and drag of the pilot's depleted uranium balls.

  • @daykangemcutting8679
    @daykangemcutting8679 2 роки тому

    there is a good video about guning the mig25 by f5 from iran,the pilot talks about it and how others didnt belive it until iraq and an irqi pilot confirmed it and the f5 gun camera had pictures of it too,its in persian language but he uses aviation language so its understandable for you watch it if u like this stuf,his kill was just like yours lead him in a left hand turn.

  • @skyhorseprice6591
    @skyhorseprice6591 2 роки тому

    I must admit that the double kill on those Foxbats was by-all-the-gods-both-sacred-
    and-profane _satisfying!_

  • @yasinamr5457
    @yasinamr5457 Рік тому

    and also there's a story in late 80s or maybe early 90s of a mig-25 chased an SR-71 over libya .. and even had a lock on it

  • @coachwilson5967
    @coachwilson5967 2 роки тому

    Love the F5 adversary tail marking!!

  • @jaidolenc897
    @jaidolenc897 2 роки тому

    Man the clouds in this video are something else

  • @wilson4328
    @wilson4328 2 роки тому

    The second missile hit on you made me jump out of my skin!

  • @dparrish77
    @dparrish77 2 роки тому

    I've laughed a lot in this video. You talking about "yep, we're good", and then BOOM!! 🤣🤣

  • @glorck7064
    @glorck7064 2 роки тому +1

    YES THANK YOU MORE F5-E I LOVE YOU

  • @SEJay-gj2cv
    @SEJay-gj2cv 2 роки тому

    A US Navy F-5 complete with tailhook? Come on GS you know what to do... Bring her home to mama XD